Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

Dear Experts,
I am looking for configuration where the end user need not enter Tax code during SES. I tried a scenario where I did not maintain any service master and also did not enter any line item in service tab at item level, rather I processed my PO using limits.
Now when I prepare SES using this PO, Tax code is not getting picked up from PO and some tax code(I1) appears. Since I don't want end user to input any tax code I've left it blank.
Finally when I am doing MIRO, i am not able select the desired Tax code(say I8) as it is not available for selection. I get only one Tax code(say I1) available for selection. Even other Tax codes are not available for selection.
Please advise, how do I resolve this, why is the Tax code not getting picked up in SES? and why am I not getting other tax codes for selection in MIRO?
Thanks and Regards
Mansih

Hi,
Tax for service maintained in the service PO in the INVOICE TAB in item details. You are not going to maintain the service tax during SES. In SES you are just recognizing / confirming the vendor performed /completed the required service given to him.
During invoice tax code will flow from service PO to Invoice & you need to just select check box u201Ccalculate taxu201D & remove default tax code in MIRO, if any tax code set for default entry in MIRO. If you want your service tax code should appear in the MIRO screen then just activate in t.code:OBZT (relevant for all transaction),then you can select your service tax code during invoice verification WRT service PO.
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

Condition record of JIVC ( Central Sales tax) is not getting picked up

Dear All,
I have maintained the Central Sales tax condition type as JIVC and assigned a standard Access Seq. JCST.
While creating a condition record, under key combination :
Country/plant region/Region/Taxclassification1 Cust./Taxclassification Matl
I have entered :
Country : IN
Plant region : 06
Region : 13
TaxClassification1 Cust: 1
Taxclassification Matl : 1
For this combination i have set the Condition record as 2 % and the tax classifications ( as above) has been maintained in respective Cust & Matl masters .
The Sales tax code is used as Output Vat ( A0).
The condition JIVC is properly maintained in the Pricing procedure as well as in OVK1, OVK3,OVK4.
Inspite of all this after creating a sales order, the condition JIVC is not appearing in a pricing procedure. Why ?
Kindly throw a light on this.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Pankaj Kalbande
09924090616

Hai
Check ur Plant Region in Plant - Address Fields
and then check ur customer master address field for region.
for this two regions if ur maintaining a condition record, then it will be taken in sales order.
The key combination for the condition type is
Country, Region for deliv. Plant and Region of customer etc...
I think this answer will solve ur problem.
If u feel good give points.
Subramanian Ramasamy.

Custom jars are not getting picked up from in ucm

Hi,
Please let us know the location in ucm installation where we can place db2 jars as well custom jars so that they can be availabe in classpath and can be used. We are trying to place it in /instancename/app/shared location. Please let me know if there is any other location where in which if we place the jars tye will be avaialbe in classpath.
Thanks,
Kesava

Hi,
Actually we have written a custom listener component which will get check in profile attributes and convert each attribute to html tags. In addition to it we are calling db2 database for placing few records into it. Our ucm installed DB is oracle and db2 is not our main database. We are making db2 calls in order to store few things from the content. We installed ucm in linux server. Now in which physical path we need to place our db2 jars and custom code jars so that they will be available to our listener component . As of now we placed them under "wcmldev/app/custom/ampfacfastsearchlistener/lib/" path, where "wcmldev" is our instance name and "ampfacfastsearchlistener" is our custom component. Please suggest us how to overcome this issue. Also please address if in case if we need to develop any other components we can directly go to that place and put jars and make them available in classpath.
Thanks,

IPhone is not getting all photos from iPhoto during sync

One particular album in iPhoto is only showing as having 3 photos in iTunes and only syncs those 3 to the iPhone. The album actually has 9 photos, but I can't get the other 6 to sync up. Any thoughts or experience with this problem?

Got it. I had to export and then drop the photos back in the album. Lost all the notes i had put on them, but at least now they show up in the album in iTuens and synch to the iPhone.

New Condition table / access not getting picked in purchase order.

I have created a new condition table for the tax to be calculated for Site / Material combination. The access sequence is also crated.
When I created the purchase order the condition / tax is not getting picked. When I checked in the analysis, I found that the error was Access not made (initalize field) for the site. The material is being picked up.
Please note that the site is getting picked from KOMK table ( I think it is a header table), while the site is actually there in the line item level in the po.
Request your help at the earliest.
Regards,
Veena.

TCODE OBQ2
Select the tax access sequence. Click on accesses. Tick the right combination required site / article . then click on the fields tab. This will take you to the next screen. There click on the field for which you want to change the selection table and then click on field catalog at the bottom of the screen.
This will take you to the field catalog screen. there select the table and field and then save.
With this procedure you can select the required field into KOMK OR KOMP.
Regards,
Veena.

Files not getting picked from the FTP site

Dear All,
We are having one File-XI-RFC scenario running in XI-PRD Server. Sometimes what happens is that files available in the FTP site are not getting picked by the File adapter. I have checked in the adapter monitoring and communication channel is active there. Also, there are no errors regarding this in SXMB_MONI. I have configured alerts also but for this case no alerts are getting trigerred. And also when I am reactivating that particular communication channel then that file is getting picked instantaneously.
Can anybody please guide me on what might be the real cause for this as this error is happening randomly.
regards,
N.Jain.

HI,
Have you used per File transfer parameter in FTP Communication channel.
It makes the FTP adapter inactive in ideal time.
So add the poll interval may be for every 30 mins or something like it. It will forcefully activate the FTP port after every 30 mins. You may have the poll interval for every 1 min. Only the files to be picked up are getting logged in in XI monitoring.
So there will be no garbage collection of unwanted messages in Monitoring.
Thanks
Swarup

EXW price is not getting picked up during preference determination

HI .. all,
We have transferred Sales order from ECC to GTS. But during prreferrence determination, EXW price of the Sales order is not getting picked up.
Please suggest if any configuration is missing .
Thnks in Advance .

Hi Sapcongts,
Of course you should not modify standard SAP code, and I will not help you to do that.
I don't agree with your idea of proposed and actual EXW values. The Sales Order is your way of recording the customer's Purchase Order, and the price should be fixed at that point. The billing process should not change the agreed price of the goods - only perhaps re-calculate taxes and any other charges that could not be confirmed at the time of order.
If your standard prices are offered as FOB, then I can understand your needing to subtract some components to reach the EXW price, but in that case you will have problems transferring the correct amount to GTS. As I mentioned earlier, you can manipulate the data in the BAdI /SAPSLL/IFEX_SD0A_R3, but I had not looked closely enough at this specific requirement. Unfortunately the pricing table KONV is not provided in the BAdI and that data will not yet be available in the database. Provided the elements to be subtracted are to be read from Master Data, then you could make that same subtraction again in the BAdI. But if there are complex dependencies, it might not be easy.
Having looked in more detail at the code, I think you would be reasonably entitled to complain to SAP about missing functionality here. In the ERP system, the SD pricing provides a specific sub-total (KOMP-PREVA: subtotal 8) for Preference Value, and you can easily configure that to be filled after your subtractions. But that subtotal is not used in the GTS mapping, and I think that's a mistake. You might want to create an OSS message about it, requesting that the GTS Preference value be taken from the sub-total that was clearly designed exactly for that purpose.
In any case, good luck with the project.
Regards,
Dave

Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code in Txn CNMM

Hi All,
We are trying to use PROMAN transaction CNMM from Project systems for converting PR to PO. But when I try to do that I get the following error
"Enter an input tax code, not an output tax code"
So it seems that the system is picking the incorrect sales tax code in PO because of which the PR is not converted to PO then. But when I check in transaction CNMM there is no place to input a tax code anywhere. So the system is probably picking it from somewhere, but I am not able to figure out where is it picking it from.
Does someone have an idea about where the system is picking the tax code?
Regards,
V S

Hi,
Can you do one thing in your testing server....
Create purchase requisition manually for that material and with respect to that requisition try to create PO without putting any tax code, and see whether you are able to create PO, keep the same document types at PR and PO level, (it should be the same when you create PO thru CNMM)
-Saleel

Tax is not getting updated in Sales Order Pricing Conditions

Hi ,
Tax is not getting updated in Condition of sales order when creating Sales order but when we click on update button it is calculating correctly.
Following are the changes for in the standard Pricing:
1) Created ZPSC condition type to calculate the sur-charge from Z-table
2) ZPR0 Condition type to calculate the sum of PR00 and ZPSC
So tax has to be calculated based on the ZPSC value, but it is calculating the tax based on the PR00 base price.
We implemented the logic for updating values of Amount and condition values for ZPSC and ZPR0 by creating custom Routine 904 in Calculation types and assigned the routine in Pricing Procedure.The correct values are coming till NET VALUE 3 but tax is calculating based on the PR00 net price.
I debugged the code for Tax Routine the value for Net value (NETWR) is the base value price but displaying correctly in Net value screen of Conditions tab.
Please suggest how to update the Tax values correctly without manual update.
Thanks ,
Rajesh Sanapala.

Hi Lakshmi,
I am using a TAXINN procedure.....to correct my self can u brief me abt the CIN configuration settings required from SD point of view......how many tax codes have to be maintained for capturing the BED,EDCess,SHED cess,VAT,CST and what are the condition types required for capturing the same.....
I am using JEXQ-A/R BED ......for capturing the BED....and so on ......I feel that i have missed out on some settings ,thats why few conditions are getting captured and some are not.....It would be great if you ca nhelp me on this.
Thanks
Ivy

Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

Hi All
The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
select * from
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
      to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
      t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
UNION ALL
(select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
     to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
    t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
      t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                      tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
      t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
      t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
      t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
      to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
      t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
      t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
      t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
      t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
      s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
from mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
      JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
       mv_sku s
where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
and     t.client_id=s.client_id
and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
and    ( :site is null or t.site_id in (:site))
and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
sho parameter cursor_sharing
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
SQL> sho parameter db_file_multi
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K (1)| 01:09:07 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K (1)| 01:03:10 |
| 20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:37 |
| 23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:45 |
| 29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 6142 | 2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
| 31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M| 2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 | 1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
| Id | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   1 | SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K (1)| 01:08:01 |
|   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 | 7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
|   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
|   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
| 11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
| 12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 | 2328 | 2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
| 14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  | 9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K (1)| 01:02:38 |
| 25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
| 28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
| 29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K (1)| 00:58:47 |
| 31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       | 3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
| 32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 | 3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
| 34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
Thanks
GV

riedelme wrote:
My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
2 from dual connect by level <= 50000;
50000 rows created.
SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select max(c) from t where n =1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2966233522
| Id | Operation          | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 | 1004 | 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|* 2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M| 1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
   2 - filter("N"=1)
14 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select /*+ index (t t_ix) */ max(c) from t where n = 1;
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3231292748
| Id | Operation                    | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 | 1004 | 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|   1 | SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 | 1004 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M| 7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access("N"=1)
15 rows selected.

CUSTOM library not getting picked up

We have our custom business code written in HR_ADMIN.pll and it will be called through CUSTOM.pll for few forms ( like people, Assignment, Element Entry forms)
In Our CLONE instance after every weekend outage for backup, we get error opening people form because of HR_ADMIN.pll not getting picked up. we used to bounce forms port, everything would then work. but since last week bouncing forms port also not working.
I took frd trace, error is exactly at calling hr_admin package. Did anybody got the same error before and have any solution to this ?
Error we get is:
FRM-40735: WHEN-CREATE-RECORD trigger raised unhandled exception ORA-06508.
ORA-01403: no data found
Message was edited by:
user552453

check whether task name is same as session/workflow name. also check any spaces in name. if dac didn't fin corresponding session/workflow it may not create paramater file. if other custom tasks are working from dac this should also work.
Thanks
Jay.

Re : Condition record not getting picked

Hi All,
This is with reference to Inter-company PO.
A condition record has been maintained for MWST condition type(for key combination of Departure country -ID & Destination Country BE).But the system is not picking this condition record but it is picking the condition record maintained for MY to BE.
Could you please tell me where I need to check if a condition record is not getting picked.
Regards,
Mahesh.

Dear Mahesh
- Check your Ship To Party Country
- Ensure that the tax code you have maintained for the combination of ID -- BE
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Serices Material is not getting picked Up in Proforma Invoice

Hi..
While craeting proforma invoice for serices,service material is not getting picked up..
where can be the settings?
Thanks
Manoj

Check if the item category is maintained in copy control from Say Sales Order to Proforma Invoice. T.Code: VTFA. If Item Category not maintained, then maintain it appropriately.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka

Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO

Hello Experts
   I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Ankit

Hello Tej
I have maintained output device but same result.
Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
1.     Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
                                                    (ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
2.     Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
Access Sequence Number = 1
Table = 026
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
Access Sequence Number = 2
Table = 027
Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
Requirement = 103
Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
3.     Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
General Data
Access Sequence = Z515
Access to condition (Checked)
Multiple Issuing (Checked)
Change Output
Program = SAPFM06P
FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Replacement of Text Symbol
Program = SAPMM06E
FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
Default Values
Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
Transmission Medium = External Send
Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
Processing Routines
Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
Program = SAPFM06P
Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
Form = MEDRUCK
Partner Roles
Medium = External Send
Funct = VN
Name = Vendor
4.     Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
Oprat. = 3
CType = ZMAH
Name = Output for Reminder
Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
5.     Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
Step = 101
Cntr = 3
CTyp = ZMAH
Description = Output for Reminder
Requirement = 103
6.     Assign Schema to Purchase Order
Procedure RMBEF1
7.     Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
Out. = ZMAH
Med = 5 (External Send)
Funct = VN
Name = Output for Reminder
Name = Vendor
8.     Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
Purch. Org. = 0001
Vendor = 101281
Partner Funct = VN
Medium = 5 (External Send)
Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
Output Device = LP01
Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
Thanks
Ankit

Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

HI,
When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
Example:
Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
Regards
Sanjay

Hi All,
Thanks for your quick replies.
But it does not solve my problem.
When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
Regards
Sanjay

Tax code not getting picked up from PO during SES

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for