Two ISP's for dmz & inside

I have two internet ISP's links, currently dmz and inside interfaces are using one ISP (route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 “ISP1_IP”), I need to use one ISP for inside and the other ISP for dmz.
appreciate your help.
Ali

Hi,
I am assuming ISP1 for Internal zone and ISP2 for DMZ.
Internal zone is allowed to access all protocols
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip Internal-IP 255.255.255.0 any
Allow access from internet to DMZ server
access-list outside1_access_in extended permit tcp any host DMZ-Server'sPulic IP
Pat on the outside and DMZ interface for internal hosts
global (outside) 1 interface
global (dmz) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 internal-IP netmask
Static NAT mapping for our DMZ server
static (dmz,outside1) DMZ-Server'sGlobal-IP   DMZ-Server's-PrivateIP netmask 255.255.255.255
access-group outside1_access_in in interface outside1
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
Default Routes
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ISP1-Gateway 1
route outside1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 ISP2-Gateway 2
hera, outside = ASA port that is connected to ISP1
         outside1=ASA port that is connected to ISP2

Similar Messages

Two ISP connection and 4 NIC

I have two ISP connections for Internet and the BM server has four
interfaces, two public interfaces with completely different IP addresses
and two private interfaces.
I want to connect two different Terminal Server one for each ISP
connection.
When I connect to the public side of the server, I can only connect
to the public IP address that is in the same subnet as the default route
uses.
Thank you

In article <HwTIi.1699$[email protected]>, Valentin wrote:
> When I connect to the public side of the server, I can only connect
> to the public IP address that is in the same subnet as the default route
> uses.
>
That is correct.
This one gets tricky, because of routing issues. If you know NAT, you
might be able to enable dynamic NAT on the private (LAN side) of one of the
internet routers. That will make all traffic coming in that way look like
it comes from a local address, and the second NIC will respond to it.
Otherwise, all traffic will end up going to the default route. You may
need filter exceptions to allow such traffic to go between public NIC's, if
it works at all.
If you just want to RCONJ to the second public NIC, you might be able to
configure static NAT of that address to itself, but the default route and
filters are still going to give you grief.
You might want to look at tip #51 at the URL below, for a system with 2
subnets on one public NIC.
It sounds to me like you need a dual-WAN router to handle the two ISP
connections. I've set up a number of servers that way using inexpensive
Xincom routers (www.xincom.com).
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

Question for the experts... Two ISP's, one home network

OK, I am about to give up on the EA2700... It has been a small nightmare that has cost me time and money.
A bit of background here... We live way off grid, so far that being wired to it is not going to happen in my lifetime. We generate our own power from our own small hydro-electric plant on our creek. We have two internet connections, (three if you include tethering to the phones) and have been manually switching between to two. They are Hughesnet satellite and a line-of-sight ISP.
Here is my question: What is the best router out there for joining the two ISP's?
We had a network guy up to our place last year and he used the "netsh" command in DOS on each computer in the network. It worked for a while but I have a feeling this may have been a contributing factor in the current troubles we're having with the EA2700. We have removed two of the older PC's that had these command lines and have added a new laptop and tower, both of which we attempted to replicate the netsh command on but without success... Yes, a noob at this stuff...
I'm in the city today and am wanting to purchase the right unit before I head back into the hinterland. Thanks!

If you are planning to join two ISP's, you need a dual WAN router. EA2700 can't handle that. You might want to check this RV042 from Cisco.
If everyone needs to believe in something, I believe I'll have another beer..

How to configure for two ISPs?

I have two ISPs, both on dialup. On my previous computer I had both showing in Internet Connect so it was simple to choose. Setting up the new one, I have set up two "Locations" but now I only see one at a time in Internet Connect. To change I have to use System Prefs to select the other at which point it will show up in Internet Connect.
Is there any information on how to set this up properly so that both ISPs appear in Internet Connect?
Pete

I can't give any information about setting it up in Internet Connect (it is no longer on 10.5, but I see you have 10.4), but with the two locations a far simpler (and faster) way to switch is to use the Location menu item in the Apple menu (top left of your screen).
I have my computer set up with four locations and switch as needed without ever touching the preferences panels.
With two locations Internet connect would only display the one relevant to the location you are using at any particular time.

NAT and Routed Network with Two ISP's on one router

I'm sure this has been done covered many times, but I am not finding it.
I have two ISP connections.
With ISP-A I have a /30 between us and 200.100.100.0/24 is routed to me via the /30 for thsi example we will say the /30 is 1.1.1.1 on isp end and 1.1.1.2 on my end
With ISP-B I have a 100.0.0.0/29 subnet. and the ISP gateway is on that subnet at 100.0.0.1
On the inside of my network I have devices using both 200.100.100.x addresses and devices on 192.168.100.x that need to use NAT.
I would like all of the devices on 200.100.100.x addresses to continue using ISP-A as their gateway.
Everything on 192.168.100.x should use NAT and go out ISP-B
I have tried
ip nat inside source route-map ISP-A interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
route-map ISP-B permit 10
match ip address 101
match interface GigabitEthernet0/1
set ip next-hop 100.0.0.1
route-map ISP-A permit 10
match ip address 111
match interface Multilink1
set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1
The problem comes when I have default routes to ISP-A in the router than none of the ISP-B traffic works, and vice versa.

I think for this to work correctly and be able to split traffic between the 2 ISPs, you would need to use BGP, because default is going to use one ISP or the other.
If you can use BGP, this link will help you in load shearing between multiple ISPs when you have one router.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#conf4
HTH

Two Asa Two Isp and Windows 2008 R2 Server

Hello Everybody ,
If you can support my issue , I do appreciate a lot.
First of all thanks a lot for your interest ..
Here is my issue :
I have two Isp Connection ( 1 metro Eth Connection and 1 Ghdsl Connection )
1) Asa 5505 (Version 8.0(5)) is for the 1.st Isp Connection
Windows 2008 R2 server is up and running as Web Server on this ASA 5505 config.
As:
(static (inside,outside) mywebsrv.mycompany.com 192.168.5.5 netmask 255.255.255.255
And Ipconfig of W2008Srv is 192.168.5.5 255.255.255.0 192.168.5.1 (Gateway ASA 5505)
2) Asa 5510 (Version 8.0(5)) is for the 2.nd Isp Connection
Windows 2003 R2 server is up and running as Ftp Server on this ASA 5510 config.
As:
(static (inside,outside) myftpsrv.mycompany.com 192.168.50.10 netmask 255.255.255.255
And Ipconfig of W2003Srv is 192.168.50.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.50.1 (Gateway ASA 5510)
Here is my question :
I need to move my Ftp server (due to old hardware + old server issues )
into the Windows 2008 R2 Server ( HP DL Server with 4 Nic).
If I conect my Asa 5510 to the second nic of Windows 2008 R2 Server.
and give an ip address as 192.168.50.10 255.255.255.0
what should be the gateway Ip address : ?
Before I go ahead and implement :
a) What do I need to do on the Windows 2008 R2 Server
as persistent route adds with different metrics
b) Any config adds or changes on Asa 5505 and ASA 5510 regarding static routes with
different metric and so on ...
Many thanks in advance for your support .

If you do that, the second interface will work as a failsafe for the first NIC.
As far as i know, you won't be able to route traffic based on the type of traffic nor do load-balancing between the interfaces.
I guess the best approach will be to get a newer server and use it as a replacement for the one running 2003 R2.

I have problem with a dynamic failover with two isps

Hello, I would like to help me with something.
I would like to do failover on my cisco router but the problem is that i have two isp but one of them is DSL. I meam that It learns gateway for dhcp and this is my main gateway.
I tried to do the same thing but I can´t put track in this command "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp.."
I also use "ip dhcp-client default-route 25" but It didn´t work..
could you help me ? please
I upload a file with configuration that i actually have it. In this file I don´t have any configuration about failover because i tried many option but i haven´t found any solution

I did this but on router didn´t change deafult route.
This is the configuration that i tried:
Current configuration : 9940 bytes
! Last configuration change at 22:10:41 UTC Fri Aug 29 2014 by Conssa
version 15.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname RT_Conssaccs
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c890-universalk9-mz.153-3.M2.bin
boot-end-marker
aqm-register-fnf
logging buffered 51200 warnings
enable secret 5 $1$RK//$OFh6Dnk96LlX1VFKQwsme.
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default enable
aaa authentication login consola local
aaa authentication login vty line
aaa authentication login userauthen local
aaa authorization network EZAUTHR local
aaa session-id common
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4275920401
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-4275920401
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4275920401
ip dhcp ping timeout 100
ip dhcp update dns
ip dhcp-client default-router distance 100
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO891-K9 sn FTX145104B5
object-group network conssaremoto
description vpnremoto
range
object-group network pruebasael
description vpnremoto
range
redundancy
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
no ip ftp passive
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 5
lifetime 180
crypto isakmp policy 20
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto isakmp key cisco address
crypto isakmp keepalive 10 4
crypto isakmp client configuration group conssa
key vpnbna
pool conssaVPN
acl 121
mode transport
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
set pfs group5
crypto ipsec profile EZPROFILE
set transform-set TSET
interface Tunnel0
description VPNConssaCCs
bandwidth 1000
ip address
ip mask-reply
ip mtu
ip nhrp authentication DMVPN_NW
ip nhrp map multicast
ip nhrp map
ip nhrp network-id 100000
ip nhrp holdtime 360
ip nhrp nhs
ip nhrp registration no-unique
ip nhrp registration timeout 30
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
delay 1000
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0
tunnel destination
tunnel key 100000
tunnel protection ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
interface FastEthernet2
switchport access vlan 2
no ip address
shutdown
interface FastEthernet3
no ip address
interface FastEthernet4
no ip address
interface FastEthernet5
no ip address
interface FastEthernet6
no ip address
interface FastEthernet7
no ip address
interface FastEthernet8
description $ETH-WAN$
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip unnumbered Vlan1
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec profile EZPROFILE
interface GigabitEthernet0
description $ETH-WAN$
ip dhcp client route track 1
ip ddns update hostname
ip ddns update noip
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
interface Vlan2
no ip address
shutdown
interface Async1
no ip address
encapsulation slip
ip local policy route-map prueba
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http client username conssa
ip nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.6.1 200
ip sla auto discovery
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 8.8.8.8 source-interface GigabitEthernet0
frequency 5
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
no logging trap
no cdp run
route-map prueba permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop dynamic dhcp
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 101 permit icmp any host 8.8.8.8 echo
sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 200.84.32.1 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [100/0] via 200.84.32.1
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks

Two-page spread for non-Apple printed book

This is probably going to sound complicated:
I'm in a small program, and we want to create a yearbook, which we decided to do ourselves since there's so few of us. The book will have pages of events and groups, of course, but also "profile pages" where photos focused on a single person are included.
Two of the people in the program are married to each other. Naturally, I want their pages to be side-by-side. More than that, though, I want to have a picture right in the middle of their two pages that I got from their wedding. In the picture, they have their arms linked, so the idea is that the gutter of the book will separate the photo with the man on the left (and his "profile page" will then go on the left), and the woman on the right (with her profile page).
I hope that makes sense so far.
The question is, how do I ensure I lose as little as possible in the gutter if I'm printing with a service other than Apple? Apple's just a bit too expensive for over a dozen books, so I'm looking at mostly Inkubook or Viovio. I've already set up a custom book in Aperture with the page sizes set to 8.7" x 11.2" (to account for 0.1" trim) and an inside margin of 0.25" (for the gutter).
Viovio has a suggestion on their website that images overlapping two pages should have a portion duplicated on either page, with the size of that duplication being equal to the size of the gutter (so the right image duplicates 0.25" of the photo on the left and the left duplicates 0.25" of the photo on the right).
Does that sound like it will work? And then, should I have the same photo on both pages with a duplicated area of 0.5" (the two gutters) or 0.7" (gutters plus trims)? To that end, how do you even measure distances in Aperture - I don't seem to be able to find a ruler of any kind, which makes putting equal spaces between photos and borders on pages very hard as well.
If that doesn't make sense, which I know it may not, let me know and I'll try to clear it up...

Two page spreads are tricky and will depend on how the binding is done by the third party printer. If you look closely at the PDF file created by Aperture for books, you'll notice that the individual pages of a two page spread do not absolutely bisect the image you've aligned across the two pages. Rather, the inside binding-side edges will give you a little extra bleed, so that in binding with the book pages spread open, you'll see one continuous image without white space.
I can't say for certain because I've not used a printer other than Apple, but I would imagine that there is variance from printer to printer w/respect to this center margin.
Of course, I could be entirely wrong.

Using the OSPF default-information originate command with two ISPs

I am working for a company that has two Internet circuits with different ISPs at two different locations for redundancy, and both Internet circuits run at different speeds. I'd like to be able to direct the majority (but not all) of the traffic through the ISP with the larger bandwith, but then failover all traffic to one ISP when the other goes down. We're currently using the "default-information originate" command, which fails over OK, but I haven't figured out how to do the load balancing. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thank you.

One thing that you could consider is advertising the default route as and
external 1 route instead of an external 2 route(cisco default). If you advertise it as an E1
route, all routers will take into consideration the cost associated with the
default route to the router advertising the default route plus the cost of the
default route itself. Whereas if it is an E2 route, the routers just use the
cost associated with the external cost and not the path to get to the router
advertising the default route.
If you made the default route E1, then the routers closest to the advertised
routers will prefer the closest default route and their preference could then be
tweaked by adjusting the interface costs for the default route with a routemap.
By using this method, you could then control which routers use which internet
connection on a per router basis because you could control the cost the internal router
sees for the path from the internal router to the ASBR advertising the default route. The
path with the lowest cost will be prefered.
router ospf 1
default-information originate metric-type 1

GLBP and Two ISP's

Hello all, has any one used GLBP with two ISP's. I have been looking for an good example, I have not found one yet. If any one has dealt with this? I have not used GLBP before so just putting out the feelers.
Basically I have a remote site connected to two ISP's it's a MPLS WAN for both ISP's.
Remote sites have two routers one for each ISP connection.
Two data centers, each with a connection to both ISP's
The remote LAN side is a flat segment with no layer 3 switch (I know).
Let's say we are running eBGP with private AS numbers each ISP has a different one.

check out the following link for configuring GLBP, hope this helps :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008042fb97.html

Two ISP´s, can they work together ?

Hi people,
Thing is, I have two ISP´s in my LAN with diferent routers (two diferent gateways), then , I need to use the second one only like a backup, I typed a secondary ip route with a diferent weitgh in another internal router which is my default gateway but, it does not work fine.
I was trying with route-maps but I did not find how to apply them in that case.
If somebody can help me about that issue
will be very useful.
Any link, any idea please
Thanks in advanced
Martin

Yes you can do that.
You can use HSRP for this and then you don't need to put floating static route.
hope this help

Two Ethernet-Two ISPs Possible?

Hello!
Please, once and for all, enlighten me. I cannot seem to find a clear answer.
I have two ISPs with ethernet connection. I wish to use/switch between them.
Is this even possible?
Is there a way to switch between them internally (no cable pulling)?
Thanks!

To disable an interface:
In Network system preference (click the padlock at lower-left to unlock if needed) select the desired interface in the left column, click the gear icon at the bottom, select "Make Service Inactive), then click Apply (lower-right).
Instead of manually switching them on and off, you can leave them both on and use "Set Service Order" with the gear icon. It will then use the first interface. If that stops, it should then use the next one.

Two payroll run for employee in same month

Hello Experts,
Iam having one issue.Client requirement is,if a employee get transferred to other location in mid of the month,in that case his payroll should run say 15 days for previous location & 15 days for new location.Client says since ESI will be location wise so ,two payroll calcultion for a single month & cumulated result will be amount paid to Employee.Also when transferred employee should get new ESI esi code location wise but PF code will be same.
is that possible in system?
Please suggest some inputs.
Thanks in advance

Thanks sadhar,
It means that...nothing new config to be done..it will happen automatically.Please explain a bit.
Regards

I didn't setup a two step verification for my apple Id , and then when i login into my account on the browser it prompt to enter my verification code !!! HOW COME

i didn't setup a two step verification for my apple Id , and then when i login into my account on the browser it prompt to enter my verification code !!! HOW COME
please help because all my data are stored in the cloud

- See if it is listed here for downloading. If it is then redownload it..
Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
- If not there then contact iTunes.
Contact iTunes

Two payment doc. for same Vendor in F110

Dear All,
In F110,the system is creating two payment documents for the same vendor with same payment method.
we have 3 open item(document) for this particular vendor,but the system is posting two payment document.
we have checked the Vendor master and FBZP payment method settings(Single payment is not selected in both),but how the system is posting two payment document for the 3 open invoice.
Do suggest.
Regards.

Check the following fields in all the 3 invoices
They must be identical for 2 of them and different for 1
Paying company code
Sending company code
Account Number of Vendor or Creditor
Customer Number 1
Payee code
Currency Key
Payment Method
Short Key for a House Bank
ID for account details
Partner Bank Type
Business Area
Business Place
Indicator: Capital Goods Affected?
Grouping Field for Automatic Payments
Payment Method Supplement
Instruction key 1
Instruction key 2
Instruction key 3
Regards
Sach!n

Two ISP's for dmz & inside

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for