Vendor Amount Checking and posting

Hi Friends,
    Here ,I am using this function module for checking the vendor amount. BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_CHECK
I am passing below data
Header Data
OBJ_SYS     C     10
BUS_ACT     C     4      RFBU
USERNAME     C     12      ABAP16
HEADER_TXT     C     25
COMP_CODE     C     4      H
DOC_DATE     D     8      20060217
PSTNG_DATE     D     8      20060217
TRANS_DATE     D     8      00000000
FISC_YEAR     N     4      2006
FIS_PERIOD     N     2      00
DOC_TYPE     C     2      SA
REF_DOC_NO     C     16      TEST
ACCOUNT GL
0000000001|0002110113|
ACCOUNT PAYBLE
ITEMNO_ACC     N     10      0000000002
VENDOR_NO     C     10      EPAY1
SECTIONCODE     C     4      B004
ACCOUNT TAX
ITEMNO_ACC     N     10      0000000001
GL_ACCOUNT     C     10      0001430524
COND_KEY     C     4      JIN2
ACCT_KEY     C     3      MW3
TAX_CODE     C     2      AR
TAX_RATE     P     4         0.000
TAX_DATE     D     8      00000000
TAXJURCODE     C     15
TAXJURCODE_DEEP     C     15
TAXJURCODE_LEVEL     C     1
ITEMNO_TAX     N     6      000000
ITEMNO_ACC     N     10      0000000002
GL_ACCOUNT     C     10      0001430524
COND_KEY     C     4      JIN6
ACCT_KEY     C     3      JN6
TAX_CODE     C     2      AR
TAX_RATE     P     4         4.000
TAX_DATE     D     8      00000000
TAXJURCODE     C     15
TAXJURCODE_DEEP     C     15
TAXJURCODE_LEVEL     C     1
ITEMNO_TAX     N     6      000000
CURRENCY AMOUNT
ITEMNO_ACC     N     10      0000000002
CURR_TYPE     C     2
CURRENCY     C     5      INR
CURRENCY_ISO     C     3
AMT_DOCCUR     P     12                        753.85-
EXCH_RATE     P     5         0.00000
EXCH_RATE_V     P     5         0.00000
AMT_BASE     P     12                        756.00
DISC_BASE     P     12                        0.0000
DISC_AMT     P     12                        0.0000
ITEMNO_ACC     N     10      0000000001
CURR_TYPE     C     2
CURRENCY     C     5      INR
CURRENCY_ISO     C     3
AMT_DOCCUR     P     12                        753.8500
EXCH_RATE     P     5         0.00000
EXCH_RATE_V     P     5         0.00000
AMT_BASE     P     12                        0.0000
DISC_BASE     P     12                        756.0000
DISC_AMT     P     12                        0.0000
cretir
0000000001|BUKRS                         |H                               |
0000000001|KNDNR                         |ICIEL                           |
0000000001|ARTNR                         |DDTEST-OWN                      |
0000000001|VKORG                         |HLL                             |
0000000001|VTWEG                         |ST                              |
account tax
0000000001|0001430524|JIN2    |MW3     |AR      |   0.000 |00000000       |
0000000002|0001430524|JIN6    |JN6     |AR      |   4.000 |00000000       |
I am getting error Balance in transation currency.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana Rao.

Hi Rob,
I'm having a similar problem to this issue, in my currencyamount table the balance amounts to Zero, which mean the document is ready to post. but i get this error 'balance in transaction curcy'.
Any idea what could be my mistake?
Thanks in advance.
Vinod

Similar Messages

Diff between Item Amount Check and Stochastic Block

Hi,
what's the diff between Item Amount Check and Stochastic Block in LIV??

Item Amount Check
The system calculates the sum of the value invoiced so far for the
order item and the value of the current invoice and compares it with
the value limit of the purchase order. It then compares the
difference with the upper percentage and absolute tolerances
defined.
Stochastic Block
You can block all invoices to check them again through Stochastic block automatically. If the stochastic block is active and you post an invoice that is not subject to any other blocking reason, it can be selected for blocking.
Please make a note that- A stochastic block is not set at item level, but for the whole invoice. If a stochastic block is set when you post the invoice, the system automatically sets an R in the field Payment block in the document header data; there is no blocking indicator in the individual items.
In Customizing for Invoice Verification, you can define:
-If stochastic blocking is active
-The degree of probability of a block. You set a threshold value and a percentage for this.
If you enter a threshold value of zero and a percentage of 99.9%, all invoices would then be blocked automatically.

Amount check tolerances

Hello
Why SAP has provided two settings for price variances
1. One at OMR6
2. In the same tree path, ITEM AMOUNT CHECK
When we use item amount check and when we use OMR6 ???
Please give exmaple if possible.
Thanks & Regards

Hi
Item amount check - U can define a particular amount in the customising. if ant invoice coming over and above the amount, the invoice will get blocked automatically.
Tolerance - Can be of AN, AP,BD, BR, BW,DQ, DW, KW,PP,PS, ST,VP
These are mainatianed at the company cod elevel, based on the limitis it will allow or block the invoice.
Regards,
Raman

Check Amount is clearing and posting to same Bank Sub A/c In FCHR

Hi,
Can any one explain the reason for the below issue in my Bank Accounting?
when check is cleared using FCHR, Check Amount is not moving From Bank Sub A/c (Checks Issued A/c ) to Bank Main A/c.
Check Amount is clearing and posting to same Bank Sub A/c. I have checked all the setings are fine (Posting Rules also fine).
Thanks
Chandra

Hi Chandra,
Thats right. You would anyways do a bank recon at which point these are moved into the bank main account.
Caio
Raghu

Calculation and posting of discount on Payment and on net amount

Hello,
My client would like to configure posting of discount on payment. The discount should be calculated on the net amount and should also adjust the VAT input tax amount. Example:
PO: 100 EUR, VAT 10 EUR, Gross amt = 110 EUR, Invoice recieved: 110 (-110 on vendor,100 is posted on GR/IR and 10 on input tax). When payment is done, discount amounts to 2.2 EUR ( 110 is posted on vendor account, -107.8 on bank account, -2 on discount account, -0.2 in input tax).
Have anyone of you ever did this on SAP. Can you pleas explain me the steps if yes? Thank you for your help.

Hi,
I have already did a test with base discount on net amount and base vat on net amount check. When those are check, during good receipt the purchase account is debit with the net amount (gross -discount) and during invoice the difference is then transferred to the purchase account. The tax is calculated on the net amount. This is not what we are looking for. For us we want to know if it is possible that during good receipt and invoice received everything is calculated without taking into consideration the discount received. It is only when we are doing the payment of the invoice that discount is calculated and the VAT amount is adjusted for with the discount received. Thank you for your help.

Hi please forword this massage I have a problem whith paid registration When i did check and bought 2 ringtones i paid her Yesterday but amount taken off my card and i do not know why If you have a subscrition to someting please delete ann just qhe

Hi please forword this massage
I have a problem whith paid registration
When i did check and bought 2 ringtones i paid her
Yesterday but amount taken off my card and i do not know why
If you have a subscrition to someting please delete ann just qhen i dicide to buy someting then i take maney
Sent from my iPhone

Please repost in your native language, as your present post makes no sense.

Paying a vendor with Credit Card instead of check and specifying so in Orac

Hello,
We are going to start paying some of our vendors in Accounts Payable via American Express credit card instead of generating a check. What is the best way to reflect this in Oracle? Now, we pay via check and it is specified in the AP records. Instead, we want to pay via CC and specify that we did so in the AP record.

Would you maybe be getting a credit card transaction data file format from American Express? Oracle does provide a loader program for the American Express KR-1025 format. After you load the credit card transaction data, then you validate the data. Once validated, employees can enter these credit card transactions on expenrse reports. Though this does not sound like an expense report situation, so perhaps this won't work out for you. So another possibility would be to handle this like a manual payment process. As mentioned in another post, you could look at another payment document type. So you have some choices here. Make sense?
John Dickey

HT3702 My bank was charge me the following amount of USD 1. But i do not have any purchase of USD1. Please check and refund.

My bank was charged me the following amount of USD 1. But i do not have any purchase of USD1. Please check and refund.

We are fellow users here on these user-to-user forums, you're not talking to iTunes Support nor Apple.
The HT3702 page that you posted from tells you what it is :
As with many other merchants, the iTunes Store and Mac App Store places an authorization hold on your payment card account for the approximate amount of any purchase you make. If you update your billing information, the iTunes Store or Mac App Store will place an authorization hold on your payment card account, usually in the amount of 1 USD or the local currency equivalent, to verify your account information.
Authorization holds are removed by your financial institution shortly after your purchase clears. The time it takes to remove authorization requests varies by financial institution.

Vendor consignment return and vailability check

Dear friends.
We created a vendor consignment PO(K in item category and tick return box) and realized PO was committed from unrestricted stock instead of consignment stock,which cause no availability check in sales order due to insufficient available stock. My question is how to configure to make this type of PO to be committed from only consignment stock.
Thanks in advance,
Linda

When creating a consignment return PO item I got error message ME640 (see note 334331 which implements this).
I followed the instruction described the error message. It (ME640) has been set to warning - there's no other setting is needed.
After that I was able to save the PO and post the goods issue in MIGO (A01-R01).
The GI consumed the stock:
- from consignment stock segment
- unrestricted stock type
Please note that within consignment stock segment the susual stock types (unrestricted, QI, blocked) exist.
It's strange that it didn't use special stock segment "K" in your case. Is this true? How did you do the process?
@Kailas Ugale
Your message will be deleted because you answered only by copying link. Please note that link farming is not welcomed on the forum.
Please use the forum properly.
@Venkat0009
Your messgae will be rejected too because you copy pasted the text as your own answer w/o referring to the source.
Please use the forum properly.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 18, 2011 9:31 PM

Mass Vendor Deletion and posting Block unblock.

Hi All,
I have done the mass deletion flag and posting block of vendors ate P.org and Co.code level through t.code-XK99.
I want to retrive my changes and vendor shuold active again instead of populating a warning message.I am aware of T.Code-XK05 but i tried it through T.Code-XK99 however i am not able to unblock those vendors.
could anyone let me know were i am ,missing.
Regards,
Gaurav Surana

Transaction MASS > LFA1 is same as in XK99
XK99 should work in your case. Please check that you are selecting the correct table and fields to be changed in this XK99 transaction.
Are you also getting any error message during the saving in XK99?
Regards,
SDNer

Vendor lost check. Want to void them and re-issue new check.

Here's ther problem:
I have 2 checks (#37931 and #38176) that were issued in fiscal year 2010 that have been lost by the recipient. As a result, I need to void these checks and reissue payment. The checks were issued out of company #####. At the end of October, Accounting Clerk did a posting to clear the intercompany account. This clearing document took her apparently over 4 hours to post, so it cannot be reversed.
However, this clearing document is preventing the checks from being able to be voided. If we try to void the checks, we get the following message.:
Document #### 2000004550 is not purely a clearing document.
Message no. FS 601
Diagnosis
Payment Document ##### 2000004550 is company code ##### also contains the clearing docuement number 100000777 in addition to its own clearing document number. As a result the documents cannot be reversed after resetting the cleared Items.
System response
The payment cannot be reset.
Procedure
Check the data entered and correct your entry, if necessary.
If the payment for document ##### 2000004550 is really to be reset, the cleared items 100000777 have to be reset prior to this
Can someone think of a better way to handle this correction as you can see the clearing step took 4 hours to complete..

hi,
as i understand it, you only want to void the checks and then reissue a new one without having to cancel the payment, right?
If yes, you can voice the checks via FCH9 and then reassign a new one via FCH5.
regards,
Chaikaru

List of PO's by vendor, with value, amount receipt, and amount invoiced

Hi is there a standard report which I could run for a vendor/range of vendors, which would list for each PO (and line) the amount of the PO, the amount receipts, and the amount invoiced as a minimum?
Points awarded for assistance

Hi,
List of POs by Vendor --ME2L
List of POs by GI/IR balances---MB5S
General Evalation of POs---- ME80FN
regards,
santosh

Security Segregating Park and Posting Vendor invoices

I'm working to create a role that allows a user to create & park but not post an invoice. The objects that I would think should be checked are not and if I give access to create for F_BKPF_BUK and F_FAGL_SEG it allows parking and posting.
I don't really understand why object F_BKPF_BLA isn't restricting it when it has values for create, change and post (post not being checked it appears).
Any suggestions? the role I've created for parking is using trxns: F-42 and F-63.

Obviously from a SOD standpoint you need to split the park and post functions. What I have done in the past is to use primarily F-47 and F-63 in the Park Role and have 77 (pre-enter) as the value for the F_BKPF* objects. Make good use of SU22 or SU24 (though these are not always 100% correct) to help you determine the correct values and sometimes you need to "right-click" on the activity box then select "more values"

Vendor 800040 and posting data have different withholding tax types

HI
need some help..
i ve created the lease in contract but unable to activate it... getting the following error
Vendor 800040 and posting data have different withholding tax types...
how to solve this issue,,

Hi,
could you please add the error message ID and error message number.
Thank you.
Regards, Franz

Pre and Post up gradation checks.

Hi Gurus,
Can someone please explain Pre and Post up gradation checks during converting 3.x queries to Net Weaver 2004 version.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Check these.
Upgradation from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0
Upgrading Bex Queries from BW3.5 to BI7
Regards.

Vendor Amount Checking and posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for