Vendor 1099 reprting issue

Hi
When i run the 1099 vendor reprt. It just shows the vendor and his Tax id. How ever when i lcik the line items it doesnt show the witholding tax amout and other deails. I have maintained the tax number nadthe witholding tax code in vendor master. I did check the witholding tax account(fs10n) , where i see the amount
, but not when i run the report. Am i missing something
thanks
sapsri

Sapsri,
What transaction are you using to run this "1099 vendor report" that you mention?
Is it S_PL0_09000314 (program RFW1099M)
If yes, then you can check the following:
- on the selection screen, under the section for "Output Control", you have selected at least "Vendors" and "Payment Document Single Item".
- when you see the output, you must be seeing lots of icons in a bar near the top of the screen. Here's what pressing each of them will mean to you:
-- V_O - List of Vendors with correct TIN
-- V_E - List of Vendors with wrong TIN
-- L_I - Line Items (selected for output)
More icons will appear depending on whether you've chosen to create a file, and asked for it to be displayed on the output screen.
For your primary query, to see line items, press the button that says L_I on it.
Remember to assign points if found useful.
Regards
Gulshan

Similar Messages

1099-MISC issue in ECC6

This is a new ECC6 implementation and first time 1099 reporting from SAP
We are facing two issues with 1099-MISC reporting. I guess these are not unique problems and you might have faced in other projects as well.
1. We have multiple vendor records/numbers for a vendor with same name and tax id but with different addresses. Invoices have also been paid to these different vendor ids. When generating a 1099 report how can we club these Vendor IDs based on Tax ID so that report is generated for only one vendor id. Please note that we are not using an alternative payee feature in this project.
2. This is quite absurd but when we are taking a printout of the 1099-MISC SAPSCRIPT form for 2008 (which was uploaded from SAP Note 1279366), Box no.11 and 12 are not coming proper. These boxes are greyed out or disabled in actual sample IRS copies but in the printout they are almost blank with few small dots here and there as if some text was printed in it and some one tried to erase it. I think IRS may reject these forms. Please revert if anyone else also faced same issue? If yes, what is the solution?

Hi Chandru,
I am still not convinced with your need. You may want to ask your client to check with their tax department. Though I worked on this config few years back but I clearly remember that client need was to club payments of multiple vendor IDs into one vendor ID for 1099 reporting purpose.
However, I am providing configuration path for 1099 Misc report where Fiscal Adress relating settings are to be made. Same place you can make your own settings. Let me know if it helped.
I am copying text from my word doc as I could not attach it. My original docs has screen shots too,
1099 Report Configs:
Field fiscal address in Vendor Master can be used in report configuration. The field that needs to be checked is Group Items according to fiscal address. The path is SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Withholding Tax > Withholding Tax > Generic Withholding Tax Reporting > Define Output Groups
In there go to the settings for US_1099 US1. This is available when you double click that line.
Configs for Reporting
Proposed Changes in Report Configuration:
Group Items according to Fiscal Address Ticker Clubs all the items into one vendor
For Type Adobe- Gives us flexibility to create our own forms in Abobe Forms format. This needs help of ABAP team
DME File- This option allows us to save file in the Unix Directory. By This option we can also run the 1099 report job in the background
Fiscal address can be defined in vendor master under Control where you can attach a central vendor to all other related Vendors
Related Vendors-
Vendors in which actual transactions are carried out. Maintain Central Vendor Number in the Fiscal Address Field.
Central Vendor – This Vendor may or may not be extended to Company Codes. Will propose for better control purpose to not to extend to company code and create a new vendor group. As we only need address and Tax ID. (This is maintained in Fiscal Address)

How to Handle Returns of Vendor Consigned Stock Issued via Delivery ?

Hi.
I am currently able to issue Vendor Consigned Stock via Delivery. I use Lean Warehouse Management, and I have implemented Stock Determination Rule to take Vendor Consigned Stock and Unrestricted own stock in account during Issue. I am even able to insert the correct Vendor Number during the confirmation of the Transfer Order. When I generate the Goods Issue of the Delivery Order, I get an accounting document that affects both the Account Payable Liability and a Consumption Account.
Now My Question is this :
How do I handle Customer Complaints that lead to a Return of the Goods, back into Vendor Consigned Stock ? The goods that is returned, needs to be taken back into Vendor-Consigned Status, and a appropriate Accounting Document needs to be generated to reverse out the Acct Payable Liability and Consumption Account entries.
Do I use a Returns 'RE' Sales Order to bring back the Stock ? I need to be able to create a Return Delivery that will immediately post the returned Stock back into Vendor Consigned Status. So where and how can I key in the vendor number in the Return delivery, keeping in mind Return Delivery in Standard SAP does not use Warehouse Management ?
regards
Peo

Hi Edmund
I think you can try the following:
1. Define a new schedule line category - here you can define the movement type and the item category (as given in a Purchase Info Record). - Transaction VOV6
2. Define a new sales order type for returns. - Transaction VOV8
3. Define a new item category for the returns document, - you can mention the special stock type here too
4. Carry out the sales order to item category and item category to schedule line category assignments.
I am not sure if the system will prompt you to provide the vendor number or how does it populate the vendor no. while posting the material doc. However you can try this out and check if this solves your issue.
Reward points if you find this helpful

Vendor credit memo issue

Hi everyone,
we overpaid vendor PO related invoice, vendor issue us a refund check to us. what we should do in SAP? I use MIRO issue a credit memo ,and post an incoming payment using F-52, but not sure it's the right way.
I guess my question is : If vendor already cashed the check, shall we still use MIRO to issue a creadit memo? how does the accounting work? did PO get reduced?
please advise.
thanks,

Dominic,
I got the answer of difference between Subsequent Debits/Credits and credit memo:
Subsequent Debits/Credits are used in cases where the quantity is in the original invoice is to remain the same. For eg.
PO 10 - $10
Gr 10 - $10
LIV 10 - $11 (Logistics Invoice Verification)
The vendor invoice is more than that in the Purchase Order. In order to correct, the Vendor may send in another invoice for
the Increased amount or a credit memo for the increased amount.
If you approve of the price increase, post the subsequent invoice received as a Subsequent Debit/Credit Invoice.
If it is a credit memo that has been received, then post the credit memo as Subsequent Debit/Credit.
This would retain the quantity but reduce the amount.
Subsequent Debit/Credit is for the case when the credit is not for the full amount eg. if the Vendor decided to credit
only the $1 overcharged.
Credit memo is for the credit of the full amount and value.

Vendor Open item issue - legacy load

Hi Gurus
I need your help on an issue related to venddor open items. We migrated the vendor open items from legacy system to ECC. Now we have realized that for few vendors, we had made payments by wire just before doing the legacy load. Now these items are showing as open items for these vendors in ECC though the payment was already made before we went live. As it is constantly showing as liability, we need to close these items.
Can you please advise me how can we close these items without making double payment?
I appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Shalu

Hi
1) reverse the entries for those invoices, so the entry will be,
Vendor Dr
To AP load A/c Cr
2) Then Pass the entry in the GL balance for the same amount,
AP load A/c Dr
To GL load A/c Cr
3) Update the GL balances where the payment got posted in old system
GL load A/c Dr
To GL A/c (mapped to Old system) Cr
Follow the above steps, if you want to repeat the Data migration steps or else simply clear the invoices in the new system.
Regards
Nikhil

Vendor number range issue in BUCF transaction

Hi,
We are implementing the SRM 5.0 with Extended Classic scenario. I my current SRM system is already connected with 3 SAP R/3 system and I am implementing and adding 4th SAP R/3 system.
I am having an issue to replicating the vendor master from 4th R/3 system to our SRM system due to wrong number ranges in BUCF transaction code.
Current Number Range in SRM systems are:-
01     0010000000            0014999999     10003009
AB     0001000000        0009999999                        X     --> (7 Digits)
My new vendor master from 4th R/3 system is:-
0080000001        to     0080029999    --> (8 Digits)
My new vendor master number range is overlapping with my internal number range 01. As we know that we cannot reduce the lower range of 01 from 0010000000 to 0000000001. Also I cannot increase the number AB higher value from 0009999999 to 0099999999.
Can you any one please suggest me to correct the number range?
Thanks,
Senthil

Hello Senthill,
The vendor replication to external number ranges works as follows:-
(1) Cross-Application Components SAP Business Partner > Business Partne
> Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Number Ranges
Here you sould define an external number range which corresponds to
the R/3 numbers. You may want to have more than one external range
in order to replicate all vendors.
(2) Cross-Application Components > SAP Business Partner > Business Part
> Basic Settings > Number Ranges and Groupings > Define Groupings and
Assign Number Ranges
For each replication run, you can download the vendors which correspond
to the external number range / grouping which is marked as 'standard
external'.
So, you will have to replicate your vendors separately for each number
range:-
Select the correct grouping each time by marking 'Ext.Std Grping'
and then run BBPGETVD for the vendors to be assigned to this grouping.
As standard, the customized settings for the number ranges
would have to be changed for each run of BBPGETVD and BBP_VENDOR_SYNC.
If you run the update or synchronization in combination with a
BADI the intervals could be taken into account.
The BADI is BBP_TRANSDATA_PREP
The methods are:-
Method: PREPARE_REPLICATION_DATA (intitial download)
Method: PREPARE_UPDATE_DATA (update)
Import data is stored in CT_LFA1 should be copied to an
internal table. There the required intervals can be determined.
This BADI is not assigned in the IMG but can be seen through SE18.
I hope this information is helpful.
Kind Regards,
Edel.

QM Vendor Analysis Reports Issue

Dear all,
I have a problem in QM Vendor Analysis Report.
My system is using inspection lot origin 05 Other Goods Receipt for some inspection types used for manual inspection lot. However the inspection types of inspection lot origin 05 cannot be show in the all QM Vendor Analysis Reports (e.g. MCVA. MCV1), while the reports for material analysis can show all inspection types. Now only inspection types of inspection lot origin 01 can be show in the Vendor Analysis Reports.
Can anyone please help..
Thank you.

Hi,
Thanks for you reply.
I think may be the design want to make the the manual inspection lots difference from the system generated inspection lots, and the number range can also be different.
The system is already in used and there are inspection lots created. Is there any ways to solve this issue?
Thank you.

Vendor change name issue

I have a problem, we have a vendor named vendorA. In one day, vendorA changed their name to vendorB. Then my colleague change the name on vendor master. I would like to know it is better create a new vendor code or modify the exist one? Since we still issue PO after changed the vendor name, that means all PO related to this vendor, including new name and old name. If i create a new vendor code for new name, is it possible to transfer the to new vendor code, credit old vendor code, debit new vendor code. Thanks!

Hii,
Do not change Name of the exesting vendor into new name , it is better to create a new vendor code unless it will be difficult for you to scrutiny of vendor data.
Create a new vendor code & then find out the data which needs to be booked in new vendor code.
For this , you have to pass two seprate entires by using intermidiary account
For Eg.
if old vendor having credit balance
Old Vendor a/c   Dr.
     to Intermidiary a/c
& then
Intermidairy a/c   Dr
     to New Vendor a/c
Note : In both the entried you have to use one common profit center
Regards,
Umesh

Cancel Vendor Consigment Goods Issue document

We are in the process of implementing Vendor Consignment and are unsure about one piece of the process. This is the scenario:
a) end user draws 2 parts out of Consigned stock
b) MRKO will create a liability to the vendor
c) end user only needed one part so he returns 1 to Consigned stock via MBST
d) both parts are reversed, MRKO settlement is fully reversed
e) we have to re-issue one in order to restore the correct liability to the vendor
Has anyone been able to come up with a smoother process to manage returns to Stores?

Hello Jurgen,
We use mvt type 261 to issue out against the reservation. We are now in ECC and have re-tested this process and it now works as expected using mvt type 262... the settlement performed via MRKO now recognizes that something has been put back into consignment and posts a reversal in FI. This did not work when we tested in 4.6c, but it works fine in ECC.
Thanks again for your feedback,
Linda

Return vendor sales area issue

Hi all,
I am creating return vendor master in Xk01 in purchase data view i am seleting a return vendor tab, its take me customer default data screen wher i am giving customer account group XXXX and shipping condition as 01 and i save the vendor master its create vendor number in bagroung its create cusomer master number
How the ssytem is taking sales area to create a customer master where we need to define that config and i have one more issue while saving return vendor itscreate customer but its assiging two sales area let say zzzz/01/01 and zzzz/01/01
can any one guide me where is the issue
Thanks
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh ,
What is return Vendor?
As per my undetstanding , when you are doing returns the sales area determined automatically from customer master?
Note-Vendor can also customer OR Customer also can be Vendor , here there is link between these two ,once you assign that vendor in Customer master general data-Control data - you have field you can assign that vendor code there, the same with vendor you can also link customer with Vendor in the same assignment in vendor master data
May be this assign is done already for that customer or vendor plz check.
Hope it is helpful to you
Regards
Venkat

Vendor - 1099 Misc.

Hi,
Can someone please walk me through how to config / set up and print 1099 MISC forms for vendors.
Thanks

Go through these links for
Withholding Tax http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/9e/7e673756772b7fe10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Withholding Tax Data in the Vendor Master Record
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/ea/896737fb6e947ee10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Generic Withholding Tax Reporting
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/8d/0da93c74d1365fe10000000a114084/content.htm

1099 reporting issue

We created a KR document in 2006. The check was cut in 2006. A 1099 was generated and sent to the recipient. But, in February 2007, the check was voided and other check was cut (dated February 2007).
Now, the numbers are off between invoices and payments for 2006. We still need to send the file to the IRS. How do we go about changing the data so that the IRS file matches with what we did in 2006?
What is the correct procedure for a situation like this? Should the original KR be changed so that the reporting will actually take place in 2007, not 2006, since the check was not received until 2007?

Dealt with OSS on this issue.

Vendor Consignment Price Issue for short term Price Contracts with Vendors

Hi Gurus, We are using Consignment Process successfully but very recently we faced a problem on some of our vendors who change the price every quarter.e.g. when the Buyer cuts the Consignment PO for 1000 pieces and receive it in K stock for 10$ the price is valid for 3 months in the Info record when we start moving from K stock to Company stock after 3 months the price is changing in info record and consumption happening after 3 Months is causing issues as you all know there is NO PO history tracking for Consignment PO's except 101k movement.we could manually do the jugglery by NOT changing the Info record untill the full 1000 qty of the PO is received but the problem is if there are multiple PO's and if the consumption is pulling stock from 2 different PO's then we have issues
E.g. PO1 1000 Qty Info rec validity May 1st to july 31st 10$ per piece
PO2 500 Qty Info Rec Validity Aug 1st to Oct 31st 12$ per piece
First consumption 411k for 800 Pcs on june 25th happens with 10 $
Second consumption 411k for 600 Pcs happen on Sep10th will happen with 12$ but the vendor wants 200 out of 600 with 10$ and 400 with 12$ how do we handle this situation without manually changing the info record please advise
As Consumption and settlement happens in MRKO which is totally unlinked with the PO. Is there a way we can handle the situation. There could be multiple consignment PO's which bring stock in Consignment

Hi DP,
As SAP doesn't Support Delivery cost settlement with the consignment process to seprate G/L ( Similar to accruals ), you need to go for Z development which while posting MRKO will be executed with refernce to PO & Issue Document Posting the freight Value to Appropriate fright G/L .
Regards
Manish
Edited by: Manish Kumar on Nov 3, 2010 12:06 PM

Vendor Down Payment issue

Dear Expert
While doing F-48 Vendor Down Payment am getting below Error
Customer 450822 is not defined in company code 1000
Message no. F5102
Diagnosis
No master record was created in company code "1000" for customer number "450822".
System Response
System error.
Procedure
Maintain the customer master record "450822" in company code "1000" or correct the account number.
Regards
Ajeesh.s

Hi ,
Instead of typed Vendor number can you please do F4 and then look for vendor in Comapny code 1000 . I know its sound bit strange but I would like to check this .
Can you Please check in OBYR for Special GL indictor A and check the reconciliation account for your Chart of account . It may be posible that you have assigned customer reconciliation instead of vendor

Vendor Open item issue - Functional area wise

Hi Gurus,
We want to create Vendor Open item report using SQVI / report painter - Functional area wise, we are creating the report using BSIK table, but it is showing the credit amount coming as +ve. We are not able extract the net amount, as it is not reconcile with FBL1N open balances.
Please help me with your inputs with steps / procedures to design the report in SQVI, if there is no possibility, please let me know if there is any Std Report Group to achieve this functionality.
Regards
Naveen

Hi Naveen,
I would suggest you to follow following threads from Mr. Jogeswara Rao Kavala on Query reports:
Calling Reports from an Infoset Query
Infoset Query: User Defined Fields
10 Useful Tips on Infoset Queries
Alias Tables in Infosets and QuickViews
Infoset Query: Display message in Status bar
Regards
Saurabh

Vendor 1099 reprting issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for