Third party contact form widgets no longer working with upgrade - PHP errors

PHP seems to be even more screwed up with the latest update/upgrade to Muse.  The previous upgrade started producing the following error message when I uploaded my site via FTP:
"1 Warning - Connection to PHP file failed. Unable to check if this web server supports PHP needed by Muse forms. Be sure the domain name entered in the FTP upload dialog is correct."
However, everything worked and in participating in some queries here, it seemed to be an oddity versus anything serious (things still worked but an error message popped up for no real discernible reason)
Since the latest update, however, widgets that I have from two different companies for the purpose of emailing me through the website, sending messages, etc, are no longer working and the following message is displayed upon hitting "submit"
" Form PHP script is missing from web server, or PHP is not configured correctly on your web hosting provider. Check if the form PHP script has been uploaded correctly, then contact your hosting provider about PHP configuration."
In checking with my web host provider, I was told
"the page appears to use the script form-u31652.php which does exist on the
server.
Unfortunately that error is not specific enough to point us in the right
direction. PHP is indeed working on the server. However, looking at the
apache web server error logs I can see that the contact form appears to be
looking for a file that does not exist.
To trouble shoot this issue you will want to work with Muse to determine
why the sites coding is looking for the file
/usr/home/NAME/public_html/WEBSITE.com/null."
Any ideas what this means and how to solve this would be great. I've tried re-uploading the entire website, figuring that maybe something wasn't being uploaded via "Modified Only" but it still is happening
Thanks!

That isn't what ended up fixing it, Sanjit. Thanks to this article PHP FAQ for Muse Synchronized Text and help from an online representative from Adobe, was able to troubleshoot with my web provider. Turns out the problem was that a while back Muse deleted the fcgi-bin directory (probably during the previous upgrade, as that is when the PHP errors started to surface with me and others). And it was never put back by Muse even during a clean/full reupload of the website.  Had to have my web provider do it manually.

Similar Messages

  • I used to have an application in my iPhone 4 and 4s that captures business card and creates its content to my contacts. Its no longer working with my i5. Can you recommend me a new apps for this same function

    I used to have an application in my iPhone 4 and 4s that captures business card and creates its content to my contacts. Its no longer working with my i5. Can you recommend me a new apps for this same function

    Try CardMunch it works well for me

  • Smartview indentation no longer working with upgrade

    We are currently running HFM and Smartview with Office 2010. We have updated Smartview from version 11.1.2.1.x Build 271 to 11.1.2.2.310 Build 247. The Zoom In function is no longer working properly.
    In the prior version:
    1. Zoom In = Next Level
    2. Member name Display = Member name and Description
    3. Indention = Subitems
    4. Ancestor Position = Top
    The new version has the same settings however since updating to the new version the indentation no longer happens. 
    Is anyone else experiencing this issue?  Is there a workaround?

    Hi,
    Below is the copy paste of the content from Oracle doc.
    Applies to:
    Hyperion Planning - Version 11.1.2.1.600 and later
    Information in this document applies to any platform.
    Symptoms
    Unable to use smartview column suppression features with an Essbase connection.
    - Start up excel and then go to the smartview menu -> Options -> Data Options -> Suppress Columns section is active
    - Establish an Essbase Shared Connection
    - Go into adhoc mode or just double click on a database to bring up the metadata.
    - Now go to smartview menu -> Options -> Data Options -> Suppress Columns section is grayed out.
    The above feature works fine with a Planning connection.
    Is this an Essbase connection limitation?
    Cause
    Installed the Smartview 11.1.2.1.103 (Build 100)
    Solution
    The following was mentioned in the 11.1.2.2.310 version of the Smart View User's Guide. The description for Suppress Columns was updated as follows:
    To streamline the grid, you can suppress columns that contain types of data that you do not need to view.
    Notes:
    -- In suppressed columns, cell references to Excel formulas are not updated.
    -- The Suppress Columns options are not available when connected to an Essbase data source.
    So from the above, it is not a supported feature when using an Essbase connection.

  • Looking for a third party go to EQ plug to work with Logic.

    Hey folks, here's the deal: I'm looking for a great sounding, versatile, linear phase EQ. This will be used on a track by track basis, so low CPU overhead would be a plus, but I am running this on a dual 2.8 GHz eight core Mac Pro with currently 6 GB's of RAM, later to be expanded, so sound quality is more important to me than anything else. Cheaper, of course, is better, but I don't really want to miss out on quality to save a buck either. I already own two UAD-1 cards, and bought the Precision EQ, and while I like it, it's really mainly for mastering and not for finely tuned mixing work. I also own the DDMF EQ's, and enjoy them. I also own T-Racks 3, and use the linear phase EQ's with that, still, I am looking for something else for some reason. I am mainly using Logic Pro 8, and the linear phase EQ with it as my go-to channel EQ at the moment, but I also own Ableton Live 5, Digital Performer 5.13, and Pro Tools M-Powered 8, so I have access to the EQ's in those. But Pro Tools is only just for getting projects and audio out of Pro Tools, I can't use it well with the rest of my system, so that's that. Ableton is great, but not really what I use anymore, although I wish I had more time to get down with it.
    Anyway, here is what I'm mainly considering, although I could go with any other idea at this point, so please make any suggestion you feel fit.
    1) Ozone 4. (http://www.izotope.com/products/audio/ozone/)
    I like the company a lot, and it's going to be inexpensive for me due to a student discount. I probably will buy it sooner or later, my thoughts are though that it largely duplicates what I already have with T-Racks 3, and I can't see using it necessarily as a channel EQ for some reason, although I probably could. I don't know how it sounds really either, I imagine pretty good, though.
    2) Nugen Audio SEQ 2 Master Edition (http://www.nugenaudio.com/seq2.php)
    Again, not expensive. I do really like the 10 Hz-30kHz possibilites with this guy. I own their Visualizer and other plug ins and enjoy them. I've downloaded the demo and liked that too, but you can't really measure how much you like the sound in a week or whatever. I mainly didn't hear any sound, which is probably good. The interface is less than beautiful, but then again, I'm not buying art here.
    3) RNDigital Unique-lizer. (http://www.rndigitallabs.com/Plug-ins/U ... lizer.html)
    I have their D4 compressor and absolutely love it. I have demoed their Inspector XL and loved that. I think they've got some killer plug ins going, and again, will probably get this sooner or later, likely as part of a package with the Inspector XL and the other EQ (the FirEQ), and a limiter or something. I really like the visual aspect of this plug, it would probably be helpful in isolating a troubling frequency in a snare hit, say.
    4) The UAD Cambridge EQ. (http://www.uaudio.com/products/software ... index.html)
    By now you are noticing that I want a more graphically styled modern EQ, and not a vintage emulating plug in. I intend to add some of those at some point (I guess I have some already with T-Racks and whatnot) but for now I want a super clean and versatile modern plug in style EQ that I would feel comfortable using on every track for it's uncolored sound. This is probably my least consideration, I think I would get much more processing power out of my native processing rather than my two UAD-1 cards, frankly, especially if Snow Leopard performs as promised. I am thinking the UAD-1 cards will turn out to be more of a processing liability more than anything else, I'm new to them though, but that's what it's looking like to me. I am unlikely to want to go to UAD-2 at the moment either, and am suspicious of the limitations of it's processing power vs. native as well. And this seems like an older offering of UAD's, and seems to want to be a "classic" console style EQ as well as the more neutral style version I am looking for... but then again, I don't know much about it compared to most.
    That's the big ones- I have looked into URS, which seems like more vintage emulating stuff to me, as well as Sonalksis, which seems good. Waves is always there. TC Powercore and the Liquid Mix are possible (well TC Powercore unlikely, that's big time money) but I am sort of unwilling to add another Firewire bus PCIe card and am using a Firewire interface.
    If anyone is still awake after this, I'd love to hear your thoughts! I'll be posting this on a few forums so let me know what you think please, thanks, L

    For what it is worth, I am a fan of NuGen, I have both SEQ 1 and 2 and two stereo enhancing tools (stereoizer and stereoplacer I think they're called). Since I have the SEQ 1 it replaces all Channel EQ's. And the stereotools sound great and very lush, in stead of the more usual cheezy combfilterthingies that pass for stereo enhancing tools.
    And I actually like the interfaces. Simple, but stylish, functional and ergonomic (in this case meaning you can see all parameters in a quick glance, no guessing at settings).

  • Moving songs around on iPod no longer works with upgrade to iTunes 7

    Hi.
    I just upgraded iTunes 6 to 7 on Win XP. I used to be able to move songs around on my iPod, but I can no longer do this with the newer version. All of my songs have now been rearranged in a different order than it was originally and I can no longer rearrange them.
    Is this a known bug? Is there something I don't know about the new version? I've scanned all the menus and cannot determine if and how this can be done.
    Thanks!
      Windows XP  

    Update your QuickTime to v7.1.3 and see what happens.
    MJ

  • Selenium no longer working with upgrade of Firefox 22

    I just upgraded to Firefox 22 from 21 now all of my Selenium tests are breaking. Is anyone else having this issue and do you know how to fix it? Thanks
    Here is the error I am getting:
    [error] Unexpected Exception: fileName -> chrome://selenium-ide/content/selenium-core/scripts/htmlutils.js, lineNumber -> 309, columnNumber -> 8
    These test were running great before the upgrade.

    All,
    3Dee here again. I was able to solve my problem by upgrading my Selenium. Fixes were made to Selenium to support FF 22.
    Thanks to all who made the fixes!
    3Dee

  • USB automount no longer working with upgrade to Gnome 2.30/udisks

    Has anyone else had a problem with automounting of flash drives since the upgrade to Gnome 2.30 and udisks?

    I have this problem too. Devices are mounted properly in /media, but there is no icon in nautilus/on desktop. Also there is no icon in gnome-mount applet.

  • Which system does Muse use to make the contact form widget work?

    Hello,
    I am a graphic designer working with a coder to create a new website using Muse. My coder has asked me which system does Muse use to make the contact form widget work.  Looking at the page code it looks like ASP dot net and when the user clicks the button the form data is sent to a script called “FormProcessv2.aspx”. If this is the case which version?  (e.g. ASP 1.0 or 2.0 or 3.0) Does Muse use “dot net” or “.NET” or similar in the documentation? If so then does it say which version (e.g. 1.0 or 2.0)?
    Can anyone help me with these questions?
    Many Thanks
    Emma

    It's unclear what page URL/code you're looking at? Muse does not use ASP. Muse uses PHP for form processing and relies on PHP sendMail to send the form information as an e-mail.

  • New Muse Contact Form Widget

    I was thrilled to discover that the Muse team has created a contact form widget. finaly!!!
    (http://tv.adobe.com/watch/cs6-creative-cloud-feature-tour-for-design/creating-contact-form s-in-adobe-muse/)
    Now I have two questions, in order to get those new widget features I'll probably need to update my version of Muse. right? If so, where can I do it?
    Second thing, in the linked video the man mentioned that these options are only avilable for those who publish there websites through Business
    Catalyst. Is it the truth? if it is this is so upsetting!!!
    Although I am working on my first site with Muse so I'm able to publish it with BC for free, but it is an outrage! as a person who bought only Adobe Muse (and
    not Creative Cloud pack) I was going to publish all of my sites on third-party server!
    I am now wondering is there a way to do something about that? Is there a way to make the wonderful new widget work on any published site?
    Thanks in advance (-:

    Hello,
    Yes, this feature is coming in the new beta of Muse which will be released soon. I'll be posting instructions for participating in the Muse beta shortly.
    In regards to the functionality of the upcoming contact forms feature, Zak clarified this will only work with Business Catalyst in the following thread:
    Form widget
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1040950
    ...the form functionality coming in 2.0 it targeted primarily at contact forms. If you have "quite a large form" then you will likely still want/need to use a different solution.
    The new form functionality uses standard HTML/CSS for the form, but form processing requires integration with server-side code. What will be part of Muse 2.0 works with Adobe Business Catalyst. In order to use the form with some other back-end server solution, the code output from Muse would have to be altered.
    Best regards,
    Corey

  • Muse contact form widget

    I currently have a yearly subscription to Muse and a webbasics account at Business Catalyst and my site is actually hosted on a third party server Hostmysite.com until that subscription runs out. When I went to use the new contact form widget in Muse it does not work. I spoke with an Adobe represenative and they suggested I use the BC web form builder and style it myself with css/html/javascript to look like the one I designed in Muse or host the site through Business Catalyst as is required to use the widget. I asked the represenative if I had the option to host my site at Adobe with my webbasics plan and my Muse subscription and he said that I would need to purchase a separate hosting package for my site and move it to Adobe servers. However I just read at http://www.adobe.com/products/muse/adobe-hosting.html that an Adobe Muse one-year subscription plan includes hosting for one Business Catalyst webBasics site.*. Is there any way to get this contact form to work still utilizing my third party hosting for now without having to do the styling myself. I have seen some mention of pointing the dns to Adobe hosting but right now I do not want to pay for any additional Adobe hosting. Should I be getting one with my package already. I only have one other site that I created in Muse that is on yet another third party host and I used a business catalyst web form builder to create a contact form and that one works fine and syncs with business catalyst but it is limited in it's styling.

    Hi,
    I have found a solution that enables you to use the muse form widget when yor site is hosted on a third party server. You need to create your forms as seperate web pages and then use your free webbasics Business catalyst webspace to host the form, then insert an iframe on the page you want the form to appear on using the insert HTML option. The code for the iframe is:
    <iframe
    height="205"
    width="470"
    frameBorder="0"
    src="http://yourform.businesscatalyst.com/yoursite.html">
    </iframe>
    Regards
    Rick

  • My Client is having a serious problem with the Contact Form Widget

    My Client is having a serious problem with the Contact Form Widget that I can not figure out how to correct.
    I created a website for a client and inserted a Contact Form widget on their 'Contact Us' page. Whenever anyone uses the form, the e-mail my client receive shows my e-mail address as the sender. So, when they 'reply' to the e-mail, the reply is sent to me and not the person who sent the original message. This creates a major problem in that I get barraged with e-mail replies while my client's potential customers go without a response.
    When I look at  'Site Manager > System E-Mails > Workflow Information > E-mail From Address' on the site's Admin Console, it shows my e-mail information. Is this is what needs to be changed?  If it is, what needs to be placed in that field so that the e-mail my client receives shows the senders e-mail information in the 'From' field.  My client wants to be able to click reply and have the message sent to the right party. They would be very upset if they have to cut and past the senders e-mail address from the body text on every contact they receive.
    Their feeling is that if I can't find a way to make the contact form work the way it should, then it's useless to them.
    Can anyone help me figure this out? I really don't want to disappoint my first client.

    Are you on a plan that has the CRM feature that stores your customers' data? If so, the idea of the contact form is that you'll receive a notification that there's been an inquiry filled out on your contact form and there should be a link in that email notification that leads to the "Case" that was created when that customer filled out a contact form.  You can click that link and visit the case for that customer in your BC site and reply to them from there so that all of the correspondence is logged in the CRM for safe-keeping and for your records.
    If your client finds this is too much work to login to BC to reply every time, then you should check to see if you have the "Customer Service Ticketing" feature on your hosting plan.  This is a feature where you create a dedicated email account (like [email protected]) and the BC system will automatically login to that email account and pull any emails in that inbox and convert them to a customer case for the sender of the email and then it will send out a notification via email to any of the BC Admin users you delegate as "Customer Service Agents".  Since the CST integrates with the BC CRM it lets you reply directly within the email-- but when you reply it will be going to that same email address dedicated to the CST but once the CST service checks your email again and sees that you replied to this inquiry it will log your reply against the customer's case and sends your reply via email back to them so that all the correspondance gets logged on BC's CRM but you can still reply via email.
    There's no way to use the default web forms to update the "From" or "Reply-To" address.. it must come from an approved email address to avoid spam issues.  On most web services you cannot change the "from" address anyway but usually you can at least specify the "Reply-To" address so that when someone hits "reply" in their email client it will reply to whoever you setup as the "Reply-To" address.
    Here's some more information about CST: http://kb.worldsecuresystems.com/kb/customer-service-ticketing.html?bc-partner
    I don't think the CST feature is in the webMarketing BC plan-- I think it's only in the webCommerce plan so if you have less than an webCommerce plan you have to tell your client to reply through BC by clicking the link in the notification they get.  You can justify it by saying its one or two more steps but it keeps the entire convo on record in their CRM for easy referral later.

  • How to uninstall a third party home button widget from 5c ?

    Hey there
    I have just bought my wife a new 5C.
    Previous to this she had an iphone 4 that had a third party home button widget installed (due to the home button on the handset crapping out a while back)
    I have done a restore on the new 5c from the latest backup from the old 4 and the third party home button widget is now on the new phone. Obviously she doesnt need it as the home button on the 5c handset works fine (for now!)
    Can any one tell me how to get rid of it ? I cant figure it out for the life of me !
    Cheers guys.

    If it's Apple's built-in "widget", it is called "Assistive Touch" and can be found in the "Accessibility" settings.
    1) Open the "Settings" app
    2) Select "General"
    3) Select "Accessibility"
    4) Scroll to the bottom of the list, tap "Assistive Touch" and turn it off.
    5) The "widget" should now be gone!
    Enjoy the 5c! Which colour did you guys go for?

  • Cisco UCM with Third Party Contact Center Solution

    Hi all, hope everyone is well.
    Anyone out there running Cisco UCM with a third party contact center solution ? would love to hear your experience on this subject.
    Thanks in advance !!
    Danny

    I have not heard of any sucessful stories, which vendor are you considering and what would you not go with UCCE/UCCX?
    I used to work for Rockwell (Aspect today) which attempted to integrate their Business Contact Solution with CUCM (back on 3.3) and it worked OK for low volume calls, but never had any customer adoption.
    I have not heard of any other known ACD vendors integrating with CUCM.
    Chris

  • Is it still the case that the Muse CC Forms widget will not work properly unless you have Business Catalyst?

    I am looking into options for our next office website redesign.  We will definitely need a forms function.  I downloaded the Muse CC free trial and went through all of the tutorials.  The video on the forms (Contact Form) stated that the forms widget would not work or would not work properly if you do not have Business Catalyst.  I'm hoping that has changed since the video was created.
    Is this still true that you need to purchase the Business Catalyst product for Muse CC form widgets to work correcty??? 

    Piruki have you tried utilizing the Previous version option within the Creative Cloud Desktop application?  You can find additional details under the install Previous version section of CC desktop lists applications as "Up to Date" when not installed - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/aam-lists-removed-apps-date.html.

  • Third Party plugs don't seem to work on nodes

    I've got a node working with Logic 8 and it works great with the Logic plugs. I've tried several third party plugs and none of them work: Ozone, Trash, Vintage Warmer, Airwindows Iron Oxide. The manual says ". . . some Audio Unit effects may not support the Node functionality of Logic Pro." So do the developers now have to redesign their plugins somehow to make them work with nodes? Has anyone been able to get a third party plugin working on a node?

    The manual specifically states that third party plug-ins are supported. So Matrixx, it looks like you're using a G4 as your node which is what I was doing. Perhaps I need a more recent version of Vintage Warmer. Are you also using Logic plugs on the tracks that have VW? I'm wondering whether you can mix and match third party with logic plugs on the same track. Well, this is encouraging. I really want the Airwindows stuff to work and I've got the most recent versions there. Do you have Iron Oxide? have you tried any Airwindows plugs?

Maybe you are looking for