Steps in INTRASTAT Reporting

Dear Experts,
Can you please let me know the detailed steps to file Intrastat Reporting in Simple terms. I have gone thru the help available in SAP portal, I am looking at steps business to following to file the INTRASTAT in Manual way (not by Soft Copy / print out in SAP).   We have the following Scenarios
1 Purchases for Direct / Indirect
2 Vendor Returns
3 Sub Contracting
Now after various business transactions, if I  need to submit INTRASTAT to authorities then how to proceed
a) Run Report MEIS / VE01, and inturn it updates table VEIAV. Then how to proceed further?
b) What are are the Transactions need to be executed for updation of table VEIAV
c) What kind of cares to be taken in General
Thank you in advance
Chiru

Does this help?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/fr/fd/45c2649d6411d189b60000e829fbbd/content.htm

Similar Messages

  • INTRASTAT reporting rules for France french (receipt)

    Hello experts,
    I would like to know the rules for selection and inclusion of the data for the INTRASTAT report for import.
    My country is FRANCE. I know that the logic depends on the country.
    I've not found a thread explaining France.
    My SAP is 4.7.
    Thanks a lot for any response

    Hi,
    I suggest you the Note 1016386 - Intrastat for Romania. Althought it is for Romania, this note contains a document that explain the setttings in IMG, functional steps, etc...
    In notes, if you search notes with the string 'INTRASTAT FRANCE' you have around 25 notes by legal changes. The differences in countries are formats of files, paper declarations, etc..
    Each country call a report to do the 'document' (file or paper) In your case: RVEXDAIF and RVEXPAIF. Run it in SE38 and read the info.
    If you need something else, let me know it.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Intrastat reporting for STO

    Hi All,
    We have a plant abroad located in Hungary to which we despatch goods through STO from UK. Please let me know if we are supposed to report this transaction in the intrastat arrival for Hungary and despatch for UK. If yes, please let me know exactly at what point the same will reflect in the intrastat reporting. Will it get reflected immediately on STO posting and running the update through MEIS/VE01?
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi,
    I suggest you the Note 1016386 - Intrastat for Romania. Althought it is for Romania, this note contains a document that explain the setttings in IMG, functional steps, etc...
    In notes, if you search notes with the string 'INTRASTAT FRANCE' you have around 25 notes by legal changes. The differences in countries are formats of files, paper declarations, etc..
    Each country call a report to do the 'document' (file or paper) In your case: RVEXDAIF and RVEXPAIF. Run it in SE38 and read the info.
    If you need something else, let me know it.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards,
    Eduardo

  • Intrastat Report Config in ECC 6.0 - goods Movement in EU countries

    Colleagues, need ur help to understand the changes require in ECC 6 standard Report configuration settings.
    Case : In our organisationla structure ,our Plants has storage locations in various EU countries.
    We need to report goods movment from Storage location ( NL) to other Storage Location ( DE) within same Plant ( A, UK )
    What steps/ enhancement/ config require ????
    Currently, standard report is not able to fetch data for goods movments withing same plant but with different storage location countries.
    Your Help is highly appreciated

    Dear All,
    I have an scenario where moving goods from one storage location to another within the same plant is not a problem.
    What I still have not been able to accomplish is the INTRASTAT reporting as both storage locations involved are in different countries, lets say Austria and UK.
    Could you let me know how can I enable this to report EU Movements?
    Regards,
    Garcivi

  • Intrastat Report in ECC 6 for Inter Company Billing

    Hi Experts,
    Need your input.
    In business case, Company code A raise intercompany invoice on Company B for Goods deliverd by Co A directly to End customer of Co B.
    Since there is no actual Physical goods receipt by Company B, the intrastat report is not fetching any data as goods are directly delivered to End Customer by Co A.
    Can Somebody help me ..how can we customise...the Report so that Company B will have Goods Arrival Report data.

    Hi Anil,
    I am sorry , i can't get you. You mean abaper will enter temp data .. in Dev server not in PRD..
    What do u means by that... since we want this report in PRD...so ultimately the same report needs in PRD also...and u mean that abaper will create temp data in Dev server only...
    can u please be more elaborative...in steps..

  • Re: Intrastat Report - Excluding Non Stock Items

    Hi,
    Currently I am in the process of compiling an intrastat report for our last three periods, as prior to this process, the report was being configured manually.
    However, I need to know how to exclude a Non Stock Item - i.e. Transport Charges which our company has present in the Items List, but does not use to issues or receive goods.
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Kind Regards

    the wizzard is nothing else than the combination of the customizing steps for Intrastat. The only thing you can do in the wizzard is to define the inclusion/exclusion indicators.
    These are the indicators that you need to enter manually in ME21N to the item.
    It does not matter if you start Intrastat slection from the ENGR cockpit transaction or directly with MEIS transaction, the same selection screen appears, and it does not allows you to exclude only certain items of a PO. you can only exclude the whole PO in the selection variant.
    Please check again the 2 options I gave you earlier.

  • Intrastat Report for UK

    Hello All
    I am trying to figure out the output format of intrastat report for UK. We have basic setting in place. However I wanted to know how the output format is configured. We are interested in creating a file rfom sap and uplaod it ion HMRC server.
    Can any body please help?
    Thanks
    Sanjeev

    The SAP declaration looks like it conforms to the old EDIFACT data standard u2013 its an international standard and it is accepted by HMRC.
    However to get the right output format you need to select the u201Cautomatically named fileu201D option on the final step of the declaration wizard and not the .csv format one ( the csv is for you to read or store or to check that it looks right - the EDIFACT docs are pretty unreadable to the human eye. CSV can also be used as the basis for input into third party submissions software such as Intrastat Data Entry Package (IDEP) but not for direct submission to HMRC. See the online help "CSV File and Intrastat-Relevant Fields" for more details.)
    The details from HRMC on how to submit EDIFACT format declarations by email can be found at
    http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?itemId=1081740270&r.l1=1079717544&r.l2=1087337125&r.l3=1079840863&r.l4=1081816952&r.l5=1081695786&r.s=sc&type=RESOURCES
    Tristan
    Clarification on .csv use
    Edited by: Tristan Hore on Jun 10, 2011 5:03 PM

  • PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting

    All,
    Due to intrastat reporting restrictions, when we are creating a PO with a free good we need to mark the item as "Free Good" on the item overview, and set the "Business Transaction type" to 41 on the "Origin / Destination / Business" tab of the "Import" tab.
    However, we also need to set the "Statistical value" on the "Decleration Values" tab but this field is greyed out.
    The help message says:
    The system determines statistical values on the basis of condition records with condition types GRWR and GWLB (subcontracting).
    However it does not say where I can set this value. Does anyone know where I can set this value per material?
    Many Thanks,
    Colm

    Can you explain why subcontracting is free of charge, I have never seen somebody doing some work without charging for it.
    are you talking about the delivery of the materials sent to your subcontractor or the finished materials that you get back?
    Usually the statistical value field can be maintained in VEFU. But I guess it interacts with the free of charge indicator in your case.
    I just like to give you some explanation from the statistical office:
    u201CProcessing under contractu201D covers operations (treatment/processing, mounting, assembly, enhancement,
    renovation, etc.) resulting in the production of new or really improved goods on the basis of intermediate
    materials provided free of charge by the commissioning party. Depending on whether processing under
    contract is done within the country or abroad, the relevant terms used are u201Cinwardu201D and u201Coutwardu201D
    processing under contract.
    u201CProcessing under contractu201C in the context of intra-Community trade statistics covers intra-Community
    cross-border movements of goods, provided the finished products produced on the basis of the
    intermediate products provided through cross-border transactions will later leave the country of
    manufacture (dispatch), being either returned to the original country of consignment (arrival; nature of
    transaction u201C41u201C or u201C51u201C) or moved to another country (nature of transaction u201C42u201D or u201C52u201C).
    What must be declared is both the cross-border movement of the (free) intermediate materials and the
    subsequent (cross-border) return of the finished products.
    (Note: Processing performed by the processor on own account is not processing under contract but is
    generally covered as purchase/sale (nature of transaction u201C11u201D.)
    For the declaration of the intermediate products provided free of charge (nature of transaction u201C41u201D), a
    statistical value has to be indicated that corresponds to a selling price customary in the market (free
    German border); in case of doubt a careful estimate should be used. When declaring the finished products
    (nature of transaction u201C51u201D), the invoiced amount to be indicated is the costs of wage, material, transport
    and insurance as invoiced by the contractor; for the statistical value, the statistical value of the
    intermediate materials (provided free of charge) must be included, too.
    (Note: Intermediate products returned to the commissioning party without treatment should be declared
    under nature of transaction u201C51u201D, entering the value originally indicated.)
    If, however, the commissioning party provides only parts that are insignificant in terms of function or value
    (e.g. labels, screws, etc.), then there is no processing under contract. In those cases, such provision of
    materials that is negligible in statistical terms is exempted from declaration for intra-Community trade
    statistics. For the finished product supplied on a cross-border basis, a sale or purchase (nature of
    transaction u201C11u201D) is regularly assumed, with the value of the materials provided free of charge by the
    commissioning party exceptionally not being included when determining the value of the finished
    products.
    Also, there is no processing under contract if the contract work performed at the goods provided consists
    of just simple activities (e.g. simple packaging, ironing, etc.). In such cases the goods exported or
    imported temporarily within that scope are not covered statistically.
    Examples:
    1. A sports car is moved temporarily from Italy to Germany for tuning activities (e.g. power increase,
    car body modifications). What is invoiced in addition to the labour costs is some car parts
    purchased by the domestic contractor.
    As the sports car is u201Creally improvedu201D by the work performed, this is u201Cprocessing under contractu201D,
    which has to be declared under nature of transaction u201C41u201D for arrival and u201C51u201D for (re)dispatch.
    2. For the production of a car in the Czech Republic, the engine gearbox unit and some other parts are
    provided free of charge by the commissioning party located in Germany. For the import of the
    complete car to Germany, the foreign producer invoices the car without the value of the engine
    gearbox unit.
    This is u201Cprocessingu201D of important components (both in terms of value and function) in connection
    with the production of a u201Cnew goodu201D (car), i.e. the transaction u2013 by definition u2013 must be declared as
    u201Cprocessing under contractu201D both for dispatch and for re-arrival.
    3. For the production of an off-road vehicle produced in Austria, the German commissioning party
    provides the company emblem free of charge. When the complete vehicle is imported to Germany,
    the foreign producer of the off-road vehicle invoices the vehicle without the value of the company
    emblem mounted on the vehicle.
    Although the components provided are u201Cprocessedu201D, they are insignificant parts (company
    emblem) both in terms of function and value, so that this is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D but a
    purchase (nature of transaction u201C11u201D) of a vehicle.
    4. An older car is temporarily moved to Poland to restore the paint (washing, polishing and
    conserving).
    This is not u201Cprocessing under contractu201D in the context of intra-Community trade statistics because
    the work performed consists of just simple activities. As this is u201Ctemporary useu201D, the cross-border
    movement of the vehicle is exempted from declaration.

  • Intrastat reporting

    Hi,
    We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
    we have 1 PO for which we did the following
    1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
    2.  reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
    3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
    4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
    Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
    1. There is  entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR  in july.
    2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find  one more entry  as per the invoice posted in Sep.
    Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
    As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
    Kindly correct me if my understanding is worng.
    Thanks & Regards
    R.M.

    Ruchir Mishra wrote:
    Hi,
    >
    > We have a issue in intrastat reporting for GB.
    >
    > we have 1 PO for which we did the following
    > 1. GR in month of July , 101 movement
    > 2.  reversal in month of sep ; 101 Movement
    > 3. GR in month of Sep ; 101 movement
    > 4. Invoice posted in month of Sep .
    >
    > Now when we run the intrastat report(VX99) for the PO we see the following .
    >
    > 1. There is  entry in period 08/2011 for the value as per the GR  in july.
    >
    > 2. when the report is run for 09/2011 we find  one more entry  as per the invoice posted in Sep.
    >
    > Kindly advice if any one is aware of such a issue .
    > As per my understanding there should have been only the entrry for 09/2011 as per the invoice in sep.
    I have some doubts and comments
    How is  it possible that you reverse a movement of July in September?
    SAP allows only posting in current and previous period. Hence you cannot have reversed the a JULY receipt in September.
    You get an Intrastat entry for August, because you had no invoice in July and no invoice in August, but you have to report a movement latest a month after its occurance. If the invoice is not present then this movement is reported with the PO value.
    You wrote you reversed it in September with 101 (usually you reverse with 102 movement), can this be the root cause to have it twice in the September report?
    Before you execute Intrastat technically in SAP, you should already know about the procedure outlined by your government.
    Usually cancellations/corrections have to be reported manually in a special form.
    see the general guide in
    https://www.uktradeinfo.com/index.cfm?task=noticesixty

  • Intrastat report in drop-ship process

    Hi,
    I have drop-ship scenario where plant country belongs to France ( FR) but actual shipment happens from Taiwan(TW).
    Butin the sale order we use plant as France(FR) and shipping point as Taiwan(TW).Since these are drop ships dispatched from non EU countries i.e in my case Taiwan(TW), the intrastat report ignores it. i.e on the invoice document in the "Trade/Custom" tab both "Country of origin" and "Dispatch country" will show as France and the same is picked in Intrastat reporting.
    But this is wrong since actual shipment has been done from Taiwan country . Therefore how can we change this to Taiwan i.e correct country.  One way is change in the user exit of billing.
    but is there any other way, i mean process wise ?. If we do third order sales process would this resolve problem. if so how can this be achieved.
    What i have noticed is even in third party sales process it has the same problem.
    Thankyou in advance

    Thankyou for your reply.
    even if i use Foreign Trade concept , but my plant in sales order is "France" and shipping point as "Taiwan", then the problem is instrastat will ignore Taiwan as a departure country  , it shows only France as departure country , but it should be Taiwan. Therefore how can we resove this problem.
    I dont want to change dispatch country as "Taiwan" using user-exit  in invoice-> "customs/Trade" tab , because if i change this field then instrastat report will pick-up . But withoug user-exit how can we change via config or process wise.
    Thanks in advance

  • Intrastat report Spain. Credit memos posted not appearing in report

    Hi
    I have a issue where the debit notes raised to vendor are not appearing in Intrastat  declaration.
    How this debit and credit notes must be taken by Intrastat ? This problem is there since the Intrastat  report is being used.
    Is there any specific configuration for this or
    is there any period check because of which the debit notes are not picked?
    The reason is po was created in Feb 2009 and continuous GR and invoice postings happened in subsequent months which are all captured in Intrastat  report. A debit note was raised in Sep 2009 which does not appear in the report.
    Request your expertise and help to resolve this issue.
    Thank you

    credit memos are not supported in SAP as you can read in docu:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo2005ao/helpdata/en/F3/4392579F5DC24E9FBE2FA84E9E7660/frameset.htm
    Please read the local Intrastat guide, in many countries it just says that you have to file a correction per paper form to your statiscal office.
    SAP explains this as well in OSS note 374682:
    If a credit memo refers to a billing document which was already declared to authorities, proceed as follows:Here, you should create a written correction to the statistical office.Specify a data record to which the credit memo refers.
    Check the documents of the statistical offices for information on when you have to declare the credit memo (limits for values and quantities).*********************************************************************

  • Intrastat report generation

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing a problem with VX99 T code .this T code is related "Foreign trade: Cockpit" where we are supposed to generate the INTRASTAT report for the  data arrivals (purchase orders) in FRANCE. as of now in the intrastat reporting the data (purchase orders history ) which is related to 122 (EKBE-VGABE = '1' and EKBE-SHKZG = 'H') movement type is getting deleted by the sap standard functionality. the code is available in the the program (RMIMSELS) at line no 7522. but the requirement is what ever the data which is related to 122 movement type should be included in the INTRASTAT reporting for franse.
    if it is possible please let me know your thoughts.
    Thanks and regards
    Mohan

    It is not possible in standard, check for any notes
    Regards
    Chandrasekhar

  • By default, Teststand will not include the test step result in subsequence, is there any way to include these step result in report?

    By default, Teststand will not include the test step result in subsequence, is there any way to include these step results in report?
    Thanks
    Jacky

    Hi,
    If your subsequence is in a separate sequencefile, then check the properties of the sequencefile to make sure that the record has not been disabled.
    Regards
    Ray Farmer
    Regards
    Ray Farmer

  • San Marino to be included for Italy Intrastat reporting

    Hello All,
    We have to include San Marino in EU Country Members for Italy Intrastat Reporting.
    San Marino should be visible in folder "INtrastat" under folder "EU Countries" after executiing transaction "ENGR".
    TX "ENGR"  > PERIODIC DECLARATION.
    we have already maintained SM (San marino) as a EU country in table T005.
    Regards,
    Ajit

    Ajit
    Did you try setting up SM in T Code VEB2- Special Rule Country / Region
    Generally check your Foreign Trade (FT) settings, especally here:
    SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Periodic Declarations/Control Data
    and
    SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Foreign Trade/Customs/Legal Control/Foreign Trade Data by Country of Destination
    Also there are several OSS notes if you search by keyword 'San Marino'. Check them out.

  • Statistical Value in MEIS for INTRASTAT reporting

    Hello,
    From reveiwing related posts I understand that the statistical value on the INTRASTAT report comes from a system default exchange rate that uses the average exchange rate from the border crossing rate (GRWR condition on the PO) and the exchange rate on the invoice.
    What is the exact calculation that is being used to determine the statistical value on the MEIS report?
    Thanks,

    Thanks very much for the link.
    We do have the GRWR conditions set up, and the statistical value is populating correctly on the PO. 
    The issue I'm having is that I can't properly explain how the reported statistical value (VEIAV- GRENZEWEAK) is calculated.
    For example:
    VEIAV - GRENZWEAK is 5,405.86 SEK
    GRWR on PO   572.03 EUR   5,299.22 SEK    (Ex rate: 9.26389)Goods Receipt  504.79 EUR   4,681.78 SEK    (Ex rate: 9.27470)
    Freight               40.00 EUR       370.99 SEK   (Ex rate: 9.27470)Invoice              503.00 EUR   4,770.43 SEK    (Ex rate: 9.48395)
    Do you know how SAP arrives at 5,405.86 SEK with these inputs?
    Thanks,

Maybe you are looking for

  • The Sims 2 vs Leopard

    Hello, Can someone please point me regarding patch for Leopard? Sims 2 and EP (Open for Business/Nighlife/Pets/etc) can't be launched on Leopard... Is there any estimate date we can expect patch? Process: The Sims 2 [80008] Path: /The Sims 2.localize

  • Loading LOTS of objects from xml

    hi I'm developing code that parses an XML file with known elements and reads the contents into objects I've been doing this using DOM DocumentBuilderFactory dbf = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(); DocumentBuilder db = dbf.newDocumentBuilder(); In

  • Open a windows internet page on in safari?

    Hello, I am wanting to open up a internet page which seems to be a windows plug in of some sort. The page I am trying to open is below http://www.songpeople.co.uk/unsigned How do I download the correct plugin? Many Thanks

  • Can you manipulate music on a keynote ppt?

    can you manipulate music on a keynote ppt?

  • Comparing dates (Start date should not be later than End date etc ...)

    Hello All,   I have a table (5 rows) with 7 columns. Of which the first to columns are the start date and the end date. Can someone kindly advise on how I can go about to ensure that there is some validation mechanism in place such that the start dat