Updation in fund center

Dear SAP Experts,
Please tell me the method to automatically update the Fund centre budget once the cost centre budget is updated
Thanks & Regards,
Reva.

hi
check is there any substitution is used in finance for line item

Similar Messages

  • MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Hello!
    Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
    Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Rona

    It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
    Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
    I am sure this will help.
    Regards,
    Amar Lal

  • Updation in fund center through cost centre.

    Dear Friends,
    Please tell me the method to automatically update the Fund centre budget once the cost centre budget is updated
    Thanks & Regards,
    Reva.

    Dear Mar
    Thanks for your valuable reply.
    The functionality of post Purchase Orders vide T Code FMN4N is working fine on most of the cases of Purchases Orders created before the activation of Funds Management, but it is not having any effect on some Purchases Orders created before the activation of Funds Management. It is showing them as analysed but is not reconstructing them nor any error message is given. But there is no error log or display log for them.
    Even these un reconstructed POs are not displayed in the SAP standard report FMRP_RFFMEP30X - Line Items .
    The reconstructed Pos are getting displayed in the FMRP_RFFMEP30X - Line Items .
    Would appreciate an advise in this regard, how to get the remaining POs reconstructed.
    Warm Regards
    D Gupta

  • Fund center and commitment item not updated

    Hi!
    We are using Funds Management together with SRM. When we change the value of e.g. cost center and not the account assignment itself we do not get an update on fund center. When changing account we do not get an update on commitment item either. This is standard SAP and we have been asked to use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. Have anyone else had this problem?
    I would really appreciate if anyone have some code for this BADI or any other badi e.g. BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. It is only important that changes in PO when replicated to back end results in the correct update of commitment item and fund center.
    Sincerely
    Andres

    Solved through BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI

  • Error while Updating Fund Center in Work Order

    Hi All,
    In out System, we have integrated PM-FM. in that, we have incorporated a "User-Exit" which populates the User a change-of "Cost Centre" just while saving the order; where the User can insert any other Cost center other than the one already picked & displayed by the System.
    The problem now in FM is that; the initially displayed cost center prior to the update of cost center; is the one that is picked by the FM Derivation Strategy; which does not get updated when the new cost center is updated.
    Hence, although the Order contains a new Cost center; the Fund Center displayed is the one that was mapped to the prior cost center according to the FM Derivation Strategy in FMDerive.
    Kindly help !!
    Thanks in Advance.................
    Regards,
    Pratham

    Sahu
    Can you also post a screen-shot of the error message popup.
    PeteA

  • How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

    hi Experts,
    Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
    Line  in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx   does not contain any commitment items
    Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
    The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Change/Updation of old PRs, POs with FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center etc.

    Dear Experts
    We are implementing Funds Management-BCS in our Business.
    The effective Year is FROM 2011 Financial Year.  And we are creating the FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center, Budget Period with Valid From Date is 1st April 2011.
    Also we made the configuration settings of "Allow BLANK as Value for Account Assignment Elements" is TO YEAR 2010 Financial Year.
    Our questions are: 
    1. When we make any changes in the old Purchase Requisitions, Purchase Orders etc., created in Financial Year 2010 or before; whether the system will check that 'Valid From date' of Fund, Fund Centers should be on or before date of Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order creation date or not?
    2. When we try to update old open PRs, POs which are created in Finanicla Year 2010 or before with FM Objects i.e. Fund, Fund Center etc. through Transaction Code FMCN; whether the system will check that 'Valid From date' of Fund, Fund Centers should be on or before date of Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order creation date or not?
    We request you to provide your valuable suggestion/information.
    Thanks and Regards
    PVSRG

    Hi Gupta, how are u!?
    P.V.S.R. Gupta wrote:
    > When we implemented FM-BCS effective from Financial Year 2011; why the system is expecting to contain/having FM Account Assignment Objects in old PRs, POs etc., existing in the Financial Year 2010 or before?
    You active BCS for year 2011, thats all right., but if u have got FMDERIVE rules, when u change PRs or POs the strategic derivation detect this operation and try to input Assignment Objects.
    Please try to trace that chances with TRACE tool from FMDERIVE.
    If u need more help about trace, please check the OSS note: [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322].
    Make an entire process, and view the log
    Regards,
    Osvaldo.

  • Update Fund & Fund center data in auto generated PR during MRP RUN

    Problem in the MRP auto generated PRs.
    The normal PRs created manually have all relevant fields of fund center viz CO area ,commitment item,Funds center, fund.
    But the problem is with respect to the Purchase Requisitions generated automatically during the MRP RUN.
    How to include the fund centers in MRP generated PRs automatically in the creation stage itself instead of going into change mode using ME52n Transaction code and change it to include fund centers one by one for each line item.
    We require this as we have hundreds of PRs generated every day.

    Hi,
    In order to fulfill this requirement, transaction FM_MRP_PR should be used.
    Please also take a look to FM_MRP_PR on-line documentation :
    The PRs generated from the MRP run are considered as planning documents
    and do not have any impact on the budget. To encumber these PRs in the
    corresponding settlement receivers, you have to execute this program for
    the relevant PRs.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • Wrong fund center updation in financial entry

    dear all,
            I am facing the typical problem with system , we have created service P.O with fund center xxxx and trying to do the service entry sheet by adopting the services from P.O and changed the Fund center to yyyy.
           we have used the same service number multiple time in one S.E.S and changed its fund center to yyyy. when  we release the S.E.S its financial entry are showing some with xxxx and some entries with yyyy fund center in single S.E.S for one service.
    can any one explain, how this happends and suggest the solution..!!
    Regards,
    Manu

    hi
    check is there any substitution is used in finance for line item

  • Derivation of Funds Center from cost center for Asset PR/PO in FM

    Hello Experts,
    We configured new FM area and relevant BCS settings. It is working fine except PR or PO for Account assignment category A.
    Issue: system is not able derive funds center from cost center in the asset master. cost center is not updated in EBKN table for Asset PR.
    we have maintained the following;
    1. Funds center is activated in Asset account assignments
    2. Maintained derivation rule with function module: FMDT_READ_MD_ASSET
    3. Derivation rule for cost center to funds center also maintained
    If maintain funds center manually in PR it is working fine and consuming budget also.
    Requirement: How derive funds center from cost center assigned in asset. I have verified all tickets raised in this forum, but nothing has answered my question.
    Request you to provide solution for above issue.
    Thanks in advance for support.
    Regards,
    Chalapathi

    Hi Venkata,
    You have two derivation rules, first related to Asset function module and second one is related to CC and FC combination.
    You need to maintain the function module derivation rule first then you need to maintain the derivation rule related to combination of CC and FC. Because first you need to derive CC from asset master and then you need to derive fund center with reference to this CC.
    Regards,
    Ankit Agarwal

  • Commitment Warning w.r.t Fund Center from PO

    Dear All,
    We've Activated Funds Management as per the client requirements.
    But I am facing the following issue w.r.t commitment update.
    Details:
    Creating the PO w.r.t to Fund center & commitment item as A/c Assignment.
    I've created Formal Budget for selected fund center/Commitment item which is assigned in PO
    Tolerance Limit also activated for availability control with 80% warning & 90% as Error Msg.
    Issue:
    But, during creation of PO, even though it is crossing the 100% of assigned budget, availability control is not working due to which system not giving error msg,
    If anyone any idea on this type of issue, please guide me how to resolve this.
    Note:  I've created PO, GR also, but in Commitment/Actual Report under Funds Management, system showing 100% as Available Amount.

    Are you using Former Budgeting or BCS, "Budget Control System"
    If you are using BCS, try reconstructing the budget using FMAVCREINIT
    If you are using Former Budgeting, use FMBV or FM9P

  • Funds Mangement - Fund center derivation error at the time of PO/MIGO

    Hello -
    Generally ,If FM account assignements are available in purchase requisition , same should be carried to purchase order and to the good receipts. But I am getting an error at the time of PO or MIGO that " Fund center not derived'. Why this happening ? What can I do to avoid this problem. can I create a step in the derivation to keep the original FM assignments from the previous documents....is there something to do with field status??
    Thanks in Advance
    Chris

    Hi
    Please read carefully tye warehouse concept
    Excample warehouse concept II
    >At PR no FM update
    >At PO no FM update
    >AT GR no FM update
    >AT consumption on Cost center, WBS or Internal order FM is updated and AVC is checked
    Read the release note of ERP 6 or ERP5 the customising of Warehouse concept is well explained
    In sumary:
    Create a stock commitment item statistically
    Create a warehouse funds center
    Create a funds
    Create a derivation rule for warehouse concept 2
    Create a derivation rule where you have plant, valuation class and warehouse funds center
    Cretae a derivation rule fund>warehouse funds center>stock commitment item
    Go in customising integration to make field status for assignement FM account asignments
    Select PO and PR and make optional the funds, funds cenbter, commitment item
    And when you will create a PR or PO FM data will come automatically
    ciao
    Salvator
    PSM-FM Consultant
    BXL

  • Item 010 Fund Center/Commit Payment Budget Exceeded (FM)

    Hi Expertise,
    Our user executing FMJ2 transaction to carry forward purchase requisition (PR) / Purchase Order (PO) from 2014 to 2015 (April to March) by that time getting the below error message, but budgets are available for 2015.
    Item 010 Fund Center/Commit Payment Budget Exceeded
    Another user also facing the similar issue while create new PR in the current FY-2015 with different commitment item & fund center, still getting the same error, but budgets are available for 2015.
    Kindly share your views and ideas, its urgent.
    Thanks,
    Jammy

    Hi Jammy,
    Please check the following hints about this matter:
    1) To be on the safe side, please run report RFFMRC04 in test mode, to see if there are differences between the line items and totals table.
    If errors arise, please run it in update mode, whithout other budgeting/posting activities occurring at the same time (otherwise you may encounter differences). Then, please reconstruct the AVC totals (FMBV for Former budgeting, FMAVCREINIT for BCS).
    2) Reassignment during fiscal year change also uses the Derivation strategy for reassignment (transaction FMYC). Please verify if you have defined in FMYC a different FM account assignment (funds center and commitmente item) than the one that you are expecting.
    I am not sure if you have Former Budgeting or BCS, therefore consider also the following:
    3) IF you are using Former Budgeting, I guess you are getting BP629. Please check report BPINDAN2_NEW and  if the 'Assigned budget' is same as the 'Commitments/actuals' the values are ok and budget is missing. If the values are different, you must run report BPINDX03 (FMBV) first to correct it.
    4) IF you are using BCS, I guess you are getting FMAVC* message. For this, use transaction FMAVCR01 to verify your budget consumption and make sure that the budget was updated for payment budget not commitment budget (as per the error message that you are receiving).
    5) Please check how this UOM (unit of measure) is defined in transaction CUNI.
    In this transaction, you can set the Value-based commitment indicator.
    This indicator controls whether commitments for the chosen unit of measure are
    recorded on a quantity basis or a value basis. If the indicator is not set, the
    commitments are managed on a quantity basis. If you set the indicator they are
    managed on a value basis.
    For value-based updates, the reduction of purchase order commitments occurs
    with the maximum of goods receipt and/or invoice value. For
    quantity-based commitments, the reduction of purchase order commitments occurs
    with the maximum of goods receipt and/or invoice quantity.
    Example:
    You create a purchase order with the quantity of 1000 at the price of 10.
    You post a goods receipt related to this PO with the quantity of 500 at the
    price of 9.
    For value-based updates, an amount of 4,500 is updated.
    For quantity-based updates, an amount of  5,000 is updated.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards, Vanessa.

  • Funds center and commetment item

    Good evening!
    We are HCM consultants. We were asked by our FI department to conduct a
    post run for two personnel numbers in development system.
    After the post run, the documents consider errors which say, for
    example, that "in position 00001 21 993-05 commitment item was not
    determined". 21 is a company code, 993-05 is a G/L account. This error
    occurs for numerous accounts. Our FI says that they have customized
    everything for 21 company code and have put commitment items for every
    G/L account. They ask whether it is possible to customize fields for
    funds center and commitment item in HCM, IT0015 where we determine
    account assignment.
    In the SAP course IPS910 they found a passage about HCM and FI
    integration where is said that "Funds center and Fund can be determined
    for org. unit/position/personnel. In addition to funds center and fund
    there can be determind also a commitment item for info-types
    considering account assignmet (0014,0015,2001-2005,2010)".
    We in HCM guess that there is something wrong with FI customizing, 'cos
    in HCM it's impossible to activate those fields, or even if it
    possible - it's wrong.
    The question is - is it possible to add fields for funds center in HCM
    (IT0015) or it's not worth doing?
    Best regards,
    Eldar       
    Steps for Reconstruction    
    1. In HCM all the entris are standard. We made entries in IT0015,
    started payroll and posting.
    2. FI made their customizing for 21 company code.

    Hello Eldar,
    I will provide you some hints below.
    1) To have the integration between PSM-FM and HCM, in PSM side you should check:
    SPRO (IMG)
    Public Sector Management
    Funds Management Government
    Actual and Commitment Update/Integration
    Integration
    Integration with Human Resources (HR)
    Please check all the sub-menus there and the documentation available in from of each link. It is very good and provides some links for all the customizings that needs to be done.
    2) Check also the configuration as it is described in the enclosed note 766613. It is related to view V_T588N.
    3) If Funds Management and Controlling are updated in an integrated way such that the cost center is always the leading account assignment and the fund center is derived, the HR must not (and does not) support the maintenance of derived information (such as fund center). Thus there are the following three possible scenarios:
    - Funds Management (FM) is not active.   -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
    - FM is active but without CO-Integration-> HR shows Fund Center
    - FM is active with CO Integration       -> HR doesn't show Fund Center
    With CO Integration turned on, the derivation functionality is utilized to determine the Fund Center in HR. However, if you are looking for manual input in the FC field (and subsequent saving of this value on
    the database), all I can provide would be a modification to inform HR that the FC field is active.
    To perform that, you would need to make the following coding change to give HR the indication that the field should be displayed and edited:
    FUNCTION FM_DC_GET_ACTIVE_DIMENSIONS:
        if ( CO-FM-Integration is on )
           IF ( l_f_fm01-co_integration = con_on ).         <   Delete
           IF (  l_f_fm01-co_integration  =  con_on AND     <   Insert
             NOT l_f_fm01-co_int_start_hr IS INITIAL ).     <   Insert
           IF (  l_f_fm01-co_integration  =  con_on AND
    You will need to perform the necessary testing in HR to ensure that it is functioning as intended as I am unsure of the differences in the HR functionality between 46C and ECC 600.
    These scenarios can be maintained with time dependence (active from-dates): There can be a period for the first, a second time interval for the second and a third time interval for the last scenario.
    4) Please check if you have implemented note 918775. It should be present in your system
    5) Please check if you have implemented note  755796. It should be present in your system
    6) Please check also the note 701933.
    I hope I could help you 
    Let me know your comments if I am going in the wrong direction.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • CHanges to Funds Center HIerarchy not reflected in STS

    Hello,
    I wonder if the changes that I made to say Funds Center hierarchy should be automatically reflected in STS. Currently when I upload new hierarchy to BW from R/3 my hierarchy never gets updated for STS. Is this a normal procedure that I have to manually re-import hierarchy in BW to STS, or this is abnormal?
    Thank you

    In my experience the changed hierarchy has to be re-imported to the STS subplan.
    (Even if the hierarchy was automatically changed, it would still be necessary to assign names, functions,  to the new elements).
    Regards Stephen

Maybe you are looking for