Summarize Comp Planning Changes Report

It seems we are having issues with this report and I wanted to see if anyone else has experienced the same.
When we run the report the Total Guideline Amount column populates sometimes for some employees and leaves just a zero on the others. I have checked to ensure these employees should have a guideline amount and there are no differences between the ones who do show and the ones who don't.
Has anyone experience this?

Hi,
You need to have additional characteristics for User & Date in your RTP to record who changed when and what plan record.
Then you can create a characteristic relationship of type 'Exit Class' to derive User Id(last changed by) and the date(last modified).
Itu2019s not necessary to include User-ID and Date in any of the aggregation levels, but the Source Characteristic(Company code may be in your case) based on which the values are derived for User-ID & Date, must be present in each aggregation level.
Then create a custom class say ZCL_LOC_CR_LINE_ITEM by taking class CL_RSPLS_CR_EXIT_BASE as super class and then redefine the method DERIVE of interface IF_RSPLS_CR_METHODS in your class.
You can write following code in your method DERIVE:
CLEAR e_t_mesg.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <l_chavl> TYPE ANY.
ASSIGN COMPONENT '/BIC/ZUSERID' OF STRUCTURE c_s_chas TO <l_chavl>.
<l_chavl> = sy-uname.
ASSIGN COMPONENT '0DATE' OF STRUCTURE c_s_chas TO <l_chavl>.
<l_chavl> = sy-datlo.
This will solve your purpose.
Regards,
Deepti

Similar Messages

VERIZON WIRELESS PLAN CHANGES, CONTRACTS, UPGRADES - Lack of Customer Service!

I have been 1 of your customers since August of 2006.
I even own a 2nd phone line that I have been using since approximately 2002
Most recently I had inquired with Verizon Customer service about upgrading my cell phone from a BlackBerry to a Droid Maxx (for one of my accounts)
My first inquiry was with a Verizon Rep on the Verizon Online Chat on February 16, 2014. I told her that I wanted to upgrade my cell phone from a BlackBerry to a Droid Maxx, and I inquired about my Unlimited Data Plan. She said I would “not” lose my Unlimited Data Plan even if I upgraded to a Droid Maxx. I also asked about a Hot Spot, and she said that would be “included in my Unlimited Data Plan” at no extra charge.
I called Verizon 611 later that same evening and talked live with a Verizon Rep, again asking and confirming the answers to the same questions. I also asked about “throttling” if I went beyond a certain usage on my data plan, if I upgraded to a new cell phone. He told me that I would not be limited to certain speeds and bandwidth, no matter how much I used my cell phone since Verizon does not throttle their customers’ data speeds (since Verizon had received so many complaints in the past for throttling, so they do not do that anymore). He also said there would “not be an issue with upgrading to a new cell phone and keeping my current data plan.
A few days later, as I looked further into upgrading my device, and trying to make a final decision, I again called Verizon 611 – Customer Service. But this time the Verizon Rep that I talked to contradicted the other two Verizon Reps info because he told me that I would “lose my unlimited data plan” if I switched to a new cell phone. He also said if I made any changes to my plan, I would lose my Unlimited Data. He said there would also be an additional charge for a Hot Spot. I asked about bringing on a 2nd person to my plan, and keeping Unlimited Data on one of the phones, while having a 2nd data plan package for the other phone for the additional person. He told me the Unlimited Data Plan would only apply to the Original phone on this account and the original phone number. But if I added a 2nd person/phone to my account they would “not” have Unlimited Data since the new (2nd phone) was not grand-fathered in to this current plan that I had with Verizon.
Finally I decided to go in person to visit a Verizon Store. When I went into the Verizon Store at Jantzen Beach, North Portland, Oregon, the Rep I talked to said she had been with Verizon for almost 8 years. She said all of the info that the other “3” Verizon Reps had given me was “not” accurate. At this time, I learned that “ANY/ALL changes to my plans would immediately make me lose my Unlimited Data Plan. And the ONLY way I could keep this plan, would be to buy my own cell phone (at full Retail cost) and have it added to my account. And that if I tried to add a Hot Spot, it would cost additional money outside of my data plan. Also if I tried to add a 2nd person/cell phone to my existing account that I would immediately lose the Unlimited Data Plan. I was not allowed to change my cell phone#, add any additional user or cell phone, or upgrade my device without losing my Unlimited Data. She also said maybe I was told something different by the 611 Customer Service Reps because they have authority to make changes or exceptions to plans, and that normal Verizon Store employees do not have authority to make the same changes.
My complaint and question to Verizon is…..WHY do all “4” Verizon Reps have different explanations, advice, rules, etc…when it comes to something as simple as upgrading to a new device and wanting to keep my current plan? To me, the rules and explanations should not vary day to day, and depending upon who I talk to?
I was originally an AT&T Customer prior to 2006 and I switched to Verizon. This is my first real experience with HORRIBLE customer service and deception from Verizon!
IF I had made any changes when I initially or immediately after I inquired via the Online Chat, I would have LOST my current data plan! And then to tell me that I need to go out & buy my OWN phone at FULL Retail price If I want to keep a plan that I’ve had for years now!!!
How much money have I already paid to Verizon in Monthly usage charges since 2006 (for almost 8 years now)??? And you want to reward me for this loyalty and being a Long time customer by cheating me out of my current plan, or trying to deceive me with false promises that I won’t lose the plan? And then when I finally do want to upgrade, you will take that plan from me? And even after being a customer for 8 years with one account and almost 12 years with my 2nd Verizon account (that I listed at the beginning of this letter), you won’t even offer to give me a free device or a discounted device for renewing my plan? NOW I need to buy my own phone if I want to continue on with my current data plan?
None of this makes sense, and I have now been told “4” different versions of rules, exceptions and Plan change policies by 4 different Verizon Reps! They ALL work for the same company --- Verizon Wireless --- so they should ALL have the same answers and rules, right? I really feel nobody is being honest & upfront with me about this, and I am seriously considering moving back to AT&T Wireless. As at this point, Verizon wants to do nothing to reward me for being a long-time customer. I’m beginning to feel that the goal here is to deceive me and cheat me out of my Unlimited Data plan.
What can you do to make this right? I know you must have record of the Online Chat and also you record 611 Customer Service calls too? How can you explain why all “4” of your Reps have different rules and explanations for Verizon phone plans?
If I do not receive an acceptable response to this letter, you can count on me moving back to AT &T Wireless. I will also tell all of my Friends & Family that are currently with Verizon about this negative experience. In the past I have encouraged others to move to Verizon Wireless, but now I no longer feel that is good advice for anyone.
My boyfriend who “almost considered” switching his service to Verizon, is now seriously considering the integrity of Verizon. He works in Information Technology with large corporations and will also pass this story on to his business associates.
I look forward to your response and explanation. I feel that after my long term loyalty as a Verizon Customer, I deserve much better treatment and honest answers from Verizon.

cheralin333 wrote:
I find this all very interesting that the 3 responses I got to this post are ALL defending Verizon jacking around a long time customer. I would almost venture to guess that Verizon hires people (probably in India & Pakistan) to read their forums and defend whatever they do to their customers. How do I become the bad person for wanting good customer service? How are they in the right for trying to be deceitful. None of their Reps had the "same story or info." NOW I have 3 responses from "supposed PEERS" or other customers in the Verizon Community. But instead of rallying with me as a customer all 3 are posting comments like they "work for Verizon." And even Ann's response contained info that I already had in my original post. And this last post from pherson knocks me for not being loyal?? I have been loyal for over a decade but why would I kiss up to anyone that is trying to make me take it in the shorts??? I'm convinced you are all making minimum wage from Verizon to read their forums and defend their ridiculous practices. Go find a real job.
No one is "defending" Verizon. We are telling you that
A) No one from Verizon corporate will see you post
B) Even if they did they are not going to change policy because 1 customer or a few or 1000 or 10,000 threaten to leave.
So there is no point to your rant. It was waste of time. The people you intended it for aren't going to see or care. Also the FCC, FTC, BBB, etc etc are also a waste of time. The only thing you can do that you have power over is to speak with your wallet and go elsewhere. That would be FAR more productive than what you've done here. I still don't get how people think that because they made a post on a messageboard they can change things. Like people haven't been complaining about this for literally the last 620 days. How's that worked out so far?
Oh and I SHOULD report your post that is full of insults. Next one I WILL. How is that for a threat?

Dial plan change.Internal calls are dialing slow

Hi,
I have made dial plan change in one customer from 3 digits to 2.But there is an IVR with CTI ports with 3 digits and the first digit is overlapping with some 2 digits phones. So when you try to dial for example number 61 the CUCM is waiting for the interdigit timeout because the CTI RP is with number 600.And there are some hunt pilots with 3 digits. So I have decided to move all 3 digits CTIs and hunt pilots to different partition and exclude them from the internal partition, but the problem still exists. So let say I have:
pt_1
css_1 (includes only pt_1)
pt_2
css_2 (includes only pt_2)
Phone 1
DN 10
pt_1
css_1
Phone 2
DN 20
pt_1
css_1
Phone 3
DN 100
pt_2
css_2
Phone 4
DN 200
pt_2
css_2
Why when I call phone 1 from phone 2 the cucm is waiting for the interdigit timeout, but when I call phone 3 from phone 4 no problem?
Thanks for the help.

Hi there,
Is it possible for you to attach your Route Plan report .csv
for us to have a look at. Maybe we can help identify the overlap.
Cheers!
Rob

Comp Planning - 2 Level Approval

Hi comp gurus ( I am coining a new Variation of Guru here ),
System Landscape
ECC 6.0
ECM ( Enterprise compensation Management)
EP 7.0
Currently we have deployed the Enterprise compensation management module. We have a standard compensation scenario where the comp planners use the comp planning screen( Via MSS) to perform the comp planning and the comp approvers, use the comp approval screen to approve the planned(submitted) compensation.
But we have a slightly different scenario where we want to have 2 levels of approvals before the comp record is set to 'Approved' status in IT 0759.
Let me explain it in detail
Lets assume that we have Manager A who is the manager of B, B is the manager of C and C is the manager of D.
C performs comp planning for D. A record is created in IT0759 for D in planning/submitted status. B can now log on and approve the comp planning/submitted comp records by C. Here we do not want the planning record to set to "approved" status when it is approved by B. But we want this to go to Manager A who can then give the final approval and only then should the record in IT0759 status be changed to Approved.
The matters gets more complicated by the fact that, the comp planners and approvers see the data(in MSS) based on OADP and not based on any workflows. Obviously I cannot create a new status for the IT0759 records. Based on your experience what is the best way to handle these scenario.
Any suggestions
regards
Raj
Edited by: Raj Kishore on Jul 10, 2008 2:46 PM

Santosh I really appreciate your inputs.
I just think that this approach would bring in a lot of enhancements
I would have to change the underlying FMs to trigger WF rather than the IT0759 "status" change FM. Build WFs. Change OADP "status" update FM, and other changes which I may get to know when we start designing the solution if we go this way. But I would (infact am) surely consider this option. But I will be really suprised, if I will have to go thsi route. Adding another approval level seems to me a pretty common requirement and if this involves a major development and maintanance effort, the clients will not be happy
Can others also please provide your inputs here.
regards
Raj

Comp Planning - 2 Level approvals

ECM i so tightly integrated in MSS that I am trying my luck by posting this message in this forumn as well
Hi comp gurus ( I am coining a new Variation of Guru here ),
System Landscape
ECC 6.0
ECM ( Enterprise compensation Management)
EP 7.0
Currently we have deployed the Enterprise compensation management module. We have a standard compensation scenario where the comp planners use the comp planning screen( Via MSS) to perform the comp planning and the comp approvers, use the comp approval screen to approve the planned(submitted) compensation.
But we have a slightly different scenario where we want to have 2 levels of approvals before the comp record is set to 'Approved' status in IT 0759.
Let me explain it in detail
Lets assume that we have Manager A who is the manager of B, B is the manager of C and C is the manager of D.
C performs comp planning for D. A record is created in IT0759 for D in planning/submitted status. B can now log on and approve the comp planning/submitted comp records by C. Here we do not want the planning record to set to "approved" status when it is approved by B. But we want this to go to Manager A who can then give the final approval and only then should the record in IT0759 status be changed to Approved.
The matters gets more complicated by the fact that, the comp planners and approvers see the data(in MSS) based on OADP and not based on any workflows. Obviously I cannot create a new status for the IT0759 records. Based on your experience what is the best way to handle these scenario.
Any suggestions
regards
Raj

Have you looked at using the 'Implicit Enhancements' options available in the function module HR_ECM_CHANGE_PROC_STATUS? I think you can reset the status from 'approved' to 'submitted' at the end of the standard code & send out an email to the next level manager. I'm guessing there will not be a need to change anything else.
~Suresh

Comp Planning MSS iview display

Hi All,
I am currently working on LTI plans ECM and on the compensation planning iview on the portal, ones the manager selects the org unit, it displays all the employees belonging to the org unit with the status as eligible or ineligible for the LTI plan based on the config.
But I want to display only the employees eligible for the LTI plans on the comp planning iview and not all the employees within the reporting structue. Can someone please tell me how to achieve this on the MSS iview for comp planning.
I really appreciate any help in this regard.
Thanks

Resolved OSS note: 919298

Test Plan Progress report parameter

I'm trying to use the Test Plan Progress report but the Test Plan field is always empty therefore I cannot render the report.
The TFS is 2013 update 4 and I tried also with the report downloaded from MSF for Agile Software Development 2013.4 template. The cube is processed with no errors.
Any ideas?

Looking further I noticed that the MDX query that is populating the report parameter is not returning any data.
Could this be a breaking change for the report from the last TFS update?
Below is the query generated by the report:
WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[ParameterCaption] AS
IIF([Test Plan].[Test Plan Name].CURRENTMEMBER IS [Test Plan].[Test Plan Name].[All],
"All (No Filter)",
[Test Plan].[Test Plan Name].CurrentMember.Member_Caption
MEMBER [Measures].[ParameterValue] AS
[Test Plan].[Test Plan ID].CurrentMember.UniqueName
SELECT
[Measures].[Point Count Trend],
[Measures].[ParameterValue],
[Measures].[ParameterCaption]
} ON COLUMNS,
([Test Plan].[Test Plan ID].[All], [Test Plan].[Test Plan Name].[All]) +
Extract(
[Test Plan].[Test Plan ID].[All],
[Test Plan].[Test Plan Name].[All],
[Team Project].[Project Node GUID].[All],
[Test Case].[Area Hierarchy].[All],
[Test Plan].[Iteration Hierarchy].[All]
) +
Filter(
CrossJoin(
[Test Plan].[Test Plan ID].[Test Plan ID],
[Test Plan].[Test Plan Name].[Test Plan Name],
StrToMember("[Team Project].[Project Node GUID].&[{4dad3f77-6199-41eb-af5a-a95f93b6af18}]"),
StrToSet("[Test Case].[Area Hierarchy].[All]"),
StrToSet("[Test Plan].[Iteration Hierarchy].[All]")
[Measures].[Point Count Trend]
[Test Plan].[Test Plan ID], [Test Plan].[Test Plan Name]
} ON ROWS
FROM [Team System]

Performance problem: Query explain plan changes in pl/sql vs. literal args

I have a complex query with 5+ table joins on large (million+ row) tables. In it's most simplified form, it's essentially
select * from largeTable large
join anotherLargeTable anothr on (anothr.id_2 = large.pk_id)
join...(other aux tables)
where large.pk_id between 123 and 456;
Its performance was excellent with literal arguments (1 sec per execution).
But, when I used pl/sql bind argument variables instead of 123 and 456 as literals, the explain plan changes drastically, and runs 10+ minutes.
Ex:
CREATE PROCEDURE runQuery(param1 INTEGER, param2 INTEGER){
CURSOR LT_CURSOR IS
select * from largeTable large
join anotherLargeTable anothr on (anothr.id_2 = large.pk_id)
join...(other aux tables)
where large.pk_id between param1 AND param2;
BEGIN
FOR aRecord IN LT_CURSOR
LOOP
(print timestamp...)
END LOOP;
END runQuery;
Rewriting the query 5 different ways was unfruitful. DB hints were also unfruitful in this particular case. LargeTable.pk_id was an indexed field as were all other join fields.
Solution:
Lacking other options, I wrote a literal query that concatenated the variable args. Open a cursor for the literal query.
Upside: It changed the explain plan to the only really fast option and performed at 1 second instead of 10mins.
Downside: Query not cached for future use. Perfectly fine for this query's purpose.
Other suggestions are welcome.

AmandaSoosai wrote:
I have a complex query with 5+ table joins on large (million+ row) tables. In it's most simplified form, it's essentially
select * from largeTable large
join anotherLargeTable anothr on (anothr.id_2 = large.pk_id)
join...(other aux tables)
where large.pk_id between 123 and 456;
Its performance was excellent with literal arguments (1 sec per execution).
But, when I used pl/sql bind argument variables instead of 123 and 456 as literals, the explain plan changes drastically, and runs 10+ minutes.
Ex:
CREATE PROCEDURE runQuery(param1 INTEGER, param2 INTEGER){
CURSOR LT_CURSOR IS
select * from largeTable large
join anotherLargeTable anothr on (anothr.id_2 = large.pk_id)
join...(other aux tables)
where large.pk_id between param1 AND param2;
BEGIN
FOR aRecord IN LT_CURSOR
LOOP
(print timestamp...)
END LOOP;
END runQuery;
Rewriting the query 5 different ways was unfruitful. DB hints were also unfruitful in this particular case. LargeTable.pk_id was an indexed field as were all other join fields.
Solution:
Lacking other options, I wrote a literal query that concatenated the variable args. Open a cursor for the literal query.
Upside: It changed the explain plan to the only really fast option and performed at 1 second instead of 10mins.
Downside: Query not cached for future use. Perfectly fine for this query's purpose.
Other suggestions are welcome.Best wild guess based on what you've posted is a bind variable mismatch (your column is declared as a NUMBER data type and your bind variable is declared as a VARCHAR for example). Unless you have histograms on the columns in question ... which, if you're using bind variables is usually a really bad idea.
A basic illustration of my guess
http://blogs.oracle.com/optimizer/entry/how_do_i_get_sql_executed_from_an_application_to_uses_the_same_execution_plan_i_get_from_sqlplus

Purchase order price change report

Hello
How to retieve the purchase order price change report ? do we have any standard report for it or any table which gives these data?
kindl

HI
Have you activate version management at your end for PO,i think this will help you to track changes of PO for qty,price etc.
[http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/Version+Management]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

11.1.2 Planning – Mapping Reporting Application

Hi John,
I was reading one of your blog
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/2010/06/1112-planning-mapping-reporting.html
I want to know what is the advantage of using "Mapping Reporting Application" over replicated partioning, and also what should be the real use of "Mapping Reporting Application"
One example of why you may want to use this functionality is you say you have a reporting database such as an ASO database reporting actuals and you want to push a proportion of the forecast/budget data from the planning application into the ASO model. It could also be that you have a number of different cubes that you need to push different areas of data to from your planning application
When I first read about this new functionality I assumed it would create a replicated partition and push the data to the mapped database, I thought it would manage the partition so it wasn’t destroyed with a refresh, this is not the way it works though but more about that later.Can you please explain me in detail about the way of working of this functionality
Thanks & Regards,
Avneet Singh Bhatia

I don't know if there is any advantage, it is just a different way going about it, the planning method exports and then loads the data, is that better than a replicated partition I am not sure but everybody has there own opinions.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Change report S_ALR_87012168 - 0SAPDUEAN-01

I am in FDI2 for changing report 0SAPDUEAN-01-Due Date Analysis for Open Items. I would like to add one more characteristic in the list available in the right hand side. Currently there are only 26 characteristics available for selection

Hi Suma,
In my last project I worked a lot on that to add new characteristic but I didn't get in clue. If you get any idea that would be great.
Best of luck
Sreenivas

How to change report displayname at runtime when run from the report server?

hi all,
with the reportviewer widget in a winforms app, i'm able to change report displayname at runtime by handling thesubmittingparametervalues event like so:
        private void reportViewer1_SubmittingParameterValues(object sender, ReportParametersEventArgs e)
            string po = e.Parameters["Order"].Values[0];
            this.reportViewer1.ServerReport.DisplayName = "Load Out - " + po + " - " + DateTime.Now.ToShortDateString();
question: how do i achieve the same thing when the report is run via the ssrs reportserver website?
thanks for any tips,
sff

Hi sherifffruitfly2,
According to your description, you want to change the display name of report in Report Manager. Right?
In Reporting Services, we can't make the report file name dynamically. But we have Build-in Fields to show report name and execution time in a report. We can add a textbox and put in the expression below:
="Load on- "+Globals!ReportName+" "+Globals!ExecutionTime
It will show the report name with execution time when we run the report:
Reference:
Built-in Collections in Expressions (Report Builder and SSRS)
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

Order cost plan in report CN41N

Hi Gurus,
Would appreciate if any one of share what is 'Order Cost Plan" in report CN41N.
Infact, the values displayed in Order cost plan column neither coincide with either Project Cost Plan nor Actual cost displayed.
Looking forward to hear and thaks in advnace.
Thanks,
PSR

Hi PSR,
Order Cost Plan in CN41N is PM Order Plan Costs figure.
If you create PM Order and assign WBS Element/Project Def in Additional Data Tab of PM Order after planning Material services system will consider WBSE as Costing object and Plan and Post cost on WBSE. It will appears in CN41N in Order Cost Plan column.
Please check
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Swapnil Kharul.

How can I change reports in report painter.

Dear Consultants,
I need to change report according to client requirment.
1, Lay out change in std report.
2, How can I customize report to get cost element group wise with sub totals one by one.
Please tell me how to do it step by step, I'll will award full points.
Kind regards,
Arvey.

Dear Arvey,
1. Layout can be changes by going into report painter change transaction GRR2, selecting the report (by double click) and then going to Formatting-->Report layout.
2. Second question is not very clear to me. pls provide more detail.
Regards,

Problems with Plan Change - Needs Immediate Result

Hello,
I have been a long time Verizon Wireless customer. I have two lines, one of which was assigned to a tablet with a 1gb plan. I maintained this line for the upgrade since my other line has unlimited data. I recently upgraded to the Note 3, and in the process was told that I'd have to establish a new line to accomplish the upgrade. The representative, from Costco, let me know that it shouldn't be a problem transferring the same plan to the newly established line and not to worry about anything going wrong. That night I called Verizon for the first time and worked with a customer service representative who ended up making the problem worse by canceling the tablet line before transferringthe device to the new line. This caused a problem with my sim card, and I have to request a new one because my old was was constantly showing an "aging" status. Even a few days later. The first night consisted of two phone calls to Verizon because the rep mentioned above ended up disconnecting me trying to get over to tech support. The second rep was much more helpful, but wasn't able to do anything and let me know I'd have to work with tech support, but should wait until the next day to allow the sim to "age."
The next day was the 4th of July, so I called back the next day and went through a similar process, spent about 30 minutes with one rep, only to be told my sim was still "ageing" and to talk to tech support. Every time I was connected with tech support it was a minimum 30 minute wait, just to be told that there was nothing they could do, again, and they sent me a new sim card. When i received that sim, at which point it was the following week, I called back and activated my tablet successfully. Hung the phone up and thought all was well, until I saw my balance due the next day. It was nearly double what I usually pay. The representative never informed me that it would default to a prorated amount based on that payment, of 4gb. None of which I need. I called back, again, and was told that I wasn't able to use the old plan I had since it didn't exist anymore. This time the representative was very pleasant, and let me know she'd put a request in to see if the old plan would be possible, given my situation. I was alright with that, and this was the first time I wasn't frustrated after hanging up the phone.
She called me back yesterday letting me know that Verizon isn't willing to allow me to use my old plan, and that there is a new plan options, that is 10 dollars a month. Honestly that was all right, so I called in today to change it to that plan and have it backdated to the date of upgrade to fix my billing issue. During the process of looking up my information, the representative I spoke with today disconnected me. Over the last week and a half I have spent nearly 3-4 hours on the phone with Verizon just trying to fix this issue that was not anything I could have controlled.
The rep at Costco told me I'd have no issues transferring my lien to the new line we opened that day, and the first individual I spoke with on the phone canceled the line too early and further delayed the process by requiring me to request a new SIM card for the tablet. After being disconnected this time, I'm extremely frustrated with the entire situation and Verizon in general. I've been a customer of Verizon for nearly ten years, and for the fist time I am considering moving to another carrier seeing. In that ten year period, I have probably called into customer service less than 5 times. And in the last week and a half I have made more calls, and spent far more time on the phone than every before.
The bottom line is, I need to have the plan changed on my tablet line to something comparable to what I had previously, which was a 20 dollar, 1gb plan with the 10 dollar tablet fee. I need this taken care of ASAP and I need to know it's being done correctly. If Verizon is going to partner with companies like Costco to provide phones to members, and increase their customer base, than these reps need to be better equipped to handle the upgrade process. And it seems that the call centers I have spoken with are a 50/50 shot in terms of reaching someone who is able to do their job effectively and in a timely fashion.
I hope to be contacted with a resolution by today or I will be returning the phone, and looking elsewhere for my wireless needs.
Thank you.
Josh

There is an "undocumented" parameter you need to include in your
page. It MUST be a hidden field value called "p_action". The
form hidden value is either "OK" or "CANCEL" (case sensitive).
Thus, when the form is submitted, this parameter states to
commit the changes. Useful if you have a "Save" button and
a "Cancel" button.

Summarize Comp Planning Changes Report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for