TAX Deducted @ Sources

Dear All
As SAP provides the standard withholding tax solution on incomming payments. but my problem is that at the time of incomming payment i can't post the withholding tax amount becuase my customer don't provide me the payment detail (Remittance advice). please suggest me what can be the process and how i can post the withholding tax deducted by customers.
my country is pakistan and currently, no country specific solution is available for withholding tax.
Thanx

Thanx Madhav
i am already using EWT functionality.
Withholding tax is being deducted at the time of payment, its my company legal requriment. so tax should be deducted on imcomming payments in customer cases and it is working fine if i post the withheld amount at the time of incomming payments through f-28 e.g.
but the problem is that my customer are not paying to my company invoice to invoice and never provides the detail of payment. so i can't post the tax at the time of payment receiving. After some period customer sends to my company tax challans then my company wants to post the withholding tax amount.
Edited by: Farhan Rashad on Apr 27, 2009 4:20 PM

Similar Messages

  • Tax Deduction at Source Upgrade Utility

    Dear All,
    Has anyone used The Tax Deduction at Source Upgrade Utility which offers customers in India the ability to upgrade the with-holding tax data created by TDS add-on to SAP Business One 8.8
    I tried executing the utility, but gives an error "Unable to read Excel File". Is it mandatory to fill up all 29 sheets in the excel template provided or we can upload each sheet separately?
    Kindly assist.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Pritesh Shah

    Dear,
    Check the below link
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/index?rid=/library/uuid/108fc2b8-fc8e-2c10-cd84-ae04ee061e24
    and check the manual of using TDS utility.
    Hope this will help you.
    Thanks,
    Neetu

  • Income tax deduction

    Hi,
    We are facing the following issue:
    When employee is locked say in the month of November and then in the
    month of december when the locked is release and the payroll is
    processed normally, the net tax payable by the employee is deducted
    fully and does not get pro-rated.
    For eg: if the net tax payable by the employee is 16043, then when the
    payroll is processed in the month of December, the income tax should be
    16043/4=4010.75, but it is deducting the full 16043 as income tax.
    cheers,
    Ayyaps

    Hi,
    In your thread you have mentioned that the payroll was blocked for the month of Nov and was run on Dec which triggered Retro run.
    Kindly note that if the payroll was blocked for Feb and was run in Mar then the tax effect will be the same as you mentioned.
    Also please mention the values of below wage types for the month of November and December
    /450 Tax payable and surcharge
    /456 Tax deducted so far
    /458 Net tax payable
    /460 Income Tax
    Thanks and Regards
    Kiran

  • Income Tax deducted for withdrawn employee

    Hi Experts
    In my Client One employee is withdrawn on 31.04.2011n he got final settelement in that month,But in the june payroll for that employee income tax deducted,we have cheked all his prevoius payroll cluster but not able to get the solution.Can anyone tell why this happend
    regards
    Aakash

    Aakash,
    Once employee moves to employement status zero, payroll will only be executed if there is some master data change. Without that it is not possible. So just check if system ws triggering some retro for this test case. Also you can check IT0003 'Earliest MD change' for the reason. Alongwith it even if the user has deleted the record, you can still do the simulation run and check the results for the employee. from result you can easily track if there was any chnage.
    Edited by: Praveen Tiwari on Jun 24, 2011 7:30 PM

  • Info type and subtype to stop income tax deduction for a month

    can i know how to stop income tax deduction for a month for a specific employee. I understand that this s possible

    Hi
    You can use additional wage type (infotype 0015)
    and subtype voluntary tax std is MVT1 as per SAP
    if you maintain 0.01 value here and indicating the month
    SAP calculated income tax is supressed and this is how u can stip income tax deduction for a month
    with regards
    partha
    keep sharing and learning

  • Vendor - Tax deduction at lower rate - MIRO & FB60

    Hi all,
    Currently we are having one issue of u201CTax deduction at lower rateu201D for a Vendor who is having such certificate with him.
    For amount purpose we have set the SPRO setting but the user is asking for the date control also since the Vendor is having the relevant certificate till 31.03.2012 and after that, lower rate Tax deduction will not be allowed.
    Simple option is to change the Vendor Master with the original tax type+ Tax code (Normal Rate) combination to calculate tax at the normal rate. But if could not cross the amount limit before 31.03.2012 then that will be difficult to keep an eye on date i.e. 31.03.2012 and then change the master data of u201CNu2026u201D No. of Vendors .
    We want to put a condition in a system as; system should check the system date with the tax type date to get a date control. We have restricted the date of u201Cnewly created tax typeu201D till 31.03.2012.
    In case of MIRO testing, we have use a user exit which is correctly comparing the system date with the tax type date in runtime. If the tax type date is older than system date then system is throwing an error to change the master date (FK02 / XK02) of subject vendor.
    In case of FB60 we are facing a problem since not able to cross confirm the tax type date with the system date. We are trying BTE u2013 1140 for FB60 but in runtime we are not able to get the tax related details / tables.
    Is there any workaround or way in BTE u2013 1140 for FB60?
    Regards,
    Shridhar
    Edited by: Shridhar Sawant on Nov 2, 2011 2:23 PM

    Hi Ramesh,
    In the SAP Std. setting of Formula we are maintaining one more line for same TAX TYPE + TAX CODE + COUNTRY combination but for the ending date of lower rate tax deduction.
    Since there is no "To date" option in Formula setting, we are maintaining one more line For e.g. in the 1st line we have a date as 01.04.2011 (i.e. Valid from) and in the other line we have mentioned date as 01.01.2012 (i.e. To date) since Vendor is having the lower rate tax deduction certificate uptill 31.12.2011.
    In the first line of formula (Valid from 01.04.2011) we have maintain :
    To Base amt              W/tax    Reduction base amt.
    175,000.00                 3.00               -
    9,999,999,999.00     10.00     175,000.00
    In the second line (Valid from 01.01.2012) of formula we have maintain :
    To Base amt             W/tax    Reduction base amt.
    9,999,999,999.00    10.00               -
    Cross confirming the various scenarios since date accumulation of tax setting is on in Tax Type that we are considering.
    Will confirm to you the change suggest by you.
    If these changes doesn't work then we have to go to the option of User exit or BTE for MIRO and FB60 testing.
    Have any idea about the above mention settings ?
    Regards,
    Shridhar

  • Extended withholding tax deduction from customer credit

    hi all
    configured the extended withholding tax for deducting tds from customer credit line items.
    deduction is required only after the amount accumulation 2500/- (this is also configured)
    1.is the recipient type and country is not required for the customer tds..? (it is not visible in the customer master, but is in vendor master)
    2.in the amount accumulation for 2500/- consider the following scenario.
       >>first bill amount 2450/- (no tax deduction)
       >>second bill for Rs.100/- from which i need to deduct tax for 2550/-, since Rs.100 is not enough to deduct 10% tax from tax base 2550.00 it is throwing error.
    pls help
    with best regards,
    sallu c.mathew

    Hi Ajeesh,
    As already mentionned in standardf help from sap, you use J1INCUST which is a report to record the with. tax certificates sent to you by your clients. In doing so, the system clears the wi. tax to a G/L account that records how much tax your customers have withheld on your behalf, known as the customer tax creditable account. You can offset this tax against your income tax payable at year-end.
    And you run the report immediately you receive a certificate from a customer.
    Then system creates an accounting document to transfer the withholding tax from the G/L account for the withholding tax deducted by your customers to the customer tax creditable account.
    Best regards,
    Tarek

  • Vendor tax deductions

    Hi all,
    Same vendor with different tax deductions. How to capture?

    Hi raju,
    Vendors are subject to withholding tax and input tax that means vat are anything
    sales tax related to customer that is output tax.
    In withholding tax as per 194c rent and commision salraies and traveling borkerage and interest this are related to wth
    for this need to create withholding tax code and tax rates these tax code are assinged to vendor master based on tax code its automatically deducted,
    related vat input need to create tax codes in ftxp at the time of invoice or payment if u select tax code its automatically deduct and its goto respective account based on assingment.

  • Query Regarding With holding tax deducted

    Hi,
    Hi,
    I am facing one problem with With Holding Tax deduction.
    Let us explaining with example: 
    1)  Ist I passed one entry through T.Code: f-48 then deducted some TDS (Rs. 5000/- down payment).
    2) IInd I passed one invoice T.Code:  f-43 then deducted TDS (Invoice amount Rs. 10000/- but tds base amount entered Rs. 5000/-).
    Here above I passed two entries and deducted total amount of TDS. 
    3) While at the time of balance amount payment T.Code:  F-53 again system will deduct TDS. 
    I am facing problem here. Why system is again deduct TDS at the time of balance payment.  Already balance amount of TDS duducted at time of Invoice.
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Srinivas Gundala

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • Tax deductions with tax directive

    I am running a South African payroll (4.6c)and need to know the following.
    1. How are other sites handling Retrenchments
    2  we are using normal tax deductions via the tax tables but on retrenchments we would like to capture a directive for the tax on infotype 0149. Keep in mind the tax directive will be received after the last payroll
    3. then we have a unique situation as follows....it could be 4 months after leaving that an employee is entitled to  a bonus which needs to be run via a payroll
    4. so in a nutshell an employee pays normal tax, then gets retrenched and needs tax deducted from a tax directive, then gets a bonus where normal table tax needs to be deducted.
    This is rather urgent as we need to pay out the retrenchments within 3 weeks
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    1.check whether the TDS tax type and tax codes are attached to theparticular vendor master and liable (check box) is tricked or not.
    2. check the vendor code .......field status of the account group of the vendor belongs to.....are optional or not.
    3.check the field status group of the GLs to be posted and also the reconciliation GL account whether the withholding tax field is optional or not.
    If the withholding tax field are not optional make the field optional for the 3 cases above written.
    Hope the problem will be solved.
    With regards,
    Sudipto

  • Pre-Tax Deduction Wage Type

    What is the best practice to create a new Pre-Tax  Deduction Wage Type that will be used for a new Benefit related program?
    I will need this new pre-tax  deduction wage  type to be processed in Third Party. 
    Thanks,

    You can copy one of the model wagetypes BA , BE , BR series has most of benefits wagetype.
    BA_ _ EE Contribution
    BE_ _  EE Contribution
    BR_ _  --> Employer Contribution
    M730     401K contribution
    1. goto Pu30 use one of the model wagetype and copy to a custom wagetype
    2. change it hr payee and vendor number in the SPRO--> Payroll --> Payroll US --> third Party remittance node

  • There is no Professional Tax deduction showing

    There is no Professional Tax deduction showing.
    Regards,
    Ninad

    Check the configuration tables V_T7INP* you will get an idea and maintain a valid record in IT0588 with sub type 0003 then check.
    Regards
    Venkatesh

  • Non deductable tax & deductable tax

    Dear ALL
    What are Non deductable tax & deductable tax?
    How system determines which is the deductable & non deductable tax?
    Regards
    SANTOSH KADAM.

    hii
    FO some material we will be availing the CENVAT credit , that is called CENVA deductible . like raw material ,consumable, capital item with excise duties .
    For Some cases , material will be excisable ,but we won't take CENVAT credit , this is called CENVAT non deductible.
    Like , spare parts,some other material..etc.
    IFu r using TAXINJ, maintain all the tax code conditions with Non deductible.
    So that system will automatically hit the materials account for Non deductible materials .
    Thanks

  • Income Tax Exemption on Professional Tax Deducted for Tamilnadu Employees

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on India Payroll and configured Professional Tax for Tamilnadu employees. Professional Tax is deducted correctly for the employee in the month of August and then in month of January.
    However while calcuating income tax exemption system is considering only amount deducted in the month of August for the exemption upto December month and in the month of January its cosidering PTax deducted in the month of August and January both. In case of Maharashtra employees form first month its considering annual projected Professional Tax amount for Exemption.
    Can anyone guide me what changes i have to do for considering projected PTax amount for exemption in case of Tamilnadu employees.
    Thanks in advance.
    OMKAR

    As per standrad the for chennai professional tax is projected for every six months right
    so it is takeing like that  say the entire amount will be upto to Projection period so it is takeing for that period
    We have similar issue at one of the client place that is instead of deducting the PTAX for every six months it has to be deducted
    for mothly so we have changed the frequnecy of deduction from six months to monthly so than it has shown the entire project amout yearly
    and  lets wait for the expert views on this

  • MRO reversal in case of Withholding tax deducted

    Hi experts,
    We have pass MIRO with deduction of TDS from vendor by mistake and we have issued the check to vendor against same MIRO check was en cashed.
    we found the mistake after en cashment of check.
    before MIRO reversal when i try to reset the payment document system asking to cancel the check and showing message FS642
    I found that because withholding tax in MIRO this is showing. without withholding tax in miro payment document is resetting.
    In my case check information resetting and cancellation is not possible.
    without cancellation of check is there any solution for resetting payment document for reversal of MIRO ( It is required to reset the payment document from cleared item to open item before reversal the MIRO)
    quick and useful answers duly rewarded.

    thanks for your reply,
    cancelltion of check is not possible, because check already encashed.
    I have also tried manual reversal of tds, but still it is showing in J1inmis, but TDS Gl account was cleared
    when i try to challan updation for the above line items through J1INCHLN it is showing error message
    No unpaid tax lines exist for the given selection criteria.
    Message no. 8I702
    Diagnosis
    The corresponding withholding tax line  &1& is not present in WITH_ITEM table.
    System response
    For withholding tax recovered from the vendor, tax line is present in table BSIS, but the corresponding entry is missing in table WITH_ITEM , which is necessary for challan updation. Check the entries.
    Procedure
    check entries in table WITH_ITEM for the open tax items chosen for clearing.
    please help me

Maybe you are looking for

  • Scheduling agreement,(GR value is wrong)

    I have one scheduling agreement, the price is 1.31 INR from 10.10.2007 and i made GR for this three times, it shows correct quantity and value in Purchase order history, in 18.10.2007 the one GR is showing me wrong value, per material isit, showing m

  • How to sign in to the forum using Firefox w/ NoScript

    Apparently this site uses "suspicious cross-site POST requests" according to NoScript in Firefox. Until this changes, you'll need to tweak the NoScript settings a little in order to be able to sign into your community.vzw.com account with NoScript XS

  • Document attachment

    Hi, I am working with document attachment (DMS), Here I am facing the problem. The Document available at one PC. Create document In SAP and attached in material master. SAP system finds the document in same System and did not find in other system. Be

  • Not able to stop flip effect available in the distortioneffects swc

    Hi, I am using flip effect available in the distortioneffects.swc component(http://blogs.adobe.com/auhlmann/archives/2007/03/distortion_effe.html).I am trying to stop a running flip effect.Though the isPlaying property of the effect is false when i t

  • Variance in MIRO can not post to stock account (price control:MAP)

    Hi, all As I know, if there is variance between PO price and INVOICE, the variant value will be posted to the stock account, if material with Moving Average Price. But when I test this process in my system(4.6C), the variance was posted to a variance