TECO in COHVPI for orders with COGI errors

Hi Gurus,
We would like process TECO for process orders using COHVPI (possibly in the background) while some of the orders may have COGI errors and thus messages are displayed for each order. Is there a way to bypass these messages as default, causing the the errors to remain in COGI.
TIA
M2202

Hi,
You can delete the errors in COGI & then do TECO in background mode in COHVPI transaction
Regards,
Senthilkumar

Similar Messages

  • Pricing procedure for order with reference from order

    Dear Friends,
    If I create a sales order with reference to another sales order of different type, the pricing procedure is copied too.
    But I would to use another pricing procedure for second document
    I found the oss note 14136 but this is for reference from invoce
    I tried to create new data transfer routine for orders in copy from 51, but does not work
    Can you help me??
    thanks
    best regards
    GdA

    > If I create a sales order with reference to another sales order of different type, the pricing procedure is copied too. But I would to use another pricing procedure for second document,
    Based on my understanding of query.
    You are looking for a different pricing procedure in second doc.
    For instance, the PricProc for SalesDoc1 is ZPR001 and  the PricProc for SalesDoc2 is ZPR002, in addition to that, you want SalesDoc1 to become reference doc for SalesDoc2.
    For this, ZPR002 & ZPR001 should have common base price condition type and rest pricing can change.
    And for maintaining different Pricing Procedure with similar combination of sales area for SalesDoc1 & SalesDoc2, maintain different document pricing procedure for both docs and maintain Pricing procedure accordingly..
    Thanks & Regards
    J Prakash

  • Restriction of Reverse GI - 262 movement type after GR for order with 101

    Hi all,
    How to Restrict Reversal of Goods Issue by 262 for a Production order after Goods Receipt (GR-101) for Porduction order is posted.
    eg will make more clerity.
    Step 1- After creating Production for Finished Material, I post Goods Issue GI against production order with 261 movement type.
    Step 2- Confirmed the Production order for Finished Material.
    Step 3- Make GR for Finished Material with 101 movement type.
    Now If i want to Post Reversal of the Goods Issue posted previously with 261 movement type for Semifinished Material, system should not allow to do that, but system allows me to do same with 262 movement type.
    as the same material i already issued against production order & is consumed. so if some one want to makes Reversal GI with 262, it should not allow.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Go through the following steps-
    1) Tcode BS22
    2) Select CNF and double click on it.
    3) New entry
    4) RMWA- Goods Movement set as prohibited. save
    Arun

  • Internal Order Settlement for Orders with Revenues

    Hi
    How do you set up the system to allocate costs only to a cost centre and not the revenue for internal orders with revenues. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    In the allocation structure you have give source cost elements .. there give only Cost Elements/group of cost elements which are relating to expenses.. .. then only expenses will be settled .
    best regards
    assign points if useful
    Message was edited by:
            Emani

  • Problem with embargo check for orders with textposition

    Hi all!
    Our orders get embargo checked by GTS. Some of the orders do have textpositions (Typ AGTX), that causes errors, because they don't have a material number or plant.
    Where can I customize, that these textpositions should not be embargo checked?
    Thank you for your help.
    kind regards
    Sabine

    Hello Sabine,
    you would have to modify BADis for MM0A and SD0A document transfers saying when transferring document with items having AGTX filled not to be relevant for GTS.
    Materials Management u2192 Purchasing u2192 Basic Functions u2192 Foreign
    Trade/Customs u2192 SAP GRC Global Trade Services- Plug-In u2192
    Business Add-Ins for SAP GRC Global Trade Services u2192 Change and
    Expand Document Data for Transfer
    Sales and Distribution u2192 Foreign Trade/Customs u2192 SAP GRC Global
    Trade Services- Plug-In u2192 Business Add-Ins for SAP GRC Global Trade
    Services u2192 Change and Expand Document Data for Transfer
    Hope it helps,
    Best regards,
    Gabriel.

  • GR for Order (MVT 101) - Error - Table entry does not exist

    I am getting error while posting GR for production order via MVT 101.
    After resolving errors on G/L account and cost element, now this is the only error that I can't seem to resolve:
    Check table TFBEFU_CR: entry 10 does not exist
    Message no. M7001
    Using SE16 I tried to check for this table, but system says it is not active in dictionary.
    Please help.

    Hi                                                                               
    Please, kindly check the note  183647 - Error message M7001.                                                                               
    As indicated in it, please, maintain the customizing entry in  transaction OPK9 for your valuation area and re-test the system behaviour afterwards.                                                    
    Regards,
    Mauro

  • Sales Order with WBS - Error CJ 070

    Hello Friends,
    I have got one typical requirement from our client.
    The client is in cosmetics business and would be spending huge amount for promotional campaigns. Now the client would like to collect all the costs under WBS tool as statistical and wanted to link the WBS to the sale order. So that we can compare the sales generated for each campaign.
    Now when I try to simulate the scenario, the system is throwing the following error message:
    Message no. CJ070
    Diagnosis
    You are attempting to assign a sales document to WBS element I/0065-2-1. WBS element I/0065-2-1 is a statistical WBS element. In this case you cannot assign a sales document item.
    And in addition to this, the client does not want to use other objects like internal order etc. for some other reasons.
    Can you please advise any suggestions?
    Regards,
    Santosh Varanasi

    Hello  Santosh ,
    Could you please refer to the SAP note 43875, which explained the
    system behaviour about CJ070?
    In the standard system, when creating a sales order and trying to assign
    the sales order item to a statistical WBS element, error message
    CJ 070= "WBS element & is a statistical WBS elemement" is displayed.
    A statistical WBS element cannot be the account assignment
    object for a sales order item as correctly indicated in the attached
    note 43875. This is the standard system behaviour.
    We don't recommend you to deactivate the error message CJ070 because of
    the fact that the assigmnet will be checked in the sales order, in the
    delivery - during the PGI and in the billing. Althrough you will be able
    to create a sales order, you will not be able to make PGI (for
    example).
    The only one way to use the statistical WBS element in the sales order
    is to use the statistical internal order in the sales order and
    assign this statistical internal order to a statistical WBS element.
    Best regards,
    Ronghua Fan

  • Looking for classfiles with verification errors

    Hi,
    I am writing code for verification of my optimized Java byte code. My only problem is that I wish to have a set of class files with known verification errors so that I use them to throughly test my code. Generating such classfiles myself will waste lots of my times.
    I will be thankful if someone can point me towards right direction. How can I find such class files?
    Looking for your reply

    HowToDoIt wrote:
    There are 100s of things that could go wrong with class files. Each bytecode instruction (there are around 200+ instructions) needs to be tested and so is class file format.
    I can change class files to test few things easily otherwise, I have to spend a great deal of time to create my self of classfiles with errors. Hence it would be great if I could find an already existing class files, made by some community of developers, with known verification errors and I could test my code throughly without any time wasted.I don't say that you won't find it, but you better start creating those classes while you are waiting. It's unlikely that you will find such classes unless Sun has some unit tests available.
    Kaj

  • Purchasing report for orders with GR

    Hi All,
    I need to do reporting on the purchasing values only for PO item with movement type 101,102 and few other related to GR.
    Objective is only PO items where item goods receipt has happened.
    Will the 2LIS_01_ITM do with BWVORG? Or any other extractor needs to be used
    Regards,
    Pal

    You can do it either in data loading level using routine or at Report level.
    I prefer doing it at data load level  ,like manasi said..write routine to filter out unwanted movement types.
    Better keep dso in your model and between dso to cube you write this so that in future you enhance it then you just need to modify the logic between the dso and cube..
    Regards,
    RK

  • Install 3rd Party Vendor Certificates for use with WebVPN - ERROR

    I have windows 2008 R2 as CA Standalone Root. when i am generating the certificate request from cisco ASA and importing it in CA SERVER i am getting this error. please tell me i am using asa image 8.0.2 doing it in GNS3 and i have to implement it. however in windows 2003 servers the same request is importable.
    ERROR:  asn1 bad tag value met asn 267

    hey guys the above issue was resolved. now i have following error.
    1- anyconnect popup with WARNING MESSAGE: Warning: "The following Certificate received from the Server could not be verified: "
    2- on asa i can see following debug messages.
    CRYPTO_PKI: Sorted chain size is: 1
    CRYPTO_PKI: Found ID cert. serial number: 02, subject name: cn=admin
    CRYPTO_PKI: Verifying certificate with serial number: 02, subject name: cn=admin, issuer_name: cn=ciscoasa, signature alg: SHA1/RSA.
    CRYPTO_PKI(Cert Lookup) issuer="cn=ciscoasa" serial number=02                                                 |  .
    CRYPTO_PKI: Invalid cert.
    do let me know why is this happening. i have installed both CA and Indetity certificates on cisco asa 8.4.
    my client OS is Win7.

  • Conf Qty 'Zero' in Schedule line for order with header block

    Hi,
    Am facing with a suituation where the confirmed quantities are set to '0' when there is a delivery block at header. was this issue been experienced by any and if so what was the solution sought? pls share
    there are active user exits but none are handling the change in the quantities.

    Hi,
    I think this is config at the item category / schedule line category level.  Check with your functional consultant.
    Regards,   Andy

  • MIGO GI FOR ORDER

    Hi every experts,
    When doing GI for order with MIGO,If the user change the ordered qty,and Posting good issue qty is more than ordered qty,when check it,how I can make the error message pop up.
    tks& regards.
    David.

    Hi,
    You must be getting the warning message.Take this message number and go to transaction code OMCQ to change the error category W to E.
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Unit of Measurement - MB31 Goods receipt for order

    Hi,
    we maintained production unit (MARC-FRTME) for some materials. Now the goods receipt for order with MB31 suggests this production unit (MSEG-ERFME). The customer's requirement is that MB31 suggests the quantity in base unit of measure (MARA-MEINS). The quantity should be the entered value in the confirmation of the last operation.
    I implemented BADI WORKORDER_GOODSMVT (IF_EX_WORKORDER_GOODSMVT~MANUAL_GOODS_RECEIPT) to convert the quantity from production unit to base unit of measure. The stock is increased correctly but the Purchase Order Unit of Measure (MSEG-BSTME) is in base unit and not in production unit. If the material document is displayed with MIGO the quantity ordered (Tab Quantity) is wrong. The quantity is the production quantity and the unit is the base unit.
    For example:
    MARA-MEINS:   PC
    MARC-FRTME:  XY
    1 XY <=> 12 PC
    Production order: 13 XY (=156 PC)
    MB31 with 100 PC
    MIGO: Quantity orderd: 13 PC (instead of XY)
    Does anyone have an idea how this problem can be solved?
    Thanks!
    Best regards
    Martin

    You can attend this issue by activating batch classification. Extend the classifcation view and maintain batch classification for the Unit of measurement of the material.
    Chris

  • Down payment request for contract with periodic billing

    Hi Friends,
    Could anyone help me in understanding the configuration settings for down payment / advance payment senario for a CONTRACT which has Order related billing (I have done for Order with milestone billing plan).
    The contract has order related *periodic billing plan* where settlement period is suppose quaterly billing and actual invoice is happening on 1st date of the quarter. But i want to create a down payment request say 10 days before the billing date[(actual invoice(F2) date] of every quater as an advance payment/ down payment.
    FYI...
    For order i am using standard billing rule 1 in milestone billing plan for final invoice but for downpaymnet billing dates (added additional settlement periods then actual invoice settlement period like 3 adv pay ment og 20%, 30% 50% & one actual invoice period for whole amount 100% as D4 doc only) i am manually changing the billing rule as 4 to create a down payment req.
    But in contract as its has periodic billing plan no billing rule changing option (no additional settlement period can be added, only settlement period for actual invoice is getting proposed) so i can't have two different rule for a settlement period. no settlement period can be added separately for adv paymnet/down payment.
    Kindly respond ASAP.
    Rgds
    Manish

    Hi, Many thanks for your response.
    But the down payment functionality for a SO with milestone billing i have already implemented.
    The question was for CONTRACT Side (say rental / service contract). The contract has periodic billing (monthly / Q'ly).
    Kindly let me know if you/anyone has any idea for config settings for a contract with the senario mentioned in previous thread post.
    Thnx & Rgds
    MG

  • Payment Cards - Orders with Billing Plan - Authorization Logic

    Hello Experts,
    Generally, payment card authorization requests are triggered when an order is saved.  How does authorization work for orders with Billing Plans?  Thanks.
    Regards,
    Jess A.

    Hello Jess,
    If you have access to SAP notes please review note 313416. It should explain the system design with regard to payment cards and billing plans.
    I hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Ian Kehoe.

Maybe you are looking for