Split valuation in MRP

Hi,
I am having a material as A ( FERT ) with child components as B & C ( HALB ).
The Component B is split valuated material as ( Dom and EXP ) valuation types.
If the demand for the material A is domestic then material B with dom valuation type will be used. or else material B with exp valaution type will be used.
Now while running MRP for material A, Proposals are getting generated without any valuation types.Even under the BOM maintenace of Material A there is no specific field to define the valuation type.
How to proceed with this, whether split valuated valution types will be considered during MRP run or does it needs to be changed after proposal generation.
Please suggest.
Regards,
RitiG

Hi,
Firstly check in the config of the valuation type and you will see a "default" setting for internal and external procurement.
By setting the default for external procurement on the most common valuation type at least you should get part of what you want, at least there should be a valuation type instead of it being blank.
I am not sure how you can set the system to use the correct valuation type other than this, but I will keep digging.
Steve B

Similar Messages

  • Split valuation in PR after MRP

    Hi Guru´s!
    We run the MRP for any materials whit split valuations. After run MRP, the PR has been created, but without valuation type, this is a problem because don´t take release strategy.
    I need to know if is possible to created PR whit MRP whit the valuation type as default.
    I see in OMWC but it´s not working.
    Thanks
    Regards

    Hello Jürgen,
    My problem it´s not resolved.
    The issue is:
    We run the MRP for any materials whit split valuations. After run MRP, the PR has been created, but without valuation type, this is a problem because don´t take release strategy.
    I need to know if is possible to created PR whit MRP whit the valuation type as default?????????
    I see in OMWC but it´s not working. In Table T149B I see :
    Valuation Area          Valuation Cat              Valuation Type
    1000                          V                                 1010
    1000                          V                                 1011
    1011                           V                                1010
    1011                           V                                1011
    When I think this is wrong. I need stay this table like:
    Valuation Area          Valuation Cat              Valuation Type
    1000                          V                                 1010
    1011                           V                                1011
    One for one.
    Can you help me step by step to work whit OMWC
    Thanks
    Regards

  • Split valuation type pick up in MRP run according to BOM

    Dear experts,
    We are starting to use split valuation scenario. Initially we have customize split valuation as standard  i.e.
    1) Creation of valuation type
    2) Creation of valuation category
    3) Assignment of cat. and type.
    4) Local definition.
    5) Assignment of valuation category in material.
    6) Extend material with valuation type.
    What i have customized and tested is working fine. Recently our user have a requirement that, valuation type field should be available in BOM for their clear understanding. Accordingly we have enhance the BOM screen and added valuation type to be choose by user during BOM creation. exit used PCSD0002.
    Now here is issue.-
    I have parent X and its child Y with valuation type SKF, BOSCH and NRB. I have fixed/specify valuation type BOSCH in BOM. If we run MRP for the parent, system should have to create purchase requisition for child with only specified valuation type in BOM i.e. with BOSCH in this case.
    Note - We cant use default proc. valuation type in customization as customer requirement is frequently changes also user specified that, system must have to select valuation type specified in BOM and create proposals accordingly both for PIR and dependent requirement.
    Please suggest.
    With best regards,
    Manish K. Bachate

    Hi
    You would be very much able to valuate both the stocks separately with what I have recommended
    But, with what you are doing, you wont be able to... Reason being, once you release std cost for the externally procured item, say, 5 USD... It will keep on valuating the item at 5 USD only.. Any price other than 5 invoiced by the vendor would hit the Price diff account OR you will have to revise your std cost every time the vendor changes his price
    Ideal way would be to keep price control V in the valuation type "External Proc"... With this, you dont need to release std cost for it and also it would valuate the stock at whatever price supplied by the vendor.. Whether 5 or 6 USD
    > To summarize, what I am recommending is this
    > 1. Your material in this case will have 3 accounting view... [One parent view and One view for IN HOUSE and one for "External Proc"
    > 2. Parent view will have Price control V, IN HOUSE will have S and External Proc has V
    > 3. In IMG settings for split valuation, earmark IN HOUSE for internal proc and External Proc for purchase
    With this
    1. Your IN HOUSE stock will be valuated at std cost released by CK24
    2. Your External Proc stock will be valuated at the price supplied by the vendor
    Hope this helps!!
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • MRP of Split valuation

    Dear all,
                we have activate Split Valuation,the secenero is like this,i have a material with two valuation type (RMindian & RM Import),we have requirement of RMINDIAN valuation type material is 4 & RMIMPORT is 5.after MRP i am getting a PR of 9 material.can we get seperalty PR for both the valuation Type.

    Dear Pavan,
    while defining raw material as part of BOM, enter valuation type in the batch field. Then system will plan according to valuation type.
    Regards

  • Canu00B4t use two step transfer with split valuation ?

    Hi people , i´ve activated split valuation for MaterialX , it has two Valuation types ( Production and Purchase ) . The problem arose when i tried to do a two step transfer between plants ( mov 303 ) and i got the following error msg :
    Use one-step procedure for transfer posting to mat. subj. to valuation
    Message no. M7048
    Diagnosis
    In the receiving plant, the material is subject to split valuation. For this material, a stock transfer cannot be carried out using the two-step procedure.
    Procedure
    Use the one-step procedure (movement type 301) or a stock transfer order for the stock transfer.
    The message is very clear itself , but... i just wonder if there`s actually any way to avoid this, considering that having to create a transfer order for each movement will duplicate work and using a one step transfer won´t be practical. I tried to change the error msg into a warning but couldn´t find it in customizing. Thanks for any comments on this !

    First of all , thanks everyone for the help.
    Csaba Szommer, Kunal ingale  , i read the OSS note and the pdf and indeed everything confirms it´s not possible to do the two step movement. So , i tried the stock transport order and something else appeared here. When creating this type of order , the system first ask for a Supplying Plant , then you can populate the material , quantity and the destination plant. But then it asks for the Valuation Type of the material involved, and it seems this field is Mandatory . Is it possible to make this field on the transport order as optional ? I couldn´t find this field at SPRO-MM-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Define Screen Layout at Document Level .
    I need this field to be optional for the following reason. In my company there´s a relation between two plants , Plant A ( from where products are dispatched to the customer ) and Plant B ( where the material is produced with valuation type "Production" and sometimes is buyed from vendors with valuation type "Purchase" ) . The idea is to run an MRP which will generate the material needs on Plant A considering the Sales Orders. This need will be then transformed (automatically by MRP ) in Stock Transport Orders with Supplying Plant "Plant B" and receiving "Plant A". The problem here is that , at the moment of the transport order creation it´s no possible to know which will be the valuation type of the material that will satisfy the need. I mean , Plant B ( production and buying plant ) will check the list of needs for Plant A and then will decide which material ( with which Valuation Type ) they will provide considering the actual stock levels at the time of the MRP run.
    In a few words, i see the only way to do a two step transfer of a split valuated material is using Stock Transport Orders , is there a way to make the field "Valuation Type" optional ?. The idea would be to choose the Valuation Type of the material at the moment of the Good Issue.  Thanks a lot , once again.
    Edited by: Christian  Len on Jul 7, 2008 3:16 PM

  • Material Split Valuation : Procurement Domestic & Import

    Dear CO Experts,
    I m in a situation where my client has a Raw Material (RM), which is procured domestic & also imported. This RM is attached to a single FG in a BoM.
    Do differentiate domestic & import procurement, they have used Split Valuation.
    The reason behind such a decision is, since that RM is very sensitive and delay could not be affordable.
    Clients are now requesting to have a seperate view of Standard Cost Estimate based on Slipt Valuation. We have observed that execution of Standard Cost Estimate picks only RM which is based on local currency.
    Please help me to understand & few steps of missing config, how to have a dual view (based on Slipt Valuation) of Standard Cost Estimate.
    Regards,
    Hussein.

    Hi Hussein
    Two RMs are required - But its not a good option... It creates lot of probs in MRP if you have duplicate codes...
    Two FGs are not required if you go for 2 RMs....
    a. You can create 2 BOMs... The RM will be different in each BOM
    b. Routing may be the same
    c. Create 2 Prod versions i.e. BOM 1 + Routing = PV1 and BOM2 + Routing = PV2
    d. Create 2 Proc Alternatives in CK91N using the Prod 2 Versions
    e. Create a Mix ratio in CK94 i.e. weighing factor that you can assign to each PV
    f. Calculate cost from CK11N... Costs will be calculated separately for each PV and at the end system would apply the mix ratio specified in CK94
    Eg: Cost of PV1 = 100 and Cost of PV2 = 120... If mix ratio is 50:50 - Then Std cost would be 110 (100 * 0.5 + 120 * 0.5)
    From my experience - I would advise you to drop your requirement and educate your client about the same... have one single raw material (you can use Split Valuatoin) and use the Average price for Std cost... While execution - The cost of consumption would be charged as per Domestic or Import... This would hence, reflect the price variance....
    br, Ajay M

  • Only price control "V" is possible for split valuation'

    Hi
    For  semi finished items price control has been assigned as 'V'.when i am trying to change the same to S' I got the error message is"Only price control "V" is possible for split valuation''.Even i checked and corrected the MRP views in Material master.
    Can any one help me to sort out this issue
    Regards,
    P.Selvakumar

    Hi,
    I guess that you are getting the error message M3 185  ('Only price control "V" is            
    possible for split valuation').   This message is correct.                                                                               
    ONLY materials with Moving Average Price can use the split valuation          
    function.                                                                               
    The reason is the following one:                                                                               
    If there are 2 valuation types, named X and Y.                                                                               
    There is an equality:                                                                               
    Material pricetotal quantity = Price Xquantity X + Price Y*quantity Y                                                                               
    In order to balance,                                                                               
    When X and Y is 'V', the header material should use 'V'.                      
    When X is 'V', Y is 'S', the header material should use 'V'.                  
    When X and Y is 'S', the header material should use 'V'.                                                                               
    So only price control V is possible for split valuation.                                                                               
    In accordance with the text of the message M3185, split valuation             
    requires the price code 'V' (moving average price) for the header             
    record.                                                                               
    Please, refer to the SAP Library (http://help.sap.com) documentation          
    under the menu path (for your current release level, 470):                                                                               
    MM - Material Price Change (MM-IV-MP)                                         
    -> Split Valuation                                                            
       -> Creating Material Subject to Split Valuation                                                                               
    "Creating Material Subject to Split Valuation:                                                                               
    1. First create a valuation header record for this material. This is            
       where the individual stocks of a material are managed cumulatively.                                                                               
    To do this, fill in the Valuation category field on the accounting           
       screen when you create the material master record and leave the              
       Valuation type field blank. In the Price control field, enter V              
       (moving average price), since a moving average price is constructed          
       in the valuation header record from the values and quantities of the         
       individual stocks. When you save, the system creates the valuation           
       header record.                                                                               
    2. Then create the material for a valuation type.                               
       To do this, call up the material in creation mode again. Due to the          
       fact that a valuation header record exists, the system requires you          
       to enter a valuation type for the valuation category.                                                                               
    3. Repeat step two for every valuation type planned."                                                                               
    In order for the system to take into account the different values of            
    the substocks, the material at the header level must necessarily have           
    a 'moving average price' (V) control.                                           
    Regards,
    MLM

  • Sales BOM Split Valuation Routine

    Hi,
    I do have Sales BOM, I do have split valuation in place.  How to Standard cost a Material which has only Sales BOM and do not have a routine etc.  In procurement alternative, what are the necessary entries I have to make, if this is to be costed.?
    Kindly clarify.
    Ashok

    Hi
    IMG > Controlling > Prod Cost Contr > Cost Obj Contr > Prod cost by sales order > Control of sales order related > Req Classes & req Type
    In Req class - You have fields like Costing ID, Costing method, etc which would determine whether SO cost estimate is to be run or not
    Also, you have field VALUATION in req class - which specifies whether to valuate the inventory based on SO cost estimate or not
    The Link is Account Assignment Category assigned to Req class; req Class to Req Type AND
    Req Type is either assigned to SD item category OR to PP MRP Group / Strategy group
    Hope this helps
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Automatic STO for materials with split valuation

    Hey Gurus,
    Our client uses plant-to-plant STO to do transfers among internal plants. The current process: Run MRP in receiving plants --> MRP generates PReq --> Release PReq --> Assign Preq and create STO(from here, buyers manually check stock at issuing plant to see if there are "New" or "Rebuild" stock available, Rebuild stock always take the priority. Buyers manually assign Rebuild or New to ME21N).
    The client tries to automate the STO process, ie, using ME59 or ME59N instead of ME21N. The problem is how the system does stock check and automatically enters"Rebuild" or "New" for materials with Split Valuation, which are done by buyers manually?
    Thanks
    JM

    Hello,
    Your client's request can be met with an user exit i guess. I have not used this but this is a suggestion that you can try if you wish.
    The following things need to be done.
    1. New PR type needs to be created and assinged to the STO document type.
    2. When running a MRP at receiving plant, the system uses the special procurement key to create the STO requisition, hence we can write the relevant code in user exit in the MRP program. (please find the user exit for MD01)
    3. If the special procurement key is 40 in the material master (MRP view), then system has to create the PR using the new PR type for STO. Also for those PRs the default batch should be "Rebuilt" entered while creating the PR.
    4. As the batch is already entered in the PR, converting them to PO automatically will not be an issue.
    if you feel that the above solution is little tough to implement, then please write a program to fetch the STO PRs and update the PRs one by one using the BAPI PR update or BDC with the batch "Rebuilt". This program you can ask the users to run before using ME59.
    Regards,
    Sakthi

  • Split valuation: how to close an annual PO

    Dear Experts,
    We need to change a non-split valuated material to split valuated mode by using the Valuation category 'X'. I  have done the required config. and cleared all of the stocks and reservations. Now we have one "annual" purchase order left (line per month) that is partly closed and partly open. I flagged all of the items as completely delivered and invoiced but it still comes to the material Display errors log. Do I need to throw all of the items to the carbage bin or even archive the PO before I can change the Valuation category in the material master?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi
    If the PO is partially open ensure that the PO order qty is changed to Delivered and invoiced qty and then flag the delivery completed and final invoice indicator and then flag the item for deletion.
    Now you try to activate the valuation category.
    Usually if we have such requiremnt of activating the material for split valution, always you create a new material and falg the old material for deletion. This will be helpful in the reporting parts also.
    You donot have to face all these problems in that case.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Split valuation with batch management and project stock

    Dear Gurus,
    I need to combine two following requirements:
    1. split valuation with batch management (valuation type = batch number)
    2. project stock
    These two functionalities work fine separately but not together.
    I receipt PO for material with spiit valuation on a batch level into a project stock. Posting is OK and material document (MSEG table) seems to be OK (batch number, valuation type and project stock are in this table). The problem appears when I want to display material in this valuation type (MM03) or batch (MSC3n). They don't exist!!!  Short investigation showed that during goods receipt table MBEW (valuated stock) was not updated with this valuation type.
    But If PO is receipt into normal stock first and then posted into project stock everything is OK.
    Have you had or heart about such issue? I would appreciate any sugestion. 
    Thsnks in advance.
    Marcin Bernat

    Hi,
    As you already know ,u are using project stock and doing goods receipt against project, stock table QBEW will be updated and not MBEW. MBEW only updates in case of plant stock valuation. If u receive any goods against project stock it does not contribute to plant stock. Irrespective whether your material is managed in split valuation or not, If it is received against project stock it only updates QBEW. There is no need to update MBEW, if u r using split valuation in project. QBEW also have valuation type as another level like MBEW. If u want to see material price for project stock, it can be  seen in QBEW -valuation type and not in mm03.
    As u r receiving goods against project stock this is d only reason QBEW is updated and not MBEW.
    QBEW will store all information like MBEW for batch number, valuation type and project stock assignment.
    Hope it answers your question.
    Deepak.

  • Split Valuation For Material Having No Open PO & Stock

    Hi Experts,
    Will somebody throw light on split valuation where there is no any open PR, PO & Stock for that material but system does not allow to make material split valuated.
    System shows error meassge giving old PO nos list.
    (Logically all these POS whole business transcations/cycle is  completed )
    I want split valaution to be done to the material whose stock is nil also there is no any open PR,PO for that plant in the system.
    But I dont prefer to delete line items of the old PO for doing the split valuation.
    Please suggest solution
    Thanks in advance.
    Ramesh
    Edited by: RameshChandra  Soni on May 17, 2008 11:46 AM

    Hi,
    You can find severaé threads about this on this forum.
    Some hints:
    1. In MM02 try to set the split valuation > Save > SAP will give error message > Push the appearing 'Display errors' button > SAP will say what hinders you from being able to set the split valuation.
    2. As I remember stock has to be zero in current and previous period. (You can set your stock to zero in the previous period using MB1A201posting date in the past; after having set split valuation you can reset your stock level via MB1A+202).
    3. IMPORTANT: you have to archive all existing batch records.
    4. etc
    BR
    Csaba

  • Split Valuation- Net Price Problem in Po

    Dear All,
           The Split Valuation confiigured for Material as
           Val Type(A)- Ex Procurement
           Val Type(B)- Internal House Production.
    assigned Valuation Category(C) with A & B and with Plant.
    In Material Master Accounting view enter all the reqired inputs
    First i Created PR and its ok and go for PO, it asking " net Price" and entered the Net Price, again it showing error msg " net price greater than 0.
      Note: for this material PIR, Source List require or not.
           so what i done a mistake? and can any one explain it.
    Thanks

    net price always remains exclusive freight/delivery cost.
    the freight/delivery cost gets added on the net price
    so going by logic the calculation which ur system is showing is perfect.
    "Re PO: As per you, only net value will be displayed in PO and effective price will not display . why?"
    this is becoz it shows the price of that particular material per unit.
    regards,
    indranil

  • Split valuation Issues in PO

    Hi Consultant,
    I have one issue with Split valuation -configuration. I have maintained all the configuration setting related to split valuation but whenever I will create PO system does not pick-up the price (different price based on the valuation type in material ) .
    The following configuration have done in IMG:
    i) Activated split valuation
    II) Maintain valuation category under this group in to three valuation types.
    III) Activate Plant, (assign into valuation type)
    Maintain condition table with key combination (material/plant/price/val.type)
    Assign into condition type PB00
    Maintain condition records in MEK1 (for this material)
    Maintained one header material with valuation category then same material has extended to different valuation types and prices.
    Is it necessary to maintain Info record for the split valuated material? 
    Why system does not valuate the price automatically based in the valuation type changes made in PO?
    Regards,
    Thiru

    Hi Consultant,
    I have one issue with Split valuation -configuration. I have maintained all the configuration setting related to split valuation but whenever I will create PO system does not pick-up the price (different price based on the valuation type in material ) .
    The following configuration have done in IMG:
    Hi, Thiru,
    Please check the settings for configuration of split valuation;
    If you want to use split valuation, activate the settings found in customizing for material management under
    Valuation and Account Assignment--> Split Valuation-->Activate Split Valuation
    Define valuation category and a valaution type.
    Valuation category determines the criteria for distinguishing between stocks.The valuation type decribes the possible features of the partial stocks.
    You define valuation category, valuation types and assignment of types to categories in customizing for material management
    Valuation and Account Assignment--> Split Valuation-->Configure  Split Valuation
    Also first check you material master record with MM03 by selecting the desired organization levels and see whether the valuation prices are showing as per desired valuation type.
    Also would like to add that info records are not required in split valuation.
    Regards,
    Tushar Patankar

  • SPLIT VALUATION - EXT/INT PO Indicator- OMWC

    Hi,
         Could someone help me understanding this?
         While Configuring Split Valuation, for a Valuation Type I've set the 'EXT PO' indicator as '0' and associated it to a Valuation Category( No default Valuation Type has been set). After associating the Valuation Category and the Valuation Types to a material, I tried creating a PO for the same. It allowed me to create a PO, with the Valuation Type for which the EXT PO is set as '0'.
    What I inferred from the settings is that it should have thorwn an error. Have I inferred correctly or else am missing out somewhere. Also, please help me to understand the significance of 'Acct Category Reference' in 'OMWC' Tcode (P.S: Could appreciate the use of Acct Categ Ref in Automatic Account Determination ie Valuation Class determination. But the Significance of Acct Categ Ref. in Split Valuation Type still remains vague.)
    TIA,
    Regards,
    S. Satish

    Hi Prabhu,
      Thank You very much for your time.
                      The Valuation Type is as follows
                       INDI     EXT PO Indicator '0'.
                    The Valuation type 'INDI', got defaulted from the Inforecord in the PO created. The PO is a standard PO.
                  Since for 'INDI', the EXT PO is set as '0', ie Not allowed, should I expect an error in this case ( In actual it did not occur. I            suppose it should. Correct me if am wrong).
    Acct category Reference is concerned:
         Is it that the Acct Category Reference chosen in the Valuation Type configuration, would surpass the Acct Category ref set for the Material Type?
    Ie) if the Acct category ref for 'ROH' is say 0001. If I assign this Material Type for a material and still could I assign a Valuation Category associated to say HALB ( I know in real time, its not possible. But would like to understand if the system validates).
    Regards,
    S. Satish

Maybe you are looking for