Suggested patches on top on OMS 12.1.0.3

Hi,
I colleague of mine suggested applying the following 3 patches on top of 12.1.0.3
-Oracle JAVA SE home - see http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpujun2013-1899847.html
-Base Platform Fusion Middleware home PSU 12.1.1.0.6 Patch 17071664
-Oracle Database Management Plug-in home Unix: BP Patch 17366505
I am hoping to get some comments from the experts as to whether or not these are really required.
Thanks
Steve.

Hi Steve,
The note suggests recommended patches for different versions of OEM. PSU 4 on top of 12.1.0.2 is the latest PSU as of now.
As per my knowledge there no PSU released for 12.1.0.3. The note will be updated when PSU for 12.1.0.3 OMS will be released.
However, you can review the Bundle Patch information in below notes once which should meet your requirement,
Enterprise Manager 12.1.0.3 Bundle Patch Master Note (Doc ID 1572022.1)
Enterprise Manager Base Platform Management Agent 12cR3 Bundle Patch Bug List (Doc ID 1580355.1)
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Biplab

Similar Messages

SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10

Hi All,
why SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10??
Thank you in advance.

Hi All,
why SMC not getting suggested patch info from Update Manager in Solaris 10??
Thank you in advance.

Mandatory iSetup patches on top of 12.1.1

Hi All,
This is Mugunthan, Development Manager for iSetup. Please apply following mandatory patches on top of 12.1.1.
1) 8602263:R12.AZ.B - 1OFF:8352532:12.1.1:12.1.1:ONDEMAND:ISETUP EXTRACT OF INVENTORY CATEGORY INFORMA
2) 8652905:R12.AZ.B - 1OFF:8424285:12.1.1:12.1.1:FRAMEWORK SUPPORT TO VALIDATE RECORDS FROM DETAILS TO
3) 8661732:R12.AZ.B - 1OFF:7608712:12.1.1:12.1.1:ISETUP DOES NOT MIGRATE SYSTEM PROFILE VALUES
4) 8599456:R12.FND.B - 1OFF:12.1.1:8441573:FNDLOAD DOWNLOAD COMMAND IS INSERTING EXTRA SPACE AFTER A NEWLINE CHARACTER
Note:
You would need 12.1.1 equivalent of 7502698:R12.GL.A(Not able to Load Accounting Setup API Data to target instance.) . Please work with GL team to get this one-off.
Thanks
Mugunthan.

Hi Mugunthan,
Thanks for the details regarding the isetup in R12.1.2 , currently we are in R12.1.2 and planning to use this for our functional setup migrations.
How difficult to setup this module to use ? What are the products it is supporting in Oracle EBS ? We are doing the implementation in all the manufaturing modules.
can you please provide the basic details to start with ?
I have gone through the article given by you "List of Manual Setup required for iSetup to work" , Is it still required in r12.1.2 ?
Please advice.
Thanks and Regards,
kannan

What are the mandatory iSetup patches on top of 12.1.2

Hi,
Our DBA's installed following patches (on top of 12.1.1)
'7651091' (Applications Technology Family : Patchset Oracle Applications Technology Release Update Pack 2 for 12.1 (R12.ATG_PF.B.DELTA.2))
'7303033' (Maintenance Pack: Oracle E-Business Suite 12.1.2 Release Update Pack (RUP2) )
Please provide us with the mandatory patches on top or 12.1.2
Thanks,
Guido

Hi Mugunthan,
Thanks for the details regarding the isetup in R12.1.2 , currently we are in R12.1.2 and planning to use this for our functional setup migrations.
How difficult to setup this module to use ? What are the products it is supporting in Oracle EBS ? We are doing the implementation in all the manufaturing modules.
can you please provide the basic details to start with ?
I have gone through the article given by you "List of Manual Setup required for iSetup to work" , Is it still required in r12.1.2 ?
Please advice.
Thanks and Regards,
kannan

Any suggested patches for CF9 communicating with SHA2

Hi. We are still running CF9 and have noticed that HTTPS calls to web services using the newer SHA2 algorithm fail. It appears that CF9 cannot support SHA2. Does anyone have a suggested patch for this issue. Obviously we need to upgrade to CF11, but that will take a couple weeks. Looking for an immediate work-around. We have two installations of CF9 - one enterprise and one standard edition. Any ideas?

Hi. We are still running CF9 and have noticed that HTTPS calls to web services using the newer SHA2 algorithm fail. It appears that CF9 cannot support SHA2. Does anyone have a suggested patch for this issue. Obviously we need to upgrade to CF11, but that will take a couple weeks. Looking for an immediate work-around. We have two installations of CF9 - one enterprise and one standard edition. Any ideas?

Applying Adobe Reader 8.1.2 Security Patch on top of Adobe Pro 7.x

Hi,
Our firm has a number of users running Adobe Standard and Professional 7.x. These users also have Adobe Reader 8 installed simultaneously as well.
According to the Adobe security bulletin below, the security patch for Adobe Standard and Professional 7.x will not be released until May 2008:
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/advisories/apsa08-01.html
Question: if we deployed Adobe Reader 8.1.2 (which addresses the same security vulnerabilities mentioned in the above link) on top of Adobe Standard and Professional 7.x, will the vulnerability be fixed? The businesses will not be upgrading to Adobe Standard / Professional 8.1.2.
Thank you,
Roland Thomas

Not to make excuses or anything but, it's more than a security patch.
http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=kb403079&sliceId=1

Suggestion : Have the "Top Users in Forum" report based on 30 days

Currently, the "Top Users in Forum" listing is based on cumulative points. This means that we will never see "rising stars !".
If the list were to report based on, say, points earned in the past 30 days, we'd at least be able to note some "rising stars !"
Hemant K Chitale

Hemant K Chitale wrote:
Currently, the "Top Users in Forum" listing is based on cumulative points. This means that we will never see "rising stars !".
If the list were to report based on, say, points earned in the past 30 days, we'd at least be able to note some "rising stars !"
Hemant K ChitaleCan Jive handle the extra processing required to maintain both overall points for the persons status AND points in the last 30 days for the Top Users lists, per forum? Jeez, it can hardly handle serving the threads, don't give it more work to do. If we want anything we want the little dotty things back, at least they were useful, unlike the points system.

Oracle 9.2.0.8 patch installation problem on top of 9.2.0.4 installation

I'm trying to install the 9.2.0.8 patch on top of my 9.2.0.4 Oracle installation on Fedora 8 OS and I'm not able to get the installer going. After I get the first screen, it displays for the Oracle_HOME screen and when I press next here, I get the following error:
java: xcb_xlib.c:50: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.
If anyone was successful in this installation, please let me know what I have to do to get past this error and get a successful installation.

More or less similar problem reported in following thread
Install 11g on Fedora 8?

JUL09 CPU Patch for EMREP DB.

All,
I recently installed 10gR5 Grid Control, and the database that comes bundled with the installation is Oracle Database 10g 10.1.0.5.0.
Well the JUL09 CPU Patch for this database was released, but the patch is in extended support. What does the community recommend as a best practice in this case? Upgrade the database to Oracle Database 10g 10.2.0.4.0?
Any suggestions would be fantastic. Thanks!

Yes that is what I did and it worked great.
Now when I upgraded the 10.1.0.5 repository for another server's Application Server and deinstalled the old version of the database from the infrastructure home, it could not update the inventory information correctly and now I always have a 10.1.0.5 entry in the console's main page showing zero installations. Anybody know of a workaround?
Also do not apply the cpujul2009 (Patch 8537032) to the OMS home. It screws up the job system. I tried it twice with the same results.

Slipstreaming Patches into Oracle Apps

Hi All
For many patches like family packs,rollup patches etc, we can install these patches after the installation of the EBS. But is it possible to integrate these patches into the installation software so that as soon as the EBS is installed there is no need for seperately installing these patch files.(Just as we can slipstream the service packs in Windows OS).
Regards
Rahman

Hi Rahman,
The EBS is a huge stack of cross-platform software, and every patch has dependencies, so it is very tough (or impossible) for Oracle to take every patch and regression it back to the base release. Also, I've just installed Windows XP SP2 and the number of post-install updates was huge ... so I fail to see your point with regards to Windows.
If the reason you are asking the question is that you are responsible for delivering multiple installs of EBS to a single O/S, then I'd have a couple of possible suggestions:
1. Apply the patches to one instance to create a "golden" image and use a cloning procedure to roll it out wherever you need to install it, rather than reinstall.
2. Create a single admrgpch of all the patches on top of your install ... and apply that after doing your install, but this wouldn't account for tech stack upgrade, so option 1 is better.
3. Wait for the next maintenance pack!
PS. Oracle has come along way, the first "rapid" install was called 1 hour install. Yeah Right! Which delivered a preconfigured and installed database was a huge leap forward. Another nice progression that I haven't seen yet which I've mentioned in passing on my blog is for Oracle to provide a virtual appliance - which could possibly extend to what you're implying here but would be particularly useful for demo systems.
Gareth
Blog: http://garethroberts.blogspot.com

Top,squid

Hi people!
I have dual P2 sever under solaris8x68 MU6 applied running squid-2.4.STABLE6.
# uname -a
SunOS moon 5.8 Generic_108529-14 i86pc i386 i86pc
Q1.
In squid's cache.log even under small loading (about 30 clients) every 8-10 minutes appear following records:
2002/07/02 11:00:16| comm_accept: FD 53: (130) Software caused connection abort
2002/07/02 11:00:16| httpAccept: FD 53: accept failure: (130) Software caused connection abort
With about 100 simultaneous clients that records repeated every 2-3 minutes.
How can i correct this situation?
Q2.
Is it possible to patch the top so that it could display loading of both processors. Currently I use top-3.5beta12.
Thank you.

Great suggestions. Don't forget to log an enhancement request with newScale so that Product Management can know about this. Suggestions made here need to also be entered into newScale.

Getting error while applying psu patch on 11.2.0.2.0

Hi All,
I am getting one error while applying psu july patch on top of 11.2.0.2.0
If anybody has the solution please answer:
Below is the code sample:
[oracle@host01 16619893]$ opatch prereq CheckConflictAgainstOHWithDetail -phBase                                                       Dir ./16619893
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.2.0.3.4
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
PREREQ session
Oracle Home       : /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
Central Inventory : /u002/app/oraInventory
   from           : /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/oraInst.loc
OPatch version    : 11.2.0.3.4
OUI version       : 11.2.0.2.0
Log file location : /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/cfgtoollogs/opatch/                                                       opatch2013-06-28_02-08-44AM_1.log
Invoking prereq "checkconflictagainstohwithdetail"
Prereq "checkConflictAgainstOHWithDetail" passed.
OPatch succeeded.
[oracle@host01 16619893]$ opatch apply
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.2.0.3.4
Copyright (c) 2012, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home       : /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
Central Inventory : /u002/app/oraInventory
   from           : /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/oraInst.loc
OPatch version    : 11.2.0.3.4
OUI version       : 11.2.0.2.0
Log file location : /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/cfgtoollogs/opatch/                                                       opatch2013-06-28_02-10-02AM_1.log
Verifying environment and performing prerequisite checks...
Prerequisite check "CheckActiveFilesAndExecutables" failed.
The details are:
Following executables are active :
/u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/lib/libclntsh.so.11.1
UtilSession failed: Prerequisite check "CheckActiveFilesAndExecutables" failed.
Log file location: /u002/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/cfgtoollogs/opatch/o                                                       patch2013-06-28_02-10-02AM_1.log
OPatch failed with error code 73
[oracle@host01 16619893]$ ps -ef |grep libclntsh.so.11.1
oracle   15943 15446 0 02:11 pts/3    00:00:00 grep libclntsh.so.11.1
[oracle@host01 16619893]$
Why I am getting that error? And how to check wheather lobclntsh.so.11.1 is running and how to kill it?
Thanks in advance.

See the below link
Oracle DBA and RAC DBA Expert: Reason: Cannot apply patch due to fatal error & CheckActiveFilesAndExecutables failed
I hope it resolves your issue.
Regards,
http://www.oracleracexpert.com

Why Using Top Link is best in DB Adapter?

Hi All,
Can any one suggest , Why Using Top Link (Build-in Insert, Select etc. operation) is best in DB Adapter over using custom query?
Thanks

Hi Vikky,
for insert/select it depends on what kind of user you are. TopLink lets you browse and click on a tables and have everything generated for you. If you are more a DBA or show me the SQL type then you can just type SQL directly.
Some advantages of TopLink would be:
-The range of SQL generated by TopLink is limited, but if you hard code complex SQL into your service you need to maintain it.
-TopLink can generate at runtime the correct SQL for a given database, making switching from say DB2 to Oracle easy.
-The merge operation will compare the input XML to the columns on the database and update only what has changed. It can also do a sparse merge. If only 4 columns in the XML were set, only those 4 columns in the database will be updated.
-For inbound polling the strategy used (LogicalDelete, Sequencing Table, etc) is a configuration property and then at runtime multiple SQL statements are generated. The SQL also takes advantage of advanced syntax like the Oracle-only FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED, writing it all yourself may be tedious and error prone.
-The main benefit of TopLink is when you go beyond thinking about a single table. If you import multiple related tables at once, TopLink will generate the SQL to select from and maintain multiple tables, establish a commit order, and generate a hierarchical XSD. With custom SQL the matching XSD is always flat. I.e. if you just need to insert an emp you could get away with custom SQL. If you need to insert a dept and emps, I would use TopLink.
-This is also when the intermediary abstraction of an object/table makes more sense, as you only need to import a complex relational schema once, then generate inserts, selects, etc.
So I hope that helps. They are each equally viable and can do something that the other can't. Where you see an overlap I would go with personal preference.
Thanks
Steve

Trying to find-out if any PSU/patches present in the Oracle_Home

Hi Experts,
I have a Oracle_Home copied from a different server and using which , we have created a DB and it is being used for Agile applications.
But , initially , after the DB creation , we have not configure the inventory for the Oracle_Home.
And today , when we recreated the inventory, It completed successfully. And below is the output of it.
But , we are just confused why the interim patch/PSU details are not displayed.
-> Is that because , there are no interim patches/PSU installed in the Source Oracle_HOme ??
-> Or , is that when oracle_Home clone is done , it doesn't display those details ??
Note : The source environment from where we copied the oracle_Home is copied is not existing now. So, we don't have a chance to compare.
==========================================================================
[oraoclp@PRODDB ~]$ opatch lsinventory
Invoking OPatch 11.2.0.1.1
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.2.0.1.1
Copyright (c) 2009, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Oracle Home       : /u01/app/oraoclp/product/11.2.0
Central Inventory : /u01/app/oraoclp/oraInventory
   from           : /etc/oraInst.loc
OPatch version    : 11.2.0.1.1
OUI version       : 11.2.0.2.0
OUI location      : /u01/app/oraoclp/product/11.2.0/oui
Log file location : /u01/app/oraoclp/product/11.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2013-09-16_00-31-12AM.log
Patch history file: /u01/app/oraoclp/product/11.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch_history.txt
Lsinventory Output file location : /u01/app/oraoclp/product/11.2.0/cfgtoollogs/opatch/lsinv/lsinventory2013-09-16_00-31-12AM.txt
Installed Top-level Products (2):
Oracle Database 11g                                                  11.2.0.2.0
Oracle Database 11g Examples                                         11.2.0.2.0
There are 2 products installed in this Oracle Home.
There are no Interim patches installed in this Oracle Home.
OPatch succeeded.

The opatch just shows what you installed on top of the originally installed software.
In your case, it looks like you installed 11.2.0.2 but no patches on top of it. That's it.
>Note : The source environment from where we copied the oracle_Home is copied is not existing now. So, we don't have a chance to compare.
I do not understand what it means.
Nicolas.

Failing 10.2.3.2 audit vault patch on AV Agent at AV Configuation Assistant

Hi,
Applying 10.2.3.2 audit vault patch on top of 10.2.3.0 Audit Vault Agent. Getting following error after 100% installation at the time of Audit Vault Configuation Assistant Components
Information from Installxxxxxx.log
OPatch succeeded.
INFO: Configuration assistant "Oracle Audit Vault Agent One-Off Patches" succeeded
INFO: Command = oracle.av.common.AvcaCfgPlugIn /oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/bin/avca -s initialize_agent -agentname agent_hmrac2 -agentusr ${s_agentusr} -agentport 7016 -av HMCSPV0921.HIGHMARK.INTRA:1522:av.HIGHMARK.INTRA -rmiport 3121 -jmsport 3300
INFO: Configuration assistant "Oracle Audit Vault Configuration Assistant" succeeded
INFO: All the tools have been executed Successfully
INFO: The "/oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/cfgtoollogs/configToolAllCommands" script contains all commands to be executed by the configuration assistants. This file may be used to run the configuration assistants outside of OUI. Note that you may have to update this script with passwords (if any) before executing the same.
WARNING:
The following configuration scripts need to be executed as the "root" user.
#!/bin/sh
#Root script to run
/oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/root.sh
To execute the configuration scripts:
1. Open a terminal window
2. Log in as "root"
3. Run the scripts
4. Return to this window and click "OK" to continue
INFO:
*** End of Installation Page***
The installation of Oracle Audit Vault Agent 10g was successful.
WARNING: Do you really want to exit?
INFO: User Selected: Yes/OK
INFO: The OUICA command is launched from /oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/oui/bin/ouica.sh.
Executed *"/oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/cfgtoollogs/configToolAllCommands* which has following command and successful.
[oracle@HMCSPS02 oui]$ cat "/oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/cfgtoollogs/configToolAllCommands"
# Copyright (c) 1999, 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved.
/oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/bin/avca apply_patchset
[oracle@HMCSPS02 oui]$ echo $ORACLE_HOME
/oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1
[oracle@HMCSPS02 oui]$ sh /oracle/app/oracle/product/10.2.3/av_1/bin/avca apply_patchset
Deploying to standalone OC4J...
Restarting agent ...
Agent restarted successfully.
Retried component but again failed. Hence executed root.sh and clicked 'Next' button. then message got like 'Agent 10.2.3.2 Installation was successful but some of the components missing,skipped or cancelled which may be functioning properly.
has my patch upgrade to client was successful or what is the workaround ???
Any help on this would be appreciated...
Regards,
Manish

Sorry, it was my mistake.
Actually while upgradation to 10.2.3.2, my ORACLE_HOME was not set to AV Agent HOME (instead it was set for AV Server HOME). That is why at the end script was unable to run from respective HOME.
Conclusion: Make sure to set ORACLE_HOME to AV Agent HOME before applying to 10.2.3.2 patchset to AV Agent. (also Valid for all Oracle Patchset Installation)
thanks for your support and reply.
Regards,
Manish

Suggested patches on top on OMS 12.1.0.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for