Some open item queries

hi,
i read about open item management and now have few queries.
1) account meant for open item manged only for clearing account?
2) i read this 'when you activate open item field in the Gl it means those accounts need to be cleared at the month end'.
my question is for clearing account then i quite agree but what about customer and vendor account in point 3? how to clear at month end?
3) i read the follows. what does it mean 'automatically set for customer and vendor account?
You can only clear open items that are posted to accounts that
are managed on an open item basis. Open item management is
automatically set for customer and vendor accounts. For G/l
accounts, however, you have to set the open item management
option in their master record yourself. Open item management
would usually be set for the following G/l accou
thanks

> 1) account meant for open item manged only for clearing account?
<b>Not necessarily, Any account, where you expect the balance to be zero at some point of time or those accounts, where you expect contra entries. i.e for every debit entry, if you expect a credit entry with equal amount, this account can qualify for open item managed.  The open item management, is meant for better managing of accounts. GR/IR account is a classic example. First when goods arrive, the GR is credited, later when invoice come for the same goods receipt, this account gets debit.</b>
> 2) i read this 'when you activate open item field in the GL it means those accounts need to be cleared at the month end'.
<b>Not mandatory, Nevertheless, it can be a good practise.</b>
> my question is for clearing account then i quite  agree but what about customer and vendor account in point 3? how to clear at month end?
Vendor and customer account usually gets cleared automatically when payment is recieved or paid. If not done at the time of receipt, this may be done at period end. For vendors and customer who has not been paid or received, you cannot clear those account. The open items will remain and should be so.
> 3) i read the follows. what does it mean 'automatically set for customer and vendor account?
>
> You can only clear open items that are posted to accounts that are managed on an open item basis. Open item management is  automatically set for customer and vendor accounts.
<b>Vendor and customer accounts are sub-ledgers, They are not main GL. An account opened in these sub ledgers, automatically come with the feature or open item managed. Because, it is always expected the their accounts will be brought to zero, as soon a particular transaction is completed.</b>
> For G/l  accounts, however, you have to set the open item management  option in their master record yourself. Open item management  would usually be set for the following G/l account.
<b>See comments for the first item</b>

Similar Messages

  • Restriction on amount on Open items query (FI-CA)

    Hello,
    we are trying to implement the queries 0FC_C07_Q0001 and 0FC_C07_Q0002 for reporting on open and cleared items from FI-CA to BW.
    From the open items report on FI-CA (transaction FPO4) it is possible to select based on the amount, and also to relate this balance at BP, CA... level.
    From BW team they say it is not possible to do the same with the open items queries in BW. They say the amount is not even available as a parameter. Is it like this? Can't we select only the open items for CA with more than a specific amount?
    Many thanks in advance,
    Montserrat

    Hi,
    It is possible if you are using conditions, like if the reqt is to show amounts greater than X (entered by user), then a Condition can be created on the amount key figure and use the condition type Greater Than and supply a variable which will be used by the user during run time. See here for full details:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/73/702e39074dc93de10000000a114084/content.htm
    Hope this helps...

  • Interest Calculation on Cleared Open Items

    Hi,
    I have the following scenario:
    We have a receivable to a customer. Posting date of the transaction is June 01, baseline date is also June 01 and due date is on July 15.
    Entry is (Exhibit a)
    A/R-Customer 1
       A/R-CEWT
    At the same time, we have also CM to the customer with July 01 as posting date and July 01 as baseline date.
    Entry is (Exhibit 2)
    A/R-CEWT
        A/R-Customer 1
    In order for the customer not to pay anymore the A/R-, we did automatic clearing for the AR and CM with July 1 as posting date of the clearing.
    Entry is
       A/R-Customer 1 (Exhibit 2)
         A/R-Customer 1 (Exhibit 1)
    But why is that when i run the interest on July 25, interest was still computed for the AR (Exhibit 1) when there should be none because it was already cleared on July 1, 14 days before it become overdue.
    Is it because clearing is also customer?
    Thank you

    Hi,
    We can calculate interest on items cleared with in the calculation period.
    When you are calculating interest on open items, system will check open items as on the Calculation Date.
    But if you want to calculate Interest on items cleared with in the calculation period., you have to check Calculate Interest on Cleared Items also.
    For Instance: If you are calculating Interest on 31st July for the period of 01.07.2009 to 31.07.2009, in this case
    some open items are already cleared with in this calculation period, even though you have to calcuate interest for those cleared items for that many days. System will calculate interest for that many days.
    Try with this option, still if you need any help please let me know.
    Thanks
    Chandra

  • Turning Open items which are partially payed into Close items.. How?

    Hello,
    In our company we use partial payment to Vendors using transaction F-59 and also automatic paymant of full amounts. Everything is working correctly but since we use very offen partial way of paymant, on transaction FBL1N I have a lot of open items and most of the time I don't know exactly how much do I own to vendor(s).
    To explain it easier I will show one simple example:
    1. I own to one of my vendors amount Eur 10.000
    2. Using transaction F-59 (partial payment) I pay him Eur 3.000
    3. When I open transaction FBL1N for that vendor and if I choose to show only Open items
    total amount shows me that I own him Eur 10.000 instead of due amount 7.000
    I understand that total amount of Eur 10.000 instead of Eur 7.000 is shown because we use partial instead of residual way of paymant but I would like to know is there any way I could manually turn these Eur 3.000 into close item because they are already payed?
    Searching through Internet I found that transaction F-44 could be used for similar but I am not sure it can do exactly what I need: to turn all partial payed open items to close items so for each vendor then I could see exact amount I own them.
    I hope someone can help me with this because I must solve it ASAP and it's slowing me down at my workplace and it would be great if I could manually close some open items, because they are already payed.
    Greetings,
    Adi
    Moderator: Please, try searching before posting a new thread. Clearing issues are well described on these forums
    Edited by: samnovice on Jul 30, 2011 3:50 PM

    Hi:
         Knocking off invoices against partial payments in F-44 is a standard procedure that is used to clear open item outstanding in Vendor ledger FBL1N. You should ideally clear partial payment in Residual Tab of F-44 and for remaining amount e.g 7 in your case you should double click in residual item column next to amount. By doing so system will also copy the original invoice reference to the partial document AB (with 7 amount) as per setting defined in OBA0 for residual item clearing.
    Line item 10 and its payment line item 3 are standing open in ledger because you did not apply them in F-44. You could have also directly apply them in F-59 of F-53. Partial document will be generated with document type as per setting you have defined in OBXH. Hope this will clear your understanding.
    Regards

  • Open Items not considered for Payment Lot

    Hello Experts.
    I have created some open items using FPE1. They are displayed as due in FPL9. But the same open items are not selected in FP06 for clearing. They are also not considered for clearing in a payment lot (FP05).
    Can some one tell me what could be the reason for this
    Best Regards
    Venkat

    If you have a clearing restriction, to be able to remove it when you change the document in FPE2 for example you need to activate that clearing restriction in:
    Financial Accounting > Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable > Basic Functions > Open Item Management > Define Modifiable Clearing Restrictions
    If you don't do that you cannot manually change it.
    Adriano.
    PS: Again are people in these forums that put answers to be in the statistics... GOD..

  • Open item management in GL master data

    Hi
    We created GL master data in 2000 and that time "open item management" was not selected.
    Later in 2004 we needed "open item management" so we canged settings.
    now the problem is we are not able to see cleared items for that GL A/C.
    even if we clear also it is still showing open item only.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    prasad

    Hello
    If you have created a GL account without selecting open item managment check box and lateron you found that it should have been maintained on Open item basis,the system will not alow you to mark the checkbox as open item mangt if some open items still exist.
    First make the account balance to zero by clearing the account.Even if the system issue a error msg try these:
    Block the relevant account for posting in the company code
    Run program ZFSEPA03
    Unblock the account
    In earlier versions there was a program which when run allows you to maintain OI for future transactions, but I am not sure about this now
    reg

  • Reserve Invoices - Cancelling open items

    Hi,
    We are having problems with reserve invoices. Our situation is:
    1. We create a reserve invoice.
    2. We create an incoming payment against the reserve invoice.
    3. We create delivery notes against the line items.
    Sometimes however:
    1. an item will never go out as discontinued for example so we need to cancel some open items. This doesn't seem possible without delivering the goods? Although we can't deliver the goods as inventory would go negative as of course we can't get the item.
    2. The whole order is cancelled.
    Either way, it represents the same problem, how do we close of line items which are not delivered?

    Hi,
    For the discontinued items, will you delivery any substitute? You may need to cancel everything to recreate the right document if that is true.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Few queries about foreign revaluation for vendor/customer open items

    I am trying the transaction F.05 for the first time for vendor & customer open items in foreign currency. I have a few queries:-
    1. The ouput contains 2 exchange rates. One is picked from the transaction header. My query is from where is the other rate being picked up. In my current system, I could make out that exch rate in transaction header is being picked automatically from table OB08....however I am unable to deduce the source of the 2nd exch rate.
    2. What is the significance of "balance sheet preparation valuation". Earlier in test runs, only "new difference" was getting populated. However the user wanted to see "old diff" also. So while doing some trial run in test client, I checked the "bal sheet prep valu" and posted.....after this run, I am getting values in "old diffe" and "new diff" also. And the posted amount is the difference of the two. What is the significance and ideal way?
    3. Should the entry be reversed if I am revaluating at year end? Why I am asking is because in some threads I read that revaluation at year is not to be reversed....
    Thanks,
    SM

    1. To find out difference latest date(Key Date for OI Overview) will be taken by comparing with document posted dated. Based on that system shows diffrences
    2.   The items are valued using the exchange rate valid at the key date. The
          difference determined in local currency is output and posted. The
          valuation can also be done for parallel local currencies and according to
          different valuation approaches (HGB, GAAP).
          The result of the valuation is required for the creation of the financial
          statements. You should therefore carry out the valuation before the
          grouping of receivables and payables with program SAPF101. The valuation
          difference is then noted in the document. Use the valuation areas to
          calculate a different valuation method, or to save the result for further
          processing activities.
    3.   we need to reverse entries .

  • Comparing fbl1n open items  my program some vendors total amont is not tali

    Hi
    this is vendor aging report.  i have used BSEG, FAGLFLEXA, LFA1, BKPF.
    problem is  Comparing fbl1n open items  my program some vendors total amont is not tali.
    sapose : 1033  fbl1n date is : 30.01.2009.
               my report used same date .
    here proble is : fbl1n show clear item also  in  partuculr date range but
                             my report show only open items ony not peaking  close item's in ie date range.
    SELECT BUKRS BELNR BUZEI GJAHR LIFNR KTOSL XAUTO REBZG UMSKS KOART AUGBL BSCHL UMSKZ SHKZG WRBTR ZFBDT DMBTR ZBD1T ZBD2T
    FROM BSEG INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_BSEG WHERE BUKRS EQ P_BUKRS AND
    LIFNR IN S_LIFNR AND
    AUGDT GE P_BUDAT and AUGBL = SPACE
       AND KOART = 'K'
    AND ( BSCHL = '21' OR BSCHL = '22' OR BSCHL = '23' OR BSCHL = '24' OR BSCHL = '25' OR BSCHL = '26' OR BSCHL = '27' OR
    BSCHL = '28' OR BSCHL = '29' OR BSCHL = '30' OR BSCHL = '31' OR BSCHL = '32' OR BSCHL = '33' OR BSCHL = '34' OR
    BSCHL = '35' OR BSCHL = '36' OR BSCHL = '37' OR BSCHL = '38' OR BSCHL = '39' OR BSCHL = '50' ).
    please give me solustion.

    hi,
    See perhaps this pable
    VBSEGA                         Document Segment for Document Parking - As
    VBSEGD                         Document Segment for Customer Document Par
    VBSEGK                         Document Segment for Vendor Document Parki
    VBSEGS                         Document Segment for Document Parking - G/
    Rgds

  • Ignore some specific Open item in AR during credit check

    Hi,
    User had a customer whose AR open items are subjected to "settlement issues" and are still opened after 90 days.
    The customer had been assigned a risk category that will blocked the sales order when open item is more than 90 days.
    How can I configured such that the credit check will bypass the selective open item (AR) document line items for a certain customer without changing the same checking for other customer within the same credit control area.
    Currently, whenever a sales order is raised, it would be blocked by the above and the documentation to releasing it can takes over a few days. Not only that, a hugh paperwork are required as stipulated by audit requirement.
    Any options to bypass selectively?
    Thanks

    If Im reading this right you want the open AR item that is in dispute excluded from credit check thus not placing new orders on hold due to the oldest item check
    Create a special G/L indicator that is excluded from credit check. During the AR process this indicator can be applied to either the total invoice or the remaining amount. The system will then exclude the disputed item from credit checks allowing all other sales to proceed as normal without affecting the way the credit check works for all customers. Once the dispute is resolved and if the amount becomes an actual outstanding recievable the indicator can be removed and will once again be included in the scope of credit check for the specific customer.

  • BEX Issue:Intgration of master data and Open Items cube data

    Hello Gurus,
    I need some help in BEX queries.
    I have master data Contract Objects which has master information like Max Number of payment and monthly installments.
    In the open items cube I had open items balance for multiple line items. So I need a report which show Portfolio under which we can have multiple contract object.  So Portfolio P1 ->  contract objects C1, C2, C3 The report is as follows
    Portfolios  Total Amount               Open Items
    P1           Sum of total                Sum of open
                 amount each                 items in cube
                 contract object
                 under P1 C1 + C2 + C3
    1) Total Amount = Max Number of payment * Monthly installmens(Sum for each contract object in Portfolio)
    2) Open Items = Sum of all balances under open items cube.
    Now problem is if I join the two using multiprovide the Total amount gets SUMMED multiple times for each line items in open item for contract. I just wanted it summed for once for each contract object .
    How do I ensure that TOTAL AMOUNT IS calculated just once for each contract object ? Is there means to solve the problem.
    Regards,
    Check.

    Hi Ryan,
    Please go through this post to see the consequences of transaction load before master data load:
    Master data not yet transferred to BW but transaction data has
    Hope this helps...

  • Unable to Clear Vendor open items in F.13

    Hi All,
    We have few vendor codes, where all are having some normal open items as well as Spl GL open items and net balance is 0.
    When we do clearing with F-44, No issues at all
    But when we try to clear them through F.13, system is grouping normal open items and Spl GL transactions separately.
    If i choose  Shortlist (Statistics) in selection screen, then only atleast i will be able to see normal line items in one group and spl gl items in another group.
    If i choose, Detailed List with Error Log, i am not able to see anything related to any kind of line items.
    So then, i red the documentation of the program SAPF124, in that it says Down payments can only be cleared if down payment clearing for the same amount has been posted.
    As we all know that, each spl GL transaction can be cleared against one normal transaction in F-54. But in our case, we never do that practice, and always want to clear spl GL transactions along with normal transactions.
    My question is that, Is it mandatory to clear them in F-54 before doing F.13?
    As i know, there is an check box option for selecting spl GL transactions in F.13....in this case why should i clear prior to F.13?
    Please advise...
    Regards,
    Srinu

    Hi Gaurav,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    I agree with you, but my intention is to know, whether any possibility (change of internal selection criterion for recon account)
    to clear them automatically in F.13 without doing F-54 only.
    Anyhow i have found two other alternative solutions for the same.
    1) Batch input recording for F-44 in LSMW.
    2) Using worklist instead of vendor code in F-44 to clear all items at one go.
    As our business won't follow clearing with F-54, so this requirement may come often. 
    But only my concern is, they need to identify these cases separately and spend more time to add each vendor code to that worklist, since they are not able to add a range of vendor codes directly. As it allows only single values.
    So, is there any other way, which we can suggest them to add 10000+ vendor codes to the same worklist, since we can add 12 codes at one go and repeating the same will take time
    Regards,
    Srinu

  • Possible to clear vendor open item against already posted payment document?

    Hi
    Can you advise if it is possible to clear an open item against already posted payment/clearing doc? Here is the background to the scenario:
    An invoice was posted with transaction FB60. This was subsequently picked up in the payment run F110 and cleared by payment document number 200005678. The item went to the bank on the paymnet file and was paid out to the vendor. The transaction reference, which appeared on the incoming bank statemnet was the payment document number 200005678.
    Subsequently it was discovered that the original invoice should have been posted with reference to a PO using MIRO. The requirement now is to reverse the paymnet documnet 200005678 in SAP, then reverse the document that was posted using FB60. After this the invoice will be posted using MIRO. This will create an open item on the vendor account.
    This item will not be piad out again. Therefore the requirement is to try clear that open item against the previously posted payment document 200005678.
    Is there any way to clear this vendor open item against the originally posted payment document 200005678?? Or any other advice on how this scenario can be handled in SAP?
    Thank for your help.
    Mike

    Hi,
    I tried that option in our test system. I ran FBRA and entered Paymnet Documnet Number (+Clearing Doc Number), Company Code, Fiscal Year.
    Then chose menu option Clearing -> Reset Cleared Items.
    The system pops up a window asking for a reversal reason and reversal date.  I use 01 and posting date of today.
    The system now posts another cleared document. That document places the invoice as an open item on the vendor account. It does not place the Payment Document as an open item on the account.
    When I go to F-44 only the open vendor invoice is showing there. There is no open paymnet document.
    Is there perhaps some configuration setting that stops the placement of the paymnet document as an open item when reset?
    Thanks for your help again.

  • URGENT---Automatic payment run-Vendor open item clearing

    When I run the payment program, it ran without any error, however, the vendor account was not cleared. The balance in GL and Vendor account remains the original amounts. And the Vendor line items which were supposed to be cleared thru F110, are now showing as Open items.
    please give me the TCODES to look in.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance
    Sharath

    Dear Sharath,
    To check whether your payment run has actually generated any payment document or not, please follow the following steps:-
    (1) Go to transaction SE16/ SE16N and table REGUH, give the "payment run ID", "run date" and "Proposal Indicator as blank".
         It should show the payment document.
    (2) If (1) above show payment document, then go to table REGUP and check the invoices paid.
       If invoices are there in REGUP, then there might be some issue in the payment document updation in the system which you can check via transaction SM12. (For this just check in table REGUV, whether payment documents created and posted are equal or not for the payment run.)
    (3) if (1) do not show any payment document, that means payment run has not made any payment.
        In this case, you create a new payment run and in the parameters select the error logs display also and in free selection give the document number you are expecting to be paid off by the payment run. This might help you to know the reason of non payment by cheking the proposal log/ payment run log.
    I hope that this should assist you
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Vendor Open items Authorisation

    Hi Peers!
    Is there any report were i can authorise the payments to which vendor and which invoice i can pay today like that.
    Ex: Say my higher authority wants to select the open items vendor wise to pay the due. so that i will check that invoices and pay through outgoing payment.
    Pls reply soon, Its urgent
    Thanks
    Murali

    Hi
    There are so many age wise analysis reports are there for analysing the customers or vendors open items. out of those, F.41 for vendor open items there you can find all the relevant data including business area level also satisfied because in some cases higher management wants the particular business area wise required for analysis. similarly f.21 for customers.
    I hope it will be suffice your requirement.
    Regads
    madhav

Maybe you are looking for

  • Images not Drawn Properly

    I am simply trying to draw an image over a JPanel and it will not appear until the JFrame has been minimised or hidden behind something. Ive tried all kinds of repainting. Ive seen this topic before, but none seems to have a clear answer. HEPL! pleas

  • ICloud Keychain verification

    Hi all, wondering if anyone can shed a little light on this. I received 3 sms to my land line today from 51472 saying "your iCloud Keychain verification code is" each message had a different code and all the messages occurred in about 15 mins. I am v

  • How to enable create folder Icon

    Hi, When I am using the setSaveDialog() method of JFileChooser to select the location, the default directory which appears if no argument is passed is "My Documents". In Windows XP professional edition the create folder icon in this dialog gets disab

  • Badi's & Tables in ESS

    Hi I am working on ESS in ERP 04. I need to do changes in ESS UI. Can anyone advice on Where and How we can use Badi's and tables to bring changes in UI. Thanks Rakesh

  • How to add other variableIterator in PageDef.xml

    firstly I added the second variableIterator into PageDef.xml file, then i made use of DCIteratorBinding iter = panelBinding.findIteratorBinding("secondVariableIter"); to get it,but iter is null thanks