Tax not calculating for parked invoices

Hi
We are using external tax system to determine taxes in SAP. When an invoice in MIRO is posted normally, the external tax system is called and tax is getting updated. Whereas, when the invoice is parked for future posting, tax is not being calculated.
Please help.

Hi Nikitha
I am able to park the document with tax. The problem is when I return to the parked document, I cannot see the tax in the field i.e., it shows 0.00 and therefore the system does not allow me to post the document.

Similar Messages

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

Income Tax not Calculated for one employee.

Hi experts,
we have updated our patch lvl upto 86. Budget Changes Note is applied already. Now the Problem is with one employee.
Out of 1000 employees for one employee /436, /446 and /450 generated correctly with correct figure. But /460 is not generated.
I can see in the log /451 is generated with the amount exactly as /450.
Why system is not generating /460?
Can anyone guide me?
Regards
Nasim

Well the reaults are surprising as cross financial arrear /616 is only 1385.96 and relief generated by this is 18776. Which is simply not possible. Even in FY 2010-2011 relief should not be generated as relief only comes when employee is end up paying more taxes than last year tax on arrears. Now since tax slabs are increased, relief will not be egenrated.
This issue you can check with OSS message.
IF you want to deactivate the Section 89 relief implementation switch S89SW constant as 0 in table V_T511K. It may also activated on employee level, then you need to check IT0588/ subtype 4. Before deactivating it check out the impact after deactivation in case of retro as i may increase/ decrease the past tax.
Please note that implementation level switch supposed to be activated/ deactivated only once in lifetime of SAP system.

F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
Prabin

You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

Business object type for parked invoices

Hi,
We are using documentum to store documents that have been attached to business object types in SAP. The business object types are configured in transaction OAC3 to point to a pre-configured content repository.
Having this configuration allows the object type to use the "services for objects" option, enabling it to store attachments.
The business object types for invoices have been configured and we are able to store attachments. However this does not seem to work for "Parked invoices". The configuration in the "services for objects" component is not there and the feature to store the attachment is disabled.
As the configuration needs to be done for all object types that need to be able to store attachments, maybe someone here can indicate what the object type is for parked invoices. Alternatively, maybe there is a way to look up the various business object types.
Any help you can provide is appreciated.
Thanks.
Kind Regards,
Giwan

Hi ,
Thank You for your reply.
I created inquiry . it takes BUS2031.But BUS2031 is used for quotation.But that inquiry is open in VA12(Change Inquiry) Transaction,not open in VA22(Change Quotation).
Is there any setting for BOR object types to Document Types.
Please give me a reply as early as possible.It's very urgent.
Thanks,
Saritha

Std workflow for Parked Invoices?

hi guys
are there any std workflows for parked invoices? Our requirement is that once the Finance clerk creates a customer or vendor invoice he should only be able to park it and not post the invoice. Once the invoice is parked then the system should trigger a workflow and a notification neeeds to be sent to the approver to approve the invoice. Once it is done the finance clerk will post the invoice.
I switched on the event trace and did a trace on while creating a parked invoice. No event is triggered when the document is parked. If i post the document the event POSTED of object FIPP is triggerd. So since we dont have any std events raised when a document is parked is it possible to have a workflow?

Hi,
The event FIPP.CREATED is raise via the customizing (SPRO)
Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting global setting -> document -> document parking -> create workflow variant for parking documents.
Assign co.code to a workflow variant for parking documents.
Have a look at ws10000051.
Regards,
Ronit.

Accounting documents are not posted for Excise invoice

Hi,
1. The Excise invoice has been created with reference to F2 invoice but the accounting documents is not posted for excise invoice, what is the settings needs tobe maintained to post the accounting entries to excise invoice..?
2. where we will maintain number ranges for excise invoice..?
Thanks
Rao..

hi
1. The Excise invoice has been created with reference to F2 invoice but the accounting documents is not posted for excise invoice, what is the settings needs tobe maintained to post the accounting entries to excise invoice..?
Not sure but can u try to relese this to accounting
2. where we will maintain number ranges for excise invoice..?
Excise invoice number range is depend on Excise series group.
T-Code : SNRO
Following is the No. Range Objects related to Excise, select the proper no. range object as per your requirement.
J_1I57FC - 57FC Number Range
J_1IARE1 - ARE1 Doc No object based on Series Group
J_1IARE3 - ARE3 Doc No object based on Series Group
J_1IBOND - Excise Bonding: Bond number object
J_1ICERT - Withholding Tax Certificates (India)
J_1ICHLNNO - Internal number range for challans
J_1ICONPLA - Consolidated PLA serial no. generation
J_1IDEPINV - Excise Invoice Number for Depot Invoices
J_1IEXCEXP - Export excise invoice number range
J_1IEXCINV - Excise invoice number
J_1IEXCLOC - Local excise invoice numebr range
J_1IEXCTST - Excise invoice with intervals
J_1IEXINEX - Excise invoice number for export
J_1IINTNUM - Internally document number to be generated
J_1IINTPR2 - Despatch serial number
J_1ILIC - Excise Bonding: License number object
J_1IPLA2 - PLA part II number range object
J_1IRG1 - RG1 Number range object
J_1IRG1_T - No. Range for RG1 - Excise group / Material
J_1IRG23A1 - RG23A part 1 no. range object
J_1IRG23A2 - RG23A part II number range object
J_1IRG23C1 - RG23C part I number range object
J_1IRG23C2 - RG23C part II number range object
J_1IRG23D - Folio Numbers for RG 23D
Check the link
Re: Excise Invoice Number Range
excise invoice and domestic invoice sharing same number range

Accounting document not generating for excise invoice.

Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help
regards
Subrat

IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if the following is maintained or not
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAED PLA AED account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAAT1 PLA AT1 Account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLABED PLA BED account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLACESS PLA cess account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLAECS PLA ECS Account
DLFC       CR Credit      PLASED PLA SED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AED RG 23 AED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23AT1 RG 23 AT1 Account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23BED RG 23 BED account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23ECS RG 23 ECS Account
DLFC       CR Credit      RG23SED RG 23 SED account
DLFC       DR Debit       MSUSP CENVAT suspense account
Also IMG -> In Logistics u2013 General -> Tax on Goods Movement -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
Check if for all Excise group u2013 DLFC u2013 Company Code combination GLs are maintained or not (especially in production client)

MIGO-Capturing problem-Item is not available for Excise invoice,deselect th

Hi Gurus
while doing MIGO and part 1 posting am getting following error
MIGO-Capturing problem-Item is not available for Excise invoice,deselect the item
kindly help in this
Maruthi

hi
check all settings in J1ID
or
in po did u got ur all values correctly for excise cess and hcess
if yes then check ur vendor excise details in j1id
if above setting are done properly then check ur CIN setting in spro>log gen>tax on goods movement >india>account determination >specify excise acct as per transaction/specify G/L acct as per transaction
regards
kunal

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

WF for parked invoices

I need to create a workflow for parked invoices and I have a couple of questions.
(1) I am copying template WS20001003, but at the end of the WF I want someone to post the invoice, however this WF doent allow you to do that, is there a SAP standard way of doing this or do I need to create my own subtype and method?
(2) another requirement I have is for the AP clerk to choose who to send the WF too, and that perosn can then reject the WF and send it back to the AP clerk, who then will resend it to someone else. I can figure out how to let the AP clerk choose who to send the WF to but how do I allow it to get passed back?

Hi,
I think your first requirement can be achieved thru authorization. Give only the concerned person the authorization to post the document.
Regards,
Raj

Accounting document not generating for excise invoice-please help

Dear all ,
my issue is
accounting document not generating for excise invoice
we are creating accounting document in J1iin
with refferance to billing document but the accounting docuemnt is not generating
the accounting document for billing document is generated
so why the accounting document for excise invoice is not genrating its showing the correct amount in BED ,cee and HE Secc.
please help

Dear G. Lakshmipathi,
As uknow i am getting problem when i am creating the debit memo
so is there any specific ETT for debit memo is there .because we are not maintaining delivery type to billing type here in CIN setting
so its not goods removal through sales . so what will be transaction type for this.
how to check the error that why the accounting document is not generated as no error log is also comming.
so please help me in this regards.
Thanks with Regards
Subrat

Script sub window not opening for particular invoice

Hi Experts,
I am facing problem in my invoice script.That is for some invoice the Script Write form Rstxc-Tdclose = X so it is directly coming out from the window after opening.
For two invoices only i am facing this problem.
Here that particular window is not displaying for some invoices.main window other windows are working fine.
Please,Give me some suggestions where the rstxc structure updated in write_form.
Regards,
Nandha

Nandha,
Is thhis related to BW ?
maybe the ABAP forum would be of better help..
Arun

Duties are not calculating for new tax code

hello all,
I have some tax codes through which i am able to calculate the BED and so on. now BED rate has been changed so have created new tax code, but with that code BED is not calculating only SHEC is calculating.
What could be the reason for this pls explain me.
Thanks
Murali

Hi,
Please check whether you have maintained the Tax % Rates of the new Tax Code in the particular condition records.
With Regards
Sagar

Tax not calculating for parked invoices

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for