Ugly fonts in GTK apps on e17

Hello, I would want to know how I can change the fonts of GTK apps in e17, cause it looks really ugly compared with gnome...
This is my gnome desktop:
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4176/pantallazomp4.png
And this my e17 desktop:
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/8717/2 … 400rm8.png
What can I do?
Greetings

Davigetto wrote:
Hello, I would want to know how I can change the fonts of GTK apps in e17, cause it looks really ugly compared with gnome...
This is my gnome desktop:
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/4176/pantallazomp4.png
And this my e17 desktop:
http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/8717/2 … 400rm8.png
What can I do?
Greetings
can i be honest?!
imo the fonts in e17 are looking better than on the gnome-shot!
the fonts in gnome are blurred and letters like the "m" look like i'm squinting.
this is my /etc/fonts/local.conf:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
<!-- Info at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Xorg_and_Fonts -->
<!-- Replace Courier with a better-looking font -->
<match target="pattern" name="family">
<test name="family" qual="any">
<string>Courier</string>
</test>
<edit name="family" mode="assign">
<!-- Other choices - Courier New, Luxi Mono -->
<string>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</string>
</edit>
</match>
<match target="font">
<edit name="rgba" mode="assign">
<const>rgb</const>
</edit>
<edit name="autohint" mode="assign">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
<edit name="antialias" mode="assign">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
<edit name="hinting" mode="assign">
<bool>true</bool>
</edit>
<edit name="hintstyle" mode="assign">
<const>hintfull</const>
</edit>
</match>
<!-- Disable autohint for bold fonts, otherwise they look *too* bold -->
<match target="font">
<test name="weight" compare="more">
<const>medium</const>
</test>
<edit name="autohint" mode="assign">
<bool>false</bool>
</edit>
</match>
<!-- Reject bitmap fonts in favour of Truetype, Postscript, etc. -->
<selectfont>
<rejectfont>
<pattern>
<patelt name="scalable">
<bool>false</bool>
</patelt>
</pattern>
</rejectfont>
</selectfont>
</fontconfig>
Last edited by iggy (2008-01-11 20:22:03)

Similar Messages

  • [solved]Fontconfig problems (Ugly GTK Apps)

    So I just installed the LCD filter patched packages on my new comp, but I'm trying to determine why some of my GTK apps still look really bad..
    Firefox looks great, but pretty much any other app looks like crap, the fonts are barely readable. Below is my font configuration..
    My .fonts.conf
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <fontconfig>
    <match target="font" >
    <edit mode="assign" name="rgba"><const>rgb</const></edit>
    <edit mode="assign" name="hinting"><bool>true</bool></edit>
    <edit mode="assign" name="hintstyle"><const>hintslight</const></edit>
    <edit mode="assign" name="antialias"><bool>true</bool></edit>
    <edit mode="assign" name="lcdfilter"><const>lcddefault</const></edit>
    </match>
    </fontconfig>
    /etc/fonts/conf.d directory:
    # ls -l /etc/fonts/conf.d
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Mar 3 16:01 10-autohint.conf -> ../conf.avail/10-autohint.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Mar 3 16:01 10-lcd-filter.conf -> ../conf.avail/10-lcd-filter.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 35 Mar 3 16:01 10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf -> ../conf.avail/10-sub-pixel-rgb.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 Mar 3 16:01 29-replace-bitmap-fonts.conf -> ../conf.avail/29-replace-bitmap-fonts.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Mar 3 16:01 45-latin.conf -> ../conf.avail/45-latin.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Mar 3 16:01 49-sansserif.conf -> ../conf.avail/49-sansserif.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Mar 3 16:02 50-user.conf -> ../conf.avail/50-user.conf
    lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Mar 3 16:02 60-latin.conf -> ../conf.avail/60-latin.conf
    I feel like I'm missing one, but I've attempted to link all the configurations from conf.avail and it still doesn't look good. Anyone?
    Edit: Heres a screenshot:
    Last edited by brenix (2010-03-04 04:39:30)

    Hey there.
    When I first installed arch, x11, xmonad, and gtk, the fonts looked like crap on my screen too. I ran over a ~/.Xdefaults setup that included:
    ! Xft settings ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Xft.dpi: 96
    Xft.antialias: true
    Xft.rgba: rgb
    Xft.hinting: true
    Xft.hintstyle: hintslight
    After restarting X, the ugly fonts were gone. I also switched the fonts used in gtk (using lxappearance) to the microsoft cleartype fonts (yeah yeah freedom hater). Don't forget you have to source ~/.Xdefaults from ~/.xinitrc like so:
    # make sure the X Defaults gets loaded
    xrdb ~/.Xdefaults
    Also note, lxappearance is a great app for changing gtk+ themes.

  • [NEARLY SOLVED] font rendering in gtk apps problem after last upgrade

    Im' using KDE, cairo-lcd, libxft-lcd... my fonts looked beautifully, but now they look horrible...
    After last upgrade my gtk apps (firefox, thunderbird) render fonts in an ugly way...
    I've tried to revert to pango 1.16.5 with no lucky result (the same problem)...
    here is the log:
    [2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded bind (9.4.1_P1-2 -> 9.4.1_P1-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded glib2 (2.14.0-2 -> 2.14.0-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:56] upgraded gnupg2 (2.0.5-1 -> 2.0.6-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded gtk2 (2.10.14-2 -> 2.10.14-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded kernel26ck (2.6.22.2.ck1-1 -> 2.6.22.3.ck1-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libdownload (1.1-1 -> 1.1-2)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libevent (1.3b-1 -> 1.3d-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded libxtst (1.0.2-1 -> 1.0.3-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded nvidia-ck (100.14.11-2 -> 100.14.11-3)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded sip (4.6-1 -> 4.7-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded pyqt (3.17.2-1 -> 3.17.3-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xf86-input-joystick (1.2.2-1 -> 1.2.3-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-server-utils (1.0.4-1 -> 1.0.4-2)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-utils (1.0.2-2 -> 1.0.2-4)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xorg-xdm (1.1.5-1 -> 1.1.6-1)
    [2007-08-19 14:57] upgraded xterm (225-1 -> 229-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded cpio (2.8-1 -> 2.9-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded ed (0.5-3 -> 0.8-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded initscripts (2007.08-1 -> 2007.08-2)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded intltool (0.36.0-1 -> 0.36.1-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded libarchive (2.2.5-1 -> 2.2.6-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded man-pages (2.60-1 -> 2.64-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded pciutils (2.2.4-2 -> 2.2.6-1)
    [2007-08-21 00:16] upgraded readline (5.2-2 -> 5.2-3)
    [2007-08-22 00:16] upgraded gdbm (1.8.3-3 -> 1.8.3-4)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.3-1 -> 2.6.22.4-2)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded lcms (1.16-1 -> 1.17-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded libice (1.0.2-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded libxrender (0.9.2-1 -> 0.9.3-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded procinfo (18-3 -> 19-1)
    [2007-08-22 00:17] upgraded xorg-apps (1.0.2-4 -> 1.0.3-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.4-2 -> 2.6.22.4-2.1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded librsvg (2.18.0-1 -> 2.18.1-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded libxpm (3.5.6-1 -> 3.5.7-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded libxaw (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded makedev (3.8.3-1 -> 3.23-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded mcpp (2.6-1 -> 2.6.4-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded naim (0.11.8.2.1-1 -> 0.11.8.3.1-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded nfs-utils (1.0.12-2 -> 1.0.12-3)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded pam (0.81-4 -> 0.99.8.1-3.1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded pango (1.16.5-1 -> 1.18.0-1)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded sox (13.0.0-1 -> 13.0.0-2)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded xorg-apps (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.3-2)
    [2007-08-22 23:49] upgraded xtrans (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded glibc (2.6.1-1 -> 2.6.1-2)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded bftpd (1.9-1 -> 2.0-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded gcc (4.2.1-3 -> 4.2.1-3.1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded gtk-doc (1.8-2 -> 1.8-3)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded hal-info (0.20070618-1 -> 0.20070725-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded perl-xml-simple (2.16-2 -> 2.18-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:25] upgraded icon-naming-utils (0.8.2-2 -> 0.8.5-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:26] upgraded kernel26 (2.6.22.4-2.1 -> 2.6.22.5-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:27] upgraded kernel26ck (2.6.22.3.ck1-1 -> 2.6.22.5.ck1-1)
    [2007-08-25 15:27] upgraded libgnomeprint (2.18.0-1 -> 2.18.1-1)
    [2007-08-25 22:41] removed libgnomeprintui (2.18.0-1)
    [2007-08-25 22:41] removed libgnomeprint (2.18.1-1)
    i dunno what happened...
    plz, someone help me
    regards
    Last edited by saneone (2007-08-30 18:11:32)

    Bogart wrote:
    I think the spacing now is correct, while before it was wrong. The only "problem" is that you got used to a bad font rendering, and now that it has changed for better you feel like it's different and don't like it.
    Really, *most* of the problems that people find in Linux's fonts are just because they are used to the awful default fonts from Windows XP. Yes, people can even get used to those fonts and believe they're good!!! And when they see correct fonts in Linux they think they're bad...
    What I would do is remove the MS TTF fonts. They work bad in Windows and worse in Linux. You should use Bitstream Vera or DejaVu if you want good quality fonts (especially in web pages).
    But, then again, you might think that they look wrong just because you're not used to it... Oh, well...
    What does correct font / correct spacing mean ?
    IMO, that doesn't make any sense, because that's a totally subjective matter, like many other things in this world.
    BTW, I love how fonts look in Windows, and I think that must be the only thing MS got right. Thus, I'm using ms fonts in linux, and a rendering as close as possible (no autohinting or antialiasing or subpixel rendering).
    Similarly, I could find a woman beautiful that you would find ugly or just average. We are all different, and it's better that way

  • Gnome splash screen and gtk-apps in awesome huge fonts.

    Hi all,
    I installed awesome wm the other day and for some reason all GTK-apps have huge fonts. GDM and the gnome splash screen have the same issue. I'm thinking this is a DPI issue but I wouldn't know where to start looking. Could someone point me in the right direction?
    Thanks.

    Master One wrote:
    In the meantime I swapped over to KDEMOD again, but I am still not satisfied. I prefer a mix of QT and GTK+ applications, and whatever I tried, they just do not look the same if running them in KDE or XFCE4.
    Maybe I should try running a WM instead of a DE, after some reading I am very tempted to go for Openbox.
    Can somebody running just a WM comment on the results, when mixing QT & GTK+ apps?
    I use Openbox and don't have any ugly looking apps. Granted, I think the only QT app I use is opera though

  • Font corruption in GTK apps only

    For a day or so now I have been seeing quite bad font corruption in GTK apps -- gtk-demo and Chromium both have this problem. QT apps are not affected. Forcing a font cache rebuild with `sudo fc-cache -rf` did not help the situation, and neither did reinstalling the affected fonts.
    I did not upgrade or install any packages between the font rendering being fine, and it being corrupted (see the screenshot).
    Screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/pF39tvm.png
    Any ideas?
    Last edited by cdown (2014-03-15 00:39:40)

    I've seen corruption like this with a lot of cairo apps because the text to be rendered is sent to a buggy EXA driver. Does text look better if you turn off EXA acceleration?

  • Weird font issues transitioning from KDE to GTK apps

    I'm having some strange issues happening between programs. Firefox and Pidgin, two GTK apps, can render kanji symbols fine. However, if I attempt the same in Konqueror or Konsole, they render as boxes.
    Clearly I have the right fonts. What do I do to make Konqueror read them properly?

    Justin, Try the following:
    1) Quit all open applications.
    2) If you have 'Helvetica Fractions', 'Times Phonetic' or 'Rougue Stencil-Type' fonts installed, delete them.
    3) Delete your fonts caches with *Font Finagler*, FontNuke or OnyX +(or with whatever utility you normally use)+
    *Font Finagler <http://homepage.mac.com/mdouma46/fontfinagler/> (this is the BEST utility)*
    FontNuke <http://www.jamapi.com/pr/fn/>
    OnyX <http://www.titanium.free.fr/pgs/english.html>
    4) Restart your Mac
    5) Open your Font Book->Edit menu 'Select All' fonts - from the File menu select 'Validate Fonts'
    from the Edit menu select 'Resolve Duplicates'
    Good luck,
    Tom

  • [SOLVED] Ugly fonts in KDE plamoids

    I'm running KDE 4.8 on my Arch 64 box and I've had for a while now ugly fonts in all the plasma widgets I'm running. All the other fonts look nice and smooth in all other places, eg. GTK and QT apps etc. but plasma widget fonts aren't as smooth for some reason. I'm using the infinality patches with the "UBUNTU" setting currently. Any heads up on would be nice...
    Many Thanks
    Last edited by fettouhi (2012-02-22 17:37:04)

    kokoko3k wrote:QT_GRAPHICSSYSTEM=native may help, add it to /etc/environment for a system wide setting
    or edit the exec line /usr/share/autostart/plasma-desktop.desktop by adding --graphicssystem native
    Dont use the first advice, because you will lose the advantages of raster system system wide. Raster system is faster than native, so apps are snappier with it. The second method is better
    Last edited by syms (2012-01-30 18:12:21)

  • GTK apps in Qt Environment -- Does it really make a difference?

    Whenever I read around about running GTK apps in KDE, I get a lot of horror stories about how needing to load GTK libraries in the Qt environment will degrade my system performance and bog down my desktop experience. After spending a lot of time in two pretty popular GTK apps (Firefox & Gimp), and monitoring my desktop performance, I've certainly not found anything noticable (other than that they look ugly as sin). Furthermore, I keep a system monitoring widget on my desktop, and it doesn't seem to make a lick of difference on my system resources. Are all the warnings about running GTK in Qt simply horror stories? Has anyone actually noticed a difference from running GTK apps in Qt (or the other way around for that matter)?

    axel668 wrote:no, I've always used GTK apps in KDE (Firefox, Thunderbird, LibreOffice, ...) and never had problems. And there's a great article in the wiki about theming: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Un … plications
    That's a great little wiki page which I just visited, used, and now love. Thank you for sharing!

  • Problems with ligatures in firefox, gtk-apps

    I have trouble with ligatures such as fl and fi in firefox and some different gtk-apps(pidgin for example). The problem is that the ligatures are rendered at a slightly different size and weight for some fonts.
    I use libxft-lcd and freetype2-lcd. I don't really care for ligatures for on screen display, just a way to disable them altogether would work just fine.

    I believe multicast means you are sending with a 255 address, like 198.162.10.255. Most routers will block multicasts, probably because multicasts cause a lot of traffic. (And of course multicasts will not work over the internet.)
    UDP can send multicast or to a specific IP.
    There is no problem with using more than one port.
    If you listen on a UDP port then you get everything that fits in the buffer. So as long as packets aren't being dropped then you are getting everything.

  • Can't use bitmap font in GUI apps

    I like the look of bitmap fonts and I used to be able to use them in GUI apps such as GTK apps.
    For the last few months whenever I try to start GUI app with a bitmap font selected the application crashes. Always with the same error message about cairo-scaled-font.
    For example, here is my terminal output when I try to start dwb using the bitmap font Lemon as my default font:
    dwb: cairo-scaled-font.c:459: _cairo_scaled_glyph_page_destroy: Assertion '!scaled_font->cache_frozen' failed.
    This problem is not limited to just dwb but any GUI app when I try to use any bitmap font.
    I've tried googling the problem and the only advice I could find was to run fc-cache -fv, which didn't fix the issue.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    I normally use BSPWM as my window manager, and I have just discovered that If I try to start dwb in Gnome it actually works!
    This isn't really a solution for me because I spend most of my time in BSPWM, but it's interesting.

  • [Tut] Smooth KDE4 + FF3 (and other GTK apps) integration (Oxygen!)

    This is a very simple tutorial, but this problem stumped me for a little (finding gtk-kde4-oxygen-theme), so I thought it might help others. Most normal KDE4 +GTK guides tell you to use  gtk-qt-engine by itself, which some stubborn apps (Firefox especially) don't play nice with. Most Firefox guides tell you to install QtCurve, which is nice, but not nearly as nice as Oxygen IMO, especially since even KDE apps will change to QtCurve.
    I used KDEmod, but normal KDE should work too.
    1.) Get the KFirefox theme here: http://ramonantonio.net/kde-firefox/ This will change the main look of Firefox. to integrate well.
    2.) Get gtk-qt-engine, and install. This will let you set a KDE style for GTK apps. Unfortunately, "Use my KDE style in GTK applications" does not work in some stubborn apps, like Firefox, and you're normally forced to "Use another style" that's not as nice as your main KDE4.
    3.) Get gtk-kde4-oxygen-theme from the AUR, and install. This is one of those "other styles", but it's very Oxygen-like.
    4.) Go to the KDE System Settings, Appearance, and GTK Styles and Fonts. Select "Use another style", and then 'kde4-oxygen'.
    Done! You may need to restart Firefox and/or KDE. Enjoy =]

    brainsqueezer wrote:
    MillTek wrote:I tried and it changed he size of the FFox 'personal toolbar' to half the screen in height.  I refer to the toolbar where you can drag'n'drop links and establish folders of links etc.  Any ideas???
    Hello I'm the creator of the theme. Could you provide more information and test latest version?
    Sure.  I am using Minefield 3.0 and I just loaded your theme and it seems to work fine. Looks like you got whatever was causing the problem to work properly.

  • Weird menus in gnome/gtk apps with xinerama

    Hi,
    since I upgraded to gnome 2.30.0 a couple of days ago some applications pop up their menus in the wrong place.
    No matter on which of my monitors the app is running, the menu pops up on the primary one.
    I observed this behavior in nautilus, pidgin, gimp, gvim and gtk-demo, but for example firefox and thunderbird are not affected (I assume these are gtk apps, they look like they are).
    For the records, I'm not running a gnome session, I use gdm to start e17.
    Is anybody else experiencing this?
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks,
    Christoph

    resi wrote:
    Hi,
    since I upgraded to gnome 2.30.0 a couple of days ago some applications pop up their menus in the wrong place.
    No matter on which of my monitors the app is running, the menu pops up on the primary one.
    I observed this behavior in nautilus, pidgin, gimp, gvim and gtk-demo, but for example firefox and thunderbird are not affected (I assume these are gtk apps, they look like they are).
    For the records, I'm not running a gnome session, I use gdm to start e17.
    Is anybody else experiencing this?
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks,
    Christoph
    im replying to this to leave it as a reminder of reporting back when i get to my dualscreen setup.
    but things to have in mind.
    - i use compiz to place windows in a 'smart' way
    - i got gnome session

  • [Solved] ugly theme in some apps

    Hi
    I have install arch along with kde. In some apps like firefox, trnasmission etc. the application interface is ugly so I installed oxygen-gtk2 and oxygen-gtk3 but none of them are appearing in system-setting. I haven't use gnome much but I think this ugly appearence of some apps is due to missing gtk style. Am I right? How can I fix it?
    Regards
    Last edited by zetrotrack000 (2014-03-11 09:15:56)

    Firefox is a GTK2 application and Transmission is a GTK3 application. Themes for both toolkits can easily changed by editing the configuration files for GTK2 and GTK3. (See here)
    Also, see here for more information on configuring Oxygen in KDE.
    Lastly, isn't there a checkbox in "System Settings" (a KDE application) that says something like "Manange themes for other toolkits"? Do you have that enabled?

  • Connection lost and slow gtk apps

    Hi,
    I have a wireless connection (zd1211 chip). I am always connected to the router, but when it losts internet connection (telecom italia sucks), gtk apps (not qt) freeze for about 20 seconds before they start.(seems like a connection timed out) I had ubuntu before and I hadn't this problem...
    Suggestion?

    Cornholio wrote:Hi,
    I have a wireless connection (zd1211 chip). I am always connected to the router, but when it losts internet connection (telecom italia sucks), gtk apps (not qt) freeze for about 20 seconds before they start.(seems like a connection timed out) I had ubuntu before and I hadn't this problem...
    Suggestion?
    *Which* GTK apps?  I suspect not all of them.  Do you have mounted filesystems on NFS or something similar?
    -- Thomas Adam

  • Can't start GTK apps on Kdemod

    Hi,
    I'm very new to Arch, but I've managed to install some things I need so far. I did a FTP install and then installed x and kdemod, fixed screen resolution, installed nvidia driver, configured alsa. I think I want to stay on Arch, I really like it's speed and the package manager pacman.
    Anyway I can't start GTK apps, currently I've Firefox, Seamonkey and Gparted installed but when I click on their shortcuts in K menu nothing happens, when I try to start in terminal I get
    gparted
    No protocol specified
    (gparted:7468): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
    I have gtk2,glib2,gtkmm and kdemod-gtk-qt-engine installed.

    lo enabled?
    Don't know how to check.
    hostname in /etc/hosts?
    # /etc/hosts: static lookup table for host names
    #<ip-address> <hostname.domain.org> <hostname>
    127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
    # End of file
    Last edited by Boreas (2007-11-02 05:55:59)

Maybe you are looking for