Time issue on 4215 sensor

Hi,
My 4215 sensor reports the correct time when issuing "show clock", but when alerts are displayed in VMS event viewer, the date is all wrong.
None of the other sensors does this, and the time on the VMS server is also correct
Please help.
Thanks

The following actions will help you maintain your sensor:
Create a service account.
You can use the service account when you need to work with the TAC to troubleshoot your sensor.
See Creating the Service Account, for the procedure.
You should back up a good configuration. If your current configuration becomes unusable, you can replace it with the backup version.
See Creating and Using a Backup Configuration File, for the procedure.
Save your backup configuration to a remote system.
Always back up your configuration before you do a manual upgrade. If you have auto upgrades configured, make sure you do periodic backups.

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Proximity Sensor during calls - Continued v2

    This thread is a continuation of Issue with Proximity Sensor during calls - Continued. which was getting too long and causing some browsers to time out. That thread has been locked and the last post links to this thread.
    See also the initial thread Issue with Proximity Sensor during calls
    Thank you.
    Apple Discussions Hosts

    rbrylawski wrote:
    Goflying wrote:
    mbassoc2003 wrote:
    I wish that were so. Then they would probably be taking prompter action. But the return rate three weeks in was substantially lower than most handsets at launch and only a quarter that of the 3GS. I suspect the return rate has remained incredibly low and the figures are further slewed down the way by the worldwide distribution that is now in the tens of millions.
    At 5% return rate on a product I understand that becomes a 'significant event' that becomes declarable to shareholders, so we know they haven't reached that milestone yet.
    a disclosable event is not triggered by a specific stock return level unless apple has entered into covenants re same. Suggest you take a look at sec rules for more info
    Still, unless you have insider knowledge, you don't know Apple's buying them back at record numbers. You may be guessing, but you likely don't have proof....
    agree. I don't have any proof whatsoever, just a strong gut feeling that all is very much not as rosy in cupertino as it might seem.
    For a company whose culture is steeped in phreakery, apple is showing an amazing inability to exert control.
    too many screw ups, too many loose ends, too many whacky hires, too many media backlashes - maybe the senior staff went into dumb-mode while steve was away for so long
    null

  • Issue with Proximity Sensor during calls - Continued.

    This thread is a continuation of Issue with Proximity Sensor during calls which was getting too long and causing some browsers to time out. The old thread has been locked and the last post links to this thread.
    Thank you.
    Apple Discussions Hosts

    I find it completely ludicrous that Apple can interject on this thread and say it's received too many posts and has to be shut down and a "new" thread started. Really now? Seriously? Couldn't they also simply pop in and post 'hi guys, we hear you and are working on it' ...or something to that effect? That's my main complaint really is the deafening silence. What they're basically telling us is to complain all we want, if we don't like the phone then return it for a refund ...that is if you still have your original defective phone, for all you that already swapped phones, you're beat and are stuck with our mistake for the next 2 years when you'll be upgrade eligible again. ...WOW, thanks for the statement without technically releasing one. ...I think we're all left in the dark because Apple really doesn't know what is going on with the sensor, they can't and or won't release a statement without getting the facts straight. ...but we all know one fact is straight...the sensor is dysfunctional and that alone deserves an acknowledgement. How are we to have faith in Apple to fix the issue when we're left to believe they don't think there is one.
    ...btw update on "my fix" ...deleting all your photos and putting the phone in your arm pit and then under your pillow is only a temporary solution, for mine sensor is on the fritz again. ...shaking my head, if only this were
    funny.

  • IPhone having issues with Proximity sensors

    I just got my new 5S with iOS 7.1.1 and occasionally when i answer a call and put the phone close to my ear the screen lags. It turns off and then back on and will do it a couple times before either staying off or sometimes on during a call. Not sure if this is an issue with the sensor on my phone specifically or if it's a software issue. I haven't yet taken it to apple as it isn't an emergency and I have no time to go to an Apple store. Is anyone else having this problem?

    Screen won't lock or go black when answering calls
    Verify mute or speaker have not been activated, just prior to placing your ear over the receiver.
    While on a call hold your hand over the top third of the display, and verify that the screen is locked or goes to sleep.
    Try turning iPhone off and then on again.

  • Time issue- urgnt

    HI Expert !
    I m using this code .
    LTIME TYPE SY-UZEIT
    T1 TYPE SY-UZEIT VALUE 030000,
    T2 TYPE SY-UZEIT VALUE 050000,
    BUT WHEN I M USING T1 AND T2  in loop ( if  statement ),ITS value r
    T1 =  082000.
    t2  = 131100 .
    if  t1(6)  t2(6 )
    ltime (6 ).
    then ok . but in this i wont be able to make comparison in if statement
    how i can resolve this time issue
    i dont want to include timings between 3.00 a.m and 5.00 ,
    for this i have used this code but its not updating data for any employee , is this code correct or not.
    OPEN DATASET PA_FILE FOR INPUT IN TEXT MODE ENCODING DEFAULT.
    DO.
    READ DATASET PA_FILE INTO REC.
    CLEAR WA_PUNCHES.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    EXIT.
    ENDIF.
    WRITE: / REC.
    if NOT ( WA_SCORE-LTIME GE T1 AND WA_SCORE-LTIME LE T2 ) .
    AND
    ***( WA_SCORE-TERID NE TR3 AND
    ***WA_SCORE-TERID NE TR4 AND
    ***WA_SCORE-TERID NE TR5 AND
    ***WA_SCORE-TERID NE TR6 AND
    ***WA_SCORE-TERID NE TR7 AND
    ***WA_SCORE-TERID NE TR8 ) .
    WA_SCORE-PERNR = REC+0(8) .
    WA_SCORE-LDATE = REC+9(8) .
    WA_SCORE-LTIME = REC+18(6) .
    WA_SCORE-CANID = REC+25(8) .
    WA_SCORE-TERID = REC+34(4) .
    APPEND WA_SCORE TO IT_SCORE.
    ELSE .
    EXIT .
    ADD 1 TO COUNT.
    ENDIF .
    ENDDO.
    plz help me . its very imp. program .
    thanks

    Hi,
    Pass values in quotes
    T1 TYPE SY-UZEIT VALUE '030000',
    T2 TYPE SY-UZEIT VALUE '050000',
    Can you please check once again after making this change in debug mode, values of T1, T2 and LTIME.
    ashish

  • Time issue seems odd to me

    I put a secondary domain and po at a remote location - running 8.03 on Sles/Oes and moved all of the "local" users to that po.
    while everything seems to run ok we have a weird time issue.
    Mail into and out of the new mailboxes shows a three and a half hour time difference both in the date column in the groupwise client and in the printed header of the email.
    The odd thing is that if I go to the properties of the email - the Creation date and the File date and time are both correct.
    I can't see any time issues with the servers (primary or secondary) and especially something that would be 3:30 minutes off
    there is a timezone difference between the pri and sec but that's just 1 hour.
    Any thoughts?
    As a workaround I have had my users add the creation column to see when they actually received the email as our clients have time critical projects.
    Thanks
    Dennis

    Danita,
    Thanks for the reply - Oh how I wish it were that easy - I've checked and double checked the PO object and the domain object - both say US eastern time.
    If I send email from a mailbox on the secondary to the primary - everything is correct (a 1 hour time difference - Eastern to Central)
    If I send mail from a mailbox on the primary to the secondary - it shows up right away, but says 3:30 minutes later than it should (in Date/Time, but not in Created)
    If I send email from a mailbox on the secondary to a GMail account - the header shows the 3:30 offset, but the properties of the mail shows correctly.
    I would be happy to send email from that po to anyone that wants to see for themselves.
    Other than the PO Object and the DOM object - Where should I be looking for a time difference
    and how would it be getting UTC minus 30 minutes - - Is there a special timezone out there for Hy Brasil?
    The workstations all get their time settings from "time.windows.com" the windows default.
    Thanks for looking into this - I just hope that I can get it figured out because as small of an issue that I think it is (they get their email, it just looks like it gets read before they officially receive it)
    but it seems that this office uses the received time to track how long it takes them to do their work.
    Dennis

  • Real time issue

    Hi all,
    Can any body plz send me some FICO real time issue on [email protected]
    and plz tell me hw shld I prepare for interview
    Thanks & Regards
    Vaibhav

    Hi Balraj,
    In the normal practice, developers will try to find the similer infocube (as per the requirement) in the Business content. But always you will not be lucky to find such infocube in Business content. You need to create at your own to suite the business requirements. Regarding the characteristcs & key figure, it 's again depend on the requirements. Calculated object can be assign as key figure like. Sales qty, revenue & net sales etc. where as Dimesion (characteritcs) will be purely depends on the reporting point of view. Like Customer, Material & Sales Document type etc.
    Hope this will help you !
    Thanks,
    Sanjiv

  • Execution Time Issue

    Help Please!!!
    I've been searching for an execution time issue in our application for a while now. Here is some background on the application:
    Collects analog data from a cDAQ chassis with a 9205 at 5kHz
    Data is collected in 100ms chunks
    Some of the data is saved directly to a TDMS file while the rest is averaged for a single data point. That single data point is saved to disk in a text file every 200ms.
    Problem: During operation, the VI that writes the data to the text file will periodically take many hundreds of milliseconds to execute. Normal operation execution times are on the order of 1ms or less. This issue will happen randomly during operation. It's usually many seconds between times that this occurs and it doesn't seem to have any pattern to when the event happens.
    Attached is a screenshot of the VI in question. The timing check labeled "A" is the one that will show the troubling execution time. All the other timing checks show 0ms every time this issue occurs. I simply can't see what else is holding this thing up. The only unchecked subVI is the "append error call chain" call. I've gone through the heirarchy of that VI and ensured that everything is set for reentrant execution. I will check that too soon, but I really don't expect to find anything.
    Where else can I look for where the time went? It doesn't seem to make sense.
    Thanks for reading!
    Tim
    Attachments:
    Screen Shot 2013-09-06 at 9.32.46 AM.png ‏87 KB

    You should probably increase how much data you write with a single Write to Text File.  Move the Write to Text File out of the FOR loop.  Just have the data to be written autoindex to create an array of strings.  The Write to Text File will accept the array of strings directly, writing a single line for each element in the arry.
    Another idea I am having is to use another loop (yes another queue as well) for the writing of the file.  But you put the Dequeue Element inside of another WHILE loop.  On the first iteration of this inside loop, set the timeout to something normal or -1 for wait forever.  Any further iteration should have a timeout of 0.  You do this with a shift register.  Autoindex the read strings out of the loop.  This array goes straight into the Write to Text File.  This way you can quickly catch up when your file write takes a long time.
    NOTE:  This is just a very quick example I put together. It is far from a complete idea, but it shows the general idea I was having with reading the queue.
    There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
    Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
    Attachments:
    Write all data on queue.png ‏16 KB

  • Time issues? time zone settings appear in two places

    If you leave the default "set time and date automatically", you see the time zone support below and you can check it or uncheck. You can then set your time zone there. But if you uncheck the automatic date and time, you get another time zone choice and the default is Cupertino, of course. I wonder if that's the problem with some of these time issues.
    I've since unchecked automatic date and time, set my city's time zone, then rechecked automatic. The only weirdness I've seen was with an excel spreadsheet where the time was correctly shown on my mac, but not on the iphone. Unfortunately I don't have that sheet anymore or I'd try again to see if it works now.
    Just a thought.

    I noticed the same thing and did the same thing you did because my time was off by several hours each time I turned the phone on...after it being off overnight. When it was off by only 1 hour I could turn the Auto OFF then 'tap' the timezone (already set to the correct city) and the time would instantly correct itself. Then I'd turn Auto back ON.
    Turns out that my time issue was related to having the SIM PIN enabled. Once I disabled that, the time's been correct every day.

  • Real  time issues

    hi there,
    can any one share some of the issues that have been dealt with in real time. i.e.during blue print stage, <b>especially in realisation stage</b>, final preparation stage
    puhlease answer this question immediately

    Hi Medasani,
    Real time issue you can get it from the Sap support consultants. Hence, getting all the information is very difficult.
    In what basis you are asking let me your requirements.
    For Example :- Tolerance limits is has to increase to Rs.1 to Rs.100. for employees and vendor / customer. This is the issue from client.
    How you will decide that to increase.
    First you should understand the clinet work flow and get the approval from client end (core Team) then you have to increase meanwhile you have to decide the % also.
    Oba3 /Oba2
    Warm Regards,
    Sivakumar Sathiyamoorthy

  • [SOLVED] Yet another time issue...

    Hi there,
    I'm having some crazy, hair pulling, head banging UTC time issues on both my dual boot (Arch & Windows 8) desktop and single boot laptop.
    I've been searching and following a mulitude of old threads and the official Wiki guide, however, I simply cannot get UTC time to stay correct between reboots. I've installed Arch a fair few times now, both before and after the switch to systemd and in dual and single boot setups and have never had time related issues like this before...
    Here's a run down of the whole sorry story....
    Fresh install - set time with hwclock --systohw utc as suggested in the beginners guide.
    First boot - time an hour out - huh? cat /etc/adjtime and ls -l /etc/localtime - everything as it should be... UTC and symlink to /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/London. Nonetheless I duly follow the Time guide on the wiki, get to know timedatectl a bit, and soon after, time is set to be correct. Great.
    Reboot. Time an hour out. Whaaaa??. Start googling, finding a plethora of bbs links to others with similar issues, decide to use NTP. Install, ntpd -qg. All good again. Time right. Phew...
    Reboot. Nope. Arrrrgggghhhh. (Bare in mind - at this point I haven't even booted the Windows 8 disc, and I went through the exact same process on my Arch only laptop...)
    More googling, thread reading. Find out that hwclock and ntp might be in conflict. Delete /etc/adjtime, reinstall tzdata, re-follow Time article to the letter and reenable NTP to start at boot.
    Reboot - time is foward an hour yet again. Bang head repeatedly on desk. Then suddenly - 10 mins or so after boot - NTP kicks in, and time is magically goes back an hour to the correct time! Surely NTP should be doing this early in the boot process, not 10 minutes after? But OK, at least something is happening...
    Next I dare to boot into Windows, and yup, time an hour out. Expected, but frustrating nonetheless. Add the registry tweak as suggested in the guide, and turn off the Windows time synchronisation. During which I noticed that Windows 8 time is set to UTC by default, not localtime, which is what the wiki says. Is this a Windows 8 thing?
    I can't help thinking, that if this is the case, and the Wiki advise is written under the assumption that Windows time is always localtime, that perhaps this is the route of my problem....
    Anyway, Windows time all good now, reboot Arch, time again wrong untill NTP finally kicks in - sigh. Reboot to Windows. Time an hour back. Gaaaahhhh - WTF?!! reset it to be correct. Try again. Same thing. Oops, forgot to mention that on each reboot, I check the BIOS clock, which remains persistently correct during the whole debarkle...
    Ok, so I try without the registry hack and turn Windows sync back on. Still fucked. I try various combinations of the two, I try resetting Arch time over and over again. With NTP - late sync. With hwclock only, or both hwclock & NTP - totally fucked! Eventually, I give up on UTC in Arch, set it localtime, delete registry key, turn Windows time sync back on, and thus far all good......
    TL;DR - couldn't get hwclock to set UTC time correctly across reboots. NTP worked (sort of), but after each reboot it would take ten minutes for the time to sync and the clock to move back an hour to the correct time. Localtime just works...
    My question is - why is the wiki (and the timedatectl status output for that matter) - so adamant that we should use UTC? From what I can gather, as long as I boot Windows around the DST time. or manually move the clock forward or back an hour - all should be well, no? Or are there other issues that I may run into that I've missed? The thing I'm most concerned about is data corruption due to timestamp issues...
    Also, why does the wiki repeatedly say that Windows uses localtime, when this doesn't appear to be the case in Eight? Does the wiki need updating or is Windows lying to me? I know which I'd put my money on ;-)
    Finally can anyone explain why my time was always an hour forward after a reboot, even when the time was set correctly before, the BIOS showed the correct time, and NTP was in use?
    Sorry for the crazy long posting, but this issue has been driving me totally batty!! Any light-shedding greatfully appreciated :-)
    Last edited by knowayhack (2013-08-10 15:24:09)

    Ok, so I set the clock back an hour in the BIOS, booted Windows - time right - YAY.
    Rebooted Arch - time right. OMFG - pure joy!!!
    I have to say, I still find it odd that this is how it works, and would like to confirm that things are looking as they should in the output from the following commands....
    toby@archy ~ > timedatectl status
          Local time: Sat 2013-08-10 15:42:56 BST
      Universal time: Sat 2013-08-10 14:42:56 UTC
            Timezone: Europe/London (BST, +0100)
         NTP enabled: n/a
    NTP synchronized: no
    RTC in local TZ: no
          DST active: yes
    Last DST change: DST began at
                      Sun 2013-03-31 00:59:59 GMT
                      Sun 2013-03-31 02:00:00 BST
    Next DST change: DST ends (the clock jumps one hour backwards) at
                      Sun 2013-10-27 01:59:59 BST
                      Sun 2013-10-27 01:00:00 GMT
    toby@archy ~ > sudo hwclock --debug
    sudo: timestamp too far in the future: Aug 10 16:39:24 2013
    We trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System
    Administrator. It usually boils down to these three things:
        #1) Respect the privacy of others.
        #2) Think before you type.
        #3) With great power comes great responsibility.
    [sudo] password for toby:
    hwclock from util-linux 2.23.2
    Using /dev interface to clock.
    Last drift adjustment done at 1376148264 seconds after 1969
    Last calibration done at 1376148264 seconds after 1969
    Hardware clock is on UTC time
    Assuming hardware clock is kept in UTC time.
    Waiting for clock tick...
    ...got clock tick
    Time read from Hardware Clock: 2013/08/10 14:43:20
    Hw clock time : 2013/08/10 14:43:20 = 1376145800 seconds since 1969
    Sat 10 Aug 2013 15:43:20 BST  -0.953640 seconds
    Is it OK to now reinstall NTP to keep the clock in sync on Arch, and are the Windows reg tweaks still necessary on Windows 8?
    Thank you guys SOOO much for all the unbelievabley speedy help on this issue - you have no idea how much this has been stressing me out!!
    Last edited by knowayhack (2013-08-10 14:54:31)

  • Communication channel availablity time issue

    Hi All,
    We want to schdule communication channel every  mid night ,but when i tried to give the time there is a diffrence of about 6 hours .so evry time if in need to schdule need to calculate and schdule the time ,checked out the server timing it is similar to system time ,even messages in MONI also showing the correct time ,do we need to check anything in the adpter engine to correct this time diffrence.
    Appreciate reply on this.
    Thanks,
    Madhu

    Madhu
    Iu2019m not sure if this is exactly your issue, but please see the following links concerning time issue in XI.
    Time setting is differnt in sxmb_moni and RWB
    Different time stamp in sxmb_moni and RWB
    Hope this helps.
    PJ

  • SEM-BPS Real times issues

    Hi Gurus,
    I'm new to SEM-BPS Real times issues also some interview questions on SEM BPS. How we want to answer please forward to my email id: [email protected]
    thank regards
    Suresh

    Have you tried posting to th eBusiness Planning forum which is focused on SEM/BPS?  It's under the Business Intelligence category.

  • Please tell me some real time issues faced by u in SCRIPTS

    please tell me some real time issues faced by u in ur experience

    First understand SAP scripts are client dependent..changes automatically not reflects in all development client once it is change in once client.
    We mostly see alignment issue in SAP script it is mostly because of printer settings etc...
    Also we may have few problems when printing unicode characters.. for printing double digits characters... like Japanese, chinese, korean etc.. we should have a printer with unicode enabled..
    Regards,
    SaiRam

  • Real time issues faced during Sap Implementation.

    Hi All,
    Please let me know some real time issues faced during SAP end to end implementation. Hw did u get over the issues.
    Issues faced during Production Support.
    I have an F2F interview. Please help me out.
    Regards,
    Somya

    Hi,
       This is Srinivas If u dont mine can u help me in Sending me the solutions to me what type of issues we will face in sap/bw implementation like issues and defeacts  can u send to my mail  [email protected]  can u give me solution for error9,error8,return8 can able to plz help me .
    Regards,
    Vasu.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I turn off the Gloss Optimizer on my Espon when printing PDFs?

    I am using a Mac Pro with Mountain Lion and the Adobe CS6 package that came with Adobe Acrobat X (version 10.1.3). As with the other programs in CS6, when I print I cannot turn off the Gloss Optimizer. I used one cartridge in on day. Expensive to say

  • Using cursor function in sql statement

    hi all can anyone plss explain why and when we will use cursor function in a sql statement like this and what is the difference while executing this sql statement with cursor function in comparison of a simple sql statement---- select department_name

  • Balance Carry-Forward Problem for Subledger Accounts

    Hi Experts, We are doing the Balance Carry-Forward this Year 2012 and we are having problems with the amount to be carry-over of AP/AR Subledgers for this year. We checked the C/F Balance for G/L and there are no problems. When I go to tables KNC1 or

  • Topic: How to obtain entity manager in application server?

    Hey, How to obtain Entity manger in application server ? The class is a simple class (no Ejb), and i can call to this class from Ejb or from inner schdeuler process (not container management) I want that if i call to this calss from Ejb , that the en

  • Removing invoice block at line-item level

    Hello SAP gurus I've been asked by a client to create a way to delete invoice blocks at a line item level via workflow.  The workflow sends a workitem for each blocked line-item that the invoice has.  What I need to do now is create custom code that