Upgrade to 10.5 fails - Not enough diskspace in Common Partition - db_hist using most of the space

Hi All,
Tried upgrading our UCCX 9.0(2) SU1 HA deployment to 10.5(1) last night and it failed with the following message -
There is not enough disk space in the common partition to perform the upgrade. Please use either the Platform Command Line Interface or the Real-Time Monitoring Tool (RTMT) to free space on the common partition.
RTMT reported the Common diskspace used as 94%. Using RTMT we set the LogPartitionHighWaterMarkExceeded to 55% and waited for diskspace to free up. No such luck.
A little more investigation and it turns out there is a database called db_hist_dbs in the Common partition that is 33GB in size. This is the command and returned output we used to find this out -
show diskusage common
8.0K    /common/moh
33G     /common/var-uccx/dbc/db_hist_dbs
1.6G    /common/var-uccx/dbc/temp_uccx_dbs
201M    /common/var-uccx/dbc/uccx_er_dbs
1.6G    /common/var-uccx/dbc/uccx_ersb_dbs
37G     /common/var-uccx/dbc
37G     /common/var-uccx
16M     /common/ontape_backup.gz
8.0K    /common/cancel_upgrade
Using this command - show uccx dbserver disk - we can see that the db_hist database file is actually 80% free! Output from the command here -
SNO. DATABASE NAME      TOTAL SIZE (MB) USED SIZE (MB) FREE SIZE (MB) PERCENT FREE
4    db_hist                            34508.6                6836.9                  27671.7            80%
Anyone have any ideas on how to shrink the file size of the database in question? Is it even possible? Or what are our options to get around this and perform the upgrade.
Thanks in advance
Jeff

You may be running into this bug: CSCul18667
Symptom:
CUIC log purge does not clean up JMX folder. Upgrade may fail due to lack of space.
"show status" command show's that logging is consuming 99% of space
Workaround:
Can delete by going to RTMT -> Trace & Log Central -> Remote Browse -> Nodes -> "specific node" -> UCCX -> Cisco Unified Intelligence Center Servicability Service -> jmx -> select all -> Delete

Similar Messages

Cant reimport my iPhoto Library because not enough Diskspace ???

I had to get an older Version of my iPhoto Library 200Gb in size, so i made a backup and restored the old version. Now i want to get back to the original version, but i cannot load the backup ob this file via Time Machine because there is not enough Diskspace, so i am told. And thats where it gets funny. Finder tells me i have 330GB free, the Harddiskutility tells my i have 90Gb free. I had checked the harddisk and it is okay, no error reported. Still Finder says 330GB and the other tells 90GB. *** is going on here.?? OmniDisksweeper reports also 180Gb in use on a 500Gb disk, so where are the 240Gb free space ?

With the amount of information you've provided it's impossible to offer a solution. We can't see your computer so we need to know the details of your problem and setup, i.e.:
what version of iPhoto are you using?
what system version are you running?
what are you seeing the exclamation point? When you double click on a thumbnail?
what fixes have you tried?
where is your library located?
did you apply any updates or upgrades just prior to the problem occurring?
are you running a "managed" or "referenced" library?
what type of Mac?
how much free space on your boot drive?

Help: startup-config file open failed (Not enough space)

Who can help me ? I've an uc500 and he stil running. Now i want to change something and want to save the configuration first. But the following message appears : startup-config file open failed (Not enough space)
this is the output from a dir flash:
Directory of nvram:/
227 -rw-       25897                    <no date> startup-config
228 ----        1933                    <no date> private-config
229 -rw-       25897                    <no date> underlying-config
    1 ----          83                    <no date> persistent-data
    2 -rw-           0                    <no date> ifIndex-table
    3 -rw-         577                    <no date> IOS-Self-Sig#1.cer
    4 -rw-         615                    <no date> IOS-Self-Sig#2.cer
    5 -rw-         660                    <no date> vlan.dat
    6 -rw-         107                    <no date> cca.xml
    7 -rw-         586                    <no date> IOS-Self-Sig#3.cer
262144 bytes total (227094 bytes free)

OK.
Try this:
conf t
service compress-config
And see if that helps.
If not, see if you can tftp the running config off the router and TFTP it back to startup-config:
copy run tftp
copy tftp start
Then you can try a reload and see if it is cured.
I googled and found a few cases where alot of ACLs or NAT rules could cause MALOC errors (you would see those in your logs) when implemented and could manifest itself in this condition, which could be cured after the next reload, which is why I suggested that.
Of course, dont be remote when you do this and only do it during a maintenance window.
Steve

Reproducible error when loading many reports (Load report failed - Not enough memory for operation)

Environment:
Win 7 SP 1
Visual Studio Pro 2012 Update 4
Crystal Reports for Visual Studios Service Pack 10 (13.0.10.1385)
Report created in Crystal Reports XI Release 2 (11.5.8.826)
Targeting x86 .NET 4.0
Scenario:
We have a program that runs and creates a large number of reports before the process is ended. When running after many hours we'd get a Load report failed/Not enough memory of operation exception. I kept removing code and found i could reproduce just using the report.Load call. I simplified the report to a completely blank report to make sure it was nothing specific to a report I was loading. (Opened Crystal Reports XI Release 2, Save As, "Blank.rpt".). I then created, loaded, and disposed of this report in a loop. I was able to cause the same exception after 32,764 iterations on my machine. I also tried using .NET 3.5 same result. I added a counter to our main program and it also went through 32,764 report loads before the same exception was thrown. Main program uses 15 or so different reports with a variable number of subreports in each.
Sample Code to illustrate the problem:
I did this as a WinForms project since our main program is using winforms.
References added:
CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine
CrystalDecisions.ReportSource
CrystalDecisions.Shared
CrystalDecisions.Windows.Forms
using System;
using System.Windows.Forms;
using CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine;
namespace CrystalTest
    public partial class Form1 : Form
        public Form1()
            InitializeComponent();
            int i = 0;
            try
                while (true)
                    i++;
                    ReportDocument report = new ReportDocument();
                    report.Load("Blank.rpt");
                    report.Close();
                    report.Dispose();
            catch(Exception ex)
                MessageBox.Show(i.ToString() + ex.Message);
Exception:
CrystalDecisions.Shared.CrystalReportsException: Load report failed. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80041004):
Not enough memory for operation.
   at CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.ClientDoc.ReportClientDocumentClass.Open(Object& DocumentPath, Int32 Options)
   at CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.ReportClientDocumentWrapper.Open(Object& DocumentPath, Int32 Options)
   at CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.ReportClientDocumentWrapper.EnsureDocumentIsOpened()
   --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
   at CrystalDecisions.ReportAppServer.ReportClientDocumentWrapper.EnsureDocumentIsOpened()
   at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.Load(String filename, OpenReportMethod openMethod, Int16 parentJob)
   at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.Load(String filename)
   at CrystalTest.Form1..ctor() in c:\Test Projects\CrystalTest\CrystalTest\Form1.cs:line 27

int = Int32. No it's not the "counter" that's causing the problem. The max size of an int32 is far far larger than 32764.
I am disposing and cleaning up the datasets in the main app. That is why I didn't include them in this test; they aren't relevant.
I'm unsure why this test program is completely irrelevant. It throws the same exception, at the same count, as the main program. It does it in substantially less lines of code than our main program. I spent days running long tests to figure out exactly what I needed to make the problem appear so I could post a clean and precise post on these forums. I then created the test program to illustrate that.
The "real" code as I said does stuff in sections and in a certain order.
For each report I need to export based on rows in a table
1. Creates a new Report Document
2. Loads the report document with the report
3. Creates a dataset of the data to display
4. Calls SetDataSource
5. Calls Report.ExportToDisk
6. Disposes DataSets
7. Closes/Disposes Reports
To help isolate the problem I first took out the export to disk part (Step 5). The problem still occurred. I then took out everything related to our data. (Step 3, Step 4, Step 6). The problem still occurred. And yes I commented out this code in our main real program. This left me with:
1. Creates a new Report Document
2. Loads the report document with the report
7. Closes/Disposes Reports
At this point i had to prove it was not dependent on the report. This makes sure it's not a database connection, or pulling too much data into the report. The most efficient test for this is a blank report.
So my order of operations becomes...
1. Creates a new Report Document
2. Loads the report document with a blank report
7. Closes/Disposes Reports
So you'll see this is exactly why I wrote this test the way that I did.
I've had a run where it error on iteration 32761. My last runs have errored on 32764. I have had many runs over many weeks that all error with the same exception.
There are no temp files left behind, With a test running you can see the temp files being added but they are immediately removed.

I recently took my imac in for a recall on the hard drive, they replaced my hard drive, i used time machine to restore all my files. Now when I turn time machine on it says back up failed not enough space, it is not overwriting old back ups.

I recently took my imac in for a recall on the hard drive, they replaced my hard drive, i used time machine to restore all my files. Now when I turn time machine on it says back up failed not enough space, it is not overwriting old back ups. Why? Please help

http://pondini.org/TM/FAQ.html

Failed: Not Enough Access on Workflow

Hi!!
On the Sub-status on planning workflow for some members display this error Failed: Not Enough Access , this is because security access??? because the member had the user access...

Dear John,
I faced with the same issue. The Planning unit hierarchy has additional dimension "Segment". Thus, for the Entity "entity1" was chosen one of the segment, for example, "corporate". The user has write access to the members "corporate" and "entity1". So, in process management he can see two planning unites:
entity1
entity1: corporate
He can change status without errors for "entity1: corporate" but the error message "Failed: Not Enough Access" appear when he tried to change status for "entity1".
I would be grateful if you would explain particularly what is wrong with access permissions.
Thank you.
Andrew

HELP: ld: fatal: file /dev/zero: mmap anon failed: Not enough space

Trying to build a debug version of our code using Solaris 10 and SunStudio 12, and we get this error:
ld: fatal: file /dev/zero: mmap anon failed: Not enough space
Any idea?
The ld process grows to ~4GB then dies.
The compile server has plenty of memory and swap available.
Any idea? Our program is getting quite large, but I am sure there are larger ones out there.

The only suggestion I have is to switch to stabs debug format (-xdebugformat=stabs compiler option) and don't specify -xs so that most of debug info is stored in .o files. Maybe it'll save some linker address space. Other than that, try asking on linker forum:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=63
I know that it's a hot topic and you will probably get an answer as soon as someone from linker team take a look.

"install failed: not enough install space" error

I have a Palm Pre and am getting a "install failed: not enough install space" error when I try to install an app unless I remove one first.
The phone shows that I have 5.8GB of space left.
I'm guessing that this means there is a limit as to the number of apps that can be installed.
Does any one know of any way to increase the number of apps that can be installed?
If not I guess I'll kill some of the worthless Spring apps on there...
Any help you can provide would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Christian
Post relates to: Pre p100eww (Sprint)
Post relates to: Pre p100eww (Sprint)

I am at WebOS 1.1.0. The app itself does not matter, i.e. I can uninstall an app and after that, I can add another. When I get the error, it does not matter what app I tried to install, from where, or what method.
I can replicate the issue no matter how I try to install an app:
Through the official Palm store (developer mode on or off doesn't matter): I get an error "Sorry, Not Enough Memory. Please delete an application you have installed to make room"
Through FileCoaster: I get an error "install failed: not enough install space" error"
Through the SDK "drop to install" method: a DOS window opens and it looks like it's installing the app, but it never shows on the phone, so the install seems to fail
I haven't tried installing the app through Novaterm, if it helps narrowing down the issue, please let me know and I'll give that a shot.
Based on Flipflop 84's comments, it seems like there seems to be a limited amount of space reserved for apps (since he has less apps than me and is getting the error) rather than the number of apps being the issue. 5.8GB of free space are somewhat worthless if I can't use the space for apps, so I'd like to allocate an additional Gig of that to apps.
So I guess the question has changed to "how do I increase the amount of space available on the Pre for installing apps?"
I would think that would be simple for the Linux Gurus out there that seem to be able to disect and analyze the WebOS down to the atom level, but surprisingly, I haven't been able to find any information on it (and I'm a Linux noob myself, so I'd have to clue where to start looking).
If you guys need me to try anything or need more information on anything, please let me know.
I appreciate everyone's help with this!
Christian

Time machine backup fails--not enough room.

I have a 2 TB drive in a Mac Pro running Yosemite (10.2) that I have been using for Time Machine backups. I have a 1 TB drive as my main hard drive that is about 2/3 full and another drive with less than 200 GB used. Unit recently, Time Machine has been working as it should. However, in the last week, I have been getting an error message saying there is not enough room (321 GB available). As I understand the process, older backups should be deleted when there is no longer enough room. Additionally, it should only be updating the backup and there should be enough room for that. Why can I not get a backup?

Try C4 in the 1st linked article.
Time Machine Troubleshooting
Time Machine Troubleshooting Problems

My ipod is telling me there is not enough storage and I cannot back it up as there is not enough icloud storage. I am unable to close the message or go onto settings.

my ipod is telling me there is not enough storage and I cannot back it up as there is not enough icloud storage. I am unable to close the message or go onto settings.

Try:
- Reset the iOS device. Nothing will be lost
Reset iOS device: Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
- Then delete some stuff

I have the new iphone and thought I could download Netflix but only found "Netflix Instant's Best Movies" in the apps. I pay for Netflix monthly. Is it not possible to download it here and use it on the iPhone?

I have the new iphone and thought I could download Netflix but only found "Netflix Instant's Best Movies" in the apps. I pay for Netflix monthly. Is it not possible to download it here and use it on the iPhone? Insight appreciated.

TJBUSMC1973 wrote:
The iPhone is working, as designed and advertised. In this case, the user failed to educate themselves properly, either by proper research or asking the right questions, before purchasing the device.
I understand that the OP failed to do research. But then, I wasn't replying to the OP. I was replying to Chris. I have Verizon. I can talk and use data at the same time with my Droid Maxx. Therefore, the problem is not just with the network. It would be technically possible for an iPhone to do that on Verizon/Sprint if Apple had chosen to use a different chip, such as the kind other phone manufacturers have elected to use.
Of course, this is probably all irrelevant to the OP's issue. It was merely a point of clarification, especially for those people who are used to being able to use both voice and data at the same time on Verizon. When they switch to an iPhone, they are often surprized at the limitation.
Best of luck.

Clicking on a link in Mac Mail Firefox does not open in front of Mail--it used too. The link does open but I have to click on the Firefox icon in the Tray to bring it to full screen. Can you please help

clicking on a link in Mac Mail Firefox does not open in front of Mail--it used too. The link does open but I have toclick on the Firefox icon in the Tray to bring it to full screen. Can you please help.

Thanks Jason, I had the same problem and did exactly the steps above. Problem solved! You rock! :)

Safari does not show url address line. google is taking up all the space...

safari does not show url address line anynore. google is taking up most of the space on the safari page

Hover the cursor over that line until it becomes a big plus sign with arrows on the left and right. Click and drag the cursor so that the rest of the address line is the way you want it.
(66963)

Service Partition - Rescue and Recovery installation fails (not enough free space)

Im am aware about former posts to this subject on this forum, but they didn't answer all my questions, so I reopened the subject.
I tried to install "Rescue and Recovery" on T60 with win XP Pro and got the following message:
'There is not enough free space in the boot sector to install the Rescue and Recovery boot manager'
I followed the solution in "Rescue and Recovery installation fails") from 08-09-2008 03:03 AM
and created a hidden partition with Parted Magic but the rescue and recovery still fails with the same message.
Somewhere in the forum I read that the original service partition has a special format and not ntfs.
Could somebody tell me is it true or not ?
How can I rebuild this service partition ?
Do I need special setting, flags there ?
Is it possible to rebuild this partition without recovery CDs at all ?
Actually I'm wondering to, about the error message. It is saying '"..There is not enough free space in the boot sector ..." .
Is it possible that the boot sector is the problem and not the service partition ?
How can I fix that ?
Thanks in advance if somebody helps.

I have a 4-year-old ThinkPad R51. Because I was getting intermittent boot-up error messages--"Rescue and Recovery has encountered a problem and needs to close"--with ver. 4.0, I tried to upgrade to ver. 4.2. Per instructions, I first removed ver. 4.0 using Windows Control Panel. Then each attempt to install 4.2 failed with the message: "Error 25025. There is not enough free space on the computer to install or upgrade the Rescue and Recovery environment." Just before that error message popped up in center-screen, I got a Windows message at lower right saying "You are running out of space on SERVICEV001 (Z:}" Of course, there was no way I could view partition Z (that I knew of).
Thanks to the helpful messages above, I downloaded Parted Magic (http://partedmagic.com), burned a boot CD per its instructions, and re-booted with that CD. Using GParted, I saw that my SERVICEV001 partition was merely 590 MB, and 587 MB was in use. So I reduced my C partition by 500 MB and added 500 MB to the Z partition, raising it to 1090 MB. Then I was able to re-boot into Windows and the installation of Rescue and Recovery 4.2 was error-free.
Out of curiosity, I again re-booted with the Parted Magic CD to see how much space on the Z partition was taken by the RnR ver. 4.2 installation. To my surprise, it showed that still only 587 MB was in use, and 503 MB remained unused.
I thank those in this forum whose messages gave me the needed guidance. And I thanked the author of Parted Magic with a $10 donation, as I hope other users of his open source program will do.
Message Edited by DougSchafer on 08-08-2008 06:06 PM
Message Edited by DougSchafer on 08-08-2008 06:12 PM

Kstat_lookup() failing: "Not enough space"

Hi,
I have a peculiar problem. I'm looking up CPU statistics using kstat(), and I'm getting a failure in kstat_lookup() on some machines.
Here is the relevant code:
kstat_ctl_t* pKstatCtl;
kstat_t* pCpuStats;
if ((pKstatCtl = kstat_open()) == NULL)
// Handle error...
if ((pCpuStats = kstat_lookup(pKstatCtl, NULL, -1, "cpu_stat0")) == NULL)
// Handle error...
... // kstat_read(), etc.
I am compiling this program on Solaris 2.6, and it works fine on every 2.6 machine I've used. It is interesting to note that, when I run "truss" on the program and watch the results of iostat(KSTAT_IOC_READ), it returns a number in the range of 600-800. I think this is the number of bytes read.
When I run this program on a Solaris 2.8 machine (without recompiling it there, for reasons which are too complicated to explain here), it works most of the time. However, one of these 2.8 machines is having problems. The kstat_lookup() call fails, and strerror(errno) returns "Not enough space". Note that it's not the kstat_read() that's out of space, it's kstat_lookup(). I tried running the program on another 2.8 machine in the same cluster, and it worked. However, truss told me that ioctl(KSTAT_IOC_READ) was returning 264752.
What's going on here? Why is kstat_lookup() failing with "Not enough space"? Why does this work on one machine and not another?
Thanks,
Chris

Jason - the discs may be advertised as having 4.7GB of space, but in fact this is a bit of an urban legend - it all depends on how you count the bits, in groups of 1000 or in groups of 1024. Disc manufacturers like to count in 1000's, which gives a larger capacity, whereas your computer will count in groups of 1024...
If you allow 4.37GB per disc, you'll be much nearer the mark.

Upgrade to 10.5 fails - Not enough diskspace in Common Partition - db_hist using most of the space

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for