Valuation bases for Different Payments
Hi Guru,
I appreciate if someone can give a detail description on standard rule X012 and how the different valuation bases are generated.
We are using IT554 for position based assignments and is facing an issue when the valuation bases are generated. Sometimes for 4 different payments, about 16 valuation bases are getting generated ( the wagetype is added for /001 & /002).
Considering 2 split periods over the pay cycle , the number of valuation bases should be only 8.
Please help.
Regards
Lakshmy
Hi Gurus,
Let me know some input if the rule X012 process the internal table C1 and if so, how?
Similar Messages
-
Valuation Basis for Different Payment (BWGRL) not working in 2010
Hi
We have a commission wagetype which we entered in IT 2010 in Number/Unit field.
Since we don't have premium id available, we used "Valuation Basis for Different Payment (BWGRL)" to enter the RATE.
This RATE is not working during our payroll run, however when we are using the wagetype with premium ID it is working fine.
My question is- What could be the reason that the Valuation Basis for different payment is not working ?
I checked the wagetype in V_512W_B table and it has the following configuration-
Current wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = 100
1st derived wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = BLANK
2nd derived wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = BLANK
Would appreciate if the the fix could be provided.
Saurabh GargHello,
I think in your case for commision wagetype you need to modify rule $930 to process the override rate from Infotype 2010 BWGRL field in case you are using the US standard schema.
The valuation basis table V_512W_D and rule $930 together will determine the valuation basis.
The default valuation basis comes from table V_512W_D.In case you want to override the valuation basis rate defined in this table,you need to maintain override rate in It2010 and accordingly have the logic defined in rule $930 for that particular wagetype .
Following is the sample rule definition for a similar scenario.
****(commision wagetype)
NUM= ANZHL Set
RTE= BWGRL Set
RTE?0 Comparison
MULTI NRA Multipl.amt/no/rate
SETIN X=NX Set variable split
ADDWT * OT Output table
=
VALBS0 Eval.0.WT in 512W
MULTI NRA Multipl.amt/no/rate
SETIN X=NX Set variable split
ADDWT * OT Output table
Regards,
Malathi V. -
In f110, the DMEs for different payment documents have been combined
Hi,
In f110, the DMEs for different payment documents have been combined.
Two DMEs are created but they are not in separate lines.
Kindly help.
ThanksContd ....
Example 2 - the following is an example of multiple payment documents against each invoice
FH 13062008T1.001 13/06/2008 14:22:27 #
H 10000002 13/06/2008 HSP04 NEFT-S 002-434132-908 INR INR ABNBK A.B.ENTERPRISE 999999
L 10000002 13/06/2008 HSP04 NEFT-S 1900007628 NM 4000.00 4000.00
H 20000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 TRFR-S 002-434132-908 INR INR ABNBK A.B.ENTERPRISE 999999
L 20000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 TRFR-S 1900007629 NM 5000.00 5000.00
H 30000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 RTGS-S 002-434132-908 INR INR ABNBK A.B.ENTERPRISE 999999
L 30000003 13/06/2008 HSP04 RTGS-S 1900007630 NM 6000.00 6000.00
Z ZOF #
Example 3 - This is one payment document against multiple invoices
FH 14032008.001 14/03/2008 10:11:49 #
H 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 072020779001 INR INR HSP01 Srinivas 464646 154 Ba
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 0100000836 NM 200000.00 200000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 0100082351 NM 100.00 100.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106433 NM 10000.00 10000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106552 NM 25000.00 25000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106613 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106617 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106620 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106621 NM 120000.00 120000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106622 NM 12000.00 12000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106677 NM 50000.00 50000.00
L 700013 14/03/2008 HSP01 TRFR 1900106701 NM 1000.00 1000.00
Z ZOF #
Hope this helps.
Thanks and Regards,
Anit
Edited by: Anit Mangat on Aug 6, 2009 11:41 AM -
Calculating valuation basis for ALP (alternate payments) in Schema UT00
Hello Experts!
I have a requirement that I'm trying to fulfill with a PCR but thus far have been unsuccessful.
In the standard schema UT00, rule U010 calculates the valuation bases according to IT0008. If you have two WTs in IT0008 it'll take both into account and calculate the valuation bases.
Here's the requirement I have -
If you enter a PS Group and Level on CATS the standard system would carry out a compare between the CATS entered rate and IT0008 rate and pay the higher of the two rates.
If IT0008 has TWO WTs entered, the standard valuation will take both into account to calculate the valuation bases. If the CATS rate is higher, the CATS rate (valuation bases) is used. The problem here is that it doesn't account for IT0008 WTs at all.
Say for example in IT0008 I have the following entries
WT 1111 - Standard Hourly Rate ($22.00)
WT 1112 - Premium Pay Per Hour ($0.50)
Total = $22.50
No say I enter in PS Group and Level on CATS with rate = $25.00
The standard system will pay the higher of the two, i.e. $25.00
Requirement: Regardless of what rate is paid, the premium pay of $0.50/hour must be paid at all times on ALL A/A WTs.
In the case when IT0008 is greater there's no problem since the second WT is taken into consideration.
In the case the CATS rate is higher, however, we have a problem because the system doesn't consider any IT0008 WTs, i.e. the premium WT of $0.50/hour.
I need to somehow add the $0.50/hour to any rate being taken from CATS.
I tried doing this through a PCR in a lot of different ways but haven't gotten it to work yet.
The problem with the schema is that once it processes all ALPs it assigns the valuation bases (/001) an indicator and the record seems to get locked.
The OT table would read:
/001 $22.50
/001 01 $25.00
When I try to add the additional WT at this point it only adds it to the first record (which already has the additional WT added).
Any help would be greatly appreciated!I used table T510.
-
Valuation class for different services
Hello Experts,
In one of the business requirements, they have around 40-50 different services and each service has to be accounted under different GL codes.
In such cases, when we create service masters, can we have the standard val class 3200 (For services) or do we need to create multiple val. classes. If yes, how many needs to be created for those 40-50 different services .
Regards
MaheshHi,
Just keep one val class 3200 (For services) & create different material groups(40-50)in OMSF t.code to cater your different services(40-50 ) & assign G/Lu2019 with respective material group in t.code OMQW
For more check the links:
Re: material group with vluation class
Re: Material group link with GL account
Regards,
Biju K -
System bifurcated revenue on line item basis for different material in invo
Hi Friends
When i reaised a invoice for three material system showing three line item for the revenue in accounting document. Where revenue G/L is the same. As per my client requirement he want all revenue must posted in one line item in accounting document.
e.g line item posting key G/L amount
1 01 (Customer) XXXXXXXX 6000
2 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -3000
3 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -2000
4 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -1000
Where as per requirement it must post to accounting document
line item posting key G/L amount
1 01 (Customer) XXXXXXXX 6000
2 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -6000
Please help me to solve me the issue.
Regards
Shambhu SarkarHi Friends
When i reaised a invoice for three material system showing three line item for the revenue in accounting document. Where revenue G/L is the same. As per my client requirement he want all revenue must posted in one line item in accounting document.
e.g line item posting key G/L amount
1 01 (Customer) XXXXXXXX 6000
2 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -3000
3 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -2000
4 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -1000
Where as per requirement it must post to accounting document
line item posting key G/L amount
1 01 (Customer) XXXXXXXX 6000
2 50 (Revenue) ABCDEF -6000
Please help me to solve me the issue.
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar -
Using Lockbox want to hit different GL account for each payment
Hi Everyone,
Currently, we have lockbox up and running for credit card payments from third party system and hitting cash account in Oracle.
I want to implement one more payment mode for e.g. ACH, which will hit differed revenue account in Oracle.
1. Now, as the current lockbox is hitting cash, I didn't left with any other option but I ended up setting up new lockbox with deffered revenue account attached to it. Here correct me if I am wrong with my understanding. Can one lockbox hit different GL account for different payment mode like Cash account for Credit Card and Differed Revenue account for ACH?
2. With my assumption from point 1 that I have to create new one for different GL account, I created new lockbox and added lockbox number in transmission format, control file and in data file. After that launched lockbox program for each lockbox number with understanding that each lockbox program will pick up its own payment records based on lockbox nubmer in datafile and process it. But what happened is that first lockbox program processed its own record and also another lockbox number records and finally, its processed its own way of hitting cash account. So again payments hit cash accounts, where my expectation was that each lockbox will pick up its own lockbox number record and hit it to respective GL account i.e. cash and deffered revenue.
Why one lockbox processed another lockbox number records also from same file?
How to achieve this? I dont want to make two seperate data file for each lockbox number, but want to process from one single data file.
Please update me ASAP as I need to freeze the requirement at the earliest.I suggest you to create a Dummy Materials. Lets say,
material number: 1001
enter material description as Domestic
material number: 1002
enter material description as Imports
and in OBYC for GBB
make the following settings:
val grp gen mod val cla gl a/c dr gl a/c cr
0001 VBR 4000 74180040 74180040
0001 VBR 4001 78020091 78020091
so that when u create PO u can get default GL (consumption GL ) for the material (u can use the same for material group also) and u can maintain WRX acc determination as follows ..
val grp val cla gl a/c dr gl a/c cr
0001 4000 123456 123456
0001 4001 456789 456789
Thus u need to create 2 different valuation class for these material group specific and in PO while entering the text u can add the text which is displayed along with material description
hope this helps -
Different Payment advice config for same company code but diff Payment metd
Hi Guys,
Payment advice form is configured in FBZP in the PAYING COMPANY CODES and it is company code level, But I need to use different forms for different payment methods in the same company code, Whether is this possible in the config level or whether any BTE or BADI or User-exit exisist??
regards,
PrabhuHi Radhika,
We have to config a payment methd for a Check and in the path u mentioned we have Check form already,
And we need to config the Payment advice for this check.
So in FBZP - "Paying Company codes" we have configured the Payment advice form which works fine.
Requirement is we need a different Payment advices for this payment methd and this company code has several other Payment methd.
I hope this can be done by modifying the Payment medium program.
regards,
Prabhu -
Understanding of Valuation Basis /001 and /002
What is Valuation Base 001/ and 002/. I can see 82.26 what is 82.26 How it is getting calculated Experts throw some light on this
Valuation basis for an wage type can be determined from PC - 01 - with specifications (0 to 9).
Its is calculation of amount paid per hour.You can divide gross salary with monthly working hours
you will get the value as per your screen shot.
In the screen shot per hour is 82.26 * 10 hrs = 822.60.
If PC 01 with specification is 3 then both will generate same value.
you can use specifications 1 , 2 etc based on requirement.
/002 case: For some employees per hour amount shd not be on gross may be only on 3 wages out of 4 from IT0008 then you can change the PC of that WT with /002.
Hope it helps. -
Hi Expert,
I have a problem in valuation basis. I need to create WT meal 1100 (not dialog / user wage type). And these are the configuration
i generate this WT in schema IDT0 with number = 1.
Amount of WT 1100 is stored in V_T510J (modif = 01).
Valuation base for 1100 are Valuation basis = 'K'
I use standard payroll modifier (XMOD with modif 2 =01)
But the result is amount of WT1100 is still zero. Is there any missing configuration?
Thanks and regards,
airawanHi Airawan,
Regarding V_512W_B,
1. Field vaualtion basis must be [K ], I mean, a K followed by a blank character.
2. Rate must be [100%] or whatever but not 0%.
Regarding debugging, go to trx pe04 operation VALBS then go to the code:
This is the interesting part:
WHEN 'K '.
PERFORM get-modif.
<----
Set the break point here
PERFORM re510j.
ot-betpe = t510j-wert1.
IF fc-sw_dec = 'X'. "XAIP30K051676
ot-rte_curr = calc_currency. "XAIP30K051676
ENDIF. "XAIP30K051676
perform OPVALBS_K_CONVERSION_NATIO "GWY1127319
IN PROGRAM (sy-repid) IF FOUND
USING wpbp calc_currency
CHANGING ot-betpe ot-rte_curr.
Press F8 key until you reach the condition OT-LGART = XXXX, where XXXX is WT to be valuated.
BR,
Carlos.
Edited by: Carlos Martinez Escribano on Aug 17, 2010 9:08 AM -
SAP Note 1438667 - WT for T4A redesign has incorrect valuation bases
Hi,
SAP made changes to the valuation bases in WT /179 through note 1438667, the note aims to create Inflow/Outflow wagetypes /I79 and /O79 for /179 wagetypes instead of the earlier Inflow/Outflow wagetypes /I04 and O04.
For those who have implimented the earlier /179 with wagetypes /I04 and O04, in making this changes how would this impact the old results what do we need to be particular about when unit testing this change.
Thanks.System will not automatically correct the values. So I think what you should do is
1. Run wagetype reporter for the old inflow and outflow wagetype and find out the employees who have them
/O04 & /I04
2. after finding the employees run the T4 and T4A for them and save it.
3. Now run the adjustment payroll in the current week for these employees with forced retro from 01/01/2010. This should correct the wages.
If the simulation run has corrected the data and check their paystubs , there should be any payments to the employees.
4. If so then do a live run.
5.Now compare the t4 and t4As for them.
Do this in unit testing and integration testing -
Different Tax base in pricing procedure for a single sales order for different line item material.
Hi,
I have a scenario wherein in a sales order, for two different material, the tax base of pricing should get triggered on the basis of sold to party and the material entered at line item level.
Logic triggers on the basis of Region of Customer & a unique field in the Material Master but problem comes in the calculation of Tax base as the sequence of condition type (from – to) is already defined in the pricing procedure to pick from a particular step but in second line item the base is different i.e. the sequence of condition types that are maintained in pricing procedure should be different for Tax to calculate differently.
Kindly suggest if the same can be handled in a single pricing procedure and dynamically taking care of condition type sequence through Alt Cal Base Formula, so far I’ve tried both Alt Cal Formula & Base but it is not working
Client doesn’t want to go ahead by creating two different orders (through separate Pricing Procedure) for that. They want to have both materials in same order.
Kindly suggest a suitable way to handle this scenario.
Regards,
Aashika AgarwalHi,
Click on the ''check availability'' button at item overview and then click on ''One-time delivery'' on the top. This will ensure that you will have only one delivery for whatever quantity is confirmed on that date.
If you want to apply this rule for all orders across a sales area, then you can do the below configuration step :
SPRO->sales and distribution->basic functions->availability check with ATP logic->Define default settings-> Here in avail. checking rule select A (one time delivery). This will ensure that all orders created for a particular sales area will have only one delivery.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Palani -
T-codes to get payment run report for different company codes?
Hello sap gurus,
I have a scenario like -
> use of IDocs to process vendor and employee payments. Both bank transfers and checks will be processed through interface.
Now, What is the t-code to get report for payments for different customer, comp codes and vendor?
I am new to SAP in testing.
Appreciate ur help......
Regards,
Shamsher
Edited by: shamsher123 on Jun 4, 2010 11:52 AMHello,
See the List below hope this will help.
MIR5 - Display List of Invoice Documents
S_ALR_87012105 - List of Down Payments Open On Key Date - Vendors
S_ALR_87012085 - Vendor Payment History with OI Sorted List
S_P99_41000099 - Payment List
Prashant Rathore. -
Payment terms for different products from a single vendor
Hi Pundits,
Our client has a requirement to assign different payment terms for different products. Each product he buys from his vendor has it's own payment terms. He wants us to customize in such a way that when he/user enters the invoice, not only the vendor number is shown along with the product name but also the payment terms for that particular product are calculated.
I know that only one payment term can be assigned in the vendor master data. Is there anyway to get around this?
Creating the same vendor multiple times and assign payment terms looks a possible option but that looks quite hectic cause he has close to 1000 payment terms.Taurian, thank you for that suggestion!
I can maintain as many existing payment terms as the client has with his vendors and let him choose the payment terms at the time of invoice entry.
The only problem is that he might have to change it according to the current market rates for that product. So maintaining any payment term is of little use.
Edited by: Dummy_Variable on Aug 16, 2011 8:26 AM -
Payment Terms issue(for different divisions)
Here our business is Distribution...
We take order from customer (SO)....we place order to vendor(our Pricipal vendors we have 7 vendors) (PO) and deliver the goods to customer.....
we treat that different principals as Division...........
For each customer for one div there will be one payment terms.....if i need to have different payment terms for one customer.
what should i do.............
Pls suggest me....Hi,
Please tell me how many sales areas are there.
If there are 7 sales ares then while maintaining price condition records in VK11, you can maintain payment terms while maintaining condition records for the specific sales area.
Check in VK11 by using standard condition type PR00.
You can include sales document type field also and maintian price condition along with payment terms.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sharan
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unable to view the map in Topology
Hi Team, Problem: In the NNMi console i am unable to view the map of container. out of 10 container 9 are working, but 1 is having problem. The error i am getting is " Could not compute the map view response due to exception" Regards, Prashanth
-
How do I upload a CSV file with embedded quotation marks into a table via ETL
I'm having a problem importing a CSV file via ETL that contains double-quotes, and prior solutions aren't helping. My data looks like this: A B114SA CHLORASCRUB SWAB INS SUBASSEMB A S273SA
-
I'm trying a full restore in Lion, but it won't. States that there isn't enough space on the Mac HD. How do I restore everything from a recent Time Machine Backup?
-
Could you please list the situations where I might need to use Java, ABAP or XSLT mapping? Regards, Ashish
-
Double click not working on any folders, photos or anything
When I double (left) click on any folder on my desktop, on on a photo in iphoto, I thought it was supposed to open it but it doesn't do anything. I've already tried to go into Preferences, mouse and seen if there's a way to fix it there, but I don't