UWL tasks run transaction SWNWIEX

Hi Experts,
When I click a task in the UWL, it will open a new window and run transaction SWNWIEX.
Below are the example url that is run when the task is clicked.
hxxp://xxx.xxx.com:xxxxx/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prteventname/Navigate/prtroot/pcd!3aportal_content!2fcom.sime.portal.simeep1_projectfolder!2fcom.sime.portal.SimePortalDesktop!2fframeworkPages!2fcom.sime.portal.frameworkpage!2fcom.sap.portal.innerpage!2fcom.sap.portal.contentarea?NavigationTarget=ROLES%3A%2F%2Fportal_content%2Fevery_user%2Fgeneral%2Fuwl%2Fcom.sap.netweaver.bc.uwl.uwlSapLaunch&System=SONIC_R3&TCode=SWNWIEX&UseSPO1=false&AutoStart=true&DynamicParameter=p_nosecm%3DX%26p_action%3DEXECUTE%26p_wi_id%3D000000498089&CurrentWindowId=WID1202180999515&NavMode=1
Is it possible to change the transaction SWNWIEX to another custom transaction?
Thanks.

Hi All,
I was able to open the task in Wingui by change the GUI type in the standard iview : Content Administration ->Portal Content -> Portal Users -> Standard Portal Users ->Universal Worklist ®->UWL u2013 Launch SAP Transaction.
Thanks,
Vaishali

Similar Messages

Background Task running under initiator not under WF-BATCH

Hi All,
I am trying to resolve a problem with a Background task running under intiator. Since the initiator does not have authorization to execute the task, it is not working.
My understanding was, all background tasks will run under WF-BATCH!!. Is it correct?. in 4.7, it is working this way.
However in ECC 6.00 the background task before the first dialog work item is executed under 'intiator' in this case. I have moved the same task after first dialog work item, and it was executed under WF-BATCH.. I cannot move the task after the dialog workitem as the task need to be executed immediatly after the creation of workflow.
1. How can I run the task in backgroud under WF-BATCH?
2. Inside the task, I am running a BDC to update a flag in downpayment transaction created using F-47. How can I run the process under batch user to overcome the authorization issue that initiator will not authorization.
I am running this workflow in SAP ECC 6.0 level 13
Any help is really appreciated..
thanks in advance for your help.
johnson

This issue can be resolved with triggering the event using the additional flag export parameter 'CREATOR' in function module ''SWE_EVENT_CREATE_FOR_UPD_TASK' as WF-BATCH. I was not passing this parameter and hence it didn't work in ECC 6.0 as it take who ran the process as creator and ran the background task under that users id.
Thanks Rachid for your input to resolve this problem.
johnson zavier

Work items are not visible UWL task are visible in tracking in portal

HI
Friends
i am new from sap Ess/Mss implementation project...
i am facing an Problem " Work items are not visible under UWL in portal overview page"
but i am configured all the ess/mss related things....and also Created for one user for Requester(send Leave Request)...and one more user for App-rover(Apporve an Leave)..
Requestor send an Leave through portal send it successfully......but i am facing a problem in uwl under work items are not showing in overview page...but in tracking work items are (Leave request)showing.....work items are not showing in uwl TASK(VERY PROBLEM)...
i am configured and also registered UWL IN PORTAL..it is good..
in sap ecc i can assigned UWL_SERVICE user to roles
1.SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_UWL_ADMIN
2.SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_UWL_END_USER
3.SAP_BC_ADMIN_USER
4.SAP_BC_UWL_SERVICE
PLEASE HELP ME.
Tanks
Shaik Rafi

Hi All,
In such cases, please try to check as below :
1) Create Leave request work item from Employee and check the same under the UWL Tracking tab of employee.
2) Log-in to swi5 transaction of the respective back end system and give "US" -> manager's UserID -> Choose Tasks to be completed from the drop down -> Remove any date if mentioned -> Execute.
3) Here if you can see the Leave request created, but not on the portal, it reflects some portal issue like sync.
4) If no leave request work item is seen here, then there is a problem in the employee manager mapping or the workflow setup.
5) In such cases, you can try to check the Swi1 and check the log of that workflow to understand the current status of the Leave request.
Revert if further help is needed with more info.
Reward points if found useful.
Regards,
Shri vidya S

Task Flow Transaction Handling Inconsistent between JDeveloper R1 & R2.

We have a solution developed using Jdeveloper 11.1.2.1.0.
To describe the use case I will use the HR schema.
The user must be able to view Regions and navigate to Countries and Locations in a hierarchical way. At each level he must be allowed to view and maintain the detail of the current record at that level. The user must also be able to navigate directly to a level and perform a search to view the data and from there be allowed to to view and maintain the detail of the current record at that level.
So I have created the following design to achieve this and take into consideration that I need to reuse my task flows that maintain the data.
Business Services (Model Project)
1. HierarchyAM, containing Read Only VO’s of the various levels nested by association/view link.
2. Region + Countries + Locations
3. Search#Level#AM, A separate AM for each level, containing the Read Only VO per level.
4. Maintain#Level#AM, A Separate AM for each level, containing an updateable VO per level.
UI (View Controller Project)
I created the following BTF’s (To try and keep the post short as possible I will only provide detail for a single level to explain the issues)
*1. HiererchyBTF*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Added RegionHierarchyBtf, CountryHierarchyBTF, LocationHierarchyBTF to the above fragment as dynamic regions.
c.     Task flow transaction <No Controller Transaction>, isolated.
*2. RegionHierarchyBTF. (The same BTF’s are created for each level in the hierarchy)*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Exposed HierarchyAM<RegionRoVO>
c.     Task flow transaction <No Controller Transaction>, shared.
d.     Includes a call to the EditRegionBTF.
*3. SearchRegionBTF (The same BTF’s are created for each level in the hierarchy)*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Exposed SearchRegionAM<RegionRoVO>
c.     Task flow transaction <No Controller Transaction>, isolated.
d.     Includes a call to the EditRegionBTF.
*4. EditRegionBTF*
a.     Contains a fragment.
b.     Exposed MaintainRegionAM<RegionVO>
c.     Task flow transaction <Use Existing Transaction if Possible>, isolated.
Runtime behaviour with above configuration.
1.     Running the HiererchyBTF and navigation the levels works in all versions.
2.     Calling an edit BTF allows me to edit the current record and successfully commit the data in all versions.
3.     Calling an edit BTF for the same record immediately thereafter, allows me to edit the record and commit the data successfully in all versions.
4.     Running any of search BTF’s and calling the edit BTF works in all versions.
Runtime behaviour and changing the EditRegionBTF task flow transaction to Shared.
1.     Running the HiererchyBTF and navigation the levels works in all versions.
2.     Calling an edit BTF allows me to edit the current record in the table and successfully commit the data in all versions.
3.     Calling an edit BTF for the same record immediately thereafter, allows me to edit the record and commit the data successfully in 11.1.1.4.0 & 11.1.1.6.0 only. If I perform the same scenario in 11.1.2.1.0 I receive the following exception.
a.     JBO-25003: Object MaintainLocationAM of type ApplicationModule is not found.
4.     Repeating the process, but after editing the first record, edit the second record in the table the error is not encountered. If, after successfully editing the second record and committing the data successfully, I again edit the first record I edited, I receive the same exception as in point 3.
5.     Running any of search BTF’s and calling the edit BTF works in all versions.
For the purpose of having a reusable edit task flow, I need to have the task flow transaction configuration as <Use Existing Transaction if Possible>, shared. This enables me to have the edit task flow as a parent as well as a child task flow and use the task flow functionality irrespective if it is controlling the transaction or not.
My questions are;
1. Is my design acceptable for the solution I am developing, I am more specifically questioning my separation of the AM’s to achieve loosely coupled task flows.
2. Is there a bug (I have done a search on MOS) that details this behaviour.
3. As, in my opinion, this is a common requirement, why is there inconsistency between the versions.
The demo for each version can be made available.
Regards.
Leon.
Edited by: Leon Dorfling on Feb 21, 2013 1:44 AM

Hi Frank,
+1. Its the first sting I stumbled on reading your post. Unless the read-only view object AMs are shared across users (application scope) I don't see why you want to have them in a separate AM. I don't see a benefit in a purely read-only view object that is not backed up by entities and thus would follow Oracle's recommendation to always use entities with view objects.+
The read-only vo's are based on eo's. I separated the AM as the search use cases are independent of one another. So my understanding, from a performance perspective, is to not have all the read-only vo's of the entire hierarchy of products in a single AM if I am only going to access one of them. If I do not understand correctly, can you please assist me in better understanding.
+2. For sure this behavior doesn't sound right and should be filed. You may want to check 11.2.3 in case it has been fixed in there already.+
As posted by Chris, I have through MOS found that it has been fixed in a later version.
Btw.: "Calling an edit BTF for the same record immediately thereafter, allows me to edit the record and commit the data successfully" how do you call this task flow dynamic region or task flow call activity ?
The BTF's are called using a backing bean.
Regards
Leon.

Sending UWL task URL via email

I am using NW 2004s Sneak Preview. I have Guided Procedure setup with several tasks to be completed by different user.
I would like to send an URL for a UWL task to a user by email. So User need not go to UWL to check his inbox.
Appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Abhay

Hi Abhay,
UWL connects to GP Runtime and shows the task in a window.
The URL used is the one to GP Runtime.
There are 2 options:
1. You are running in portal:
http://<server>:<port>/irj/portal?NavigationTarget=ROLES://portal_content/com.sap.pct/platform_add_ons/com.sap.caf.eu.gp.folders.gp/com.sap.caf.eu.gp.roles.runtime/com.sap.caf.eu.gp.worksets.runtime/com.sap.caf.eu.gp.pages.procinstance&DynamicParameter=processId%3D<XaX>%26taskId3D<YaY>
2. You are running stand-alone WDp:
http://<server>:<port>/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/cafeugpuirt/Runtime?app.processId=<XXaXX>&app.taskId=<YYaYY>
In both cases you will need the IDs of the process<XaX> and task<YaY>, which can be taken from the GP NWA tool.
Hope that helps.
Best regards,
George.

Can we change the tab sequence in UWL task - ep 7 ?

Hi all:
     We are running ess/mss in ep7. Currently the UWL task display the 4 tabs ( alerts, task, notification, traces ).
     Can we change the sequence from alerts-task-notification-traces to task-alerts-notification-traces ?
     Thanks a lot.

Hi Jianhong,
U have a option at right side corner,right click and u go in personalization.Please see the below blog for more details.
Customizing Default actions of items in UWL
Universal Worklist - when you only need a single tab
Thanks
Regards
Santosh
Reward if helpful !!!

Windows Server Backup scheduled task run successfully but backup do not start (not running) on Windows Server 2012

Hi,
A backup job has been setup on Windows Server 2012 (Platform: Win32NT; ServicePack: ; Version: 6.2.9200.0; VersionString : Microsoft Windows NT 6.2.9200.0) via Windows Backup Software UI (Local Backup 1.0).
It is appearing as a scheduled task "\Microsoft\Windows\Backup\Microsoft-Windows-WindowsBackup" belonging to user 'nt authority\system' in task scheduler.
The problem is that the Backup job never start despite the scheduled task running and completing successfully (when run automatically or manually)!
Would you be able to explain why and assist in resolving that issue?
Here is what we know:
When the backup is run manually via the Windows Backup Software UI, it works fine.
When the backup is run via command line (as set in schedule task) in a cmd command prompt (as local/domain 'administrator' or as 'nt authority\system' which is possible by running command prompt via 'PsExec.exe -i -s cmd'), something like "%windir%\System32\wbadmin.exe
start backup -templateId:{f11eb3aa-74e7-4ff4-a57b-d8d567ee3f77} -quiet", it works fine.
If you manually run the preset scheduled task while logged in as administrator, the task run and complete successfully but the backup job does not start.
Idem if you schedule task is run automatically at scheduled time.
The schedule task run and complete successfully but the backup job does not start.
It is confirmed by running the following in a command prompt as 'nt authority\system':
schtasks /run /tn "\Microsoft\Windows\Backup\Microsoft-Windows-WindowsBackup"
SUCCESS: Attempted to run the scheduled task "\Microsoft\Windows\Backup\Microsoft-Windows-WindowsBackup".
Despite success result, the Backup job does not start running...
No errors or warning appears anywhere in Event Logs (Microsoft > Windows > Backup or Task Scheduler) nor in the scheduled task History tab. The schedule task complete successfully but no Backup job is run...
If scheduled task automatically set by Windows Backup software is duplicated (copied) and set manually it runs fine as 'administrator' and as 'nt authority\system' (subject that 'nt authority\system' is added to the 'Backup Operators' AD group).
Here is an export of the current pre-set schedule task, is there any settings that need to be changed to make it works?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<Task version="1.4" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/windows/2004/02/mit/task">
<RegistrationInfo>
    <Author>MYDOMAIN\SERVER1</Author>
    <SecurityDescriptor>D:AR(A;OICI;GA;;;BA)(A;OICI;GR;;;BO)</SecurityDescriptor>
</RegistrationInfo>
<Triggers>
    <CalendarTrigger id="Trigger 1">
      <StartBoundary>2014-07-14T21:00:00</StartBoundary>
      <Enabled>true</Enabled>
      <ScheduleByDay>
        <DaysInterval>1</DaysInterval>
      </ScheduleByDay>
    </CalendarTrigger>
</Triggers>
<Principals>
    <Principal id="Author">
      <UserId>S-1-5-18</UserId>
      <RunLevel>HighestAvailable</RunLevel>
    </Principal>
</Principals>
<Settings>
    <MultipleInstancesPolicy>Parallel</MultipleInstancesPolicy>
    <DisallowStartIfOnBatteries>true</DisallowStartIfOnBatteries>
    <StopIfGoingOnBatteries>false</StopIfGoingOnBatteries>
    <AllowHardTerminate>true</AllowHardTerminate>
    <StartWhenAvailable>true</StartWhenAvailable>
    <RunOnlyIfNetworkAvailable>false</RunOnlyIfNetworkAvailable>
    <IdleSettings>
      <StopOnIdleEnd>false</StopOnIdleEnd>
      <RestartOnIdle>false</RestartOnIdle>
    </IdleSettings>
    <AllowStartOnDemand>true</AllowStartOnDemand>
    <Enabled>true</Enabled>
    <Hidden>false</Hidden>
    <RunOnlyIfIdle>false</RunOnlyIfIdle>
    <DisallowStartOnRemoteAppSession>false</DisallowStartOnRemoteAppSession>
    <UseUnifiedSchedulingEngine>false</UseUnifiedSchedulingEngine>
    <WakeToRun>false</WakeToRun>
    <ExecutionTimeLimit>P3D</ExecutionTimeLimit>
    <Priority>7</Priority>
</Settings>
<Actions Context="Author">
    <Exec>
      <Command>%windir%\System32\wbadmin.exe</Command>
      <Arguments>start backup -templateId:{f11eb3aa-74e7-4ff4-a57b-d8d567ee3f77} -quiet</Arguments>
    </Exec>
</Actions>
</Task>
Thank you in advance for your feedback.

Once again, the issue is not to run the backup manually from the command line but to have it run via the scheduled task setup by the Windows Backup software.
By default, the schedule task is to be run as NT Authority\System, and when run under this account, the backup does not start (even though account is member of Backup Operators) and job can manually be run via elevated command prompt. This is not a normal
behavior and constitute a major bug in Windows Server 2012.
From my understanding the NT Authority\System account is a built-in account from Windows that should by default be part of the Administrators group (built-in) even though it does not explicitly appears like it in AD by default.
This account shall have by default Administrators rights and Backup Operators rights (via the Administrators group) without being explicitly added to those groups (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/windows/desktop/ms684190%28v=vs.85%29.aspx). By design
it is supposed to be the most powerful account which has unrestricted access to all local system resources. If that is not the case (as it seems) then this would constitute a major bug in Windows Server 2012 edition.
As said previously and as you confirmed, currently by default NT Authority\System on Windows 2012 server cannot start backup manually via an elevated command prompt unless it is manually added to Backup Operators (or Administrators) group. But wouldn't that
constitute a bug of Windows Server 2012?
Our server has not yet been restarted since I added NT Authority\System account to the Administrators group explicitly manually so I cannot yet confirmed it would sort the issue. Indeed it is heavily in use so cannot easily be restarted. Will confirm when
done.
We also have an additional problem where after a while of last reboot, part of the Exchange ECP can no longer be properly loaded in the web browser due to compilation error (compilation is done via NT Authority\System account which seems to no longer have
sufficient right to compile .NET code). What is strange is that it works at first and then stop working at some point... I am hopeful that adding NT Authority\System to the Administrators group would sort this issue as well but once again, that shall not be
needed!!!
Could a Windows Server 2012 update introduced some security policy changes or else that prevent NT Authority\System to have full power?

Email Notifications for both UWL Tasks and Collaboration Tasks.

Hello,
I want to configure Email Notifications for both UWL Tasks and Collaboration Tasks.
Could any one please give me the configuration steps.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sridhar.

Hi sri,
Refer the following threads
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/thread?threadID=147316
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/thread?messageID=315715#315715
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/thread?messageID=1170132#1170132
Regards,
P.Manivannan

Email Notifications for UWL Tasks and Collaboration Tasks

Hi,
I want to configure Email Notifications for both UWL Tasks and Collaboration Tasks.
I done with the all the Configurations suggested in the below link:
[https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/706d054d-da24-2b10-f18a-fc82faf6468e]
But Email Notifications are not reaching the users Lotus Mail ID. Could any one please suggest me that i am missing any Configurations.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sridhar.

Hi Sridhar,
I created a Wiki page with usefull links to troubleshoot problems with the Email connectivity from KM:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/g4KmAw
Please see if it helps,
Robert

Error in executing process from the UWL task list

Hi,
I have created a process and assigned different users to different steps. For administrator, Overseer and Owner, i have kept role as initiator only. For the actions of the process, set the value as Initiation defined and in Default Roles tab, have assigned different users to each of the actions. From the URL generated on instantiation, i created a web dynpro iview and assigned it to a role R.
The UWL has also been configured. The initiator of the process is assigned the role R.
Now the issues are:
1. When the process initiator opens this role R, an error is displayed " Page not found or not available", but the process gets initiated since an entry for the same is made in the UWL task list.
2. Even when I click on the task entry in the UWL task list, i get the same error message.
3. Presently if i click on the role R, then only entry is displayed in the UEL task list. Is there a way in which task may automatically appear in the task list of the initiator of the process without him/her having to click the role and then initiate?
I am not able to figure out why this is happening. Can anyone please help me in this regard.
Thanks & regards,
Anupreet

Hello Anupreet,
Refer to these SAP notes
1104652, 1131403 or 1026119.
This should fix the issue.
Let me know if this works.
Cheers,
Mandrake

Getting UWL task count for all users in a role.

Hi.
I recently posted a question regarding a very similar issue, but I haven't got any response yet. I think my question might have been somewhat poorly phrased, so I will try to do better at explaining what we need.
We have a number of processes, most of which need to be dynamically assigned to a user when created. The way we want to assign those tasks is by executing a WebService which would receive a role name and get all the users for that role. Then, using the UWL API, it would check how many tasks each of the users have in their UWL, and return the UserID for whoever has the least tasks. I haven't been able to get this to work. I keep getting Logged in users context or session doesn't exist Exception.
Please, any help on this will be greatly appreciated.
Currently working with SAP NWDS 7.1 SP05 PAT0005

Hi,
Thank you for your response, however, that's not what I need.
For you and anyone esle who might find this extra info useful...
I know how to get a user's role(s), and how to get the users in a role.
I also know how to assign a task to a specific user dynamically.
Using the UWL API, I know how to get the tasks (or items) in a user's UWL from a WD application, I need to do that from a WebService and using pretty much the same code, with the necessary adjustments, I can't get it to work.
Furthermore, I'm able to get the UWL tasks for ONE user, that user being the one I log into the application with. For example, if I write code to get the tasks for user testUser1, I need to log in with testUser1 to get it to work, if I log in with any different user or make it a non-authenticated application, it won't work.
Again, help on this is much needed and will be appreciated.

Approved Task items are not disappearing from uwl task list

Hi
we have implemended Guided procedures with universal work list. For most of the users, once the any task items are approved, it suppose to disappear from the task list. But it is not disappearing from the task list. Even if i click on "refresh" under flter option. Please let me now how to get rid of this issue.
thanks
vijay

Hi,
Have a look on my reply on the thread:
Uwl tasks status not get updated in Portal
Regards,
Fabio

RE: Reporting after many forte tasks run in batch mode?

Actually, if you're looking for MAKEAPPDISTRIB (I assume that's how you
create distributable) you can see if the command was succesfull or not.
<<deployrep.js>> This Jscript will look for this string and it will
generate a report based on the next line in the log file.
The script assumes you have an environment variable (DESCARTES_ROOT) that
points to a folder (let's say "D:\TEST"). Under that folder you have a log
folder ("d:\test\log") which holds the deploy.log log file. You can easily
change the script to reflect your systems settings.
The generated report looks like that : <<deployrep.txt>>
Norocel Popa
Forte SysEng
(519)746-8110 x 2292
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 1999 11:58 AM
To: Forte-Users (Adresse de messagerie)
Subject: Reporting after many forte tasks run in batch mode ?
Hi,
I would like to know if overnight builds went okay, and therefore need to
parse the log(s).
The issue is that I don't have a proper string to look for (i.e. for
grep).
If I consider 'ERROR", then the following message won't be understandable.
There might a way to cheat with the indentation (i.e. the lines with only
two first blank chars)..
Has anyone experimented such a need ?
J-Paul Gabrielli
DTS
SYSTEM ERROR: Service object MySuperApplicationServer.MySuperMgrSO has
not been partitioned. Therefore, you cannot move it to an existing
partition.
Class: qqsp_UsageException
Error #: [1602, 606]
Detected at: qqcf_StandardConfig::MoveServiceObject at 3
Error Time: Tue Mar 16 17:39:26
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId = B84E6180-D639-11D2-82F2-1863030AAA77:0x244:0x1,
taskId =
[B84E6180-D639-11D2-82F2-1863030AAA77:0x244:0x1.1]) in application
"fscript", pid 22713 on node rambo in environment SuperEnv.

Hi,
To trap error message from Forte log, I usually do this
egrep '(EXCEPTION|Exception|exception|ERROR|Error|error)' filename
This takes a regular expression to 'egrep' all occurrences of "exception" or
"error" not matter they are in upper case or lower case.
Hope this help.
Regards,
Peter Sham.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 1999 12:58 AM
To: Forte-Users (Adresse de messagerie)
Subject: Reporting after many forte tasks run in
batch mode ?
Hi,
I would like to know if overnight builds went okay, and
therefore need to parse the log(s).
The issue is that I don't have a proper string to look for
(i.e. for grep).
If I consider 'ERROR", then the following message won't be
understandable.
There might a way to cheat with the indentation (i.e. the
lines with only two first blank chars)..
Has anyone experimented such a need ?
J-Paul Gabrielli
DTS
SYSTEM ERROR: Service object
MySuperApplicationServer.MySuperMgrSO has
not been partitioned. Therefore, you cannot move it to an
existing partition.
Class: qqsp_UsageException
Error #: [1602, 606]
Detected at: qqcf_StandardConfig::MoveServiceObject at 3
Error Time: Tue Mar 16 17:39:26
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"Fscript_cl9_Client",
(partitionId =
B84E6180-D639-11D2-82F2-1863030AAA77:0x244:0x1, taskId =
[B84E6180-D639-11D2-82F2-1863030AAA77:0x244:0x1.1]) in
application
"fscript", pid 22713 on node rambo in environment
SuperEnv.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:<a href=
"http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/">http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/</a>>

UWL task takes up to 2 minutes to appear

Hi there,
We have a situation where the UWL task takes between 1 minute and 2 minuts to appear in the user's inbox. in our analysis we have found that the task is created immediatly in the business process but it set with an inactive status. After a period of time the task status changes to Ready and the task appears in the users UWL.
We are using NW 7.2 SP3. The task is using WD for Java UI and the "Activate this task by default when creating it" is set in the time constraints. No other time constraints have been set.
Regards,
Christiaan

Hi Paul,
we have the same problem since we move from CE 7.2 SP3 to SP4.
We just created an OSS-Message last week.
regards,
Sid

Double postings after running transaction FAGLF101

Hi All,
After running transaction FAGLF101 some postings double (only in Ledger 0L, YQ seems to work)
While running this transaction, we have to do it twice, with two different valuation areas.
This resulted in double postings for few Adjustment accounts (for example adjustment account foreign payables, adjustment account domestic receivables, etc).
I have checked the Ledgers 0L and YQ. Document splitting is not active.
Can any one suggest me how to analyze further and solve this issue.
Thanks in Advance,
Deepthi.

Hi All,
Can anyone provide any suggestions to analyze this issue please.
Thanks in Advance,
Deepthi.

UWL tasks run transaction SWNWIEX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for