Sub-sequent debit in scheduling agreement

Hi All,
My client is having requirement like this:
Client receive the material against scheduling agreement and do the invoice verification,After verification & payment vendor will send the supplementry lnvoice for additional amount.
In case of purchase order, I am able to do the same scenario by change the price in purchase order & make the subsequent debit in MIRO.
But in case of scheduling agreement,I change the price in scheduling agreement,still I am not able to post the subsequent debit.
System will show the message :
Price too high (tolerance limit of 5.00 % exceeded)
This message is required,cause client wants that if any additional bill comes then first make the change in price of PO & scheduling agreement.
Kindly provide your valuable suggesions.
Regards,
Dinesh

Raise upper limit for tolerance key PP,Company Code in OMR6.

Similar Messages

Inbound delivery for Sub-Contracting Scheduling Agreement

Hi All,
I am working on inbound delivery creation --> PGR for sub-assembly (Semi-finished product) which we receive from sub-contracting vendor through scheduling agreement. At time of PGR, it should do MVT#101 for sub-assembly and 543-O for raw components.
I already created JIT/FRC releases and did PGI (MVT # 541-O) for raw components. Now I am manually creating inbound delivery (VL31n) to post PGR. When I am doing PGR with VL60, I am getting below error.
Any help or suggestion please ?
As observation, I have seen that in inbound delivery I am only seeing sub-assembly (semi-finished) product. I am not able see "SC Component" tab which I have seen on other environment (ECC 6.0 with EHP4). Is it related to system limitation where we can't do PGR for sub-contracting ?
Thanks.

Hi AKPT,
Sorry if i miss understood but note 352243 says to refer note: 338119
"In the current release, it is not possible to process the components to be cleared when you post the goods receipt for the inbound delivery. (See Notes 338119, 197864 and 199703 also).
However when you implement these corrections, the error log is also displayed for the subitems to be cleared and further processing can be carried as described in Note 338119."
When I refer note : 338119, there is no correction. Am I missing anything ?
Again my issue is I am not able to perform Post Goods Receipt. Even after doing PGR, if system do 543 for raw component, I am fine.
Thanks.
Regards,
Ravi

Sub sequent credit

can any body tell me wat is the diff between sub sequent credit and sub sequent debit tell me with a example
regards
kiran

Hi
Find info given by SAP
A subsequent debit/credit arises if a transaction has already been settled, and a further invoice or credit memo is received afterwards.
A subsequent debit/credit changes the total invoice value of a purchase order item; the total invoice quantity remains unchanged. Therefore, only a value-based update of the purchasing transaction takes place. There is no quantity-based update.
You must enter an invoice as a subsequent debit if a purchase order item has already been invoiced and further costs are incurred. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too low a price and then sends a second invoice for the difference.)
You must enter a credit memo as a subsequent credit if a purchase order item was invoiced at too high a price and now you have received a credit memo. (Example: A vendor has inadvertently invoiced you at too high a price and then sends a credit memo for the difference.)
If you enter a subsequent debit/credit, the system suggests the entire invoiced quantity, but no value. The maximum quantity that you can subsequently debit or credit is the quantity that has already been invoiced.
You can only enter a subsequent debit/credit for a purchase order item if an invoice has already been posted for that item.
A subsequent debit/credit cannot refer to a particular invoice.
eg.Subsequent debit
Typical example is like
suppose vendor has overcharged u for perticular PO and afterward he want to correct it
In such scenario u can post subsequent debit to correct PO without affecting Qty. field
and if vendor has charged less he cangive subsequent credit note to us
Vishal....
Reward if usefull

What is setps to crete the Sub contracting with Scheduling agreement .

Hi All,
what is setps to crete the Sub contracting with Scheduling agreement and up to migo
Thanks
HAPPY

hi
firstly set the SPRO> MM>Purchasing>set up Subcontractor order>assigning plants to the delivery documet LB
check following in system
1. Shipping point created properly
2. Shipping point has been assigned to the appropriate plant.
3. Maintain shipping conditions in customer master
4. Maintain loading group in material master
5. Assignment of customer to vendor master
then try following process
1. Create a subcontracting Purchase Order (ME21N)
u2022Click on u201CMaterial Datau201D tab under u201CItem detailsu201D and then click on u201CComponentsu201D to view the components / make changes.
u2022Account Assignment and Item Category are usually blank in a subcontracting PO.
2. Delivery of components to subcontracting vendor (ME2O)
u2022Enter selection parameters like vendor and plant and click on Execute.
u2022Select the desired line, click on Create Delivery and a delivery will be created.
3. Post Goods Issue (VL02N)
u2022The movement type is usually 541.
4. Post Goods Receipt (MIGO)
5. Logistics Invoice Verification (MIRO)
*check out the doc i given in previous reply it is for SUBCONTRACT with SA *
regards
kunal

BOM not copied to sch. line in Sub Contract scheduling agreement in Kanban.

Hi,
We are trying to procure material (A) via subcontract scheduling agreement document using Kanban process. This subcontract material has a valid BOM (say it has child materials B & C). We are working with 'Replenishment element for kanban' model (not JIT call).
When Kanban bins status is changed to empty, a schedule line is placed in the subcontract scheduling agreement. But when we try to view the BOM of the schedule line created (Item -> components -> overview), we dont find any child material (B&C) attached to it. Hence when Kanban bin was changed from RED to GREEN, material movement 101 takes place for parent material (A) but 543 (consumption of child materials) is not happening for child materials (B &C).
Mean while, we created some schedule lines manually in aforementioned SC sch.agreement. When we view the BOM of this manually created schedule line, we can see the child materials attached to it. Hence when bin status was changed from RED to GREEN, both 101 & 543 movements were posted.
Can anyone let us know what needs to be done so that when Kanban bin is changed to EMPTY, it places schedule line in SC sch.agreement along with its BOM (Child material) details?
Warm regards,
Saravana.

Dear Ashok,
Issue: how to make BOM field(Component Part) in PO/ SA field non editable in MM customising. After the PO is saved user can not able to edit the component field in PO or Scheduling Agrreement.
BOM field ( component Part ) is directly dependent on quantiyu of material entered. so once you change the PO quantity the component quanity wil change accordingle,
presently you can not achievev thease
but You can set the release strategy like that Po that it is not changable, doing so u r requirement willl achieve
Hope your query is resolved

Subcontract and scheduling agreement

gurus can u tell n detail reg the subcontract n scheduling agreement followed during real time?

Hi,
Sub Contracting Cycle are:
(1) You have a material (Finished Goods) that can be procured externally, and you have maintained BOM (CS01) with components (Raw Materials). Any waste generated and received during subcontracting process can be maintained as component with negative quantity in the BOM.
(2) You create a subcontracting PO (ME21N, Item Category L with different document type ie.. from std one). Maintain Purchase Info Record for Subcontract category for material and subcontractor.
(3) You make a transfer posting to issue components for SC PO(In ME2O directly or by MB1B with 541 Movement type). Material is sent to subcontractor. As material remains under your ownership, system does not make any value entry. But quantity is shown as "Material Provided to Vendor" .So no accounting document generated by supplying raw material to Sub Contracting Vendor.
(4) You receive (MIGO) finished material against SC-PO. You also specify components consumed in manufacturing of finished goods. Additionally, if you have negative components in BOM, now you'll also receive subcontracting by-products. There are three events, so three accounting entries are generated:
(5) Invoice Verification (MIRO) for SC Invoice.
(6) Payment in F-53
The accounting entries are:
FG BSX acc. Debit Acc.
GR/IR Cle.acc. WRX acc. Credit Acc.
FRL Acc. Debit Acc.
BSV acc. Credit Acc.
BSX acc. of components Credit Acc.
GBB - VBO Acc. Debit acc.
PRD acc. Some time Credit &
Some time Debit
If you are activate Price Diff. Acc. for SC-Vendor in....
OLMB -
> GR -
> Price diff. acc.for SC order while you do GR for your Plant......then Price Diff. Acc. also will be trigered...
Scheduling agreement is a long term purchase agreement, where you will keep issuing the delivery schedules whenever there is a change in requirement or at predetermined time intervals. The delivery schedule can be on hour/daily/weekly/monthly basis. SA is also an agreement with the vendor for the supply of matl, may be a quanity or value. The delivery dates will be maintained in ME38 ref the SA which are called delivery schedules.So you can maintain the delivery schedule and communicate the vendor on Forecase basis or JIT basis. And when you need some more matl then will only create SA deliveries using ME38. SA could be of 2 types:- without release documentation-system will transmit the delivery info to the vendor once you save the document.
With release documentation- after creating the delivery schedules you need to create SA release using ME84.So Process are ME01, ME11, ME31K with aggnrement type, ME38 & MIGO,
For more follow the link;
http://esoadocu.sap.com/socoview(bD1lbiZjPTgwMCZkPW1pbg==)/render.asp?packageid=DBBB6D8AA3B382F191E0000F20F64781&id=EB65A89F1AFD4C46AB61C6161BAF
Regards,
Biju K
Edited by: Bijay Kumar Barik on Apr 23, 2008 7:00 AM

Planned delivery cost & sub-sequent settlements

hi ,
what is meant by planned delivery cost ?
what is meant by sub-sequent settlements ?
when they are useful in MM
regards

Hi
Planned delivery costs are the costs agreed with the vendor or goods supplier before the purchase order is created. You enter these as conditions in the purchase order.
Planned delivery costs can be differentiated as follows:
Origin of Costs
Freight charges
Customs charges
Calculation of Costs
Fixed amount, irrespective of delivered quantity
Quantity-dependent amount
Subsequent adjustment
In sub contracting scenario After the subcontractor had delivered the ordered material , you post the goods receipt to the subcontract PO. The system determines the necessary components for each purchase order item and creates for each component a goods issue item with the quantity that was determined in the purchase order
If the vendor informs you after these postings that a greater or smaller quantity of the subcontracting components was actually consumed than planned in the purchase order, you must post a subsequent adjustment to correct the component consumption.
If the component is a by-product, you must post the corrected by-product receipt (excess receipt) or by-product issue (short receipt)
Similary there is a subsequent credit / debit carried out when an additional invoice or credit memo is received for a transaction that has already been invoiced in LIV process
Thanks & regards
Kishore

Subcontracting in scheduling agreement

Dear all,
while doing subcontracting scheduling agreement, how can we add the child components to the parent material.
in cs01 ,we maintained the bill of material for the parent material.in CS11 we are able to view it.
Regards,
velu

Hi,
If you have already maintained the BOM in CS01, you need not have to maintain the seperate BOM in Scheduling Agreement, because, the already existing BOM will get copied. The only thing you will have to do is that, define special procurement category as 30 (Sub-Contracting) in MRP2 view of the material master & then create the SchedulingAgreement with item category as L (Sub-Contracting).
Hope this clears.
Regards,
Prashant
- Pl. reward points if the answer is helpful to you

Scheduling Agreement to Delivery

Dear All,
I am using scheduling agreement and explode the BOM in it, with LUMF (TAP) TAN and TAN.
In scheduling agreement I assign schedule line for all the items including 1 main, 2 and 3 for sub item.
When i create delivery same will be copy accordingly to the delivery document and priceing will calculate fine...
But when i create deivery after saving first delivery document, let say create delivery for 17.03.2010 and than create for 18.03.2010 system only call the sub items on the delivery document ????
give me your value added feedback at your earliest.
Regards

repost the question in detail again.
Thanks

Scheduling Agreement LU: Can Route be changed in the SA item?

Hi all,
I noticed that in the Transport Scheduling Agreement SA type "LU" but in general I think in any SA there is no any chance to change the route determined by the system in the shipping data within the item of SA.
If you select Menu Item > More Functions > Shipping Data you can go an see the detail.
Is it something I can set in customizing or the field EKPV-ROUTE is unchangeable?
The route has to be changed in order to set the ones used for transfer stock between the two plants.
Thank you in advance
Andrea

I have found a reasonable solution to my issue that perhaps it could be helpful for others who have the same problem.
Stock transfer sheduling agreement is between two plants which are assigned to the same company code.
Each plant is assigned to an additional customer code with its own specific ship-to-party. Both customer codes have to be linked to the same payer in case there is an additional plant who belongs to another company code by which you debit stock transfer.
The two customers which represent the addresses of the two plants have a specific transportation zone. There is then a node in customizing dedicated to the route determination in which you have to set the combination for the departure country/zone and destination country/zone with the proposed route.
By this settings when you create a scheduling agreement between the two plants: "LU" type, the system values the correct route in each item of the SA according to your customizing.
Kind regards
Andrea
Edited by: Andrea Brunori on Oct 21, 2010 2:45 PM

Scheduling agreement in subcontracting.

Hi,
what are the advantages of using a Scheduling agreement in "Subcontracting"?
A scheduling agreement for subcontracting and a purchase order with material that will be send to the vendor to manufacture the end product are two different steps in subcontracting?
Best regards

Hi,
If you have already maintained the BOM in CS01, you need not have to maintain the seperate BOM in Scheduling Agreement, because, the already existing BOM will get copied. The only thing you will have to do is that, define special procurement category as 30 (Sub-Contracting) in MRP2 view of the material master & then create the SchedulingAgreement with item category as L (Sub-Contracting).
Hope this clears.
Regards,
Prashant
- Pl. reward points if the answer is helpful to you

Excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement

Sub: in migo excise base amount is not changing as per the scheduling agreement type LP ( time dependent ).
I have created the scheduling agreement type LP with time dependent.
I have maintained the price value in two validated period i.e
01/07/08 to 31/07/08 price is 100 rs.
01/08/08 to 31/08/08 price is 200 rs.
I have maintained the delivery schedule on
15/07/08 of quantity 1 nos.
When I am doing the goods receipts for the scheduling agreement on
Document date I am giving 15/07/08.
Posting date I am giving 15/07/08.
I am giving the posting date in the excise also 15/07/08.
After item ok.
When I will the excise base value it is taking 200 and also excise duty is also calculating on 200.
When I will post the document
The stock account and GR/IR account is taking 100 only
And excise duty is posting for rs: 200 only
Why the excise base value is not changing as per the validity period.
What setting I have to do the change the excise base value as per the validity date maintained in the time dependent .
regards
jrp

dear sir
doc date and posting date i have given 15/07/08 and also excise posting date i have given 15/07/08,
but excise base value it is taking Rs:200 .
in inforecord price date category 5-goods recepit date i have given
yes i ahve changed the excise base value it will post , if i will not change the excise base value i will post rs:200 only and GR/IR clearing account will post Rs100 only.
why the excise base value will not take based on the time dependent.
regards
JRP

Kit sales - scheduling agreement

Hi experts,
When creating scheduling agreement for kit sales, the screen "schedule line" is grey. How to make it activate?
ps. For kit sales, item category for header component is TAP while sub-component is LPN. If using the scheduling agreement for NON-kit sales, it works fine.

Hi JP,
After double check, I still fail to solve it. Plz help further.
Example:
Kit sales material A includes component A1, A2. When creating scheduling agreement for A (A1 & A2 explode there), the screen "schedule line" is grey. If using A1 or A2 to create scheduling agreement, it works fine.
ps. For kit sales, header item category is TAP while sub item category is LPN.

How to update Purchase Schedule agreement

Hi Experts,
Please tell me the ,is there any Function Module/BAPI which updates Purchase Schedule Agreement(Transaction Code ME38) in SAP???
Thanks..
Debi.

Hi,
Please check this BAPI BAPI_AGREEMENT_MAINTAIN.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Subcontracting - Direct delivery with MRP and Scheduling agreements

Hi All,
can anyone suggest where I am going wrong.
I have a sub con assembly A that is made up from parts B and C.
The source of supply is:
A by VENDA
B by VENDB
C by VENDC
I do not want part B arriving on site as it is situated next door to the sub con plant. (however I might want to stock it for spare purposes later)
So I would like to send Part B directly to VENDA
I have set up a scheduling agreement for part B for VENDB and I have changed the delivery tab to VENDA and ticked the SC vendor option.
My problem is that when I run MRP I get a planned order for Part B and not a schedule line. If I remove the tick then I do indeed get a schedule line.
I have read a few posts that indicate that this can only be done via MRP areas (which we dont have).....is this really true??
Kind regards
Ben

Hi Peter,
I have looked at the possibility of converting over to MRP areas and the migration was a technical iceberg We have a lot of custom code which works along side MRP at plant level and I suspect this would require changing.
However you have triggered my curiosity again so I will have another play in my sandpit!
Take care
Ben

Sub-sequent debit in scheduling agreement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for