TRM  - system is not considering variable interest rates

While creating an interest rate instrument in (TRM - Money Market), Tab u201Cstructureu201D with a variable interest rate, when I check in u201CCash flowu201D tab for the interest rates applied appears zero. The system is not considering the interest rate although this information is included in S_ALR_87008537 - Enter Reference Interest Rates.
The variable interest rate our client is using is EURIBOR one month (EURIBEUR01).
Can anyone help me with this?
Thanks in advance,
Daniel

Hi Daniel,
For updating cash flow with Ref Int Rate, please caryout following:
a. In customization, company code general settings, make Ref Int Rate update automatically.
or
b. If you have not set this indicator, kindly update your contract with Tcode TJ09.
I hope this will solve your problem.
Regards
Prasad AV

Similar Messages

  • Variable Interest Rate Instrument scenario

    Dear All,
    Is it possible to create an Interest Rate Instrument with variable interest rate which is calculated and adjusted monthly but interest amount is paid quarterly.
    As per my understanding creating Interest Rate Instrument with Variable Interest Rate and which is adjusted monthly is not a problem. But if we do that the system calculates interest monthly and tries to post it monthly and also creates payment Request for each monthly cash flow.
    This is the issue we want the system to calculate the interest monthly and also want that monthly accruals are calculated correctly but we want the interest to be paid quarterly and not monthly.
    Request your thoughts on this kind of scenario.
    Thank You
    Regards
    Sachin

    Hi,
    In your IRI instrument, maintain the interest condition to have a quarterly payout.  In the structure tab, click on the conditions and then click on interest rate adjustment condition. In that you can specify the interest rate condition item to adjust to monthly update.  Thus you can perform interest rate adjustments on a monthly basis and have the interest payout on a quarterly basis.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • No Variable Interest Rate ot in new product copied from 55A

    Hello
    I have created new product typep by copying the product type 55A. While all the config seems to be coeect and the product type is also posting all the entries correctly, the product type does not show the variable interest rate option in the drop down when creating the in TM_51.
    The condition type for interest is a copy of 1200 condition type so should not be a problem.
    Please advise how to resolve this.
    Best Compliments
    S
    Edited by: sapcounts on Dec 19, 2011 1:00 PM
    I was missing condition type 1120

    Hi ,
    In addition to the condition type 1200 (Nominal interest ) it is necesary to copy the condition type  1210 for interest rate adjustment , then it will display the interst rate adjustment in the structure tab of the Interest rate instrument .

  • System is not considering Planned Delivery time

    Dear Gurus,
    As iam planning for the month of January and running the MRP,schedulelines are getting generated but system is not condering Planned Delivery time maintained in the material master ie. 7days.Following is the example:
    I have a FERT-X with a component A-1PC in its BOM and its planned delvery time from vendor is 7 Days.If iam running the MRP on 13/12/2010 for FERT-X  100 PCS for January1,2011 then the schedule lines are getting generated for for component A is on 01/01/2011.But PDT is maintianed in material master is 7 days and same has been maintianed in vendor inforecord.But system is not considering it.
    Kindly help to resolve the issue.
    With Regards.

    I have one ROH which has two different vendors.
    Two scheduling Agreemnt with target qty 100000 kg each.
    Two different Vendor info record with Min. order qty maintained.V1-1000Kg,V2-6000Kg.
    One source list with two vendors and with respective scheduling agreement.
    Quota arrangement is there in which SOB is maintiained 50:50.
    I hv the requirement of 3084 kg of ROH.
    I run the MRP and two diiferent schedule lines are getting generated with 50:50 qty as mentioned in Quota arrangement.
    Not considering the minimum order qty maintiained in vendor info record.
    The above process is correct
    Only One doubt In Quota Arrangement?
    IS two schedule line is created after MRP run?
    Generally System will  select a vendor Whose Quota value is less
    quota rating   = quota base quantity + quota-allocated quantity/ quota
    Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Dec 14, 2010 3:26 PM

  • The system is not considering the free stock in planning strategy grp - 25

    Dear Frndz,
    The system is not considering the free stock of child items available in the system.For the parent item, I have maintained a planning srategy of 25 (Make to order variant config).My client would like the system to consider the free stock available for child items.pls help me...
    Regards,
    Srini

    Dear,
    Strategy 25 will not consider the existing stock.
    What you enter in MRP4 view ind/collective rquirement is applicable only for dependent requirement.
    Also refer this thread?
    Re: Strategy group 20
    Run MRP in MD50 and then MD02 with palnning mode 3 deleted and recreated and check your result.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • System is not considering open reservations at the time of next MRP Run

    Hi,
    In our business process, subcontractors are defind as Vendors in the SAP system and materials will be provided / transfered to these subcontractors in the SAP system through Subcontracting route (541 movement type). Now, business wants to 'Monitor' the stocks at these subcontractors, so that always subcontractors should have the Optimum stocks at his location. So to monitor the same, business wants to have the MRP / CBP process in the SAP system.
    To run the MRP for all these Subcontractors at each material level following configuration and Master data is maintained in the SAP:
    Business is having around 10 plants in the SAP system and all these plants are defined as MRP Areas in the SAP system to run MRP. Along with this subcontractors (100 Subcontractors) are defined as MRP Areas (100 MRP areas) in the SAP system and each MRP Area (subcontractors) are mapped in the MRP Area configuraion according to the respective above mentioned plants in the SAP system.
    At the time of running the MRP for these MRP areas in the SAP system based on Re-order point and Max stock level (both at subcontractors MRP Area and Plant MRP Area Level), system will consolidate the requirement from all the subcontractors MRP Areas (Transfer Reservation) to at plant level. From plant a considering all these requirement + warehouse buffer stock, a Purchase Requisition will be raised to procure the material from other plant or from external vendor.
    Suppose, if the requirements of the previous MRP run are not fulfilled in the SAP system, and if MRP is run again in the SAP system at both Subcontractor MRP Area and Plant MRP Area Level, the system will delete the Previous "TRANSFER RESERVATIONS" and Recreate the new one. The problem here is suppose eventhough the Transfer Reservation requirements are partially fulfilled, a new reservation is Re-created in the SAP system in the next MRP run and this will create the Incorrect results in the MRP results/requirements.
    So, can you please suggest what can done for this problem?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Pavan

    Please use the planning option - delete and re create ...which will balance the net requirement

  • Tax not considered during Quotation Comparison

    Dear Buddies,
    I have created an RFQ and maintained different condition types (e.g. disc.,frieght,packaging etc.) and also entered tax code.
    However, during Quotation comparison ME49 the system did not consider the tax rates.Is this the standard system behavior that during quotation comparison tax code is ignored for calculation and if this holds true why is the tax code option given in quotation ?
    My client needs taxes also to be included during quotation comparison.
    Awaiting reply,
    Cheers !
    Sachin Narvekar

    Hi,
    IMG > Materials management > Purchasing > RFQ/Quotation > Define Screen Lay-out at Document Level
    Once you click the last path, look for T. code ME47 and highlight it.
    Then click for the Details button.
    Once clicking the Details button, look for the field selection GR/IR Control then double click it.
    There is a Tax Code field in there.
    You can either select (tick the check box) it as required or optional.
    Then if you go back to ME47 and click the Item Details button in the application tool bar, the Tax Code will automatically appear.

  • Interest Rate Instruments in Treasury

    Hello SAP Gurus
    We are using SAP Treasury Product (55A u2013 Interest Rate Instrument) to meet one of our business requirements. We are creating Investment deal/contract with a variable interest. We are also maintaining the Interest Rate Values in transaction code JBIRM on daily basis.
    The business requirement is here that they want to calculate the interest value on daily as per rate maintained in transaction code JBIRM and pay on Monthly Basis.
    If I am selecting the frequency monthly in Interest Structure Tab and executing transaction code TJ05 to update the interest rate in the deal/Contract.  It is not updating correctly. It is taking only one interest rate not alls.
    If I set frequency Daily in Interest Structure Tab and executing transaction code TJ05 to update the interest rate in the deal/Contract.  It is updating correctly. But the Issue is here that than it is creating interest accounting entry on daily basis. We do not want to create Interest Entry on Daily.
    Could you please help me to update the interest rate on daily basis and calculate the Interest Value accordingly and ay on Monthly?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Amit Kumar Jain

    To calculate interest based on a daily rate, but only post interest monthly, you have to maintain the interest and interest rate adjustment conditions with different frequencies.
    In the deal, click on the conditions button. You should see a condition 1200 - Nominal interest and because you have used a variable interest rate, you should also see a condition 1210 - Interest rate adjustment. To post interest monthly, you need to set the Nominal interest (1200) condition to Regular update with Frequency of 1 Month. To enter daily interest rates, you need to also set the Interest rate adustment (1210) to Regular update, however the frequency should be 1 Calendar day.
    In addition, if you will not have interest rates for weekends and banking holidays, you can set the calendar rule to next or previous working day to and enter a factory calendar that has been configured with weekends and banking holidays as non-working days. Whether you select next or previous working day depends on how the bank calculates interest for the weekends/holidays. For example, if the bank uses the rate from Friday to calculate interest for Saturday and Sunday, you would select previous working day. If however, it uses Monday to calculate the interest, then you would select next working day.
    I'm not clear on the issue you are experiencing with TJ05. Can you explain furthe rwhat you mean when you say that it is taking only one interest rate, not all?
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Example of hedge accounting for interest rate risk

    Hello
    Can anyoe give an example of hedge accounting for interest rate risk with values using a variable interest rate bond and a interest rate swap where a prospective and retrospective effectiveness test would be positive?
    Thanks,
    Arjan

    not precisely - the respective flow is still in status 'S' @ TPM13, so in this sense it looks consistent. what is though strange that if you look into the tab 'Cash flow' in the Posting view, you can see a status 'Interest rate not adjusted for flow', though there is interest adjustment executed as per the screenshot attached.
    /Renatas

  • Target sost calculation not considered Current cost estimate in KKBC_ORD

    Hi All,
    We have an case wherein it observed that target cost calculation on SFG is wrong
    in KKBC_ORD where system does not considered the current cost estimate.
    We have all the necessayry customisation in place for Target cost version 0 for current cost estimate.
    Below is detailsed case.
    1 Process Order created in Dec 2011
    2 Price Released to Mat master  on 01.01.2012
    3 Goods movement,Operation confirmad Material Issues, FG qty delivered @ std cost 0n 04.01.2012
    4 Order Technically completed (TECO)
    5 KKS1/KKS2 will be done at month end.
    We know that In Process order, after deliver of FG the target cost on FG is not getting calculated,target cost will be updated only after calculating variance. it does
    not calculate after delivery of finished goods, On Execution of KKS1/KKS2  variance will be calculated the target cost on FG and will be updated.
    In process  order (COR3 --> Cost analysis) Target cost ,Actual cost and Planned cost are calculated based on the following:
    Total Plan Cost = Std Cost the material required to Produce X Planned Qty of the required material
    Target Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Std Qty of material required to produce, for Produced Actual Qty
    Actual Cost = Std Cost the material planned to Produce X Actual Qty of material consumed, for Produced Actual Qty
    The variance is calculated on SFG and assemblies based on the difference between actual and target cost in KKBC_ORD. During creation of process order, the plan cost
    will be updated with the valid standard cost upon the creation.
    The target cost on SFG and Assemblies is only generated when there is good receipt from production order into inventory.
    The target cost is generated using the valid / recent costing run for the correspondence SFG in KKBc_ORD.
    All other target costs showed in COR3 (Menu Go to > Costs > Analysis) or KKBC_ORD before doing KKS1/2 is only statistical- However in our case Traget cost calculated
    on SFG in KKBC_ORD not relevant with current cost estimate.
    However Actual cost and Planned cost Calculated correctly.
    Actual Cost= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
    Planned cost= Std Cost the material required to Produce (6.572,12) X Planned Qty (12.415)= 81.592,87
    However Target cost is not considering the current cost estimate;It should be - Current Standard cost of the materilal(5.624,88)X Target Qty(13.958,124)=78512.07.
    But Errorneously Target cost is showing 67.383,59 which causing unfavorable variance to standard.
    It should be 78512.07-77.021,48= 1490.59 favourable var to standard in KKBC_ORD.
    Any help,suggestion and input would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks with Regards
    Subrata

    hi
    target cost is your standard cost* actual confirmed quantity, not the standard quantity required
    the variance calculated will be always  the actual debit to the production order- actual credit of the production order
    your actual credit  for the process order is  std cost* actual quantity delivered to the inventory= Current Standard costof the materilal(5.624,88)X Actual Qty (13.693)=77.021,48
    actual debit to the process order is total actual cost which you can see in COR3 report .
    By the way for which period you have calculated variance, target cost will be calculated based on that months standard cost
    krishna

  • Blocked vendor master (Ordering address) not considered in PO

    Hi Team,
    Recently we have upgraded our system to ECC6 from 4.6. After upgrade,
    the system is not considering the vendor master (Ordering Address) during
    Purchase Order creation if it is blocked at purchase org level under
    alternate data. Whereas it was picking in 4.6 system.
    Kindly provide the reason for such behavior and provide the solution if
    at all we want those blocked vendor codes to be considered.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Please try below SAP note for the same
    Note 1609717 - Vendors with blocked purch orgs are not replicated correctly
    Note 1607331 - Unassign a vendor from its Organizational unit
    Regards,
    Sandesh Sawant

  • Scheduling agreement qty requirement is not considered in V_V2

    Hi Friends,
    We are facing a problem in rescheduling transaction V_V2.  System is not considering the requirement of the confirmed schedule lines of the scheduling agreement while carrying out the ATP in V_V2 and the available qty is allocated to the sales orders.
    Ex: Available Stock : 1000 EA
    1. SA confirmed Qty: 1000
    2. Sales order created for the qty of 1000, system is considering the SA requirement and confirming the SO based on RLT.
    3. When we run ATP in sales order change, system is still considering the SA requirement and not changing the confirmed date.
    4. But when we run the V_V2, system is ignoring the SA and confirming the SO line item with PULL-IN.
    Because of this SO is stealing the stock reserved for the SA. Is there a way to change the behavior of V_V2 similar to VA02, which considers the SA requirement / confirmed qty while rescheduling.
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi Ram,
    Rescheduling of sales documents is item specific. It is not possible to reschedule individual schedule lines of scheduling
    agreements. Each schedule line is displayed but only the open quantity can be rescheduled.
    You can find further information in SDV03V02 documentation.
    The open qty on item level will be checked becasue rescheduling of sales documents (scheduling agreements) is item specific.
    Availability Check in Rescheduling is always on item-level.
    Thanks and best regards,
    Smile

  • Intrastat Report RVEXST00 & RMIMST00 not picking up 'I' Rate

    Hi,
    hope someone could share some insign on this intrastat 'I' rate, we have set-up the intsastat report in our development Box and currently performing some testing, we notice that when we select the intrastat rate from the selection screen the systems does not select the 'I' rate, instead its still selecting the 'E' rate. I am just wondering have anyone enconter the same issue which we are facing.
    in the above example, we have maintain both rates, E rate which we use on a daily basis and also we have created 'I' rate for intrastat. When we execute the report we selected intrastat rate, however the outcome of the report shows the 'E' rate is used and not the 'I' rate.
    Hope someone can share something.
    Regards
    Ken

    Dear Sonni,
    First of all are you sure that the exchange rates are coming correctly from Source to BW.
    If not do the below mentioned procedure.
    RSA1 --> goto source system --> right click on your source system --> select Transfer Exchange Rates --> select the mode of transfer and excute it
    hope it will solve your problem.
    With Regards
    Arun
    Edited by: Arun Aravapalli on Mar 17, 2010 1:08 AM

  • Exempt amount is not considering in IT 195

    Hi,
    SAP has provided an scenario where in IT 195 after adding non exempt rule,we can exempt the amount which need to be garnished by way of clicking the exempt radio button given in the bottom of IT 195 and here you can give how much money to be exempted and how the deduction can take place.
    When i have given this exempt,for example the dedutoin for child support is $ 500 and in that order i am giving exempt as 300 that menans system has to  exempt 300 for garnished amount.if over all garnished amount adding all the oreders are $1000 then system should consider 700 only.
    system is not considering this amount,i checked the log table etc,,system is taking this amount but the end result its not considering.I checked all the required proecessing classes etc,everything is fine.
    I am unable to locate the problem,is there any pack to updated,i am working on ECC 7.0,this is the latest version.
    please let me know if you have any inputs.
    thanks
    kknl

    not sure i never worked on us pay rolls just a guess
    Did u maintained the limit  exempted wage type
    Edited by: Sikindar on Jan 17, 2009 9:44 AM

  • Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MR

    Sir,
    Is there a possibility should not consider available quantity at time of MRP planning?
    Example:
    Available stock: 100
    Planning stock: 100 (MD61)
    Schedule line to be generate: 100 Qty (Exclude the available quantity at time of MRP planning)
    regards,
    sampath

    Dear Sampath/Raj,
    1) Move the stock to particular storage location for which you don't want to be consider by MRP
    2) Now go to OMIR t-code, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
    3) Go to MMSC, input value as 1 for that particular storage location
    4) Go to MRP - 4 view Down you can find field Storage location input value as 1
    5) Now run MRP, system will not consider stock of that particular storage location
    Regards
    Madhu

Maybe you are looking for