SRM 5.0 Approval WF fragment has no user assignment
Hi,
While changing approvers in the approval preview the system displays message 'Approval Workflow fragment has no user assignment'. In our case WS10000271 and TS10407972 are both set as general tasks. Any idea why the system would be generating this message?
Thanks,
Jerry
Hello,
If all your task are classified as general, this is a bug in a FM (SRM5, SP4). No idea if a note exist for this but check source of function BBP_PDH_WFL_APP_ASSIGNTYPE_GET, the task type (WF, TS) is hard coded, you may want to change it )
FUNCTION bbp_pdh_wfl_app_assigntype_get.
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*" IMPORTING
*" VALUE(IV_TASK) TYPE SWD_STEP_T OPTIONAL
*" EXPORTING
*" VALUE(EV_ASSIGNMENT) TYPE CHAR1
*" TABLES
*" ET_POSSIBLE_AGENTS STRUCTURE SWHACTOR OPTIONAL
DATA:
lv_general_task LIKE p1217-general,
lt_related_agents TYPE swhactor OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
lv_task TYPE swd_step_t.
*{ INSERT DE2K901025 1
*PVA correction
data: lv_otype type OTYPE.
lv_otype = iv_task(2).
*} INSERT
lv_task = iv_task+2.
evaluate the agent assignment of the whole workflow fragment
CALL FUNCTION 'RH_TASK_AGENTS_INDEX'
EXPORTING
*{ REPLACE DE2K901025 2
*\ task_otype = 'WS'
*PVA correction
task_otype = lv_otype
*} REPLACE
task_objid = lv_task "workflow fragment
IMPORTING
act_general = lv_general_task
TABLES
related_agents = et_possible_agents
EXCEPTIONS
no_active_plvar = 1
no_agents_of_task_found = 2
no_task_otype = 3
OTHERS = 4.
Rgds,
Pierre
Similar Messages
-
"Approval workflow fragment has no user assignment" while adding approver
Hi all,
We are on SRM 5.0 ECS.
We are facing an issue in our quality system while this issue doesnt come up in dev system!
if I try change a PO and then click on the ADD APPROVER button and then on the link "ADD HERE".,I get the foll pop up msg :
"Approval workflow fragment has no user assignment".Hi experts,
Any advice? -
Error "Approval workflow fragment has no user assignment"
Hi all,
We are implementing the workflow for n level approval of SC WS14000133.Now when we try to add adhoc approvers by clicking on the ADD APPROVER button,we get the foll error:
"Approval workflow fragment has no user assignment".
I have already referred similar threads on SDN and also the corresponding notes including this one,Error "Approval workflow fragment has no user assignment".The latest note for this error applies for SP08 while we are on SRM server 5.5(SP11).
Has anybody faced a similar issue before?Any inputs will be appreciated.
regards,
SRM Tech.Hi SRM_TECH,
I am facing the issue. i am also in SRM5.5 and SP11. since i you are in the same SP level can you please help me out how did you fix this issue..
Thanks,
John. -
Inquire button is greyed out in SRM 7.0 Approval screen
Hi Friends,
Any one faced an issue that the functionality 'inquire button' is greyed out in the SRM 7.0 approval screen. I have given Approval with Completion in the level type in SPRO. still i am not able to see the 'inquire button' in the approval screen. Any input on this issue..
John.Fixed my self
-
SRM 7.0 Approver deleted after SC is ordered
Hello Experts,
I have created a 4 process level with custom expressions and agents for SC. All the approvers and agents are determined at each level successfully, however on the Financial approval level the agents are refreshed/disappear when the SC is Ordered.The FI approval event is attached to a boolean constant expression which always returns TRUE.
Request you to kindly help me with this issue.
Thanks in advance!
Regards
PrasunaHi Saravanan,
Thank you for the response.
1 .You mean , you can see the Financial approval process level before ordering the SC , but it gets disappear after ordering the SC?
Yes, It appears in the approval process overview and disappears after ordering the SC.
2. boolean constant expression which always returns TRUE ?
what do you mean.. have you decalred 0ev000 event as evalauation id for this process level.. what do you see SLG1?
I meant i have created a Bollean expression that always returns true.
I checked in SLG1, the expression is evaluated as true.
3. Financial approval has correct role assigned in it?
Check 2 & 3
I did not understand your question in point 3... Do you mean to refer to the role of the Users determined as approvers?
Regards
Prasuna -
An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system TEC101
Hello all
We are trying to send an message RFC or IDOC from our SRM (5.0) system to the XI (7.0). But we allways get the error
"An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system TEC101". In the SLD the system is visible, sldcheck works.
Does anyone know this problem and can give me a hint how to fix this problem?
Thanks a lot
StefanHi Stefan,
Is there a technical & Business System for SRM5.0 in SLD? If entry exists then confirm if the logical system name mentioned in Business System is TEC101.
If entry does not exist in SLD for SRM, then in SRM run t-code
1) SLDAPICUST .. Enter relevant details
2) RZ70 : Give XI Server details , activate and then Execute.
Once you do that you can see entry for SRM in SLD.
After that try running the schenario again.
Regards,
Sumit -
SLD system has not been assigned ? :-(
Hi Guys,
This is an easy question for SRM gurus =)
I need to send the PO in format XML to the vendors (using XI). When I try to send a PO I can see this error message in "Issue Purchase Order" option menu.
Information Date: 13.06.2006 Time: 10:19:38
Information Processing BBP_PO_SEND_XML Is Started
Error An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system SRDCLNT120
Error Action could not be successfully executed
Could anybody give me any help about this ? I have searched in sdn and oss without success =(
Thanks for your help !
Regards,
DiegoHi Christophe, my feedback:
A) In "Define backend system", I entered the XI alias name defined in tx: SLDAPICUST
B) Now the process doesnt throw any error in SRM, but the PO document is not arriving to XI neither =(
My questions are:
1. Should I put that alias in that field ? Or should I put the SLD server name? Should be an RFC conn name to XI?
2. Should I do anything additional to point 1? For example: in tx. SLBBP_RFCDEST the PO scenario is directed to "BBP_XML_PO". Should I made a change on this ?
Thanks for your help !
Best regrads,
Diego -
Regarding "Error An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system "
Hi all,
I am trying to connect SRM system to an XI system. All the settings are done (or I thought so). When I try to send a PO via XML/XI to the XI system in SRM Web UI, it gives me the following error:
nformation Processing BBP_PO_SEND_XML Is Started
Error An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system
Error Action could not be successfully executed
The backend systems are defined in spro. When I debugged the coding, I find that the right Logical system itself is not picked up - is there any thing missed out?
Thanks,
VijayHi,
You should assign this here:
Supplier Relationship Management -> SRM Server -> Technical Basic Settings -> Define Backend Systems.
Here you should fill the "System Landscape Directory Name" for the systems you have defined.
Regards
Kathirvel -
An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system
Hi masters
I trying send PO in XML to SUS through XI ,
but when try to send the SRM/EB system show the next message
Processing BBP_PO_SEND_XML Is Started
An SLD system has not been assigned to logical system
Action could not be successfully executed
in XI system I defined the SLD sistem for SRM/EB and SRM/SUS
that SLD name is settup into define system Landscape into colum System Land Directory Name
in SLDCHECK all is Ok on green light.
what can I do ?Hi. Nikhil.
In SRM/EB
1.- trying configurates SMXB_ADM
2.- Integratio Engine configration
3.- Role of Business System = Application System
4.- Corresponding Integ. Server = dest://RFC type H for XI system,
problem .
when I push bottom check (F7)
the message is the next
red light No access to system Landscape at present -
One Portal user has several user in other systems - how to handle SSO
Hi,
I read a lot through several threads but could not really find the information that I need:
Problem:
Each PERSON has ONLY ONE unique portal user to log in. In SAP SRM / EBp these persons sometimes must have multiple users. Normally they login in than with TIMO1 or TIMO2 etc..
But how can we handle that with SSO?
The SOO cookie will always login only one explicit user.
Such that I thought about a BSP application or something in-between: Portals opens this custom application via SSO. The application deletes the SSO cookie and depending on the selected user it will login the user to EPb / SRM.
Who has any Ideas how to realize that. Or is there a better possibility for that?
Thanks for HELP
TIMOHello Guys ...
thanks for the posts, but I think I did not make realy clear what I need:
SOO works fine, that is OK.
But I need to login from the portal, being loged in as user 1243243 (we use numbers) into EBp (SRM) as JOHN or JOHN2. Depending on the company I would like to shop for.
I am aware of the fact, that SAP Portal offers something like user-mapping. But we would like to avoid aditional maintenance in the Portal area (internal reasond). So user-mapping in the portal is no option.
I think I realy need such a "LOGIN APPLICATION" inbetween
PORTAL - LOGIN APP - SRM
Thanks 4 your help! -
Webdynpro - Check if a portal user has a user in R/3 Backend
Hi Experts,
i have following problem, and maybe some of you can help me out with an idea or (much better) a solution:
Our Company is running an Enterprise Portal on NW2004s (SPS 18). Currently i am developing a Java WebDynpro Application for the portal called Transactionstarter. Withhin this application a portal user can simply add a backend System (R/3), a transaction and a Description. This information will be stored in a xml file in userhome in KM. When the user clicks the description, SAP WinGui will open with the transaction he defined before. We use SSO for opening the transaction if the user has a backend user. If not, the loginscreen of the backend will appear.
All this works fine.
Now we have the requirement for an automated system check.
The portal user can run an initial system check. This system check should check all configured backend systems if the portal user has a user in R/3 backend.
But how can i check if my portal user exists in backend?
I cannot use JCO because we have a lot of Systems (more than 300 all together) and i don´t want to create a destination for every system. Or did i misunderstood something with JCO?
Does anyone of you have a solution, how i can check every system, if the portal user has also a backend user?
Thanks in advance.
Regards
PascalHi Pascal,
with JCO you can use also the method JCO.createClient:
public static JCO.Client createClient(java.lang.String client,
java.lang.String user,
java.lang.String passwd,
java.lang.String lang,
java.lang.String mshost,
java.lang.String r3name,
java.lang.String group)
Creates an instance of a client connection to a remote SAP system (with load balancing)
Parameters:
client - SAP logon client
user - SAP logon user
passwd - SAP logon password
lang - SAP logon language
mshost - Host name of the message server
r3name - Name of the SAP system
group - Name of the group of application servers
Returns:
the newly created client
for connections to other systems. So you can avoid to create destinations
Regards
Matteo
Edited by: Matteo Fusi on Apr 1, 2009 11:33 AM -
My ipad recognizes my home network but will not connect to the internet. When I click on AirPort/preferences at the top of the imac screen it says..."AirPort has a self-assigned ip address and may not connect to the internet". If this is the root of the problem,how can I change ip address?
Ipad will connect no problem to other networks.First thing you need I think is to get your iMac connected to the Internet.
Shut down your iMac and you iPad. Then power off your router. Wait 30 seconds and power up the router.
After the router indicates that it is connected to the Internet then start up your iMac and see if it connects. If the iMac connects to the Internet then your iPad should too.
If this power up sequence doesn't work you'll have to dig into the router setup to make sure it is working properly. -
APP-FND-01929: This responsibility has already been assigned to this user
Dear All,
While adding a new responsibility in the User Screen, I am getting the following Error:
APP-FND-01929: This responsibility has already been assigned to this user. Please eneter a different responsibility.
But in the list of responsibilities this particular responsibility is not added before..
What will be the cause of this problem..
How can I overcome this situation.. Please update...
Many Thanks in advance.....Hi,
As per your other thread, I believe you have restored couple of tables from your backup and this is not supported. In order to have everything running properly, then a full database restore should be done.
Unable to login to application..
Unable to login to application..
Regards,
Hussein -
A unique company code has not been assigned to company number 1000
Dear Friends,
When I do Inter-Company Transaction thro Transaction Code FB60 it is giving me Error.
For Example: if I have 2 Company Codes - 8001 & 8002
I want to Post One Vendor Invoice
Ex:
Vendor - 301 ABC Ltd., 5000 Credit
400020 - Expenses 2000 Debit - Company Code - NGLC
(Then Debit Expenses G/L Account 460000 for Company Code NGLC1)
400020 - Expenses 3000 Debit - Company Code - 1000
(Then Debit Expenses G/L Account 460100 for Company Code 1000)
When I am going to POST it is giving me an Error please sees below.
Error Message
A unique company code has not been assigned to company number 1000
Message no. GLT0001
Diagnosis
Document breakdown is active in your system. In certain cases, a company code is derived from the company ID number, and this must lead to the assignment of a unique company code.
A unique company code could not be assigned to company number 1000.
System Response
You cannot carry out the required posting.
Procedure
Assign one company code to company number 1000.
Please tell me How to solve this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
RangaHi Ranga
Can you please check OBY6 settings (Additional details) for the co. codes, as it seems either multiple co. codes have been assinged to company number 1000 or none of the relevant co. codes have been assigned with company ID.
Regards -
When configuring a new Unity Voicemail Account I receive this message : The phone number or extension has already been assigned to some other object. I understand that this means that the 10 digit number I am trying to configure as the alternate extension for this user is already configured for another object with Unity.
I need to search by the 10 digit number and determine where it is configured so I can change it and map to the correct end user.
I have attempted to to search Users via DTMF Access ID using the 10 digit number with nothing being returned via that search.
How do I Search all of the copnfigured Alternate Extensions within our Unity Server?A subscriber info dump is likely the fastest way. If you're curious regarding other methods, you can also use the Data Link Explorer (CUDLE) tool which is in the Cisco Unity Tools Depot. All extensions for all objects are referenced in the "DTMFAccessId" table. The View menu has a Query Builder which you can use to compile a SQL query that searches for a digit string. It's best to search for both the 10 digit string as well as an abbreviated string as Unity sees them essentially the same and they are usually should be associated with a single subscriber. Once you find a match, you can use the "ParentObjectId" value associated with the DTMF access ID to look for a matching owner in the "GlobalSubscriber" table. The ParentObjectId should match the SubscriberObjectId for a subscriber (assuming the DTMF access ID is assigned to a subscriber). This is the same thing as looking at SQL; however, you are not directly accessing the DB so this is generally considered the safest way to browse and get a feel for where things are.
Hailey
Maybe you are looking for
-
i have been trying to upload more music to my iphone 3gs but whenever i try to even click on the artist or name buttons in itunes they dont get highlighted or anything all i can do is play music from my phone through itunes ... if you know of anythin
-
Hi, I turned my MacBook Pro off before I went to sleep, and this morning when I awaken. I can't seem to turn up or down my volume. It comes up with all the volume bars and a little circle sign with a diagonal line in the middle, like a stop sign. I h
-
Hi, Here is a purchase rebate scenario: The supplier sell goods only to certain customers at discount price. Eg. If the market price for an item is $10/EA the supplier sell the item for $7/EA for few customers. The PO will be issued with the market p
-
okay so about 10 minutes ago i was sitting down and had my phone charging in my lap, i didn't do anything differently and then all of a sudden my screen flashed on then off then on and off and so on about 5 or 6 times rapidly, now my power button won
-
Suddenly I can only see the text in my emails in my Iphones icloud-mail. If I check it out on Iclouds webmail the message looks empty/blank? Only from certain users. Started last week, and it doesnt matter which computer I use, but seems to work in s