Transfer of Z field of Confirmation of Goods to ECC

Hello Experts,
We are implementing Classic scenario of Self Service Procurement.
In confirmation of goods we have created a Zfield at Item level. Which is a standard field in R/3 MIGO.
We want to transfer this field in R/3 MIGO. How can we do it? Please guide us.
Note: Though its a standard field in R/3 but its not available in IDOC MBGMCR03.
thanks in advance.
Aakash.

Hi,
The Function Module which creates the confirmation IDOC to be posted from EBP message type MBGMCR is IDOC_GR_CREATE. You can find the structure and the fields in the FM which will be passed on the standard IDOC message type for the same. Inorder to accomodate custom fields you need to enhance the FM mentioned above as well as the message type MBGMCR in EBP and R/3.
Further remember you need to enhance the FM in R/3 BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for accomodating the custom fields. Further as of Release ERP2005, you have the option in the BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to use a BAdI to recognize customer-specific source code using an enhancement implementation.
Regards
Anirban

Similar Messages

Transfer of Customer field for Confirmation

Hello Expert,
We are implementing Classic scenario for Self Service Procurement. We have implemented customer field in Confirmation for Goods.
We want to know that how we can transfer the value of customer field to Backed GR?
Your valuable inputs will help us.
Thanks in advance.
Aakash.

You can try BADI 'BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI' , method 'BBP_CONF_CHANGE'. In 'IT_ITEM', you can try to find an unused placeholder and create the GR in backend with the custom field in the selected placeholder field.

Urgent : transfer of custom fields of a sales order from ECC to CRM

Hi,
We have a sales order which will be created in CRM and replicated to ECC.
We have added some custom fields in table VBAK, which we are displaying in the sales order additional data tab B. When the user saves the sales order,we need to transfer the fields back to CRM.
We are aware of the the BADI CRM_DATAEXCHG_BADI.
Also i think we need to conisder the structure BAPIMTCS but not sure how exactly we can use it.
On the CRM side these Z fields exist in the structure BAD_BUS_TRANSN_MESSAGE-CUSTOMER_H of the method CRM_DATAEXCH_R3D_MBDOC_FILL.
Can someone guidde us on how exactly do we transfer the value from ECC VBAK-Z* to CRM value BAD_BUS_TRANSN_MESSAGE-CUSTOMER_H.

Hi Sameer,
Thanks for the document.
I tried doing the same steps recommended(in the document it was for a customer). However i dont think my values from the ECC side are being passed to the CRM side.
I created a new Z structure and passed it via BAPIMTCS, but on the CRM side when i tired retrieving my Z structure,i dont think the system found it.
There are 2 BAPITCMS structures, t_table_info and the other t_bapistruc.
Do you know which one we need to fill up?
Thanks,
Neil.

Addition of Field Quantity in Confirmation of Goods

Hello Experts
We are implementing Self Service Procurement, Classical Scenario.
During the Confirmation of Goods in Self Service Procurement, we need an additional field 'Quantity in Delivery'.
We used SAP Note 672960 to display the field at the Screen under Item Level tab, however, we are getting a dump which says u2018Field symbol has yet not been assignedu2018. Along with that we are not able to get the value for this field.
Please help to get the dump corrected and to find a way to fetch the value for this field.
Thanks
Gaurav Giroti
Field symbol has yet not been assigned

Hi Gaurav,
Please check whether you have added the same custom field in the structure INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF.
Please go through the following blog to find the steps involved in adding the custom fields.
/people/nanda.kondagunta/blog/2006/10/23/how-to-create-custom-fields-in-srm
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Pradeep

Confirmation of goods with "Approved" Status

Hi All,
We are at SRM7.0 and working on extended classic.
After performing confirmation of goods receipt in SRM, the status is still showing as "approved" and not "posted in backend".
Kindly let us know how to reprocess these confirmations in SRM system.
Regards
K Gp

Hi Masa,
The document status in BBP_PD is showing as I1022 (Inactive = Blank).
There is no entry with status "Currently being transferred" in Status section in BBP_PD for this confirmation.
Checked in RZ20 tcode and didn't find any error related to this.
I tried executing the FM - BBP_PD_CONF_TRANSFER and BBP_PD_CONF_TRANSFER_V2. But no success.
If there is a way to process this confirmation again then pls let me know.
Regards,
K Gp

Fields under the tab Goods Receipt in process order.

Hello Experts,
While creation of process order, the fields under the tab 'Goods Receipt' are disabled and already checked.
Fields are 'Goods Receipt' and 'Goods Receipt, Non-Valuated'. Fields are 'WEPOS' and 'WEUNB' accordingly.
Whereas when we create the process order of same material but with different plant, the field 'Goods Receipt, Non-Valuated' is disabled and checked and other field 'Goods Receipt' is enabled.
The material is finished product.
Could you please guide us, is there any configuration in order type dependent parameters for the same.
Many Thanks in advacne.
Regards,
Mayur
Edited by: Mayur_PP on Nov 21, 2011 1:28 PM

Hi Niki
For Financial books, MBEW-STPRS would suffice....
This would also generate a CO doc...
But, if you want to anlayse variances in CO, then you need a break up of STPRS i.e. Itemization which is calculated from CK11N and stored in MBEW-LPLPR
BR, Ajay M

Can i cancel confirmation without goods movement?

when i cancel confirmation (co13) it will default auto reverse goods movement 102. but material are not in stock and then COGI will occur.
does anyone know any T-code to cancel confirmation without goods movement? because i want to cancel just activity.
thank you all.

Hi,
If your are cancelling the operation which is having the the Control Key : PP03 (auto GR) then only system will try to reverse the Goods Movement (Movt Type 102)., And if the material is not in Stock (sloc) then system will through the Goods MOvt failure and same can be seen in COGI and COrrected later, once the stock comes in Sloc.
There is NO Seperate transaction for just cancelling the Operation (Activity) without reversing the Goods Movement. Even it is not logical to do so as it may show as Negative WIP for the Order.
Hope this will help you.
regards
radhak mk

In TXN CO03, extract value for field "To Confirm" under tab "Qty/Activity"

Hi,
Can anyone help to extract value for field "To Confirm" under tab "QTY/ACTIVITIES" in tansaction CO03 at operatin level. There are three Activiti (CC-Set-up,CC-Labor Time & CC-Var-OH) under table control Activities. I need value of the field "To Confirm" for CC-Labor Time.
From where I can fetch this value,
1. Is this field available in some table?
2. Is there any FM with which the same can be extracted.
3. Any other method?
Regards,
Bibhuti.
Edited by: bibhuti kumar on Feb 20, 2008 6:16 AM

Hi,
pls use below table's and get detals you want
AFKO - Order header details
AFVC - Order operation details
AFVV - Order operation value/date's/qty details
the relation is below
Step1: AFKO; AUFNR-->AFKO-AUFPL
Step2: AFVC; AFKO-AUFPL = AFVC-AUFPL
take filed to APLZL,VORNR
Step3: AFVV;AFKO-AUFPL=AFVV-AUFPL, AFVC-AUFPL = AFVV-AUFPL
take filed to MGVRG,LMNGA,XMNGA,VGW02
Step4: (MGVRG - (LMNGA+XMNGA)) * VGW02
hope this will solve your problem
Regards,
Sankaran

Transfer of Pricing Conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC (Extended Classic)

Hi All,
I am currently doing an enhancement on a copy of function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER and the implementation of BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE BAdI that will call the copied FM to transfer the pricing conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC since in standard only net price is being transferred to ECC.
During the creation of PO, everything is ok. All conditions are transferred to ECC.
But we are encountering problems in the replication from SRM to ECC when changes are done in the PO during deleting or inserting a condition to an item. Our problem is in figuring out what will trigger us to use Change types U, I, E, D in populating the CHANGE_ID field in POCOND table that will be used in BBP_PO_INBOUND function module.
During creation of PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I' on all conditions to be transferred.
When there are modifications on a PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'U' and I am encountering problem when new conditions are inserted to an item since it will not be displayed (which I believe in this case, POCOND-CHANGE_ID should be 'I'), and when deleting a condition to an item.
I would like to ask, if there is an indicator that a condition will be inserted to an item for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I', and for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'D' when a condition will be deleted.
By the way, I used FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL (exporting: E_PRIDOC) to get the PO conditions to be transferred and have checked E_PRIDOC-DEL_IND to check if a condition will be deleted. Unfortunately, it is not working on the deletion since it seems that DEL_IND field is not being populated if a condition will be deleted.
Many thanks,
Kezia
Edited by: Kezia Layug on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM

Hi All,
I am currently doing an enhancement on a copy of function module B46B_DPO_TRANSFER and the implementation of BBP_DRIVER_DETERMINE BAdI that will call the copied FM to transfer the pricing conditions from SRM 5.0 to ECC since in standard only net price is being transferred to ECC.
During the creation of PO, everything is ok. All conditions are transferred to ECC.
But we are encountering problems in the replication from SRM to ECC when changes are done in the PO during deleting or inserting a condition to an item. Our problem is in figuring out what will trigger us to use Change types U, I, E, D in populating the CHANGE_ID field in POCOND table that will be used in BBP_PO_INBOUND function module.
During creation of PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I' on all conditions to be transferred.
When there are modifications on a PO, I have set POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'U' and I am encountering problem when new conditions are inserted to an item since it will not be displayed (which I believe in this case, POCOND-CHANGE_ID should be 'I'), and when deleting a condition to an item.
I would like to ask, if there is an indicator that a condition will be inserted to an item for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'I', and for us to assign POCOND-CHANGE_ID = 'D' when a condition will be deleted.
By the way, I used FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL (exporting: E_PRIDOC) to get the PO conditions to be transferred and have checked E_PRIDOC-DEL_IND to check if a condition will be deleted. Unfortunately, it is not working on the deletion since it seems that DEL_IND field is not being populated if a condition will be deleted.
Many thanks,
Kezia
Edited by: Kezia Layug on Mar 3, 2009 4:24 PM

PO confirmation not sent to ECC

Hi SNC Gurus
I have typical problem in PO collaboration, for PO confirmation. The PO is confirmed and published in SNC and showing status published, but the confirmation not updated on ECC side.
In application log (Transaction SLG1 - getting error as- PO XXX Item XXX: "ShippingPeriodEndDateTime should come before ShippingPeriodStartDateTime"
One more thing I checked is when PO delivry date is as per "Planned delivery date" in the material master then PO confirmation is working fine.
But when PO delivery date is not as per planned delivery time . ie suppose planned delivery time is 15 days in matl master but i enter delivery date in PO as equal to future 10 days then PO confirmation is not flowing from SNC to ECC..
Also please let me know how mode of transport duration in transportation lane affects PO shipping date on SNC side?
Will appriciate you early reply.
Thanks
VSK

Hi Nikhil
Thanks for the reply, but in POC3 we have only below validation profiles maintained
POC3     PO_COMPONENT_PRODUCT_INVALID     A Active
POC3     PO_COMPONENT_PRODUCT_MISSING     A Active
POC3     PO_COMPONENT_QUANTITY_MISSING     A Active
POC3     PO_COMPONENT_UOM_INVALID     A Active
POC3     PO_COMPONENT_UOM_MISSING     A Active
The profile you mentioned is not maintained.
Thanks
VSK

Custom fields on confirm goods/services centrally

Hi Gurus,
I am working in classic scenario of SRM 5.0.
I have a requirement for which I need to add 2 custom fields on extended search screen of confirm goods/services centrally; I have tried implementing the note 672960 which did not helped me.
Can anybody please suggest me if you have any info.
Thanks,
Arun.

Hi Arun,
From what i understood from your query, you want to add fields on the "CONFIRM GOODS/SERVICES CENTRALLY" transaction search screen.
The fields are 'shopping cart number' and 'shopping cart creator'.
Please go through the following OSS Note:
Note 672960 - User-defined fields 2
I think the structure you should use are:
INCL_EEW_PD_SEARCH_HDR_CSF_CNF
If you have defined document-specific fields on header and/or item level, you also have to define them in structures INCL_EEW_PD_HEADER_CSF (for the fields of the header) and INCL_EEW_PD_ITEM_CSF IF THEY HAVE NOT BEEN DEFINED THERE YET. Consequently, these structures contain the combination of header or item fields of all document-specific fields
You can also use user-defined fields as search criteria. To do this, you have to set fields XINPUT and XDISPLAY to 'X' in table ET_FIELDS for the fields you want to use in BADI BBP_CUF_BADI_2 in method MODIFY_SCREEN. The fields defined this way are displayed if you choose the 'Extended search' link.
Hope this helps,
Thanks,
Pradeep

WDA Leave Request -- Hide Customer Field in Confirmation Popup

Hello folks,
System Information:
NW AS 7.03 ABAP Stack 731 Level 11, ECC 606 (EHP 6) with SAP_HR 604 Level 73 and EA_HR 607 (HR-Renewal 1) Level 24
Background:
For Our WDA Leave Request application, our special department has requested to provide certain additional fields for particular Leave Types, all in all these are three check boxes and one Link-To-URL-UI. I have created these fields, or rather configured them via IMG Customizing Tables V_PT_FIELD_SEL / V_PT_FIELD_SEL_C, using the ten standard customer fields provided by SAP CUSTOMER01 - CUSTOMER10.
After making the subsequential customizing configurations, I have enhanced the WDA OVP-FPM CC "HRESS_CC_GUIBBF_LEAVREQ" to change the respective fields' UI-Type from "Inputfield" to "Checkboxgroup" and "LinkToAction". So far so good; it's nothing fancy and everything works out the way it should.
Problem:
Our special department has recently noted, that the Link-To-Action provided is also taken into account by the Confirmation Dialogue Popup-Box and correctly set read-only like any other field as well. However, the fact that this read-only-link is then also shown in the Popup-Box is confusing to some users and should therefore be hidden. My plan was to enhance the WDA OVP-FPM CC "HRESS_CC_GUIBBF_LEAVREQDIALOG" and simply set the field CUSTOMER01(that's the one field I use for the Link-To-Action-UI) invisible and that's exactly what I did. But look what the effect is:
You can see behind the lightbox in the Form, how the field is usually displayed in the Form-UIBB. What I "achieved" now, though, is, that only the lable is hidden in the Popup-Box through my enhancement in "HRESS_CC_GUIBBF_LEAVREQDIALOG" and the LinkText is still visible.
What I did so far / Question:
So... I went ahead and debugged the feeder class CL_HRESS_PTARQ_LEAVREQ_GUIBBF. I found out that in the Methods "FIELDS_SHOW_HIDE_CLEAR" and "FIELD_SETTING_BY_CUSTOMIZING" I would theoretically be able to manipulate the visibility, but:
This would mean I'd have to create overwrite-exits, which I would like to avoid, because maintenance is a pain.
Manipulating the process flow here probably has side effects on the field control of the overall application which must not happen. If I'm extremely unlucky it might even effect the data flow.
This brings me to my ultimate question: How do I make a field from this Confirmation Dialogue Popupbox cleanly disappear/invisible in a super-duper-elegant way without using a sledgehammer? Maybe there is a customizing-way I have overlooked so far? (please?)
Cheers, Lukas

Hi Samuli/Yugandhar,
what you suggest is exactly what I did:
My plan was to enhance the WDA OVP-FPM CC "HRESS_CC_GUIBBF_LEAVREQDIALOG" and simply set the field CUSTOMER01(that's the one field I use for the Link-To-Action-UI) invisible and that's exactly what I did.
The only derivation from your suggestions is that I didn't make a deep copy but an enhancement instead, which Creates a delegation Object that automatically inherits from the standard CC. Technically a copy or an enhancement do exactly the same but maintenance is a lot smoother for enhancements, that's why.
Cheers, Lukas
P.S. @ Yugandhar, nice to see you are still around! Indeed I'm primarily occupied with the module FI-TV, that's why I'm only wandering around the ESS/MSS subforums now and then.
Message was edited by: Lukas Weigelt

Line item confirmation and goods reciept number of a shopping cart

Hi All ,
I am waiting for any response from u guys to my below post ....
I have developed an end to end report in SRM which gives us an end to end report of a shopping cart .
I have got the Shopping Cart details using FM : BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL
for each item of the shopping cart in the table E_ITEM , getting the Po number for it from E_ITEM- BE_OBJECT_ID
I called FM BBP_BE_PO_GETHISTORY to get the Confirmation and Invoice number from E_HEADER_REL of BBP_BE_PO_GETHISTORY.
But this function module gives me the confirmation and invoice number of a particular purchase order and
I am stuck here as I need to find out the confirmation and invoice number of a line item and I am not finding a link between them .
I tried using FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL ,
BBP_PD_PO_GETLIST
BBP_PD_PO_DOC_FLOW and other function modules also , however they give me the confirmation and invoices o a particular PO but I am not able further drill down to find confirmation and invoivce of a particular line item of a shopping cart ..
Please let me know if there is a way to find this out ????
Has anybody have an idea to find this out ????
Useful answers would be rewarded .
Regards,
Prabhu

Hi All ,
I was able to get a link using the function module BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL . in the tables E_item has fields BE_OBJ_ITEM and the BE_OBJ_ITEM which give the po number and po line item number of each line item .
then i used BBP_BE_PO_GETHISTORY Fm to get the history of the po and read the line item history based on the BE_OBJ_ITEM no .
Thanks to all .
Prabhu

To transfer Selection Screen field value from a program to another Program

Hello,
Program Z_ABC having Select Option Field XYZ.
I need to transfer all the values entered on Selection Option Field XYZ to another Program Dialog Z_DIALOG.

Hi,
Try to use the function module 'RS_REFRESH_FROM_SELECTOPTIONS'.
For ex:
CALL FUNCTION 'RS_REFRESH_FROM_SELECTOPTIONS'
       EXPORTING
            curr_report     = sy-repid
       TABLES
            selection_table = it_soptions
       EXCEPTIONS
            not_found       = 1
            no_report       = 2
            OTHERS          = 3.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    EXIT.
ENDIF.
SUBMIT riaufk20 WITH dy_selm = 'D'
                  WITH SELECTION-TABLE it_soptions
                  AND RETURN.
Hope it solves your issue.
Regards,
Chenthamarai.

Field Catalog in Free Goods Setup

Hi Gurus,
We are trying to set up Free Goods in CRM standalone. No condition type is replicated from R/3 and we have to set up everything from scratch in CRM. Under the IMG, Free goods, the first menu option is 'Field Catalog'. Could you please advise what this is used for? Can we still set up 'buy A get B for free' without setting anything in this option?
many thanks,
Leon

hi
field catlog help to add conditon to the condition table which is used for selecting the conditions for Free Goods hence field cat is must as it help to determine free goods thru conditions
do let me know if it suffice ur requirement

Transfer of Z field of Confirmation of Goods to ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for