Ussing different g/l accounts for depreciation postings for some costcenter

Is it possible to use in some cases for the depreciation (based on cost centers) different G/L accounts.
We have arround 20 asset classes and don't want to make 40 extra asset classes
Is here for config or a user exit?

Hi Paul,
you will not get this via config I think.
But there would be a way to go I think. You can code out BAdI BADI_FIAA_DOCLINES. There is a method CHANGE_DOCUMENT with which you can realize your requirement. This BAdI is processed within the FI-AA line item generator, close before the end. In there you have influence to the internally created AA documents. If you want to realize your requirement, you can first check that the process you started is the depreciation run (reference procedure AMDP):
maybe like that:
  CHECK is_rlambu-awtyp = 'AMDP'.
Then you can exchange the accounts in ACCIT.
But you have to remind that whatever you change in here is not reflected within FI-AA standard functionality. If you exchange expense accounts, reconciliation will not be possible any more with standard tools.
Regards,
Markus

Similar Messages

  • Change document type for Depreciation postings

    I need to change the document type for depreciation postings due to document number conflicts resulting from inter-company code depreciation (reference OSS note 51860).  But the system will not allow me to do this because "depreciation has been posted" AC 086 (depreciation <u>has</u> been posted in prior months).  Does anyone know of a way around this?
    Thanks,
    Cynthia

    Hi Cynthia,
    Have you tried Tcode AO71. You can probably change document type for dep posting by company code.
    This does not work for you?
    Let me know.
    You can reach me at [email protected]
    Thanks
    Ajay

  • Movement Type 261 - Different G/L account to get debited for same Movement

    Hi Friends,
    I need your help to solve the following issue
    We are in the process of implementing ECC 6.00. One of our client requirement is for Movement type 261 , different consumption account to get debited for different types of issues. i.e. incase of MT 261 issue for maintenance order the consumption account should hit to Maintenance G/L and incase of MT 261 issue for production order different  consumption account to get debited.
    I think One way to meet this requirement is by creating new Movement type by copying MT261 and assigning new Account Grouping to that MT and assigning GL in GBB against the new account grouping.
    I would like to know is there any other way to meet this requirement in SAP.
    Request you earliest advise on this issue as we are in the stage of final integration test
    Thanks
    Deva

    Dear
    If the solution works fine please do let me know in detail as we have the same requirement.
    Thanks and Regards
    JS

  • Post freight cost to a different a GL account during 411-K for consignment PO Process

    We are planning to implement PO consignment for one of the client.
    The scenario is, client pays the freight cost to the supplier in advance upon receipt of consignment stock .When consignment stock is moved to own stock (411k), during the movement of the stock we need to create two accounting entries one for the material cost and the other for freight cost such that the freight can be adjusted with advance paid freight cost. Freight cost can be settled manually with another PO but the requirement is moving average price of the material should include the  cost of material  and freight cost .
    For an example if the material cost is $100(PB00) and freight cost is $10(FAR1 - 10%), during 411k it  should create  two entries one for material cost($100) and the other for freight cost($10) which can be adjusted manually.
    We tried by adding freight condition (FRA1) in consignment info record along with PB00 –Gross price and in this case during 411k it is summing both the prices($110) and posting to one GL account and the same settles during MRKO  but what we are looking for is how we can split this into $100 and $10 .
    I know standard SAP does not support this this during 411k.
    I want to know if there is any User exit, pricing procedure, routines, etc...  Or any other way that can be used to achieve this requirement. Appreciate more detailed answer

    Hi,
       As you know, currently the delivery cost are not supported in consignment and pipeline settlement. The system design is explained in the note: 208555 - MB11 Delivery costs for pipeline and consignment.
       If you want delivery cost in consignment, you have to go for development. There should be additional entry for delivery costs in RKWA table. I am not sure about the feasibility, but still would like to share the below points:
       For creating additional entry in the accounting document while doing MB1B / MB11, you may check the BADI AC_DOCUMENT.
       You may refer the note: 165647 - Documentation: Enhancement RMVKON00 (MM-IV) which explains some enhancements related to consignment settlement.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Can a derived depreciation area be a real area for depreciation postings?

    Example :
    Book area 1 (real)        : $100,000
    Area 2 (not real)          : $120,000
    Derived area                : Area 2 minus Area 1 = $20,000 (depreciation calculation based on this)
    Is above possible?

    Hi,
    the F1 Help of the field "real depreciation area" says:
    Set this indicator if you want the system to store the values of this depreciation area in the database (meaning that the area is not a derived depreciation area). The values in this area are then updated each time a posting is made, and can be immediately evaluated.
    regards
    Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Oct 25, 2010 10:02 AM

  • Vendor Ageing Analysis Report for the postings for this fiscal year

    Hi All,
    I require report that lists every supplier that my company has spent money in this fiscal year, need the actual average payment terms, number of days etc. And also how much has been spent with each supplier.
    Kindly let me know the report or the process to extract this data from SAP R/3 system.

    Regarding Ageing analysis of Vendor below three reports may meet your requirements provided transactions to the vendors are done in disciplined manner.
    S_ALR_87012078 - Due Date Analysis for Open Items
    S_ALR_87012084 - Open Items - Vendor Due Date Forecast
    S_ALR_87012085 - Vendor Payment History with OI Sorted List
    Regards,
    Alok

  • FA:- stop the crete accounting and Depreciation calculation

    Hi All
    I am trying to stop the crete accounting and Depreciation calculation for some selected Assets in R12 can any one tell us is this possible if yes than how can we do it.
    Regards
    Ajay sharma

    Hi,
    you can stop the depreciation calculation for a particular asset by unchecking the depreciate check box in that Asset
    Regards
    Muthu

  • Screen layout rules for depreciation areas

    Hi Experts,
    One quick question. Where do we see screeen layout rules for Asset depreciation areas. SPRO path or transaction code to view this would be helpful.
    Regards,
    Santosh

    Hi Ragini
    Thanks for reply. It seems transaction code OA78 is wrong. It says transaction code OA78 does not exist. I am working on SAP R/3 4.7 version.
    I know that we can define screen layouts for depreciation areas through transaction AO21.
    However I would like to know how can we find out screen layout assigned to a particular asset or particular asset class.  In transaction OAOA we can see screen layout rule assigned to asset class, but not screen layout for depreciation areas for that asset class.
    Any pointers on this would be highly helpful.
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Possibility of individual V2 postings for depreciation

    Dear experts,
    We have implemented parallel accounting using account method for
    company code 3DEM. Thus, for depreciation area 10 we have configured it
    to do a V2 update posting.
    While posting depreciation, the system generates two accounting
    documents - one for area 01 and other for area 10. However, the
    granularity of postings is different. It seems the posting for area 10
    are getting summarized at some level.
    Is there a possibility of getting the same number of line item postings
    for area 10, corresponding to the postings in area 01.
    This will help us in reconciliation. Thanks.
    Regards,
    Vishal Thakur.

    Hi Vishal,
    Can you please let me know the below details?
    1.  Depreciation areas created, the target ledgers
    2.  Posting in GL Indicator set for deprecaition areas.
    What i have understood from you posting is, when you execute the depreciation run you want to post some values to depreciation area 01 and different values for another depreciation area connected to Non-leading ledger. 
    If it is so, you can have a ledger group with only non leading ledger and assign it to Target Ledger Group  (depreciation area you are using for non - leading ledger).
    Regards,
    Kiran Yelamarthy

  • How to Open & Close the periods in Asset Accounting for Depreciation.

    Dear All,
    How to to How to Open & Close the periods in Asset Accounting for Depreciation ? Please let me know
    If there is any T.Code or procedure for it.
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Pankaj.

    Dear Alex ,
    1) I am facing one problem that one of my asset 123 I Capitalized on 13.09.2006 have deactivated on
    14.05.2008. with value of Rs.1.00.000/- all the activities are closed down related it on deactivation date.
    In 2009 a new asset 456 purchased with different value. But in T.code OARP in column cumulative acquisition
    value it is showing value of Asset 123 instead of it's own capitalization value.
    2 ) And about my Asset 123 it is also showing a Cumulative Acquisition value in year 2009 which it
    should not display because I have already deactivated that asset. ( The same checked in AR03 )
    Please help.
    Your help is highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Pankaj.
    P.S :- Keep the discussion on for further assistance.

  • Automatic account postings (for Intercompany Purchase order and Sales order

    Hi all,
    I need some help related to the automatic account postings (for Intercompany Purchase order and Sales order)which i can set for the follwoing scenarios. I have looked on the forms and searched alot but not able to a single solution to solve both the pupose. if one scenario works the other doesnt. Please advise.
    I have created the master data
    Customer receiving--G001
    Sales Org.--GXIN
    Distr. Channel- 01
    Division - 00 
    Company code receiving - G1
    customer supplying- V001
    company code for supplying- V1
    2 different scenarios
    1- Intercompany Purchase order in which a Customer receiving- G001, gets stock replenishment NB purchase order from supplying company V1- GI  and GR of stock is done. Biling document for customer receiving G001 is created. But now I need a way to do the opposite side posting at the supplying customer -V001-- this I do using an Idoc which creates a Invoice receipt for creditor(supplying customer) V001.
    2. Sales order-- A customer X001 of company code G1 buys stock from the company code V1. the customer G001 of company code G1 bills the customer X001, but the intercompany billing doc/ invoice is created for the customer G001 by company code V1.  then now i want an automatic account posting to be created at the supplying customer V001 via idoc.
    Can this be achivable via Idoc with automatic account postings.   
    Please let me know if it doesnt make sense. thanks to all in advance
    cheers
    Jasmeet

    Hi all,
    For the Sales order and automatic posting we have created an output type ZR4N- this is creating a batch input session which can be triggered to be processed autmatically.
    For the intercompany Purchase order -from Invoice we are creating a different output RD04 (sap standard) which creates invoice receipt at the vendor side.
    Rest of the settings are defined using SAP standard functionality within transaction OBCA, OBCB, OBCC, OBCD,OBCE
    thanks for viwing the post
    Cheers
    Jasmeet

  • Configuring for different GR/IR accounts for WRX T/E Key

    Hi ,
    I am in a strange situation. I have to configure the automatic postings for MM, in transaction event key WRX. for the rule Valuation class activated, with following example of settings
    Chart of Accounts -- INT
    Transaction key -- WRX
    Valuation Class G/L Account
    ------  191000
    3000 191100
    3200 191101
    4000 191200
    I Created a PO without material master with a material group say 007(services) to which valuation class 3200 is assigned in "Entry Aids Without material Master" in IMG.
    When i do the MIGO for this PO, following entries happen
    Cost center Db
    191000 Cr (this account belongs to blank valuation class and not 3200)
    now my question is Why the system is taking the blank valuation class for this posting and not valuation class 3200 when i have mentioned valuation class 3200 against the materials group mentioned in the PO
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Regards
    Jayesh

    There are more than 100 discussions already exist in SCN about why system is taking G/L account (WRX transaction event key) which is assigned with blank valuation class for that PO which hasn't any material master (Service PO).
    You have pointed the "Entry Aids Without material Master" in IMG, However this is different. Read the document  Automatic Account Determination for without material master.
    Here you will find how the IMG path works.

  • Error AU133: Account 'Acc.dep. accnt.for ordinary depreciation'

    Hi Guys,
    I am tryind to execute the depreciation using AFAB transaction but one of my assets I am recieving the below error:
    Message no. AU133: Account 'Acc.dep. accnt.for ordinary depreciation' could not be found for area 01.
    The cause of that is there is a depreciation posting in a "fake" asset.
    Is there any way that I am able to cancel the depreciation of this asset that is showing in AS03 transaction?
    Let me know
    Thanks
    Daniel

    HI Daniel,
    Goto transaction AO90 and enter 'Acc.dep. accnt.for ordinary depreciation'.
    In newer releases, the system checks these account determinations even though you are not using it.
    The error message AU133 is due to the lacking account definition.
    Please, check for the relevant account determination, chart of accounts and depreciation area, whether you have defined
    account 'Acc.dep.accnt.for ordinary depreciation'.
    Check the customizing for your assets accounts.
    The following notes should be of assistance:
      7595    Account attributes for FI-AA postings
      513376  AC309 in the consistency check for account
      379442  AU133 w/ invoice receipt (Transaction MIRO)
    Kind Regards,
    Fernando Evangelista

  • Two different accounts to be posted for the same valuation class on PGI

    Hi Experts,
    Please note that we want to post two different accounts for the stock offset entry( based on the nature of customer ) in the transaction of PGI in SO. However the valuation class is the same as the nature of the material is same (only the nature of customers is different). We have put one of the two accounts in OBYC GBB - VAX and GBB - VAY.
    Is it possible to have two offset accounts on PGI for the same valuation class.If yes, how will the system identify which one to be posted to.
    Thanks in advance for answers..
    KJU

    hi
    why not create two asset class to easily to separate two situations for two company codes? just a suggestion
    or
    maintain one depreciation key for asset class as a default, if for another company code, just change the depreciation key manual when creating asset master. it is not very complicate.
    or
    create two depreciation areas, one for each company code, then, you will have one useless depreciation for each company code -- not a resonable way
    and, yes, that is the limitation of substituion in AA.
    best regards, Lawrence

  • Hi. I am using a time capsule for few PC s. I have made 5 different account to access time capsule. but in windows when i enter account name and password for one account, i cannot access other accounts, because windows saves username

    Hi. I am using a time capsule for few PC s. I have made 5 different account to access time capsule. but in windows when I enter account name and password for one account, i cannot access other accounts, because windows saves username. how can i prevent this from happenning. I really need to access all my accounts and dont want it to save automaticlly.

    Why have 5 accounts if you need to access all of them.. just have one account?
    Sorry I cannot follow why you would even use the PC to control the Time Capsule. Apple have not kept the Windows version of the utility up to date.. so they keep making it harder and harder to run windows with apple routers.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Restore database in archivelog mode

    Hello everyone. I've been looking on google, how to restore my database on archivelog mode, but i did not succeed. I made my backup using this mode, and now i need to know what is the command need to use to restore this. Somebody can write the comman

  • Why is the sound coming from only one earpiece?

    I just got an iPod nano, and I've had it for a couple of weeks, but a few days ago, the sound feed into my earbuds suddenly didn't work in my left ear. I have tried a different pair of earbuds and even earphones, but it still doesn't work. What shoul

  • Error 'Inconsistent datatypes' with Java classes

    Hi, I have some Java classes loaded in Oracle 8.1.6, mapped as Object Types, so when I create one object from PL/SQL, JVM ought to create the matching Java object, communicating via the SQLData interface. Unfortunately, after the code: pippo:=OraMail

  • PO GR Defaults based on Account *** Cat and Item Categories

    Hi Guys, Using the following SPRO path it is possible to set defaults such as if GR is ticked or not, and if it can be changed in the PO based on the account assignment selected in the PO. MM - Purchasing - Account Assignment - Maintain Account Assig

  • Material Ledger - Error in closing entry

    Hi Gurus, We have an issue running the Post Closing entry of CKMLCP. The system shows the error M8 147 (Account determination for entry &  not possible) for one material, the only one pending material of the costing run. We checked the material maste