Solaris 8 to 10 upgrade

I was trying solaris 8 to solaris 10 upgrade (few straight forward upgrades and few live upgrade) on 3 different systems and all three systems are failing to boot with solaris 10 and panicing with the following message after the successful upgrade. Any of you experienced the similar issue ? Any help or pointer would be greatly appreciaed.
{0} ok boot -s
Boot device: /pci@1f,4000/scsi@3/disk@0,0:a File and args: -s
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_118822-25 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2005 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
misc/consconfig:consconfig_get_usb_kb_path() not defined properly
panic[cpu0]/thread=180e000: mod_hold_stub: Couldn't load stub module misc/consconfig
000000000180b890 genunix:mod_hold_stub+1f0 (0, 185e000, 18a7c48, 60000921a50, 18170c0, 0)
%l0-3: 000000007003fc00 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
%l4-7: 0000000000000000 0000000080000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
000000000180b940 unix:stubs_common_code+30 (3a2fed74715, 4dd9e6, 2c7253bc, 0, 16a00, 0)
%l0-3: 000000000180b209 000000000180b2e1 00000000bf000000 0000000000000001
%l4-7: 0000000000000000 00000000018170d0 0000000000000000 00000300003b6028
000000000180ba10 genunix:main+134 (18a8010, 18a4000, 1835c00, 185fc00, 180e000, 1813c00)
%l0-3: 0000000070002000 0000000000000001 000000000180c000 0000000000000002
%l4-7: 00000000018ab100 00000000018ab000 00000000018a8020 00000000018a8000
syncing file systems... done

We got the same error on two V880 production machines going from 8 to 10 and
since we could not afford the downtime to rebuild we had to research the problem
and found the precise opposite of the previous poster.
We had too many packages.
Specifically the Solaris 8 package SUNWcarx was not backed out on the upgrade.
Since there is no SUNWcarx package in Solaris 10 we were left with Solaris 8 drivers
in /platform and /kernel.
The upgrade seemed to have been deficient due to a pkginfo deficiency. For some reason
pkginfo on the Solaris 8 box did not list SUNWcarx , but pkgchk -v SUNWcarx would list
out its files. If upgrade used pkginfo to figure out what packages to back out and failed
to use all available info ( from pkgchk ) then it would leave a package.
So the solution for us was to just delete the files. Here is a script that will flag all the bad files for you. It asumes you have your new Solaris 10 mounted on /tmp/mnt/0 and checks
all the files in the OS directories. You will find that all the bad files are dated between
the year 2000 and 2004, with a few exceptions from January 2005. All the files flagged should be a subset of the files pkgchk -v SUNWcarx generates on Solaris 8.
Some of the files in the SUNWcarx package have been adopted by Solaris 10 so you cannot just delete all the files in the package file list generated under Solaris 8.
Anyway here is the script:
#!/bin/bash
# This script checks every file under /kernel, /platform, /lib, /sbin and /bin.
# A logfile called CHECK_KERNEL_LOG_${NOW} is created
# Any file that does not match its package is listed.
# Conf files tend to have modtime, size and checksum differences because these are use modified.
# The error to look for is "No information associated with pathname",
# this means it does not belong to any package.
# There is a good chance it can be deleted if it is an os directory.
# Script assumes root mounted at /tmp/mnt/0, change MOUNTED_AT variable if different
# Every file checked is listed, only those with error messages are of concern
#set -xv
getword ()
awk '{print $'$1' }'
timestamp ()
date '+%Y_%j__%B_%d__%H:%M:%S'
# pkgchk can only check 1000 files at a shot so........
read_900_and_check(){
LINES_COUNTED=0
CHECK_LIST=/tmp/LIST_OF_FILES_TO_CHECK_${NOW}
ALL_CHECK_LIST=/tmp/ALL_LIST_OF_FILES_TO_CHECK_${NOW}
while read ALINE
do
LINES_COUNTED=`expr $LINES_COUNTED + 1 `
echo $ALINE >> $CHECK_LIST
if [ $LINES_COUNTED -gt 900 ]
then
pkgchk -v -R $MOUNTED_AT -i $CHECK_LIST
LINES_COUNTED=0
cat $CHECK_LIST >> $ALL_CHECK_LIST
rm $CHECK_LIST
fi
done
pkgchk -v -R $MOUNTED_AT -i $CHECK_LIST
cat $CHECK_LIST >> $ALL_CHECK_LIST
# MAIN #
NOW=`timestamp`
MOUNTED_AT=/tmp/mnt/0
exec > CHECK_KERNEL_LOG_${NOW} 2>&1
cd $MOUNTED_AT
( du -a kernel
du -a lib
du -a platform
du -a bin
du -a sbin ) | getword 2 | sed 's/^/\//' | read_900_and_check
# END OF SCRIPT
hopefully I cut and pastes that correctly.....
addtionally here are the deletes we needed to repair the upgrade:
#!/bin/bash
set -xv
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/drv/sparcv9/lebuffer
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/drv/sparcv9/qe
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/drv/sparcv9/qec
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/misc/sparcv9/seg_drv
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/misc/sparcv9/seg_mapdev
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/strmod/sparcv9/authmd5h
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/strmod/sparcv9/authsha1
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/dacf/sparcv9/consconfig_dacf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/drv/sparcv9/ledma
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/kernel/drv/gptwo.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/kernel/drv/sparcv9/bbc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/kernel/drv/sparcv9/gptwo
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/kernel/drv/sgenv.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/kernel/drv/sparcv9/sgenv
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/drv/sparcv9/stc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/misc/sparcv9/pcmcia
rm /tmp/mnt/0/kernel/misc/sparcv9/ufs_log
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T4/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T4/kernel/misc/sparcv9
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Serverblade1/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Serverblade1/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-1500/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/cpu
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R/kernel/drv
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/kernel/misc/sparcv9/sbdp
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V240/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V250/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/kernel/cpu
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-250/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-4/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-5_10/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-80/kernel/misc/sparcv9
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise-10000/kernel/cpu/sparcv9/SUNW,UltraSPARC
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise/kernel
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,UltraAX-i2/kernel/misc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/cpu/sparcv9/SUNW,UltraSPARC
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/dacf/sparcv9
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/drv/sparcv9/pci_pci
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/sun4u/kernel/misc/sparcv9/consconfig
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/drv/lw8.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/drv/sgenv.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/drv/sgfru.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/drv/sparcv9/lw8
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/drv/sparcv9/sgenv
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T12/kernel/drv/sparcv9/sgfru
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Netra-T4/kernel/drv/lombus.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Serverblade1/kernel/drv/bscbus.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Serverblade1/kernel/drv/bscv.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Serverblade1/kernel/drv/options.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Serverblade1/kernel/drv/sparcv9/bscv
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel/drv/grppm.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel/drv/sparcv9/grfans
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/kernel/drv/sparcv9/grppm
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000/kernel/drv/sparcv9/xcalppm
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000/kernel/drv/xcalppm.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/drv/dman.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/drv/schpc.conf
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/drv/sparcv9/axq
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/drv/sparcv9/schpc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000/kernel/misc/sparcv9/mboxsc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R/kernel/drv/sparcv9/pcf8574
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-880/kernel/drv/sparcv9/hpc3130
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/kernel/drv/sparcv9/sgcn
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire/kernel/drv/sparcv9/sghsc
rm /tmp/mnt/0/platform/SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise/kernel/drv/sparcv9/sram
# Hope it helps....

Similar Messages

  • Solaris 9 404 Upgrade to Solaris 10 on Ultra 10

    I tried to do a Solaris 9 404 Upgrade to Solaris 10 on my Ultra 10 with SVM mirrored system drives and it wouldn't get past the Upgrade Profile Initialisation section. It stayed there for a long time, maybe 20 minutes and finally came up with a Failed screen. It compalined about a missing device name, said it couldn't find root or boot and mentioned something about filesystem backups.
    Is an upgrade from tis configuration really supported?
    Ultra 10 440MHZ 768MB RAM. Dual 73GB SCSI mirrored with SVM system drives. One 120GB IDE media drive. There is only a main and a swap partition on the system drive ie everything is in /.
    Am currently backing up the data I want from the system drives prior to attempting an initial install but I'd obviously prefer to upgrade the system and keep the SVM filesystems as they are.
    Nick ([email protected])

    I would break your mirror and do a liveupgrade on the available mirror. Then boot that disk.

  • Solaris 8 - 10 upgrade options

    I want to upgrade a Sol. 8 sytem to Sol. 10 but acomplish 2 objectives in the process:
    1.) Reduce the system disk mounts pts (/var,/opt) to just /
    2.) Attempt to do a UPGRADE install so as to not have to restore all my custom apps.
    I tried a quick UPGRADE install and it failed during the testing upgrade profiile - /usr on Sol. 8 disk is only 2GB big and Sol. 10 needed 4GB.
    I tried a UPGRADE install again but specified a backup media of a spare partition on a spare dirve that is the size of the Sol. 8 system disk but it too failed during install on restoring /usr to 2GB partition.
    I then did the INITIAL install option and could specify my own partition layout and afterwards restore all custom files but it is very time consuming.
    Is there a way to upgrade the Sol. 8 system that would allow me to specify the partion layout - short of the INITIAL install option and have solaris install do the restores for me?
    Thanks in advance,
    Dino

    Answered my Q - I used Live Upgrade!
    With a spare drive >= size of current Sol 8 system disk I was able to copy Sol 8 O/S and perform Sol 10 UPGRADE install via Live Upgrade and have it combine /var and /opt back into root - NEAT-OOOO!!
    Only bug - Live Upgrade set mount permission on /usr to 700 that caused some initial problems until I booted off DVD and chmod-ed /usr to 755. Now everything is OK.
    Dino

  • Solaris 2.6 upgrade to version 8 on SUN ULTRA 10

    Dear Mr. or Mrs:
    I met the same question as uxdms who left the message on Dec 20,2001.
    When I was trying to upgrade from solaris 2.6 to 8 release , there is "failed" warning and the upgrade isn't created.
    There is a detailed info:
    Mechine: SUN ULTRA 10
    Media:
    Solaris 8 installation -- SPARC Platform Edition
    Solaris 8 software 1 of 2 -- SPARC Platform Edition
    Solaris 8 software 2 of 2 -- SPARC Platform Edition
    Installation step:
    Accordidng to the guide of installation, run step by step,
    and there are some special steps below:
    (1) use the /dev/dsk /c0t0d0s4 as disk slice to upgrade.
    (2) selet networked
    (3) don't use DHCP
    (4) disable IPv6
    (5) no NIS+, NIS, DNS ..
    .... displaying the wolcome to solaris dialog box
    (1) Solaris 8 installation SPARC Platform Edition is ejected.
    (2) prompted to insert the Solaris 8 software 1 of 2.
    (3)After selecting serial the dialog box of the upgrade..
    (4)system prompted upgrading...
    initialation is done.
    Checking file system is done.
    (5) There is a installation summary displayed:
    installation summary
    The solaris installation status is shown below
    product status infor.
    Solaris 8 software Failed Detailed(button)
    After click the Detailed button, there is a dialog box
    Failed:
    Log file: /a/var/sadm.system/logs/upgrade_log
    Question is:
    I can't find the file of upgrade_log , and the webstart install stops on it.
    I appreciate for your kind help
    Melanie
    the webstart install stops on initalization -- with 'failed' warning

    Hi,
    If this problem is reproduceable, provide me the exact console error (failed) message to further investigate on this issue.
    Senthilkumar
    Developer Technical Support
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    http://www.sun.com/developers/support

  • Solaris 8 -- 9 upgrade

    We are in the process of upgrading solaris 8 to 9 (Sun Sparc). When installing the patches (patch# 121430), we are getting an error message "patchadd 121430-10
    Checking installed patches...
    One or more patch packages included in
    121430-10 are not installed on this system
    Patchadd is terminating"
    Can somebody help me with this? Its very urgent. I appreciate any help of yours
    Regards,
    Vj

    We are in the process of upgrading solaris 8 to 9
    (Sun Sparc). When installing the patches (patch#What patches? You don't upgrade an OS by applying patches.
    ckages included in
    121430-10 are not installed on this systemRead this message. It's very clear. You are trying to apply a patch to something that is not there. Just ignore this message.

  • Solaris 2.6 upgrade to version 8

    When trying to upgrade an E450 (3 Gb swap) from Solaris 2.6 to 8 release 01/01, the webstart install stops on initialization - with 'failed' warning - and the upgrade-log isn't created.
    Thanks for any help.

    Hi,
    If this problem is reproduceable, provide me the exact console error (failed) message to further investigate on this issue.
    Senthilkumar
    Developer Technical Support
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    http://www.sun.com/developers/support

  • Solaris 10 u3 upgrade to u4 not working

    Trying to update from a patched solaris 10 u3 to solaris 10 u4 and it keeps failing.
    its a mirrored boot with solaris 10 and solaris express installed.
    The error it gives is that either it can't find the OS to upgrade or its un-upgradeable.
    Any ideas why it fails and how i can get this to work?

    You need to delete all local metadevices and metadb before upgrading.
    It seem to be a bug.

  • Solaris 9 live upgrade to solaris 10 segmentation fault

    pre-upgrade work:
    apply patch doc 72099
    upgrade live upgrade to solaris 10.
    lucreate-m /:/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s0:ufs -m /var:/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s1:ufs -m /opt:/dev/dsk/c0t1d0s3:ufs -n sol10
    it works well
    oot Environment Is Active Active Can Copy
    Name Complete Now On Reboot Delete Status
    sol9 yes yes yes no -
    sol10 yes no no yes -
    But luupgrade -u -n sol10 -s /sol11
    Validating the contents of the media </sol11>.
    The media is a standard Solaris media.
    The media contains an operating system upgrade image.
    The media contains <Solaris> version <11>.
    Constructing upgrade profile to use.
    Locating the operating system upgrade program.
    Checking for existence of previously scheduled Live Upgrade requests.
    Creating upgrade profile for BE <sol10>.
    Determining packages to install or upgrade for BE <sol10>.
    Performing the operating system upgrade of the BE <sol10>.
    CAUTION: Interrupting this process may leave the boot environment unstable
    or unbootable.
    /usr/sbin/luupgrade&#91;677&#93;: 6549 Segmentation Fault(coredump)
    ERROR: Installation of the packages from this media of the media failed; pfinstall returned these diagnostics:
    The Solaris upgrade of the boot environment <sol10> failed.

    I would break your mirror and do a liveupgrade on the available mirror. Then boot that disk.

  • Solaris 10 Live Upgrade with Veritas Volume Manager 4.1

    What is the latest version of Live Upgrade?
    I need to upgrade our systems from Solaris 8 to Solaris 10. All our systems have Veritas VxVM 4.1, with the O.S disks encapsulated and mirrored.
    Whats the best way to do the Live Upgrade. Anyone have clean documents for the same ?

    There are more things that you need to do.
    Read veritas install guide -- it has a pretty good section of what needs to be done.
    http://www.sun.com/products-n-solutions/hardware/docs/Software/Storage_Software/VERITAS_Volume_Manager/

  • Solaris 10 live upgrade failed

    I am trying to upgrade Solaris 10 U6 10/08 to U7 05/09 with live upgrade. But it failed with following errors:
    # luupgrade -u -n solaris_u7 -s /mnt/cdrom
    No entry for BE <solaris_u7> in GRUB menu
    Copying failsafe kernel from media.
    Uncompressing miniroot
    Creating miniroot device
    miniroot filesystem is <ufs>
    Mounting miniroot at </mnt/cdrom/Solaris_10/Tools/Boot>
    Validating the contents of the media </mnt/cdrom>.
    The media is a standard Solaris media.
    The media contains an operating system upgrade image.
    The media contains <Solaris> version <10>.
    Constructing upgrade profile to use.
    Locating the operating system upgrade program.
    Checking for existence of previously scheduled Live Upgrade requests.
    Creating upgrade profile for BE <solaris_u7>.
    Checking for GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
    Saving GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
    Checking for x86 boot partition on ABE.
    Determining packages to install or upgrade for BE <solaris_u7>.
    Performing the operating system upgrade of the BE <solaris_u7>.
    CAUTION: Interrupting this process may leave the boot environment unstable
    or unbootable.
    ERROR: Installation of the packages from this media of the media failed; pfinstall returned these diagnostics:
    Processing profile
    Loading local environment and services
    Generating upgrade actions
    WARNING: SUNWwgetu depends on SUNWgcmn, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWi15cs depends on SUNWi15rf, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWi1cs depends on SUNWxwplt, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWbind depends on SUNWbindr, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWale depends on SUNWxwrtl, which is not selected
    WARNING: SUNWale depends on SUNWxwplt, which is not selected
    ERROR: No upgradeable file systems found at specified mount point.
    Restoring GRUB menu on ABE <solaris_u7>.
    ABE boot partition backing deleted.
    PBE GRUB has no capability information.
    PBE GRUB has no versioning information.
    ABE GRUB is newer than PBE GRUB. Updating GRUB.
    GRUB update was successfull.
    Did it really fail due to file dependencies? Will it fix the problem by installing the missing packages on the running BE?

    You need to run this script from the CD or Install server: Solaris_10/Tools/Installers/liveupgrade20 when upgrading to 10 u7. I had run into this. Run the script and choose all the defaults. Liveupgrade will then not give the errors you have seen.
    Linuxbass :-)

  • Solaris administration certfication upgrade

    Hi All,
    Which course will be better to go after Oracle Solaris 10 System Administration Certified Professional. Which one will be better Sun cluster 3.2/ IBM AIX/ HP-UNIX ?
    I need advice since I am going to upgrade my skills.
    Thanks in advance

    user13540780 wrote:
    Hi All,
    Which course will be better to go after Oracle Solaris 10 System Administration Certified Professional. Which one will be better Sun cluster 3.2/ IBM AIX/ HP-UNIX ?
    I need advice since I am going to upgrade my skills.
    Thanks in advanceThe first skill is to think clearly. A 'course' usually means a training course ... yet your questions seems to imply certifications ... especially given you are in a certifcation forum.
    One of the more typically reason to choose one or other of the above direcions may be what is useful to your current work; or what you may feel may be useful in getting you a promotion or work with a different employer. If this is the case you need to research your local market. For example on Inishmurray the demand for HP/UX; AIX and Solaris is about equal.
    My persoanl evaluation is HP-UX is in decline; I'm not sure what the roadmap is. And unfortunately same seems true of openVMS. Feel free to prove me wrong.
    And you haven't mentioned Solaris 11 ....................
    As in all cases certificaitons without the experience to back it may not be particualry useful.
    And perhaps a linux certification should be considered if you must go wider rather than deeper.
    Again AIX is a little difference; but will without the experience would it count for much? It depends on a lot of factors.
    In all events the choice is yours ....... but if you do your own research carefully and honestly you may avoid some poor answers.

  • Error attempting to apply a Solaris 10 release (upgrade)

    I am trying to apply a Solaris 10 upgrade release to my E450 server, but get the following error:
    "Could not reinitialize system state, please exit installer and try again"
    The current release on the server is 10 1/06 and I am trying to move this to 10 6/06.
    Anyone got any idea what it is complaining about, the process worked OK on my V480 servers!.

    For anyone that gets the same issue, I found the problem to be my vfstab file.
    I deleted all filesystems from it apart from the system areas / /usr /var and swap and the install process worked.
    Cannot see anything wrong with the entries that were in the vfstab file, so I guess it is some kind of bug in the upgrade program.

  • Solars 10 Live upgrade

    Hi All
    I am trying to live upgrade Solaris 8 to soalris10. While creating BE is it required that we create /usr file system, because I am giving 10 GB to / and I don�t want to create /usr file system ,but the lu command CLI doesn�t allow me to save without specifying space for /usr. Please help me as I have only 2gb for /usr and it failed due to lack of space/
    Thanks.
    Mohammed Sadiq

    You'll have to tell LU to "roll /usr into / -- the term used is -- merging filesystems".
    In other words, you are relocating the "/usr" filesystem into the "/" filesystem. There's a switch in lucreate that does that:
        Example 10: Merging File Systems
         The command below merges the /usr/opt file system  into  the
         /usr  file system. First, here are the disk slices in the BE
         first_disk, expressed in the format used  for  arguments  to
         the -m option:
         /:/dev/dsk/c0t4d0s0:ufs
         /usr:/dev/dsk/c0t4d0s1:ufs
         /usr/opt:/dev/dsk/c0t4d0s3:ufs
         The following command creates a BE second_disk and  performs
         the merge operation, merging /usr/opt with its parent, /usr.
         # lucreate -m /:/dev/dsk/c0t4d0s0:ufs -m /usr:/dev/dsk/c0t4d0s1:ufs \
         -m /usr/opt:merged:ufs -n second_disk

  • After Solaris 11.1 upgrade "GPU hung" OS starts, but no graphics, GPU hung

    I have an Intel DH77EB motherboard. Solaris 11 installed fine (after disabling Intel VT-d). Upgrade to 11.1 processes went fine. OS boots up. Not services in maintenance mode. But, I can't access the console because the GPU has hung. Get the following in /var/adm/messages:
    Nov 8 15:18:51 media genunix: [ID 851289 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_do_wait_request:1479] wait_for: i915_do_wait_request taking EBUSY
    Nov 8 15:18:51 media genunix: [ID 552796 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_do_wait_request:1490] i915_do_wait_request returns -16 (awaiting 1292 at 1291, next 1293)
    Nov 8 15:18:54 media genunix: [ID 851289 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_do_wait_request:1479] wait_for: i915_do_wait_request taking EBUSY
    Nov 8 15:18:54 media genunix: [ID 552796 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_do_wait_request:1490] i915_do_wait_request returns -16 (awaiting 1292 at 1291, next 1293)
    Nov 8 15:18:57 media genunix: [ID 851289 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_do_wait_request:1479] wait_for: i915_do_wait_request taking EBUSY
    Nov 8 15:18:57 media genunix: [ID 552796 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_do_wait_request:1490] i915_do_wait_request returns -16 (awaiting 1292 at 1291, next 1293)
    Nov 8 15:19:03 media genunix: [ID 409100 kern.warning] WARNING: [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed:1447] Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
    scanpci output:
    pci bus 0x0000 cardnum 0x02 function 0x00: vendor 0x8086 device 0x0152
    Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
    In the HCL, it appears that the graphics device is supported.
    HCL webpage snippet:
    8086,162
    i915
    Information
    Video
    Intel Corporation
    Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
    8086,152
    i915
    Information
    Video
    Intel Corporation
    Xeon E3-1200 v2/3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller
    end snippet

    I had trouble with Gnome desktop after upgrading from 11.0 to 11.1
    Solution was to remove pkg SUNWvboxguest.
    After suggessful remove I could re-run pkg upgrade.
    Check/paste /var/log/Xorg.0.log that might give some hints...
    I got eg. this error; but NOW its working...:)
    Nov 15 20:18:59 dagobert11 gdm-binary[1109]: [ID 702911 daemon.warning] WARNING: GdmDisplay: Display /org/gnome/DisplayManager/Display1 failed 5 times in 18.000000 seconds, no longer managing display

  • Vlan stopped working after Solaris 11.1 upgrade

    Sorry for the long post.
    I upgraded a test server to Solaris 11.1 from 11/11 a few days ago. After I did the upgrade my one VLAN-based network connection stopped working. I've been messing with it for days and am a bit baffled.
    Note that everything was up and working just before the upgrade. This is not a switch configuration problem or a cables issue.
    All of the other networking survived the upgrade just fine...
    The link that stopped working is a VLAN running on top of a two-link LAG. The untagged link running over the same LAG works just fine.
    So here's the strange part. As I was trying to get underneath it all today I fired up wireshark to see if I could figure it out. As soon as I put wireshark up on the interface (in its default promiscuous mode) the link started working. All the packets in the trace looked normal. All was good. As soon as I stopped the trace the link was dead again. Start a trace - link in promiscuous mode - and all is good again. Stop and it stops...
    If I bring bring up wireshark on the link without promiscuous mode the link does NOT start working. If I initiate a ping that should go out on the broken VLAN I see a series of ARP requests but no answers (running wireshark on the machine being ping'd I see all of the ARP request come in and the answers go out, but the Solaris machine never sees the answers).
    So - did Oracle manage to break VLANs in 11.1? Any ideas how to get it working again?
    A few bits on info from the machine. The only thing that looks odd/wrong I've highlighted below.
    Phil@TEST:~$ dladm show-link
    LINK CLASS MTU STATE OVER
    e1000g1 phys 1500 up --
    e1000g0 phys 1500 up --
    ixgbe0 phys 9000 up --
    ixgbe1 phys 9000 up --
    aggr2 aggr 9000 up ixgbe0 ixgbe1
    aggr2vlan5 vlan 9000 up aggr2
    Phil@TEST:~$ dladm show-vlan
    LINK VID OVER FLAGS
    aggr2vlan5 5 aggr2 -----
    Phil@SE11_SAN:~$ ipadm show-addr aggr2vlan5
    ADDROBJ TYPE STATE ADDR
    aggr2vlan5/v4 dhcp ok 192.168.5.101/24
    Phil@TEST:~$ dladm show-linkprop aggr2vlan5
    LINK PROPERTY PERM VALUE DEFAULT POSSIBLE
    aggr2vlan5 autopush rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 zone rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 state r- unknown up up,down
    aggr2vlan5 mtu rw 9000 1500 1500-9000
    aggr2vlan5 maxbw rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 cpus rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 cpus-effective r- 0-7 -- --
    aggr2vlan5 rxfanout rw -- 8 --
    aggr2vlan5 rxfanout-effective r- 16 -- --
    aggr2vlan5 pool rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 pool-effective r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 priority rw high high low,medium,high
    aggr2vlan5 forward rw 1 1 1,0
    aggr2vlan5 protection rw -- -- mac-nospoof,
    restricted,
    ip-nospoof,
    dhcp-nospoof
    aggr2vlan5 mac-address r- 0:1b:21:6b:23:98 0:1b:21:6b:23:98 --
    aggr2vlan5 allowed-ips rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 allowed-dhcp-cids rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 rxrings r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 rxrings-effective r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 txrings r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 txrings-effective r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 txrings-available r- 0 -- --
    aggr2vlan5 rxrings-available r- 0 -- --
    aggr2vlan5 rxhwclnt-available r- 0 -- --
    aggr2vlan5 txhwclnt-available r- 0 -- --
    aggr2vlan5 vsi-mgrid rw -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 etsbw-lcl rw -- 0 --
    aggr2vlan5 etsbw-lcl-effective r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 etsbw-rmt-effective r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 etsbw-lcl-advice r- -- -- --
    aggr2vlan5 cos rw -- 0 --
    Edit/Delete Message

    Fixed. Don't know exactly how/why, but fixed.
    When I came home this afternoon I deleted the all of the IPs associated with the VLAN and the LAG. I deleted the VLAN itself and deleted the LAG. Basically tore down all of the datalink and IP layers leaving only the raw interface cards. Rebuilt the LAG, rebuilt the VLAN and reinstalled the IPs. And like magic, the whole thing is happy.
    Something in the configs of the LAG or the VLAN must have been corrupted during the upgrade. But now its all fat, dumb and happy again.
    Very odd.

  • Solaris 7 system upgrade from Sun 60?

    We need to replace a Sun 60 on a large system and want to upgrade to a faster machine but we MUST stay with Solaris 7. We started looking at the 1000, 1500 and 2500 but they seem not to support Solaris 7. Can anyone tell me the fastest workstation that supports Solaris 7.
    Edited by: shadow83 on Oct 21, 2008 7:49 AM

    You will likely be limited to the Ultra-80 / E420R / Netra 1405 series of systems.
    They all use the same systemboard and can have as many as four 450MHz US-II processors.
    You can install as much as 4GB of RAM to them as well.
    The U80/E420R/N1405 systems were all discontinued in 2002.
    They will therefore be rather inexpensive to buy as used machines from web sites such as Ebay.
    All newer models will need a newer version of Solaris.
    Solaris 7 just wouldn't know how to make the newer hardware function.
    It was disontinued in 2003.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Availability Check for Material..

    Hi Experts, I got one critical issues in availabilty Check while creating the Sales Order. System is not checking availabilty of particular material in a plant, but for all others material it is checking. I have check the Material master of that mate

  • Itunes is crashing on step 3 of match....ridiculous solution...

    I contacted apple about this problem and they told me that they don't know what the problem is and that they haven't been dealing with the problem enough.  However, their solution is that I create a new user and then migrate everything over to the ne

  • Mail doesn't send emails

    I have two accounts. Mail suddenly stops sending emails though i can receive emails from that account. I checked the email server and it is absolutely working fine. It throws an error and asks me for my password again and again. Whats weird is that t

  • Re: Using JOptionPane for Input and Output

    You're going to get in big trouble with things like this: "if (memtype = P)" Remember that '=' is for assignment, '==' is for comparison. Furthermore, you shouldn't use '==' for comparing Strings; you should use the String's equals() method instead.

  • Rename home folder

    Hi, I have set up my new Mac and stupidly when I set it up I spelt my name in lower case, so now in finder (places) my directory is in lower case, see: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3191/3025439421e2468333c5o.png If I do this in Terminal: *sudo mv g