Transitory account splitted during clearing with FB05

Hello,
I have a problem with the clearing with FB05. When I insert the first item (i.e. bank account -100) and then I process the open items on the transitory account (i.e. 3 items: -50; -20; -30) the system clears these 3 items posting a document like this:
bank: -100
transitory: +20
transitory: +80
Do you know why it splits the transitory account in 2 parts? I expected to have only one item on the transitory account.
Regards
Davide

Hi
Your example seems to be wrong.  In case ,if the clearing is happening against a payment, then the Bank account is missing in your entry.
If the second line item in the below entry is a Bank account, then the debit / credit totals will be equvalent to the invoice amount.
Example of clearing:
Nr.Key Account  Value
1 40 xxxxxxx (differece account)  1,50    
2 07 90001230  (customer)              415,00    
3 17 90001230  (customer)              416,50-
And in case, if you are creating two documents i.e. one for posting the payment and later another one for clearing, then it is obvious that the amounts will be double in FD10N.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Put in correct user name and pass word but still having problem with account authenitication, have cleared with time warner cable,

    can not write or receive, a pop up wants my password but will not accept. I have spent much time trying to correct this.

    In order for us to better investigate this issue you need to add a little more non-personal information.
    Please add the troubleshooting information to your post
    To find the Troubleshooting information:
    * Open Help (or click on three-line-icon and select Help)
    * Choose Troubleshooting Information
    * Use the button Copy to clipboard to select all. Do not check box "Include account names"!
    * Paste this in your post.
    Please also add the result of these troubleshooting steps to your post
    *Does Thunderbird work in TB Safe mode (see [http://mzl.la/1k5DWjq Thunderbird Safe Mode])?
    *Do you use anti-virus and firewall software? What is the version?
    *Who is the email provider?
    *Who is the internet provider?
    *What is the exact error message?
    *What steps did you take right before this happened?
    Please post back with this information and any other questions you might have.

  • ISSUE: TDS REVERSAL DURING ADVANCE CLEARING WITH INVOICE

    Dear All
      I am having problem related to TDS reversal.
    For e.g
    Advance payment to Vendor: rs 10000/
    Tds deducted is rs 200/
    Now Invoice posted for amount is: 100000/
    Tds deductes is rs 1000/
    We know that TDS on rs 10000 is deducted twice which is generally reversed during advance clearing with invoice through F-54. But when I am clearing Ad. with Invoice, no TDS is getting reversed.
    Please help me on this issue or is there any other way of doing this process.
    points will be awarded
    Thanks in advance
    sandeep panwar

    Hi
    run the program RWTF010 in SE38
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • How to use function to Post with Clearing - Partial Pymnt with FB05

    hi,Dears,
    I am write a function to post with clearing - partial pymnt or Res. Items with FB05, but there is no any BAPI to do that, and I find the function POSTING_INTERFACE_CLEARING.
    but it seems that the function is only for Post with Clearing-Standard Screen, how to use that function to post with clearing - partial pymnt or Res. Items???
    Many thanks.

    Hi  Guys,
    If you post partiall payment you don't clear the invoice. Just post a normal item and fill the connection with the invoice, filling fields rebzg, rebzj, rebzz.
      PERFORM fill_ftpost using:
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-BSCHL' '15', "
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-HKONT'  customer_id ,
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-WRBTR'  tmpt,
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-GSBER'  it_pozkli-gsber,
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-SGTXT'  'Patial payment',
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-REBZG'  it_pozkli-belnr,
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-REBZJ'  it_pozkli-gjahr,
                       'P' '3' 'BSEG-REBZZ'  it_pozkli-buzei.

  • FICA: Clearing rules for account maintenance & auto clearing to apply credits against unpaid security deposits regardless of due date

    Hi Folks,
    We have a requirement in FICA clearing rules to apply the payment against unpaid security deposit irrespective of the due date. I have the below rule configured as the first step in my clearing variant.
    Grouping String: 019 (statistical indicator); Grp Rule: 3; Char Value: H (security deposits); AIRI: 4;  Group: 019
    Sort characteristic: 010 (Due date); Rank: 3; Char value: H; Rank: 1
    I have maintained the corresponding clearing variant in all the clearing types (account maintenance, automatic clearing, and incoming payments); Clearing rule is working perfectly during payments, however for account maintenance and automatic clearing it's not applying the credits against security deposits first. I still see that the items are cleared only based on due date;
    Am I missing something here? Please share your suggestions.
    Thanks,
    Santosh

    Santosh:
    This rule will not work in account maintenance.  You would need to include the data about the credits into your grouping criteria in order for that to work.  Most clearing rules do not work for account maintenance as they do for payments.  You probably need to have a separate variant with a rule not based on statistical indicator, but rather based on transaction value or maybe create your own custom grouping via TFK116.
    regards,
    bill.

  • Line items in AB document during clearing?

    Hello!
    When I'm clearing below line items
    PK G/L        DocumentNo Itm Type     Sp. GL Amount in doc. curr.
    29 433110     1500006162   1 KT       D               7.054,04
    29 433110     1500006163   1 KT       D             134.710,80
    31 433110     1900012587   1 KR                       7.054,04-
    31 433110     1900012570   1 KR                     134.710,80-
    as a result I get document
    27 433110     100043516    1 AB                     141.764,84 
    39 433110     100043516    2 AB       D             141.764,84-
    Is it possible to get clearing document without line items, like here:
    433010     1500021212   1 KZ                   18.360,12     100050060
    433010     1500021213   1 KZ                    7.080,00      100050060
    433010     1500021219   1 KZ                    1.300,58      100050060
    433010     1500021223   1 KZ                      416,00       100050060
    433010     1900018975   1 KR                   18.360,12-    100050060
    433010     1900018976   1 KR                      416,00-      100050060
    433010     1900018978   1 KR                    1.300,58-     100050060
    433010     1900018979   1 KR                    7.080,00-     100050060
    where clearing document 100050060 doesn't contain any line items.
    In the first example, why system, during clearing, produce line items in AB document when alll happens on the same GL account?

    Hi,
    Clearing :
    1) Manual Clearing :
    Manually you have to select the line items and clear invoice with the bank line item - in this case payment document is the clearing document
    or
    Manually select the two open line items (both dr & cr), clear the line item. -  In this case there won't be any line item but you will have a seperate clearing document. Here either dr. line item / cr. line item are not the clearing document.
    2) Automatic Clearing :
    Using the F110 - in this case payment document is the clearing document
    or
    Using F.13 - selects one dr.line item & one cr. line item with as per the clearing criteria and clears the document using the clearing document, which doesn't have any line item
    VVR

  • G/L Account for Bank Clearing Account

    Hi:
    Quick question: when we post TBB1, Treasury creates payment requests (table PAYRQ) with entries in field BKHBK, data element PRQ_BKHBK. This field is normally empty and F111 should pickup corresponding GL account from T042Y (FBZP: Bank Determination). But in our case, because Treasury passes this account during TBB1, it's being picked up and conflicting with T042Y.
    So my question is: how do I deactivate Treasury to not pass this account to payment request? Or how do I change it's value within treasury so it would match with Bank Determination value?
    This field in PAYRQ is called G/L Account for Bank Clearing Account.
    Thanks,
    JS

    Yes, it does not post to GL but it does identify Bank Clearing GL account when it's posted which is recorded at BKHBK field of PAYRQ. F111 gets 'confused' and throws error message when this value does not match with corresponding entry in T042Y. How to deactivate it?
    Other way of solving this problem would be if I can identify separate Gl account for incoming and outgoing payments bank clearing account. I know it's defined in Account Determination (table TRACV_ACCSYMBREP). It's Account Symbol 3 (Bank Clearing). There we have masked GL account as "++++3". This account is used for clearing of incoming payments. And for outgoing payments we use "++++5"
    Thanks,
    JS
    Edited by: JSmithYahiya on Jan 19, 2012 5:46 PM

  • F-32: document Splitting generates lines with alternating +/-signs

    Hi Sap Guru,
    While clearing the Customer in F-32, user is getting  error as document Splitting generates lines with alternating +/-signs. It is happening only for few customers.
    Please advice me what could be the reason for the same.
    Thanks,
    Manya

    Hi
    Could you explain what the entrie it is generating (you can simulate and observe) and for which accounts it is behaving ubnormal.
    with regards
    siva

  • Accounts hit during different MM transactions

    Could anybody help in knowing the accounts hit during below transactions in MM.
    With Std price method of valuation, during different scenarios - GR, IR & Payment
    Normal procurement from vendor - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    STO between plants - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    STO between co codes - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    Subcontracting - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference, accounting of bi product & scrap
    Consignment - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    With MAP method of valuation, during different scenarios - GR, IR & Payment
    Normal procurement from vendor - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    STO between plants - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    STO between co codes - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    Subcontracting - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference, accounting of bi product & scrap
    Consignment - accounts debited, credited, accounts hit in case of price difference
    Thanks
    Muralidharan B

    Hi,
    For Domestic Procurement of Raw Material
                During GR
    Material Stock             Dr.
    GR/IR clearing                        Cr.
                During Excise Invoice Credit            
    Cenvat Account          Dr.
    Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
                During Invoice Verification
    Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
    GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
    Vendor Payable                      Cr.
    For Import Procurement of Raw Material
                During Customs Duty Clearing invoice
    Custom Clearing         Dr.
    Custom Payable                      Cr.
                During GR
    Material Stock             Dr.
    GR/IR clearing                        Cr.
                During Excise Invoice Credit            
    Cenvat Account          Dr.      
    Custom Clearing                     Cr.
                During Invoice Verification
    GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
    Vendor Payable                      Cr.
    For Excise Duty Credit of Raw Material without PO
    Cenvat Account          Dr.      
    Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
    For Excise Duty Reversal through Excise JV
    Cenvat Clearing          Dr.      
    Cenvat Account                      Cr.
    What should be my accounting entry when the goods are issued through MM and excise invoice is created (J1IS & J1IV)?
    During Excise Invoice Creation
    Cenvat Suspense Account      Dr.
    Cenvat payable                                   Cr.
    For TR6C Challan
    PLA Account              Dr.
    PLA on hold Account             Cr.
    During Fortnightly  Utilization
    Cenvat payable            Dr.
    Cenvat Account                      Cr.
    PLA Account                          Cr.
    Note: Cenvat Suspense Account should be cleared appropriately using FI JV's.
    What should be my accounting entry in subcontracting reversal / Recredit?
    For Subcontracting Challan Reversal
    Cenvat Reversal          Dr.
    Cenvat Account                      Cr.
    For Subcontracting Challan Recredit
    Cenvat Account          Dr.
    Cenvat Reversal                      Cr.
    pherasath

  • Electronic bank statement MT940 post with FB05

    Hi expert,
    I am configuring Electronic bank statement with MT940 (field 86 unstructure) format and when i upload the text file in FF_5. The system will post to FB01 but i would like to post FB05 and searching for vendor open item and make clearing.
    My text file as below:
    :20:20100524
    :25:50070010/10000100
    :28C:20210/05
    :60F:D100524EUR346
    :61:100524DX50NC01//CHQ
    :86:C01?20?1500000002?145001
    :62F:D100524EUR396
    Please advice which field or word i need to change to post with FB05?
    Thanks.
    regards,
    ng chong chuan

    hi  Anand Raichura,
    7 Clear deb.subledg.ac & 8 Clear cred.subl.acct is maintain in create account symbols? or assign accounts to account symbol? or create keys for posting rules? or define posting rules? or create transaction type? or assign external transaction types to posting rules? or assign bank account to transaction types?
    Beside, is my text file as below is correct? or need to add some word to define on FB05 vendor clearing?
    :20:20100524
    :25:50070010/10000100
    :28C:20210/05
    :60F:D100524EUR346
    :61:100524DX50NC01//CHQ
    :86:C01?20?1500000002?145001
    :62F:D100524EUR396
    thanks.
    regards,
    ng chong chuan

  • Error while importing N Accounts to 1 Address with UCM Batch Manager

    Hi,
    I got a problem with importing Accounts using the UCM Batch Manager. Previous steps were loading the EIM Tables EIM_UCM_ORG and EIM_UCM_ADRPER. To associate addresses I used the column EIM_UCM_ADRPER.PAR_UCM_ACCNT_UID. No errors occured during an Enterprise Integration Mgr jobs to load the data into SDH tables.
    The error described below occurs if I have N Accounts using one Address. Example:
    h5. Account Name --> City --> Postal Code --> State --> Street
    Account #1 --- Munich --- 80331 --- N/A --- Some Street 1
    Account #2 --- Munich --- 80331 --- N/A --- Some Street 1
    h5. If I try to get the Accounts into the Base tables using the UCM Batch Manager I get the following message from the log file:
    ObjMgrBusCompLog     Error     1     000003084c571160:0     2010-08-03 19:11:14     (odbccon.cpp (2097)) SBL-DBC-00111: An error has occurred writing to a record.
    Please continue or ask your systems administrator to check your application configuration if the problem persists.
    DBCLog     DBCLogError     1     000003084c571160:0     2010-08-03 19:11:14     SQLError: [23000],[Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Cannot insert duplicate key row in object 'dbo.S_ADDR_PER'-Objekt with unique index 'S_ADDR_PER_U1'.
    DBCLog     DBCLogError     1     000003084c571160:0     2010-08-03 19:11:14     SQLError: [01000],[Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]The statement has been terminated.
    ObjMgrBusCompLog     Error     1     000003084c571160:0     2010-08-03 19:11:14     (sqlobj.cpp (43735)) SBL-DAT-00381: A record that contains identical values to the record you have created already exists.
    If you would like to enter a new record, please ensure that the field values are unique.
    ObjMgrLog     Error     1     000003084c571160:0     2010-08-03 19:11:14     (adptutils.cpp (5715)) SBL-EAI-04381: For instance of Integration Component 'Account_Business Address', using user key '[City] = "Munich" AND [Postal Code] = "80331" AND [State] = "N/A" AND [Street Address] = "Some Street 1"', a record with identical values already exists in the Siebel database.
    Please ensure that the field values in the input message are unique.
    EAISiebAdpt     EAISiebAdptErr     1     000003084c571160:0     2010-08-03 19:11:15     [0] For instance of Integration Component 'Account_Business Address', using user key '[City] = "Munich" AND [Postal Code] = "80331" AND [State] = "N/A" AND [Street Address] = "Some Street 1"', a record with identical values already exists in the Siebel database.
    Please ensure that the field values in the input message are unique.(SBL-EAI-04381) (0x75017d)
    h5. Result:
    Account #1 gets inserted with Record Type: "Source-Insert"
    Account #2 will not be imported and gets Record Type: "Incomplete"
    Does anyone know how to handle this problem?
    Many Thanks
    Sebastian
    Edited by: user13098670 on 04.08.2010 06:34

    I have selected the option
    Add new metadata and replace existing objetcs. But it is not importing. Also I tried other options like
    1. deleting the existing mapping and tried.
    2. Putting the mapping in recycle bin and try.
    3. Take it from recycle bin.Even during taking it from recycle it is giving me the following error .
    Error occurred importing mapping
    <DWH_CMMDTY_INVC_FACT_MAP/DWH_CMMDTY_INVC_FACT_MAP>
    (at line 141).
    Detailed Error Message:
    API2014: Internal Error: Error in createStage:
    In above all cases it is giving me the error.
    Could you please help?

  • Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

    When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
    Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
    Message no. AU133
    Please help me to rectify the same.
    Thanks in advance
    Deepak

    HI
    Please pay attention at  the possible causes of message AU133:
    1. Error AU133:
       a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
    structure.
       b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
    2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not  permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct               
       (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
       for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
    3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
    4.Check if you need  revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
      -Revaluation acquis. and production costs
      -Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
    Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
    the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
    Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
    Please assign points if it useful.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Payment order clearing with EBS in SAP

    Hi All,
    I am little confused with Payment order clearing with EBS. Actually the process is as below.
    1. We create an invoice for Vendor - FB60 / MIRO
    2. We make the payment through F110, which creates a payment order but this will not post the payment document. Here, the payment order will be generated for payment ref.
    We should clear that Invoice by uploading the EBS.
    I have created a posting rule as below
    Posting rule Z092
    Posting Area 1
    Debit side
    Posting key 25
    Acc Symbol (Debit) - Blank
    Credit side
    Posting key 50
    Acc Symbol (Credit) - Main Bank Account
    Document type - KZ
    Posting type - 1
    Assigned Ext. Trans. Type to posting rule as below
    Ext. Trans. Type 702    +   Posting rule Z092    Interpretation Alog - 29
    The below is the error i am getting while uploading the EBS stmt in FF_5
    I am getting the error saying "Error: (F5 104) Vendor * is not defined in company code XXXX".
    The Accounting entry should be
    Dr  Vendor   A/C
    Cr  Main Bank A/C

    Hi Raju ,
    The Problem seems to be that the payment order number is extended with your company code number due to which the system is not recognizing your payment order. Give one more try by just entering the payment order number and deleting the co code and year after that, just like below.
    88,0000002157
    88,/06590719801706 0000002157
    88,0000002157
    Thanks,
    Suresh

  • Clearing with customer & Vendor

    I have customer who is vendor and vendor who is customer.I have assigned customer no in vendor master and vice versa. I forgot to click the indication Clearing with cust/vend. I have posted the TRansactions now i Have ticked the Clearing with cust/ Vend.
    How to i Set off line item with cust and vendor .
    One more thing is in f-32 clear customer we can clear clearing doc. or we can clear open item also and sett off customer and vendor.
    As per my knowledge if u do partial payment then my orginal Invoice wil show as open item and one more line item wil b generated with clearing document M I right? Is there any setting in ECC 6. through which partial payment will directly get cleared.
    plz need some input regardin clearing doucment
    I have tried but unable to come to conclusion
    thanks thanks a lot
    Regards
    Anamika

    Anamika
    The whole logic of having a partial item is that the open item will remain open until the whole amount is paid. There is no meaning in clearing it completely when there is a partial clearing. For the customer clearing, you select other accounts, select the vendor account and the account type K and clear the open items. Let me know if it helped.
    Karthik

  • Addition of G/L items in Accounting Document during creationof Material Doc

    Hi All
    I am looking for User exit or BADI that allows me to add additional G/L line items (offsets) in Accounting Document during creation of Material Document. I wish to do this when I save Material document in MIGO, MB01 or MIRO.
    Has anyone done this before? Is there any user exit, badi or function module to do this. Please share insight on this situation.
    Thanks in advance
    Sunny

    Hi,
      check out BADI MB_DOCUMENT_BADI this would trigger before and during update task while posting Material documents i think you can ful fill your requirement with this.
    Regards,
    Himanshu

Maybe you are looking for