Transaction F-03 requiring trading partner

Hello guys,
I am trying to clear some items in transaction F-03 which are amounting to zero.
But when i try to clear i am getting a message that trading partner is required since this is an inter-comapny posting.
I have checked the field status for this particular GL, the field trading partner is not suppressed.
When i simulate the document, i am also getting a difference in FX which is asking me for trading partner to clear.
Can some help, could this have anything to do with validation or document change rules?
Thank you
Thomson

Hi Srikanth,
TRADING PARTNER FIELD REQUIRED AT T.CODE LEVEL AND GL ACCOUNT LEVEL
Please follow the below steps. You will get the excepted requirement.
Use T.Code: GGB0
1. FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING - LINE ITEM
2. CLICK ON CREATE STEP ICON ON APPLICATION BAR
3. CLICK ON PREREQUISITE OPTION
BKPF-BUKRS = 'XXXX' AND BSEG-HKONT = 'XXXXXXXX' OR
BKPF-TCODE = 'F-03' OR BKPF-TCODE = 'FB50' OR BKPF-TCODE = 'FB60'
OR BKPF-TCODE = 'FB70'
4. CLICK ON CHECK OPTION
BSEG-VBUND <> ''
5. CLICK ON MESSAGE OPTION
MESSAGE TYPE: E
MESSAGE NO: XXX
ERROR MESSAGE: MAINTAIN TRADING PARTNER FIELD
6. Use T.code: OB28
Give Company Code: XXXX
Call Point: 2
Validation Rule: XXXX
Activation Level: 1
SAVE
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay

Similar Messages

Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled

Hi
The user had some old documents and he is trying to clear them.
During clearing he is facing an error "Account 12221001 requires trading partner to be filled"
Trading partner field is blank in the reconciliation account 12221001 and also customer account.
BSEG of the document which gives the problem. The reconciliation account is 12221001, the trading partner for the customer line is not filled in.
How can we fill the trading partner on this line item?
Thanks in Advance,
Deepthi.

hi,
trading partner field is populated from account , customer or vendor.
if your customer wants to clear old documents, most probably, some documents are filled with trading partner field and others are not.
in this situation you cannot clear these documents.
i have faced the same iproblem. to solve it, you should determine the balance of trading partner included documents,
you should post two documents using a dummy document.
lets say the balance is 20.000 usd
you should post: (initially you should maintain trading partner field in customer data)
DR/CR customer.........20.000usd
CR/DR dummy acc. ..........20.000 usd
second posting ( you should clear the trading partner field in customer data)
CR/DR custoemr......20.0000usd
DR/CR dummy acc.....20.000 usd
now you can clear items with trading partner is filled.

ACC GL Posting idoc requires trading partner

Hello all,
I have created a new interface, which posts an ACC_GL_POSTING Idoc to SAP.
However this idoc runs into error as follows:
CLIA: Line item 000 - G/L account 5590041 has to be posted with trading partner.
I know which trading partner this account has to be posted with. However this partner is used for multiple company codes.
The document type is ZA. When I look in OBA7 the "Inter-company postings" checkbox is not ticked. The "Enter trading partner" checkbox is ticked.
Do you have any tips for me? Are there some specific settings I should check? What options do I have to get this Idoc processed succesfully automatically? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
- Mike

Hello Gaurav,
Thanks for your fast response.
I haven't defaulted the trading partner as the trading partner can vary for the same GL Account.
I am trying to get GL Postings processed using the ACC_GL_POSTING idoc type. However I was wondering whether there is a way to avoid entering the trading partner manually. Or how it is possible to enter the trading partner manually when trying to use idoc processing.
- Mike

Batch-Input/CALL TRANSACTION FB01: Trading Partner cannot be filled in

Dear experts,
I have the following problem with performing an FB01 booking on the basis of
CALL TRANSACTION USING:
In the customizing of the FI document type you can mark several fields that
are supposed to appear when you perform an FB01 posting, among them
the "Trading partner". But this field only seems to show in Non-BTCI-mode.
There are SAP Notes treating the phenomenon of the additional COBL-data
screen being always brought up with all available fields in BTCI mode
(which is fine for me, since I actually want to fill in some fields there, too),
but this screen does not contain the trading partner and I can't find any hint
why fields like BSEG-VBUND (trading partner) apparently cannot be reached
at all in BTCI-Mode.
Does anybody know this problem, or better yet: have a solution ?
Thanks in advance
Andreas

Hello Akanksha,
I suppose you're interested in how you make the fields available/visible
in the posting transactions ?
BSEG-VBUND/Trading partner for instance belongs to the
supposed-to-be-available checkbox-selection in customizing of the
document type you are going to use for your posting.
The availability of the additional controlling fields (cost center, order no. etc.)
depends on the cost accounting being active and on the field status group
that is chosen for your account.
In the booking/posting transactions you reach the fields with the button
"further data".
Best regards
Andreas

Trading Partner Configuration from FICA site

Dear Gurus,
We are struggling to bring the Trading Partner ID on FB03 or FBL3N screen after SAP ISU Invoice posting ? Please suggest necessary configuration or User Exit / Enhancement required for this.
Thanks In Advance
With Regards,
Sunil

Hi Sunil,
Trading partner can be inherited or derived from master or can be entered manually in transactions.
Updation of trading partner is being controlled through relevant document type configuration in SAP
Its being controlled through two main check boxes in document type configuration (transaction code-OBA7) namely, "Inter-company postings" and "Enter Trading partner" check boxes
a) If "Inter-company postings" check box is set and "Enter Trading partner" is not set
Functionality: Trading partner is derived from master data and no manual entry is possible in line item / transactions. Here trading partner must not be unique in a document.
b) If "Inter-company postings" check box is not set and "Enter Trading partner" is set
Functionality: Trading partner can be manually entered in line item / transaction by choosing Extras menu button -> Trading partner which will be applicable for all the line items in a document. Here trading partner is unique in the document.
c) If both "Inter-company postings" and "Enter Trading partner" check boxes are set
Functionality: Trading partners are derived from master data and can also be entered manually in the line item / transaction in the "More Data" screen. Here trading partner must not be unique in a document.
d) If both "Inter-company postings" and "Enter Trading partner" check boxes are not set
Functionality: Trading partner can be manually entered in a line item / transaction by choosing Extras menu button -> Trading partner which will be applicable for all the line items in a document. Here trading partner is unique in the document.
In short, both options (b) and (d) represents the same functionality and it depends on each of the document type configuration with the business process involved.
Hope it helps...
Thanks,
Amlan

Trading Partner issue in ECC

I have just activated the trading partner in ECC vendor/customer master on 1.09.08, thus all posting before this date was posted without trading partner information.
In BCS, I plan to load balance as at 31.8.08 using flexible upload as opening balance with all the "correct" trading partner information breakdown and subsequently, period movement will be extracted from ECC.
However, I notice that in ECC, when we make payment to open item created before 1.9.08 (document without trading partner), system will not populate the trading partner information, instead the trading partner information in original line (i.e. blank) will be posted.
I think this will create a problem, as I alrady uploaded the inter company balance with correct breakdown, but now period movement will be posted without trading partner, thus my balance in BCS will not be correct.
Anyone face the same issue before? Appreciate you can share with me how to overcome this issue, thanks.
Regards.

This is not an uncommon problem. A few ways to address this are: correction posting in ECC, or correction posting in BCS.
In ECC a posting to move amounts from blank/null trading partner to actual trading partner is one solution. However this is not always possible when the accounts are reconciliation accounts.
In the case of reconciliation accounts it may be better to post the correction in BCS at posting level 10.
Another way to address this is to change the breakdown for these accounts to require trading partner and if blank default is used. Then the correcting entries are from default trading partner to the true trading partner in BCS.

Note 779844 Inheritance of trading partner to line items

hello
I need to apply OSS note 779844. This Note has three steps:
1. A series of source code changes in the system (done through Tx. SNOTE).
2. Modify database table GB01 by adding to boolean class 15, table BSEG, the field VBUND (company)
3.Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is implemented.
I have trouble understanding what should be the logic for the point 3, the substitution.
the note say that "the inheritence of the trading partner (VBUND) to allother line items of the other company code also occurs if not all line items of the two company codes (except for the company code clearinglines) contain profit and loss accounts, therefore also if line items with balance accounts are involved in the posting"
The note also says to use the substitution with a user exit. I don't know what user exit I should use.
does anyone applied this note before? can anybody explain to me what logic should I use for the FI substitution?
thanks

Hi Jorge,
I'm in the middle of implementing this SAP note. Just like you, i encountered the same problem.
I don't understand what does the note means for solution no 3.
   "Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with
   a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is
    implemented."
If you have found the solution, please share with me.
TQ.

Validation Rule for making Trading Partner mandatory in FB50

Hi,
Validation Rule for making Trading Partner mandatory in FB50
I am trying to make trading field mandatory in FB50. If trading partner is not entered for the line items in FB50, User should get a error
I have tried the follwiong (at the Line Item level) and it does not work:
1)
Prerequiste:
Transaction code = 'FB50'
Check:
Trading Partner = ''
Message:
2)
Prerequiste:
SYST-TCODE = 'FB50'
Check:
Trading Partner = ''
Message:
Any ideas?

The message will only be issued when the result of the check is false. If you want to issue an error when a trading partner value is not entered, then your check needs to be Trading partner <> ''. If the user enters a Trading partner value, the check will be true and no message will be issued. If the user does not enter a Trading partner, the check will be false and the message will be issued.

Trading partner ID in line 000 is required for internal transaction

Hello Team,
Greetings..!
I would need your suggestion on following error "Trading partner ID in line 000 is required for internal transaction"
Accounting did not dropped for a credit memo, when i told user to release the invoice to accounting we got the above mention error
Trading partner ID in line 000 is required for internal transaction message no YM027
Please suggest the possible solution to fix this issue
Awaiting your favorable reply
Regards
Shabeer

Hello Experts,
Can any one guide me what can be possible way to fix this bug?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Shabeer

Trading Partner - Required Field

Hi Gurus,
How can i make trading partner as a required field while posting any JV?
And also, i want to put a validation for profit center and Trading Partner.
Please revert asap.
THank YOu

We have all this configuration set up. We do automatically get the trading partner populated on the balance sheet side of the entry. We charge our subsidiaries inter company fees such as interest, management fees, commissions, etc. We want to have the trading partner populated on these P&L account items as well because we then segregate these types of expenses by company in order to eliminate them in consolidation. Many of these types of entries are done in GL entry using transaction code FB01 or F-65 to park. When using these t-codes the trading partner does not get automatically populated in the P&L account item. We want to make sure they add a trading partner when using these P&L accounts for inter company type expenses.

R/3 report of transactions with trading partner

Hi
I posted intercompany transaction (using trading partner). I need to know if there is any tcode for R/3 report which will show transactions with trading partners. I require for AR AP GL transactions.
I came to know that there is some tcode which will show transaction of one trading partner in another books and vice versa. I checked into information system. But i didn't got.
Please let me know

Hi,
For reconciling associated companies, you can access these from the SAP application menu as follows:
SAP menu -> Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable or Accounts Payable -> Periodic Processing -> Closing -> Check/Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
These programs provide more functions and flexibility, and they enable you to reconcile data across different systems.
You carry out the Customizing for these programs in the SAP Customizing Guide under:
SPRO> Financial Accounting or Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Accounting -> Business Transactions -> Closing -> Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
Regards,
Gaurav

R/3 Report for trading partner transactions

Hi
I posted intercompany transaction (using trading partner). I need to know if there is any tcode for R/3 report which will show transactions with trading partners. I require for AR AP GL transactions.
I came to know that there is some tcode which will show transaction of one trading partner in another books and vice versa. I checked into information system. But i didn't got.

Hi,
For reconciling associated companies, you can access these from the SAP application menu as follows:
SAP menu -> Accounting -> Financial Accounting -> Accounts Receivable or Accounts Payable -> Periodic Processing -> Closing -> Check/Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
These programs provide more functions and flexibility, and they enable you to reconcile data across different systems.
You carry out the Customizing for these programs in the SAP Customizing Guide under:
SPRO> Financial Accounting or Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable Accounting -> Business Transactions -> Closing -> Count -> Cross-System Intercompany Reconciliation
Regards,
Gaurav

Trading partner required during clearing of Customer

Hi,
System is not allowing to clear two line items which is open in customer Account.
First document is posted with reconciliation account which is generally used for external customer for which trading partner is not required during document posting. Then we changed the reconciliation account which is used for internal customer for which Trading partner is required, but during document posting system did not capture any trading partner. No trading partner captured during both the document posting.
When we are trying to clear both these document using F-32 , now system asking for a trading partner.
Can any one suggest, how to clear both these document?
Thanks in Advance,
L Nayak

Dear Nayak
Add trading partner in the customer master before clearing the account in cust code f-32. The trading partner is available in Control data of the cust master
Regards
Saroj

IDOC Error - Trading Partner Required

Hello Expert,
I am trying to post a document through an idoc, but getting an error "Trading Partner required".
Where i have to update these details?
Thanks,
Satya

Hi Ashish,
The IDOC type is a customized one...
Then where i can check this field, can you give me some light on this?
In which segment it will be ?
Thanks,
Satya

Trading partner receiving two same transactions

Hi B2B Gurus,
Our scenario is Division people place the flat files to FTP folder, SOA picks the flat files from FTP and it transforms to EDI XML file and then it place the EDI XML to IP_OUT_QUEUE, B2B picks up the file and it transforms to native EDI and sends it to trading partner.
But here issue is we are sending a single transaction to trading partner and they are receiving the same payload with different filename
Ex: The file named - Penske_860_20110629_172354282965_20110629_132412042.dat (Interchange # 282965)
Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629132506.17334
The file named - Penske_860_20110629_183428283017_20110629_143441592.dat (Interchange # 283017)
Contains the same data as - emerson860_pp_out.110629143618.29885
Could any one help us how to cross chek this and wat are the chances for this ...
Regards
Sam

Hi Anuj,
Is it that same TP is receiving one transaction twice or same transaction is being passed to two TP's
ans:same TP is receiving one transaction twice with different filename with same payload.
We are using 10G B2B.
We are sending one transaction to tradaing partner and trading partner receving the same transactions twice with different file name and same payload.
Anuj, I cross check the filename in the log file, i am able to find only one file name in it. (Penske_850)
Is it possible that we sent one file and they are duplicating on theire side?
Regardds
sam

Transaction F-03 requiring trading partner

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for