STPO-Cross company code with billing

hi all,
how to do stpo with billing step by step?
regards
sv

Hi,
Pricing configuration for STO: -
In SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Schema Determination > Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders > Here assign Calculation Schema "RM2000" i.e. Stock Transfer Document to Schema Grp Pur. Org, STO Type (For e.g. UB) and Supplying Plant.
Calculation Schema "RM2000" has condition type P101 which will pick up the MAP of supplying plant automatically during creation of STO in ME21N ("Conditions" Tab).
You can create new freight / delivery cost conditions in M/06 for Margin and assign in pricing procedure "RM2000" in M/08 and also assign the Accrual Key to this and do the Account Determination for this Accrual Key in OBYC
At the time of PGI, following accounting entry will get generated;
Stock A/c - Dr - 110 INR (Receiving Plant)
Stock A/c - Cr - 100 INR (Supplying Plant)
Margin Account - Cr - 10 INR (Supplying Plant)

Similar Messages

STO processing within Same Company Code with Billing/Invoice

Hello Guru's, I have been asked by our finance department to look at having billing/prices associated with our STO (UB) movements of stock within the same company code. We currently use a UB order type but obviously no billing is associated with the delivery type NL. We do have inter company STO's (order type NB) and have prices and billing associated with the delivery type NLCC.
I wanted to take a copy of the NB order type (copy to ZB) and attached to relevant elements in the IMG (assign doc type & define delivery types). I have done this in an open DEV client and have got a new PO created (ZB) and created a delivery, picked and confirmed the picking. I have got to a point of PGI and i get the following message ' Purchase order 45########## does not contain items for a stock transfer'
Firstly, do any of you trade via STO within the same company code and associate a billing document? The reason we want to is that our manufacturing plants want to charge a premium to the packing and distribution warehouse for the goods to get profit visibility. At the moment the standard cost of goods manufactured at our manufacturing plants transfers to our distribution plant at the same value.
If any of you have any ideas then please let me know.

Hi,
Pricing configuration for STO: -
In SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Schema Determination > Determine Schema for Stock Transport Orders > Here assign Calculation Schema "RM2000" i.e. Stock Transfer Document to Schema Grp Pur. Org, STO Type (For e.g. UB) and Supplying Plant.
Calculation Schema "RM2000" has condition type P101 which will pick up the MAP of supplying plant automatically during creation of STO in ME21N ("Conditions" Tab).
You can create new freight / delivery cost conditions in M/06 for Margin and assign in pricing procedure "RM2000" in M/08 and also assign the Accrual Key to this and do the Account Determination for this Accrual Key in OBYC
At the time of PGI, following accounting entry will get generated;
Stock A/c - Dr - 110 INR (Receiving Plant)
Stock A/c - Cr - 100 INR (Supplying Plant)
Margin Account - Cr - 10 INR (Supplying Plant)

How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill

Hi All,
Can any one help me, How to configure Funds Transfers, Cross Company Code Vendor Payments, Bill of Exchnage Payments with Automatic Payment Program?
Regards
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
This is what you need to do to configure Cross Company Code Vendor Payments.
Execute transaction code OBYA, when prompted, type in 1st coy code, say A and then 2nd coy code, say B. This would take you to the "Maintain FI Configuration: Automatic Posting - Clearing Accounts" screen.
In the first frame, where you have
Posted in : A
Cleared Against : B
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
In the second Frame
Posted in : B
Cleared Against : A
Under Receivable
Debit Posting Key : 01
Account Debit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account)
Under Payable
Credit Posting Key : 31
Account Credit : Account Number (The account can be a G/L account, a customer account or a vendor account).
So, if you are using the Customer/Vendor approach, company A must be set up as both a Customer(Use Txn Code XD01) and a Vendor(USe Txn Code XK01) in Company B and vice versa.
Once you have completed this set-up, you can then use transaction F.13 and/or F13E to carry out your automatic clearing. Alternatively, whenever Payment Run is executed via transaction code F110, this would automatically clear out the payables and receivables in each company code.
However, if you intend to use the G/L approach, then the account numbers would be Inter-coy G/L account for each coy code as defined in the chart of accounts.
I hope the above helps.
Do not forget to award the points please.
Regards,
Jacob

Cross-company-code billing (Thid party) in FI

Hi,
We have configured SD part for Cross-company-code billing (third party). This process is about delivering products to the customer from one company (company code A) and billing customer from another company (company code B) with intercompany invoice from delivering company to Invoicing company.
Could you help me with FI GL accounting postings that should occur in the process?
We have tested it so far and I think that there are some postings missing. Currently GL potings for this process are:
Delivery from company code A to customer:                 STOCK: Ct, COGS: Dt
Customer invoice from company code B to customer:   Revenue: Ct, Customer: Dt, VAT: Dt
Intercompany postings: in company code A:                 IC Revenue: Ct, Cusomer (comp. code B) Dt
I think there is a document missing in Intercompny on Company code B site. I suppose it should be:
IC expenses Dt, Vendor (comp code A): Ct.
Am I right and if yes - how can I configure this automated postning during IC invoicing on IC vendor site?
Thank you,
Karol
Edited by: Karol on Feb 15, 2010 11:34 PM
Edited by: Karol on Feb 16, 2010 9:42 AM

Dear Neil,
There is a concept in FI to maitain "Automatic Posting Clearing Accounts between Company codes". (Check transaction BUV in TCode OBYA)
After you observe the TCode, you can understand the following draft.
-- One Posting transaction (for example with posting key 86 "GR/IR Debit") is posted against a cost object. Based on the configuration mentioned above, automatically the same transaction will be posted as (96 "GER/IR Credit") in the partner company code against the cost object.
-- The Same GL account acts as Credit GL for one Company code & as a Debit GL for the other, preferably.
Now, if the cost on your WBSE comes in the business process / development cycle test due to these features, & if you want to bill the customer based on these sources, then you need to configure the mentioned scenario with the help of your FI consultant first & can then check RRB process
regards

Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
Message no. F5786
Diagnosis
You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
System Response
You cannot enter this kind of document.
Procedure
Enter the transaction in two documents.
For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
JBC.

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Problem with STO-cross company code

hi,
I am configuring STO process for cross company code( plants in different company code). I have done all the config. When creating the PO i am entering the supplying plant, i am getting the error "Purchasing organisation xxxx is not responsible for Plant YYYY". Could some one pls. suggest what may be the problem?
Thanks & Regards,
Pathanjali Bhat

Hi Pathanjali,
For cross company STO, the prerequiste is.
1.0 You have to create a customer in SUPPLYING PLANT and assign to RECEIVING PLANT.
ex: for plant:3000, sales org:3000,dist. chanl:12, divn:00.
and assign to plant:1000 in spro sto setting.
( **maintain shipping notification**)
2.0 Create a vendor in receiving plant .
3.0 Here doc type:NB.
4.0 Maintain supl. plant rec. plnt. and doc type in spro.
5.0 Maintain del type: NLCC.
6.0 Maintain supplying plant in vendor master in purchasing tab>extras> add.purchasing details--> maintain supplying plant here.
Create a PO .
enter vendor which u have created.
ex u r procuring for plant 3000.
maintain pur org, cocode 3000, here ( I think u might have done a mistake here).
maintain plant 3000 in item details tab.
enter the matl. price and qty and check the status.
If every thing ok save.
Then
go to VL10B, maintain del. date (should be before than ur delivery date in PO)
press F8.
ur po line item comes.
select the line item press back ground button
one more line item wil comes.
select any line item, press log. u wil get new screen.
place a cursor on that and press doc details button,
system shows the delevery note. make a note of no. come to LT03.
maintain required fields, select back ground processing. and select 2 below that field( ie pick and post) and press enter.
system picks and post the doc.
now check in PO history. 641 mvt has taken or not?
if not do once again LT03.
Rewert back if any clarification.
Reward if useful.
regards
Viru

CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

Have you considered using this user-exit?
User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
Thanks,
Ben

Cross-Company Sales and Billing doesn't call BUV transaction settings

Hello Dear Experts.
Please help me with the following issue:
1) The Company consists of Headquater and branches (one legal entity) - several Company codes are set in the system for each unit.
2) The Contract for deliverying goods/implementation services with the Customer is concluded by the Head Office. Let's assume it's Company Code One.
3) The goods is delivered by the plant, which is assigned to one of the branches, that is another Company Code in the system - CC2.
4) Our FI group customised the Transaction BUV - Clearing between company codes by the following IMG path: Financial Accounting (New)-->General Ledger Accounting (New)-->Business Transactions-->Prepare Cross-Company Code Transactions (TCode OBYA).
Note: This customising on clearing accounts work well during material transfer between Company Codes in MM and operations within Asset Management in FI-AA.
5) I've created a sales order in CC1. I've pointed that deliverying plant is from CC2. When the billing is posted the system doesn't take the customising from BUV transaction.
What do you think the problem is about?
The entry posts in FI should go as shown in the figure above.
However right now the entries as follows:
CC1: Debits 1210 (Receivabless); Credits 6010 (Revenues). just within Company Code 1.
VAT is not shown both here and in the Figure.
Thanks in advance, Please help me...
PS: I have customised Intercompany Billing through IV Billing with Internal Customer an so on, but our FI group wants to have another schema with posting as shown in the Figure above within the one step in creating the billing document.

I'm not familiar with Verizon wanting people to change their plans online. We just went in to upgrade a phone and they offered to check and see if we were elligible for a discount.
Yes, you would think she could have easily given me the credit for 6 weeks but after sitting on hold for as long as I have with this situation, when she came back and wasn't interested in checking about it, I didn't have the strength left in chasing down her supervisor to get it. Fact is, I should have never spent that much time trying to get them to correct their error. I'm very disappointed that after talking to as many Verizon employees as I did, no one could tell me what happened and how to fix it. I can not be the only person that had that kind of change with that plan.
No one has contacted me yet. I'd be surprised it they did.
Jennifer

Cross Company Code purchasing

Hi,
Please help me to concept of Cross Company Code purchasing .
I need a Document regarding this or configuration setting , its requirement from one of our client.
So pls send me some document about the Cross Company Code Transaction.
Thanks
Mukesh

Hi,
Refer to the link given below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/4b9036dfe4b703e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Even when the plants involved in a stock transfer belong to different company codes, you can use conventional methods to transfer the stock:
By transferring the stock between plants in one or two steps
By carrying out a stock transport order without the delivery function via Shipping
By carrying out a stock transport order with the delivery function via Shipping
In these cases, the value of the transfer posting is posted to a company code clearing account in both the issuing and the receiving plants. The stock transfer is posted at the valuation price of the material in the issuing plant.
Stock Transport Order with Delivery Via Shipping and Billing Document/Invoice
You can carry out stock transfers with the delivery and billing function. In this procedure, the stock is transferred in the form of a sale between two plants.
Stock transfers that include deliveries and billing documents/invoices are only possible between plants belonging to different company codes.
If you want to carry out a cross-company-code stock transport order with delivery but without a billing document, you must set the Relevant for Billing (data element FKREL) indicator in Customizing of the item type to "blank" (Not relevant for billing).
When you use the delivery function in Shipping, the whole transaction - from the delivery through billing and invoice verification - is reflected in the system. The following Shipping functions are available for this:
Delivery:
For example, planning shipping activities, picking, packing
Billing:
For example, price determination
Before you can use a stock transport order with the delivery function and a billing document, the plant must be assigned to a vendor. You maintain the vendor - plant assignment in the vendor master record.
If a user enters a vendor when creating a stock transport order, the plant is automatically copied from the vendor master record.
A stock transport order with delivery and billing is a mixture of a standard purchase order and a stock transport order: as in the standard purchase order, when items are entered (standard items with no item category) price determination is carried out and shipping data established; as in the stock transport order, the transfer of stocks from one location to another is monitored.
Stock Transport Order with Valuated and Non-Valuated Sales Order Stock
When entering goods issues for cross-company-code stock transport orders, you can work with both valuated and non-valuated sales order stock (E) using the one-step procedure (movement type 645) and the two-step procedure (movement type 643). In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4) you define from which stock material is to be withdrawn by selecting the Dependent requirements indicator for individual and collective requirements. There are three options:
Indicator set to Blank (individual and collective requirements): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 1 (individual requirements only): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 2 (collective requirements only): material is removed from unrestricted-use standard stock
Prices
In Purchasing, the price of the material in question is determined in the usual manner (from the info record, for example).
In SD, pricing is also carried out as normal during the billing process.
Your company has to maintain settings in the Customizing system determining whether stock transfers between two plants should be with or without billing.
You can also determine whether individual users can carry out stock transfers, for example, with or without billing or in either of the two ways.
If you choose Purchase Order ® Create ® Stock Transfer (i.e. a stock transport order without billing) and stock transfer with billing has been defined for the plants in Customizing, a message appears indicating that you should create a standard purchase order.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.
Edited by: RAVI SHANKAR H.N on Jan 12, 2009 10:45 AM

Stock transport order ("Q" stock, configuration) - cross-company code

We tried to create stock transport order (cross-company code) and consequents documents with
using "Q" stock and material configuration. Unfortunately we have got
1) message M7 146 concerning the special Q stock not supported by the
movement 643., 2) configuration is not taken into delivery type NLCC. Can anyone help?

Hi,
Please follow the below process for stock transport order...
1. Create stock transprot purchage order (ME21N)
2. Create delivery Vl10b or VL01n and then goods issue
3. Inter comapny billing with billing type IV...
Please go to VOV7 there speical stock filed as blank and billing relevance as A...
Regards
sankar

Cross company sale and billing process

Hello Everyone,
Could you please help me to configure Cross company sale and billing process step wise..my senario is:-
End Customer(J090) order goods (R-797) to company code and sales org (U100/U151). The stock is not available in plant U111. The inter company plant CQ11 agrees to supply the material (R-797) to the end customer directly. Now i need to create two invoices 1. End customer invoice and 2. Inter company invoice to the ordering plant AN36.
Comp code : U100
Plant : U111
Sales area : U151,DL,00
Material : R-797
End Customer :J090with sales area U151,DL,00 and company
code U100.
Delevering company
Comp code : CQ00
Plant : CQ11
Sales area : CQ11,DL,00
Please help me in this regard.
I shall be liable to u.
Thank u
Rikin

Hi
1. Assign the Delivering Plant CQ11 to the distribution chain U151+DL (Ordering sales org + dist.channel).
2, Assign Inter-company Billing type IV to your Order Type (e,g, OR).
3. Assign the Plant CQ11 to Sales Area U151/DL/00.
4. In XD01, create the Sales organisation U151 as a customer in the Supplying Sales area CQ11/DL/00. Then specify the customer number (e.g, 1111) against the Sales organisation U151.
5. Supplying company code CQ00 should exist as a vendor for the ordering company U151.
6. Now, maintain Pricing Procedure determination for the customer Invoice as below.
Customer Pricing Procedure (of the end customer) + Document Pricing Procedure (of your Order Type) + Ordering Sales Area (U151/DL/00) -
>> RVAA01.
7. Create condition record in VK11 for condition type PR00 on the level Ordering Sales org/End customer/Material (U151/End cust no/R-797).
8. Create condition record for condition type PI01 on the level, Ordering Sales org/Supplying Plant/Material (U151/CQ11/R-797).
Mark the condition type PI01 as statistical in the Pricing Procedure RVAA01. It is cost for the ordering company (U100) but revenue for supplying company (CQ00).
9. Maintain another Pricing Procedure (e.g, ICAA01) for Intercomp[any Billing as below,
Supplying Sales area (CQ11/DL/00) + Customer PP of the Internal customer created (e.g,1111) + Doc PP of the Inter-company Billing (e.g, IV) -
>> ICAA01.
10. In t.code V/06, for the condition type IV01(Inter-company Price), maintain/specify condition type PI01 as the reference condition.
We do not create condition record for Inter-company price condition type IV01. Infact, it takes the value from the ref condition PI01.
When goods are delivered to the customer J090 by supplying company CQ00, the Ordering company U100 will bill the customer J090 where the Pricing Procedure RVAA01 will be used (copied from the Sales order).
Next the Supplying company CQ00 will bill the Ordering company U100 using Intercompany Billing Type IV with reference to the Sales order, where Pricing Procedure ICAA01 will be used.
In the Inter-company Billing condition type PR00 also appears but in inactive mode. Condition type PI01 and IV01 takes the same value.
Hope, this will help.
Regards

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Posting of cross company transaction with different doc types

Hi,
The scenario is:-
We have two companies X and Y.
X makes a payment to Y with the following FI entries:-
Company Code X
Dr Vendor Y
Cr Bank HDFC
Company Code Y
Dr Bank ICICI
Cr Customer X
Now this needs to be a cross company transaction where the doc type for CC X should be vendor Payment 'KZ' while the doc type for CC Y should be a customer reciept with doc type 'DZ'.
Although I am able to map the accounts in cross company code config I am not able to split the transaction of different company codes with different document types.
Is there any way we can do this in standard SAP?
Thanks in advance,
Nitish

Hi
As per your issue ...There are no possibilities to post in sap with different document types.
If you want you can post cross company code transactions with one document types
Regards
vamsi

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Automatically clear the open items for a GL account cross company codes

Hi FICO experts,
Can anyone help me on the following issue urgently?
There are journal entries posted to same GL account with different company code. Is there any way to automatically clear the open items sitting in the GL account in company code A to against the open items for the same GL account in company code B.
The example is below:
Journal in company code A
Dr. 840410      $100
Cr. 111300       $100
Journal in company code B
Dr. 111301   $100
Cr. 840410      $100
Now I want to automatically clear account 840410 by using assignment or text in the journal entry.
It will be highly appreciated for any instructions.
Adele

Hello Adele Wang,
You can enter cross-company code transactions in one step in the General Ledger, Accounts Receivable, and Accounts Payable application components. This function would be used, for example, for centralized procurement or payment.
Integration:For centralized payments, each individual company code enters its own invoices separately, while a central company code pays them. When you are clearing open items, the system makes clearing entries between the company codes participating in the clearing procedure. These clearing entries represent the receivables and payables that exist between the company codes in centralized payment.
Prerequisites:You have specified which company codes are to be processed via a single company code. In this specification, you can distinguish between clearing transactions. You can therefore have different combinations of company codes for incoming and outgoing payments.
You have specified the clearing accounts that record the receivables and payables between the individual company codes. The system posts to these accounts automatically when clearing the open items.
You need to make the required settings in the activity Prepare Cross-Company Code Manual Payments in Customizing for Financial Accounting (Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable->Business Transactions->Outgoing Payments->Manual Outgoing Payments).
Features:For each company code, the system generates a separate clearing document. A joint transaction number marks these documents as belonging together.
Example:For a clearing transaction (incoming payment, outgoing payment), you have agreed in Customizing that if company code 0001 is specified, open items are also selected from other company codes (0002 and 0003).
Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points.
Rgds
manish
Clearing can then also be carried out if the account to be cleared has not been created in company code 0001. As long as no items have to be posted to this account in company code 0001, it is not necessary to create a master record for the account in company code 0001.
See also:

STPO-Cross company code with billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for