Trunking between a Cisco 3548 and a Liksys SRW208p

I am trying to set up trunking between these two switches using .1q. Is this possible and if so how is it done.

No. I nowhere said that. I said you have to put those ports into access mode and not into trunk mode. You can assign three different VLANs to three different ports. You cannot use trunk mode on those ports. You have to use access mode. The computers probably will only send untagged frames. If the port is in trunk mode the computers will send everything to the management vlan!
A port in trunk mode connects to another switch.
A port in access mode connects to a workstation.
The correct setup is for example:
Port 1: Access mode, VLAN 2 untagged, PVID 2, connects to computer1
Port 2: Access mode, VLAN 3 untagged, PVID 3, connects to computer2
Port 3: Access mode, VLAN 4 untagged, PVID 4, connects to computer3
Port 8: Trunk mode, PVID 1, VLAN 2-4 tagged, connects to cisco
The port on the cisco is configured to something like:
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,3,4
switchport mode trunk
Message Edited by gv on 10-26-2007 11:32 PM

Similar Messages

SIP trunking between Microsoft OCS server and Cisco Voice GW router.

Hello All,
I have a client with an existing Microsoft OCS (office communications server) environment with the OCS server in their head office. The OCS clients in the remote Office registers with the OCS server in the head office. The WAN connectivity between the remote office and the Head office is MPLS.I would like to facilitate local call (PSTN) features at the remote site through a newly proposed Voice gateway router.
Can I achieve this by doing a SIP trunk between the OCS server in the head office to the newly proposed voice GW router in the remote office through the existing MPLS link. If yes, Could any one please assist me in this regards or suggest any other best solution to achieve the same.
Thank you in advance,
Mohammed Ameen R

Hi David,
this is a normal behaviour. To CUCM, OCS is a remote destination (just like your mobile phone). When your mobile phone hangs up, the system will put the call on hold for 10 sec.
This is there for the mobile user to go to his desk to pick up the call and continue the conversation (part of single number reach feature)
The best practise will be for the user to ensure that the other party hangs up the call first before he hang up.
Please grade if you think it's useful =)

One Way Calling on Intercluster trunk between 4.1.3 and 3.3.x

We've encoutered a bizarre situation, one which so far even TAC is stumped on.
We just turned up a new site, running 4.1.3SR3b and have set up the usual intercluster trunks (non-gatekeeper) between the new site and our other sites. Most of our other sites are 3.3.4 or 3.3.5. Calls from the other sites to the new 4.1.3 site work fine, but when you try to call from the 4.1.3 site to another site, the phone rings on the receiving end for a split second (not even a full ring), then the calling end gets a fast busy. Detailed traces on both ends show the info getting to the receiving end, but when the call drops, this appears on the sending end:
07/15/2006 11:30:38.499 CCM|StationD: (0000129) DEBUG- star_DSetCallState(6) State of cdpc(337) is 5.|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.40.2.11><CT::0,0,0,0.0><IP::10.12.1.12><DEV::>
07/15/2006 11:30:38.499 CCM|H225D::restart0_TcpStopSessionInd: H225Cdpc(2,100,38,91), ConnPid(2,100,132,258), crv=12, mCiCrCrpEntries=1, mCrtoCiEntries=1|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.40.2.11><CT::0,0,0,0.0><IP::><DEV::>
07/15/2006 11:30:38.499 CCM|Cc::wait_CfDataInd, total fie to handle is 0 |<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.40.2.11><CT::0,0,0,0.0><IP::><DEV::>
07/15/2006 11:30:38.499 CCM|ConnectionManager - wait_AuDisconnectRequest:NO ENTRY FOUND IN TABLE,CI(33555134,33555133),dcType=1,IFCreated(0,0),PID(0-0,0-0),IFHandling(0,0),MCNode(0,0)|<CLID::StandAloneCluster><NID::10.40.2.11><CT::0,0,0,0.0><IP::><DEV::>
We just tried the latest engineering special (63 I believe), but the issue remains. Has anyone encountered this before?
This occurs with either G711 or G729 codecs, with or without MTP's enabled on the intercluster trunks.

Hi,
Did you checked the H245 Options in the CCM trace options?
I dont see any H245 messages in CCM.
I see that this IP Phone (43867) is registered to node 2.
Is this the SUB in PHL cluster?
We sent a H225Setup sent to IP=10.12.1.12
In the other side:
H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd: from IP=10.40.2.11
If this non-gatekeeper-controlled intercluster trunk accesses the device pool of a remote non-gatekeeper-controlled intercluster trunk and that device pool has a second Cisco CallManager node, you must enter the second remote Cisco CallManager IP address/host name in this field. (ie. Cluster1 4 servers and Cluster2 2 servers
ICT1 has a CCM Group which contains 3 servers.
ICT2 has a CCM Group which contains the 2 servers
In ICT1 you need to enter the 2 server's IP addresses.
In ICT2 you need to enter the 3 server's IP addresses)
Make sure the order is correct.
In the incoming cluster I see IP Phone is registered to node 3.
Node selection for outgoing calls is controlled by which node the originating endpoint is registered with. If the originating endpoint is registered to the same node as the H.323 Trunk, the call is signaled from that node. If the originating endpoint is not registered to the same node as the H.323 trunk, a random selection is made between all nodes configured with the H.323 trunk
This error is the one which terminates the call taken from SDL in CCM SUB 3.
SdlSig-I | CcDisconnReq | restart0 | StationD(3,100,92,87) | LineControl(1,100,37,2258) | (1,100,101,34868).1-(*:*) | [NP - HP: 0, NP: 0, LP: 0, VLP: 0, LZP: 0] Cause=41
Temporary failure (cause code 41)
Normally this happens when GW, in this case the ICT is not registered correctly.
In CCM PHL, I see this:.
000221594| 06/07/15 11:30:38.499| 002| SdlSig | TcpStopSessionInd | restart0 | H225D(2,100,39,33) | H225Handler(2,100,40,1) | (0,0,0,0).0-(*:*) | [R:NP - HP: 0, NP: 0, LP: 0, VLP: 0, LZP: 0 DBP: 0] PID=(0,0,0,0)
000221595| 06/07/15 11:30:38.499| 002| SdlSig | TcpStopSessionInd | call_received7 | H225Cdpc(2,100,38,91) | H225D(2,100,39,33) | (0,0,0,0).0-(*:*) | [R:NP - HP: 0, NP: 0, LP: 0, VLP: 0, LZP: 0 DBP: 0] PID=(0,0,0,0)
This means that TCP connection was ended. By checking the SDL looks like destination node send a RST at TCP level and thats why call finishes. But problem seems to be the CMH cluster.
If ICT configuration is fine I would reboot|restart ccm.exe service in the CMH cluster.
If after that it doesnt work I would open a TAC case so we can get access and check whats going on.
HTH
//G

Trunks between 2950s stop working and wont come back

I've seen this happen on 2 different 'pairs' of 2950s, so it's time to investigate. The scenareo:
simple trunk (no vlan definitions) between 2 2950s. 1 switch looses power, when power is restored, the switch that didn't lose power doesn't pass any traffic. The interface is up (link and administrativly up) the logs don't show anything other than the interface went down and came back up. here's a sample port:
interface FastEthernet0/23
description new Feed from phone room switch
switchport mode trunk
no ip address
I'm not using spanning-tree, there aren't any redunant paths. Its worked fine for months (until a ups failure), I set up a new port on the switch and swing the cable and it comes up. Any ideas?
thanks!

Hello,
I know this is an old post... but I am posting here in case this is viewed by anyone with a possible solution.
Our organization has multiple locations configured the same way:
(x2) cross connected 2950 switches in trunk mode, configured the follwing way per each interface (fa0/19):
interface FastEthernet0/19
no ip address
duplex full
speed 100
no cdp enable
spanning-tree portfast
Our problem is similar to the one explained in this initial post. The switches are auto-trunked via port #19.
Let's call one switch "A" and one switch "B"
Whenever power is removed from one of the switches (Switch A), and it has completed a restart, the opposite switch (Switch B ..the one which was not powered off) will not return to a "Trunked" state. When you run the "show int status" command, it shows that the port is "connected". Even though the switch which was initially restarted returns to "Trunked" mode.
We have seen this with a few of our 2950's across the infrastructure.
The bottom line is that restarting one of the switches causes the other to lose the trunked state. The only was to correct the issue is to restart the opposite switch as well.
The IOS version is 12.1 (9) EA1d .. I know it's old, however we cannot upgrade it at this time due to policies within the organization.
Could anybody shed some light on this?
Thanks in advance..

Trunk between CUCM 9.1 and panasonic kxtde600

hello, my name is Diego.
I need to make calls between my CUCM 9.1 to a pbx Panasonic KX TDE600, someone could help me?
any documentation that can help me?
thank you very much.

Hi Diego.
That model of PBX is SIP/H323 enabled.
So on CUCM you can setup a sip trunk pointing to it.
Read this useful post https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2131009
HTH
Regards
Carlo
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

InterVlan Trunking between Catalyst 500 Express and Router 1841

Hello,
I am currently attempting to configure 2 VLANs on a Router 1841 and allow them to communication with my Catalyst 500 Express switch. The Router Setup is simple
its 3 Sub-ints on the FE0/0 interface.
interface FastEthernet0/0
description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-FE 0$
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/0.1
description *** ADMINISTERING VLAN ***
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 10.19.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/0.2
description *** DATA VLAN ***
encapsulation dot1Q 2
ip address 10.19.2.1 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/0.3
description *** VOICE VLAN ***
encapsulation dot1Q 3
ip address 10.19.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.19.2.2
FE 0/0 Port on the Router is connected to port 24 on my Catalyst. I set the Smartport on port 24 of the Catalyst to be Router for trunking purposes
I get a notification error on the Catalyst saying "Undersized frames detected from the connected device" (which is my ROUTER).
does anyone have a suggestion? Or Is it supported this scenario?
Thanks,
Eduardo

I had the same issue when I was working on CE500s and a WLC.
In the CE500 Device Manager, go to Configure->VLANs
Create your VLAN 2 and 3.
Then go back to smartports, click customize, and verify that VLAN-1 is default (native).
Sending information through a port on the CE500 that it is not expecting will set alerts in the log.
Hope this helps.
RB

Dot1q trunk between WS-C3548-XL and WS-C2950G-48-EI

Cdp works , but no IP traffic.
Vlan active on both sides.
Its a provider xdsl layer 2 link.
Any ideas ?
Regards Bjornarsb

cdp works both ways.
sh int trunk is only supported on one end:
#sh interfaces trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/1 on 802.1q trunking 1
Fa0/2 on 802.1q trunking 1
Fa0/47 on 802.1q trunking 1
Fa0/48 on 802.1q trunking 1
Gi0/1 on 802.1q trunking 1
Gi0/2 on 802.1q trunking 1

Trunking between 2960X and 3560G

I am trying to trunk between a Cisco 2960X and a 3560G switch. The 2960X has a 10gig (SFP) interface and the 3560G has a 1gig (SFP) interface. Can I do this with 1gig SFP modules? If so what is the configuration on both switches because I can't get them to come up. This what I have.
2960X config
interface TenGigabitEthernet3/0/2
switchport mode trunk
3560G config
interface GigabitEthernet0/28
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk

I looked at my 2960X, but I don't have one that has a 1Gig-Module in a SFP+ slot. But at least it is documented to work:
The SFP+ slots support both SFP and SFP+ modules
Are you sure you don't have just a send/receive mismatch? Sometimes the easy things are the hardest to find ... ;-)

CUCM - trunking between 7 and 9

Hi,
Document needed to do a trunking between cucm 7 and cucm 9 ( intercluster trunking)
We are planning to route a PSTN call from IP phones which are registerd with old CUCM on version 7 from our new cucm 9 which has FXO- line active.
how do I achive it.
Regards

Hello
You have to use intercluster non-gatekeeper controlled . I do nothink there is special document for this , but you can see the below link:-
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11766291/intercluster-sip-trunk-between-cucm-version-71-and-91
Thanks
please rate all useful ifnromation

Clear Channel Codec between Cisco GW and Patton Smartnode

Hi,
i have to establish an H.323 connection between an Cisco 3745 and an Patton
Smartnode 1200 with clear-channel codec to support ISDN-Data over VoIP.
PC with ISDN-Card---S0/PattonGW----H.323----3745/E1----PSTN
Software versions:
Cisco: SPServices 12.4(5a)
Patton SN1200: R3.20 2006-03-30 H323
The call establishment is sucessfull but i am not able pass any Data over
ISDN. Does anyone got this working?
Any help is welcome.
Regards,
Robert
Below are some Konfig sniplets:
Cisco:
controller E1 0/1/0
pri-group timeslots 1-31
interface Serial0/1/0:15
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-net5
isdn overlap-receiving
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
no cdp enable
dial-peer voice 10 pots
description ----- Towards PSTN -----
answer-address <removed>
destination-pattern 0T
progress_ind setup enable 3
fax rate disable
direct-inward-dial
port 0/1/0:15
dial-peer voice 473997246 voip
description ----- towards Patton GW -----
destination-pattern <removed>
progress_ind setup enable 3
modem passthrough nse codec g711alaw
session target ipv4:192.168.1.28
codec clear-channel bytes 80
ip qos dscp cs5 media
no vad
dial-peer voice 473997247 voip
description ----- Incoming Dial-Peer -----
modem passthrough nse codec g711alaw
incoming called-number <removed>
codec clear-channel bytes 80
ip qos dscp cs5 media
no vad
Patton:
profile voip VOIP
codec 1 transparent-cisco rx-length 20 tx-length 20
no high-pass-filter
no post-filter
no dtmf-relay
no dtmf-mute-encoder
context ip router
rtp-port-range 16384 32767
context cs switch
no digit-collection timeout
no address-completion timeout
interface h323 IF_H323
bind gateway GW_H323
route call dest-interface IF_S0_01
remote 192.168.254.30 1720
itc rx transparent
use profile voip VOIP
interface isdn IF_S0_01
route call dest-interface IF_H323
use profile tone-set Europe
no call-waiting
gateway h323 GW_H323
faststart
early-h245
h235-security version v2
no h235-security q931-auth-int
bind interface IF_IP_LAN router
no shutdown
use profile voip VOIP
port bri 0 1
clock auto
encapsulation q921
q921
protocol pmp
uni-side auto
encapsulation q931
q931
protocol dss1
uni-side net
encapsulation cc-isdn
bind interface IF_S0_01 switch

The SIP Media Inactivity Timer feature enables Cisco gateways to monitor and disconnect VoIP calls if no Real-Time Control Protocol (RTCP) packets are received within a configurable time period.
When RTCP reports are not received by a Cisco gateway, the SIP Media Inactivity Timer feature releases the hung session and its network resources in an orderly manner. These network resources include the gateway digital signal processor (DSP) and time-division multiplexing (TDM) channel resources that are utilized by the hung sessions. Because call signaling is sent to tear down the call, any stateful SIP proxies involved in the call are also notified to clear the state that they have associated with the hung session. The call is also cleared back through the TDM port so that any attached TDM switching equipment also clears its resources.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/prod_troubleshooting_guide09186a00801fa207.html#wp2077496

VLAN Trunking with SRW2024 & Cisco 2924

Hi, I'm trying to trunk between my Cisco and Linksys switches but its not working as expected. I have 2 vlans on the Cisco VLAN1 & 2. I have set one port on each switch as a trunk and connected them together. This appears to work for VLAN1. I can't seem to get VLAN2 devices to see each other. I think this is because I am from a Cisco background and can't quite work out what the Linksys is trying to tell me or why its so difficult to force a port to a VLAN other than 1. I've tried the manual/help, but this only reiterates the "help" on the web interface, which isn't "help" but more of a dictionary of terms. What I really want it to do is to force all packets arriving at a port to VLAN2 (in much the same way a switchport access vlan does on the Cisco), and for those to be trunked to the cisco to access the other VLAN2 devices. What's the trick for doing this? Thanks, Julian.

1. The VLAN configuration of the SRW looks good.
2. Which port on the Cisco do you connect to? I guess it is the FE0/1.
3. You have to configure trunk mode on the fe0/1 port. Default is access mode. On my router I have manually added vlans. But I think the Cisco (in contrast to the Linksys) by default will accept all vlans unless configured otherwise. In summary: add the first and maybe the second line to FE0/1
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2
4. Is there a VLAN router in the setup to provide internet for those VLANs?
5. How does VLAN 2 get its IP addresses? Do you have a separate DHCP server for VLAN 2?

How to create multiple sip trunks between cucm and cisco unified sip proxy

Dear Expert,
Is there a way to create multiple sip trunks between CUCM and Cisco Unified SIP Proxy (CUSP)? How to achieve it without creating multiple IP interfaces on the CUSP module.
CUCM: 8.5.1.10000-9
CUSP: 8.5.2
Thank you,
.wan

Hello Michael,
This SIP trunk is part of UCCE solution, which used between CVP, CUSP, and CUCM.
The requirements:
1) To have different codecs for different type of calls, as the phones are at few countries
2) To pass different number of digits from CUSP to CUCM for different call treatments
.wan

Trunk between Cisco Catalyst and DLINK DES-7210

Hi,
i would like to configure a Trunk with all VLANs between a Cisco Catalyst 3650 an a DLINK DES-7210.
On the DLINK is the def. GW via VRRP defined.
Now i get the following Error:
%ARP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 172.28.72.1 on interface VLAN 72 port TenGigabitEthernet 5/3, sourced by 24e9.b397.2c34
This is the Uplink Interface on the Cisco Switch.
What can cause this?
here`s the config of the Cisco Port:
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
load-interval 30
udld port disable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
end
sh inter trunk
Port        Mode             Encapsulation Status        Native vlan
Te1/1/4     on               802.1q         trunking      1
Port        Vlans allowed on trunk
Te1/1/4     1-4094
Port        Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Te1/1/4     1,8,12,16,20-24,32,36,40,44,48,56,64,68,72,76,80,88,92,96,201,211,239-242,244-249,260,264,268,1212,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1234,1236,1240,1244,1248,1252,1256,1260,1264,1268
Port        Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Te1/1/4     1,8,12,16,20-24,32,36,40,44,48,56,64,68,72,76,80,88,92,96,201,211,239-242,244-249,260,264,268,1212,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1234,1236,1240,1244,1248,1252,1256,1260,1264,1268
and here is the DLINK Switch:
interface TenGigabitEthernet 5/3
switchport mode trunk
description test
sh int ten 5/3 trunk
Interface                Mode   Native VLAN VLAN lists
TenGigabitEthernet 5/3   On     1           ALL

Do you have the same IP configured on both switches ?
Jon

Sip trunk between CUCM7.0 and third party VOIP provider

Hi all,
I'm looking for a solution/howto configuration for setting up a SIP trunk between CUCM7.0 and a SIP-VoIP provider.
Got SIP username, password and SIP-proxy IP from the provider.
I've done such a setup on CUCME a couple of times, but never on the CUCM.
Who can put me on right way?
Can it be done on the CUCM, or must an IOS-Device be used (got a PSTN-GW connected through H323 with CUCM)?
THanks for the hint,
Greets Norbert

Here we go.....
CONFIG (Version=7.1)
=====================
Version 7.1
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express
! Calling nr. incoming
voice translation-rule 40
rule 1 /$.*$/ /0\1/
! Discard prefix (calling nr.)
voice translation-rule 190
rule 1 /^0$.*$/ /\1/
rule 2 /^9$.*$/ /\1/
! Mapping, internat to external nr.
voice translation-rule 191
rule 10 /^[1-9].*/ /xxxxEXTERNALxxxx/
! for call-forwarding
rule 15 /^0$.*$/ /\1/
! Mapping external to internal nr.
voice translation-rule 192
rule 2 /^xxxxxEXTERNALxxxx/ /4xx/
voice translation-profile TP_IN_SIP
translate calling 40
translate called 192
voice translation-profile TP_OUT_SIP
translate calling 191
translate called 190
dial-peer voice 2001 voip
corlist outgoing dialCORnoFax
description *** SIP-TRUNK (OUT) ***
translation-profile incoming TP_IN_SIP
translation-profile outgoing TP_OUT_SIP
max-conn 2
destination-pattern 9.T
session protocol sipv2
session target ipv4:2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
session transport udp
! customer external nr. range (one dot at the and -> 0-9)
incoming called-number xxxxxxxx.
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
codec g711alaw
no vad
gateway
timer receive-rtp 1200
sip-ua
keepalive target ipv4:2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
authentication username xxEXTERNAL NR.xxxxx password 7 111111111111111111111
calling-info pstn-to-sip from number set xxEXTERNAL NR.xxxxx
retry invite 2
retry response 2
retry bye 2
retry register 2
retry options 1
registrar ipv4:2xx.xxx.xxx.xxx expires 60
host-registrar
Greets,
Norbert
Hope this help......Please rate if helpful

Uplink between Stacked Dell 8132 and Cisco 1921 HSRP pair.

Hello,
I have three Dell 8132 switches stacked and we plan on connecting them to an HSRP pair of Cisco 1921 routers. What would be the best way to uplink these stacked switches to the 1921 pair?
I was thinking of creating vlan trunk from 2 of the 3 Dell switches, one trunk going to each router and enable HSRP on these trunks for the vlans I need to route. Would that be a good approach?
Attached is a basic network of what it would look like. Please suggest if this is a good way to accomplish this or if there is a more better and efficient way to do it?
Thanks

Just to clarify I wasn't suggesting that you move all the routing to the Dell switches. If the routers are already doing some routing for you then you could simply connect the Dell switches with L3 uplinks.
But yes if you feel more comfortable using Cisco then use the routers.
I have never used an integrated switch module to be honest, I just used L3 switches and routers separately.
I suspect it would work as long as there was a backplane connection between the switch module and the router itself so you could route directly from the switch module to the router.
Can't say for sure whether there is or not as like I say I have never used them.
Which to use really comes down to how much bandwidth you need between vlans which only you know really. If you think using one interface and splitting it up may cause problems then you could look at a switch module.
Although it does seem a bit redundant purchasing a switch module when you have L3 switches already :-)
But I do understand what you mean about being a Cisco shop.
Jon

Trunking between a Cisco 3548 and a Liksys SRW208p

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for