Unplanned cost to be captured while doing at MIRO

Hi Friends,
As per our current OBYC setting, unplanned cost is going to another Miscellaneous account, Is there a way to capture unplanned cost in the material G/L account ?
Ilyas

HI,
There may be different options available in SAP of unplanned Cost:-
1. Put that it in Unplanned Cost while MIRO then system will post either to separate GL or Stock Acct as per the setting in SPRO.
IMG - >MM - >Invoice Verification - >incoming invoice - >Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
2. After Posting the MIRO, Put that cost in Subsiquent Debit for that Delivery note or PO Number. and it will be updated in PO history also and good for reporting
system will distribute in stock material acct as per available stock and rest in PRD acct.
3. You can post that cost in Separate GL after doing Setting in SPRO, GL Tab will appear in MIRO screen and post that cost there for e.g. GL for unplanned Cost.
SPRO> Material Management>Logistics Invoice Verification->Incoming Invoice->Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Account
Hope Help U !
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Similar Messages

Vendor barcode to be captured while doing GR

Hi,
My client is receiving spare parts from vendor which is having vendor bar code. User wants to identify and check the material by scanning their bar code while doing Goods receipt in MIGO.
Client dont want to create their own bar code.
Is it possible to scan vendor bar code to identify the material? If possible, can you help me out how it can be done?
Thanks in advance,
Babu

Hi
checkput this links provided in the first thread of the MM forum
[An Introduction to RFID |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3587]
[RFID Scenario Installation-Configuration |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2133]
[Concept of RFID & Usage with Mobile Infrastructure - |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2022]
[RFID Scenario Installation-Preparation - |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2103]
[RFID Scenario Installation-Installation - |https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/2110]

While doing MIGO & MIRO for Third Party V/D

Hi Gurus,
While doing MIGO for Third Party Vendor, I am facing the below mentioned error.
Maintain number range object for object J_1IRG23A1, year 2008, excise group V1
Message no. 4F159
Kindly suggest the solution for that.........
After this i'll come to MIRO

Goto J1I9, there put Object "J_1IRG23A1" and click on Number Ranges button, there for Excise Group "V1" maintain No. Range with No. Range Code "01"
Pankaj Singh

Error while doing Txn MIRO

when i post the Invoice thru txn MIRO for the previous financial year i
got the below error
Express Document "Update was Terminated"
when i check it in my inbox i see the following details in SO01
Error Info : M8 185: Invoice document XXXXXXXXX.

Hi,
Unfortunately the error message does not help much.
M8 185 simply states "Invoice document X X could not be created.
You might get more information if you get an ABAP programmer to perform a trace.
Terminated updates are not that easy to solve due to the fact that you get very little info on the problem. But a trace gets more.
Steve B

While doing MIRO i am getting an error: Enter a tax jurisdiction code

Hi,
While doing a MIRO, i am getting an error :
Enter a tax jurisdiction code
Message no. M8757
How to Resolve
Pratik

Hi
Try this
1.To enter the tax amounts of the G/L account items, choose Extras ® Tax amounts. The Tax Amounts screen appears.
You can branch to this screen at any point during document entry.
The Tax Amounts screen shows the tax amount, tax code, posting key, tax base amount, and jurisdiction code for all the items already entered. When you call up this screen after entering the G/L account items, it displays the amounts that have already been entered.
2.You can now choose how you want to enter the taxes.
The tax jurisdiction codes represent the different taxing authorities to which you submit payment for taxes EG: the state, county, city etc.
In SAP you can have as many as 4 levels. Configuration is done in 2 steps :
First step :
The tax jurisdiction structure (structure of the tax code) is set up with following menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > specify structure for tax jurisdiction code.
Alternatively you can use t-code OBCO
This step allows you the enter the character length of your various level of hierarchy within your tax jurisdiction code structure (State 2 char, county 3, city 4, etc...).
Second step:
You configure the tax jurisdiction code using the structure defined earlier, menu path :
IMG >Financial accounting> Fi Accounting basic settings> tax on sales/purchases > basic settings > define tax jurisdiction codes.
Alternatively t-code OBCP
Define your tax jurisdiction codes, EG GA0000000 for Georgia, GA001000 for Georgia, douglas county, GA001001 for georgia, douglas county, city of lithia springs.

Error while doing MIRO-Overflow for arithmetical operation (type P) in prog

Hi ,
I am getting the error while doing the MIRO as below-
Runtime Errors         COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW
Exception              CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW
Date and Time          20.05.2009 10:07:03
Short text
     Overflow during the arithmetical operation (type P) in program "SAPLMRMC".
What happened?
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
     The current ABAP program "SAPLMRMC" had to be terminated because it has
     come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
What can you do?
     Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
     To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
     administrator.
     Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
     at and manage termination messages, and you can also
     keep them for a long time.
Error analysis
     An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
     The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_ARITHMETIC_OVERFLOW', was not
      caught in
     procedure "MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by
      a RAISING clause.
     Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
Please let me know how can this be removed.

Hi,
There can be some problem with tolerances set in the customizing.
In my case, I was getting this error because of delivery date variance. The difference between delivery date maintained in PO and invoice date was huge and hence the multiplication of price of PO and difference of delivery date was huge and that was the reason for error.
Similarly in your case also, there will be some tolerance limit problem.
Please check your tolerance limits set in customizing.
Regards,
Mihir Popat

Region to pick based on branch vendor while doing MIRO

Dear All,
following is the scenario :
PO is created on branch vendor (with a HO vendor mentioned in master). While doing MIRO, the system automatically replaces the branch vendor with the Head office vendor (as mentioned in master). The region taken for tax purpose is the region of the HO vendor.
Now the requirement is that, while doing the MIRO, the system should pick up the region of the branch vendor and not HO vendor. Will have to create/ write an exit or use substitution.
Can somebody eleborate how should the logic be mapped for exit in connection with substitution?
Thanks,
Tapan

Dear Alok,
Thanks for the reply. We actually already started to work on it. But, as we want to replace HO vendor with branch vendor during MIRO as already mentioned, we are still awaiting what logic should be mapped in substitution as well as exit for that.
It would be great help if you can throw some light on the same.
Thanks
Tapan

What is the functionality for while doing MIRO

Helllo sap guru
Please give me idea about while doing in miro .what is the functionanality for SUB SEQUENT DEBIT & SUBSEQUENT CREDIT .
PLEASE ITS VERY URGENT FOR THE ABOVE QUESTION.
THANKS & REGRDS
TEJA

Subsequent Credit:
If vendor charges more in an invoice we can subsequently recover the same through a credit memo in MIRO
Subsequent Debit:
If we need to pay extra we can do through subsequent debit through a debit memo in MIRO.
Revert for queries.
Assign points if useful
Rgds,
Harmees

Alternative Reconcialtion account while doig the MIRO

Hi All,
One of the cleint required alternative Reconcialtion accoutn while doign the MIRO. Scenario like this there is one Vendor 'A' used supplies Raw material and Serives to company. Business is not intrested to create new vendor. But they needs different reco accounts for one vendor master.
I did mentioned customization in SPRO :-
1. Maintain the Alternative Reco accounts
2. Select the ready for input check box of Recon accounts.
But still system is not accepting to change reco account while doing the MIRO. Change happens while doign the FB60
Rgds
SumaMani

HI sumamani,
As you are aware that it is not possible to change the reconciliation
account in MIRO.In transaction FB60, it is possible to change the field
value. SAP give us only the permitted account maintained in the
customizing table THKON.
In MM, the accounts are automatically determined from the
customizing in transaction OMWB, or taken from the purchase order
account assignment data.You can also have a quick look in tr OMRMB,
you will notice that field INVFO-HKONT is not there to be customized.
There is no solution available within the SAP standard system for the
change of the reconciliation account for the vendor.
According to the information I got from the responsible development
department I can only inform you that the required functionality will
not be implemented in SAP standard for MM invoice verification.
Field in question is hard coded and can not be changed.
MM invoice verification was developed to finish the external procurement
process in logistics and check the invoice data sent by the vendors for
correctness (differences) and to post the corresponding accounting
document in FI additional.
Creating manually creditor invoices in FI have no relation to a logistic
process.
Therefore not all functions included in FI (FB60) are included in MM
invoice verification (MIRO) as well.
reg
Madhu M

While doing MIRO with unplaned cost system is picking accurel G/L account

Dear All,
While doing MIRO with unplaned delivery cost system is picking accural G/L account rather than cost element from PO.
Thanks
KMR

Hi,
It depeneds how the Unplanned Delivery Cost has been configured for the comany code.
SPRO>Material Management>LIV>Incoming Invoice>Configure Unplanned Delivery Cost.
Against Comapny Code put blank if : Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the invoice items ( here the Materil account or the Account in the PO will be used. )
Put 2 if : Unplanned delivery costs are posted to a separate general ledger account ( here the posting key UPF will be used to determine the g/l account ).
Thanks and Regards

Upload shipment Cost to Inventory while doing STO

Hi all,
I want to know that whether it is possible to upload Shipment cost to Inventory in Intra company STO.
I have assigned vendor to my recieving Plant in this way system is allowing me to do Inbound delivery & then capture shipment cost but since in Intra company STO while doing PGR no accounting entries take place so system is not picking shipment cost while doing PGR. whether I am missing something Please update.
Thanks
Nitesh

Hi,
If you follow carefully steps from note 427944 you will get it.
Rate if helful.
Regards, david
Please refrain from begging for points, it is against forum rules
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Apr 8, 2011 1:18 PM

Error while doing MR11 as enter Profitability segmet as Cost object

Hi All,
While doing MR11, we noticed a error message (ZC - 001) as "Enter Profitability segment as Cost object for Revenue and COGS posting".
The specified Material account is created as Cost element (CE Category 11) and in OKB9 configuration this cost element is choosed (ticked) with the option "profitability segment". Also there is no substitution rule to derive profitability segment in OBBH substitutions.
However there is a validation (GGB0), where the above specified Material account is included in the range of accounts in the Prerequisite, and Check as "Profitability segment is > (greater than) 0000000001 and with the message maintained as "Enter Profitability segment as Cost object for Revenue and COGS posting".
Can any please help why this error has come at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards
Karun

Hi Eli,
Thank you very much for reply.
I hope the note 184987 is not applicable in our case as the Field status of specified Material account does not have required entry for Profitability segment.
Can you please let me know if we have entry in OKB9 and existance of entry in Validation creates the problem and throws the above error message?
With regard to other note 134484 which you have specified on "error in Account assignment check in MM transactions" says "A detailed default account assignment (for example profitability segment) was defined in Transaction OKB9. However, the profitability segment is not set up correctly for goods movements: the characteristics material, plant, business area are missing. A later check of the profitability segments against material, plant and business area then generates an error message since the profitability segment is inconsistent".
Is there any way to confirm whether this situation is leading to our error before implementing this note.
Thanks & Regards
Karun

Error while doing Std.cost estimation.

Hallo gurus,
I am facing one problem while doing Std.Cost estimation.
Let me explain in detailed..
I am doing costing estimation for a Product. This product contains both Bought out Material and Customer Supplied Products.But both are coming as Material class as Raw material.
But Overheads to be calculated differently for those means for Bought out product - 1.5% and for Customer supplied Products-5%.
So i have created one Overhead Key and the same is attached to Overhead
Group and this overhead group is attached to a respective material.
In Costing sheet for overhead i have selected Dependency D010 and maintained the same along with Overhead key..
But while executing CK11N, system is not calculating the same.
Pls through some light on this....
Advance Thanks..
Regds,
Janardhan.

Did you attached the costing sheet in costing variant?

Recursive Loop Error while doing standard cost estimate

SAP Gurus,
We are trying to do standard cost estimate on a material and we are getting error because it is going in recursive loop even though we have used "recursive allowed" indicator for item components in the BOM. The error message numbers are CK 730 and CK 740. We are using 4.6c. I have tried the same scenario in ECC 6.0 and still I get the same problem.
Below is my BOM structure:
Material 10890345 (has low-level code 012)
        ---> 10867220 (has low-level code 013) and has recursive allowed indicator
10867220
        ---> 10846733 (has low-level code 014) and has recursive allowed indicator
10846733
        ---> 10890345 (has low-level code 012) and has recursive allowed indicator
According to me, the BOM for material 10846733 is causing the problem.
For some weird reason while doing the costing run for material 10890345, it s not stopping and going in a loop.10890345 and 10846733 should ideally have the same low-level code as they are recursive.
Please help to provide some solutions at the earliest on how to avoid recursive loop during costing.
Regards,
Swapnil

Dear,
I have 2 things to shear with you.
The method we followed to solve the iteration is as below
1.Config change -
Valuation variant in the costing variant, we changed the sequence as below
material valuation
4 planned price 1
2 std price
3 Mov ave price
2. Material master change
made all the semi finished goods and finished goods
procurement type = E,
costing with qty structure,
Enter the planned price1
By doing this what happens is
when system first start the iteration, takes the planned price 1 and start iterating and next time in the second iteration it takes the calculated price from qty structure till it finds the difference between the value calculated is less than .001. Then it gives the result
Why lot size is important is, in our case in some levels the usage is very less compared to the first material header qty and system used to stop in between and not even reaching the last level as during the cycle it was reaching less .001 difference. may be in your case it may not be the case...just check
Please come back after trying this. this was the only last option i had to solve the issue in my client.
Another alternative is to have a different material for costing purpose to stop the iteration which i will not recommend as we need to do some calculation for each stage and input the cost of dummy material in each stage.
My client is happy with the result as the difference between manual calculation and system calculation is less then .1%...this is because SAP will not consider the difference beyond .001, but in excel you get as many as decimals you want.

Components Quantity Increased while doing the costing second run in 2011

Hi,
While doing the second costing run in same year (2011), we found there was a change in components quantity (increased) and this is not exaptable / wrong.
dispite the fact that we did not make any change in the BOM of this SKU between the two calculations and there is no cost lot changes. There is no Price change also.
Can any one explain, What are all the possibilities to increase the component quantities.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar
Check if there is % Consumption scrap in material master data and BOM item.
I believe this is the only way you can increase consumption without changing the quantities in BOM.
Regards.

Unplanned cost to be captured while doing at MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for