Test Management Reporting drill-down on Test packages / test sequences?

Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to drill-down my test management reporting down on testpackages or even single test sequences.
Currently, I have only the test plan as lowest level available.
And it would be really great to have some more details to report.
Happy for any ideas,
Jan

Hi ,
You can try below Simple Steps ;
(generate using Wizard)
1. On Solution Explorer -> Right-click on Reports -> Select Add New Report
2.Click on the Next Button -> Give a Data Source name and Click on the Edit Button
3.Select Server Name -> Select "Use SQL Server Authentication" Radio Button
4.Give User name and Password -> Select Database Name and Click on the "OK" button.
5.Press the Next Button -> type your Sql Query -> NExt
6.Select Tabular Option and Click on the Next Button
7.Select [LOC_NAME],[Emp_NAME] for the Group list and the TotalEmployee is for Details -> Next
8.Select Stepped option -> Enbale Drilldown -> NEXT-> Finish(you can use this option if only you require Drilldown option in your report else you an ignore this or simply click next.)
9. Delete EmployeeName Column  -> Paste Emplyee Name Next to LocName As shown in Image.
10 . Delete table1_Details_Group in Grouping Pane
11. Type =Sum(Fields!TOTAL_CUSTOMERS.Value) for Total Customer
12. Right Click on Emp_Name Row -> Insert Row -> Outside Group Above -> TYpe Employee
Thanks
Please Mark This As Answer or vote for Helpful Post if this helps you to solve your question/problem.

Similar Messages

  • Discoverer Report - Drill down

    Hi Friends,
    initially I have executed the discoverer report and got the data in 5 min, but when I am trying to drill down for some column the same report It is re-executing the query again. Actually while doing drill down it should not re-execute the query.
    Kindly suggest is there any setting/solution for the same.
    Regards
    Pankaj

    Are you drilling down by choosing the 'drill to related item' or something like that?
    Or are you using a hierarchy that you've set up already?
    I'm asking as I've never like the drill-down concept in Disco in that you get all columns back in another worksheet that's totally ugly and not end user friendly.
    However, when I've set up a hierarchy and drilled down the hierarchy it just opens the new rows within the level I'm at in the same worksheet and doesn't seem to take any more time.
    Russ

  • How can i call one report from another report (Drill Down Approach)

    Hi Friends,
    I've two reports in completely different layout format.
    One is in Crosstab & another is in Tabular.
    Now i want to call my Tabular report(report 1) from my Crosstab (report 2) without using BO's default drill down feature. Or, you can show using BO's feature if it supports my requirement.
    How to do that?
    Is it at all possible?
    Please share your thoughts. Thanks in advance for your time.
    Regards.
    Satyaki De.

    hi
    you can use openDocument for this.
    [http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir31/en/xi3-1_url_reporting_opendocument_en.pdf]
    I would suggest to use variables that build the HTML code for the hyperlinks dynamically, and display them in your crosstab. Set the display option for the related cells (ie. the cells where your variables are displayed in) so that the cell's contents as interpreted as HTML code.
    Regards,
    Stratos

  • Report Writer GR55 Report drill down line items

    Hi all,
    We have a GLT0 Report in Report writer. The system correctly executes the report and displays account balance for the period. The Report calls T-code FBL3 for display of line items(report/report interface). But when we drill down, the line items are not displayed for the specific period or selection and instead displays the line items for the whole period. (upto date).
    The report was copied from a different system and in the source system it was displaying the line items correctly.
    Could you pl share any inputs for resolving this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sri.

    The issue was fixed by assigning FS10N to the report and drilling down line items from there.

  • Balance Sheet , P&L Report Drill Down Reports

    Hello Experts,
    One of my client requires Balance Sheet, P&L Reports with drill down capability.
    Ex: In standard B1, When you run a balance sheet you will see summary of accounts. Client needs to look into the details from summary report by drill down capability. Have anyone worked with same reports before? Please help.

    Hi Praneeth,
    On the balance sheet, on the top right corner there is a field called - Level - on which you can select 1 to 5 levels. The level 5 gives the complete picture of each account. Same for other financial report like trial balance. Hope that solves your problem.
    Thanks,
    Kanu

  • URGENT: Issue with hierarchy level keys and report drill down

    Hi,
    BASIC STRUCTURE:
    I have created a subject area with 3 facts (FACT_A, FACT_B, FACT_C) and 4 dimesnions (TIME_DIM,DIM_2,DIM_3,DIM_4). Each fact table also has additional aggregate tables aggregated along levels of the time dimension. Also our timw dimension has aggregated dimension tables like TIME_DIM_WEEK, TIME_DIM_MONTH, TIME_DIM_QUARTER and TIME_DIm_YEAR.
    GOAL:
    All 3 facts have the same measures M_1 and M_2 in them but may not have data for the same dimension values selected.
    For example
    For month JAN 2000 FACT_A.M1=100$ and no data exists for JAN 2000 in FACT_B and FACT_C. Then in the report
    for JAN2000 it should show FACT_A.M1= $100, FACT_B.M1 = 0 and FACT_C.M1 =0. In this case I should be able to drill down to the lowest level.
    ISSUE:
    The time dimension TIME_DIM has the following levels - Total -> Year -> Quarter -> Month -> Week -> Day
    However I am having an issue with drill down in the reports whenever I pull metrics from more than 1 fact at a time. I have defined the level keys but not sure if I need to do anything in addition since I am using aggregates.
    I have to fix this issue quickly. Please help me.

    Alastair,
    All the fact tables have aggregated facts as sources.
    I have checked the levels set for each of the sources to the time dimesnion table in BMM and they look okay. So the Time dim table in BMM has 4 source tables
    Time_Day (level set to day, table key is "day"),
    Time_month (level set to month, table key is "Fiscal_Month_Code"),
    Time_Quarter(level set to quarter, table key is "Fiscal_Quarter_Code") and
    Time_Year(level set to year, table key is :Fiscal_Year_Code").
    Note: No time week aggregate added as logical source.
    Again the time dim hierarchy based off of this table has levels: Total -> Year ->quarter -> Month -> week -> day
    The levels keys set for each level are
    Year -> Primary key is Year_Name (YYYY)(Checked as chronological key) and another key is Year_Num (YYYY)(Checked as chronological key)
    Quarter->Primary Key is Quarter_Name (YYYY Qn), another key is Quarter_Number (Format n where n can assum values 1,2,3,4). Both keys are set as chronological keys
    Month -> Primary key is Month_Name (MON YYYY), another key is Month_Num (Format n where n can assume values from 1 to 12) Both keys are set as chronological keys
    Week -> Primary Key is week name (YYYY Wk nn, where nn can have values from 1 to 53), another key is week num (nn, where nn can have values from 1 to 53)
    Day -> primary key set to day (date format)
    Issue1: When I try to drill to lower levels it throws out an error saying report cannot find any data because filters may be too restrictive even though I see data at higher level
    For ex: If I drill down to Year: 2010 and Qtr: 2010 Q2 and M1:$100 when I click on Qtr to drll to month level it throws me the error
    Issue2: when I add year and qtr colums to the report I see data as below which is incorrect
    Year_Name Qtr_Name data:FACTA_M1 Data: FactB_M1
    2009 2009 Q1 $10 $5
    2009 2009 Q2 $20 $80
    2009 2009 Q3 $20
    2009 2009 Q4 $30
    2010 2010 Q1 $100
    2010 Q2 $101
    2010 Q3 $102 $230
    2010 Q4 $103
    2011 Q1 $10
    In the above example year_name is not showing up for 2010 Q2 and after. However if I change the primary key for level 'Quarter' by having key consist of year name and quarter name instead of just quarter name the issue doesnt occur and drill down works great. The only issue is when I drill from qtr it first shows year name and quarter name instead of showing the next level which would be month name.
    Sorry about the long message but I thought you might notice something in how I have set up the keys.
    Thanks

  • Report drill-down

    Hi
    I am having an unsual case. We are executing a standard reports profit centre report that we used to drill-down before. Today, it is acting differnet. For e.g there is a balance appearing for a GL account where the total as at end of the period is zero. If the alance on the report is double-clicked to view the line items it gives a list of documents that equals to zero. I cannot understand why the the report is showing a balance.
    Thanks & Rgds
    NW

    Some things you might to check:
    Actuals/ Plan values?
    Same version?
    Has somebody changed report recently?
    Have you run line item transactions individually and compared?

  • Profit centre report drill down total

    Hi
    I am executing S_ALR_87009722 proft centre report from period 0 to 1. The balance of a bank account is  76,729.18.
    When I drill down to actual line items it's showing the break-ups amounting to 3,320.17; which is only the break up for period 1. Shouldn't this show the break-up of the balance as at the report date?
    We need to see the break-up for 76,729.18 (Balance as at end of period 1).
    The Profit centre currency is different to company code currency and the transaction currency.
    Any assistance is appreciated.
    Thanks & Rgds
    Nadini

    Some things you might to check:
    Actuals/ Plan values?
    Same version?
    Has somebody changed report recently?
    Have you run line item transactions individually and compared?

  • Profit Center Reports / drill down to assigned internal orders

    Hello guys,
    our company does project business. Our project landscape has been implemented in SAP using a profit-center-structure for reporting purpose and internal orders for every project.
    The internal orders (projects) are assigned to a profit center belonging to the conducting profit-center-group (responsible department).
    Question 1:
    Further development of Profit CenterReport S_ALR_87013340 allowing for a drill down from the profit centers to the actual projects that have been assigned to that profit centers.
    Currently (standard report) each profit center can only be watched in a cumulated way. Since many projects can be assigned to one profit center a drill down to the actual project is required.
    Question 2:
    Currently the desired report Profit Center Report S_ALR_87013340 shows the balance. It is desired to see only the cost incurred on the projects, not the settlement. The report should only show pre-selected cost elements. How can we exclude certain cost elements?
    Could you please give us some hints how to handle our issues?
    Regards

    Hi,
    Question 2:
    Currently the desired report Profit Center Report S_ALR_87013340 shows the balance. It is desired to see only the cost incurred on the projects, not the settlement. The report should only show pre-selected cost elements. How can we exclude certain cost elements?
    A1: you can created cost elements(account group) with selected cost elements and use same group in report.
    Or
    A2:enter only selected cost elements in report P&L account group in multiple selection.
    Thanks,
    Rau

  • Reports drill down feature

    Hello,
    there is drill down option that can be used during user-defined report creation
    (SQL Developer 3.1 EA1)
    Do you know where I can find documentation on how to setup it?
    Thanks,
    Andrey
    Edited by: Andrey Goryunov on 10-Oct-2011 18:08

    Hi Slevi,
    You are right with the understanding of the Drill down function. To have a drill down function available the minimum requirement is have at least a single group in the report.
    When we have a group with some underlying data and then when we would like to see data for a particular group, we can see a u201Cmagnifying glassu201D symbol which indicates that there is data for this group and we can use the Drill down function.
    When you drill on a particular group, the data for that group is shown in a new tab.
    I hope this provides some information about the Drill down function used in Crystal Reports.
    Regards,
    Prashant Saduwale.

  • Managment cockpit(drill down settings)

    Hi friends,
    At frame level i want to drill down on particular characterstic eg: region(zregion). what setting i have to made inorder to see 'zregion' field in defining: "Drill down settings"(inside screen, left side list of characterstics) for management cockpit? In selection criteria while defining frame, do i have to give all region values in order to select one of region values through "parameters" option?
    Actually i'm displyaing expenses, eg: exp1 & exp2 on month wise. User wants to see on regionwise these two expenses in the same graphic frame. I want to give through "parameters" option. How can i achieve this? 
    thanks,
    naresh

    Hi friends,
    upto some extent i got required things. I included characterstic 'zregion' in selection criteria step with set of 4 values while designing a frame in cockpit. Now i'm able to see field 'zregion' in drilldown setting option(left side pane of characterstics) and then dragged to right side pane for allowing drill down in frame. Next at presentation mode of frame(cockpit), in for month wise(x-axis,chart type: colon chart) able to see with two expenses. After that i want to drll down on expenses using "parameters" option, it displays list of regions for drill-down. But if i selected any region, it won't show respective regionwise expenses. How can i achieve this?
    thanks,
    naresh

  • Web Intelligate Summer Report drill down and drill up problem

    I use summary table and @aggreage_aware function to design a universy.  I want WI report shows highest level summary table data first, then drill down to next high summary table data.  But when I drill up back,  it still shows be next high summary table data.  I don't use the report to do any calculations.  I just want it shows different level data.
    Detail:
    I have three tables:
    1.  Month_Data table:  - Base fact data table.
    Year
    Quarter
    Month
    Department ID
    Supplier ID
    Score          -- Measure type
    2.  Quarter_Data table: - High level summary table.
    Year
    Quarter
    Department ID
    Supplier ID
    Score          -- Measure type
    3.  Year_Data table:  - Highest level summary table.
    Year
    Department ID
    Supplier ID
    Score          -- Measure type
    I like to create a web intelligence report that shows data from year_data table:
    Year          Score
    2008          105
    2007          99
    2006          90
    If I drill one level down, It will show data from quarter_data table:
    Year (example 2007)
    Quarter1     Score
    Quarter2     Score
    Quarter3     Score
    Quarter4     Score
    If two level drill down, it will show data from month_data table:
    Quarter1
         Month1          Score
         Month2          Score
         u2026
         Month12                     Score.
    No calculation needed on the report.
    I will use follow steps to create a universe:
    1.  Three tables will be three classes.  The classes order is:
         Year_Data class;  Quarter_Data class; Month_Data class.
    2.  When I create universe, I join:
    Year_Data  class to   Quarter_data class:
    Year to year                 1 to n               
    Department ID to Department ID          1 to n
    Supplier ID to Supplier ID          1 to n
    Quarter_Data class to Month_Data class:
    Year to Year               1 to n
    Quarter to quarter               1 to n
    Department ID to Department ID          1 to n
    Supplier ID to Supplier ID          1 to n
    3.  Create a filter class with object Department ID and supplier ID.
    4.  I create two aggregate aware classes:
    Agg_dimension class:
         Year:    aggregate_aware(year_data.year, quarter_data.year, month_data.year)
         quarter: aggregate_aware(quarter_data.quarter, month_data.quarter)
         Month:     aggregate_aware(month_data.month); 
    Agg_Measure class:
         Score: aggregate_aware(year_data.score, quarter_data.score, month_data.score)
    5.  I may re-define year, quarter, month and score as aggregate_aware function for objects in all classes:
         Year:     aggregate_aware(year_data.year, quarter_data.year, month_data.year)
         quarter: aggregate_aware(quarter_data.quarter, month_data.quarter)
         Month:     aggregate_aware(month_data.month); 
         Score:   aggregate_aware(year_data.score, quarter_data.score, month_data.score)
    6.  create user hierarchies: 
    agg_dimension.Year
    agg_dimension.quarter
    agg_dimension.month 
    7.  Figure out Aggregate Navigation  -- it is easy.
    Then create a report.  I put follow objects on report:
    Agg_dimension.year          agg_measure.score
    When I run report, it shows right data:
    Year_data.year          Year_data.score
    On the report. I drill down on year, it shows right data.
    Quarter_data.Year:
    Quarter_data.quarter1                quarter_data.score
    Quarter_data.quarter2                quarter_data.score
    Quarter_data.quarter3                quarter_data.score
    Quarter_data.quarter4                quarter_data.score
    But when drill it up back on quarter, it shows:
    Quarter_data.year     quarter_data.score1
    Quarter_data.year     quarter_data.score2
    Quarter_data.year     quarter_data.score3
    Quarter_data.year     quarter_data.score4
    Not
    Agg_data.year          agg_data.score.
    It has drill up back problem on my report.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Frank Han

    and keyfigures are coming frm 2lis_03_bf..But when i drill down on purchase organization, purchase grou , vwndor account group and planning group then # is coming instead of value....i dont the reason for this..
    Did you chk if you have vendor, purchase org, all this coming from 2LIS_03_BF??
    Can you chk in listcube transaction what is the output by putting the same restrictions as in the query?
    Edited by: mansi dandavate on Jul 10, 2009 11:37 AM

  • Report - Drill Down and more than one evdre (problems)

    Hi people!!!
    I am trying to do a report with 3 evdre's. The report has some columns that are expanded using AfterRange.
    The areas of expansion of the evdre's are one under the other.
    The 3 evdre's works fine until I use the drill down.
    After I do the drill down, just the area of my first evdre looks fine.
    For my last two last evdre's, my AfterRange stops working and no drills happens.
    Somebody already faced this same problem and can assist me?
    Thanks a lot!!

    Hi Sandro,
    thanks a lot for your answer.
    I understand that SLD works like a DNS - but why do I have an ExchangeProfile in the SLD?
    I checked SAPSLDAPI - OK.
    SLDCHECK is OK too! ... but in IB - Repository I get an error while importing SWCV: no connection to SLD.
    I think I have to check the connection between  IB-Repository and SLD ... bad think
    Regards
    Wolfgang

  • My FSG report drill down redirectly to PROD url in the cloned instance

    Hi All,
    Version : R12.1.3
    DB : 11.2.0.3
    My FSG drill down is giving error in my DEV instance ,as the drill down is taking me to wrong url(PRODUCTION)
    Anyone know where to define the hostname for drill down RG.
    Thanks

    Brian:
    Thanks for the reply.
    I found out a simple drop-down list referencing to a conditional MEMBERSET cell (if a then level4 else level 5) works pretty well.
    I do have two questions though:
    1. For LDEP or LALL, it puts the parents on top of the children. Is there anyway to display the children nodes first before their parents? For instance:
    LDEP (2, TOTALFOOTWEAR) gives me:
    RUNNING (LEVEL1)
    Men's Running (LEVEL2)
    Women's Running (LEVEL2)
    WALKING (LEVEL1)
    Men's Walking (LEVEL2)
    Women's Walking (LEVEL2)
    When I really want:
    Men's Running (LEVEL2)
    Women's Running (LEVEL2)
    RUNNING (LEVEL1)
    Men's Walking (LEVEL2)
    Women's Walking (LEVEL2)
    WALKING (LEVEL1)
    2. It took me a while before I realized there is a LDEP function. How did you get LALL LBAS, etc? Is there a complete reference document?
    Thank you! Happy Holidays!
    Brian

  • Syntax for passing Xcelsius parameters to Webi Report (Drill Down)

    Hi,
    I am trying to drilldown from an Xcelsius chart to a webi report by passing the prompts. And I have given the following syntax:
    http://<CMS SERVER>:<PORT>/OpenDocument/opendoc/openDocument.jsp?iDocID=<DOCID>&sType=wid&sRefresh=Y&mode=full&lsSCalendarYear/Month=JAN2009&&lsSBusiness+Category=
    Corporate.
    When I click on the chart in Xcelsius, it opens the webi report in a new window. First & foremost, it asks me to login again(this is during testing from the Xcelsius application itself and I am not sure this would happen when I publish the dashboard to BOBJ infoview server). And then in the Webi report, it is showing the prompts screen, instead of directly accepting the passed on values and displaying the report. Am I doing something wrong? Can anyone please help?
    Kalyan

    Hi, Kalyan!
    I do not know exactly what the problem of your URL/syntax is, but I know that I successfully managed to call a WebI report out of an Xcelsius dashboard. So, let's have a look at my URL/syntax:
    http://<CMS SERVER>:<PORT>/OpenDocument/opendoc/openDocument.jsp?
    iDocID=<ID>&
    sIDType=CUID&
    sRefresh=Y&
    lsSCountryKey=DE&
    So, the differences are:
    -> I use the WebI report's CUID and I put this ID type ("CUID") into the URL: "...&sIDType=CUID&..."
    -> I do not use "sType" and "mode"
    -> The rest, i.e. the report's specific parameters/prompts - all starting with lsS... is the same.
    As I said before: I do not know if there is a relevant difference, but why not giving it a try...?
    Regards
    Micha

Maybe you are looking for

  • Excel sheet to crm5.2

    hi all, the following report fetches data from an excel sheet to an internal table itab and then data from this itab is populated into an idoc. The segment ZVISTAPMS has two char fields. at the following point: Create a data segment for each line of

  • Trouble customizing theme images for resized slide

    I am working with Keystation_eclipse pro theme. I originally chose the 1280 X 720 slide resolution. But I am changing the height to 768 to work optimally with the resolution of my projector. When changed, the background image is scaled but the other

  • The new common forum

    I am so irritated already by the forum's new habit of jumping to the most recent post that this common forum idea is probably the end of my participation.  I simply don't want to read through hundreds of Win subject lines to find something relevant t

  • Using File Name as Watermark

    Is it possible to export a JPEG version of a photo with the file name displayed on the photo? This would be useful for a big proofing job I have. I haven't been able to find any info on this in Aperture support or even any third party software for th

  • Computer won't connect to itunes

    Whenever I go to run itunes it says that it is missing some of the required elements to run itunes andthat I need to reinstall itunes. So I take out my CD and reinstall and when I go to click on itunes it says the same thing. I don't understand why t