Table of Contnts WP Issue

Hi All,
I have added a "Table of Contnts" webpart in a page with 2 levels.
Issue: Is there any way to modify the url's in this webpart for any particular link?
Please let me know if you have any queries.
Regards,
Kumar.

Hi Kumar,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to modify the links in the Table Of Contents web part.
If I misunderstood please correct me.
How do you want to modify the links in the Table Of Contents web part?
Per my knowledge, the Table Of Contents Web Part automatically generates a site map that points to various parts of the site collection based on the settings and the links in the web part cannot be customized.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Tables belongs to goods issue note

can you plz send me the tables belongs to goods issue note, and how much stock is issued to the customer according to the sales order for a particular period.......
if you dont understand this question <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
thanks in advance
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 28, 2008 12:41 PM

Hi,
What do your find in your table, <b>TNAPR</b> also you can compare the same with other clients. Feel free to revert back.
--Ragu

Exception currencies TCURX table, R3 - BW loading issue

Hello Friends,
I am facing issue in report values for amount in local currency key field. Its value not matching with R3 values. Decimal places are shifted in report.
We are on BI7 (RSDS data source).
There is data coming from R3 into one DSO from different different data sources (Sales, Billing, Purchasing etc) and then getting loaded to cube for reporting.
Few data sources are standard like LIS and few are Z data sources.
This issue must be related to exception currencies maintained in TCURX table. Becauase we are getting issues only for those currencies.
For Ex: See R3 and report value is different.
R3 value:71.230,00 KWD
Cube value:71.230,00 KWD
Report value: 7.123,000 KWD
BW report is showing discrepancy for KWD, CLP (TCURX) currencies for Actual amount in LC key figure.
Can you please explain how to handle fix here?
I have heard that the ECC to BW the respective customization needs to be considered into account in the source system itself.
So can we ask our R3 team to fix this issue for exceptional currencies on R3 side. And any particular information that we will have to share with R3 team to get this corrected?
Please share your inputs on this.
Thank You.

Hi P.K,
We too have faced same issue in last project, we followed some procedure as I attached below.
Please go through the attached document and understand.
Issue description: SAP stores all Amount values of different currencies with a fixed interpretation of having two decimal places. There are few exceptions to this rule for the currencies which has no meaning for the decimal places like 'Chilean Peso', Japanese Yen, South Korean Won, Paraguayan Guarani and many other currencies which we talk in the below sections. For few Currencies the fractions are needs to be stored more than 2 decimals due to the currency values and this document describes the procedures that needs to be followed to have the right reporting.
Analysis provided: Kenya Sales KPI’s values display by multiple of 100.
This document describes the procedure to handle the currencies which has the decimal places other than 2 in the table TCURX.
About TCURX table:
Currencies which do not have two decimal places must be defined in table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes). The table determines the number of decimal places in the output according to the currency key. If the contents of currency exist in table TCURX as currency key CURRKEY, the system sets the number of decimal places according to the entry for the field CURRDEC in TCURX. You can maintain this table via the R/3 Implementation Guide (Global Settings -> Currencies, Transaction OY04).
If a currency is not defined in Table TCURX (decimal places for currency codes), this currency is regarded as currency with two decimal places.
Impact of TCURX in BW on data:
Currently in my present system the following currencies were listed in the TCURX Table:
Details of the Currencies
In the above table some of the Currencies are obsolete.
Data load from Source to BW:
In the Source I have the data like below:
For one of the company the total net Sales is present as 675772,43 CLP (Chilean Peso) in the source system for the period Jan’12.
When the data is loaded into BW:
The data in the Source and in the Cube is matching each other.
Data reported in the query looks like below:
The data in the query gets multiplied by 100 which results in 67577243.00 CLP this is due to the fact that when we execute the query, the query looks at the possible entry of the the currency in the table TCURX. If the entry is available as 0, then it will multiply by 100 as normally as per SAP, all Currencies are stored with two decimal places.
Corrective measures / steps which user should take before raising an issue:
This behavior is due to the fact that the Query always looks at the TCURX table while execution and if there is an entry in TCURX then it will be considered as below:
[Amount Value] * [10 ** (2- (CURRDEC entry in TCURX table))]
In present case as the entry is marked as 0 in TCURX table the result will be like below:
                       = Amount*10**(2-0) = Amount*10**2 = Amount * 100
This will be corrected as below:
All amount related entries at the data source level should be marked to ‘External Format’.
Earlier the same was like below with the internal format.
In 3.x we have the option to choose the same at the infopackage level with 'Currency Conversion for External Systems':
The above change in the data source will provide the below results:
During data loads: When we load the data into BW having amount fields in it, it checks the TCURX table for the currency entry. If the currency entry is present in TCURX table, it divides the amount value by 10** (2- (CURRDEC entry in TCURX table)).
Query Output: The exactly reverse happens while displaying such values in the report output. The amount value will be multiplied by 10** (2- (CURRDEC entry in TCURX table)) while displaying in the report output.
One of below example shows the results as below from the flat file when the format is changed to External.
From Flat file: Sample content from Flat file
In the Cube: Output from the Cube for the same entry
Values are divided by 100 as for Currency IDR the entry is marked as ‘ZERO’ in TCURX table for number    of Decimal places.
In the Query: Out of the Query looks like below:
Values the source value matches with the target value where the values of the cube get multiplied by 100.
Points to be noted: This procedure is only with the amounts having CURR data type.
If the amounts are used as FLTP type then this issue can also be avoided.
All the currencies having entry other than 2 in the field CURRDEC of table TCURX will be affected by this phenomenon.
The division will be carried out at the time of loading while multiplication will be carried out at the time of report output display.
Mainly this needs to be considered when dealing with the Flat file data loads which holds the currencies and for the ECC to BW the respective customization needs to be considered into account in the source system side.
Regards,
Vijay

Table of Contents Style Issue

I am a new user of InDesign 5 and am working with a Table of Contents that was prepared for me in my office. I have updated my text and inserted a few pages into my document and now have some odd formatting showing up in the TOC. I have deleted my text, added it back in, applied different styles and checked to be sure that I don't have any overrides applied. The issue is that the leader (....) seems not to be showing up for about 1/4 of my TOC entries. Any help would be appreciated.
Grainy (sorry) Image below (note items: Filter 4, Import 11, Export 21 as examples)
Thanks!

jclarke2,
You got verify all the styles envolved.
Try first verify this:
For each style included has to be similar like this example. The "entry style" can't be "[Same style]" like on the pic. You have to create one style and verify if don't have any tag besides the leader.
Good luck!

GLPCA table fetch - time out issue

Hi,
I have a situation in which one of my business user is facing a TIME OUT in RCOPCA02 report in the below piece of code.
SELECT (tab_fields) FROM glpca
       CLIENT SPECIFIED
       PACKAGE SIZE packsize
       APPENDING CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE i_glpca
       WHERE rldnr     IN rldnr
         AND rrcty     IN rrcty
         AND rvers     IN rvers
         AND kokrs     IN kokrs
         AND rbukrs    IN bukrs
         AND ryear     IN ryear
         AND rassc     IN rassc
         AND hrkft     IN hrkft                            "note 550972
         AND sbukrs    IN sbukrs                           "note 550972
         AND shoart    IN shoart                           "note 550972
         AND sfarea    IN sfarea                           "note 550972
         AND racct     IN racct
         AND rprctr    IN prctr
         AND sprctr    IN pprctr
         AND poper     IN poper
         AND drcrk     IN drcrk
         AND activ     IN activ
         AND rhoart    IN rhoart
         AND rfarea    IN rfarea
         AND versa     IN versa
         AND eprctr    IN eprctr
         AND afabe     IN afabe
         AND rmvct     IN rmvct
         AND docct     IN docct
         AND docnr     IN docnr
         AND stagr     IN stagr
         AND rtcur     IN rtcur
         AND runit     IN runit
         AND refdocct IN refdocct
         AND refdocnr IN refdocnr
         AND werks     IN werks
         AND rep_matnr IN repmatnr     "RDIP40K020663
         AND rscope    IN rscope       "RDIP40K020663
      AND rclnt     IN rclnt.       "dirty trick to mislead DB-optimizer
    packsize is set to 1000
But when I try to execute the same using the same variant as used by user I am able to get the output in less than 2 mins. The maximum runtime of a program is set as 900 seconds(which I understand is always same across all users). The issue of TIME_OUT is faced by that particular user only.
My SAP system is SAP_APPL46C. Latest support package implemented is SAPK-91404INDMIS.
What can be the issue? Please suggest.
Regards,
Chinmay

You should run ST05 in parallel with both you and the user with the problem and see what the differences are in the plan.
You cannot get a good answer with the data you have provided.
Please see Please Read before Posting in the Performance and Tuning Forum before posting
Rob
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Sep 30, 2011 9:15 AM

Table of Contents webpart issue

Hi Everyone,
I have added a Table of contents webpart to the page(to display all lists, libraries & sub sites) and I have given the desired site url & set "No.of levels to 3". But I am unable to see any list, library or subsites in my webpart.(Also
I am unable to see the checkboxes "Show pages", "Show hidden sites etc.,) Please refer below screenshot
Can any one help me what might be the issue?
Regards,
Kumar.

Hi Kumar,
Table of Contents WebPart display site contents navigation according to navigation. From the screenshot you provided, are you using Managed navigation currently? In my environment, if I use Managed navigation and insert Table of Contents WebPart, the setting
of WebPart displays as yours.
Please go to site settings > Look and Feel > Navigation, switch to Structural Navigation and test the issue again.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Table of Contents formatting issue

Table of Contents will not format properly when I change document margins. The TOC looked great until I had to adjust my left margin to 2inches for printing purposes. Now the page numbers are only a couple of spaces from each header, and it looks really bad. Is there an easy fix, so that I can adjust margins without screwing up the TOC formatting?
Thanks!

Thanks Jerrold,
I have certianly considered this an option if I can't get this resolved before I have to turn in my paper.
I bought Pages to write my thesis, espcially since I have to include a lot of capitoned images. I expected an Apple program to run smoothly and be intuitive, but it has been buggy at times, freezing up, and issues like the wacky TOC formatting from changing the margin size don't make sense.
Thanks again for your time.
RR

Table of Contents font issue

I have been having issue with font display in Table of Contents. Please take a look:
In iBooks Author:
In iBook when previewed, it is partially chopped off!
I can only got the font to display right when scale to a size like 36. There is no option to increase the text box height, moving the text up or down, or move to front does not solve the issue.
What do you think? Thanks!

Thanks for the help. But it does not work. There is no text box (only 2 points on side of text). The text height cannot be changed.
The text alignment is default to be top, but tried centre and bottom does not change anything (seems like there is no text box).

1 record 2 tables. Identity duplication issue

Hi,
I have to add a file info in two different tables: the first one is the dictionary and the second one is used to store the file.
The issue is the IDs set in the second table is not correct. Could you please let me know if you see anything wrong in the following SQL:
-- Insert in the dicctionary
INSERT INTO DB1.[dbo].[FilesDictionary]
(FileRef,
FileDescription)
VALUES (@FileRef,
@FileDescription);
--Get the diccionary ID
SELECT @FileDictionaryID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()
-- Save the file in the second table using the dictionary ID as reference
INSERT INTO DB2.[dbo].[FilesStore]
(FileDictionaryID
,FileAttachment)
SELECT FileDictionaryID
, @FileAttachment
FROM DB1.[dbo].[FilesDictionary]
WHERE FileDictionaryID = @FileDictionaryID
Issue: System is saving the info like this sometimes:
Table:DB1.[dbo].[FilesDictionary]
FileDictionaryID       FileDescription
123                         Test
124                         Test
DB2.[dbo].[FilesStore] -- Files are saved in another DB for storage limitation and the FileDiccionaryID is the link between both DBs
FileDicionaryID        FileAttachment
124                         --file string
<-- this id should have been 123 instead of 124
124                         --file string
Should I use @@identity instead of scope_identity()? Is there any other issue? I think scope_identity() is correct based on the theory but just to be sure.
Thanks for your help

Hi,
Thanks both for your replies. I really appreciate it.
FilesDictionaryID is the primary key in the FilesDictionary table but not in the FilesStore table. So FilesDiccionaryID is always unique in the FilesDictionary table but could be duplicated in the FilesStore table (it shouldn't, based on the previous code).
Those tables are updated by the application which is calling this SP so no one could set this manually.
I am working with SQL Server 2008 so Jn_ds could be right but I am already using the OUTPUT when the variable @FilesDictionaryID is declared so...
It’s hard to test this because I couldn't reproduce the issue but DB data shows this issue is happening…
I am going to investigate about the SQL Server 2008 bug but any suggestion in the meantime is welcome :) Thanks!

Table content vertical alignment issue in Dreamweaver cs4

Hello,
I can't figure this one out. I made a sample file (code below) to debug my problem.
I have a table inside a table. Both have no cell padding or spacing and top alignment, yet, the text appears to the top but there's a gap between the top of the cell and the text. Has anyone had that problem ? Same issue when I place a picture in the table, even if the pictute is 100px X 100px and the table size the same, there still is a gab between the picture and the top of the table ???
Many thanks,
<body>
<table width="500" border="0" cellspacing="0">
<tr>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#00FF00">Test</td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <td valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
      <tr>
        <td valign="top"><p>This text is in a table inside the first table</p>
          <p>Both tables have no cellspacing and no cellpadding yet the text is not entirely aligned to the top of the cell/table !</p></td>
      </tr>
    </table></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>

See this live example of a basic table.
http://alt-web.com/DEMOS/basic-table.html
Content in table cells is effected by heading and paragraph styles.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Weblogic LLR tables RECORDSTR column size issues

Hi ,
We have configured the LLR (Last logging resource to emulate 2 Phase commit XA ) non XA datasouce in our weblogic 10.3.5 domain and I see that weblogic internally creates WL_LLR_<servername> tables in the schema confgured with that LLR datasouce per managed server.
But during some transactions commit we are facing an error stating that RECORDSTR column size (which is default 1000 Bytes) is too small for the COMMIT RECORD. It works fine when we increased the RECORDSTR column to 2000 bytes . But the issue is what is the criteria to increase the column size , our application have a large global transactions and will 2000 bytes will be enough to hold that.
So my question is what actually gets stored within the LLR tables for a transaction , transaction logs or COMMIT record ? , what does COMMIT RECORD actually mean?
Is there a way to specify the table and column length of LLR Tables during creation of LLR data sources itself.

Maybe this can shed some light on things: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/web.1111/e13737/transactions.htm#i1145819

Analyzing tables refresh date DAC issue

Hi all,
I'm new with DAC so probably this is a silly question but I think is how we learn
So I have an execution plan in DAC that without any changes from 8h is taking 12h to run. My last execution was on the 02-Aug and the execution that was ok was on the 26th of July.
After checking the tasks I realized that for one of the workflows the query to the source is now taking 4h instead of the usual 1h.
I've spoken to the DBA's and they told me that the table should be analyzed. I've checked in DAC and the analyze option is checked for that table in tab Task --> Target Tables.
I checked DAC log file for that task and it says it was done with success (log file from 02-Aug), I also checked that table in the database and it seems it was analyzed with in the right date (it says 02-Aug, I used SQL Developer to check this) but in DAC --> Setup --> Physical Data Sources --> Refreshed Dates, for that specific table the value for the Analyze Date is before I've started getting the performance issue (it has 26-July).
Any ideas why this date is not being updated here? Anyway if the database has the right date so the table is being analyzed right? And this is only a DAC refresh problem and the DBA's need to search more to find out what is wrong in the database right?
Thank you,
Carla

As I understand it, the refresh date goes hand in hand with the physical data source for the datawarehouse.
After each batch the refresh_date gets set to the cutoff timestamp of the current run, i.e. it in effect indicates for the destination database what date the data goes up to.
The next batch run will take this date and then only load data after that date.
So if you switch your destination DB but leave your refresh_date untouched then you're going to get incomplete data because so far as the DAC's concerned you've already loaded the data.
I could have misunderstood your question so please don't take this as gospel. But it does sound like you need to manually update the refresh dates and set them to whatever timestamp your desired destination DB was last successfully loaded.
BTW you might want to post future queries in this forum: Business Intelligence Applications

Table view: scroll bar issue

Hi guru's,
I'm having trouble with defining a table view. I'm building a KPI dashboard that should be able to hold the results of many queries. I have one query that will always return a single row. Therefore, I resized the layout of the table view so that it will only display 1 row. However, when deploying the model, I get a vertical scrollbar! The table shows the record from the query and even part of a second (empty) row and I'm able to scroll down even further. I have tried all options, but I can't get rid of the scrollbar.
Does any of you guys have a solution?
Best regards,
Arno

Hi Prachi,
thanks for your reply! You are completely right, regarding the flex compiler. We use that one, because we get errors using the Webdynpro compiler. I'll get basis to look into it, because form view is not an option for us (but that's another topic ).
Best regards,
Arno

Table control scroll bar issue

how to set the scroll bar for table control for the transaction code va42 for billing plan tab.
i have added few custom fileds for the table control, when i m re-arranging the columns for the table control, the scroll bar is fixed for one field( as standard) and the scroll bar starts from that place. how to fix the scroll bar or control the scroll bar and sets it position for the desired column.

HI,
Table control ahs a property called FIXED_COLS. You ave to pass the column number to this property.

If we set cache persistant time in physical table is there any issues we wi

hi all
one small question i have that is ,
with out using event pooling tables,if i set the cache persistent time ,will i face any problem?
any disadvantages will i face ?
Thanks

hi,
set the cache persistent time ,will i face any problem?no problem at all but it is for each any every time .....let say if u set the time as 2minutes but after a year some one has updated the table wanted to see results in a minute then u already setted the parameter to 2 minutes the cache presistent time u need to change manually where as coming ton the event polling no need of that it ll update directly...maintainence purpose event polling is best one
BTW,one link to answer your cache q's
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/search/label/CACHE
Dont forget to close the previous threads
Thanks,
Saichand.v

Table of Contnts WP Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for