Unplanned costs cannot be posted through MM

Hello MM Gurus
Scenario : Create PO for vendor A , buying an item , Do GR , then pay the invoice to Vendor A . Unplanned costs were incurred for the delivery of the item and the delivery wa shandled by Vendor B
How can we pay Vendor B and still refer to the PO created for Vendor A ...these costs are for the PO created for Vendor A ?
Your answers will be appreciated : will award points

Hi Warona,
You can pay to vendor B if you put fright condition in PO and assign B vendor in that condition DETAILS
When you do IV vendor B will be proposed for freight payment
Hope its clear to you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

Similar Messages

Non PO documents parked in FV60 cannot be posted through FBV0.

Hi,
I am trying to post a document parked through FV60 in FBV0 Tcode, but the system says that the document is already posted in that compnay code even though it is in parked condition.. I tried posting some other parked documents but the system is showing the same error. It is only happening to documents parked through FV60. The documents parked though FV50 can be posted.
Can anybody help me solve this issue.
Thanks,
Vardhana Reddy.

Please check the database of deriving the actual state of the document.
Check the table VBKPF and VBSEG whether the entry is there in the database of not.
Unless and until we get to know the state of document at the data base level , it would be difficult to comment.
Cheers,
Dewang

Unplanned cost in miro

Dear Forum,
I would like to seek clarification on unplanned cost book during miro.
For planned, it will credit vendor debit freight clearing account.
For unplanned, it only can be prorated and distributed in the po item lines. Unplanned cost cannot be posted entirely to any account by itself. correct? why?
1) example for unplanned cost, say unplanned cost is usd300. i must distribute this usd300 to po line items. when distributed to the po line item, sure there is a difference, hence system will post the difference to price difference. correct?
2) why cannot book unplanned cost of usd300 to a specific account? say like credit vendor debit 1 specific acc usd300.
Need help on these 2 points.
Thanks

If you configure a g/l account for unplanned delivery cost,it will definetly hit that acct,no need to distribute amt all p.o line items.
Acct document will be Vendor Cr GR/IR Dr Unplanned delivery cost Dr.
or other wise try subsequent debit in MIRO(to add freight cost).

Unplanned cost

hi,
i would like to ask on unplanned.
1) unplanned cost for moving average price material when post in miro, cost will go to price difference or stock? why?
2) unplanned cost for standard price material. when post in miro, cost will go to price difference or stock? why?
thanks

SPRO>>IMG>>Materials Management>> Logistic INvoice Verification>>Incoming Invoice>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
For each company code set whether
1. Unplanned delivery costs are distributed among the individual items in proportion to the item amounts invoiced so far and the item amounts in the current invoice.
or
2. Unplanned delivery costs are posted in a separate line. You must enter a specific tax code for the posting.
Scenaro 1: Moving Average Price with enough stock coverage
Unplanned cost will be posted to stock account if the material has moving average price control (provided stock coverage available for the material)
Initial Stock: 100 PC Initial Stck Value: 1000 USD Moving Average Price: 10 USD/PC
You are ordering 100 PC @ 10 USD/PC
During Good Receipt:
Stock Account: 1000 USD
GR/IR Cleaing Account: 1000 USD
total stock after good recietp = 200 Pieces
During Invoice Receipt: (Unplanned Delivery Cost 100 USD)
Total invoetory = 200 Pieces
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
Vendor Account: 1000 USD
Stock Account: 100 USD
So total stock 200 PC
total value = 1000 (initial stock value) + 1000 (recent good receipt) + 100 (Unplanned delivery cost) USD
Total value = 2100 USD
Moving Average Price = 2100/200 = 10. 5 USD (after IR with unplanned delivery cost). This is under impression that the plant/storage location has enough stock coverage)
Scenaro 2: Moving Average Price without enough stock coverage
Unplanned cost will be posted to stock account and price difference account depending on the stock coverage during invice posting if the material has moving average price control
Initial Stock: 100 PC Initial Stck Value: 1000 USD Moving Average Price: 10 USD/PC
You are ordering 100 PC @ 10 USD/PC
During Good Receipt:
Stock Account: 1000 USD
GR/IR Cleaing Account: 1000 USD
total stock after good recietp = 200 Pieces
During Invoice Receipt: (Unplanned Delivery Cost 100 USD)
Before posting invoice the 150 PC has been issued to production
Total inventory = 50 Pieces (200 -150 PC)
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
Vendor Account: 1000 USD
Stock Account: 50 USD
Price Difference Account: 50 USD
So total stock 50 PC
total value = 500 +50
Total value = 550 USD
Moving Average Price = 550/50 = 11 USD (after IR with unplanned delivery cost). This is under impression that the plant/storage location doesnt have enough stock coverage)
Scenaro 3: Standard Price
Unplanned cost will be posted to price differnece account account if the material has standard price
Initial Stock: 100 PC Initial Stck Value: 1000 USD Standear Price: 10 USD/PC
You are ordering 100 PC @ 10 USD/PC
During Good Receipt:
Stock Account: 1000 USD
GR/IR Cleaing Account: 1000 USD
total stock after good recietp = 200 Pieces
During Invoice Receipt: (Unplanned Delivery Cost 100 USD)
Total inventory = 200 Pieces
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
Vendor Account: 1000 USD
Price difference Account: 100 USD
So total stock 200 PC
total value = 1000 (initial stock value) + 1000 (recent good receipt) + 100 (Unplanned delivery cost) USD
Total value = 2100 USD
Standard price of the material remains same as 10 USD/Pc

GL Account : Cannot be posted to cost object, please check your entry

Dear All,
I've problem in general posting or in FBCJ (cash journal) ....
When I try to make journal : Debit Expense and Credit Cash in F-02 or in FBCJ then I chose Post an error appear " Cannot be posted to cost object, please check your entry " ..
Because GL account "Expense" assigned to cost element, I need to fill cost object ... when I filled it with Internal order or WBS, the error appeared , but there was no error when I filled with Cost center ....
For your info there was no problem with Field Status Group ( I thought ) cause I ticked with Optional entry for WBS and IO ...
Beside it, I've assigned the company code in Controlling Area and Operating Concern ...
Network in WBS was in optional
Please give me solutions
BR,
David Sindhu
Edited by: david_sindhu on Jan 26, 2011 12:06 PM

Hi Alex,
The posting key was 40 and there was no problem as I choose Optional ..
My WBS was not statistical ...
Any idea ?
Edited by: david_sindhu on Jan 27, 2011 3:18 AM

Getting Error while posting through KB11N : No true sender object entered

HI Expert,
We have stastical internal order defined and same we are using in Asset. Let me explain the scenarion.
We created the Purchase requisition with the stastical Internal Order then we did Purchase Order and MIGO -Goods Receipt.
Now we realised that wrong Internal Order was used. Now we want to tranasfer cost from that Internal order to New Internal Order. we are trying to post through KB11N but while giving the all details i am getting error as per below;
No true sender object entered
Message no. BK175
Diagnosis
You have entered a statistical object as a sender. Statistical objects, however, are only intended for use with dual account assignments.
Procedure
1. If you require a dual account assignment, enter a true object as a sender also.
We are using cost element with having cost element category 90.
I don't no which is the true sender Object.
Thanks in advance
ealry help will be highly appreciated.

Your postings had happened to a statistical internal order. I hope the real postings might have happened to a cost centre.
You cannot settle anything from a statistical internal order. It is just for information purpose only. If the above posting had captured a cost centre (real posting), you can distribute/assess the cost from the cost centre to a real internal order for your purpose.

Category for message 06356: No delivery costs can be posted in case of mult

Hi experts!
I know why the system issues message "06356: No delivery costs can be posted in case of multiple account assignment", but I need to set this message as an ERROR because it is a WARNING by default.
I tried it via SPRO -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Environment Data -> Define Attributes of System Messages, but it doesn't works. Although I set the message as an ERROR I tested and it is a WARNING message.
I tried via SM30 with no positive results.
Do you have any suggestion?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
Message 06356 is coded in standard as warning
and cannot be changed through customising
Message 06 356 is hardcoded as "Warning"
Review of the Abap code reveals the message is hardcoded, see:
Include: MM06EF0W_WE_RE_KENNZEICHEN
: mmpur_message 'I' '06' '356' '' '' '' ''.
If you wish to change this message to an error you will have to modify the code.
It is not possible in the standard to set this message as an error
Delivery costs are not posted for documents with multiple account
assignment in Release 46C.
This was allowed in releases 3.0, but this functionality was deactivated
in Release 4.0A for design reasons. For more information on this issue,
please, see note 77789.
In the note it is stated that:
"Even if you do not delete the delivery costs, the system does not
process them during the goods receipt, the invoice receipt and in the
purchase order commitments."
Kind regards,
Lorraine

Field Profit Center is not populated while posting through T-Code F-02

Dear Sir / Madam,
While posting through T-code F-02 the field Profit center is in hidden mode
as a result I am getting the given below error.
"GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled"
Please guide me as to how do I change Field status varient so that the field Profit center gets activated in optional mode in F-02.
I tried searching the same but could not find the solution.
Regards
Chirag Shah

Dear expert
Check following steps...
1. Use transaction ACSET and enter cost center as your account assignment for type 01 APC posting..
2. Make sure Cost Center exists in the Asset Master..
3. Make sure profit center is entered into Cost Center master.
4.Check the steps where you assign the GL accounts to the splitting rules.
suggest you to go through the below mentioned links
Balancing Field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
Balancing field "profit center" in line item 001 not filled
GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
F-51: Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
Balancinf field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Regards,
Ajeesh.s

Error while reversing document posted through cash desk

Hi,
I have posted a payment through cash journal/cash desk (FPCJ) and closed the the lot. Now I want to reverse the payment, however SAP function module 'FKK_CJ_PROHIBIT_RVRSL_OF_DOCS' is throwing an error - 'reversal not performed'. Does anyone know how to reverse a payment document posted through cash journal if it's lot has already been closed?
Thanks,
Suhas.

HI Ravi,
If a payment is posted through the FPCJ and lot is closed , payment cannot be reversed that's is standard functionality, there are lot of notes on this which gives you alternative steps that need to be taken.
check note 644870.
thanks,
Vikram

How to distribute Unplanned cost on Material

Hi Gurus;
I want to distribute unplanned cost on material. In my case Material Vendor & Unplanned Cost (Freight) vendor are different. In PO there is no provision for unplanned cost and we have already booked the GRN.
I have seen blogs, and accordingly, first post the vendor invoice (For Material) and now when i go for subsequent debit for freight charges in MIRO - I don't know what to do. Since there is no pending material against the PO.
Please suggest the required steps.
Thanks in advance.
Devendra Singh Chauhan

Mr. Jürgen L.
During subsequent debit: In MIRO, AT BASIC DATA TAB: I Entered Invoice Date - 20.11.2010 & Posting Date 30.11.2010, Amount 500 USD, Tax (V0 - Exempted from Tax)., Reference (Document no of Invoice). Below that I selected On header I select "Purchase Order/Scheduling Agreement & Goods Received/Service Items", Enter the Purchase Order No.
Now on Payment tab - Entered BaselineDt-30.11.2010; System taking due on date automatically - 29.11.2010.
On detail tab: I entered Unpl. Del. Cst - 500 USD, change the invoice party - from original vendor to transporter vendor.
But situation is SAME.
Now, click on SIMULATE Button, I shows only Credit Amount:
Position-1: A/C type "A", Account - Freight Vendor Name; Amount: 500- USD.
At footer it shows: Debit: 0.00 Credit: 500.00 Balance: 500.00-
Where I am making a mistake.
DSC

Tolerance key Unplanned cost in miro

Hi,
how can tolerance % maintain for Unplanned cost in MIRO so that posting can be blocked for payment.
any user exit or Std BADI ?
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Hi Jayakathan,
Which BADI will help me given in this notes ? as per ur expertise.....
Is This work
BADI MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS to check if unplanned deliv cost amount = %(Of Value of Invoice)
Then the payment block indicator ZLSPR = A.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination - MIGO

Hi,
I have made PO with reference to the contract. While posting the MIGO error message displays as "Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination. But with same combination ( Materials and Vendor which were used in Po from Contarct) was used to prepare a PO with out any reference, subsequent MIGO transaction was saved without any error msg. This problem is happening the MIGO through PO reference of Contract or MIGO for schedule line agreement. So your help pls.
Veera.

hi
u have to check Note 1059878 - Error after the Note 1043857
Summary
Symptom
1.When you try to post a goods receipt (MB01/MIGO) against the purchase order, you get an error ME 573 "Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination". This is caused by the code from the Note 1043857.
2.Also,when you have note 1043857 implemented and then try to do a price comparison (ME49)among the RFQ,you see the message 06 616 'selected quotations not directly comparable'.This is again caused by the code from the Note 1043857
Other terms
UNICODE, GTKOMK-KEY_UC, GTKOMK, MIGO, ME49,Price comparison, 06 616, ME 573
Reason and Prerequisites
This happens after the code from the Note 1043857.
Solution
Please apply the code correction below.
regards
KI

Why we assign cost center while posting to any G/L

Hi All,
I need one clarification.
Why we assign cost center while posting to any G/L, even though we have been assign cost center to the cost element it will post the co entry through cost element.
Please any one make me understand the internal logic and process of how cost element and cost center works.
Thanks
Nandha
help.sap.com

Find below your clarification for the points
Why we assign cost center while posting to any G/L, even though we have been assign cost center to the cost element it will post the co entry through cost element.: Once you have assigned cost center to cost element in T.code OKB9 or KA01, no need of manually entering the cost center for the respecting primary cost GL while passing enteris.
Please any one make me understand the internal logic and process of how cost element and cost center works.: Whenever you post a cost to primary cost element , you require an object in Controlling , such as cost center to identify the costs. This primary costs are only created when the respective GL exist in the operational chart. Cost center is the location where cost incurs. Thus when you assign the cost to cost center , the cost will be booked against that particular location .

Delivery Cost to be posted in full during the first GR itself

Hi
I have a requirement where in i need to create a new condition type "Delivery Cost" in the purchasing pricing procedure. This should post the fixed delivery cost as given in the PO completely during the first GR itself, irrespective of the partial GR's done.
Will try to explain it with an example -
Say a PO is created for 100 qtys and this has a delivery cost of 100 GBP.
I do a GR for 55 qty, here the delivery cost should be posted as 100GBP only not 55GBP.
Can this be handled in the standard Pricing procedure? if yes what setting needs to be done.
If this cannot be handled in the standard pricing procedure how to achieve this,
Please advise.
Thanks
Regards

hi,
this is acheived by std configuration .
use the freight condition FRB1 (fixed amount) with A/C key ( FRE ) and Acuural ( FR1 ) in pricing .
if u use it as item condition , for each GR , for that item irrespective qty , it will charge full freight amount.
if u use it as header condition , for each GR , for that PO , freight amount will be charged irrespective of qty & no of items.
regards
vengaladasu
Edited by: vengaladasu on Aug 11, 2008 3:58 PM
Edited by: vengaladasu on Aug 11, 2008 4:23 PM

Error: Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination

Hi,
I am facing below error when i try to post GR for a SA. I checked out all the configurations, these worked on GR for PO but not on SA.
I have seen other posts which recommend to view OSS note 447374 and 446831. I am not sure where to find these and how to use these notes.
Please help!.
Thanks
Ramya

Here you go
Transaction cannot be posted due to errors in price determination
Message no. ME573
Diagnosis
The error marked with 'X' occurred during the price determination process for purchasing document 201 00010:
[ ] Net price is 0.
[ ] Net price is negative.
and/or there are no valid conditions or the duration of the
contract has ended.
[ ] Effective value is negative.
[X] Mandatory condition missing.
[ ] Negative delivery costs.
[ ] Delivery costs have been recorded although invoice
receipts are not defined for the item.
[ ] Error during quantity conversion
[ ] Error during currency translation
[ ] Field overflow
[ ] A condition involving delivery costs exists without a
transaction/event key.
[ ]Error during maint. of delivery costs in master conditions
Delivery cost conditions in different validity periodsnot identical
System Response
The transaction cannot be posted without successful price determination.
Procedure
Check the purchasing document and the associated conditions:
Display purchase order
Display scheduling agreement
If the problem cannot be resolved in this way, contact your system administrator.
The latter can check the Customizing settings for price determination in Purchasing under Conditions -> Define Price Determination Process
When the foregoing steps have been carried out, try posting the transaction again.

Unplanned costs cannot be posted through MM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for