Term w/Pay

Hi all,
What does Term w/Pay mean in assignment status details.
Best Regards

Which legislation ?
I feel it must be termination with out pay

Similar Messages

How does it effect if a Blanket Purchase Agreement Terms have Pay on 'Receipt'

Hello Gurus,
What will be the impact if a Blanket Purchase Agreement Terms have Pay on 'Receipt'
I understand for a standard purchase order if the Terms have Pay on 'Receipt', as soon as the PO is receipted, it will be converted into an Invoice.
Now for a BPA, how does it help ??
Thanks in advance,
Sheetal

This property will be inherited by the child documents (e.g. standard
purchase orders, releases etc.) created in reference to the blanket orders.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:32 AM, community-admin <

Payment Terms Installment pay

Hi Gurus - Can anyone provide a solution for installment payment term with combination of fixed amount and % (txns OBB8 and OBB9).
For example : For amount 10000, 1st installment would be 4000 and balance due on specific date.
Thanks.

Hi Solomon,
Make 40% payable immediately and the balance in installments.
Example-
Create these terms in OBB8
Term1 - Installment terms
Term2 - Due immediately-40%
Term3 - Due after 30 days-20 %
Term4 - Due after 60 days-20 %
Term5 - Due after 90 days-20 %
In OBB9, maintain as follows -
Term1 1 40 Term2
Term1 2 20 Term3
Term1 3 20 Term4
Term1 4 20 Term5
If this is not what you are looking for, please elaborate your question.
Regards,
Mike

Unhappy long term good paying CUSTOMER this is the wrong email address

We have had home telephone service for with Att (Southwestern Bell) for 30 plus years always paid on time, at&t for some time was trying to get us to change from standard phone service to uverse phone service, finally talked us onto trying it. Mistake it was indeed. First setup was poor quality line constantly had static callers could hardly here us only noise, several calls to customer service and technicians came and tried repairing this went on for couple years, few times tech's leaving late into the evening and no phone or internet service at all. Know when power goes out we have mo phone service to call power company att says we have to buy a battery for some backup. Never had yo before the battery they left is this big battery that is about as big as the modem itself. And the lady at att said it wasn't their battery, then why did their service tech leave it here. Att customer service is horrible. Our internet and phone service will be no more with Att. All over mot being able to make a call when the power us out thats never been a problem in the past, and we will not be buying some battery that is supposed to be included in the service.

This is starting to be a bad experience, unable to change email address att is not customer friendly.

Unhappy long term good paying CUSTOMER tis is the wrong email address

We have had home telephone service for with Att (Southwestern Bell) for 30 plus years always paid on time, at&t for some time was trying to get us to change from standard phone service to uverse phone service, finally talked us onto trying it. Mistake it was indeed. First setup was poor quality line constantly had static callers could hardly here us only noise, several calls to customer service and technicians came and tried repairing this went on for couple years, few times tech's leaving late into the evening and no phone or internet service at all. Know when power goes out we have mo phone service to call power company att says we have to buy a battery for some backup. Never had yo before the battery they left is this big battery that is about as big as the modem itself. And the lady at att said it wasn't their battery, then why did their service tech leave it here. Att customer service is horrible. Our internet and phone service will be no more with Att. All over mot being able to make a call when the power us out thats never been a problem in the past, and we will not be buying some battery that is supposed to be included in the service.

This is starting to be a bad experience, unable to change email address att is not customer friendly.

Payment Term/BP on the level of Charge type in FWO

According to business process I have 2 variants of payment term for transportation with payer:
1)      Prepaid (paid by Agency1(Payer1) in POL port of Loading)
2)      Collect (paid by Agency2(Payer2) in POD port of discharge)
3)      Today customer has a requirement to issue several settlements from one FWO to different business partners on the level of charge type.
Example:
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 1
Payment term: will pay with term prepaid:
Charge type1 - NTFR (Net Ocean Freight)
Charge type2 - BAF (Bunker Adjustment Factor)
BP Role: Payer
BP : Payer 2
Payment term: will pay with term collect:
Charge type3 - DTHC
The problem is how to combine several terms(prepaid/collect/direct) with several BP Roles(Payer)/BP(Payer1/Payer2)on the level of charge type(service) in FWO.
From the fisrt sight this case could be some way covered by standard on 9.1 functionality of «Charge type activation based on incoterm».
But at the same time we some issues with this standard solution, because we need to split payer and term not only for the whole stage, but also for different charges in one stage. An example of this could be port to port transportation without any pre-carriage or on-carriage, but with OTHC/DTHC that could be paid in any term(P/C) separately by the appropriate agent in POL or POD. At the same time all the transportation costs will be associated only with one stage of transportation.
Do anybody has an idea how to split payment term deeper than level of stage?

Hi,
You can use the "Flexible Settlement" function in TM9.1.
Assign the charge types to settlement group.
Assign the settlement group to settlement rule.
Assign the settlement rule to settlement profile.
Best Regards
Clark Huang

TERMS OF PAYMENT AND CREDIT CONTROL AREA

WHERE AND HOW EXACTLY TERMS OF PAYMENT AND CREDIT CONTROL AREA MAINTAINED IN CUSTOMER MASTER RECORD WILL REFLECT WITH EACH OTHER? AND
HOW DOES CREDIT CONTROL AREA CONTROLS THE
TERMS OF PAYMENT OF CUSTOMER MASTER RECORD?

hi
1) terms of pay ment and credit memo----
under customer master record, company code data, and payment transaction tab there terms of pay ment field is there.
2)FD32-----customer credit Matins
regards
sar

How to create Payment terms in SAP?

Dear Experts,
I want to create payment terms "DA" which stands for "Documents against Acceptance".
By using T. Code: OBB8, is it possible?
Is any where we can give the flexibility to mentioned the payment dates or payment days?
Current situation:
"We have a export purchase where we have issues a PO where we have a terms to pay the vendor after 60 days from the date of acceptance of the documents"
Please help.
Regards
Uttam.

Sorry for the Inconvenient caused by me.
Regards
Uttam.

Payment Terms-Manual due date Input-Which field?

Dear Gurus,
I can observe an option at the payment terms of "no default" which means that payment due date has to be entered manually.Is there some field in the order or billing document where the due date can be entered manually.Kindly hep,thank you.
Regards,
Sam Ahmed

Hi
By making due date manual you want to give a free hand to end user for entering any date as due date. He might enter 30 days or 300 days and this is the reason payment terms are used. I don't know about your business scenario but in most of the cases due date is determined from payment terms.
If you want to make it manual then you can enter payment term with pay immediate and enter date in Fixed value date as suggested by Ravin or enter days in add value days field. System will take this date as billing date for accounting document and will calculate payment term days from here and if you payment term is pay immediate then this would be your due date as well.
Thank$

Maintain table TVZBT in other languages (payment terms)

Hi All,
I try to maintain the table TVZBT (languages of payment terms) using the OBB8 transaction.
I do log on in spanish, go to OBB8 and try to maintain the description in portuguese (in GO TO, TRADUCTION) and I maintain PT languages.
But when I save it, the table was not maintained.
If I do log on in portuguese, and go to OBB8 to maiantain this description, then this will be maintained in PT in the table TVZBT.
Someone know how to maintain the languages in this table?? I can't install all the languages in SAP to do log on in all of them.
Regards,
Ale.

I don't think with above steps you can updated language in Table TVZBT. Through those steps you will update this in Table T052U - Own Explanations for Terms of Pay, which you can use in respective outputs.
Refer following SAP Notes, which talks about a SAP Report RVZTERM(Match Terms of Payment TVZB/T vs. T052) which compares above mention tables & creates missing texts in the TVZBT.
- 6571 - Compare payment terms in TVZB/T with T052
- 131999 - RVZTERM only selects customers
If that does help you, better raise a ticket with SAP.
Thanks, JP

Payment immediately - payment term problem

Hi Experts,
We have the problem today that the system does not take into consideration payment terms but pays out everything immediately. Payment term master data are ok.
In MIRO by giving in payment term the system does not read the details and therefore pays out everything.
What can be the root cause?
Thanks for the suggestion,
BB

Hi Brigitta,
In F110 there are several things that can control hwihc items are paid and when:
1 Config - set up of company payments in FBZP
2 Master data in vendor account, including payment terms, methods etc.
3 Information carried at document level - payment terms, blocks etc.
4 Parameters entered in the payment run itself in F110
I would recommned checking carefully the data entered in the document and line item in the vendor account - check the payment term at this level, and the due days. Next to check is that the "Next payment run date" entered in F110 is not too far out, because if you have enetered a late date, and the item falls due before that date, the system will pay it even if it is not due right now.
You can also do a line item query in the vendor account and show the due days or due date column just to confirm.
Regards,
Tony

Invoice is not picked for payment

Hello SAP guru's
I am facing a strange issue with Invoice for payment.
Here, Invoice had been paid and later check was voided and move to open payables but later It's not picked for the payment run after i change the payment terms to Immediatley.
what could be the cause for this? any idea will be appreciated with good reward points.
rgds,

Thanks for reply.
This Invoice is in open payables as i said.
Due date : 08/26/2007, payment terms : PT00 ( pay immediatley).
Other invoices posted after this document to this vendor are posted and paid without any issue.
I am not sure how to check the payment run to consider this invoce for payment though all above parameters allow for payment immediatley.
rgds,

Vendormaster data changes not updated in MM scheduling agreement

Hi,
Can anbody tell me how to update the vendor master data changes for the exsting purchasing documents.

My dear friend ,
Solution 1:
In SAP ,it is not possible. Please shortclose the p.o.and create a new P.o to reflect the payment terms,
Solution 2:
Normally in all industries they will send a official letter stating the terms of payment has been amended. You will get the payment as agreed. While posting the MIRO change the payment terms and pay the vendor.
I think this the solution you have to choose any one no other go
G.Ganesh Kumar

FI Master Data list

Hi,
Can anyone provide me with a list of Master Datas required to be prepared in the FI and CO modules? Any link for this kind of information?
(Will award points)

hi,
master data in fi i
gl accounts
bank
fixed assets
Also we have to give to mm wht codes for vendors plus fi-costing views for material
For sd we have to give terms of pay for vendor master data
If mm and sd is not implimented that is if only fi is implimented we have to gather customer and vendor master data.
In costing following is the master data
cost centre
Cost element
internal order
profit centre
I hope u r question is solved.
warm regards

Complaint-Need POC for Escalation beyond "Management Team"

We returned an iPhone 5 through the Edge program in November and our account has been charged for a failure to return equipment charge in the amount of $334. Since that time, we have placed numerous phone calls to Verizon to verify that the phone was received and tickets were subsequently created during each call to resolve our equipment charge. Each call we were assured that the phone was received in the warehouse, and that it would take 2-3 billing cycles for the equipment charges to be removed from the account.
When we continued to inquire why the charges were still on our account and late fees were accruing, we were notified that the tickets were not being routed properly to the warehouse to locate our phone. When we further inquired with phone calls, we were advised that the warehouse received a return from us, that there was a iPhone 5 in the box, but that the serial number that they received didn’t match the phone that they were expecting.
I spoke with someone on your Management Team March5th and he tried to help locate the device. He provided IMEI serial numbers for all phones that had been associated with this phone number in the past and asked that I get in touch with Best Buy to seek other IMEI serial numbers so that he could locate the phone (I had used the warranty program through Best Buy just before trading it in the Verizon Edge and that is the reason for the difference in serial numbers). Ultimately we could not resolve the issue. We have asked that the charges be removed from our account our that the representative from the Management team return the box with the iPhone 5 in it that the warehouse received in November from us. He advised that he could not remove the charges or locate the device and there that “If” the device had come through the warehouse it had probably been refurbished and reprovisioned. He also added that he couldn’t be certain that we didn’t send an empty box. This was an odd comment as the each representative that we spoke with in the past have all verified that the warehouse had indeed received an iPhone 5 from us, and we now knew that the confusion was focused on the serial number not matching on the phone.
I take great exception to the change in discussion after 4 months that I would dishonestly send an empty box to Verizon. My wife and I are Federal Homeland Security Employees, have been loyal Verizon Wireless customers for years, ensured that we utilized the Best Buy warranty program to send a working phone back to Verizon.
When I originally signed up for the early Edge program, I anticipated that it would be seamless. I had no idea that 4 months later, countless hours of my time would be spent frustrated, calling Verizon for status, worried about my account, and now being insulted by the Customer Service Management.
Please put me in touch with someone that can resolve this issue swiftly. The representative we spoke with yesterday stated that there was no one with more authority than him to resolve this issue.

i am in the exact same boat. i am a sheriff sergeant, and i have been with vz for years! i switched to the "more everything" plan...and it has been "more of a headache" than anything. two non return device fees added to my account, and i have returned 5 fives. three they cant find, one they sent back because it was late, and one they kept (the nicest of the bunch that was mailed the exact same time).
there "customer service" folks obviously don't know the definition of that phrase, and "andrew" supposedly the "Manager" told me they would refund the amount of the one phone they kept, but not the other. i told him i was dissatisfied with the outcome and wanted to speak with someone above him. he said "the problem is resolved." i reminded him that i was the customer, a good, long term, always paying customer, and i did not think it was resolved. he assured me that it was. i demanded he direct me to his supervisor. he said it would take a "call back" in 72 hours.
i will be returning all phones, paying my actual usage charges, NOT THE BOGUS FEES, and i will take my long term, 280 dollar a month bill to AT&T.
the higher ups in the company should realize the subordinates don't have a concept of what it took to build an empire like verizon has become. but like every failed business before, verizon will collapse if they do not get back to basics of "Customer Service."

Term w/Pay

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for