Special request with backend PO

Hi Gurus,
We are on SRM 5.0 using classic scenario. The system works fine according to the customizing in
SRM the source determination logic in MM. In the case of external procurement, the system is to always create a purchase requisition or, if the data is complete, a purchase order
In the classic scenario the purchase order is created on R/3 side.When we create a Backend purchase order or purchase requisition the system runs the price transfer from the contract/info record.
As for Special Request during shopping cart creation, sourcing is performed internally which a standard behaviour of the program when all needed information is available i.e., Material number, Vendor number in the shopping cart . It searches sequentially for possible source of supply and will apply that valid source in creating purchasing document when it is able to find in any of these -
>Quota arrangement --->, Sourcelist --->, Contract, ---> Inforecord. At that time, the only valid source available was the inforecord that is why the program was able to create the purchasing document in the backend using the inforecord as its reference. The PO was created in the backend since our present configuration via the customizing, for non-stock materials, it will trigger to create PO if item data is complete (able to find a source of supply) otherwise it with create a PR."
Can we prevent the use of the 'Info Record' when there is no valid contract/ source list? Our business requirement is for that a PO, with the exception of PO type ACMI, must be generated subject to a valid contract.
Thanks.
Jho

Hi Jho
Shows vendor using Purchasing info record in Source of supply tab
eventhouh the sos is selected by the user with inforecord ,please validate the sos vendor if it is a puchase inforecord by BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI throw error message like please select a contract as Source of supply not inforecord".
regards
Muthu

Similar Messages

Creating a debit memo request with reference to an invoice

Hi,
An invoice shows wrong MWST value because of incorrect customer tax classification as Tax exempt. I corrected the cust tax classification to "Liable for Tax". Then I tried to create a debit memo request with reference to the incorrect invoice. Thats a requirement by the customer. Invoices with incorrect VAT are not to be cancelled. A specially created VAT only sales order (Debit memo request) is used to create a sales order with 0 net value and correct MWST . But while trying to create the debit memo request, the system picks up the same old condition record for the MWST. How to overcome this situation ?
The copy control for the item category from billing doc to debit memo request is set to "B" that is new pricing. I even tried to update pricing. But it does not work. Changing the Service rendered date or the pricing date to current date also does not help.
Please help.
Regards.

This is working fine. What I did was
1: create a new pricing procedure
2: made the PR00 condition statistical
3: using a routine calculate the MWST based on the PR00. But PR00 itself does not contribute to the net value. This part is working fine. I could create debit memos successfully.
The problem is if we change either the customer or the material tax classification after creating the invoice, and then create a debit request with reference to the incorrect invoice, the system still considers the old tax classfication and therefore the old MWST rate. If I create a debit request without reference, the new rate is applicable.
I hope I have made clear.
Regards.

Problem in SRM (with backend PO)

Hi,
I have a problem in creating a PO with backend product category in backend. The error message is some backend documents could not be determined.
But I could able to create a PR Reservation and Direct PO for the same Product Category. (in the backend and in SRM too).
Org Structure:
I have maintained the transaction type in attribute tab. (backend/EC).
I have maintained the Product Responsibilties and Org Responsibilities for the Respective Pgrp. (Product Cateogeries)
I also have maintained the Product Categories in Extended attributes.
In SRM I havent maintained the transaction type for the EC but I have maintained the follow on document number range. (shopping cart)
The Transaction Type is maintained in the backend and the number range as external.
I have also maintained the Product categories in Technical Basic settings and defined the backend system with respect Product categories in Cross application basic settings.
Please let me know if you need any more information...
Thanks
Jagan

Hi Jagan,
If your SC is considered as complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
- prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
- custom checks in user exits in R/3
- error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
Kind regards,
Yann

You cannot cancel a change request with status New.

We're just starting to dive into SCSM. We created a test Change Request and now want to delete / cancel it. When we try, we get a message
"You cannot cancel a change request with status New."
Is there an easy way to remove this?
Orange County District Attorney

Hi, a Little late but..
This is a problema from your 3 scsm services, maybe in your principal or secundary server. You must to restart services in an special order and delete application cache.
Please review
http://www.systemcentercentral.com/scsm-2012-tip-all-workflows-stuck-in-new-status-and-never-completing-issue-and-workaround/
it Works!
If you have principal and secondary do it in both servers.
I think this problem is for bad performance in databases and application, so review your hardware design, and logical, so review workflow performance too.
For items when state new, you must change it to inprogress with smlets

Add Supplier Part Number Special Request in SC

Hi Experts,
My req is that need to add Supllier part number (PARTNER_PROD) in SC for Special Request (Describe Requirement.)
This field is there when you select the Material from Catalog but If you go to special request (Describe Req) will not be there. This is not Custom field . The Partner number field is there in the I_ITEM structure-BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL.
Just I want add this field in special req and store into I_ITEM strucutre.
Can you anybody help me out this.....
Regards,
Kumar S

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
<u>We have handled these type of requirements in our earlier SRM implementations.
As Ramki told, OSS note 672960 and 485891 are for adding custom fields on the shopping cart item level.
Since this field is not visible in Describe requirement section of the shopping cart, you need to add a custom field as this will not involve any HTML templates modification.
Incase you don't want to add a custom field then you need to make modification to HTML templates and it might become quite complex to handle this in future.
Therefore, it's recommended that you should go with adding a custom field and map the data coming from catalog values to this custom field inside the BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI to suit your requirements.
Incase you need any help, in order to suit your requirements, do let me know.</u>
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

Match downpayment request with payments through F-53

Hello,
Our client makes downpayment request in F-47 and then makes payment (invoice-based) through F-53 or F110.
How can we match the downpayment request with the payment made if it is not through F-48?
Thanks in advance....

Hi,
Request is as good as maintaining our communication to the vendor.
Its only when the actual payment is done, that a down payment is posted.
Only then it would affect the accounts. Hence until its posted thru F-48, its not affected.
You can post F-47 and do a F110 run which would do a posting in F-48.
Later a payment run can be done again thru F110.
Caio
Raghu

Guide ep7.0 with backend R/3 4.7?

Hi, gurus:
where can i find ess configuration on ep7.0 with backend R/3 4.7?
in nw04 and nw04s, ep use JCo connects backend.
what connection type is used by r/34.7?
Thanks
Br,
Chrina

Hi Chrina,
If you look at the link below it states what SAP recomends your release should be for each business package:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/contentportfolio
ESS 50.4 -> EP 5/6, R3 4.6C/4.7
ESS 60.2 -> EP 7, ERP 2004
ESS 1.0 -> EP 7, ERP 2005
I have implemented ESS 50.4 with EP7 and both R3 4.7 and ERP 2005. It can be done, but when I spoke to a contact from SAP they stated the landscape I was using was not recommend and there was no documentation availbale for the specific landscape. You have to use bits of documents from various guides.
Thanks,
Nick.

Message V1478 - Credit memo request with reference to an invoice

Dear all,
Creating a credit memo request with reference to an invoice, I get the following message "Material in item 000060 does not exist in plant/storage location".
Of course, this material exists in the plant and the storage location, as we could create the invoice without any problem.
Any idea?
Best regards,
Iné

Hello
Generally, these errors may appear due to:
- The plant is marked for deletion.
- The plant should be copied from the referenced item.
So, I would suggest you to
- Check copying control for Invoice to Credit memo request, particularly, item.
- Try and create Credit Memo Request with reference to sales order.
- Or if you want rectify a invoice, then use invoice coreection request.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries

Hi All,
I have a doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries.
Suppose I have a customizing request with respect to a table that contains say 10 entries in the development system.
Now I am transporting this request to the quality system in which the same table contains 20 entries.
When I am transporting this table from the development system to the quality system, will my 10 entries in the development system get added to the 20 entries in the quality system or will my table get overwritten in the quality system.
What difference will this be if it is a workbench request ? .
Regards,
Sushanth H.S.

Hello,
So if we are transporting contents of a table from one system to another, it should always be a customizing request and not a workbench request right.
If the "Delivery Class" of the table is 'C'(Customizing table, maintenance only by cust., not SAP import) it will ask for a customizing request.
If it is 'A'(Application table (master and transaction data)), it will ask for Workbench.
To add to your previous qn, when you transport the entries to subsequent system it will always check the KEY FIELDS and then update. If you see a transport, then the table entries are represented by their key fields.
If you create new entries in your table and transport, it will add the records. Else it will modify them
Hope i am clear.
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Jan 23, 2009 11:51 AM

Error when creating a travel request with Advance amount

Hi Gurus,
When I create a travel request with an Advance amount and try to save the same, the system throws up an error msg : "Trip country does not exist in the system (T005).
However, it allows me to create the travel request without this error if i dont enter any advance amount in the travel request.
I checked the tables V_T706L and V_T706O and found my trip county to be existing.
Regards
Prakash

Hello Prakash,
The following are the prerequisites for transferring trip costs to accounting. In other words when you try to create and save a travel request with advance you are involving accounting entries and therefore the following needed to be checked:
1.Travel Management and Accounting are both at Release 4.5A. If at least one of the systems
has a release level lower than 4.5A, follow the instructions in Customizing for ALE.
2. For payment to be effected, vendor accounts must exist in Accounting for the respective
personnel numbers.
3. The following Accounting tables must be replicated in the Travel Management System using
Customizing transports:
Company Codes (T001)
Countries (T005)
Input Tax Codes (T007A, T007S)
Document Types (T003)
4. The transfer of settlement results
More relevant in your case would be the point 3. Countries(T005) not defined in TM.
Hope the above provided you more information.
Rgds
CONMJI

Creating Travel request with TRIP Getting Error 'Infotype P0017 could not be read'

Getting this error while creating travel request with TRIP transaction code. Please help for an alternate way to create Travel request or help to resolve this issue.
If this error is due to 0017 maintenance, please help me to maintain infotype 0017.

Hi
This is done by functional Guy
As work around
Go to transaction PA30 to open master record of employee for whose trip need to be created type 17 at infotype -> enter F5 and Save.
With regards,
Gopala Krishna

After Mavericks OS upgrade, can no longer make any HTTP requests with the OPTIONS verb

My machine can no longer make any HTTP requests with the OPTIONS verb. This happens whether I try it curl, postman, or ajax.
curl -i -X OPTIONS http://www.google.com returns curl: (52) Empty reply from server
It should return a long string containing a 405 error code.
I suspect that this is related to the Mavericks upgrade I did earlier this week. I only have one mac (my dev machine) with Mavericks. Other macs are Mountain Lion and they don't have this problem.
Can anyone else with Mavericks confirm whether or not they have this problem too?
If this is Mavericks related, anyone know of a fix or workaround?

Turns out that it wasn't Mavericks related at all. Cisco AnyConnect has a security module running behind the scenes even when you're not VPNed into anything. It was blocking my OPTIONS verb requests. I was able to make these calls after uninstalling.
Re-installing with Web Security turned off should prevent it from happening. While I was uninstalling I did notice that there was a web security uninstall script in /opt/cisco/vpn/bin but I already committed to taking the whole app off my machine. Simply running that script could have done it too.
I must give credit to Ben Nadel. It was his blog post that helped me fix this issue.
http://www.bennadel.com/blog/2559-Cisco-AnyConnect-VPN-Client-May-Block-CORS-AJA X-OPTIONS-Requests.htm?&_=0.10495476494543254#comments_44093

Credit Memo request with reference to Billing Document number via IDoc

Hi,
I want to create credit memo request with reference to billing document number via IDocs.
I have tried through ORDERS05, but when I process I saw that it is only processing with reference to contract number or quotation.
So is any other way of creating credit memo request creation with reference to Billing document number via IDocs?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Santhi

Please Help... it is Urgent... Thank you

Credit memo request with zero net value

Hello all,
when we create a credit memo request (VA01, doc type CR) and put a material quantity into the credit memo request that falls below the scale in VK13, the net value for the material will be zero.
We do not want to allow to save the credit memo request with a zero net value, but SAP will just allow us do that.
I was wondering if there is a way to pop up a warning or even an error message that avoids saving the document in case of a zero net value?
Thanks
Anne

Hi,
You can make the condition type (for which $0.00 is not allowed) as mandatory condition type in the pricing procedure. By this way the system will give error and wont allow to proceed any further unless the data is complete. (make sure this is not affecting your regular sales order cycle).
Or if you just want to give a pop-up message then you can use user exit USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE in include MV45AFZZ
Regards,

Creation of Change request with reference to existing change request

Hi
I want to do Creation of Change request with reference to existing change request for MDG-F and MDG c/MDG S Is it possible? If yes, How?

Hi Sanjay,
No , its not out of box functionality in MDG. Reason being, MDG framework provided some standard API's with the help of which we can do our development with ease.
Like Governance API                            : IF_USMD_GOV_API
       Convenience Governance API         :IF_USMD_CONV_SOM_GOV_API
       Change Request API Interface:       IF_USMD_CREQUEST_API
With the help of which you can play around with your data in MDG with the pre-defined methods of it.
Best Regards,
Kaustubh

Special request with backend PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for