SU split inspection lot

Hi,
I've post GR for Quality Material 10 EA. (Im Master Data in WM2 view I have 10 EA / Palett)
we have 10 EA but 3 EA for inspection lot
After the GR I 've created a TO. In the TO I have 2 positions (the 1st with 3 EA and the 2nd with 7EA) instead 1 Position with 10 EA.
I don't want to split the SU.
Where can I control it so that the system doesn't split the SU after inspection lot.
thanks
Dede

Thanks I've got it.
that is the standard process. The SU has normally to be split.
But in the Customizing WM go to the interface Quality you can control there if the su has to be split or not.

Similar Messages

  • How to split inspection lot in Routing?

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there any chance to create splitting inspection lot in the middle of a routing process ?
    My scenarios are :
    I have a BOM with finished product X and Component A
    I also have Routing AA with 2 operation inside, Operation 1 for Production Process, while Operation 2 for Quality Control ( in 1 Routing )
    The flow production is the BOM Component A will be issued into Operation 1(it will be issued in 1 PC), after that the output from Operation 1 will be Product X in many pieces (for example 10 pcs and also define as 10 batch number)
    Now the problem is, when the 10 pcs product X have to go into the operation 2 is there should be define per inspection lot for every batch number (so in this case it should create 10 inspection lot) for QC Operation
    What i know now is the inspection lot already generated for inprocess inspection (for all operation), but it is just 1 inspection lot for 1 production order
    I need to create inspection lot from receiving product X after operation 1 equal to the amount batch created from finishing operation 1 ( 10 pcs = 10 inspection lots), but still inside the routing process and then process it into operation 2 (QC station), how to do that??
    is there anyone who can help to solve this problem?
    Regards,
    Rizki

    Hello Shantilal,
    once you have created an inspection point you cannot change the data -> This would lead to an inconsistency simular to the following case.
    This can lead to dumps if you change the data of an existant inspection point in customizing. SAP recommends creating a new inspection point definition.
    The reason is the fact that key fields can be maintained via customizing, a change of these key fields means that the system will try to sort inspection points with the old key fields using the newly defined key fields.
    Example: Customizing -> Define Identifier for Inspection Points
    (1) indicates the position in the key
    Inspection point definition for Z01
    Key 1 (Original Key)
    (1) Text length 18, (2) Text length 10, (3) Number length 10, (4) Number length 3
    Is changed to Key 2
    (1) Date, (2) Time, (3) Number length 10, (4) Number length 3
    As you can imagine if the plan tries to select previously created inspection points this will lead to a dump, because the key has been changed.
    In this case you need to create a new inspection point definition Z02 with the new key and create a plan which also uses the new inspection point type.
    Appartently you have done so, but the plan assigned to the inspection lot uses the previous inspection point definition, if you were to change the inspection points this would also lead to a dump.
    I hope that this answer helps you to understand why the requested function is not possible.
    Regards,
    Isabelle

  • Inspection lot per HU instead of batch in inter company stock transfers

    Hello,
    We are testing intercompany stock transfers and we face the following problem when we check inspection lots created at the receiving plant: one inspection lot is created for each HU, while we want one per batch.
    We multiplied tests with many combination on  material settings on inspection type 01 (which is inspection type used on inspection lot):
    u2022     with or w/o u201CInsp. for HUu201D
    u2022     u201CControl inspLotu201D: blank, 1, 2 or X
    without success!
    Letu2019s me precise that inbound delivery is created automatically from goods issue at issuing plant because we activated SPED functionality (then Hus numbers are directly taken from outbound delivery to inbound delivery).
    Also we noticed something that could help understand the problem:
    1.     when issuing plant picks HUs into the warehouse, they confirm TO via RF transaction (LM61). As a result, outbound delivery as a main item and there is a split by several sub items, as many as HUs confirmed
    2.     when we test the picking confirmation out of a non RF transaction (LT12), there is a main item but only sub items per batch (qty is then aggregated)
    What is maybe interesting to notice is in the first case, inspection lot at receiving plant is created per HU while in the second case, it is created per batch!
    Second behavior is what we require but RF pick confirmation is mandatory for us!
    Is there any chance to change QM behavior in that case?
    Thank you,

    Dear Gajesh,
    thanks for your replay. It is very helpful.
    Option A
    1) The finish goods would be are already release and that does not go with our Q-policy.
    2) Does this mean, I have an inspection lot at the point of time of GR from production to warehouse and another inspection lot at the time of delivery. That would mean I double my work?  And the time of delivery happens one day after GR from production but the Q-results still need some more days. I do not see how this should work.
    Option B
    1) What do you mean by multiple GR to the warehouse storage location?
    Where do I have to activate the copying option for the inspection lot?
    Here I see the problem still existing. The result of the MIC has not been found out yet, the UD can not be done and I do multiple goods movement to the warehouse. What is the lelp? If I could make several stock transfer from the q-stock within the inspection lot that would be the best.
    May I am thinking wrongly but the best would be to keep the stock in the q-stock. Does a suitable BAPI exist where I could program a logic to it or what do you think?
    Thanks for your feedback,
    Best regards,
    Heinz

  • Solution of Inspection Lot creation

    Hi expert,
    I am newbie in QM module.  I have some question for solution in QM inspetion.
    sample
    Production Order created order for 100,000 pcs and goods receipt batch split(2,000 per batch), 50 batch per production order.
    Then in QM generate 50 inspection lot (inspection lot per batch). Usually QM inspector inspected some batch not all of 50 batch.
    How i can result record in SAP only 1 inspection lot for all of 50 batch and 49 inspection lot auto result record and auto UD.
    Or
    1 Production Order generate 1 inspection lot.
    thank you

    Hi Sandip,
    Thank you for your reply.
    I try to setting following with you.
    In SPRO
    and
    In Material Master
    and then I created production order for 10,000 pc and goods receipt 5 batch@2,000 pc
    such as
    BATCH001 : 2,000
    BATCH002 : 2,000
    BATCH003 : 2,000
    BATCH004 : 2,000
    BATCH005 : 2,000
    I want system generate 1 inspection lot per material document. but system generate 5 inspection lot
    How i can set for 1 inspection lot
    thank you ^__^

  • Inspection lot summary when GR post to same material and batch

    Dear Experts,
    The business flow is, when material with same batch number come to plant, this batch may split and post to different storage location.
    we have tried setting control inslot parameter to "2 For each material batch and storage location" but it only work within one storage location.
    can any expert suggest idea about this thing, thanks a lot.

    You'll only be able to stop the second lot from being created.  You won't be able to update an open, existing inspection lot because of the different storage location.  SAP can't have two segments of inventory linked to the same insp. Lot.
    Are you using batch status at your plant? As an alternative, you could create the batches with a restricted batch status.  Then the whole batch, regardless of storage location shows as restricted stock.  Use the user exit to prevent creation of additional insp lots.  When the first insp lot is completed, the batch status can be changed via the UD stock posting to unrestricted stock.  When this happens, all stock of the batch in all other storage locations will change to unrestricted stock.
    FF

  • Wrong batch populated on Inspection lot

    Recently we came across the following issue.
    GR have been posted for two by-products(mvt type 531) for a process order within a gap of 6 minutes. Since 05 inspection type was active for both the by-products, two inspection lots were created for two material documents. The batch updated in second inspection lot is same as first inspection lot (Tcode: QA03, Table: QALS). But the batch updated in the corresponding material document is different one (Tcode: MIGO, Table: MSEG). Even the batch in inspection lot is not created in the system (Tcode: MSC3N, Table: MCH1, MCHA).
    Batch level is "Batch unique at material level".
    Have anyone of you came across this issue? Please reply with your thoughts and experience.

    No. We don't have split valuation. I am giving you example of issue . I am trying to search mat A and batch 100 in system but I didn't find in MCH1,MCHB,MCS3N. In short batch not created for particular mat and batch combination . When I searched inspection lot for both mat and batch combination then I found . This inspection lot is created after GRN for by product , movement type 531 , inspection type 05.When I saw batch in material document it is 101 instead of 100 .
    Question
    1. If batch 100 is not created for mat A then why it is showing on inspection lot header ?
    2. If batch in mat document is 101 then actually same batch should show on inspection lot header .How come batch 100 populating on inspection lot header ?
    Thanks ,

  • Sample in Inspection lot

    Hi Experts,
    My client want sample to be calculated on basis of inspection lot.
    For example if inspection lot having 100 and less then 500 quantity then sample should 50 %
    if quantity is 500 and less then 1000 then 10 %.
    We are using MIC .
    How can this be achieved in QM . Please give me detail for creating master data for this.
    Amit

    Hi
    What will i specify if i cannot specify percentage and how ?
    lets say that you split the lot size & specify the Sampling table in sampling scheme as
    Inspection lot                 sample size
    100                                   10
    200                                    50
    300                                   150
    400                                    200
    500                                    250
    600                                    275
    etc
    now in the task list use the sampling procedure aginst char (this sampling procedure must be of sampling type: sampling scheme)
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Source inspection lot

    I made a settings in job planning for source inspection to create inspection lot.
    But when PO is released, it is creating 4 inspection lots for the same PO., please advice what i went wrong.

    How about schedule delivery?
    Delivery split into 4 times?

  • Follow-up action : please help - Inspection Lot related

    Hi,
    I am having the following trouble:
    Through MB02, a printout is generated to the local printer (LOCL).
    However, through QA11, when we save, we have a custom follow-up action attached that pops-up a
    dialog screen.
    The follow up action is triggered when a usage decision is changed for the inspection lot.
    The follow-up action (configured in IMG) calls a Function Module and a screen, which in turn populates
    a value into a custom DB table (based on the buttons, on the screen, sending either to LOCL or to a
    zebra printer).
    Now, what has to happen is that after inserting the value into a custom table, it should also open a sapscript and output.
    The Sapscript and print program are there, with the print program being created 3-4 years ago by someone
    else. However, even though we have code in the print program to update nast, in turn creating a message
    for output (1st the custom DB table is checked to see if the values match, MATNRCHARG), It does not update
    NAST. When we go through MB02, it does, but this should happen automatically after selecting one of the radio
    buttons on the original pop-up & selecting print.
    Please help. I don't know what to do and can't enable a debugger from the pop-up and if going though QA11,
    I can't get it to stop inside the print program (only inside the custom FM).
    Cheers,
    John

    hi
    kindly check whether this FM will work for you QFOA_OBJECT_STATUS_SET
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Creation of inspection lot 04 depending on production version

    Hi Experts,
    could you tell me if it is possible to create a Good Receipt inspection (lot origin 04) depending on the production version used ?
    My material has 2 production versions:
    0001 - production with process order
    0002 - production with repetitve manufacturing
    When I do a GR on process order, I do not want to create an inspection lot 04.
    When I do a GR on product cost collector, I want to create an inspection lot 04.
    As I have entered inspection types in material master data, I do not know how to do the distinction ?
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Best regards
    Amaury

    Hi
    Check user exit
    QBCK0003 |Extended QM check for goods receipt
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Inspection lot  is not getting updated in quant

    Hi Experts,
    Need your help..
    I have posted two material doc with same material following is the consequences :
    1.we have immediate TO creation process , so now we have 2 TO's and 2 inspection lots.
    2.When i am doing UD for first inspection lot PCN does get created.
    3.Now i do TO confirmation for putaway for TR and then TO creation and confirmation for PCN and material is in bin.
    4.When i am confirming the TO(TR i.e putaway TO) ,Inspection lot  is not getting updated in the quant due to which i am not able to convert PCN to TO
    Because in quant i found previous inspection lot which is different from having in PCN document.
    So is there any solution which will update the inspection lot in quant once we confirm TO(putaway TO) ?
    Any help on this will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    OM

    Hi jugen,
    Thanks for you help but now i going for below development :
    Once UD is done system will take the inspection lot from from the quant and will overwrite to the
       newly created PCN
    So that during PCN to TO creation (LU04) inspection lot will remain same both in quant and PCN .
    Do you have any idea on this i mean where in QA32 tcode i have to write this logic ?
    Thank you..
    Regards,

  • Inspection Characteristic is not being displayed in the inspection lot

    I have created a Calibration order by first creating method, then a MIC, same is attached to a task list and then a Plan.
    But when i trigger a order for that task list the inspection characteristics as mentioned in the task list does not appear in the order.
    Please let me know how to get the inspection characteristics in the order.
    I have checked the task list, in that the Inspection characteristics is visible.
    Please help
    Praneet

    I have noted one thing, in inspection lot the sample size is shown as zero for the equipment where the inspection characteristic is not being displayed and it is shown as one for the lot where the inspection characteristic is displayed.
    Both the Inspection lot the task list is same
    Please reply

  • Vendor code in Stock Transfer Inspection Lot(08)

    Hi Everybody,
    I have noticed that when a Stock Transfer lot is created, the 'Data for lot orogin' tab in the Inspection Lot shows Vendor code in 'Data for goods receipt' section at times and at times Vendor code is not included in this section.
    Please throw some light on the situations under which the vendor code is included and excluded.
    Regards,
    Manish.

    I can't say for sure but I would compare the triggering document.  I.e. Exactly what material movement is used in each case and what type of document triggered it, (I.e. an STO order).  Than look at those documents and see if and why a vendor number is available.
    FF

  • No inspection lot can be opened for this material and vendor -QA228

    Hi every one !
    Iam  getting  Error while doing Migo -"No inspection lot can be opened for this material and vendor-QA228"
    we analyze the issue asfollow -
    1.checked Quality Lot-Available
    2.Quality info record- Availble
    3. Quality plan is exist.
    But stil throwing  above Error.

    Hi,
    Check the below threads,
    [No inspection lot can be opened for this material and vendor;
    [No inspection lot can be opened for this material and vendor;

  • Report for inspection lots

    Hi All,
    Report for the inspection lots that clear UD but still in inspection stock( no posting is done).?
    Thnaks
    vbraj

    Dear Raj,
    Please try report QVM2.
    Best Regards,
    Anand Rao

Maybe you are looking for