TMS QA in a Four-system landscape

Hello,
Today we use a standard R\3 system landscape (Dev->Qua->Prod) with a TMS QA installed on the Qua system. We would like to add a fourth system (called Vma). Actually, this system is another consolidation system that should work in parallel with the current Qua.
All Transport Requests (TR) transport in Qua must be transported in Vma too. We would like that the TMS QA manage all TR from VM6 and CM6. It means that a TR must be approved in Qua AND in Vma before going to Prod. Is it technically feasible to manage 2 systems in parallel through the TMS QA?
Thanks in advance for any answer\suggestions on this topic.

Hi Olivier,
as I know this is not possible, you can only define one system as the QA system. You have the possibility to add an additional approval step e.g. Tested in Vma or an other opportunity would be to use the Transport Workflow.
Regards
Tahran

Similar Messages

  • ChaRM with 4 system Landscape.

    Hi,<br />
    We are trying to implement ChaRM in a four system landscape <br />
    <br />
    AFD --&gt; AFQ --&gt; AFI --&gt; AFP<br />
    <br />
    defined logical components, project, created maintenance cycle. U'gent correction works fine.<br />
    <br />
    but for regular correction, we are able to create TRs release it, but not getting imported into AFQ and of course further steps are not happening. When the status is "Development Completed", we perform "Log on to system", this pops up with a dialogue with options<br />
    <br />
    AFQ           200<br />
    AFI             100<br />
    <br />
    to logon to system.<br />
    <br />
    This is the only clue we got.   <br />
    <br />
    When we perform the actions, the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production". It doesn't obey the phases maintenance cycle as well, irrespective of the phases the status keeps changing and goes to status "Production"<br />
    We are missing some minor thin's.<br />
    <br />
    Have we defined the system roles properly? IF not, how does the flow works perfectly fine with respect to U'gent correction.<br />
    <br />
    Please help.<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    Regards,<br />
    Ragu<br />
    <br />

    Hi Ragu,
    I have a few questions here:
    1. What normal correction type are you using - SDMI or SDMJ
    2. What roles are assigned to the systems in Logical Components? I believe they are setup as Target Systems and thats why you get the pop-up with both systems when you execute 'Logon action' after 'Development Completed'
    3. What is the STMS setup for this landscape?
    4. Urgnt should behave properly coz it takes the shortest route to production. Can you check the tasklist of Urgnt and see if there are only 3 systems there?
    Regards,
    Kriti Bhalla

  • 3 system and 4 system landscape - Charm

    Dear All,
    We have 3 system landsacpe for ECC and 4 System Landscape for BI?
    Is it possible to configure CHaRM for these landscape?
    If yes, please give me step by step guidelines.
    How to create Maintenance Cycle?
    Raj

    Hi Raj,
    This is possible. The three system landscape is the usual scenario. In four system landscap, you just need to add a pre-production system in your landscape.
    Go to the Wiki http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SM/Weblogs%20related%20to%20Solution%20Manager and search for Change Request Management. There are some 10 docs available there. Specifically have a look on
    First steps to work with Change Request Management scenario
    /people/dolores.correa/blog/2008/07/26/first-steps-to-work-with-change-request-management-scenario
    Call service.sap.com/rkt-solman. You can find the materials for project prepration, corrections etc.
    Call SPRO in your solman system and go through the documentation provided there.
    This will give you adequate information for configuring ChaRM.
    Rajeev

  • Transportmanagemt for 2 systems landscape

    Hello!
    I am about to set up the client dependent TMS for  the following 2 systems landscape:
    system FID: client 100 (Customizing) , client 200 (Test)
    system FIP: client 100 (Productive client)
    In my current solution I put the transport target group between the two systems, so I can send the transports to the several clients.
    Now I would like to replace transport target group with the client dependent transport routes:
    consolidation route: ZFID --> 200
    consolidation route: SAP --> 200
    (both for the transport from FID 100 to FID 200)
    delivery route: Delivery 200 --> 100
    (route from FID 200 to the FIP 100)
    My goal is to develop in client 100 (FID), to test in client 200 (FID), and if everything ok, to transport to the client 100 (FIP).
    <b>My question: Can I apply the second solution in order to realize better my goal?</b>Which advantages/disadvantages has the second solution

    Hi Thom,
    I guess the advantage is with your second solution that you have something more like a traditional three-system-landscape.  However because your development and test clients are on the same instance you're introducing some additional admin by applying transports for development objects (that are almost entirely client independent) back into 200, which really you don't need.
    I feel the volume and type of transport you typically do will influence if the second solution is worthwhile.  If you make lots of development changes you're probably best staying as you are.  If your changes are mostly config, the change is worthwhile.
    Regards,
    Nick

  • Using TMS for setup system landscape

    Hello everyone,
    I'd like to setup system landscape (tr SMSY_setup) by using TMS and when i'm doing schedule data transfer from TMS/SLD  background job is being canceled.
    i'm recieving message "The SLD server connection is inactive" and dump "UNCAUGHT_EXCEPTION" there is. Why? I'm not using SLD.
    regards,
    Denis

    Hi,
    What do you mean by setup SMSY using TMS?
    SMSY is getting all your system information like Add-on componenes, clients, hardware details, which the TMS cannot give. Understand the need for SMSY.
    Feel free to revert back.
    --Ragu

  • TMS 3 system Landscap problem

    Hi All,
    I have configured 3 system landscape (DV1, DEV, VED).  Here, DV1 is the Domain controller (win2003, MSSQL, 4.6c), DEV is the Quality system (Win2003, MSSQL, ECC6) and VED is the production system (Win2003, MSSQL, ECC6).
    I have successfully configured the TMS and Check is done without errors. I have used three systems in a group to establish route. Transport layer is ZDV1. Now the problem is, whenever I release transport request from DV1( domain controller), It is not appearing in the DEV (quality ) system.
    Can you please tell me where I have gone wrong?

    Arun,
    you could check the following:
    Under Configuration Status, are all three systems activated?
    Under Transport Routes, do you see both DEV and VED?
    Make sure you have saved, activated and distributed the new model after your change.
    Also - as an outside shot, if the transport request(s) were created before you configured TMS, check the Target System for that particular transport(s) and ensure that it is DEV.

  • Automatic Transport Mechanism to four systems in same landscape

    Hi,
    We have come across a requirement where we need to transport a request to four systems instead of traditional three.
    The systems involved are - DEV (Development), QAS (Quality), PRD (Production) and TRG Training).
    Currently the transport route is setup for three systems and we need to add the fourth one - Training system. The solution we are looking for is once the request is imported in Production it should be imported automatically in Training system, without any manual intervention.
    The version being used in ERP 5.0.
    Any input in this reagrd is much appreciated.
    Regards,
    Rajeev

    Hi,
    You can configure the transport route accordingly
    Then Click on the system where you want to schedule the auto import job (Training System ). Once you are in the import queue of that system (Tranining ), click on import all request (Big truck). After choose option - at start time and give a period say from today 7 AM and then choose the period option like (every 15 mins) and save this. It will release a periodic job running every 15 mins in your system with the name TMS_00000000XXTMS_TP_IMPORT.

  • Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape

    Hello
    I have created systems in system landscape, TMS is working fine, all the configuration steps are completed successfully.
    am working in Solution Manager 4, in project change -SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN - Project Administration - in 'System Landscape' tab &#61664; Change request  and when I activate change request management I am getting following messages:
    1. Warning: Problems occurred during synchronization of the system landscape
    2. The project is not released. Hence cycle can not be created.
    Its bit urgent as I m in middle of this activity, please assist me on the same…
    Thanks
    Sharmishtha

    Hello Jason & Prakhar
    Thanks for your quick response. I am basis person, and configuring this change request management for one of the project.
    Jason:
    Will you please check with your basis person about these settings and let me know the same. I have set the settings as follows
    C= Development (source system)
    T = Quality
    P = Production
    Prakhar:
    I have checked with all RFC connections are working fine, authorizations are also properly given.
    I didn’t get your point No correctly defined maintenance project exists, I have already created project in project administration transaction, assigned the system landscape, I have activated project IMG in IMG Project and then going in change request tab to activate the change request management, where its giving me above error.
    More over, as you have mentioned I am getting following message in SLG1:
    “Project CHARM_GBW not found in the project administration table”
    This is asking me to do following things:
    Synchronize the project in Change Manager with the Solution Manager. Call the Solution Manager with the transaction SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN, and go to the 'System Landscape' tab, and then the 'Project Cycle' tab. Select the 'Change Request Management' field, and choose 'Refresh'. Project CHARM_GBW should then be available.
    Where do I have to make entry for this?  I can see the entry in /TMWFLOW/PROJMAP table too. I don’t know what more I need to do for this.
    Problem is I can’t see ‘Project Cycle’ tab in ‘System Landscape’.  Prakhar, frankly I am not able to find any step wise document on this part. So will you please help me with some documents on this? I am from technical side thus there is bit difficulty to understand this scenario from functional view.
    I will be grateful for your help,
    Thanks
    Sharmishtha

  • ChaRM - Mainenance Cycle in two system landscape - possible?

    Hi Experts,
    we are trying to create a maintenace cycle with two systems.
    We have a system defined as "Evaluation System" and the second is defined as "Production System".
    Generally Question
    Is it possible to create a maintenace cycle for a two-system-scenario?
    Specific Question - Erorrs/Warnings
    While checking the project we got several errors/problems:
    1 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_CHARM_BASICFUNC_001 and database
    2 Differences between BC Set SOLMAN40_SDESK_BASICFUNC_000 and database
    3 No consolidation system found for EID-800 (project Z_CRM_T)
    4 No track for project Z_CRM_T with log. system EID/800
    5 Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for CBI-001
    CTS
    The transport system is configured correct - Check in STMS is OK
    Question:
    The comparison checks seem to be OK - is it necessary to reactivate the BC Sets?
    Kind regards
    Tom

    Hi,
    the system role for your client/systems in the logical component is very important:
      - The development system needs to be defined as a Source System.
      - If you don't have a QA, leave all target systems empty. If there are one or more consolidation/integration/regression systems, assign them to system role Target System.
      - Your production system uses system role Production System.
    The defined Development client needs a client dependent (TMS parameter CTC=1) consolidation track to the QA, or in a 2 Tier landscape to the production system. In a 3 Tier landscape you need a delivery track from QAS client to your production client. But as you wrote, TMS has been set up already. I just would like to mention all steps....
    Check that all RFC connections have been set up correctly. Especially the Trusted RFC. Don't forget the Trusted RFC to client 000 ot the TMs domain controller.
    In tab Systems ( transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape ):
    Make sure you see all clients of your logical component. If not hit button System Role Assignment and add your System role.
    Then still in the same tab: Hit button Shipment Routes and make sure, you see the complete transport track and only this track here!
    After correct setup of TMS, RFCs, logical components and assignment of LC to your project:
    First perform a Refresh and a Check in transaction code SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN => System Landscape => Change Requests. Then please recreate the maintenance cycle (and task list).
    Regards,
    Holger

  • 4 System Landscape // ChaRM // No Export System found

    Hi Folks,
    I got some problems with a 4 system landscape in ChaRM.
    The error message I get when doing a consistency check within my SMI project is:
    Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for NWA-303
    Message no. /TMWFLOW/TRACK_N159
    Transport route should be as follows:
    DEV -> QAS -> INT -> PRD
    Since I am still in testing phase I used clients instead of real systems in my configuration (TMS, Logical component,....)
    My configuration looks like this:
    NWA client 300 -> 301, transport layer ZCHM, transport layer SAP, consolidation
    NWA client 301 -> 302, delivery
    NWA client 302 -> 303, delivery
    Logical Component defined as follows:
    Developement System (Source: SAP): NWA:300
    Type of Role: D Source System
    Quality Assurance System (Source: SAP): NWA:301
    Type of Role:  O Target System
    Integration System (Source: User): NWA:302
    Type of Role:  O Target System
    Production System (Source: SAP): NWA:303
    Type of Role:  P Production System
    Anyone got an idea what is wrong? did I miss anything?
    The same configuration works for a 3-tier Landscape (without Integration System).
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hi Raquel,
    Ours problems with RFC and with connections had be corrected with the note below:
    1833778 - Activate Change Request management - Check error
    Thank you very much!!
    Adriana

  • Track for 4 system landscape

    Hi,
    Our system landscape including Dev, Stress,QA and Production systems and we want to define runtime systems for a track by defining four systems. So, that we can transport our Software Component from DEV > Stress > Test > Production.
    In NWDI there are only three options to add runtime systems (DEV/Test/Prod) for single track.
    Can any one please tell me, if there is some option to define our fourth system as runtime system for same track?
    Thanks & Regards
    Srinivas.

    Hi Kenny,
    wow, don't bring the hard stuff out.
    To answer the question:
    With the so-called "track connections" you can design your transport landscape in any possible way. No matter if you have two, three, four or twenty NW AS Java that need to be covered.
    For info regarding track connections have a look at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/13/602b27f6fb41b4a9eb4f72eabb9832/frameset.htm.
    Best regards,
    Timo

  • Charm configuration for a 4 system landscape

    Hi Experts,
    We are planning to implement charm for a 4 system landscape: Development Server, Integration Server, Quality Server and Production Server.
    We could configure TMS related steps, activated Charm in Solution Manager, created a maintenance project in solar_project_admin.
    However, the standard delivered transaction types like Normal correction and Urgent Correction are not working in a 4 system landscape.  They are only working for 3 systems (DEV, QAS and PRD).
    Are there any documents or blogs that would specially explain all the steps required for 4 systems? Any kind of help would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Ravali

    Development --> Integration --> Quality --> Production.
    First, I will import the transport of copies into integration
    Yes, and you test the changes here.
    Second, the whole transport is released and imported to Integration - in the Test phase of the maintenance cycle and NC status being consolidated.
    Third - Now, keeping the maintenance cycle in the TEST phase and NC phase in consolidated, will I be able to schedule the transport into quality server?
    Nope. You consolidate your normal correction, which releases your original transport and import them into Integration, and then immediately into Quality (you already proved it worked in Integration) BEFORE you set the phase to Test. Otherwise the original transports are NOT released. And if you set your phase to Test before importing the originals, you'll get a message that you cannot import transports into Quality during this phase.
    If you need to get transports into Quality for break fixes during the Test phase you need to use a Test Message and these are imported during Go-live as well.
    Fourth - if the above process works, I will then change the MC to Go Live and schedule the import to Production.
    With the corrected process mentioned above, yes, you will then change the phase to Go-live and it will import everything that was brought into Quality. 
    Hope this helps.

  • CHARM with  a 2 system landscape

    Hello ,
    we have only a 2 system landscape for our ERP systems.
    When I now click on the check button on the maintainance project. I receive an error :
    No consolidation system found for DEV-001 (project TEST_CHARM)
    No track for project TEST_CHARM with log. system P23/001
    Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for DEV-001
    TMS ( without any client  routes)
    DEV->PROD
    Any suggestions ?
    Regards

    Hi Daniel,
    we are using CHaRM in various transport landscapes with 2 and up to 5 systems. This is all working fine. Please make sure there is a consolidation transport route from DEV, also all RFC connections from Solution Manager to your Transport Landscape are set up, inlcuding 000 clients.
    TMS settings need CTC=1, and Trusted Services in STMS need to be activated.
    Other prerequsites are:
    - Systems are deined in SMSY
    - Transport Domain link between Transport domain controllers
    - Logical components defined in SMSY (with correct system roles)
    - Lofical component added to SMI project
    If this is all fine, please hit button "Shipment Routes" in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN in tab page "System Landscape" => "Systems" You should see all transport routes required for this project.
    If this works, you are in a good shape.
    Best Regards,
    Holger Slomka

  • CHaRM 2 system landscape possible??

    Hi Solman experts,
    I have a question. Is CHaRM possible in a 2 system landscape without creating extra clients? For example:
    BWDEV100 -
    >DWPRD100
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ricky

    Hi Avinash,
    But in TMS do you create one delivery transport route from dev100 to prod100 or do you create a consolidation route to prod100. Usually in a three system landscap you create 2 consolidation routes to the test system one with a transport layer that you created and one with the sap transport layer and then one delivery route to the production system.
    Could you please explain what kind of transport route you create?
    Thanks in advance.

  • Transport target group and routes setting for 2 system landscape

    Hi!
    I have 2 system landscape (DEV with 2 Clients, 100 CUST and 200 TEST and PRD with productvie client 100).
    Currently I have the standard TMS configuration for 2 systems (with tranport layers/routes ZDEV and SAP) .
    Now I  have to set up my TMS settings client specific
    (Development in DEV 100 and transport to the DE 200 TEST and PRD 100).
    I have created tranport target group /B-DEV/ with both target goals:
    DEV 200 and PRD 100.
    <b>What are the further settings for transport routes?
    I assume, I have to delete the existing routes ZDEV and SAP?
    what are the next steps? </b>
    Thank you very much
    regards

    Ok, I have in DEV system:
    Client 100 (Customizing)
    Client 200 (Test) (it can be considered as replacement of QAS-system, because we only have 2 systems)
    PRD system
    Client 100 (Productive client)
    So we would like to set up the transport management system client specific, in order to develop in DEV 100 to test in DEV 200 and to use the transports in PRD 100.
    Thank you very for your help
    regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I omit headers and footers in conversion?

    Hi everyone, I am having problems with footers and headers each time I convert from pdf to Word using Adobe ExportPDF. It is an excellent program, but I have a problem. I follow the instructions and the pdf converts to Word fine, but the converted te

  • I am frustrated because I can no longer go from advertisement in my game to that exact App in the store.  It just shows generic Apps.

    While playing a game I sometimes see a new game or App that I would like.  When I click (or touch) on it it used to take me to the store and right to the new App.  Now though it just goes to generic apps that I don't wish to sort through.  Is there a

  • Discount in pricing for total amount sales order

    Hi developpers, You know a standard procedure for calculate, a particular discount for sold to party, with relation to the total amount of sales order. Thanks in advance Domenico

  • How to overide Slider a function ?

    Hi, I'm trying to override a slider function, but I get an error : "Namespace was not found or is not a compile-time constant: Code: // ActionScript file package  {     import mx.controls.sliderClasses.Slider;     import mx.core.UIComponent; use name

  • Select in From-Clause with JPQL

    Hey, I'm new to JPA development. How can I transform the following SQL-Statement: select a from Gpsj a, (select c.tsid, c.wsid, max(c.gdat1) maxgdat from Gpsj c where c.tsid = '901' group by tsid, wsid) b where a.tsid = b.tsid and a.wsid = b.wsid and