SSRS Report for Incidents/Work Items Created or Closed over time

I'm curious if anyone has developed a custom report based off the DWDataMart that displays the count for creation of incidents or other work items over time or work items that are closed over time.

Hi Jon,
There is a blog, which talks about in detail regarding SCSM reporting,
http://scug.be/scsm/2012/04/10/working-with-scsm-reporting/
However related to your queries please refer to this,
http://blogs.technet.com/b/servicemanager/archive/2010/04/23/how-to-create-a-custom-report-and-display-it-in-the-console.aspx
Thanks,
Mohammad.
-Zakir, Let us know if the answer/post helps you :)

Similar Messages

Creating a report for linked work items...

We are using TFS 2012 and need to create a report (either excel or SSRS) that shows all the user stories under the current sprint and any linked child items across two projects. I can do this easily per project in VS and open it in excel but excel won't
let me copy/paste two projects work items in one spreadsheet. I tried searching and found a few suggestions but they don't seem to work.
TIA,
Vik

Hi Vik,
Thanks for your post.
We suggest you create a such report using TFS API. Please refer to below code snippet:
            TfsTeamProjectCollection tfs = new TfsTeamProjectCollection(new Uri("UrI"));
            tfs.EnsureAuthenticated();
            WorkItemStore workitemstore = tfs.GetService<WorkItemStore>();
            string wiql ="SELECT * FROM WorkItems WHERE [System.TeamProject] = 'TeamProject' ORDER BY [System.Id] ";
            WorkItemCollection wic = workitemstore.Query(wiql);
            foreach(WorkItem workitem in wic)
            if(workitem.Links.Count!=0)
                foreach (Link link in workitem.Links)
                    RelatedLink relatedLink = link as RelatedLink;
                    if (relatedLink != null)
                        Console.WriteLine(relatedLink.RelatedWorkItemId);
You can create your custom work item query to return all the parent work items, then save this query as a .wiq file in local path, then open this .wiq file and you will find the wiql string in it.
For more information about work item query TFS API, please refer to:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb130306.aspx.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How can I specify an area path for the work item created on build failure?

In our department we are working with multiple build definitions for different parts of one Team project. We heavily use the Team Project feature. Teams are defined by area path nodes, so each team can only see it's area path. No one (except the admins)
can see the root project node.
When a build breaks, TFS generates a Bug. Unfortunately, this bug is assigned to the area path root node, so nobody can see the generated bug and act on it.
We would prefer to specify the area path for the generated work item in the build definition (not template, but property of a build definition), as every build belongs exclusively to one team.
I have found that you can populate fields of the generated work item by filling the "custom fields" of the "create work item" activity. But how do I set the area path as a parameter?
Guenter

Hi Cuenter,
Thanks for your post.
You should set the value like below in that activity:
New
Dictionary(Of
String,
String)
From {{"Area
Path",
"teamprojectname\areaname"}}
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

SAP QUERY report for vendor line items

Hi
I have created a SAP QUERY report for vendor line items with fields vendor no.,vendor name,amount,company code and period.But there is one line item i donot know from wher system is getting it picked with is not in that vedor account,when i compare with fbl1n.I checked the document number too...the same doc number is twice in my query report.One with correct amount and another with wrong one.How do i chk.Where did i go wrong in creating query.I used logical database KDF.
Please advise.

i chked...how do we get the amount displayed in query...it just displays amount no debit credit symbol... i have selected BSEG-DMBTR field but no -/+ sign,how is it done in query,please suggest.

Report workload by calculating how many versions of SharePoint list items created in a certain time period

I have a total of 66 SharePoint 2010 lists - yes, 66! - each lists contains between 1500 and 3200 list items. My employees update these various list items throughout their workday. Each update to a list item creates a new version of the list
item. On average each list item will have anywhere from 5 to 10 versions before it is done. I need to create a report that tells me how many list items they've updated in a certain time frame. I have come close but still cannot arrive at
the data I'm looking for.
This is what I have so far:
I've created a report using SQL Report Builder 2008 v3 where I've filtered it to show only items MODIFIED between, for example, Feb1 and Feb28. Of those records, I want the report to tell me how many versions were created during that time
frame. The result is one list item with 5 total versions. Versions 1.0, 2.0, & 3.0 were created on 12/12/14. The last two versions, 4.0 and 5.0, were created on 2/24/15. Therefore, the answer I'm looking for is 2 because they
created 2 versions between Feb1 and Feb28.
However I get the following results using these queries:
If I do a =Sum(Fields!owshiddenversion.Value) in the expression field I get the total versions which is 5
If I do a =Count(Fields!owshiddenversion.Value) in the expression field I get the instance which is 1
Is there a way to count ONLY the number of versions created in a time period? Is there another hidden field in SharePoint that I can use in the expression that will give me results I'm looking for?

Hi Rafael70,
Per my understanding that you have already get all the need fields and informaiton of the updated version of list items and now you want to calculate how many versions of SharePoint list items created in a certain time period, you can't get desired result
using sum and count function, right?
I have tried to tested on my local environment but because I am not clear what is value in the field "owshiddenversion", I assumed you have two datatype parameters (StartDate and EndDate) to help filter the report in a certain time period.
Generally, if you have add the filter correctly, it will filter the correct number's updated version in this time period, I would like you to provide details information as below to help better analysis the requirements:
Could you please provide sample data of the table.
Please provide snapshot of the report structure you have currently designed.
Please try to provide all the expression you have used.
If you still have any problem, please feel free to ask.
Regards,
Vicky Liu
Vicky Liu
TechNet Community Support

How can I activate drill down report for planned line items please urgent?

Hi Everyone,
Please suggest me how can i activate drill down report for planned line items in internal orders. S_ALR_87012993. Please suggest me, I'll award full points. I am unable to do it in client system, which has already line items. I tried in my sys with new config it is working.
Kind regards
Arvey.

Hi
It is based on the reports attached in the Report Group - TCODE: GR53
In the Report Group screen
Press CONFIGURE This is to attach any Drill Down reports.
Press the Insert Line icon
As is the screen may be used to insert a Report Writer report group. To add an ABAP, press other report type
Double click on ABAP Reports
Enter the name of the ABAP and ENTER
<b>RCOPCA08 Profit Center: Plan Line Items</b>
VVR

Authorization to disable SAP Inbox Forward function for specific Work Items

Hi.
I recently solved a case for a customer of mine regarding authorizations for work items. They have several workflows running, but for this specific custom developed workflow, users should not be allowed to use the SAP Inbox Forward button.
I started by creating a new task classification (Z_FW) which I implemented on the workflow tasks where the forward functionality should be disabled. Now for test purposes I created a dummy user which I initially gave only authorization to the tcode SBWP, then I manually added the authorization object S_WF_WI.
For this entry I allowed all activities for work item type W and F for classification 1, 2, 3 and NO_CLASS (SAP Standard classification).
Now to my understanding this would give the test user authorization to perform all activities on Work Items and Workflows which are classified with one of the above, but also prevent me from doing anything with Workflows and Work Items with classification Z_FW.
However, to my surprise everything seems to work perfectly with just this entry. I am able to execute and forward work items with the standard classification, while I am able to execute, but not forward, work items with classification Z_FW.
My intention was to add another entry for authorization object S_WF_WI, for classification Z_FW with all activities except forwarding. But when I tried that, the only change was that forwarding was enabled for the work items with classification Z_FW, which I didnu2019t want.
Now can anyone explain to me why this is working? I am not too familiar with SAP Authorization as my area is mainly ABAP and WF, but his just does not seem logical.
Hoping someone can give me an explanation....
Thanks

Does the standard function not do what you want?
Task -> Additional data -> Agent Assignemt -> Maintain -> Attributes -> Forwarding not allowed.

Report for deleted line-items in Transfer Orders

Dear All,
Please help me in writing the code for "Report for deleted line-items in Transfer Orders".
regards,
nishu

Thanks. Repor completed.

View Memo option for a work item

Hello,
I am trying to include the "View Memo" option for a couple of different work items in UWL under the "You can also" section.
The View Memo shows up fine for one work item and doesn't show up for the other. However I have similar UWL configuration for both items.
Can any one suggest what is needed to include the View Memo option. I thought that the following tag should do it:
<Action reference="viewMemos"/>
The View Memo does not work for the following item: (Does not show up):
<ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.decision.TS20000131.ECCCLNT200" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.DisplayExpenseForm" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="ECCCLNT200" externalType="TS20000131" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <CustomAttributes>
        <CustomAttributeSource id="WEBFLOW_CONTAINER" objectIdHolder="externalId" objectType="WebflowContainer" cacheValidity="final">
          <Attribute name="TripNumber" type="string" displayName="Trip Number"/>
          <Attribute name="EmployeeNumber" type="string" displayName="Employee Number"/>
        </CustomAttributeSource>
      </CustomAttributes>
      <Actions>
        <Action reference="viewMemos"/>
       <Action reference="addMemo"/>
        <Action reference="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.DisplayExpenseForm"/>
        <Action name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.approver.ApproveTrip" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="no" launchInNewWindow="no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="decisionKey" value="1"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default="Approve Trip"/>
        </Action>
        <Action name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.approver.SendBackTrip" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="no" launchInNewWindow="no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="mandatory"/>
            <Property name="decisionKey" value="2"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default="Send Trip Back for Corrections"/>
        </Action>
        <Action name="com.sap.pct.erp.mss.tra.action.approver.RejectTrip" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="no" launchInNewWindow="no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="mandatory"/>
            <Property name="decisionKey" value="3"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default="Reject Trip"/>
        </Action>
      </Actions>
    </ItemType>
The View Memo option works fine for the following UWL item: (shows up fine)
<ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS20000189.ECCCLNT200" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchWebDynPro" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="ECCCLNT200" externalType="TS20000189" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <CustomAttributes>
        <CustomAttributeSource id="WEBFLOW_CONTAINER" objectIdHolder="externalId" objectType="WebflowContainer" cacheValidity="final">
          <Attribute name="TripNumber" type="string" displayName="Trip Number"/>
        </CustomAttributeSource>
      </CustomAttributes>
      <Actions>
        <Action reference="viewMemos"/>
        <Action reference="addMemo"/>
        <Action name="launchWebDynPro" groupAction="" handler="SAPWebDynproABAPLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=yes,menubar=yes,location=no,directories=no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="WebDynproApplication" value="FITE_EXPENSES"/>
            <Property name="newWindowFeatures" value="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=yes,menubar=yes,location=no,directories=no"/>
            <Property name="DynamicParameter" value="WI_ID=${item.externalId}"/>
            <Property name="openInNewWindow" value="yes"/>
            <Property name="SAP_FITV_TRIPNO" value="${item.TripNumber}"/>
            <Property name="SAP_FITV_ACTION" value="CHG"/>
            <Property name="System" value="SAP_ECC_HumanResources"/>
            <Property name="WebDynproNamespace" value="sap"/>
            <Property name="display_order_priority" value="5"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default="Correct Trip"/>
        </Action>
      </Actions>
    </ItemType>
Can anyone suggest what is the difference between the above two tasks.
Thank You,
Jaya R

Hi Jaya,
The reason why you are seeing this with the first task is because you are using the action handler UserDecisionHandler, more specifically UserDecisionNote. This is what defines the memo box. You can see the other workitem is not of type decision and is not using the UserDecisionHandler, therefore you can't just add a memo box. If you want to add a memo box to the other workitem, you will need to configure it like the first and check the decisions also in the backend system through the function module: SAP_WAPI_DECISION_READ or SWK_DECISION_READ. You can find more information here:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/7a/df014b037141ca9afc6433ed42b519/content.htm
Best Regards,
Beth Maben
EP - Senior Support Consultant
AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology
Please see the UWL Wiki @
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/bpx/uwl+faq ***

Invoice Workflow : Dialog work item created

Hi,
I am not fully aware of workflow but can manage to check the logs and status.
My question is: My Invoice workflow status is 'READY' but i dont know how to find to whom the work item it currently held.
When i check the log it says:
WF-BATCH Dialog work item created
How can i check, which approver currently held work item so that i can chase them to approve the item.
There are no agents assigned to the workflow and it is General Task.
I would apprecaite if you could share me some information about this.
Thanks,
Macs.

Hi,
About Invoice Workflow :
WS10400016 Without approval,
WS10400017 One-step approval,
WS10400018 Two-step approval,
WS10400021 Administrator approval
The relevant approval workflow is started, depending on completion status, invoice category (credit memo or invoice), creator role, and total value of the invoice.
You should have maintained approver in your org structure (PPOMA_BBP)
Please have a look at :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/58/c14e3c59bfe747e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Kind regards,
Yann

Failed to handle workitem...the instance/work item may be closed already.

I'm getting the following error in BPEL logs, can anybody tell me what the problem might be?
<PerformMessageHandler::handleLocal> Processing workitem perform message 7207-BpTer4-BpSwt1.29-1 for domain default
<AbortMessageHandler::handleLocal> Processing abort message 7207 for domain default
<PerformMessageHandler::handleLocal> Processing workitem perform message 7207-BpAss6-BpSeq11.26-1 for domain default
<CubeEngineBean::handleWorkItem> Failed to handle workitem "7207-BpAss7-BpSeq13.27-1"; the instance/work item may be closed already.
<BaseDispatchSet::acknowledge> Acknowledged message 7207-BpAss7-BpSeq13.27-1_perform
Toby

Interestingly, the process is still listed as being active in the BPELConsole:
7207 : Instance #7207 of BPNAME
I can then manually abort the instance, and BPELConsole removes it from the list of active instances, and identifies it with a red cross in the list of historical instances.

Work items creating for GoodsMovement IDOCS

Hi Friends,
We have IDOC to File and File to IDOC scenario, we are able to post GRN files into SAP successfully, but for some idocs , work items are creating for some line items where there is error . After analysis we have come to know that there is some error in article or price is missing.
what i would like to know is instead of creating idoc for some items success and some with work items ,can we restrict if there is error in any line item.
for example:
let us say if i have one GRN file with 10 line items.when i post this File into SAP .. It post 7 items as success and for 3 items it creates workitems.
1) Is there anyway i can restrict the entire idoc , instead of posting 7 items once and after re-processing 3 items in second one.?
2) how to avoid creating work items?
one more thing I have created a backgrounduser for PI while posting to SAP. Some articles are showing as article is locked by piuser.
can anyone suggest how to overcome this..
Regards,
Suman

Suman
What is the Message type / IDOC type your are using? You should be able to create one single IDOC with multiple line items instead of one IDOC for each item, provided the header information for the material document is the same for all the line items. In most cases this is possible.
Check your mapping in XI and see if you can club all the items in one single IDOC. Doing so will also prevent the material locked issue. But, point to note with this design is that you will be penalizing good records in your file just because one line item was in error.
KK

How to hide columns in each page of SSRS report for grouped tablix

Hello all,
I have a requirement like when SSRS report (used row grouping)is exported to EXCEL
1) Each report page should be exported to a separate excel sheet
2) Each sheet will have different columns (that is some columns will hide in sheet2, sheet3...)
3) Eg: If a country report is there with details like country name, country code, currency code. Now each country details should export to separate excel sheet and sheet 1 should show Country Name and Country code; Sheet2 should show: Country Code, Currency
Code; Sheet3 should show: Country Name, Country Code, Currency Code.
I am done with point#1 above: Each report page should be exported to a separate excel sheet. Can some one help on point#2:Each sheet will have different columns (that is some columns will hide in sheet2, sheet3...)
Thanks,
Paandey : Dont forget to mark it as Answered if found useful

Hi paandey,
According to your description, there are three columns named country name, country code, currency code in the report. When export the report to excel, you want to show Country Name and Country code in sheet1, Country Code and Currency Code in sheet2, and
show all of the three columns in sheet3.
In Reporting Services, we couldn’t achieve your goal by setting visibility of columns in one tablix. As a workaround, we can use three tablix in the report, then add page break to the tablix. For detail information, please refer to the following steps:
1. Since you have created a tablix with three column, copy and paste it to the report twice.
2. Right-click column handle of Currency code in tablix1, click Column Visibility.
3. Check Show or hide based on an expression, click (fx) button, then type the expression:
=(Globals!RenderFormat.Name = “EXCELOPENXML”)
4. Right-click column handle of Country name in tablix2, set its visibility like step3 above.
5. Select and right-click tablix2, click Tablix Properties.
6. In General pane, in Page Break Options section, check Add a page break before check box.
7. Click Visibility in left pane, check Show or hide based on an expression, click (fx) button, then type the expression:
=(Globals!RenderFormat.Name <> “EXCELOPENXML”)
8. Select and right-click tablix3, add page break to it like step6 above.
9. Set its visibility like step7 above.
The following screenshot is for your reference:
For more information, please refer to the following document:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/robertbruckner/archive/2010/05/16/report-design-naming-excel-worksheets.aspx
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Wendy Fu

Delete credit memo work item created in VA01 when the user change value

Hi,
In T.code VA01 Credit memo request is creating, this document will automatically create work item. Based on Net value in credit memo request, the work item should go for 5 levels of approval. After 1st person is approved, the workflow initiator realized that the net value in created Credit Memo request is wrong; he is going to VA02 and correcting the net value. Again we have to create new work item for this and delete the already created work item. Client has clearly mentioned when ever there is change in 5 critical fields in VA02 then only create fresh work item otherwise no need to create SECOND TIME work item. Net value is one of the critical field in the list.
How to track already created credit memo request and how to delete the previously created work item. What is the feasibility of this requirement and how to handle this situation?
Regards
Vijay

Hi,
Just put a Fork and put 1 out of 2 outcomes and in the first alternative, you put your witem that goes to user B. In the 2nd alternative, put a Wait for event "CHANGED". And after this, put a process control step with "Set workitems to Obsolete" or "Cancel workflow" etc., depending on your requirement.
Pl note that this will only take out old witems, but you need to send a new witem for which you need to trigger another instance of the workflow as well. pl put CHANGED event also as one of the triggering events and use condition editor to restrict the fields that triggers the workflow.
Also, look into the IMG config of the following path. This might be a fitting solution.
In SPRO, go to Financial Accounting (New)---> Financial Accounting Global settings(New) -
>Tools --->Workflow ---> Workflow for Document Parking -->Reset Release Approvals(Customers).
Here, you can list down the fields, the workflow should restart. But, then you need to give the workflow details etc., in the relevant config settings.
We have used this in restarting workflows for General Ledger(GL) documents' workflow when some important fields are changed.
For this config settings, look into the following help link.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/01/a9cdd8455711d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Hope this helps.
venu

Report for Un-Reconcile items

Hi All,
Hope you all must be doing great,I have one problem related with FI.
we are implementing Manual bank Reconciliation statement at our client place. I am facing a practical problem here. The problem is ;
There are some line items those are present in Bank statement( bank charges, LC payment) but the same financial entry is not there in the SAP system(sap ledger). The user feeds all the data that is in the bank statement and run the BRS. The system is taking the matched data and for un-matched data system is throwing Errors while running the BRS . All thematched & Un matched data stored in a Table FEBEP.
The system is not maintaining any status for those line items which are present in the bank statement but not present in the SAP
I have to develop a report in co-ordination with ABAP for those line items which are present in bank statement but not present in the SAP i.e. for Un-Reconcile items
Kindly look into this case please let me know How this situation is to be handeled?
If possible please let me know the Table & fields involved.
With Regards
Manoj Singh

Hello,
It all depends on how you have configured. If you want to clear the items, the system looks for the algorithm you have given. If you want to make postings then the system itself will pass the entries for the unmatched entries. (Bank Charges, LC Payments). You need not bothered about this. The system credits your main account and debits the sub account. Manually you can pass the contra entry if you do not configure for example credit bank sub account and debit bank charges account (in case if you do not configure).
Please let me know if you need any further help.
Regards,
Ravi
==============================================================
The following notes may useful to you. Please search some of my notes on Bank Statements in other threads.
There are different programs to upload electronic bank statement.
FF.5 or FF_5.
I think your case Multicash format you are using.
You need have three files in FF.5 and two files in FF_5
You can prepare a Z program in order to truncate the electronic bank statement into two or three part files and save them on the application server.
1. Take all the external codes list from bank.
2. Take any available documentation from the Bank describing the relevance of the external codes.
3. Make sure that your Chart of Accounts (Bank Accounts) last digits logic is appropriate to meet the requirements.
4. Based on this decide the Account Symbols that are required to be created.
5. Make sure that the masking rules are configured properly.
6. Decide the posting rules that needs to be created.
7. Link up your external symbols provided by the bank with Posting rules and give proper algorithms for posting and clearing logic.
6. Concentrate on the posting areas to be posted while uploading the bank statement.
Further explanation would help you to understand the functionality when uploaded the electronic bank statement.
Main purpose of uploading the bank statement into SAP is to make your Bank Main Account and physical bank statement balance in sync.
You do not have any traditional Bank Reconciliation Statement (BRS) report in SAP.
SAP is normally you maintain bank main account and bank sub account. Whenever you make a payment through F-53 or F-58 or F110, the entry would be:
Vendor Account Dr
To Bank Sub Account
The ending digits of the sub-account would be important in configuring the masking rule. Based on this masking rule when you upload the bank statement the entry the system would pass is:
Bank Sub Account Dr
To Bank Main Account
It depends on the configuration, either the sub account will be cleared by the system automatically or you need to run F.13 to clear the sub accounts.
At the time of receipts, you have different accounting entries unlike payments. It needs to post to two posting areas. 1. GL Accounting 2. Sub-Ledger Accounting
The entries would system itself pass is:
Bank Main Account Dr
To Bank Sub Account
Bank Sub Account Dr
To Cutomer account.
Clearing logic mentioned for your posting rules and the alogrithm used for your external bank symbols will also play pivotal role in clearing the accounts.
Ideally you will use
FF67 / FF.5 / FF_5 for uploading manual or electronic bank statement
FEBA / FEBA_BANK_STATEMENT is used for furthe rprocessing.
GO THROUGH SAP NOTE 48854
Please go through SAP Note. 48854. You will get an idea regarding the functionality of the algorithms.
Though this note is in relevant to GB specific, you will find this very useful.
description follows below regarding the normal procedure for maintaining table T028G. Due to the different bank codes and posting rules, pre-Customizing is not possible at this point.
The following processing types are available - unless stated otherwise, you should use the interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation' in each case.
1. '00': There is no processing. The entry line is ignored.
2. '01': A validation is made whether an entry exists for the transferred check number in the check table (PAYR). The check number and payment document number are transferred for further processing. Interpretation algorithm: outgoing check processing '011'-'013'; the update in the check file is via the interpretation algorithm.
3. '02': Transfer of the ending balance to the electronic bank statement
4. '03': Transfer of the opening balance to the electronic bank statement
5. '04': Clearing via the allocation number which is delivered with the bank statement. No interpretation algorithm.
6. '05': Clearing of BACS payments or BACS bank collection. The reference text field is first read to ascertain whether it involves payments initiated by users or bank collection via BACS. Providing it does involve a cash transaction initiated by the user, the payment document numbers concerned are determined via the reference number and transferred as a reference to further processing. Interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation' or '019 - Reference number DME'.
Note
To differentiate between the two procedures in table T028G, you have to maintain two separate entries.
Example: the bank uses bank code '62' for cash receipts and for BACS bank collection.
Ext. Transaction +/- sign Posting rule Int. Algorithm Processing type 62 + GB62 001 5
62 SAPBACS + GB63 000 5
7. '06': Bank costs or interest revenues
Recommended interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation'
8. '07': Total amount of cash disbursements
9. '08': Total amount of cash receipts
10. '09': Items not paid
Recommended interpretation algorithm: '000 - No interpretation'
Regards,
Ravi

SSRS Report for Incidents/Work Items Created or Closed over time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for