System shows wrong product version in smsy and SMD Setup Wizard

Hi
We have a SOLMAN EHP1 SPS22 running. The Satellite systems are correctly registered in SLD, also the SOLMAN Fetchjobs is running successfully.
I wanted to run the SMD Setup for a NetWeaver ABAP system, when I click in the Setup Wizard on the System the following link is under Managed Products apears: [NOT DIAGNOSTICS RELEVANT] .
By clicking the link you get the products to be managed, but i only two products are for selection.
SAP ERP 6.0 and SAP FSCM 6.0.
In smys checked the assignment in Systems --> <SID> in the Header Tab I clicked Installed Product version. The List in the Pulldown menu in "Product" are the same as above: SAP ERP 6.0 and SAP FSCM 6.0.
I tried to assign the product manually with no luck. Running the Solman_setup for the Diagnostics did not solve the problem either.
Thanks for your help
Murat

Hi Stuart,
In SolMan, goto t-code SMSY-> Product Definitions-> Select any product.
On the right hand side, click on the button "System Roles"-> Click "Select Product".
Now activate the relevant product as required by clicking on the "Active" checkbox.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Rinkal

Similar Messages

There is already a transaction for the systems of this product version(MOPZ)

Hello All,
I am trying to configure maintenance optimizer in Solution Manager 7.0
on Windows 2003 server and SQL 2005 server.
I am configuring this for SAP CRM 2007 server.
Created the server, database and system in SMSY
Created Logical Component in TA code SMSY
SM59 connection for SAP-OSS is OK.
S-User is assigned to a User.
Created a solution using TA code solution_manager.
Defined the product version for the solution created in the TA code
solution_manager.
When creating a Maintenance Optimizer transaction, I select the
product version and its logical component in the Plan Maintenance
(Phase) and click on Continue to go to Select Files Phase, I get below
warning:
Information Procedure 8000000130 Saved
Warning: Status was reset by system
Warning: There is already a transaction for the systems of this
product version
I cannot get pass this phase.
I have deleted and recreated the solution, carried out the same
activity again but its giving the same Warning
Warning: Status was reset by system
Warning: There is already a transaction for the systems of this
product version
Any help will be appreciated???
Regards,
Satish.

Hello Ragu,
Thanks for your response.
As of now, we do not have ChaRM in place. Secondly, we use a single customer number.
I would like to let you know that in our landscape we have two CRM server, one ECC sever, one SOLMAN7.0 server.
I tried to configure MOPZ for CRM, ECC, SOLMAN server to download the respective STACKS.
I was successful in configuring CRM and SOLMAN.
But when I tried to configure in ECC, it failed due to RFC erros.
So I deleted the transaction for the ECC system and deleted the system itself in Solution Manager.
Reconfigured the Systems in "SMSY", RFC connections are correctly defined to configure MOPZ between SOLMAN7.0 and ECC6.0.
When I start configuring the MOPZ, I cannot get pass the first phase and this is when I get an error: There is already a transaction for the systems of this product version.
Please let me know if you need further information.
Regards,
Satish.

Creating Production Order with wrong production version

Hello Expert,
please provide me answer and solution to resolve our problem regarding creation of production order (CO01 and CO41), because SAP provide and propose production version which have alternative BOM which is status 02 (inactive) already it is not picking the production version which has active alternative bom for our finished material. it is allowing the production to be created even the bom was inactive.
please help us to this it still bugging our system
tenx

Hi Ryan,
Production version will be selected based on the field Selection Method field in Material Matser MRP 4 view.
1 Selection by explosion date
2 Selection by production version
3 Selection only by production version
If the selected field value is 1 , then system selects the version based on the validity dates i.e whichever production version is active on that day that will be considered in MRP.
If the selected field value is 2 by production version. Then system will select the First Prodution version mentioned in the Material Master MRP 4 View (production version Tab).
If the selected field value is 3 always only by production version. Then system will select the First Prodution version mentioned in the Material Master MRP 4 View (production version Tab).
So to address you query I suggest you to delete the production version PV1 with BOM 01 and Make production version PV2 will be available and active in seen as the first production version in teh screen.
Then for your inof purpose you want have the PV1 then re-create it as second version in the Version tab screen.
Regards
radhak mk

Active transaction for the systems of this product version

Hi All,
When i tried to create a new transaction for maintenance optimizer, I received the warning below:
There is already a transaction for the systems of this product version
The solution from note 1296589 does not help.
Transaction code /n/tmwflow/maintenance only show one open session (the current session).
Regards,
KayJay

> When i tried to create a new transaction for maintenance optimizer, I received the warning below:
> There is already a transaction for the systems of this product version
What happens if you click on the button "Maintenance transactions" just next to the "new Maintenance" button?
Markus

Use of different production versions for MRP and costing

Dear PP Gurus ,
We have a scenario in which there are multiple production versions for a particular product .The MRP run as welll as costing run considers only the production version 0001.
We would like the system to consider different production versions for MRP and costing ..that is 0001 for MRP and 0005 for costing .
Is this possible ... if yes ...Kindly suggest the config and master settings for this to happen .
Ram ~

Dear Ramakrishna,
For doing the costing for a specific production version use CK11N,under quantity structure tab key you
can assign the prod.version which is to be used for costing purpose.
While taking MRP if you want to consider the particular Prod.version,assign the demand to the
correct prod.version under schedule line tab in MD61.
Otherwise the system always picksup the first prod.version for MRP.
One more alternative is you have to lock the other prod.versions if you want the system to consider a
particular prod.version.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

SWFs built in versions 10.3, 11.1 and 11.7 are showing up as versions 12, 14 and 20!

SWFs built in versions 10.3, 11.1 and 11.7 are showing up as versions 12, 14 and 20 when checked in a SWF version tool. As a consequence the flash banners I have created are being rejected by the media agency. Can someone pls advise?

i'm not sure about that media agency, but those numbers look about right:
"SWF Version" | "Flash Player Version"
========================================
       9       |          9
      10       |       10, 10.1
      11       |         10.2
      12       |         10.3
      13       |         11.0
      14       |         11.1
      15       |         11.2
      16       |         11.3
      17       |         11.4
      18       |         11.5
      19       |         11.6
      20       |         11.7

My Ipad 'Systems' shows my WiFi connection is working and all my Apps connect and interact ok but Safari says 'No Response from the Server' the same on my Mail. The WiFi works perfectly on everything else in the house. Any ideas ?

My Ipad 'Systems' shows my WiFi connection is working and all my Apps connect and interact ok but Safari says 'No Response from the Server' the same on my Mail. The WiFi works perfectly on everything else in the house. Any ideas ?

it was not just email it was all internet via safari but all apps including the bank account app. the laptop and pc access the same email servers which work perfectly so it is difficult to blame the servers.
by the way it has now started to work properly at lasst after a whole day of trying to resolve this year.

EWA alert report for java system shows wrong data

Hi,
In our solman system, EWA alert reports are configured every week for all the production systems (both ABAP and JAVA). Recently oracle database was upgraded from 10g to 11g in all the production systems. The EWA alert report for ABAP systems is correctly taking the 11g database details and is suggesting parameter changes. Unforunately the EWA alert report for Java systems is still pointing to 10g database and is suggesting the parameter changes for 10g only but the systems are on 11g.
In SMSY, the database of the java systems is maintained as 11g only and not 10g. STill we are not sure where the data is being fetched from.
Please help me in finding the issue.
Regards,
Ragav

Hello,
iNote 1482818 would be iapplicable if not java checks are being made. You are not reporting no java checks, you are reportijng the check is being performed, but has the wrong value. When you updated the database dis you perform Solman_setup, Mnaaged system setup?
The reason I ask s that is what prepares the java side for EWA. For isntance if you had on old version of ST-SER such as 700_2008_2 then it does not know about Oracle 11.2....but that is on the ABAP side, you would need ST-SEr 701_2010_1 to
recognize ORacle 11.2 on the ABAP side.
So while I am not 100% sure in this specific instance, it seems logical that if the Java side isn't recognizing the Oracle Database version ( which means it is making this check) then you may need to run the Solman_setup, Mnaged system setup to pick up the ability to detect a new version of Oracel on the Java side.
It is certainly worth the try.
Regards,
Paul

SCM Product Version in SMSY is lower

Hello All,
After installing SCM 7.0 Server,when I am adding my system in SMSY in solution manager ,only SCM 5.0 and lower versions are available in Product version.Please let me know how can i update the SCM version 7.0 so that it will be available to choose in SMSY.

Hi Gaurav,
This is the issue then. For patch 11, SCM 7.0 does not exist. In order to get the option of SCM 7.0, u need to increase ur SP level. I think u may need to reach up to SP 17 to achieve this.
Rajeev.

Wrong production version picked for planned order in ecc after CIF

Dear experts,
I am new to apo and was working on Cif of transactional data to ecc after planning run in Apo.
we have active integration model and all the master data cifed in apo.
we are cifing ppds ppm which is converted into snp ppm.
The scenario is:
We have a product FG100 at Loc1. For this product we have five alternate PPM's in APO.
When we do SNP planning run, for some planned order it picked alternate 4 or 5 as source of supply. Which is alright.
The problem is when we see the same planned order in ECC it shows source of supply as alternate 1. i.e. planned order in apo with alternate 4 and planned order in ecc with alternate 1.
Is this the expected behaviour, or there is some configuration setting for this. We want that it shows the same source of supply in ecc as in SNP planned order.
Best regards,
AKS

Hi Vikas/Nandkumar,
thanks for the response, in my case the issue is that I have got two production versions in ECC. One production version is used for planning in CTM while the other version should not be considered in APO CTM for planning.
The productionj version which I am not using for planning, I can manually attach the version in ECC to the planned order and the planned order should get CIFed to APO with the source of supply and resource details.
Vikas after executing the report also the source of supply is not getting displayed in the planned order.
Is their a solution by which i can achieve the above results.
Thanks,
Sanjog

How to maintain production version for material and how it will work

Dear Friends,
                      i have created alternative bom for a material , My FG is having two RM1 and RM2. like below,
                FG --->RM1
                FG---->RM2
i created alternative BOM. how it will fetch raw materils from BOM while doing production confimation. what is meant by production version and how to configure that. how it will work
regards
RK

Dear Raja karthik,
1.Production version is a combination of BOM & Routing in Discrete scenario & in REM scenario its a
combination of BOM & Rate routing/Routing.The same can also be created only containing the BOM incase if it is going to be
used for a sub-contracting purchase info record.
2.Production version is a method or technique which's is used to produce a material.
3.A Material may be having one or more than one production version.
4.Production version can be differentiated by using either the validity date or Lot size range.
5.Say For Eg: Prod.Version1 --> Alt BOM1 & Routing1
Prod.Version2---> Alt BOM2 & Routing 1.
6.It has the status Locked and unlock.We can lock it when it is to blocked for any usage purpose.
6.Generally its created using T code MM02,by selecting MRP4 view and clicking on Production version key.
7.It's a master data in REM scenario.
8.Production versions can also be created using T code C223 for more than one material.
9.Planned independent requirements can be created production version specific in MD61.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

I'm having trouble installing Firefox version 6.0.1 The setup wizard is telling me to close Firefox before it can go any further after I've chosen the standard setup. I closed Firefox and clicked the NEXT button again and it tells me the same thing.

I've already tried re-downloading the setup wizard for Firefox 6.0.1 again and re-running it, but I still have the same problem as before.

Flash Player Protected Mode provides a modern, sophisticated set of security protections that we see as critical in today's security landscape.
We highly recommend that users not disable ProtectedMode. Also, it's worth noting that by manually changing your mms.cfg, you have opted out of Protected Mode for all future versions of Flash Player, as we will continue to honor that preference. This puts your system at risk, and that risk will continue to grow over time.
Ultimately, this is an issue with the RealPlayer Browser Record plug-in. There is a more technical explanation in the Mozilla bug referenced above in the thread, but the simplified version is that the security enhancements designed to prevent the introduction of malware via Flash Player make RealPlayer Browser Record plug-in no longer compatible with Flash Player for Firefox. You can disable the record functionality to eliminate this issue, while retaining the ability to view both Flash and Real Player content.
To disable the Real Player Browser Record functionality while maintaining the enhanced security provided by Flash Player with Protected Mode, do the following:
    Launch RealPlayer
    Click the RealPlayer icon in the upper-left corner of the window, and choose Preferences
    Choose Download & Recording from the left-hand menu
    Uncheck "Enable Web Download & Recording for these installed browser"
    Click OK

Two choices for System Selection in SMD Setup Wizard

Hello,
we started to install the SMD. First everything was fine, but now we can select two agents for one system in the setup wizard.
The correct system is green lighted because the setup was successful. The other wrong system is not configurd and so the hole system in the overview is grey.
What did we wrong. Can anyone help us???
Thx
Thorsten

Hi,
Login in to solman smd,
Diagnostics Administration - Landscape Management - Select u'r solution- drill down to the instance & delete(right click).
That should do.

Excise - Balance qty, showing wrong in RG 23 D and in J1iJ

Hi:
We have issue with respect to the Excise records inventory movement. and this started happening for no reason in last month.
The balance of inventory in the Excise records is not getting exhausted as and when invoicing is done.
For example:
If XYZ batch inward through GR is 100KG on 1st Jan
Issue through invoice on 2nd Jan is 10Kg
Ideally the status of this product batch in excise records should be 90Kg
after invoicing on 2nd. This is not happening. The balance is still showing
as 100Kg.
This could create wrong batch selection in invoice for excise and the
excise records is not showing the correct movement. This could create
problems in statutory compliance.
Can someone tell me why this is happening and what needs to be done?
Thanks

Hi Sunil,
Check whether any system upgrade happened before one month.
Also consider these two notes if these are relevant
2017098 - Not able to create Depot outgoing excise invoice using
transaction J1IJ and incorrect tax calculation in J1IG
and
2047135 - Incorrect tax calculation and table updation in
J1IG
Regards
Binoy

ICal shows wrong month in day pane and in edit pane.

I am running iCal 3.0.8 under OS X 10.5.8 on a MacPro Intel machine. In the Month view I suddenly saw the month-day-year of each event appearing in the day panel. I also saw this date in the edit panel for that event. The problem is that the MONTH in this displayed date was wrong. This is June. All of the dates in June said Jan (yes I had my glasses on). I had previously (but not recently) changed the date/time format in International to Custom, so I could show day, time, month, day date, year in the header bar of the screen. I think iCal is reading that format to get the full date but then is not getting it right. I discovered that if I opened International and changed the format spec to US (not US Computer) and then changed it back to Custom, part of the error in iCal disappeared. The date no longer appeared for each event in the day panel of month view. Just the time showed. However, the full date still showed in the Edit panel, and it was still wrong. All the dates say "Jan". If I change to July, the dates are still "Jan" in the Edit panel. They are still "Jan" if I am in Week View, etc.
If I close iCal and then relaunch it, the error re-appears (if the date format in International is Custom), even if iCal was not showing the error in the day pane when I closed iCal.
In sum:
If the date format in International is US and I launch iCal, there is no date in the day pane of month view and the date display in the Edit pane is correct.
If I change the date format in International to my Custom format, there is still no date in the day pane of month view BUT the date display in the Edit pane has the wrong month (Jan, no matter what the real month is).
If the date format is Custom and I relaunch iCal, the date appears in the day pane of month view and is wrong in the Edit panel.
I downloaded the calendar file to my laptop which is running iCal 4.0.4 under OS 10.6.7 and all displays were OK. BUT I had not messed with the date format on the laptop. So that only shows that there was nothing wrong with the calendar file as such. It is possible that if I changed the date format in International the iCal error would disappear and I could get it all OK on the desktop machine if I upgraded to 10.6. But I have a rule that says never upgrade to a new OS unless it is at least a year old. (That's been my unshakeable rule since 1983-4 :-) )
Has anyone else seen this weird iCal problem?

Hi,
You can change this in System Preferences, Language & Text.
Go to System Preferences > Language & Text > Formats tab and change where it says Custom to your location. Then re-open iCal.
Best wishes
John M

System shows wrong product version in smsy and SMD Setup Wizard

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for