[solved] MP3 library management question, need advice

Let me preface this, I LOVE amarok 1.4. Not as a player, hundreds of apps can play MP3's, but its ability to organize/tag. I have a new dir of MP3s, I can open them into the playlist, tag/retag/run musicbrainz, then import them into the master directory that is organized alphabetically, by artist, then by album, with the ability to throw a cover image in the directory. I have yet to find any "music" app that has been able to anything near that.
I feel its time to move on, get the kde3.5 libs off my machine, and find a new player knowing that eventually amarok 1.4 will die. And afaik, the last time i checked none of its clones like clemetine or exaile has those features. I'm wondering if there is a standalone app that has those media management features. I'm ok with the media management being seperate from the player, since i dont need it as frequently as the player itself, but I'm not ok with 3 different apps replicating amaroks features, i.e a tagger/musicbrainz interface, a db app, a cover importer all seperate.
So is there anything out there that does that? I'm looking through AUR but i'm not really sure what to look for.
EDIT: Found this perfect solution - beets - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39577
Last edited by zippy (2010-10-10 15:07:27)

Try GCstar (http://www.gcstar.org/index.en.php). However, you can find other collection organizers, but have a look at gcstar.

Similar Messages

Simple Question, need advice. BOBJ vs. BI

I didn't know where to post this, but I need advice.
I have been working as a SAP BI Developer for past 2 years. I have an opportunity to transition into BOBJ (means I will not be in BI team).
Wanted to know if this is a good career move, but have few questions.
1) Which is easier BOBJ or BI?
2) Which is more in demand and will be for next 10 years?
3) I've heard that there's a very high chance to work from home as a BOBJ Developer compared to BI Developer? True/False?
4) Is pay for either the same?
Thanks in advance.

"Having extra cores will be a distinct advantage..." ?
Better optimized to take advantage or to handle the scheduling of threads?
Right now, it is a mixed bag and give applications a year to be recompiled and optimized - or longer. The transition to Leopard also has taken more than a year to get where it is.
I would not discount last year's 2.8GHz 8-core as a better buy and value.
http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/specialdeals/mac/mac_pro
Why 10.5.7 now runs better
http://www.hardmac.com/news/2009/05/15/did-mac-os-x-10-5-7-modify-management-of- multithreaded-tasks

IPhoto Library Manager question!

Hi,
My iPhoto recently stopped working (it opens fine but immediately stops responding and I always have to force quit). After reading advice online I downloaded iPhoto Library Manager so that I would at least have access to my photos. I'd really like to return to using iPhoto and assume that to do so I should remove the application, re-download it and then transfer the photos back over from iLM. Firstly, is this the right thing to do (if not, what is)? And secondly, will iLM save my photos even if I delete iPhoto?
Thanks a lot for your help!
H

Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting.

IPhoto library management question...again

First of all, I am new to the forums and new to Macs in general, hence some of my concerns/questions are probably a result of my exclusive use of Windows.
I have a relatively large number of photos (15,000) and have spent a lot of time over the years organizing them in a logical structure (Photos->Year->Month->Date->JPG files...) I have been reading a lot about iPhoto and I do understand the file structure within iPhoto, and I would be happy to begin adapting with my new photos. However, I am looking for an efficient way to transfer over all my hundreds of folders to the iPhoto library. I know it's been asked before, but thought maybe I am missing something. If I am way off then blame it on the extensive use of Windows over the last 15 years...I am mainly concerned with preserving the file structure/hierarchy. Do I need to just throw it from my OCD mind and just let iPhoto deal with it, while I practice with the export function?!?
Thanks for any input you can provide.

Each folder imported into iPhoto ends up as a single event. However, they will not be nested. You can go thru and add the year, month and date to the folder titles be for importing and you'll get an Event name that will be more indicative of the contents. I use "MM/DD/YY-Brief description".
Then, as Larry suggested you can duplicate your folder hierarchy in iPhoto by creating a virtual folder to match the container folders (those that contain other folders but no photos) and drag those Events into it to create albums for those events.
Click to view full size
OT

ITunes Library management questions

My name is Lucas osmond i am having difficulty trying to figure out how to do something to iTunes. Here is some background I have been a radio disc jockey for 20+ years. I have a very large library of music 40,000+ albums. A lot of my albums information is not in the iTunes database, I have taged 18,000+ albums. I have created a playlist with all of these albums I would like to remove everything in my library except for this playlist. The playlist is the question is 129.7 GB. My first attempt was to back up the entire playlist to a 160 GB iPod. I did this and and Then I enabled disk mode of the iPod and copied the folder called music to my desktop. The hard drive on my mac is 500 GB which means once I copied it to the desktop I did not have enough room of the computer to import the tracks into a fresh iTunes library. Is there an easier way to do this process? I realize i have a special case and what I am trying to do is not normal. If nobody comes up with any ideas is there anyway for a customer to talk to a Apple developer or iTunes engineer?

You need to ask Apple to reset your security questions; ways of contacting them include phoning AppleCare and asking for the Account Security team, clicking here and picking a method for your country, and filling out and submitting this form.
They wouldn't be security questions if they could be bypassed without Apple verifying your identity.
(104567)

Question - Need Advice Regarding Second Hard Drive On HP Pavilion dv7t-4100 Notebook PC

Hi,
I currently have a HP Pavilion dv7t-4100 Notebook PC, and my hard drive failed (luckily while still under warranty!). So I contacted HP support and they are in the process of sending me a replacement hard drive, so that I may install it. When I opened the back of the notebook, I realized that a second hard drive could be installed, if desired. I would be interested in doing this! My current primary drive was (and will be again) a Toshiba 1 TB Internal hard drive Serial ATA-300 2.5" 5400 rpm, model MK1059GSM. I understand (from reading a previous post) that for the second hard drive, I will need to purchase a "2nd HDD Caddy & Cable for HP dv7-4000, dv7-5000, dv7t SE" (the purchase link the tech in the other post referred to was http://www.newmodeus.com/shop/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=345); and now I need to decide on the size (and other stats) of the hard drive that I will buy to install and used as the secondary drive. The HP customer service rep I spoke with on the phone about my primary drive replacement said that it is usually recommended to not go any higher (in capacity) than the primary drive, for the second drive, to ensure a more "stable" system (but I am not sure about the level of"technical" knowledge he has about the inner workings of the notebooks). However, from my upgrading experiences with desktop PCs, I was usually able to go as high in capacity as I could/desired; as long as the physical size of the drive was the same, and it was compatible with my system. And I usually did choose to go with a larger capacity second drive, as this was where most of my data and media files were stored (with the primary being used for mostly operating system and system files). This is my first time "upgrading" a Notebook, so I wanted to check with the techs here on the board- would it be a problem for me to go with a secondary drive larger than my primary drive's 1TB capacity? Also, are there any other factors to consider and keep in mind when selecting a second hard drive? Any advice and replies will be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much for your help with this! -Brian

You should be able to go as high as 2TB.
I also own a,(Older), DV7 notebook which has dual drive capability.
I bought my caddy from the place recommended and got everything needed including screws !
I matched the capacity in mine with an exact same hard drive and have never had a problem.
Minor battery life noticable but that was it.
Your system BIOS is what will hold you back from say a 3TB drive.
You can go to HP site and check the specs on your model and find out for 100 % sure.
HP Support & Drivers | United States
I would recommend doing what I did and match the drive exactly.
Good day !

Library Management question

Hi, is there a way of ordering the library view by albums which are collapseable, so that I don't have to scroll down endless tracks? Ideally I'd just like to see a nice unclutterd list of my albums by title, which I could then expand individually to see the track names. I don't want to setup playlists for all my albums, and mostly use the library view. Hope this isn't too obvious. thanks

Thanks for the replies, but I'm really not sure that you understand my question. I know you can display and order by song, album, track. What I want is each album displayed as a single one line title, without all its tracks displayed, making a short neat list of albums. I would then, for example, be able to click a collapse/expand triangle, or on the album name, to see all the tracks on each individual album. I find the default setting where you see all the tracks cluttered and exhausting to scroll down. thanks

Song Library Management Question

I have a music library several times larger than my 32gb ipod. My computer recently had a hard drive failure. I reinstalled itunes with everything else. My ipod of course still works. I have about 2750 songs on it. The problem is everything in my library is now checked.
I would like to take my ipod library list and check only those songs on my itunes library and have my ratings and play count overwrite what is in my library. If I sync will it assume my library is the master list and try to stick everything on my ipod overwriting my ratings and play count? It's bad enough I lost my library rankings in the reinstall, but I would hate now to lose the 3-5 star ratings on the several hundreds songs I have marked that I like that are on my ipod.
How do I handle this in itunes?

I'm not sure I have enough information to answer this. You mentioned all of your songs being checked, and it doesn't sound like you actually lost any music. If all of your music was stored on the drive that crashed, and you have simply restored it from data cds for example, then there is nothing left of your original library and you have no choice but to rebuild. This happened to me in 2006, and it's very frustrating, but as a previous poster mentioned, it actually can be fun. once you get past the initial shock of losing everything, You just have to adapt the idea of a fresh clean start and "this one will be better than the last anyway."
On the other hand if your computer has two hard drives, or if you kept your music folder on an external hard drive, other than the drive that crashed. You may have your previous library still available and not even know it. For example, your C Drive crashes, you restore evrything, then you open a music folder on an external hard drive and drag your music back into your new library. You have all of your music, but it's a mess, all of your ratings and playcounts are gone, and yes everything is checked.
If that's the situation, you can fix it in about 30 seconds.
Here's the problem. I have windows XP, I know nothing about Vista and I can't really give you step by step instructions. The instructions I'm giving you are for XP and it may or may not work the same on vista. You can try it, and if it doesn't work, open iTunes. Click help. Look for answers on the subject "creating more than one library", "using multiple iTunes Libraries" or something to that effect. They should be able to give you the answer for vista. I went to my help to see if I could find it for you, they only give me one answer and make no mention of other computers. I suspect each computer has help for that compueter.
Anyway, here's the XP solution.
Hold the shift key down, and open iTunes. Do not let up on the shift key until you get a window that asks you to choose a library, or create a new library. If iTunes opens without giving you that choice, just close it and re-open it with the shift key down. Nine times out of Ten it works on the first try. Click "choose a library". You will get another window that allows you to navigate to your hard drive and show iTunes where your music is stored. In a folder called iTunes or iTunes Music, choose "iTunes Library.itl" This should bring back your entire library exactly the way it was when you last used it.
I think I remember raeding somewhere that Vista stores the library in a different place, I don't remember where, I had no reason to pay attention at the time. But hopefully you know where it is. Hope this helps a little

Photos for Mac - Important Library Management Question

Hello,
I wanted to make sure that Master files are not imported into the Library database file, as they are already organized in folder on my drive.
So I unchecked "Copy items to the Photo Library".
Now I did a test by importing 66 MB worth of 30 photos to a brand new Photo Library with the above option unchecked. The Photo Library database in the Finder still turned out to be 44 MB!
After opening the folder contents in the Finder I realized that the reason is because it saves the thumbnail version of the files I imported. Even though they are obviously smaller versions of the Master File, and the Master Files are not imported. It's still 2/3 the size of the original files!
So my total photo database is around 100 GB, if I import it all into my photo library and even if it's half the size, that's an extra 50 GB on my hard drive for thumbnails, that's just crazy.
Is there a way to disable thumbnails from being generated at all when using Photos for Mac, or is it inevitable that even with "Copy items to the Photo Library" stays unchecked that the Photos database file is going to have a big file size because of thumbnails?
Thanks,
Nick

Alley_Cat wrote:
This might be an instance for feedback in relation to 'preview' image sizes - if there were some control over size/quality the overhead could be reduced.
Sure, but while that would reduce the storage overhead, it would increase the CPU (& probably memory, both real & virtual) overhead substantially, as well as making the app sluggish when displaying lots of images at once or scrolling through the views.
So I think that once users tried it, they would quickly decide the tradeoffs were not worth it ... & many would complain that Apple should have done something magical to eliminate the drawbacks if that option was to be added to the app.

Purchasing question - need advice!

Hi all! I'm new to this discussion board but not to Macs. I'm a graphic and web designer that just struck out on his own and I need a Mac b/c my PC isn't going to cut it. I would like to get a new Mac Pro but I have CS 2 Premium and the MX 2004 web suite or whatever it's called. I know people are having problems with the latest OS and older versions of the creative suite... not sure about MX 2004. I just wanted to know if I should just go ahead and get a new Mac and hope for the best or if it would be better to find a pre-owned Mac somewhere on the web that's older of course? Also, if pre-owned is the way to go any recommendations on where to get it would be nice. Thanks!

If it was me, (and I'm well aware that it isn't), I would get the Mac new and the software from eBay if I was lucky enough to find an unregistered copy or something that is close enough but good enough.
Try to get the best you can afford. It avoids you having to upgrade and lose money again later. I used to have a G5 1.8DP and while it was very very good, once I upgraded the graphics card it became noisy. I used to love the way it looked with the side cover off though, (plastic shield still in place). Even the new MacPros can't run like that safely for too long. The move to the Pro though saw a significant increase in speed.
The name 'Mac Pro' sounds really cheesy though. I think G6 is where they should have moved toward.

Help/advice using iPhoto library manager

I got the pay version of iPhoto library manager, and it seems to work well. But I'm looking for some advice on how to best organize my photos between the two libraries. I'm using the following basic system:
I have my entire photo library containing all my photos on my external drive, and I named this library Lacie.
Then I have a subset of my photos, basically my favorites and recent photos, on my laptop. This library is called Macbook. I am running low on space on my laptop (and soon will be running out on my external too and will need to get another one, but I can probably put that off for a bit).
When I import photos, I usually import them onto my macbook, play around with the events, delete fuzzy photos, etc. Then periodically I move the new events over to my Lacie drive so that everything is on Lacie. I then delete photos that I don't like that much to make space on my Macbook.
Now here's the problem. I went on a trip to France and I put all my photos on my Macbook, and I moved the events over to Lacie. Then at one point I organized all the france photos on my Macbook into albums. Now I'm trying to move that organization to Lacie, so I tried to drag those albums over to Lacie using Library Manager. However, it asks if I want to import duplicate photos and I don't, so nothing ends up happening except that empty albums are created. Is there a way to do this, or do I need to do all of my organization directly on my Lacie? Any advice about better ways to organize this? I'm new to this multiple libraries thing so maybe other people have worked out better systems.
Thanks!

Ok, so, say I import a bunch of photos from a trip. I have these photos in events by day, say 7 days worth of events. Now I want to put some of them in albums: photos to send to mom, photos to post to flickr, etc. I don't necessarily want all of them to go into albums, but I don't want to lose the ones that don't go into a particular album. What's the best way to copy those over to the Lacie once I'm done? Is it better to make one folder with all the photos from that week and then have albums within it containing the subcategories, so that I can just copy all the albums? If I copy the albums and then also copy the events, will that work?
I guess mainly what's bugging me is that in iPhoto, photos exist in events and then are also organized into albums, like the library and playlists in iTunes. Having to think about them as separate things to copy over is confusing and I'm not sure how best to do it. I want to keep the organization in events AND albums without having duplicate photos taking up space.

Workflow help needed, transitioning from iPhoto/iPhoto Library Manager

HI all, I am using latest Aperture, iPhoto, and 10.6.3 on lan connected macs and need some help setting up a workflow/libraries that represent some sanity amid the tens of thousands of photos that I have. Before getting Aperture3, i was using iPhoto and iPhoto Library Manager to work between an imac and an mbp; i would create a temp library to travel with on the mbp and then when I returned to the office I would merge the updated temp lib with the master lib housed on a huge external drive hanging off the imac. Using iPhoto Library Manager this is a lot of work and very slow indeed.
So with my new install of Aperture3, I am sure there is a better way, I just have not found a coherent tut that explains what I should be doing under these circumstances. I see that I can import iPhoto libraries, and that I can also use referenced files to get things into Aperture no matter where they are, or I can ??? Really confused on all the options.
Ideally, I think what we all want is a cloud like repository for all photos where users could check in and check out photos and have all the metadata preserved, but I guess they also want ice water down under, and haven't gotten that yet either.
Short of the above fairytale, what can I do? I do expect to have another mbp in the field soon, so that will be two machines/users that will need to pull things out of a master repository and check back in updated files as well as add new files to the collective.
Thoughts? Thx.
coocoo
Message was edited by: coocooforcocoapuffs

1) Import my one massive iPhoto Library into Aperture 3 - but do I use referenced or embedded options? Is there any advantage to leaving everything in iPhoto and just referencing from Aperture? Or do I get everything into Aperture and then just blow away iPhoto?
I see no reason to leave the files in iPhoto. If you agree you can do one of two things: either move them elsewhere and reference them or manage them in Aperture. Many folks recommend referencing them, but it's a choice only you can make.
I see no reason to continue with iPhoto.
2) In Aperture, I can export a set of projects from the main repository into a "traveling library", say when I take the MBP out on assignment,
Correct: File -> Export Project as New Library
and then when I return, I just import that library back and the updates I made on the road will get integrated with the whole again? If so, that's worth the price of admission!
Correct.
Regards
TD

I need good gui in swings for a library management system

i need good gui in swing. i need to develope a small application of library management system where a librarian and manager access the database. librarian take care of add,del,modify the records of customer and books. with good login screens. and the manager is to generate reports

Yup, create one. Good exercise.
Doing it myself right now, am loosing track of my own collection ;)
Don't have the multi-user part in place yet, it's no priority for me (I'll be creating a readonly web interface as an alternative to the read/write Swing interface for remote access).

Need iPhoto library management help

I've been trying to organize and archive my photos and videos for the past few weeks. I have well over 250GB, spread over several iPhoto libraries on an external drive. Many of those libraries contain duplicate images, and are taking up way too much space. I am looking for an app that will scan multiple iPhoto libraries stored on an external drive for duplicates, so I can remove them and consolidate all of my libraries in the smallest amount of space possible.
I haven't had luck with: Dupe guru, Duplicate cleaner for iPhoto, Photos Duplicate Cleaner or iPhoto library manager. I know that I had found one before that scanned the libraries and showed me which duplicate images were on which library and gave me the option to delete them. That was a while ago, and at that point, I hadn't organized things to the point that I was ready to start deleting. It may be one of the apps listed above that I'm just not using correctly. If so, and if someone can walk me through getting started doing it the right way, it would be much appreciated. If not, and there is a different app available, please let me know which one it is & I'll try it.
Not sure if this matters, but I'm using OS X 10.7.5, iPhoto '09, version 8.1.2 (424)
Thanks in advance.

Duplicate Finder apps for iPhoto all search the contents of one library for duplicates. There is none that compare across Libraries.
If you are seeking to consolidate your Libraries, then using Library Manager to merge them can be done while also eliminating duplicates.

I'm desperately needing advice to a common question. I use Quicken and love it. But the Mac version is not as great as the PC.   Has anyone installed it by segmenting their Mac with Parallels or Fusion or Boot camp. If so, which one do you recommend.

I'm desperately needing advice. New Mac.   Used Quicken on my PC. Researched all software for Financial programs and Quicken is still the most recommended.   I want to use Quicken on my Mac. The Mac version is not highly rated so I would need to partition my Mac.   Has anyone done this for their quicken program and if so, which partitioning program did you use - Parallels, Fusion ware or Boot camp?
Thx

Lisa Ellies-Laye wrote:
Thanks. Hadn't heard of it. ? Is there any concern installing this free program on my Mac.    Have you used it? Apart from being free is there any other advantage of Parallels and VMfusion. ?
Virtual Box is safe and well developed, it offers similar or identical features to the paid competition, it may be a little less polished but that's all.
Download and try it out, nothing to lose (except time).

[solved] MP3 library management question, need advice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for