1099 reporting issue

We created a KR document in 2006.  The check was cut in 2006.  A 1099 was generated and sent to the recipient. But, in February 2007, the check was voided and other check was cut (dated February 2007).
Now, the numbers are off between invoices and payments for 2006.  We still need to send the file to the IRS.  How do we go about changing the data so that the IRS file matches with what we did in 2006?
What is the correct procedure for a situation like this?  Should the original KR be changed so that the reporting will actually take place in 2007, not 2006, since the check was not received until 2007?

Dealt with OSS on this issue.

Similar Messages

  • Urgent!!! 1099 vendor reporting issues.

    Hi SAP Gurus,
      I have few issues on 1099 reporting I wonder if anyone could help address these below issues.
    1. I did all the configuration for 1099 reporting on vendor master and I am running RFW1099M and RFIDYYWT programs to see the cleared vendor line items but I can see only few vendors cleared line items and the other vendors items are not getting displayed. I double checked the vendor master the settings are exactly the same except WH tax codes.
    2. The 1099 Minimum amounts on the RFW1099M program doesn't seem to work coz it displays all the items which are less than the 1099 Minimum amounts mentioned in the selection screen for example it was mentioned $600 on selection screen of the Minimum amounts field now it displays items which are less than $600.
    3. There are 9 specific Return types (Business specific) along with WH Tax codes and the  combination of both leads to 1099 minimum amounts. How to achieve this requirement? for example see below.
    Return,Type         WH Tax code                            Description                                             1099 Minimum
      1                                1                                   Gross Dividends on Stock                                        10
      1                                7                                    Cash liquidation distributions                                  600
      3                                6                                    Mortgage interest received                                      600
      6                                1                                     Earnings from S&L, cr unions                                    10
    Kind Regards,
    Bob

    Hi Bob,
    I am not sure whether its a Basis question. However, I found a similar forum with same issue. Please refer to below link
    Report 1099 program(RFW1099M) issue
    1099 report- program RFTW0010/RFTW0020
    1099 vendors, S_PL0_09000314 - 1099-Misc
    Regards,
    Arjun

  • 1099 report- program RFTW0010/RFTW0020

    Hello All
    I am facing some issues with the 1099 reporting. We have many vendors that were setup incorrectly as 1099 vendors. A lot of documents have been posted to them. I deleted the withholding tax information and ran the correction program RFTW0010 and then ran the 1099 report S_P00_07000134 - Generic Withholding Tax Reporting  but this report still shows all the documents already posted.
    Looks like the only way for me to fix this, is to go and remove the withholding tax information from each line. This is not possible. Is there a solution for this? what is the use of these programs? they only update the with WITH_TAX tables and fix a vendor going forward right?
    Does SAP not have a solution for this?
    When do I run  the program RFTW0010 vs RFTW0020.

    Hi,
    The 2 reports mentioned by you viz., RFTW0010/RFTW0020 are to be used when you are changing the vendor master and then wants to correct the line items posted to be in sink with the changed vendor master. 
    I guess, in your instant case also, the report RFTW0020 is relevant, is you have changed the code and report RFTW0010 is relevant is you have changed the WT Type.
    Hope this helps.
    Vikas.

  • 1099-MISC issue in ECC6

    This is a new ECC6 implementation and first time 1099 reporting from SAP
    We are facing two issues with 1099-MISC reporting. I guess these are not unique problems and you might have faced in other projects as well.
    1. We have multiple vendor records/numbers for a vendor with same name and tax id but with different addresses. Invoices have also been paid to these different vendor ids. When generating a 1099 report how can we club these Vendor IDs based on Tax ID so that report is generated for only one vendor id. Please note that we are not using an alternative payee feature in this project.
    2. This is quite absurd but when we are taking a printout of the 1099-MISC SAPSCRIPT form for 2008 (which was uploaded from SAP Note 1279366), Box no.11 and 12 are not coming proper. These boxes are greyed out or disabled in actual sample IRS copies but in the printout they are almost blank with few small dots here and there as if some text was printed in it and some one tried to erase it. I think IRS may reject these forms. Please revert if anyone else also faced same issue? If yes, what is the solution?

    Hi Chandru,
    I am still not convinced with your need. You may want to ask your client to check with their tax department. Though I worked on this config few years back but I clearly remember that client need was to club payments of multiple vendor IDs into one vendor ID for 1099 reporting purpose.
    However, I am providing configuration path for 1099 Misc report where Fiscal Adress relating settings are to be made. Same place you can make your own settings. Let me know if it helped.
    I am copying text from my word doc as I could not attach it. My original docs has screen shots too,
    1099 Report Configs:
    Field fiscal address in Vendor Master can be used in report configuration. The field that needs to be checked is Group Items according to fiscal address. The path is SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Withholding Tax >  Withholding Tax > Generic Withholding Tax Reporting > Define Output Groups
    In there go to the settings for US_1099 US1. This is available when you double click that line.
    Configs for Reporting
    Proposed Changes in Report Configuration:
    Group Items according to Fiscal Address Ticker Clubs all the items into one vendor
    For Type Adobe- Gives us flexibility to create our own forms in Abobe Forms format. This needs help of ABAP team
    DME File- This option allows us to save file in the Unix Directory. By This option we can also run the 1099 report job in the background
    Fiscal address can be defined in vendor master under Control where you can attach a central vendor to all other related Vendors
    Related Vendors-
    Vendors in which actual transactions are carried out. Maintain Central Vendor Number in the Fiscal Address Field.
    Central Vendor – This Vendor may or may not be extended to Company Codes. Will propose for better control purpose to not to extend to company code and create a new vendor group. As we only need address and Tax ID. (This is maintained in Fiscal Address)

  • 1099 Reporting doubts

    Hi all,
    I am doing 1099 coniguration for an US Company. I have the following doubts. Pl help me with your inputs.
    1. What is to be taken as reporting base for 1099 - Invoice or payment (withholding tax type for invoice posting or payment posting)
    2. How will the Vendor who gives tax exemption certificate be reflected in the Report.
    Thanks
    Sri.

    Hi,
    To flag a vendor in SAP as a 1099 vendor, two fields need to be populated.
    1. On the Control screen of the vendor master, populate either "Tax Code 1" field with his social security number if his social security number is his tax id. or "Tax Code 2" field with his corporate tax id. if he has been issued a corporate tax id. Input either of the two in their correct format i.e. social security as xxx-xx-xxxx or corporate id as xx-xxxxxxx.
    2. On the Accounting Info. screen, populate the "W.tax code" field under the "Withholding Tax" box with the value "07" if it is a US vendor or "42" if it is a foreign vendor.
    These are the two fields that specify a vendor as being a 1099 vendor.
    Any posts done before this changes were implemented will not show on 1099.
    You will need to run program RFWT0020 to flag 1099 items retroactively.
    ...and/or you can change the "Document Change rules" for BSEG-QSSHB and BESG-QSSKZ for account type "K" so that you can change the Withholding tax code after the line item has been cleared (i.e. after entering the required information in the vendor master record as the user above has recommended) (Refer to OSS Note: 363650).
    But if you use MIRO to post invoices, you might want to look at Note 482245 too...
    In SAP v40b, the new 1099 report is RFW1099M. It is a neat report since it merges all the three reports that are listed in the AP info system under the withholding tax.
    Regards,
    Satish Muvva.

  • Duplicate invoices in 1099 report

    Hello All
    When I run the S_P00_07000134 - Generic Withholding Tax Reporting  report I am seeing invoices show up twice for a vendor. This vendor had its tax region code changed from IL to NY and now I see the amounts showing up once under IL and again under NY which is making my total double.
    Did anyone face this issue? How do I fix it? I already ran the correction program

    Hi,
    Vendor address and withholding tax code should be maintained as per the nature of the vendor. 1099 Vendors will be classified based on Vendor Master containing fields (Tax Number 1 or 2 and Withholding Tax Code). In US a taxpayer identification number (TIN) uniquely identifies recipients whose income is connected with a trade or business. In this context please note that if the business does not know the TIN of the vendor then they can request it from the IRS (internal Revenue Services which is a regulatory body ) using form W-9, Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. With this form, the vendor also certifies to the company that the number furnished is correct. The taxpayer identification number is a social security number (SSN) and is filled up in Tax number 1 field of Account control screen of vendor master if the vendor concerned is an individual, and an employer identification number (EIN) for corporate in all other cases and is filled up in Tax number 2 field of account control screen of vendor master.
    Now the question remains which all vendors actually qualify under 1099 category? Generally that would be a vendor of goods and /or services that is not incorporated (such as a landlord, independent contractor) to whom your business has made payments greater than $600 (total, for the applicable tax year). In addition, gross proceeds to attorneys and cash payments for fish and fishing boat proceeds and some other specified categories of payments are reportable. If your vendor is a 1099 vendor you have to issue them (and report to the IRS) a separate 1099 slip. It applies primarily to vendors who provide "services" and excludes corporations, unless the service provided is for medical or health care services or attorneys fees. Vendors who are service providers and are not incorporated should therefore indicate that they are 1099 vendors and provide the requested information. The sole purpose of this 1099 reporting is to ensure that the IRS gets income information from an independent contractor and they do not evade paying taxes. The IRS is apparently tracking certain business transactions as well, such as gross attorney proceeds and payments for fish and fishing boat proceeds.

  • RFIDYYWT / 1099 reporting / include doc type AB?

    We are preparing to use SAP's 1099 Misc reporting functionality for the 2011 tax year, and have managed to resolve most issues. However, we can't figure out how to get miscellaneous journal entries (doc type AB) included in the reporting. I've confirmed that the line items in BSEG have the appropriate withholding tax code (07), but when I run RFIDYYWT, the 'AB' documents aren't being included.
    Can/should AB documents be included in 1099 reporting? And if so, what do we need to do to ensure that they get pulled in?
    Thanks in advance!
    Allison

    Hello Allison,
    Please review the following documentation on the field reporting period.
    Field ; Reporting period
    Posting date in the document
    Date which is used when entering the document in Financial Accounting
    or Controlling.
    Use
    The fiscal year and the period for which an update of the accounts
    specified in the document or cost elements is made, are derived
    from the posting date.
    When entering documents, the system checks whether the posting date
    entered is allowed by means of the posting period permitted.
    Note
    The posting date can differ from both the entry date (day of entry
    into the system) and the document date
    (day of creation of the original document).
    The selection criterion in RFIDYYWT is the posting date
    (not the clearing date).This is entered in the 'reporting period' field.
    Consider the following example:
    -invoice document posted in 2004 -payment document posted in 2005
    1. if you select period 20010, only the invoice will be reported
    2. if you select period 2011, only the payment will be reported
    This may cause confusio if the calculation of the w/h tax does not occur
    within the posting period selected (the calculation of w/h tax depends
    on your settings: it could be w/h tax at time of invoice or at time of
    payment).
    Please, understand that mainly based on the selection criteria and
    the output defined the document will be selected or not.
    Currently, documents are getting selected based on the reporting date.
    The reporting date is the posting date in the document, that means, the
    date which is used when entering the document in financial accounting
    and the withholding tax amount is posted.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards
    RAY

  • 1099 Reporting

    How to configure backup withholding in SAP for 1099 reporting ?
    There are IRS requirements to withhold @ 28% in case of TIN Mismatch , after 30 days of sending firs B-notice etc.
    I would also like to know where can we find detais on what all tax codes to be cofigured for different US States.

    Dear,
    In order to use 1099 MISC reporting is something that needs to be configured or set up in the vendor master records? I am trying to run the report and I don't get anything. 
    To flag a vendor in SAP as a 1099 vendor, two fields need to be populated. 
    1. On the Control screen of the vendor master, populate either "Tax Code 1" field with his social security number if his social security number is his tax id. or "Tax Code 2" field with his corporate tax id. if he has been issued a corporate tax id. Input either of the two in their correct format i.e. social security as xxx-xx-xxxx or corporate id as xx-xxxxxxx. 
    2. On the Accounting Info. screen, populate the "W.tax code" field under the "Withholding Tax" box with the value "07" if it is a US vendor or "42" if it is a foreign vendor. 
    These are the two fields that specify a vendor as being a 1099 vendor. 
    Any posts done before this changes were implemented will not show on 1099. 
    You will need to run program RFWT0020 to flag 1099 items retroactively. 
    ...and/or you can change the "Document Change rules" for BSEG-QSSHB and BESG-QSSKZ for account type "K" so that you can change the Withholding tax code after the line item has been cleared (i.e. after entering the required information in the vendor master record as the user above has recommended) (Refer to OSS Note: 363650). 
    But if you use MIRO to post invoices, you might want to look at Note 482245 too...
    regards

  • K records not being created on IRS file for 1099 reporting

    My company went live on SAP in July 2008. 2010 will be our 3rd year to do 1099 reporting. When we generate the IRS file, we are not getting any K records.
    Does anyone know what could be the problem?
    Thanks
    Alicia

    Hi Alicia
    We had the same issue & we referred to FAQ.pdf file in OSS note 1546868 where it asks us to add 'DELAY' to 'Atom handling' field in DMEE tcode for tree WTRE. 
    But the issue is that it created only 1 K record for the whole 1099 file but it should have created one K record per state.  So we are still trying to get that taken care of somehow.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Morgan

  • Stage Analysis Report Issue

    Hi,
    I have run a stage analysis report but it says no data inspite of open opportunities being present in the system. Could anyone kindly let me know what could be the issue?
    Regards
    Sharat

    Hi Sharat,
    Welcome you to the forum. Please close your first thread.
    Regarding your Stage Analysis Report Issue, what selection has been made? This report show closed opportunity only.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Vendor tax id change impacting 1099 reporting

    Hi
    Our business creates new vendors when there is a tax id change for the same vendor because they want the 1099 report to provide the tax id number associated with a certain payment document in 1099 report.
    This causes duplicate vendor numbers to be created for the SAME vendor. They truly do not want to be creating duplicate vendors and so
    would like to know how they can get 1099 report to provide the tax ids associated with a certain payment.
    How do the other companies handle this? What do you do when a certain vendor has had a TAX ID change?
    Thanks
    Depa

    Ok, I Found it. We have to customize it. Taxes are reported at Operating Unit level only.

  • GR/IR GL Reporting Issue

    1. 30 documents of 2009 were matching and post with clear is perfomred. After performing post with clear also the line items are not moving from open line items. When we download the open line items as of today, these line items are appearing.
    2. When we download the ZBLRFIOI report for GRIR a/c 349100 to have the opne line items. we have some set of documents showing as " FI Open items without J2" - This is reporting issues.
    Thanks
    Mallikarjuna

    Hi
    Pls try with F.13 for that GR/IR account 349100 by selecting check box select gl accounts
    And give Company code, year and pending document numbers in selection screen
    And before that pls make sure that OB74 clearing settings maintained or not
    It will clear all the open items exists
    Reg
    Vishnu

  • BW Reporting Issue

    Hi,
    I am facing one reporting Issue relating to Display Attributes.
    Characteristic: Business Partner
    Display Attributes: Address0, Address1, Address3...etc.
    Requirement is to display mentioned Display attributes along with Business Partner.
    For this I have selected Business Partner as characteristic and mentioned above three as display attributes to Business Partner.
    But Query out put is not showing Display attributes. For this I have done all settings at reporting level, all gone vain.
    I am using Bex 7.0.
    Kindly look in to the Issue and let me know the solution.
    Regards,
    Venkat.Mahipathi.
    09886652422.
    [email protected]

    Hi,
    Check in Reporting properties or check attributes in analyzer proprties then it will display  
    ************asign points if usefull***********
    swapna

  • 1099 Reporting for Multiple Operating Units using same Tax Id Number

    Everyone!!!!
    We have multiple operating units using the same tax id number. We need to use the 1099 standard reports. I see that in the 1099 standard programs, one of the necessary parameters is Tax Entity Id which is again at operating unit level.
    As 1099 reports need to be sent at the Tax Id Number not at operating unit level, is there any way to use the starndard program and do this, or will we have to customize it?
    We are on 11.5.10.2 if it matters. Let me know if you need more information.

    Ok, I Found it. We have to customize it. Taxes are reported at Operating Unit level only.

  • 1099 Report for OTV - Classic Withholding Tax

    Hello Members,
    We run on SAP ERP 6.0 EHP6 and use the classic withholding tax functionality.
    Wondering what the rest of the world with classic setup is using for 1099-MISC reporting for one time vendors ?
    Currently we follow a cumbersome process of pulling FBL1N report (which doesn't have otv address information), and then FCHN to get vendor address details. With this we change a vendor and update the master data and payment document withholding information in QAS to print the paper form from QAS.
    I read a few of the forums and the idea I get is, if the vendor is to be 1099 reported, it should be a standard vendor.
    Questions:
    1) Any standard functionality available within classic setup for 1099 MISC reporting of OTV ?
    2) Does using extended functionality make OTV reporting any better
    3) Any best practices that you are following which you think is better than ours ?
    Regards,
    Ani

    Hi,
    See SAP Note-802033
    Raj

Maybe you are looking for

  • Setting Up Second Display - ADC to DVi - DVI to HDMi to Widescreen TV

    Trying to set up the widescreen TV as a second monitor for visitors. Here's the info: ATI Radeon 7500: Chipset Model: ATY,RV200 Type: Display Bus: AGP Slot: SLOT-1 VRAM (Total): 32 MB Vendor: ATI (0x1002) Device ID: 0x5157 Revision ID: 0x0000 ROM Rev

  • I have an iPod touch 4th generation and I can't upgrade to iOS 6.1.3 (or to any editions)

    I have an iPod touch 4th generation running iOS 6.1, and my grandma's iPhone 4 could upgrade, so I thought I'd try it out on my iPod. I go to software update u set my system settings, and it doesn't do anything! It just stays still and says "Checking

  • Bash_completion

    Hi archer since the last update bash_completion doesnt work anymore in the .bashrc  i have if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ]; then . /etc/bash_completion fi wenn i type pacman -S firefox- and press TAB, nothings happens any ideas?

  • [SOLVED] is it possible to use Super by itself as the prefix key?

    Hi, just got through my first arch installation and I'm setting up StumpWM. I've been trying to set the super key as the sole prefix key, without success so far. edit: this is what I've tried: //in shell xmodmap -e 'keycode 133 = F20' //in stumpwm ev

  • SRM, BBP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED Auto grouping by Plant

    Hi, We have a requirement to add Plant as a grouping criteria in program BBP_SC_TRANSFER_GROUPED to combine requisition in SRM system. The standard logic only does the grouping based on Vendor and Purchasing group. Do you know any solution to the abo