Supervisor toolkit issue UCCE

Hi All
I am facing a weird issue i have added 4 new agents to an agent team list and 3 of them are showing in the supervisor toolkit and one isnt,
Any Ideas?
Thanks in Advance
Hassan

UCCE & agent desktop's full version details, pls.
Always start off your queries with full version details of components involved. Expedites the resolution.
GP.

Similar Messages

  • UCCE Supervisor login issue

    During CTI OS installation I have choosen Login By Agent ID. I have created a supervisor with Agent ID(Peripheral Number) 131001 and Supervisor Login as user with the same ID 131001. I can login with this ID. But can we use any name instead of 131001 for supervisor login? actually my requirement is for supervisor login, I need to use any active directory user(alphanumeric) which already created and then sync with the supervisor name from ICM configuration manager? is it possbilbe? or I need to re run CTIOS installation and need to check Login By Login Name? Any help will be appriciated.
    Thanks,
    Fakhrul

    Hey David,
    Yup, I have no problems pinging the domain name from the AW server. My AW/HDS/DDS, PG's and Router Logger all running 9.0(2) and are part of the same domain (i.e. the corporate  domain). I have gone as far as checking to make sure that ICM has full read & write access into the ICM facilities OU where ICM is creating new supervisor AD accounts.
    As mentioned earlier, I have also tried to associate existing AD accounts and that fails as well. I have also tried to validate that the new AD accounts created by ICM work and they do, I was able to use one of the accounts to log into a windows PC that belongs to the same domain and I was able to. This tells me that the Account created is fine.
    My thoughts right now are that there is some problem with the authentication method (or) I still have a configuration issue that I have missed or havent figured out yet.
    Sashi

  • Upgrade to MDEX 6.4.0 and RAD toolkit issues

    Hi,
    We are currently evaluating the 6.4 build for use with our web app and are having issues due to it being designed with the RAD toolkit for the 6.1.3 build of MDEX.
    Process.
    Upgrade of MDEX to 6.4
    Update the Reference App (normal not Rad) with the presentation API dll's
    Run Reference app and it works as usual.
    Upgrade current web app with Presentation API dll's and the fun started. (this pointed to needing to Upgrade to RAD Toolkit for 6.4 (RAD 2.1.3)
    Upgrade to RAD toolkit
    Upgrade all references to use the new RAD dll's
    now we get +"Error reading from the connection.The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found."+
    After stepping through the code everything looks good. It points to the MDEX server @ port 16000 (which is exactly what the Reference App uses)
    At that point I decided it might pay to see if the RAD reference app would run.
    Configure iis7 to use the RAD reference app and Run the site.
    Set the input box's to point to our MDEX server and MDEX port and it returned the following error.
    An unexpected error occurred: Error reading from the connection.The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found.
    at Endeca.Navigation.OptiBackendRequest.GetContent() at Endeca.Navigation.OptiBackend.GetNavigation(OptiBackendRequest req) at Endeca.Navigation.HttpENEConnection.Query(ENEQuery neq) at Endeca.Data.Provider.PresentationApi.CommandExecutor.ExecuteCommand(EndecaCommand command)
    Any ideas..
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: 976760 on Jan 30, 2013 1:53 PM

    Hi ,
         I am facing the same issue.I installed the entire setup(mdex version 6.4.0,tools and frame work,platform services,RAD tool kit) and configured a project .The project runs fine in workbench and in the reference jsp application.But i am unable to connect it through the RAD tool kit.I get the same "Error reading from the connection.The remote server returned an error: (404) Not Found." error.
           Any kind of help would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Raghvendra Panda

  • Cisco Agent Desktop / Supervisor Desktop Issue with Full Disk Encryption

    Has anyone had any issues related to running Cisco Agent Desktop or Cisco Supervisor Desktop on a machine running full disk encryption?  Our desktop team installed full disk encryption software from Check Point, and it seams to be causing some issues with call monitoring, screen pops via workflow and connectivity to the UCCX server.  It's not effecting every machine (that we know of), but the fix for us right now is to provide a desktop without the encryption software.  I'm just wondering if this is related to us, or if there is any supporting documentation out there? 
    Any help is apprecicated.

    CAD for IPCCX v4 does not support windows 7. See compatibility matrix:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cust_contact/contact_center/crs/express_compatibility/matrix/crscomtx.pdf
    In my experience if you already have CAD installed and you upgrade the OS (without a fresh rebuild) CAD will work - but it is NOT supported. You should test this though.
    You will not be able to install the older version of CAD on windows 7, the installer will give you errors.
    Brian
    please rate helpful posts

  • Supervisor 750 issue

    Hello, I got issues with my two supervisors they swap the status, any ideas?
    Thanks. 
    Log Buffer (16384 bytes):
    00:01:05: STDBY: curr is 0x0
    00:01:05: STDBY: RP: Currently running ROMMON from S (Gold) region
    00:01:38: %SYS-STDBY-6-CLOCKUPDATE: System clock has been updated from 12:21:05 Tue Jul 8 2014 to 12:21:05 Tue Jul 8 2014, configured from console by console.
    00:01:42: %RMON-STDBY-5-FALLINGTRAP: Falling trap is generated because the value of etherStatsEntry.3.2 has fallen below the falling-threshold value 10
    00:02:02: %NETWORK_RF_API-STDBY-3-FAILDECODEDATADESC: Cannot decode data descriptor for an interface or controller because the sync header cannot be decoded, descriptor type=30
    -Traceback= 40BABEFC 40BAC05C 40BAC364 402A3608 402A18FC 402A23FC 4029EA00 40299B58
    00:02:08: %SYS-STDBY-5-RESTART: System restarted --
    Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software 
    IOS (tm) s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-ENTSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXE4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Fri 07-Oct-05 14:16 by kellmill
     --More-- 00:02:08: %SYS-STDBY-6-BOOTTIME: Time taken to reboot after reload = 50066315 seconds
    00:02:12: %RMON-STDBY-5-RISINGTRAP: Rising trap is generated because the value of etherStatsEntry.6.2 exceeded the rising-threshold value 100000
    16w5d: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-ACTIVE: Initializing as ACTIVE processor
    16w5d: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
    16w5d: %FABRIC-SP-STDBY-5-FABRIC_MODULE_ACTIVE: The Switch Fabric Module in slot 5 became active.
    16w5d: %SPANTREE-SP-2-BLOCK_BPDUGUARD: Received BPDU on port GigabitEthernet9/22 with BPDU Guard enabled. Disabling port.
    16w5d: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: bpduguard error detected on Gi9/22, putting Gi9/22 in err-disable state
    16w5d: %C6KPWR-SP-4-PSOK: power supply 1 turned on.
    16w5d: %C6KPWR-SP-4-PSOK: power supply 2 turned on.
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 1, interfaces are now online
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 2, interfaces are now online
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 3, interfaces are now online
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 4, interfaces are now online
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 7, interfaces are now online
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 9, interfaces are now online
     --More-- 16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 5, interfaces are now online
    16w5d: %PFREDUN-SP-6-ACTIVE: Standby initializing for SSO mode
    16w5d: %SYS-SP-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
    16w5d: %PFINIT-SP-5-CONFIG_SYNC: Sync'ing the startup configuration to the standby Router
    16w5d: %FABRIC-SP-5-CLEAR_BLOCK: Clear block option is off for the fabric in slot 6.
    16w5d: %FABRIC-SP-5-FABRIC_MODULE_BACKUP: The Switch Fabric Module in slot 6 became standby
    16w5d: %DIAG-SP-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 6: Running Minimum Diagnostics...
    16w5d: %DIAG-SP-6-DIAG_OK: Module 6: Passed Online Diagnostics
    16w5d: %OIR-SP-6-INSCARD: Card inserted in slot 6, interfaces are now online
    00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
    Firmware compiled 31-Aug-05 18:19 by integ Build [100]
    00:00:09: %OIR-SP-STDBY-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to route processor
     --More-- 
    00:00:09: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
    00:01:00: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Initializing for SSO mode
    00:01:01: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
    00:01:20: SP-STDBY: SP: Currently running ROMMON from S (Gold) region
    00:01:24: %DIAG-SP-STDBY-6-RUN_MINIMUM: Module 6: Running Minimum Diagnostics...
    00:01:35: %DIAG-SP-STDBY-6-DIAG_OK: Module 6: Passed Online Diagnostics
    00:02:12: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: bpduguard error detected on Gi9/22, putting Gi9/22 in err-disable state
    00:02:18: %SYS-SP-STDBY-5-RESTART: System restarted --
    Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software 
    IOS (tm) s72033_sp Software (s72033_sp-ENTSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(18)SXE4, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Fri 07-Oct-05 16:37 by kellmill
    00:02:18: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Ready for SSO mode
    00:02:19: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure console debugging output.
     --More-- 
    16w5d: %PM-SP-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from bpduguard err-disable state on Gi9/22
    00:03:16: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from bpduguard err-disable state on Gi9/22
    16w5d: %EM-SP-4-SEARCH: The EM function (em_unlock_internal) searched for the specified open event (4445),
    but the search failed.
    16w5d: SP: -Traceback= 40357C48 40357B34 405C987C 405CEB48 405BFFB4
    16w5d: %SPANTREE-SP-2-BLOCK_BPDUGUARD: Received BPDU on port GigabitEthernet9/22 with BPDU Guard enabled. Disabling port.
    16w5d: %PM-SP-4-ERR_DISABLE: bpduguard error detected on Gi9/22, putting Gi9/22 in err-disable state
    00:03:26: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_DISABLE: bpduguard error detected on Gi9/22, putting Gi9/22 in err-disable state
    00:08:26: %PM-SP-STDBY-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from bpduguard err-disable state on Gi9/22
    16w5d: %PM-SP-4-ERR_RECOVER: Attempting to recover from bpduguard err-disable state on Gi9/22

    That's exactly how it works.
    When you promote an agent to be a supervisor, creating a login (the user is created in AD) for WebView, that WebView user has limited views - precisely what you see. Just the team(s) for which they are supervisor and the agents in those teams. I find this WebView log in (the agent peripheral number) to be so limited that I simply don't inform supervisors that it exists.
    Use the User List tool and create another user for each supervisor, using their login name for example, and click the WebView check box only. Now they have complete visibility of Call Types, Skill Groups etc.
    Those are the only two types you have - limited to the team, or global.
    Regards,
    Geoff

  • CTI OS Toolkit issue after patching CTI OS 7.5.8

    Hi all,
    We are setting up the UCCE 7.5.1, and we have patched the system with ICM 7.5.8 and CTI OS
    7.5.8. We have also patched the agents' PC with CTI OS 7.5.8.
    Our developer has actually customized the CTI OS Toolkit softphone, to intergrate it with
    a 3rd party application. It was running fine before patching the agents' PC with CTI OS
    7.5.8. The customized CTI OS Toolkit could start up after the agents' PCs were patched.
    When I tried to uninstalled CTI OS 7.5.8 from the PCs, then it works fine again. What
    could be the problem here? Are there any additional steps that I need to take note after
    patching CTI OS 7.5.8?
    I also noticed that after running the software patch, the CTI OS Softphone would be
    replaced.
    Appreciate any help and advice on this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Eric

    The client patches are meant to be applied to the out of the box software. How is the patch supposed to know how to update your custom software? If you are trying to apply the patch onto a customized desktop then you are overwriting or breaking that customization. Your developer needs to apply the new software release to his custom code and provide a patch for you. The previous release remains backwards compatible so there's no rush.

  • Cisco Catalyst Supervisor communication issue?

    Hey all,
    I had a slight issue regarding two supervisor engines on a Cisco Catalyst 4500 device where the keepalives between the two sups lost communication for roughly 50~ seconds.  This triggered an SNMP alert but it looks like they regained connectivity before a switchover was initiated.  Has anyone ever experienced anything like this before?

    You obviously need to configure the ports etc. but the switch should recognise the module as long as you have an IOS that supports it.
    There is nothing extra to do, you just slot the module in.
    If you are connecting all your distribution switches to the 6500 then if you don't need a vlan/IP subnet in multiple buildings then you should use L3 connections to the 6500.
    Note also that you may want to consider at some time in the future a second supervisor or another chassis as this 6500 with one supervisor is a single point of failure ie. if it goes then there is no communication between buildings.
    Jon

  • G550 Supervisor Password Issue

    I have an issue with G550........manual states a new board is required if you forget the supervisor password. My issue is not forgetting password, but changing it back to "nothing."
    My teenage daughter attempted to bypass my windows admin password by changing supervisor password to Thane13. When she could still not access my system, she gave up. I went to reset the supervisor password to nothing. When prompted for password I typed in the Thane13. When asked for "New Password," I just entered through, setting it back to nothing, I thought. Now, I am locked out of machine!! I've tried everything I can think of, short of a hammer. Any assistance here?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    as tanuj suggested, you need to contact support line. due to forum rules forbid to discuss password issue, i'm going to lock this thread.

  • Supervisor-webview issue

    Dears,
    i have UCCE 7.2.5 environemnt , the customer requested to enable  the supervispor to loging to webview to get report for any thing realting to his team.
    i created supervisor for a team , and enabled to loging to webview page but can't  genrate any reports except reports of agents and team.
    i can't create reports for calltype for example of skill groups,..etc
    note: the user of supervisor is member of the Domain users(UCCE.com/Usrs) ,i atried to add it to any group having permission to webview but useless.
    so any help in this regard is higl appreciated.
    Thanks

    That's exactly how it works.
    When you promote an agent to be a supervisor, creating a login (the user is created in AD) for WebView, that WebView user has limited views - precisely what you see. Just the team(s) for which they are supervisor and the agents in those teams. I find this WebView log in (the agent peripheral number) to be so limited that I simply don't inform supervisors that it exists.
    Use the User List tool and create another user for each supervisor, using their login name for example, and click the WebView check box only. Now they have complete visibility of Call Types, Skill Groups etc.
    Those are the only two types you have - limited to the team, or global.
    Regards,
    Geoff

  • CUIC 8.4 Zero team & supervisor imported from UCCE

    I have CUIC configured with UCCE user integration enabled. Sync was done successful, but it shows zero for both of supervisor/team.
    1. I have data source configured successfully connect to A site of HDS DB: uicm_hds for both of historical/realtime,
    2. I have LDAP configured, and AD user can login to UIC reporting interface, and it will be updated in user list
    3. Login account was system application account
    Also, I noticed that when I run agent, team, or skillgroup report, there was no available agent/team/skillgroup to be selected.
    Can someone assists me please.

    Hi David
    thanks for your response.
    In AWD, I have two agent teams setup with number of agents and three supervisors associated.
    From SQL, I have two DB: uicm_awdb; uicm_hds.
    In uicm_awdb DB, I can see agent teams, agents, and supervisors I created from Agent_Team/Agent_Team_Member/Agent_Team_Supervisor tables,: but there is nothing in same table from uicm_hds DB.
    From SQL, I can see the history report data has been logged into HDS (such as Agent_Interval, Agent_SkillGroup, CallType...). but I can not get any report from CUIC as I do not have items in Available field to be selected for reporting.
    By the way, the CUIC license we are using is Standard.

  • Satellite A100-206 supervisor password issue

    HI
    We have a Satellite A100-206 in the office.
    A colleague trying to protect the laptop has set user password in bios.
    I don't know what exactly she do but at the bootup a password is requested.
    Then she ask me to remove the password so I have typed the password, entred the bios and clear the user password.
    But doing this I 've also note that the supervisor password was already set but not selectable (grey colored) .
    Anyhow I've saved and reboot.
    The problem is that now the O.S. start without asking a password, but I cannot enter the bios anymore because it ask a password and is not the one the collegue remember to have set.
    Why I cannot enter anymore in th bios as user?
    I've also search the hwsetup in windows to re set the user password as indicated in the manual but this software is not present.
    best regards
    Diego

    Thank you for the reply.
    The operating system is windows xp
    I've tried to use hwsetup but i can't find hit in the laptop, reading the manual it should be included in toshiba assist appilcation or locate in the control panel but is not there.
    I have tryied also to download toshiba assit from support site and re install but hwsetup is still not present.
    I can't find the single program "hwsetup" in the list of software downloadable for my laptop , do you know were I can dowload it or in wich software package is included?
    Thanks

  • CUIC Supervisor login issue

    I have a user that is no longer able to login to CUIC with his CCMuser credentials. This is a CCX version 9 system and I verified that he can login to his CUCM page just fine. When I edit the user in CUIC, I don't see a field for a password so I am assuming CUIC will authenticate the user with CUCM.
    The user is a Supervisor and has the reporting rights configured and this the only account that was added to CUIC, in addition to the admin account.
    Any ideas?

    We ended up opening a TAC case. They sent us a file to upload to the UCCX to fix the UCCX Web Services problem. We stopped the Tomcat Service then logged in with root and put the file in the correct directory and then restarted the Tomcat Service.After all services were back working we tested and were able to log in. the other workaround was to upgrade to UCCX 9.0.2(SU2).

  • Voice Monitoring Using Cisco Supervisore Desktop issue.

    Hello all.
    I have a probelm, I prepare for a demo and my demo contain that CUCM7.0+UCCX7.0 with premium license+ Cat2960+ 7911+7940
    When I try to perform a call monitoring from the CSD the message appeare to me and say" The Cisco Supervisore Desktop dont recieve any voice ".
    theis appeare either with SPAN configuration or without it.
    what could the problem be?

    Hello Ahmed,
    One question, what kind of monitoring are you traying to configure, desktop base or SPAN bwese??
    These documents will help you with both configurations:
    Desktop Base
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/custcosw/ps1846/products_tech_note09186a008075025a.shtml
    SPAN base
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_tech_note09186a00801a62a8.shtml
    HTH
    Please rate this post if was helpful
    Walter Solano
    CCVP, Cisco UCCX Specialist
    Cisco IP Communications Express Specialist

  • UCCE CTIOS supervisor not showing the team member

    Hello,all. We have ICM 8.0(2) duplex environment. The CTIOS supervisor toolkit is not showing the most updated team member information. It's still showing the old team member who was removed already and not showing the newly added ones. Do we need to restart the CTIOS server when we change the team assignments? The webview report is showing the correct information though.
    Thanks.

    Hello,
        I have seen this happen before.  lookup how to execure an OPC exit (this will cause a temp outage in your contact center)....  This will resync the team's..
    It should just work normally however
    Chad

  • Stolen Phone Issues

    I am a new customer with Verizon and have encountered a sticky situation. Started my service August 11th and take ownership for going over with my data but on August 18th went to the emergency room and was admitted to the hospital August 19th. During this time my phones were stolen from my home by someone we knew while the phones were in there possession they ran the data up even more. My family tried to resolve the issue by reporting the phones stolen but for whatever reason weren't successful in getting the phones disconnected. But my mother did get the police involved and reported all items stolen by this particular individual.  I was not informed till the night of August 31st on what happen and made a phone call to Verizon first thing Sept 1st. The police were able to retrieve some of my items including the phones in questions. When I called Verizon I was connected to a Tech Service Representative who listen to my explanation and informed me he would write a note including dates phones were stolen, police report number, Officers name, and local law enforcement number. Of course that was not a problem. But the problem in question involved the the enormous amount of data used according to the representative. Chris the representative informed me he would pass all this information to his supervisor to issue all necessary credits but while this problem is being resolved he was going to update my plan to a 100GB plan to protect me from overage while his supervisor makes the necessary adjustment. He assured me do not worry I would not have to pay for the particular price plan, that once the adjustments were made to my account I would be credit back and I will not be responsible for the cost of the plan, My thing I feel like I am being robbed again because the thief stole my phone increased my data even more and I got stuck paying for the there treacherous act. I did receive a credit of $375.00 bringing the remaining balance of $865.80, but to be honest I feel I am still being held accountable partial for the thief activity on my phone line. I am out of the hospital recovering from major surgery and do not have sick pay from my job to fall back on. I am stretching my savings  to cover bills while in recovery. I really want to stick with verizon the reception in my area is awesome and would love to keep my service going but I do not know what else to do how can I get my balance down to a fair amount? Please help me with this matter Thank You

    I am currently involved in a similar situation.  I am writing this on behalf of my mother who is not technology savvy and still uses a flip phone.  Our problem started in January 2013.  An iPhone had been lost on her account which it was suspended online through myverizon.com.  She realized that the phone was once again active when they started getting outrageous over charges on data in August 2013.  Immediately went back on myverizon.com and re-suspended the line and called customer service later that day to explain that the phone was not in her possession, had not been using it and wanted the line cancelled effective immediately.  They explained to her that a phone would re-activate after 3 months automatically.  Since she felt that the error was on her part for not knowing Verizon's operational practices, she paid all the overage charges and forgot about it.  Fast forward 1 YEAR AND 1 MONTH!  She notices a large jump in her bill ($247), she asks me to log into her account to see if I can figure out where the extra charges have come from.  I look at her bill and figured out that the extra charge for $247 was in fact a legitimate charge as my sister ordered a new Galaxy S5 and charged it to the account, had told my dad, but forgot to tell my mom.  BUT, I also discovered that the iPhone that was cancelled 13 MONTHS earlier was STILL BEING BILLED TO HER ACCOUNT FOR $54.80 A MONTH!!!!  I immediately have her call customer service and have her hand the phone to me.  I tell the customer service rep that I have a few questions about her bill.  I explained to her that she never really checks her bill that closely, because she has 4 lines and since they live in the country, Verizon Wireless is their only form of internet service so she doesn't get too alarmed by a variation in her bill if it doesn't exceed $400/month because that is just about average for her services and they occasionally go over their data usage.  I explain to the customer service rep that she has been getting charged $54.80 ($40.00 line access $9.99 insurance $2.00 Verizon surcharges $2.81 tax) a month for a phone line that she doesn't use, doesn't even have possession of the phone and that she CANCELLED the line over a year ago.  She tells me she sympathizes with me, that she also has a hard time understanding Verizon's bill set up and asks me to hold for a few minutes while she investigates the account.  She comes back and tells me that she's very sorry for the inconvenience, but that there is nothing that she can do for me.  I then request to be connected with a supervisor to discuss the issue with.  The customer service rep tells me she will transfer me, but that a supervisor will not be able to do anything about this either. I wait patiently thinking there is NO WAY that a supervisor can not do ANYTHING to satisfy a customer who spends on average $350 a month for the last 20 YEARS.  The supervisor comes on line and once again I explain the situation to her.  She also tell me that she sympathizes with my problem, but that in fact there really is nothing that they can do for my mother who has paid $712 over the last 13 months for a phone line that should have been cancelled.  I tell her that that is completely unacceptable.  She then proceeds to tell me that she "finds it very hard to believe that my mother would not notice an extra charge for 54.80 a month".  YOUR CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE SUPERVISOR IS CALLING MY MOM A LIAR and she's not even trying to be professional about it.  I at this point become very angry as you can imagine and tell the supervisor that I am done speaking with her, that I want to talk to her supervisor.  I was once again placed on hold and transferred to another "supervisor" who tells me there is absolutely nothing that can be done about my mom essentially giving Verizon an extra $712 over the last 13 months for a line that was SUSPENDED (not even active) that should have been cancelled a year prior.  I asked the 2nd supervisor "I have been on the phone with you guys for over an hour now, can you tell me, has the phone yet been cancelled?"  He assured me that it has been cancelled and will not be billed any further.  I finally terminate the phone call because I obviously am not going to get any satisfaction whatsoever.  Now today, I take my dads phone into the Verizon's authorized dealers' store to have his iPhone re-activated after being sent in to Apple for a battery replacement.  I ask the store clerk to please verify that this line has been actually cancelled because I now trust absolutely NOTHING a verizon rep tells me... and guess what?!?  The phone is STILL ONLY SUSPENDED AND NOT CANCELLED!!!!!!!!!! NOT CANCELLED!!!!!! STILL BEING BILLED!!!!!!! AFTER ALL THIS!!!!!! I CAN NOT BELIEVE THIS.  The shear lack of responsibility that Verizon has taken for this enormous error ON THEIR PART has got me completely mind blown.  The fact that she paid $712 over the last year for something that should have been cancelled alone is amazing, but then after spending over an hour on the phone 5 days ago complaining about this and then I find out today that it still hasn't been cancelled after I dispute this with 2 of your "supervisors" has left me completely speechless.  I do not expect to hear anything from verizon on what they could do to make things right for a 20+ year customer, but I just so happen to be on lay-off starting tomorrow, so I have decided to dedicate 2 hours every night posting this story to EVERY public forum and social media site I can find and I know how to use the copy and paste feature!  I am then going to research who I need to contact, be it The Better Business Bureau, FCC and whoever else I can send this complaint to, because not only is this unacceptable, I would think that there would be some legality issue here as well...  

Maybe you are looking for