Syntax Check Problem?

Hi there!
I have an ActionScript Project and have many AS Classes on my
source directory, but have only one Application (Main.as).
The question is that I can write anything on the AS Classes
and the Flex doesn't point any errors. Flex only parse the classes
that are used by my Main Application. This is not a good thing,
because not all the classes are laoded by the Main Application
directly, but I still need a instant syntax checking...
So, could some one say me if this is a Syntax Check Problem?
Thank you,
CaioToOn!

Hi,
Indeed, it can be frustrating that your class gets compiled
only when it gets used. I'm guessing the compiler behaves that way
for performance reasons.
But I don't understand the bit about classes not being loaded
by the main application directly? You mean those classes are
compiled into modules / rsls?
As long as the classes are referenced in some class which is
being used by the application, it *should* get compiled. It would
be interesting to know the dependency of your actionscript
classes.

Similar Messages

  • Syntax check of code

    I am passing certain code in table itab and then doing a syntax check using SYNTAX-CHECK FOR itab MESSAGE mess LINE lin WORD wrd .The problem with this method is it check the code line by line and assign mess with the first error msg  but I want to trap all the error message of the code in itab at once in another table.
    Is it possible to trap all the error msg at once in a internal table.

    Hi,
    This is similar to what ABAP Editor sytax check does. You cannot check sytax of the "futher" code as the "closer" code may affect the "further". Unless you correct the first error you cannot therefore check if futher lines are correct. If this worked like you want it would have to correct "closer" errors first by itself, then it could check rest of the code. But how the compilator (generall meaning) would have to know what to place there. This is of course impossible. There is no such compliator doing so in none of known to me programming languages.
    You may skip this by a trick. Looping at the table with a code and checking each line of this with a check syntax. Then collect all these errors within an error table.
    Nevetherless be carefull !! You would have to place excatly one statement per line in code table. Otherwise it won't pass the exam. Moreover you cannot use any of chain statements i.e.
    write: 'first line',
            'second line'.
    ...should be replaced with
    write 'first line'.
    write 'second line'.
    Hope this give you some idea:)
    Regards
    Marcin

  • Syntax Checking in ActionScript files

    I have been using the FlexBuilder 2 trial and I have noticed
    that when editing a actionscript stand alone file I can make as
    many syntax errors as I want and when I save the file it just saves
    it without listing any problems. Is there no syntax checking when
    editing ActionScript files?
    Also does anyone know if flexbuilder 2 can be loaded as a
    plugin into the Eclipse platform? I don't understand why companies
    keep re-inventing the wheel. I think building the plugins for
    Eclipse and maybe Intellij would be a better use of Adobe's time.
    It would allow a developer to use all the features of their
    development environment when developing Flex Applications.

    Yes, FB2 is available as a plug-in to eclipse.
    I think (I'm a FB2 newbie), that the syntax checking happens
    only when saving an mxml file when compile-on-save is turned on. If
    there are AS classes referenced in the mxml file, they will be
    checked.
    This is just my observation, no real knowledge.
    Tracy

  • Doubt in Extended Syntax check

    Hi all ,
                  I am facing a problem when i do a Extended Syntax check for a program . The message i am getting is as follows :
    Messages for CALL FUNCTION interfaces(Todo Prio3)
    Program:  SAPLZC_BWSPI  Include:  LZC_BWSPIF01  Row:    496  [Prio 3]
    No EXCEPTION to set SY_SUBRC Declared for CALL FUNCTION 'FIRST_DAY_IN_TP_GET'
    Thus the value of SY-SUBRC is always 0
    (The message can be hidden with "#EC *)
    can anyone suggest me how to correct it .
    thanks,
    kumaran

    SUPPOSE IF YOU HAVE YOUR CODE AS :
    CALL FUNCTION XYZ
    IMPORTING -
    EXPORTING----
    JUST WRITE
    CALL FUNCTION XYZ                  "#EC *
    IMPORTING -
    EXPORTING----
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    ENDIF.
    THATS ENOUGH.
    OR ELSE TRY.
    CALL FUNCTION XYZ                
    IMPORTING -
    EXPORTING----
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.                       "#EC *
    ENDIF.

  • Syntax check warning

    Hi All,
              I hav a small query . i m working in upgrade and in slin syntax check warning i m getting warning
    i hav a statement like   ULINE AT 0(120).
    Its giving a warning " Syntax check warning
    The static output position "0" must be positive."
    Can anyone plzz guide me regarding this,
    thanking u all.
    regards,
    sahakla

    Hi..,
    in list output..
    the list output length  will be counted in terms of characters.. the default list length is 132 characters..
    maximum no.of characters is 1023..
    the count starts from 1.
    thats it !!
    there is nothing much abt it.
    plz do remember to close the thread when ur problem is solved !! reward all helpful answers !!
    regards,
    sai ramesh

  • No syntax error on syntax check, but syntax error on activation

    Hi all,
    I have a confusing problem.
    I want to default some values on item level of purchase order (ME21N). I added a module call in flow logic of screen 1313 of program SAPLMEGUI. The module itself I added to include LMEVIEWSF01. Here I default some fields of structure MEPO1313. This structure is defined in TOP-include using TABLES.
    Before modification I debugged the transaction and found out, that structure MEPO1313 is accessible during PBO. Changes in debugger are shown as expected on screen.
    Now, syntax check on LMEVIEWSF01 and even on SAPLMEGUI returns no error. But on activation I get syntax error saying MEPO1313 is not know ??
    So, structure MEPO1313 is accessible in debugger, no syntax error on syntax-check, but syntax error on activation ?
    What is going on ??
    Elko

    go to SE80 and Check syantax at package level.
    you might  be checking syantax for other include and problem si somw ehere else, justa  thought.

  • Transport Organizer Syntax Check using the Code Inspector

    dear fellows,
    i'm facing a problem when i check the syntax of transport. When i'm using the option to check the syntax within the transaction se01 the system starts no longer the extended check but the code inspector.
    is there any possibility to turn this code inspector check off and to get the extended syntax check again?
    or on the othe hand, which variant is used for the check and is there any possibility to change the variant that is used?
    thanks for your answers,
    Robert

    Nope... this is SAP standard code so I will reply to the OSS and wait for them to come back to you.
    Regards
    Juan

  • Error Message code 1900 in syntax check and code LV_ERR in user interface

    In my webdynpro component when i did the code inspector check i have an error message in syntax check
    which says "Message code 1900: ObjectType WDYN Object name ZXXXX Row 1 Column 0 the size of the PXA buffer reached a critical value at 158 percent. The maximum size is currently 4,194,304 bytes ==> The size of the PXA buffer reached a critical value at 158 percent. The maximum size is currently 4,194,304 bytes.
    Another Error message in user interface
    which says: "Message Code LV_ERR:ObjectType WDYN Object name ZXXXX Sub-Object Type  Sub-Object Name  Error  Load unit of component is very large (generation limit).==> Error  Load unit of component is very large (generation limit) .
    Please help in resolving these issues.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    you need to discuss with the basis team to increase the abap buffersize.
    there is a parameter in the transaction rz11.
    go to RZ11 and then wirte parameter as abap/buffersize
    check its value.
    if you increase it,   problem will be solved i guess.
    thanks
    sarbjeet

  • SQL Dev 2.1.63.73 Syntax Checking Issue

    Hi I just wanted to point out that the syntax checker routinely marks valid code as invalid (_with a wave red underline_). Sometimes simply adding a space somewhere in the code will make it go away temporarily, but it inevitably comes back.
    Here's some example code that exhibits the issue:
    --Fill in any trailing partial months with default assignments.
    merge into my_calendar dst
    using (select t1.my_sequence
                 , t1.shift_date+t2.rn shift_date
                 , CASE
                     WHEN TO_CHAR(t1.shift_date + t2.rn, 'Dy') IN ('Sat', 'Sun')
                     THEN 'Off'
                     ELSE 'Day'
                   END shift
                 , t1.location_key
                 , 'Generated' assignment
              from (select my_sequence
                         , location_key
                         , max(shift_date) shift_date
                         , TRUNC(trunc(MAX(oc.s_date),'mm') + NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'month'), 'mm')
                           - MAX(shift_date) ddiff
                      from my_calendar
                     group by my_sequence, location_key
                    having max(shift_date) < to_date('1-jul-2010')
                    ) t1
              join (SELECT rownum rn
                      FROM my_calendar
                   ) t2
                 on t2.rn < t1.ddiff) src
       on (src.my_sequence = dst.my_sequence and
           src.shift_date = dst.shift_date)
      when matched then
        update set dst.shift = case when src.assignment != 'Generated' then src.shift else dst.shift end
      when not matched then
        insert (dst.my_sequence, dst.shift_date, dst.shift, dst.location_key)
        values (src.my_sequence, src.shift_date, src.shift, src.location_key);This is a rather extreme example, but nearly the entire SQL code while valid and performing as expected is still marked as having invalid syntax.
    Hopefully this will be resolved in the next version.

    I agree. Do you know of any way to turn it off completely? I think it is causing some performance problems while typing in a worksheet or directly into a procedure/function.

  • CS5 will not compile AS3; no AS3 Syntax Check; no AS3 Auto Format

    I had the trial version of CS5, but it expired. I bought the upgrade and tried to modify a previous Document Class from CS3 in AS3, but the Syntax Check just gives me the error beep, not the happy "ding" with the no errors popup. I try to click the Auto Format and the IDE pops up an error window: "This script contains syntax errors, so it cannot be Auto Formatted. Fix the errors and try again." No errors are in the ouput window (even with either Filter level). Document Classes do nothing even though the compilation runs without any problems; no errors, but no code execution (not even a trace("x");).
    This seems related to the "no code hinting" posts, but I've tried their workarounds, but nothing seems to get my AS3 engine working properly.
    I have removed, reinstalled & rebooted 3 times, the demo version and LWS version (which have different sized install Setup.exe ?!?!), and tried the Adobe update. I also tried using the 4.1.0 flex_sdk, but I've found no solution.
    All the code I am trying in CS5 comes from CS3 and Sytnax Check fine and Auto Formats correctly. AS2 in CS5 functions as expected with Syntax Check and Auto Format working just fine.
    My repeated Web cases through the Support Portal have been denied and they tell me to post it here. I posted to the Flash General forum, but no one had anything to say.
    I'm on Win XP Pro SP3.
    Thanks,
    Dave

    Dave,
    It sounds to me like you may need to find a clean up script after the app is uninstalled. Or you can try just a few bits and pieces or you code to start with in a new file. That's the only thing I can think of besides reformatting to clear your entire registry of Adobe Flash items. I always do a reformat of my entire computer everytime a new version of the Adobe products comes out, saves a bit of headache.
    C

  • Syntax check and auto-format disagree

    Flash 8 Pro: Well, I'm coding along quite nicely and decide
    to auto-format. Auto-format says the code has errors, the syntax
    check says there are none. I can run my code (though it's not doing
    what I want) without getting an error.
    Are there specific scenarios that cause the syntax check and
    auto-format to disagree?
    In just about every other development tool I've used, it will
    auto format regardless of errors, even if the formatting is messed
    up. it's a good aid to highlighting syntax errors! Why can't flash
    do the same?
    Thanks,
    Paul

    Well, after commenting out lots of code until the error went
    away and then removing the comments and making some tweaks, the
    problem has gone away..

  • EAS/AAS Calc Script Editor - Syntax Check

    Hey folks. I've got a very small problem that has been driving me nuts.
    When I validate a calc script, the syntax check always tells me "syntax check was successful" whether the calc is valid or not. I've tried every silly way to get the check to fail but the calc always comes back as valid. (added my name to calc. typed a sentence about what I had for lunch into a calc. nothing works)
    The lack of validation has forced me to write clean calcs on the first try so it hasn't been all that bad.
    Has anyone else seen this? Is there a setting I can change somewhere? I never had this problem at my last job where we were running EAS 7.1.6, but here we are running AAS 9.3.0.1.0 Build 5. Normally I run AAS through Citrix, but I get the same result if I remote directly to the server.
    I appreciate any help you can offer.

    Unfortunately, this version of EAS was very buggy. Lots of validation errors were not trapped. Upgrading to 9.3.1 significantly improved the quality of EAS formula validations.

  • Syntax Check Includes Programmatically

    Hello All,
    I need to implement the logic of checking syntax for the Includes, Exits to be particular, programmatically. Can anyone let me know the approach in doing it.
    regards,
    Mahesh

    Hi,
    My requirement is, i need to develop an utility which will do a syntax check for all kinds of  objects. now i am facing problem with doing syntax check for Exits as they are only Includes. I can do syntax check for the whole of the Function group, but will not serve the purpose because, the error does not necessarily be in the Include ( Exit ) which i am suppose to check.
    Hence i need to have a logic which will do the syntax check for the Exit Independantly.
    regards,
    Mahesh

  • Get ALWAYS result of syntax check of sqlplus possible ?

    When I pass an sql script to sqlplus as parameter then syntax errors may occur.
    It could happen that I type e.g.
    SELECT * from mytable
    without trailing semicolon.
    In this case sqlplus stops processing and waits forever without informing the
    user about the problems.
    Can I force sqlplus to send syntax check and error results in every case back to the user ?

    Until you tell SQL*Plus that you've completed the statement by adding the semicolon, though, it has no idea when to do the syntax check. It has no idea whether you're in the middle of typing in a query that is going to span multiple lines, whether you've stopped typing to talk to someone in the hall, or whether you intended to submit a query but forgot the semicolon.
    Realistically, this is just part of debugging a script.
    Justin

  • Syntax check error in the standard include

    Hi,
    I have modified one standard include using access key to insert one logic as per businness requirements.Now after inserting that code iam getting syntax error but while activating it is not showing the error and getting activated.
    The include is V05XZZMO in that i have inserted code is as follows
    FORM MOVE_USERFIELDS USING ZP.
      CASE ZP.
        WHEN 'VBRK'.
        header
        MOVE LVBRK-XXXXX TO LFAMTV-ZZXXXXX.
    *{   INSERT         GDVK934083                                        1
              MOVE LVBRK-ZUONR TO LFAMTV-ZZZUONR.
    *}   INSERT
        WHEN 'VBRP'.
        item
        MOVE LVBRP-XXXXX TO LFAMTV-ZZXXXXX.
    *{   INSERT         GDVK934083                                        2
       MOVE LVBRP-MATWA TO LFAMTV-ZZMATWA.
    *}   INSERT
      ENDCASE.
    ENDFORM.
    now it is throwing error saying that LFAMTV doesn't exist...when I double click on that it is taking me to the FM RV_INVOICE_VIEW_2 where it is defined....
    Can anyone know the reason why it is throwing the error when we go for the syntax check but when u activate the program it is getting activated.. so can this error can be neglected?
    Any help on this will be appreciated..
    Regards,
    Rohan.

    Hi,
    First comment ur code and then activate the include.
    Now put a break point in the form and then in the debug mode check the structre LFAMTV is visible or not.
    if yes then once again add ur code and then activate the whole program.
    and now once again debug it and see...., whether the values are updated to the strurure LFAMTV.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj

Maybe you are looking for