Vendor Evaluatation..

Hi all ,
We want to develop new Z report for Vendor evaluation .. the Evaluation criterias are Delivery & Quality
i.e Delivery carry the weight of 40% and Quality 60%
What all the table we need to consider for Z report & Logic for the same
Thanks in advance

Hi,
T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Similar Messages

Multiple row insert not working as before after applying hotfix apsb13-13

Coldfusion 9.01
Windows Server 2003
Microsoft Access database (yeah, we know)
Before the hotfix was applied, we could add multiple rows (anywhere from 1-100 or more) and now we're limited to 15 rows at a time after applying the hotfix. We've narrowed it down to the hotfix being the culprit as we had to rebuild the server not to long after this hotfix was applied (~ 1 month) and the multiple row inserts were once again working fine until we got to the point of applying this hot fix again.
Anyone heard of this happening? Any ideas how to correct?
Thanks in advance,
fmHelp
Below is code of how we're doing the multiple row insert (it's performed over 3 pages):
Page 1
<cfform name="form1" method="post" action="handler.cfm?page=update_2">
<input type="hidden" name="sProductID" value="<cfoutput>#qProducts.sProductID#</cfoutput>">
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3">
<tr>
    <th scope="row" colspan="2" align="center">Update an Inventory Product</th>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th width="42%" scope="row">Product ID</th>
    <td width="58%"><cfoutput>#qProducts.sProductID#</cfoutput></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th width="42%" scope="row">Friendly Name</th>
    <td width="58%"><cfoutput>#qProducts.sFriendly_Name#</cfoutput></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th width="42%" scope="row">Description</th>
    <td width="58%"><cfoutput>#qProducts.sDescription#</cfoutput></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th width="42%" scope="row">Vendor</th>
    <td><select name="sVendor">
      <cfoutput><option value="#qProducts.sVendor#">#qProducts.sVendor#</option></cfoutput>
      <option value=""></option>
      <cfoutput query="qVendor">
        <option value="#sVendor#">#sVendor#</option>
      </cfoutput>
    </select></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row">Order No.</th>
    <td><cfinput name="sOrder_No" type="text" value="" required="yes" message="Order number is a required field."></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row">Lot No.</th>
    <td><input name="sLot" type="text" value=""/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row">Date Expires</th>
    <td><input name="dtExpire" type="text" value=""/></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row">Boxes received</th>
    <td><input name="iBoxes" type="text" value="" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row">Doses/Units</th>
    <td><input name="pcount" type="text" value="" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row">Note</th>
    <td><cfoutput>#qProducts.sNote#</cfoutput></td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row"> </th>
    <td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
    <th scope="row" colspan="2" align="center"><input type="submit" value="Submit" /></th>
</tr>
</table>
</cfform>
</table>
Page 2
<form name="form1" method="post" action="handler.cfm?page=update_3">
<cfoutput><input type="hidden" name="pcount" value="#FORM.pcount#"></cfoutput>
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
    <tr>
          <td colspan="6" align="left">Record count (Doses/Units)= <cfoutput>#FORM.pcount#</cfoutput></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>Product ID</td>
        <td>Vendor</td>
        <td>Order No.</td>
        <td>Lot No.</td>
        <td>Expiration Date</td>
        <td>Num. of Boxes</td>
    </tr>
    <cfset Peoplecount = 0>
    <cfloop index="Add" from="1" to="#form.pcount#" step="1">
        <tr>
            <cfset Peoplecount = PeopleCount + 1>
            <td><input <cfoutput> value="#FORM.sProductID#" </cfoutput> name="sProductID_<cfoutput>#Peoplecount#</cfoutput>" type="text" id="sProductID_"></td>
            <td><input <cfoutput>value="#FORM.sVendor#"</cfoutput> name="sVendor_<cfoutput>#Peoplecount#</cfoutput>" type="text" id="sVendor_"></td>
            <td><input <cfoutput> value="#FORM.sOrder_No#" </cfoutput> name="sOrder_No_<cfoutput>#Peoplecount#</cfoutput>" type="text" id="sOrder_No_"></td>
            <td><input <cfoutput>value="#FORM.sLot#"</cfoutput> name="sLot_<cfoutput>#Peoplecount#</cfoutput>" type="text" id="sLot_"></td>
            <td><input <cfoutput> value="#DateFormat(FORM.dtExpire, 'MM/DD/YY')#" </cfoutput> name="dtExpire_<cfoutput>#Peoplecount#</cfoutput>" type="text" id="dtExpire_"></td>
            <td><input <cfoutput>value="#FORM.iBoxes#"</cfoutput> name="iBoxes_<cfoutput>#Peoplecount#</cfoutput>" type="text" id="iBoxes_"></td>
        </tr>
    </cfloop>
    <tr>
        <td> </td>
        <td>
            <input type="submit" name="Submit" value="Submit">
            <input name="HowMany" type="hidden" id="HowMany" value="<cfoutput>#Form.pcount#</cfoutput>">
        </td>
    </tr>
</table>
</form>
</table>
Page 3
<cfquery name="qGetOnHand" datasource="#variables.DSNCI#">
SELECT        *
FROM        Products
WHERE        sProductID = '#session.sProductID#'
</cfquery>
<cfquery datasource="#variables.DSNCI#">
UPDATE        Products
SET            iOnHandQty = (#FORM.pcount# + #qGetOnHand.iOnHandQty#)
WHERE        sProductID = '#session.sProductID#'
</cfquery>
<cfset quantity = #FORM.pcount#>
<cfset Pcount = 0>

<cfloop index="Add" from="1" to="#form.howmany#" step="1">
    <cfset Pcount = Pcount + 1>
    <cfset Product = "Form.sProductID_#Pcount#">
    <cfset Product = Evaluate(Product)>
    <cfset Vendor = "Form.sVendor_#Pcount#">
    <cfset Vendor = Evaluate(Vendor)>
    <cfset Order = "Form.sOrder_No_#Pcount#">
    <cfset Order = Evaluate(Order)>
    <cfset Lot = "Form.sLot_#Pcount#">
    <cfset Lot = Evaluate(Lot)>
    <cfset Expires = "Form.dtExpire_#Pcount#">
    <cfset Expires = Evaluate(Expires)>
    <cfset Boxes = "Form.iBoxes_#Pcount#">
    <cfset Boxes = Evaluate(Boxes)>
    <cfquery datasource="#variables.DSNCI#" name="InsertData">
        Insert into Received_History (sProductID, sVendor, sOrder_No, sLot, dtExpire, iBoxes, dtReceived)
        values ('#Product#', '#Vendor#', '#Order#', '#Lot#', <cfif Expires IS "">NULL<cfelse>#CreateOdbcDate(Expires)#</cfif>, #Boxes#, #CreateOdbcDate(Now())#)
    </cfquery>
</cfloop>

Rasi wrote:show your complete default.pa (also make sure that you dont override pulse settings in ~/.config/pulse) this setting should allow sound for ANY user - i just tried it and it works
also: of course you restarted pulseaudio?
I restarted pulseaudio and my computer.
My default.pa is displayed in the first post.
My files in /etc/pulse:
> ls -la /etc/pulse
total 28
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 116 May 16 10:22 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3740 May 16 10:47 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1269 Mar 3 21:31 client.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2348 Oct 8 2013 daemon.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5756 May 16 10:24 default.pa
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5718 Oct 8 2013 default.pa.pacnew
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2112 Oct 8 2013 system.pa
-la
My files in ~/.config/pulse:
> ls -la ~/.config/pulse
total 1048
drwx------ 1 homeuser homeuser 660 Sep 12 2013 .
drwx------ 1 homeuser homeuser 1054 Apr 24 14:06 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 40960 Oct 17 2013 1a8726d55f9140ae9d95dc512eacea67-card-database.tdb
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 43 May 16 10:37 1a8726d55f9140ae9d95dc512eacea67-default-sink
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 42 May 16 10:37 1a8726d55f9140ae9d95dc512eacea67-default-source
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 12288 May 16 10:49 1a8726d55f9140ae9d95dc512eacea67-device-volumes.tdb
lrwxrwxrwx 1 homeuser homeuser 23 Sep 12 2013 1a8726d55f9140ae9d95dc512eacea67-runtime -> /tmp/pulse-cDmMRoO9oFBz
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 12288 May 15 22:43 1a8726d55f9140ae9d95dc512eacea67-stream-volumes.tdb
-rw------- 1 homeuser homeuser 256 Jun 15 2013 cookie
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 331776 Jun 21 2013 equalizer-presets.tdb
-rw-r--r-- 1 homeuser homeuser 659456 Sep 20 2013 equalizer-state.tdb
Thanks for your efforts.

"Evaluate vendor" button inactive in vendor list

Hi friends,
While trying to call questionnaire in vendor list, I find "evaluate vendor" icon inactive. Following two settings are done:
1. Created questionnaire and assignmed to survey. Assigned an agent to the survey with valid email address
2. Maintained all details in "Define events for vendor evaluation in SRM"
Pls suggest if I am missing anything to activate this button.
Regards,
Prashant

Dear Prashant,
Wanted to know how you solved that inactive button.
Same issue with me. I am not able to activate a change button in Vendor aplication view while trying to change data for a vendor.
could you reply pls,.

Vendor Evaluation: How to evaluate number of vendors in one go

All SAP Gurus,
How we can evaluate number of vendors in one go?
Regards,

Hi,
Go to transaction ME6G & schedule the program RM06LBAT to run vendor evaluation for multiple vendors at one time.
Else you can use SE38 transaction with program RM06LBAT

Is it possible to evaluate vendor on criteria timely delivery in # of days

Hi,
has anyone been succesful in evaluating vendor's timely delivery in terms of days.
I have gone through the help documentation and other insights from various members but do not quiet understand if I can evaluate vendor's delivery perfomance in terms of days.
The agreement with the vendor is that - a shipment is on time as long as it recieved 2 days early or 1 day late based on the stastical delivery date. Is there a standard cunctionality that I could configure for on-time delivery criteria to make the system consider 2 days early and 1 day late as "on-time" ?
regards,
Sanjay

yes you can do that
go to the vendor evualtion in SPRO-MM-Purchasing
and go for your Pur org
here select the Ponint score and locate the on time delivery criteria
and enter the score based on the percentage you want
you can enter like 2 days early 100 score adn
-1 day also 100 score
it is totaly how you defined here.

Receiving mail with questionnaire and upload to evaluate vendor

Hello,
I have a little problem using ROS. The auto-register is ok, the questionnaire is sent to vendor but we dont know exactly how to link the sending of the questionnaire by vendor with the upload to ROS system.
I mean, can someone send me a screen-capture of the SO50 transaction? Or tell me how you configure sapconnect or if you implement the exit CL_UWS_FORM_RUNTIME_MAIL to upload the questionnaire to ROS?
Regards,

Hi,
Questionnaire is sent to SRM by email attachment. Inbound Processing program in SRM side gets the attachment and store information to SRM. You should configure incoming email setup and inbound processing configuration in SO50 transaction. SO50 entry is like this.
Internetmail [email protected] * CL_UWS_FORM_RUNTIME_MAIL 1
Create a user MAILADM in SU01 and assign email address.
Regards,
Masa

Vendor Evaluation Report

Hi All,
We have a problem. The vendor evaluation report is not considering the rejections of goods and shows the quality as 100.
The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
VT

hi
for vendor evalution you have to do the necessary settings in MM and QM. then you have to carry out the transactions in MM and QM

Quaterly report on vendor spending

Hi Gurus,
I am working on developing a quaterly vendor spend report with some additional custom fields to narrow down the custom report. I am looking at table LFC1. I want to know if that is the right table for payment information for quaterly purpose. Also, please throw in your logic to calculate the quaterly amount .
Also, suggest me if there are any other tables i should be taking into picture for vendor quarterly spend report .
Thank you for reading this message and will really appreciate if you can send your views.
Sri
Moderator message - Cross post locked
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Sep 23, 2009 2:15 PM

there is no such report on PO level. you have to develope it yourself.
SAP only captures and evaluates this only on aggrgated levels per month.

In the case of Bidding, Vendor will submit 1pack bid and 2pack bid.

Hi SRM GURUu2019S,
We are implementing SRM 5.5, SUS, cFolder, and LAC.
Scenario : In the case of Bidding, Vendor will submit 1pack bid and 2pack bid. If vendor submitted 2pack bid, We want evaluate Techno-commercial bid, If he qualifies then we will accept him to Price bid, In Live Auction or In the Bidding Engine. If the vendor not qualified we have to send me a letter.
Question : 1. How to evaluate weather is it 1Pack bid and 2 Pack bid?.
                   2. How to evaluate 2 pack bid Techno-commercial?.
                   3. How to send a letter to rejected vendors?.
Greatly appreciate, If any help me to find solution.
Thanks & Regards,
John.

Hi,
I appreciate that you are implementing SRM 5.5, SUS, cFolder, and LAC.
You are implementing the Sourcing scenario.
Instead of implementing in SRM 5.5 better go for SRM 7.0 with Procurement for public sector (PPS) fucntionality
The following advantages are the.
1. 1 pack bid (single Cover system)
2. 2 pack bid (Double cover system)
is a standard functionality in SRM 7.0 /pps in addition you can enter the Tender Fees,EMD Fees ,
also. While creating the bid itself you can select 1 pack bid (or) two pack bid
Question : 1. How to evaluate weather is it 1Pack bid and 2 Pack bid?.
if it is 1 pack bid you have to enter the opening date and time only once where the technical bid and price bid will be there.
if it is 2 pack bid the technical bid opening date and time is say 11.08.2009 the price bid opening date 25.08.2009 can be set and the bids are published
2. How to evaluate 2 pack bid Techno-commercial?.
There is a comparison button in SRM 5.5 and in SRM 7.0 also the same functionality.Out of the bids that wer submitted it will choose the least.. but for practical purpose each client has to decide on other factors .so better price comparison should be done manually even though system propose the least price
3. How to send a letter to rejected vendors?.
you have sent a mail or letter out of SAP .(or) most probably during the bid itself all the bidders will be participating there you can announce and sent the mail perosonally (or) Z program can be written
In SRM 5.5 you have to do some developments for the 2 pack system
IT IS STANDARD IN SRM 7.0 WITH PPS AND IT IS AVAILABLE IN THE MARKET..
Better convince the client to go for SRM 7.0 which is released in APRIL 2009 ..
SRM 7.0 is supported by WEBDYNPRO BASED and WORKFLOW for approval is new called
BUSINESS RULE FRAMEWORK (BRF)
Hope you are clear
Regards
Ganesh

Report on Vendor Ontime Delivery

Hi
Is there any Standard SAP report available on Vendor Ontime delivery, which is report showing deviation of PO delivery Date and GR date
we need this report to monitor vendors
Thanks

there is no such report on PO level. you have to develope it yourself.
SAP only captures and evaluates this only on aggrgated levels per month.

Tables for vendor evaluation data

Hai,
    I want to know the tables in which vendor evaluation data is being stored, and I need to get vendor evaluation data through my RFC, can u suggest me the procedure how I need to do it.
                             Thank you
                              Regards
                                Srinivas

Dear,
You ask a whole Vendor evaluation concept you need to read the help and do customizing depend on the requirement, then you evaluate the vendor using ME61 or ME6G.Almost all of your question need customizing setup first
below is the guide book :
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

Vendor Evaluation in SAP

Hi SAP Experts,
We want to implement the vendor evaluation system for all material and service vendors in SAP. We have evaluated the standard functionality in SAP and most of the requirements are met if we use the standard system. But we are facing few major problems.
Firstly it is regarding the evaluation level. The purchasing team wants to do the evaluation for each purchase order raised for the vendor. As per my understanding, we can do the vendor evaluation at the most at the purchasing info record level. This might not be sufficient for us.
Secondly, we have a lot of cases of Service POs where we dont have info records since materials are not involved. I am not sure if the standard system would work in evaluating such cases at each PO level.
Appreciate your comments and suggestions.
Thanx & Regards,
Sateesh

Hi,
Evaluating the vendor at PO level meaning we want to evaluate the performance of the vendor for each PO / Service PO. We want a provision to enter the ratings for each criterion for each PO. e.g. Quality of material for PO 45_01 and PO 45_02 would be evaluated seperately. Then we would like to consolidate the data at the vendor level.
Hope this clarifies the doubt.
Regards,
Sateesh

WCS 7.0.164.0 Report by vendor (device type)

WCS 7.0.164.0
I have been asked to produce a client’s report that shows all different vendors (devices type). We have about 10000 users in our system on about 3000 APs (light version) I created a client summary report but encountered some limitations:
If I select any time period over 6 hours, I get the message “The report you are trying to generate contains more than the supported number of records (10000). Change the report criteria to generate a report with fewer records”
If I select a time period of 6 hours or less, I get the report including vendor statistics. Is there any way to differentiate within the vendors by device type? For example instead of the vendor apple, get apple-iPhone, apple-iTouch, apple-laptop, etc.
I would like the ability to create my own reports, by I don’t think it is possible on the Version I’m running. All reports can be customized up to a point, but you still get information you might not care for.
Thanks for any information to overcome these issues.
Jorge Jiles.

Hi Jorge,
It looks like such a level of granularity may not be achievable yet.
Should you need such a feature to be evaluated for potentially being included in future software releases, I would recommend to contact your local Cisco account team.
They should be able to follow up and submit a product enhancement request (PER).
Business units will evaluate PERs and, if feasible for the market, they may consider implementing such an enhancement in future versions of the SW/HW.
Regards,
Fede

Standard vendor evaluation t.code S_ALR_87012077

Hi,
In our system standard evaluation is all ready configured. When i am running program RFKKGRN it also updateing. But when i capmpared report from program S_ALR_87012078 with report S_ALR_87012077 i found that some vendors are not at all appearing in S_ALR_8012077. Also at gross level there is difference in amount.
What can be done so that those vendors to copied to vendor evaluaton sets?
Thanks

Hi,
in trcode OBAO we have as Program for data retrieve following program:
RFKRRSEL Create Evaluations for Vendor Information System
Program which supplies the data for the evaluation
Program for data retrieval. Data are transferred to all evaluations of this evaluation view which are selected to be recreated in the next generation run.
Procedure
If you define an evaluation view, enter a program for data retrieval.
Dependencies
How much data the program retrieves is determined by the selection variant in the Data retrieval variant field.
check also the details below:
No evaluations exist. See long text.
Message no. FE529
Diagnosis
You want to display evaluations from the accounts payable information system. You can only do this if the evaluations were generated as a background job.
Procedure
To activate the standard configuration (in order to gain an instant overview of the functions available in the accounts receivable information system) you must carry out the following steps:
1. Copy standard settings
This function copies the standard configuration. If the log thus generated tells you that none of the configuration (or only a part of it) was copied, this merely means that this function has already been called up, for example from the Implementation Guide. This has no effect on the following steps.
Proceed
2. Define data volume
In this step you define the volume of data you want to evaluate. You branch to the configuration menu and maintain the report variant that has been defined for the evaluation view you selected.
Proceed
3. Select evaluation
You must now define which of the pre-configured evaluations you want to generate. This function takes you to the configuration menu, where you select the evaluation to be generated. The selection field for this is roughly in the middle of the line.
Proceed
4. Generate evaluation
This function generates a background job. The ABAP program you need to run is defaulted in the job definition screen and cannot be changed. The only entry you need to make is the standard variant 'SAP_VARI' in the 'Variant' field.
After the background job has run, you can display the evaluation.
Proceed
For more information, refer to the Implementation Guide and the online help on the 'Financial Information System'.

Vendor Evaluation in Background

Dear Gurus,
For vendor evaluation in Back ground, Do i need to maintain weight keys? then where can i see the output report once after running vendor evaluation in background.
Please advice
Thanks
RS

Dear,
Weighting Key is an identifier under which weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved. If you know that you want to carry out an evaluation with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The stardard two keys available are 01, 02.
If you do not have the weighting key, use the possible entries facility.
Next, in the background processing, usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you may not enter a Weighting Key.
However the evaluation with weighting keys are preferred (basing on your organizations requirements and client performance, these may not be required). If you have enough time and interested to review the subject please have a look at: http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf?bcsi_scan_DAD819A53026B58E=0&bcsi_scan_filename=MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Vendor Evaluatation..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for