Surcharge tax code not appear in Remittance Challan(J1INCHLN)

Hi,
Surcharge W/tax code is not being displayed in Remittance Challan(J1INCHLN). While we go to J1INCHLN for Creation of Remittance Challan - Post Outgoing Payment :Header Data(F-07) adjusting with 1 based on Document Number it shows all four values of Base, Surcharge, Education Cess and Higher Edu Cess. After adjusting Total TDS value value and SAVE the document, screen appears Create Remittance Challans. Here it shows Bsse, Education Cess and Higher Edu Cess values with corresponding tax codes except surcharge tax codes and values. As a result Total TDS value which was deducted in J1INCHLN (F-07) screen is not being matched with TDS amount which shows in the screen after saving the record. Why this Surcharge tax code and corresponding value is not being appeard after configuration in J1INSUR ?
Regards,
Anindita

Hi,
1.If you have separate tax codes for Surcharges, J_1IEWT_SURC table
should be maintained, by setting the check box checked, for the company
code. Those tax codes should be available in the J_1IEWTSURC table (use
SM30 to maintain these values)
2.  If you are using separate tax codes for Education cess, those tax
codes should be maintained in the J_1IEWTECESS table and 'X' should be
maintained for the company code in J_1IEWT_ECFLAG table.
3. Make sure that in the table for surcharge you have only the tax types
relevant for surcharge AND DOES NOT CONTAIN TAX TYPES RELEVANT TO
BASIC TAX AND CESS AND
Make sure that in the table for ECESS you have only the tax types
relevant for ECESS AND DOES NOT CONTAIN TAX TYPES RELEVANT TO
BASIC TAX AND SURCHARGE
Warm Regards,
Sadashivan

Similar Messages

  • In Withholding Tax, Amount is not appearing in Remittance Challan

    Hi,
    I have done WHT configuration in Implementation project, This is my 1st Project and I am new in SAP, I am facing following 2 Problems
    1) Remittance Challan is getting prepared.but amount is not showing in the remittance challan, all the process till Certificate is happening smoothly. Please advice, where my settings went wrong or If I missed something in the configuration?
    2) Please also guide or tell me the steps for configuring E-TDS filing.
    Again requesting to kindly provide the solution.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Sunil

    Your Qn. No.1 is answered in the following thread.
    Re: WHT Error while J1INCHLN ?

  • Tax code not appearing in Header data of MIRO

    Dear All,
    I have one query and it is as follows.
    I created one Input tax code A3 in transaction FTXP.
    When I went to transaction MIRO this tax code A3 is not appearing in header data of MIRO.
    Can you pls tell is there any other settings to be done to fullfill the above requirment.
    Thanks in advance
    Babu

    Hi
    Create  a tax code in FTXP
    Then assigen tax code to company code
    Maintain condition records FV11
    Try it out
    Regards,
    Raman

  • While doing invoice verification, for fright value tax code not appearing

    Hi All,
    While doing invoice verification for PO which is having fright conditon, system is not displaying tax code in invoice.
    Every time user has to select manually in the invoive verification.
    Is there is any config missing for that fright condition?
    Thanks in Advance.
    Anil

    Hi
    If you wish to default the tax code for the planned delivery costs this                                         
    must be obtained from an independent source which is OMR2.                                                      
    With OMR2 it is possible to default the tax in the delivery cost                                                
    line + header tax. It is not possible to default only in the delivery                                           
    cost line. The header tax needs to be changed manually to support the                                           
    different tax codes in the item lines.                                                                          
    Best regards
    Erika

  • Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

    Dear Experts,
    I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
    Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
    Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
    Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
    Thanks and Regards
    Mansih

    Hi,
    Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
    During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then  you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • FI-AP Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT

    Sub: A/P Tax Code not considering the excise duty while calcuating the VAT
    Hi Frnds.
    I have a typical problem.
    Till now we are using a "W6" as a tax code, where Excise-10%, Ed Cess-2%, SEd Cess-1% and VAT-4%.
    But as the Govt. rules changed I have created a new tax code "W8" by copying the W6 and modified the VAT to 5% by changing the condition record JVRD.
    The new tax code is not calculating VAT part correctly. It is taxing into consideration Invoice Base value, Ed Cess & SEd Cess (Omiting the Excise Duty).
    I have checked my Tax Procedure, there everything is fine. Even my old tax code "W6" is working correctly.
    Let me know where the error lies.
    Here is the scenario
    00. Tax code                       -   W6   -   W8   - Current Staus of W8
    01. Invoice Base               - 355181 - 351798 - 353324 (by SAP Document Simulation View)
    02. Excise @ 10% on 01.        -  35518 -  35180 -  35332
    03. Ed Cess @ 2% on 01.        -    710 -    704 -    707
    04. SEd Cess @ 1% on 01.       -    355 -    352 -    353
    05. VAT @ 4% on (010203+04)  -  15671 -   0     -  0
    05.    VAT @ 5% on (010203+04)  -    0    -  19401 -  0
    05.     VAT @ 5% on (010304)     -   0     -    0    -  17719
    INVOICE TOTAL VALUE            - 407435 - 407435 - 407435
    Pls. let me know how to come over the issue.
    By the way I am using the above tax code at FB60 transaction code.
    Regards
    Krishna
    Edited by: Gopi Krishna Gutti on Oct 17, 2011 10:18 AM

    Hi Vivek
    Acutually we planned to implement SAP - FI & MM Modules only, and all the configuration is done in the system, but at the final stage our management is not satisfied with MM area, so finally we have gone live with only FI Moudle.
    By the way thankyou for the reply. I have maintained 100% in JMX1 for the new tax code and it is working fine.
    I will give you full points.
    Once again thanks a lot.
    Regards
    Krishna

  • Validation for tax code not to use

    Dear Gurus,
    i had done validation for purchase/sales tax code not use while doing transction.
    Prerequisite
    BKPF-BUKRS =1000
    CHECK
    NOT BESEG-MESKZ IN ZTAXCODE
    Message
    you can't use this tax code
    i had done this validation for parent company code(1000) but it is giving error for our subsidiary company(3000), though the tax procedure is differnet for both the company taxinj(india) and taxusj(usa). Also the end user is making transction in company code 3000 without tax code still system give him error.
    Please advice how to rectify it.
    Regards,
    Rajesh K

    Hi,
    As per my understanding the Tax Code is same but the Tax Procedures are different for the two Company Codes. The solution is to add Company Code 3000 also in the validation Prerequisite. With this it could work.
    Regards,
    Kiron Kumar T.

  • Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code in Txn CNMM

    Hi All,
    We are trying to use PROMAN transaction CNMM from Project systems for converting PR to PO. But when I try to do that I get the following error
    "Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code"
    So it seems that the system is picking the incorrect sales tax code in PO because of which the PR is not converted to PO then. But when I check in transaction CNMM there is no place to input a tax code anywhere. So the system is probably picking it from somewhere, but I am not able to figure out where is it picking it from.
    Does someone have an idea about where the system is picking the tax code?
    Regards,
    V S

    Hi,
    Can you do one thing in your testing server....
    Create purchase requisition manually for that material and with respect to that requisition try to create PO without putting any tax code, and see whether you are able to create PO, keep the same document types at PR and PO level, (it should be the same when you create PO thru CNMM)
    -Saleel

  • Error while creating Remittance challan (J1INCHLN)

    Hello Gurus,
    We are getting an below mentioned error message while creating remittance challan (J1INCHLN) in EWT:
    Runtime error SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC has occurred
    Please help us to resolve the issue.
    Thanks
    Sheetal

    I have one more issue in F-54. While clearing the down payment system is not picking up the whole amount. It shows the difference. For E. g.
    Down Payment Entry
    Vendor      Dr. 10000
    TDS           Cr.          2000
    Bank          Cr.          8000
    While Clearing Down Payment it shows
    Vendor      Dr. 10000
    TDS           Cr.          2000
    Bank          Cr.          4000
    Can you please help me out in this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sheetal

  • Surcharge not posted in remittance challan update

    Hi
    Remittance challan is posted. But in that surcharge only is not posted.
    How to do that?

    Hi
    Please help on this issue as earliest as possible. Its urgent.
    System is picking surcharge also with TDS, Ed.Cess and SHEC but after poting challan, only surcharge is not posted.
    Thanks in advance
    Dhanashree

  • Edcess & Hcess amount not updated in Remittance challan document (Vendor)

    Hi Gurus,
    I am working on ECC 6.0. Should any body tell me how can i get the ed-cess & higher cess amount in remittance challan document? i have got the Basis TDS & surcharge remitted amount on remittance challan but not get the edcess & higher cess remitted amount? also this is not reflected the ed cess & h cess amount in vendor TDS certificate?
    for this i have done the vendor invoice. during this i got the TDS amount by bifurcate. i also maintain seprate GL for TDS Deducion.  then after i create remittance challan. but it couldnot shown me in the line item of ed-cess remitted.
    Please help me to work out on this problem.
    Warm Regards,
    Dhananjay R.

    Hai
    1. If you have separate tax codes for Surcharges, J_1IEWT_SURC table
    should be maintained, by setting the checkbox checked, for the company
    code. Those tax codes should be available the J_1IEWTSURC table
    (use SM30 to maintain these values)
    2. If you have a combined tax code for surcharges, then the tax rates
    should be maintained in J_1IEWT_SURC1 table.
    Make sure that tax codes available in J_1IEWT_SURC1 table are not
    available in J_1IEWTSURC table and vice-versa.
    3. If you are using separate tax codes for Education cess, those tax
    codes should be maintained in the J_1IEWTECESS table and 'X' should be
    maintained for the company code in J_1IEWT_ECFLAG table.
    4. If you are using combined tax codes for Education cess, tax rates
    should be maintained in J_1IEWT_ECESS1 table.
    Make sure that the tax codes available in J_1IEWT_ECESS1 table are not
    maintained in J_1IEWTECESS table and vice-versa.
    Refer (only refer) the solution part of the note 870991 and 853918
    for details relating to table creation.
    Make sure that in the table for surcharge you have only the tax types
    relevant for surcharge AND DOES NOT CONTAIN TAX TYPES RELEVANT TO
    BASIC TAX AND CESS ANDMake sure that in the table for ECESS you have only the tax types
    relevant for ECESS AND DOES NOT CONTAIN TAX TYPES RELEVANT TO
    BASIC TAX AND SURCHARGE
    If you have configured secondary cess seperately,i.e a seperate tax
    type and code for secondary cess,kindly make sure that you have
    applied the steps and the code corrections given in the note 1097621.
    Regards

  • No group not maintained in remittance challan

    Dear All
    Hi
    while preparing remittance challan system has given the error that number group is not maintained co code abc section code id012 and business place 194c.
    plz suggest me what to do?
    Thanks
    Pavan

    Hi,
    Check the menu path as below:
    SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting> Financial Accounting Global Settings > Withholding Tax >Extended Withholding Tax > Postings>India > Remittance Challans > Maintain Number Groups / Assign Number Ranges to Number Groups/ Maintain Number Ranges
    check t.codes also: J1INO / J1INUMBER
    wish you good luck
    regards
    Prasad

  • Treatment of exchange rate difference- company code not appear in the list

    Dear guru,
    I am configuring the treatment of exchange rate difference (SPRO> MM> LIV > Incoming invoice> configure how exchange rate differences are treated). However,the company codes that needed to be configured are not appear in the list. Please note that in the config screen, dont have the option of "New entry", we only set base on the list of existing company codes.
    Also, please be noted that we configured accounts for KDM, PRD in OBYC already
    Appreciate your respond.
    Thanks and best regards,
    Hong

    Hi,
    Check in table "T169P" & "T169V", whether your Co. code exists or not? If not then maintain following config settings.
    SPRO > Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > Incoming Invoice
    > Maintain Default Values for Tax Codes (After maintaining this entry by "New Entries", it will start appearing for following options)
    > Configure How Exchange Rate Differences Are Treated
    > Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
    > Edit PO Supplement Text in Invoice Verification
    > Set Check for Duplicate Invoices

  • Tax details not appearing in the purchase order

    Dear Gurus,
                  Am using tax procedure TAXINN. and i have maintained the respective values for the condition type even though while creating purchase order am trying to click the TAXES button but its not simulating the values that pop up taxes screen is not appearing. but all the CIN settings maintained correctly in J1ID also the values maintained correctly..
    any other setting is required...
    Please advise me..
    Regards
    Anand

    Check tax code is assigned to company code in CIN SPRO settings.

  • Configure Multiple Tax Codes to appear in MIRO

    Hi,
    We have a scenario where a PO was created with a line item which had an incorrect tax code (A1 instead of A0).  It has been posted and GR.  When posting the invoice I would like to correct the tax code for that line item, however I only have the option of A1 or blank.  How can I configure the system to allow more than one tax code to be available for selection at a line item level.
    I have played around with the Tax Tab in MIRO to add A0 there, and that results in the drop down box in the header to display A0, but it is still not available in the line item view.
    Thanks
    Natalie

    Thanks, we have removed the default setting, but that does not change the available options.  Instead it just defaults it to blank, but I still can only select blank or A1.
    The only way that I can get A0 to appear in the header drop down is to add it at the header level Tax tab, where it list all available tax codes. 
    When i go back to the Basic data Tab the drop down contains:
    A1 (Input (10%) Tax Deductible)
    A0
    <blank>
    So it doesn't display the description of tax code A0, so it is like it knows that it shouldn't be there.
    Even though A0 is listed in the header section, I am unable to select it at the line item level.

Maybe you are looking for

  • PReq 1100000000/ not convertible (status )

    while creating RFQ with reference of PR iam getting this error PReq 1100000000/ not convertible (status ) Pls guide...

  • Major heat problem. should i be able to hear the fans?

    my black macbook with 1gb ram is getting very hot when i use front row to play videos at full screen. after about 30-40 mins the left corner of the macbook is so hot i can only touch it for a second or so. then without warning the video just freezes.

  • AP Hold on Invoices

    Our accounting department usually sets up invoices before they are ready to be tied to a PO or they are waiting on another department for approval, there are multiple different reasons. In the prior version of Oracle they were able to enter an invoic

  • How to trigger program into batch job

    Hi We are getting performance issue on below case. We are uploading some data from portal and that is triggering a method of class which is in WebDynpro. This program took all the resources and CPU utilization was 100%. Because of this production sys

  • What is the proper role of OLAP meta-data?

    One basic feature continues to confuse me with regards to the Oracle OLAP option. What is the proper role and/or purpose of creating OLAP meta-data? Since you can now use the Analytic Workspace Manager to create multi-dimensional OLAP objects, doesn'