Wrong production version picked for planned order in ecc after CIF

Dear experts,
I am new to apo and was working on Cif of transactional data to ecc after planning run in Apo.
we have active integration model and all the master data cifed in apo.
we are cifing ppds ppm which is converted into snp ppm.
The scenario is:
We have a product FG100 at Loc1. For this product we have five alternate PPM's in APO.
When we do SNP planning run, for some planned order it picked alternate 4 or 5 as source of supply. Which is alright.
The problem is when we see the same planned order in ECC it shows source of supply as alternate 1. i.e. planned order in apo with alternate 4 and planned order in ecc with alternate 1.
Is this the expected behaviour, or there is some configuration setting for this. We want that it shows the same source of supply in ecc as in SNP planned order.
Best regards,
AKS

Hi Vikas/Nandkumar,
thanks for the response, in my case the issue is that I have got two production versions in ECC. One production version is used for planning in CTM while the other version should not be considered in APO CTM for planning.
The productionj version which I am not using for planning, I can manually attach the version in ECC to the planned order and the planned order should get CIFed to APO with the source of supply and resource details.
Vikas after executing the report also the source of supply is not getting displayed in the planned order.
Is their a solution by which i can achieve the above results.
Thanks,
Sanjog

Similar Messages

  • Disabling GATP for planned orders/production orders

    Hi,
    We have a scenario where we need to disable ATP check for production orders happening through GATP. That is, ATP check for production order materials should happen in SAP R/3.  This is a problem because we have activated ATP check in integration models for sales orders and it is happening through GATP.  Production Planning is happeninig in R/3 and we dont have either PP/DS or SNP in APO. ..only GATP.
    any pointers on how the ATP check for planned orders/production orders can be blocked in GATP for the same materials which are active for sales order GATP check?
    Thanks.

    hi Pawan /Prasun /vikas
    Thanks for your helpful answers
    @Pawan : Since we have recently gone live with production planning and its in the process of stabilizing we do not want to enable ATP check for production orders in GATP yet. Also since we are also using batch-determination with ATP check in production orders we still have to check how the system responds with the combination.  Therefore,as of now, we dont intend to switch on ATP for production orders in GATP.
    @ Prasun :  I understand there would be a user exit (EXIT_SAPLATPC_001) which would help in doing GATP check based on order type/business event.  However my concern is if the order does not belong to any of the order types will the system do a normal standard ATP check in APO or it will do a ATP check in R3 ? Our programmers are still looking how to tweak it but any pointers based on your experience will be helpful
    Thanks

  • How do I maintain storage location for Planned Orders in APO

    Dear all,
    Can you help us in maintaining storage location for planned orders in APO. The storage location from material master need to be updated in product master of APO and the same shall be automatically picked from product master during Supply Network Planning run.
    Material master CIF is live.
    We have got the following content error in CIF consistency check. How ever this is nt goging to harm any thing, but we would like to maintain in both R/3 and APO.
    Error:
    Plant and storage location in SAP APO: 2004
    Plant and storage location in SAP R/3: 2004 FGPA
    Thanks in advance
    Ram Mohan Rao Kolanupaka

    Instead of maintaining additional master data, i would rather use CCR user exits to switch off comparison of planned order at storage location level if the APO storage location is blank. This way you would not have to make changes to PPMs everytime a new scale out of the solution happens.
    In SE18 check the user exit /SAPAPO/CIF_DELTA3 (interface RELEVANT_FOR_COMPARE_ORDHEAD)
    If it is not possible to switch off this comparison then I guess changing master data is the next step. Do explore with a developer though about the first option.

  • Pick List - Planned Orders in Repetitive Manufacturing

    Hi All,
    Business Process: Cut Planned orders ( No production line, No Routing, No Work Centers). Production done and then these Planned Orders are backflushed.
    Any of you have any idea on how to generate pick list to stage material for these planned orders?
    I know that Production orders can easily be configured to print automatic pick lists but not planned orders. I have been working my heart out to find a solution but couldnot.
    Thanks in advance!
    Siva

    Hi Siva,
    I think action control should work good for your scenario,
    In customizing SPRO->Production->MRP->Planning->Procurement Proposals->Planned orders->Action for Planned orders--->Define action control.
    <b>Define Action Control</b>
    In this workstep, you define the actions that are allowed for the action control function and the sequence in which the system is to carry out the actions. An action can be followed by several other actions and it can also be preceded by several actions.
    <b>Activities</b>
    Define the action control. To do this, define a key and the actions that are allowed and which subsequent actions can follow certain actions.
    <b>Example</b>
    The key 01 is defined. The following actions are to be allowed for this key
    BOME (explode BOM)
    NEMA (check material availability without BOM explosion)
    PRNT (print component list)
    The BOM must always be exploded first. The material availability can only be carried out once the BOM has been exploded. Once the availability check has been carried out, the system should print the component list. The table is then mainatained as follows:
    <b>Control Action Target action</b>
    01  BOME
    01 BOME NEMA
    01 NEMA PRNT
    The action control what is defined needs to be assigned in Material Master MRP4 View under REM section.
    Hope this helps...Reward your points,
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Creation of Reservation for planned order

    Hi Team,
    Is it possible to create reservation for planned orders after MRP run?
    My opinion was the reservation can only be created with reference to production order after MRP. The reservation can not be created with reference to planne dorders after MRP run because planned orders are intermident document which will not exist in the system always. The planned order details will not be available in the system once it get converted into production order.
    How the reservation will be processed which was created with reference to planned order after converting the planned order to production order?
    Kindly need ur guidance.
    Thanks
    psk

    Dear PSK,
    In a typical discrete manufacturing setup production orders are the promised receipt for which reservations gets generated as
    soon a production order is created.But only if the order is released goods movements can be posted against the reservation
    details through MIGO/MB1A for 261 movement.
    It's not required to create any reservation at the planned order level or which may not help you in any means to your business.
    But however in a REM scenario MF60 is used to create stock transfer reservations for 311 movement where planned orders
    are used for production backflush.To explain in detail even without any planned orders you can do a stock transfer reservation
    for a production quantity.
    Check and revert back.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Table For Planned Order Details From PP Module

    In our organisation we are taking Plan Vs Acheivement from Production. So, intialy we taken Plan details from "PLAF" Table and Acheivement details from "S225" Table. But After running MRP at month end. Previous month plan get deleted and new order create.
    how to get history data for Planned order.
    Please help us.
    Regards
    Naga

    I don't think that there is any history in regard to planned orders.  PLAF will get rebuilt according to your MRP parameters and I don't believe that the data is stored.
    Regards,
    Rich Heilman

  • Costing affect with MRP at planned order level and after production order

    Dear all,
    How the costing affect with MRP at planned order level and after production order completion?
    Edited by: Maulik on Jun 24, 2009 1:59 PM

    Dear Maulik,
    check Mr. Vinod's inputs abt costing
    1. Maintain following master data:
    MM01 Material Master with Costing and accounting view. Make sure all the cost Std, Moving avg etc is maintained along with valuation class in Accounting view 1. In costing tab pls make sure "with qty structure" and "Material Origin" are ticked.
    CS01 BOM with components marked with costing relevance in Status/Long Text Tab. Also check all the qty are correct.
    CR01 Work Center in Basic data tab maintain standard value key sau SAP1 and in costing tab maintain the workcenter, activity type and formulas (Usually standard formulas like for Machine Hours SAP006, Labour SAP007, Setup Activity SAP005 is used).
    KL01 Cretae activity types, in basic data tab maintain ATyp Category AS "1" and cost element (as provided by your FI Guy).
    KP26 Activity pricing, here with the combination of Activity type and the cost center you assign price to the activity.
    2. SPRO Activity
    Maintain Costing sheet IMGControllingProd cost controllingProd Cost PlanningBasic settingoverheadsdefine costing sheet.
    OKKN Define costing variant, you define costing type (In the costing type, you define the purpose of a material cost estimate by specifying, for example, which field in the material master record the costing results can be transferred to like std price, moving avg etc), Valuation Variant (defines how the prices are prioratized), date control and transfer structure.
    3. Costing Process Flow:
    1. CK11N CREATE COSTING RUN
    2. CK24 CREATE PRICE UPDATE (You Mark and release the prce to be updated)
    4. COSTING VARIANT WRT PP
    1. OPL1 DEFINE COSTING VARIANT WRT PP
    2. OKK4 or OPN2 DEFINE VALUATION VARIANT
    3. OKK1 or OPM1 DEFINE COSTING TYPE
    4. OPL8 ORDERTYPE DEPENDENT PARAMETER (assign the above creted costing type for both planned and actual)
    Hope this will throw some light on product costing.
    Regards
    kumar

  • ATP Rule for Planned Orders

    Hi Experts,
    I have configured the ATP rule for Planned Orders. So I only want to check the component stock and Production Orders when running ATP check for the Parent Material.
    In OPJJ, I only selected the following options.
    Include Safety Stock : Ticked
    Check without RLT : Ticked
    Incl.production orders : X (Take all production Orders into account)
    No other options or boxes have been selected
    Also I have included the relevant Checking group in MRP 3 for the Parent Material (Checking Rule has been assigned to that Checking Group in Config) and also maintain the Plant Parameters for MRP (assign the checking rule to the plant)
    So, For an example :
    Parent : A
    Components : B and C
    Parent Material A has only 5 Planned Orders starting on same day 20.05.2014 each qty 5
    Components B got stock 300
    Components C got stock 1
    When I ran ATP Check for the Parent material A using COHV, qty 1 has been allocated to all the planned orders as committed. Why is this happening ?
    I also checked in CO09 for the Component Material C, and it says ATP Qty is only 1. I expected the system would allocate that stock 1 to one of the Orders but it seems to be not working as I expect.
    Any explanations will be much appreciated and will not hesitate to avoid the points.
    Kind regards,
    Ishara

    Hi DB49,
    Appreciate your reply. Please see the following comments.
    Right now I have been assuming that you have performed an availability check manually for one of the planned orders, and you got the same results (overconfirmation).  Please confirm.
    Yeah I have performed for one order and it gave me the same result.  Also, when I perform for the 2nd Order, it allocates the quantity.
    OK, basic things you should already have checked:
    You have maintained the checking rule for planned orders (OPPQ or OPPR)
    You have maintained the ATP group for the materials (OVZ2)
    You have assigned the ATP group to the Material Master of the components (MM02)
    You have maintained the scope of check according to the rules you mentioned earlier (OPPJ).
    You have no planning strategy in the component material that would have invoked a special ATP.
    I checked everything apart from point 2 (OVZ2). I have maintained that via MRP Group and that MRP Group has been linked to Master Data (MRP 3)
    Really appreciate your support in this.
    Kind regards,
    Ishara

  • Where we enter raw material reservation qnty for planned order in monthwise

    sir,
    as per client requirement in every month raw material reservation quantity fixed for planned order in monthwise.
    in sap Where we entere raw material reservation   for planned order in month wise nov, dec, jan and whre its show.
    is it possible after mrp run.can we check that raw material reserve stock in mmbe for planned order.
    pl guide me step by step

    Dear Prakash,
    1) in MMBE, you cannot see Reserved qty against plan order ( it is not a confirmed receipt )
    2) the reserved qty which is shown in MMBE is against production order
    3) only after converting plan order to production order ( Header material )
    4) dependent requirements will convert into reservations
    Regards
    kumar

  • Setup time not seen for Planned Orders/ Man Orders in GPB

    Hi all,
    I'm facing an issue where I'm unable to see the Setup activity(green bar) in the Graphical Planning Board for Planned Orders and Manufacturing Orders.
    At first I thought this was only happening for Planned Orders in Released status. However this behavior seems to be erratic with some orders on the same Product showing Setup whereas others are not.
    Any ideas?
    ~Rishi

    Hi,
    I am assuming you are using setup matrix .
    In case of setup matrix system will take setup time from setup matrix.
    If two planned order are created for the same product, system will consider the setup time for the first. For the second it will not show setup time (becasue most probably you have maintained product x to product x - o times).
    Regards
    Amlan

  • User exit/ badi needed for planned order create/change,collective ATP check

    Dear All,
    I'm looking for a user exit/ badi which can be used for planned orders at the stage of
    mass collective availability check (COMAC tcode) update; or at some other relevant stages of mass update of planned orders.
    I need after collective availability check to perform the following:
    1) to copy date from "total comitment" field on header tab of planned order and paste it (replace old date) to order finish date on header screen
    then
    2) to start a scheduling.
    Very appreciate your help.
    Best Regards,
    Andrey
    Edited by: Andrey Kruglov on Apr 15, 2010 3:06 PM
    Edited by: Andrey Kruglov on Apr 15, 2010 3:07 PM

    Dear,
    Use the BAPI : BAPI_PLANNEDORDER_CHANGE
    Or use the function module MD_SET_ACTION_PLAF for Schedule planned order.
    and the transaction MDAC Execute action for planned order
    This function module includes the following actions:
    Explode BOM
    Explode BOM, check availability
    Check availability, only explode BOM in the case of a requirement
    Check availability, do not explode BOM
    Reset availability
    Change planned order data
    Schedule planned order
    Delete planned order
    Assign the key for the respective action control to the materials in the material master (MRP 4 view).
    Please refer this thread,
    Re: MDVP for collective orders
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Version management for Purchase order

    Dear Friends,
    I am implimenting version management for Purchase orders.
    Under version management(IMG) ,set up change dispalys node--
    following fields are available.
    Ex:
    Doc type-- ZCO,NB
    For item view fields:
    Field nameEMATN(material),TableMEPO1211--material field in Item over view
    Field nameMENGE(Quantity),TableMEPO1211
    For Header level fields:
    Field nameZTERM(payment terms field),,TableMEPO1226
    Category--A or B for selection of change documents
    No out put--if i tick it concern field will not included in change doc
    Version--what is the purpose
    Please suggest me
    1) we need enter the all the field names in the item over view and item details and Header level fields as given above ,is it correct.
    2) And with regard to Table, do i enter for Header level fields-EKKO or  MEPO1226 which is available in F1 under techinical information,
    for item level fields,shall i enter table name-EKPO or MEPO1211as dispalyed in the F1 under techinical information.
    3) I need to enter all the fields existing in the purchase order
    4) All these fields and data is to be entered for every document type NB and ZCO.
    5) After changes are made in Purchase order,first time on saving the PO,version is creating automatically,
    second time,if we do changes, version is not creating on saving the purchase order,what configuration needs to be done.
    Please suggest.
    Regards,
    Magana

    Also tell me the use of *Display of change documents in PO*.
    It will display changes made both in item & header.It will help you to audit all changes made in p.o after it is raised.
    In version management not all changes can be ameneded as seperate versions
    only critical changes like price revision,quantity revision.

  • How to connect MAPL and PLPO to derive work center for planned order

    Hi,
    Anybody know how to derive work center using MAPL and PLPO for planned order (PLAF). Is there any connecting table between MAPL and PLPO.
    Please help asap.
    Regards,
    Mitali

    I guess u r trying to view the detail scheduling info (tab in MD13) for a planned order . In that case -
    1. Go to PLAF and enter the planned order number. (PLAF-PLNUM) and get the ID of the capacity requirements record (PLAF-BEDID).
    2. With this PLAF-BEDID go to KBED. pass the value here. KBED-BEDID. The KBED-ARBID values are your work center ID.
    3. To get the work center texts ( the way is appears in the screen) - Pass this value to CRHD . CRHD-OBJTY = 'A' ( i.e Type work center) and CRHD-OBJID = KBED-ARBID.
    Hope it solves ur prob.
    Cheers
    SKC

  • Extractor for Planned order

    Hi Experts,
    I am looking for the stabdard extractor for the Planned order, Basically I need the fields from the table PLAF.
    Please let me know any standard extractor available or any extractor need to enhance.
    Thanks
    sai

    Hi Sai,
    Take a look at 2LIS_04_P_MATNR and see if it is usefull:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/88/7fc73c0c52085be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Else it seems that you should create a generic extractor directly on the table according to this thread:
    Re: Extractors for Planned orders and Proces Orders
    Hope this helps.
    BR
    Stefan

  • No Addon Product Version allowed for transaction

    Hello Gurus,
    we want to update some of our ERP 6.0 Systems. All of it have implemented EHP4.
    But if we check for packages with MOpz, we get the following error:
    No Addon Product Version allowed for transaction: EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01
    SolMan is at version 701 SP24.
    We use the Lanscape Verificartion Tool and it lights green for all systems.
    The following notes for LV are implemented.
    1484609
    1485671
    1501586
    1506251
    1506730
    1510273
    1511818
    1516332
    1517258
    1525078
    1528030
    We have read http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SM/TroubleshootingofMaintenance+Optimizer
    For the systems we chosed ERP 6.0 + EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01 as active product versions
    Has someone a suggestion whats the problem?
    regards
    Chris

    Hi,
    Check SAP 1505281 - No Addon Product Version allowed for transaction: EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01 for your problem.
    Thanks
    Sunny

Maybe you are looking for

  • Taking too much time in Rules(DTP Schedule run)

    Hi, I am Scheduling the DTP which have filters to minimize the load data. when i run the DTP it is taking too much time in the "rules" (i can see the  DTP monitor ststus package by pakage and step by step like "Start routine" "rules" and "End Routine

  • No Synchronisation of Photos between iTunes 10.5 and iPhone 3GS after iOS 5

    I made the Update to iTunes 10.5 on my Notebook with Windows XP and the Update to iOS 5 on my iPhone 3GS. I had a lot of Problems (the Backup had an Error, my outgoing Mails were all deleted in all Mail Accounts, the Synchronisation of Music and Apps

  • Help! Trying to print emails w/PDF attachments via bluetooth from 8300 to HP OfficeJet8470

    Trying to print emails w/PDF attachments via bluetooth from 8300 to HP OfficeJet8470. My boss shopped for and picked this phone based on the store staff.  He wants to be able to have our service tech be able to receive work orders via email, in the f

  • Mass closure of maintenance order

    Hello experts, I need to do mass closure of all open maintenance orders. Is there any way to change the USER STATUS to WOCO (Maintenance work completed) & SYSTEM STATUS TECO (Techically Completed)? Regards Pradipta Sahoo

  • Can't Import Dig Photos from 2 Different Dig cameras

    Frustrating problem with dig camera uploads to iphotos. I have new Nikon D40X. When I connect to Imac with Leopard 10.5, it sees the photos and brings them up as thumbnails. When I say 'import', however, the Imac says the files are ot recognized and