Tax code genaration,direct debit

Sir,
1.While creating a PO,for line item Tax code should be genarated from Transaction category(Form A,Form C) tax tab.
2.In the profit center distribution rule ther is a check box (DIRECT DEBIT), what this functon does?
Edited by: Darius Heydarian on Mar 26, 2008 5:07 PM.

Mr. Jambulingam,
1.While creating a PO,for line item Tax code should be genarated from Transaction category(Form A,Form C) tax tab.
If you can give me your email address I can send you a document on India Localisation for taxation which might help solvinh your problem.
2.In the profit center distribution rule ther is a check box (DIRECT DEBIT), what this functon does?
This option needs to be selected if you want to debit/credit the profit center directly.
Hoep this helps.
Nagesh

Similar Messages

Error during EA16manual billing ' AH632 - Tax code could not be determined'

Hi,
During manual billing t code EA16, we are getting following error.
'Tax code could not be determined'
Actually there is no tax code given in configuration for the subtransaction which I am using for manual billing. Whether anyone has any clue?
Regards,
Jayant

Hello,
2 reasons
1. Check any where in the Bill/Invoice you have selected tax code <either directly or indirectly>
2.Assuming that Tax code is mandatory, why do not you assign a 0% tax code <either A0 or V0> in EK02?
Hope this helps
Rgds
Rajendra

Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan Sarda

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

Tax Codes in Invoice direct posting

Hi,
I am directly posting Invoice to G/L account and Cost center without referencing PO. The tax code has been automaticaly coming for different combinations of G/L account and Cost centers. Where has this setting being done to get tax codes for various G/L account and cost centers. This is the same case even for different combinations of G/L account and WBS element.
Regards,
Krishna.

Hi Krishna,
I dont think there will separate tax codes for combination of GL account (say cost element) and WBS element..may be for cost centre too...tax code can be done company code specific in LIV...
Thanks

Direct Tax Posting - Not booking document for a particular GL and Tax Code

Hi All,
Earlier I had been facing problem with Directly Tax Posting using BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
With the help of this foruma and specially from Eduardo the problem got resolved after implementing the SAP Note 487064.
However, now I am facing another accute problem which is also related to Direct Tax Posting;
My user wants to post a KR document with direct tax. He wants to mention the tax code as "XX" and corresponding GL Code as 12300. While booking this in SAP using BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST I am getting the below message:
"For tax code XX use GL Account 12345". When I tried creating this document manually in SAP I was successfully able to create the invoice with tax code XX and GL Account 12300.
If I try to create a document with a GL line (and not a tax line) with GL Code 12300 and tax Code XX, the BAPI is successfully able to book the document and I do not get any message.
Could this issue be related to the SAP note? Is there any note released for the SAP Note 487064? I do not have access to SAP notes directly so I am not able to check the notes myself.
Any help in the direction to resove this issue will be helpful.
BR
Sutirtha

Hi Sreejith,
Could you get any clue on this?
Infact, we have also encoutered a similar requirement. Please do let us know if anything worked.
Thanks
Pradeep

Can we set tax amount directly instead of tax code?

Hi,
Is there a way to set the TaxAmount value in an A/R Invoice document line object instead of tax code?
Thanks and Regards,
Sheetal

You may only make it visible.
A workaround would be to create a UDF and use a Formated Search or update it by code. This is not recommended at all because the TAX code and amount is used on many other forms such as VAT Report, Jurnal Entries etc. If you do this make sure to also set the appropriate TAXCODE, and check that the amount is OK with the percentage of the certain TAXCODE.

How to enter invoice with two different tax codes in one line?

Dear friends,
I have this PO for which I enter the invoice.
I recieve later a subsequent debit for this PO from the transporter. This subsequent invoice has got extra debits, one with 21% VAT and one with 19% VAT, which means two items with two different tax codes.
I want to enter this subsequent debit for each item of the PO, and I want to enter both debits in every item of the PO.
How can I enter in one row in MIRO a debit with two different tax codes.
Thank you.

I want in the same line item to enter two tax codes.
Do you Know if there is any way to do this?
It is a subsequent debit and it has two items with two different tax codes. I want to enter the subsequent debit for a PO with many items and enter the value of the whole subsequent invoice. So there is the need to enter one line item with two tax codes.
How can this be done?
Thank you?

Tax code problem

We are using Taxinj tax procedure with different tax codes as per the sale tax like VAT 4 % and VAT 12.5 % ,CST etc.
Now somebody has made the changes in % of sale tax in JIN6 in existing tax code and save it.Then craete the sales order with that tax code(with wrong %) and do the cycle upto Billing.
After knowing all this issue I have made that changes back in that tax code but now systen is not determing the sales tax conditions in pricing procedure.UTXJ condition type is picking the relevant tax code and it also picks the Excise values correctly but not tha sale tax conditions.
In previous open sales orders system is picking the JIN6 but for new orders it is not picking.
What should I do?
Please help me.
Regards

Hi,
Now I have deactivated the JIN6 field and put the original % and save it but still it is not showing the JIN6 percentage in new sales orders.
It is still showing the correct % in old sales orders and even if I am putting the new line item in old sales order it is still working.
There is validity problem I think.What should I do more?
One more clarification I want.
As per SAP notes in TAXINJ we can use VK19 for maintaining the Excise condition % like JMOD ,JECS and J1AX otherwise we need to remove stastical mark from Taxinj then only we can put % for Ecxise in Tax code.
JIN6 and JIN7 we are directly maintaining in FTXP.
If we are maintaining sale tax rate in FTXP we can see that values reflected in VK19 also for JIN6 and JIN7.
Then why we cannot use VK19 in TAXINJ?
I need your help Lakhsmi.
Regards

Error while sending PO (with tax code) from SSP to SUS via MM

Hello Experts
We are implementing Self Service Procurement and Supplier Self Services scenario.
We have created a SC with Tax Code say X in Self Service Procurement. The SC gets created as PO in R/3 (MM) system.
The IDoc which is getting created in the R/3 system has different segments than the one which gets created when we create the PO directly in R/3 system.
This IDoc which is seen in R/3 with the Status 26 - ' Error during syntax check of IDoc (outbound) '.
Please help, we are new to SSP.
Thanx and Regards
Gaurav
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:36 PM
Edited by: Gaurav Giroti on Jan 29, 2009 1:37 PM

note 1311560 to be applied in ebp.

Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item with FM Active

Hi
We have fund management configured for one of the company code, while creating billing document through VF01/VF02 we are getting the Error FF753 Tax code 01 not appear in any G/L account item.
This error however does not appear when posting directly from FI with the same tax code.
I have tried to change the message control in which case i am getting a dump pointing to PSM-FM.
Please advise.
Regards
Sandeep

Hi:
          If you could please refer to the contents of OSS Note 112609 - How are tax codes transferred to conditions ?
"Symptom
If a billing document is transferred to accounting the system displays error messages. Transferring tax codes from tax conditions into the pricing conditions and discounts does not function as expected.
Other terms
FF805, FF747, FF753, MWSKZ, MWSK1, tax code
Reason and Prerequisites
The tax condition in the SD pricing procedure contains incorrect reference steps, there are several tax conditions in the pricing procedure of which the tax codes overwrite each other or a program error exists.
Solution
In the accounting document for a billing document, the different G/L account line items are provided with a tax code. The tax code of the G/L accounts is transferred from the tax condition(s) of the billing document. How are the tax codes of the tax conditions transferred into the other conditions of a billing document ?
Basically:
The conditions of a billing document are read from top to bottom. As soon as an active tax (inactive = ' ') is read, the system transfers the tax code of this tax into the non-tax conditions as follows:
    1. The reference steps (From-step, To-step) are read (the reference steps are defined in the pricing procedure).
    2. The tax code is transferred into all conditions, for which
    the step number of the condition lies in the pricing procedure between "From-step" and "To-step",
    the condition is not inactive (exactly: the inactive flag is not equal to A (Condition exclusion), M (Inactive due to manual entry), or X (Incorrect)),
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition),
    the condition is no tax condition.
After the transfer of the tax code the system searches for the next active tax. If further taxes are found, their tax code is again transferred according to the above procedure. If the reference steps of different taxes overlap, tax codes that have already been transferred are overwritten. To all non-tax conditions which in the pricing procedure stand after the last tax condition the tax code of the last active tax condition is transferred if they are not statistical.
Special features:
    1. If the "From-step" of a tax condition refers to a subtotal of the pricing procedure, the tax code of the tax is not only transferred into the conditions with step number between From-step and To-step but into all non-tax conditions for which
    the step number of the condition in the pricing procedure is lower than the "To-step" of the tax condition.
    the condition is not statistical (if it is no invoice list condition).
    the condition is not a tax condition.
    2. If the "To-step" of the tax condition is smaller than the "From-step", then the system sets "To-step = From-step".
Notes:
    1. As of Release 4.0 the tax code is no longer transferred in pricing but only when the billing document is released to accounting.
    2. If you use several taxes and tax codes and Customizing is incorrect for the release of billing documents to accounting, among others the system may display error message FF747.
    3. If there are several taxes in the pricing procedure refer to Notes 72173 and 82091 for Releases 3.0D - 3.1G. For Release 3.1H, only note 82091 is relevant.
    4. For conditions which are transferred into accounting (thus not statistical, not inactive conditions) and do not contain a tax code, the system searches for a default tax code which in Accounting Customizing can be set depending on the company code (tax code for non-taxable transactions). This applies to releases up to and including Release 4.5B. For Release 4.6, refer to Note 385127."
Regards

The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.

Dear sap guru's
I am facing a problem while doing invoice or while cancelling the invoice or even during Subsequent Credit/Debit
Tax code V0 in procedure is invalid
   Message no. FF704
Diagnosis
   The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.
System Response
Procedure
   Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
   If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
   settings.
   To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
   1. Check whether the required tax procedure has been allocated to the
       company code country. The Procedure field is on the detailed screen.
   2. If you need a new tax code, you can create one yourself.
For this i have checked the assignment of company code and tax code V0 in Tcode (OBCL)
In FTXP the tax code is created in country IN, for the same tax procedure and the tax is a input tax.
please suggest what could be the exact problem
Regards
Sujit

Hi Sujit,
1.Go to FTXP and create tax code V0 for country IN and procedure ZAXINN.
2.In Txn: FV11, For the condition type- XXXX (You will get this in Txn: FTXP, against the tax type, you get the condition type OR in the PO-Item details- Invoice tab, next to field: Tax code, see the Tab-Taxes, click on it and will get the condition type) , maintain the country-IN, Tax code-V0 and the rate.
3.Also things to be checked
1> assign country to company code
2> assign company code to tax code
3> create tax code for country IN
4.Under the following menu path, pls check if you have assigned your tax code to Company Code
IMG>Logistics (General)>Tax on Goods Movement>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition Based Excise Determination>Assign Tax Codes to Company Code
Hope it clears,
Rahul.

Tax Code V0 Country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN

Hi all,
While doing IV in Import Purchase scenario, while simulating, i 'm getting the following error.
Tax Code V0 Country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
Can someone help me on this.
Thanks
AG..

You can define the tax code for your country using the following menupath in customizing:
IMG>Financial Accounting>Financial Accounting Global Settings>Tax on Sales and Purchases>Calculation-->Define tax codes ........... in the next screen enter your country and then the tax code you wish to create and press enter. You would be then directed to another screen, where you would maintain the description and whether it is a Input tax or Output tax and then maintain the appropriate tax percentage and save.
Your country should also be assigned to a calculation procedure. You check the same using the same menupath as mentioned above: .............Tax on Sales and purchases>Basic Settings>Assign country to calculation procedure........In the next screen, enter the appropriate tax procedure for your country. Eg: for country IN, assign tax procedure as TAXIN and save.
Hope this helps.
Regards
SATYA

Error in account determination ( Created a new tax code for CST 2%)

Dear friends,
iam facing a problem while doing vf01.the error is o account detrmination for jn7 which is for condition type CST.
My customer master is also checked
I have maintained the account key and GL a/c for ers,erl,erf,jn6,jn7 etc in tcode vkoa.
I have also mainatined the GL a/c for jn7 in tcode ob40 also.
In ftxp also the rates are maintained.
I have also maintained the condtion record for UTXJ in vk11 tcode.
Now still i dont know if i have missed out some step in customizing or mainatining some record
I have a doubt in ob40. Lets say if i have 2 tax codes s7 & s8 , Do i need to maintain the G/L account for both tax codes?correct na. But in FTXP The G/L account is assigned automatically, inspite of that do i need to maintain ?
Pls clarify, & Wishing u all a colourful HOLI in advance
Thanks in advance
Regards

Dear SD teamsters,
iam facing a problem while doing vf01.the error is account detrmination for jn7 which is for condition type CST.
My customer master is also checked
I have maintained the account key and GL a/c for ers,erl,erf,jn6,jn7 etc in tcode vkoa.
I have also mainatined the GL a/c for jn7 in tcode ob40 also.
In ftxp also the rates are maintained.
I have also maintained the condtion record for UTXJ in vk11 tcode.
Now still i dont know if i have missed out some step in customizing or mainatining some record
I have a doubt in ob40. Lets say if i have 2 tax codes s7 & s8 , Do i need to maintain the G/L account for both tax codes?cBut in FTXP The G/L account is assigned automatically, inspite of that do i need to maintain ?
In OB40 there are two rules displayed, one is taxcode & the other is debit & credit . which do i need to select.
Regards
G.S.Gupta

Wrong Tax Code in Quotation

Hi All,
SAP uses condition type ( MWVS -input tax) as the basis of a calculation procedure- TAXAT, which enables integration between the MM and FI module.
Step 1:
Step      Control     CType     Description   From      To
100     0     BASB     Base Amount                     0     0
110     0     MWAS     Output Tax                    100     0          MWS
120     0     MWVS     Input tax                     100     0          VST
125     0     YWVS     Foreign Input tax     100     0          YST
140     0     MWVN     Non-deduct.Input Tax     100     0          NAV
150     0     MWVZ     Non-deduct.Input Tax     100     0          NVV
200     0     NLXA     Acquisition Tax Cred     100     0          ESA
210     0     NLXV     Acquisition Tax Deb.     100     0          ESE
Step 2:
Condition Record is created for Condition Type -MWVS Input tax based on Country/Tax Code .
Here we have different tax codes maintained for AT country.
Step 3:
Create RFQ(ME41) :
Create Quotation( ME47): Tax code is appearing automatically here.
This tax code is wrong and I would like to know from where does the tax code appear in Quotation .
Thanks In advance
Regards,
Payal Saxena

Hi,
Is the condition MWVS is maintained in both pricing and tax procedures?
For the tax code how you have maintained the condition record?Is it by transaction FTXP / FV11 or by MEK1?
I think you have maintained the condtion by MEK1 for the tax code instead of FTXP / FV11.
Remember it is a tax condition and should be defined in tax procedure.
This condtion record contains the tax code which is getting defaulted to RFQ.
Delete the condition record for MEK1.
Cheers,
Satish Purandare

UDF For Retrieving the Tax Code based on PO

Hi all,
Mine is a file to Idoc scenario.
I wrote a FM to retrieve the Tax Code based on PO .
Created the udf which directly gets the Taxcode from the r/3 with out importing in to the imported objects,is this correct i never tried this before.
Find the UDF for the Same.
final String    CHANNEL_NAME = "GeneratedReceiverChannel_RFC",
     VALNOTFOUND = "VALUE_NOT_FOUND",
     SAPRFCNS = "urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions",
     TAG_FM = "Z_P_INT012_RFC_LOOKUP",
     TAG_TAX_CODE = "T_TAX_CODE",
     TAG_TAX_CODE_P = "TAX_CODE";
AbstractTrace trace = container.getTrace();
          DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
          DocumentBuilder builder = null;
          factory.setNamespaceAware(false);
          factory.setValidating(false);
          try {
               builder = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
          } catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error creating DocumentBuilder - " + e.getMessage());
          Document docReq = null;
          try {
               // Building up RFC Request Document
               docReq = builder.newDocument();
               Node root = docReq.appendChild(docReq.createElementNS(SAPRFCNS, TAG_FM));
               Node nodeTbOpt = root.appendChild(docReq.createElement(TAG_TAX_CODE));
               for (int i = 0; i < pernr.length; i++) {
                    Node nodeTbOptItem = nodeTbOpt.appendChild(docReq.createElement("item"));
                    nodeTbOptItem.appendChild(docReq.createElement(TAG_TAX_CODE_P)).appendChild(docReq.createTextNode(TAX_CODE<i>));
          } catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error while building RFC Request - " + e);
          trace.addInfo("RFC Request XML: " + docReq.toString());
                                                //trace.addWarning("RFC Request XML: " + docReq.toString());
          // Lookup
          Payload load = null;
          try {
               Channel channel = LookupService.getChannel(receiver[0], CHANNEL_NAME);
               RfcAccessor accessor = LookupService.getRfcAccessor(channel);
               InputStream is = new ByteArrayInputStream(docReq.toString().getBytes());
               XmlPayload payload = LookupService.getXmlPayload(is);
               load = accessor.call(payload);
          } catch (LookupException e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error during lookup - " + e);
          // Parsing RFC Response Document
          Document docRsp = null;
          try {
               docRsp = builder.parse(load.getContent());
          } catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Error when parsing RFC Response - " + e.getMessage());
          trace.addInfo("RFC Response XML: " + docRsp.toString());
                                                //trace.addWarning("RFC Response XML: " + docRsp.toString());
          try {
               NodeList res = docRsp.getElementsByTagName("item");
               for(int i=0;i<res.getLength();i++){
                    NodeList itemNodes = res.item(i).getChildNodes();
                    Map itemMap = new HashMap();
                    for(int j=0;j<itemNodes.getLength();j++){
                         itemMap.put(itemNodes.item(j).getNodeName(), itemNodes.item(j).getFirstChild().getNodeValue());
                    rows.add(itemMap);
                                                        catch (Exception e) {
               trace.addWarning("Result value not found in DOM - " + e);
               result.addValue("true");
Error:
16:24:08 Start of test
Source code has syntax error: /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:598: 'class' or 'interface' expected public void TaxValues$(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){ ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:618: 'class' or 'interface' expected } ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:619: 'class' or 'interface' expected ^ 3 errors Source code has syntax error: /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:598: 'class' or 'interface' expected public void TaxValues$(String[] a,String[] b,ResultList result,Container container){ ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:618: 'class' or 'interface' expected } ^ /usr/sap/XD1/DVEBMGS30/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Map283041f0edf311dd960b0003bacd2461/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_INT012_INVOICE_DET_.java:619: 'class' or 'interface' expected ^ 3 errors
16:24:11 End of test.

Hi Potharaju,
Why don't you try this, that really works:
If you are using PI 7.1:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/33/1ec6ced273493a993a80c2301c03da/frameset.htm
If you are using XI 3.0, PI 7.0
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a03e7b02-eea4-2910-089f-8214c6d1b439
Try with these.
Regards,
Juan

Tax code genaration,direct debit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for