Transaction code J1IH other adjustment accounting entries

Hi,
While doing excise JV tranaction code J1IH other adjustment the system showing below accounting entries if tick the determine gl account
Excise duty paid A/c
To SEC payable on excise duty
To Excise duty payable-ExGrp
To ECS payable on excise duty
the above entry at time of saving its posting the below accounting entries
Excise duty paid
To PLA-SEC-
To PLA-BED
To PLA-ECs.
Can any body suggest me for the above acocunting entries.
Thanks
Ram

Hi Prashant
You need to check the excise balance for your company code Excise Group. Chances might be there for another company code and excise group cennvate balance are there for company code for which you are carrying J1iH is 0.
Regards
Vivek Sharma
-- Reward if helpful !!

Similar Messages

J1IH - Other Adjustment

I want to debit the excise duty using J1IH OTHER ADJUSTMENT. I have sufficient balance in cenvat accounts for the same. while debiting the duty the excise account balance is showing nil balance.
I have debited the duty before using this transation. This problem is faced from last 3 days for one company code. For other company the transaction the transaction is running ok.
please help
regards
Prashant

Hi Prashant
You need to check the excise balance for your company code Excise Group. Chances might be there for another company code and excise group cennvate balance are there for company code for which you are carrying J1iH is 0.
Regards
Vivek Sharma
-- Reward if helpful !!

J1ih- Other adjustment balances are negative.....

Hi ,
We are getting one problem and in J1IH - Other adjustment Display balances it is showing negative balance and hence it is changing the GL to PLA when saving the document.
OK
But we have sufficient balances in GL becaz in J2i9 and J2iern it is showing sufficient balances.
Even though it is showing Negative balances in J1ih ...
Why?
Please help.
Thanks
Prasad

Hi ,
Please check whether GL Balances are carryforwarded or not, if the balances are not carryforwarded please carryforward through F.16.
After balances carryforwarded, please check once again through J1IH now balances will appear in postive.
Regards,
Rama Mohan Bangaru

J1iH - Other Adjustment ( RG23C)

Hi All ,
Accounting enteries are not moving to CENVAT ON HOLD account(50%) for RG23C while doing MRDY (Other adjustment) in J1IH.
I checked the enteries in "Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction" ......."ONHOLD CENVAT on Hold Account" set as credit for MRDY ETT.
In "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction", correct GL has been assigned under "CENVAT OH" heading for MRDY for my Plant and Excise group.
What other settings are required for that.
System is working fine for DIEX ETT.
Thx in advance for your replies ....
Regards
Shrey

Hi Bharat ,
Thx for reply ....
There was no Sub Trans "OH" available in my system , I did define it and specify the Excise Accounts and GL accounts for my "Exise group + MRDY + my company code + OH" Combination.
But system is still not picking OH HOLD cenvat account.
I have one query , since I am selecting RG23C at the header level .... will system not place the half amount automatically in ON HOLD account ?
Regards
Shrey

Transaction Code J1ih and Business Area

Dear All,
In CIN, In transaction codeJ1IH, Business Area field is appearing (optional)
how to suppress this field in transaction codeJ1IH
settings in transaction code OBC4 (Fields status group) settings are showing in suppress mode
We have not activated Business area in FI - Segmental Reporting also
regards
V

Hi:
You can set it as invisible using screen variant SHD0....I do not have access to SAP write now otherwise i would have told you step by step process to do so. Create screen variant for t code J1IH with BA invisible and and assign it to this t code in SHD0 and activate.
Regards

Transaction Code IQ02 - Other Tab

Hi,
I have managed to create a bepoke subscreen in the transaction codes IQ01/2/3 using the Project ITOB0001.
My problem is with a standard subscreen that is also output. This subscreen is namesd Vendor/Customer Data.
It appears that my subscreen can not be very big due to this standard subscreen.
Is there anyway to not show this standard subscreen.
Thanks
Martin

Hi,
Compare the time zone set for both the users.
Regards,
Nirmal.

J2I9 and J1IH Reversal (Other Adjustment)

Hi ,
I have made some Transactions thru J1IH (additional excise option) , the record of this posted transaction is being appeared in J2I9 and J1I7.
Now I have done a reversal of this Transaction using J1IH (Other Adjustment Option) , but this record is not being appeared in J2I9. Although this entry is perfectly updated in J1I7.
Do I need to do something to make them appear in J2I9
Regards
Shrey

Hi,
In J2I9 values of credit used are coming after utilisation only.
regards,
sujit

Transaction code for excise JV especially to cenvat on hold account

Friends,
Can anyone advice that in system for correcting excise register, the jv have to be posted for the following accounts-
cenvat on hold
RG23 BED
RG23 ECS
RG23 H CESS
cenvat clearing account
By which transaction code, jv to be posted. I know that for RG23 BED, ECS, H CESS, Cenvat clearing account can be corrected by using transaction code - J1IH but in my case i have to correct cenvat on hold account also for assets items.
Can anyone advice how to proceed.
Thanks
Madhukar Mittal

like u have done following enrty
cenvat on hold     115 +
RG23 BED     100 +
RG23 ECS        10 +
RG23 H CESS    5 +
cenvat clearing account   230 -
now u want to reverse it right
then u will first have to go to J2I8 and tahe the credit of 115 cenvat on hold account
so that
RG23 BED     100 +
RG23 ECS        10 +
RG23 H CESS    5 +
will come to RG 23 C register on credit side
so ur RG23C registure will have
RG23 BED     200 +
RG23 ECS        20 +
RG23 H CESS    10 +
now use J1IH other Adj select Rg23C
for amount
BED     200
ECS        20
H CESS    10
so that the entry will be passed
RG23 BED     200 -
RG23 ECS        20 -
RG23 H CESS    10 -
cenvat clearing account   230 +
this is the std sap way to reverse the Captial credit taken
hope this helps

Error - Interest already calculted on account - Transaction code FINT

Hi,
I am getting error "Interest already calculted on account <date> " while executing transaction code FINT. I could not simulate it. I cannot understand in which case actually this error comes. Has any body faced this error ? If yes, in which case actually it is happening ?
Regards,
Manish

Hi, you can change the original system of the transaction code and possibly reassign it to a valid transportable package (development class). This can be achieved via transaction code SE03 --> Change Object Directory Entries. In section "Selection by Objects" you need to tick the checkbox (3rd up from the bottom) and enter next to it "TRAN". Next to TRAN type your transaction code and press execute. On the following screen, select your transaction code and choose button "change object directory". Here you can change the Package and/or original system of the transaction code. At the same time you can assign your tcode to a transport request etc...

Posting of cenvat credit of 50% on capital goods through T.Code:J1IH

Hi
Please advise me the procedure for posting of cenvat credit of 50% on capital goods through T.Code:J1IH.
As a matter of fact, when i tried to post the last year credit of 50% cenvat credit on capital goods the system accepting 50% only.
For example, last year we got Rs.200000 as cenvat credit and out of that 50% credit of Rs.100000 got availed last year. In this year when i tried to avail of remaining of Rs.100000 through transaction code J1IH system is accepting 50% of Rs.100000 i.e only Rs.50000 is accepting.
I look forward for your reply
Thanks and Best Regards
Shekhar
Edited by: Shekhar Yecham on Sep 16, 2008 8:54 PM

Hello,
The settings before 01.04.2010 were same. However, after thorough checking of the GL A/cs, I have following observations -
1) Plant 1 - Balance as on 31.03.2010 in Cenvat on Hold A/c -Rs. 195080. It is upload balance & t.code used is FBVB
    There are some more transctions in this A/c which are reversed due to wrong entries.
    Balance in Excise Duty RG 23 C as on 31.03.2010 - NIL
2) Plant 2 - Balance in Cenvat on Hold A/c as on 31.03.2010 is Rs. 166701. Again this is an upload balance with FBVB
    Balance in Excise Duty RG 23 C as on 31.03.2010 - Rs. 56931.62
3) Plant 3 - No upload balance. All the transactions are routed through J1IEX except 1 from FB01
    Balance as on 31.03.2010 - Cenvat On Hold A/c - Rs. 86876.06
                                                 ED RG 23C - NIL
Hence, would like to know -
1) Any separate procedure to take the credit of upload entries?
2) If the Balance in ED RG 23C A/c is NIL, will it affect on taking credit?
Thanks & Regards,
Reshma

Fi validation -exclude tr code from other modules

I am setting up a validation at the Fi line item level. Now it is restricting some documents comming from MM which we don't want to. Is it possible to exclude some of the transaction codes from other modules to not to consider this validation.
I tried SYST-TCODE <> (T-Code from other modules like MM for eg: MIRO etc)
But that does not seem to work.
Does anyone know why and are there any options to get this done.
Any help will be appreciated

Hello,
Please validate BKPF-AWTYP (reference procedure)
For postings done in FI its, BKPF and so for others it would change.
This would be simple.
But for this check whether this field can be used for validation.
This can be done by checking table GB01, if not change the settings to make this field available for validation.
Best Regards
Anantha

How to stop user from using 961 mvt type in MB1C transaction code?

Hi Friends,
We have two companies. Already we have restricted end user for using 961 & 962 mvt type in MB1C transaction code in one company code 1000. Now, we want to restrict end user for using 961 & 962 mvt type in MB1C transaction code in other company code 1200.
I have checked configuration using OMJJ transaction. But, it is there so there may be some different way of control.
Can any body help me?
Regards
Siva

Hi,
To restrict/block the movement type, the steps are:
1. use transaction code OMJJ.
2. Enter the movement type you want to block.[From 961 To 961](do for both961& 962)
3. Select the Second option in the List which appears in the left. (Allowed Transaction).
4. Remove the transaction codes (MB1C)from where you do not want to use that particular movement type& save.
For user specific to block the movement type, pl consult Basis Consultant.
Regards,
Biju K

How to assign Authorisation to a transaction code

Hi ,
I have created a report and i have assigned a transaction code to it.
But i want only 3 users to access the transaction code when others try to access the Transaction code there should be a message saying that they are not authorised to view that.
Can someone help me out in this regard

Hi Arvind,
Go to TCode SE93 enter your Tcode and Change it. There enter Authorization object as S_TCODE.
Cheerz
Ram

Difference in Account Code combination at Transaction and Accounting entry

Hi All,
We are working on Subledger Modifications (SLA) for a Client in order to meet few key business scenarios... Even though we were able to achieve the desired outcome through SLA, client is not pleased about the fact, there exists two different account code combinations for a transaction i.e.
1) The account code combination that is defaulted or entered in the transaction
2) The account code combination that is used for creating the accounting entry considering the modifications done at SLA.
There is a difference between the above two, due to modifications carried out in SLA.
Since the scope of SLA is limited only to make changes at the Accounting entry level, such variations would exist, however client is not comfortable with such an approach.
We are performing the SLA changes for three modules: 1) Cost Management 2) Accounts Receivables and 3) Accounts Payables
If someone has worked on such similar situation in your previous assignments, perhaps you can share how the same was addressed.
(Such as any customizations, Workarounds, irrefutable justifications etc ..)
Thanks and Regards,
Karthikeyan

Hi,
Check is there any restrictions are there . the data must be displayes if the data is there in infocube.
Regards
sivaraju

J1IH-accounting entries

Dear All
what should be accounting entries for J1iH for Other Adjustment For RE23 C
I Am Getting following entries
RG23 C BED - Cr
RG23 C ECS - Cr
RG23 C SECEss - Cr
Cenvat Clearing - Dr
or It should be
RG23 C BED - Cr
RG23 C ECS - Cr
RG23 C SECEss - Cr
On Hold Account - Cr ( 50% Amount )
Cenvat Clearing - Dr
Thanks

Hi All ,
In my case also , enteries are not moving to CENVAT ON HOLD account(50%) for RG23C while doing MRDY (Other adjustment) in J1IH.
I checked the "Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction" ......."ONHOLD CENVAT on Hold Account" set as credit for MRDY ETT.
In "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction", correct GL has been assigned under "CENVAT OH" heading for MRDY for my Plant and Excise group.
What other settings are required for that.
System is working fine for DIEX ETT.
Thx in advance for your replies ....
Regards
Shrey

Transaction code J1IH other adjustment accounting entries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for