Tax calculating checkbox is unselected in MIRO

Hi,
In MIRO with reference to PO , we unfortunately missed to tick calcultate tax indicator and posted .
Now we want to capture the tax for that documnent.
For this please suggest me, how to capture tax for that already posted document through MIRO.
Thanks & regards,
Hari priya,

Hi Priya,
User MR8M for cancelling the invoice, and create another invoice for th same.
some times system will not allow you to cancel invoice thru this transaction code, in that case go to display Invoice MIR4 and there you can cancel.
thru that u can reverse/cancel only Invoice, fi entry u have to reverse manually thru FB08.
Regards,

Similar Messages

MIRO: Changes in tax calculation

Dear Experts,
My requirement is regarding tax calculations (Basic Excise Duty, Edu. cess, Higher Edu. Cess) in MIRO transaction. We calculate all these duties in this transaction with a taxed code which is based on fixed percentages for combination of tax code and condition record. We manually capture and post all these duties in J1IEX transaction based on the given percentages like 12% , 2%, 1%. The requirement is like, in some cases the user will have to capture and post duties in J1IEX transaction not based on the fixed percentages 12%,2%,1%. These duties could be any figures as provided by the dealer/supplier. As these duties are not based on the fixed percentages, we cannot define a combination of tax code and condition record to be used in MIRO transaction. In this case, the tax/duty calculated in MIRO transaction should get matched with figures already posted in J1IEX transaction. Is there any configuration which could do so.
Someone please shade light on this.
Thanks & Regards,
Aniruddha Mahalle

Dear Anirudha,
If the user has entered the excise values manually means ZERO tax code is used in PO, then while entering the details in J1IEX the user has to check the MRP indicator in miscellaneous tab. When the MRP indicator is ticked in J1IEX then when the user enters MIRO on checking the calculate tax code and using the zero tax code(Tax code which is used in PO) the tax values are automatically calculated.
Many threads are already available in SCN.
Role of MRP Indicator regarding Excise Part in GR or in J1IEX
Excise Duty Pass on Scenario
Regards,
Bhanu

Exit or BADI when Tax Calculation in MIRO from Purchase order

Hi Gurus,
I Need a Exit or BADI when Tax Calculation in MIRO from Purchase order.
The problem is the tax is automatically calculated from tax code in PO but I want it to be calculated
from PO condition. Is there any exit available by which I can modify the value of tax when ticking the check box of tax calculation in MIRO.

BADI has method COPY_DRSEG_SELKZ but since there only importing paramters and no exporting or changing parametrs you cannot change the values of rseg here.
Try using proper Implicit enahncement by debugging .
For implicit enhancement check
Re: How do we search enhancement point/section
Edited by: Gautam Totekar on May 29, 2009 5:56 PM

Error in external tax system: Line: 0##### - Unknown tax calculation (MIRO)

Hi Friends,
We have an issue while doing the MIRO
Scenario : - Company code in USD Currency, we have a purchase order in EUR currency which had GR and IR in EUR only last year..this year when we are trying to process IR ( MIRO) for residual amount in EUR currency got the error
"Error in external tax system: Line: 0##### - Unknown tax calculation"
Even when we are trying to post foreign currency invoice from F-43 got the same issue...
Taxware guys said no issues from their side
Is there any year end impact this error ?
Thanks for you help
TKP

Hi Ravi,
I have verified this one also.no issue there
Issue :- When Trying to post Invoices in Foreign currency with Tax I0/A0 ( Exempt tax codes) there we are getting that error
"Error in external tax system: Line: 0 - Unknown tax calculation error
This is process was worked till last year Dec 2011 but not working on FY 2012... the same scenario working in Dev client but not in PRD and Test systems..
The same tax codes can work for local currency postings but not foreign currency ..other tax codes are working for the both currencies in all systems...
Let me share your idea's
Thanks
TKP

With holding tax tab not showing up in MIRO

Hi,
Im trying to do a MIRO for a vendor which requires with holding tax. The setting in done in the vendor master.However while doing MIRO, the with holding tax tab does not show up.
Does anyone know why with holding tax tab is not showing up in MIRO and what needs to be done.
PS: It is set up correctly in the vendor master and it works and shows up while doing FI transactions.
Thanks

Hello Shruti,
Kindly check if on the vendor master, on withholding tax tab, checkbox "liable" has been ticked.
Also kindly check the reconciliation account defined in the vendor master and compared in GL master record, FS00, should have a field status group of G067- Reconciliation Accounts or its equivalent in case you don't use standard SAP field status grouping.
And also check on the MRIO screen, have you checked "calculate tax" under general tab.
Hope it will help you
Thanks
Para

Service tax calculation on unplanned deliver cost

Hi,
While doing MIRO if we are give negative amount in unplanned delivery cost than system calculating service tax on the total value of GRN.
For example MIGO (GRN) has been done for amount 100,000
But while doing MIRO if I put (-20,000) in unplanned delivery cost than system still calculate service tax on 100,000 not (100,000-20,000= 80,000)
We have also implemented two notes 1402621 and 1300860 but problem still the same.
Please advise whether we are missing some configuration or something else.
Regards,
Abhinav Sharma

Hello Vishal,
There is one settings in SPRO - MM - Logistics Invoice verification - Incoming Invoice which asks for the default tax code for unplanned delivery costs.You can put V0 there as zero tax calculation for unplanned delivery costs But am not sure whether it will work if we are posting the unplanned delivery costs in the same line item of material values. Check the same from your side. Now i dont have access to the system and i will check from my end also for the same and get back to u.
Regards
Gregory Mathews

Tax Calculation for Service Process at service entry level

Hi all ,
We have Service process where the tax calculation is Purchase Item level and the Tax calcaulation is happening from there .
and also during MIRO .
system is not able to determine the tax calculation at service entry level , how can we achieve this ?
can some help me on this .
thanks ,
ksr

Hi,
please check additionally the following OSS notes:
495316     Taxes with services
See consulting Note 498878 for information about the functioning of
taxes for service documents.
For service orders, you can set in Customizing (Transaction ML100 or the
following path: -> Materials Management -> External Services Management
-> Taxes at Individual Service Level) whether the taxes are calculated
at individual service level or at item level.
If you set the 'Taxes at individual service level' indicator for a
country, you can maintain tax data (tax indicator MWSKZ and tax
jurisdiction code TXJCD) in a purchase order at service level AND at
item level in Customizing.
The tax calculation only occurs at service level.
Regards,
Edit

Subsequent debit tax calculating wrong

dear guru
while doing subsequent debit for the vendor the Excise duty is calculating wrong
my issue is like this
i have purchase 100 quty with value 10/kg total amount is 1000 for that
ED is calculated 140
Ecess calculated 3
S&H calculated 1
i have done goods receipt and posted invoice also
now i that part of the quantit i have returne
lets 50 kg i have retune for that MIRO,MIGO,JIS,J1iV i have done
next vendor will send the suplimentry invocie because the rate is increase for that 50 quantiy, for that i will do J1IH for the additional excise and i will do MIRO subsequent debit for the rate increse in miro the tax amount is calculating wrong, ie
lets for 50 quantity total amoun increased 100
ed should calculate 14 but it is calculating 28
for that i have to apply any note
pl tell me urgent
thanks
regards
jrp

My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

Tax calculation in Logistic invoice verifica

Certain services have the material component in their price since the material supplied by the vendor. On this material component of total price VAT is applicable whereas on the remaining part of the total service cost, service tax is applicable. We have created the schema for the split calculation of service tax and vat. A tax code is also generated to define the rates of VAT and service tax.
In MIRO, the tax code considers the net price of the service as the base price and calculate VAT and service tax on it, instead of considering the part as applicable to VAt and service tax. It is required to calculate, post the VAT and service tax on their respective partial price component.
Regards.
Milind Dugade
[email protected]

Hello,
tis is right, because you need the different taxes calculated separately, because of financial reason.
The different tax amounts must be booked to difference accounts. If you book it as VAT, you will see the full amount on the VAT account, which you do not want.
I think to get a proper backgrounded answer, you might raise this question in the FI forum.
Best regards
Uwe Neumann

Tax amount difference in Invoice verification (MIRO) and PO

Hi Experts,
I create a PO of say 10000/- and 2% tax so the total po value is 10020/-. It is calculating correctly. But while doing the GR the GR/IR value is less say 8500/- .I don't no the reason it is picking the wrong value.The price control in material master is 'V'. While doing the MIRO the amount is coming 10000 but tax calculation is 25/- instead of 20. What may be the possible reasons for this ? Please help.
Thanks
Arun

Hi Arun
If ur material has Std price in material master accounting view then that price will get updated in GRN instead f the price in PO thru info record.
Check that.
Also is ur tax procedure is TAXINJ or TAXINN.
In MIRO click on simulate and check what is the G/L that causes extra amount and let us know from which we cn help u better.
Reg
Raja

Income tax calculation

Dear All,
Presently In payroll system income tax calculation is based on allowance paid basis. but our client is required that is projected bais. for example
presently if am paying bonus through info type 15 rs 100,000 then system is deducting tax from remaining month in equal installment but client is required that it has to be deducted one time at this month.
please help me
BMS

Dear All,
I read the attached document in sap note i.e.1024284 in this sap note attached document is Guideline.pdf in this document they have clearly mention that ....
Introduction
There may be a need to apply flat tax rate on irregular payments for a particular month. If
they are required to be taxed separately it is not possible to do in the regular payroll run
in the system currently. Currently the system supports TDS at different rate on these
payments through offcycle payroll run. This document explains how this can be achieved
during regular run.
It means if we applied this note then system will deduct flat % on bonus amount if i am wrong please tell me the fact
BMS

Income Tax Calculation problem: Urgent Help Needed

Dear Gurus,
I am facing a unique problem. Our client has two incentives
1) Product Incentive
2) Sales Incentive
Every month incentive figures get changed. These two are Monthly Regular Income (Cumulations Class 24) i.e. included in annual tax calculation.
Now for tax calculation, my client wants "Actual Earning" and "Estimated Earning for the rest of the year" to be different. But Income tax calculation in SAP (for the month of April 2007) takes Actual Earning and multiplied it by 12( i.e. 11+1) to calculate Estimated Earning. But my client wants this Estimated Earning to be different.
Now please let me know is this possible in SAP system and how to calculate this?
Your help will be highly appreciated
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanking You,
With Best Regards,
Pratik

Hi,
I am not understand your problem give your mb then i talk to you
mhpo

Income Tax Calculations 2008

Hi Friends,
I have a Issue in Income Tax calculation,
for the month of September, the form 16 for a particular employee is a follows
Form 16 summary
Gross Salary                   783,399.00
Exemption U/S 10                 5,600.00
Balance                        777,799.00
Empmnt tax (Prof Tax)            1,125.00
Aggrg Deduction                  1,125.00
Incm under Hd Salary           776,674.00
Gross Tot Income               725,513.00
Agg of Chapter VI              106,008.00
Total Income                   619,510.00
Tax on total Income             90,853.00
Tax payable and surcharg        93,579.00
Tax deducted so far             24,100.00
Income Tax                       9,926.00
Now i have added a wage Type called Special pay -Rs.100000 in IT 15, eventhough this amount is reflecting in monthly gross salary and RT table, this amount is not considered for Income tax . I.e with or without Wage type Special pay, The gross salary considred for Income Tax is 783399(without any change). Why it is so.
Rgds,
Sekar.

Hi Sekar,
Make sure that you have assigned the right processing and cumulation classes to your wage type in table V_512W_D
Make sure that in table V_512W_D cumulation class 1 is ticked for this wagetype.
Warm Regards,
Kapil Kaushal

Income Tax Calculations - Issue

Client is saying that as per their existing SAP system, the Income tax calculation is made on Gross salary. And they are saying that if any additional taxable payout is made in a month to an employee, then the total tax on this additional payout should be paid by the employee in the same month. So basically his total tax would be the (general regular monthly tax + total tax on the additional payment), which as per them the system is not calculating correctly since October 2010.

Hi,
Thanks for your reply Jurgen & Remi. I am pretty new to Payroll & this is India Payroll.
Now, the issue is how should I proceed ahead.
1. The client says that the wage types are already configured in the system in such way that on certain wage types, the tax which is calculated is paid in the same month. Can u pls inform that which processing class & cumulation class do I need to check in Table 512w_d for this wage type.
2. As I need to see this whole functioning in Schema, pls guide as to where I should check this whole tax calculation in Schema.
3. The function I have heard which is used is India for Income tax is INTAX.
Looking forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot!!!
Edited by: SAP ST on Nov 25, 2010 7:24 PM

AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy

Tax calculating checkbox is unselected in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for