Is it possible to evaluate vendor on criteria timely delivery in # of days

Hi,
has anyone been succesful in evaluating vendor's timely delivery in terms of days.
I have gone through the help documentation and other insights from various members but do not quiet understand if I can evaluate vendor's delivery perfomance in terms of days.
The agreement with the vendor is that - a shipment is on time as long as it recieved 2 days early or 1 day late based on the stastical delivery date. Is there a standard cunctionality that I could configure for on-time delivery criteria to make the system consider 2 days early and 1 day late as "on-time" ?
regards,
Sanjay

yes you can do that
go to the vendor evualtion in SPRO-MM-Purchasing
and go for your Pur org
here select the Ponint score and locate the on time delivery criteria
and enter the score based on the percentage you want
you can enter like 2 days early 100 score adn
-1 day also 100 score
it is totaly how you defined here.

Similar Messages

"Evaluate vendor" button inactive in vendor list

Hi friends,
While trying to call questionnaire in vendor list, I find "evaluate vendor" icon inactive. Following two settings are done:
1. Created questionnaire and assignmed to survey. Assigned an agent to the survey with valid email address
2. Maintained all details in "Define events for vendor evaluation in SRM"
Pls suggest if I am missing anything to activate this button.
Regards,
Prashant

Dear Prashant,
Wanted to know how you solved that inactive button.
Same issue with me. I am not able to activate a change button in Vendor aplication view while trying to change data for a vendor.
could you reply pls,.

Possible to change vendor in invoice level

Is it possible to change vendor in invoice level if yes how

Hi,
Go to MIRO, in Details Tab change the Invoicing Party.
Or use partner function for that Vender and Document Type. It will direct flow from PO.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Is it possible change the vendor old addres while reprinting check in F110

Hi Friends
Is it possible change the vendor old address while reprinting check in F110?
My user first he run the APP and he print the check with wrong address, after that he realized, he had taken print with old address.
Now he want reprint the check after changing the new address in vendor master.
As per my knowledge, once print the check it will store in REGUH table. if we change address at vendor level it will store at LFA1 Table.
So Is it possible change the vendor old address while reprinting check in F110.
Can any body please give me suggestion regarding on the same
Thank You
Regards
vamsi

Hi Vamsi,
you are right, it is not possinble to get new address with reprint check.
Along with clearing document system updates vendor details and line item detais in REGUH / REGUP tables. when user get print, system takes data from REGUH and print details.
In your situation cancel check and reset clear documetn and again execute payment, then system fetch new address.
Regards,
Viswa

Payment to vendor above Rs.20,000 (in a day) - Except for One-Time Vendors

hi guys,
this is pertaining to FBCJ.
i need to ensure that any posting to Cash Journal per Vendor should not exceed Rs.20,000 for that day for that Cash Journal. An exception to this rule would be payment made to ONE TIME VENDORS for which cumulative amount for that day can exceed Rs,20,000.
Can this be done through GGB0 ??
Pls help.

Hi
Sorry, but the other possibility that I know is to enhance the BAPI that do the same that FBCJ, that it isn't your requirement. See Note 616804 - FBCJ: BAPI for saving cash journal documents by curiosity.
Regards
Eduardo
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Dec 15, 2011 3:34 PM

Any possibility to generate the bill first than Delivery & Picking?

Hi SD GURUS & EXPERTS,
We know that standard procedure of SAP SD is Sales Order --> Outbound Delivery -> Picking --> Billing. It means delivery & Picking is carried out before billing, and as we pick the material stock deducted from the inventory.
But in my scenario, Customer has a grace period of 7-15 days to get the delivery. It means Customer deposit the money at office than Billing should be generate (from Office). This bill sent to the ware house and ware house deliver the material against this Bill.
If we carried out standard procedure than there will be difference in Physical as well as System stock.
So, is there any possibility to generate the bill first than Delivery & Picking.
Thanks in advance.
Devendra Singh Chauhan

we do not maintain the Customer Master
Not necessary. For this purpose only, SAP has given an Account Group "One Time Customer" which you can make use of this.
With the same customer code, you can change the address as and when your client got a sale order from such customers.
With this customer code, you can create sale order, delivery, billing. In fact, you should be aware, SAP will allow you to generate proforma against a delivery that is not PGId. If at all you dont want to do PGI, you can make use of this option.
Needless to say, the system (billing and then delivery) what you had indicated is definitely not recommended.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time del

hi
We have following requirement related to Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time delivery
The requirement is:
Deliveries late by 7 days should be considered as on time.
pl suggest

Hi Chintu,
Thanks for ur reply.
scores i have configured for qty.variance as,
2     Qty. reliability                      100
2     Qty. reliability     5.0-              90
2     Qty. reliability     10.0-      80
2     Qty. reliability     20.0-      75
2     Qty. reliability     40.0-      50
2     Qty. reliability     50.0-      40
2     Qty. reliability     75.0-      20
2     Qty. reliability     80.0-        1
My dought is, For on on-time delivery we are not maintaining any smoothing factor right?
So, Which smoothing factor we should consider for on-time delivery?
I have maintained smoothing factor for
Timeliness service - .20
Quantity Reliability - .30
Shipping Instructions - .25.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 4:43 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM

Vendor partners in Outbound delivery

Hi Gurus,
Where can i check the vendor partners in outbound delivery which was created with reference to inter STO PO.
I hope my question is clear.
Kindly give reply
Regards,
prasad

Thanks Rajesh for quick reply.
I did the same earlier but if delivery block is available in ECC and material is stage on hold area. and now after some time i need to dispatch same delivery, but now i am not able to remove delivery block from ECC, Beacouse Vl02N does not work after delivery distributed in EWM so how can i do PGI for the same .

Is it possible to compare vendor quotations with leadtime & payment terms?

Good day,
I am wondering if the system can be configured to compare vendor quotations on by criteria other than pricing? My client would want to compare vendor quotations received using lead time, terms of payment as well as pricing. Any ideas? If possible, how can this be achieved?

hi
Your requirement is fulfill with only scenario of vendor evaluation, but you can crate quotation ME41 maintain quotation & price comparison with ME49
To determine a vendor's price level, the system compares the vendor's effective price with the market price for the material.
The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained a market price for the material or the material group.
If not, the system calculates the market price which is equal to the average of the effective prices for all vendors supplying this material. Prices from purchase orders and prices for subcontracting are dealt with separately.
The system then applies the effective price for the vendor from the conditions.
The vendor's effective price is then compared with the market price and the percentage variance determined.
The system then assigns a score to the variance in accordance with the settings made in Customizing.
This score is valid for the material, that is, at info record level. Since the score the vendor receives for a subcriterion is based not on an individual material, but on the total of all the materials he supplies, the following steps are necessary:
The system repeats the comparison between effective price and market price for each of the vendor's materials.
The system calculates an average from the sum of the scores determined. This average represents the vendor's score for the subcriterion Price Level.
regards
ronny

Possible to clear vendor open item against already posted payment document?

Hi
Can you advise if it is possible to clear an open item against already posted payment/clearing doc? Here is the background to the scenario:
An invoice was posted with transaction FB60. This was subsequently picked up in the payment run F110 and cleared by payment document number 200005678. The item went to the bank on the paymnet file and was paid out to the vendor. The transaction reference, which appeared on the incoming bank statemnet was the payment document number 200005678.
Subsequently it was discovered that the original invoice should have been posted with reference to a PO using MIRO. The requirement now is to reverse the paymnet documnet 200005678 in SAP, then reverse the document that was posted using FB60. After this the invoice will be posted using MIRO. This will create an open item on the vendor account.
This item will not be piad out again. Therefore the requirement is to try clear that open item against the previously posted payment document 200005678.
Is there any way to clear this vendor open item against the originally posted payment document 200005678?? Or any other advice on how this scenario can be handled in SAP?
Thank for your help.
Mike

Hi,
I tried that option in our test system. I ran FBRA and entered Paymnet Documnet Number (+Clearing Doc Number), Company Code, Fiscal Year.
Then chose menu option Clearing -> Reset Cleared Items.
The system pops up a window asking for a reversal reason and reversal date. I use 01 and posting date of today.
The system now posts another cleared document. That document places the invoice as an open item on the vendor account. It does not place the Payment Document as an open item on the account.
When I go to F-44 only the open vendor invoice is showing there. There is no open paymnet document.
Is there perhaps some configuration setting that stops the placement of the paymnet document as an open item when reset?
Thanks for your help again.

Is it even possible to dynamically apply view criteria in an ADF Web App?

This is one of those situations where something that should take an hour ends up taking days.
* I have a view.
* The view has Bind Variables associated with it.
* The view has View Criteria associated with it.
* Each of the View Criteria use different Bind Variables.
* I have a search criteria input page that receives from the user what will ultimately be used to set the bind variables.
* I have a search results page that uses the view to display a table.
* I have the code that dynamically sets view criteria and parameters. It is based on the following:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31974/bcadvvo.htm#BCGFHAGA
* This code works great, until the iterator associated with the table binding to the view is initialized. At that time, the view is reset to its defaults, and all of my code's doings are discarded. How do I know this? Because I have gone so far as to run my code that sets view criteria and binding variables dynamically in a phase event handler for the search results page in the render response phase. There is no other point at which to dynamically modify the view.
This is turning into a situation where it seems I will need 5 different views and 5 different pages in order to show a single set of query results. I cannot get dynamically applied view criteria to work in an ADF web app. Has anyone else done it? Can anyone relate to this? Are there any other suggestions before I conclude that it's not possible for this framework to handle this simple scenario?
Thanks

There must be a setting or something that I am still missing here. If I write code just like this and make sure it is executed, I still only see the results of my view executed without the view criteria applied using the default bind variable values that I supplied in the view object.
It's like the fact that I set the bind variables, the view criteria, and executed the view query programmatically is lost on the iterator -- it's like it never happened. What setting is used to ensure that the iterator uses the outcome of what I executed programmatically? There has to be a critical set or setting that I am missing.
Here is the iterator and search region definitions defined in the page def "executables" section:
<executables>
     <iterator Binds="CustomSearchView1" RangeSize="25"
              DataControl="AppModuleDataControl"
              id="CustomSearchView1Iterator"/>
    <searchRegion Binds="CustomSearchView1Iterator"
                  Customizer="oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUSearchBindingCustomizer"
                  id="CustomSearchView1Query"/>
    </executables>Here's the "tree" binding in the page def file:
<bindings>
   <tree IterBinding="CustomSearchView1Iterator" id="CustomSearchView1">
      <nodeDefinition DefName="Model.CustomSearchView" Name="CustomSearchView10">
        <AttrNames>
          <Item Value="CustomId"/>
          <Item Value="CustomProjectNumber"/>
          <Item Value="CustomName"/>
          <Item Value="CustomStatus"/>
          <Item Value="CustomStatusDate"/>
        </AttrNames>
      </nodeDefinition>
    </tree>
</bindings>In an effort to take page flow out of this mess, I had modified this to include the search criteria and search results on a single page. So, I now have a "Search" button. When the "Search" button is clicked, the action method does the following:
    public String searchActionListener ()
          // Get search criteria from select one choice and text input controls.
          AppModule appModule =
                ( AppModule ) Configuration.createRootApplicationModule (
                    "Model.AppModule",
                    "AppModuleLocal");
          appModule.customSearch( searchCriteria1,
                                               searchCriteria2,
                                               searchCriteria3 );
    }In my application module this translates to:
    public void customNoticeSearch ( String searchCriteria1, String searchCriteria2, String searchCriteria3)
       CustomSearchViewImpl searchViewImp =
           ( CustomSearchViewImpl ) this.getCustomSearchView1 ();
       searchViewImp.customExecuteQuery ( searchCriteria1, searchCriteria2, searchCriteria3);
    }Finally, in my custom view object implementation code:
    public void customExecuteQuery ( String searchCriteria1, String searchCriteria2, String searchCriteria3 )
        // Set-up the parameters that are part of the core query.
        this.setp_searchCriteria1( searchCriteria1);
        this.setp_searchCriteria2( searchCriteria2);
        if ( searchCriteria3 != null )
            ViewCriteriaManager vcm = this.getViewCriteriaManager();
            ViewCriteria vc = vcm.getViewCriteria ( "WithLastCriteria" );
            this.setp_searchCriteria3( new Number ( searchCriteria3 ) );
            this.applyViewCriteria( vc );
        System.out.println ("This is fun.");
        this.executeQuery();
    }This code executes, but the results table is empty, and I know that there are results, because I can execute use execute with params to execute the base query and get the correct results back.
Thanks for taking a look at this.

Is it possible to create vendors with same name and city in FK01?

Hi All,
I need to create vendor through transaction FK01.
I need to create two vendors:
1. Name-Abdul, City-Hyderabad, Country-India.
2. Name-Abdul, City-Hyderabad, Country-Pakistan.
Is it possible to create in such a way.
Please help.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Gautam,
yes it's possible, because the key is only LIFNR.
The address can be as you want.
regards, Dieter

Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

Hi Gurus,
I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
Pls advice on this.
Regards,
Venu

Hi
There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards
Raja

Vendor evaluation criteria rejects/complaints

Hi,
I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ?
Also is it mandatory to use the Q2/F2 notifications types for vendor evaluation.? What if I create my own Z notification type with origin Q2 ? Will vendor eval still work ?
Thanks

Hi Shailendra,
I am aware of all these settings and have gone thru your document as well. However if you read my post carefully you will see what I am actually asking.
"I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ? "
My question is...how do I show all the notificaitons of type external origin when I run my ME63 report ? Right now no matter how many notifications I create and assign the the external origin, they dont show up in ME63.
Thanks

Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month

Dear Gurus,
I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
Thanks & Regards
Akshay

I don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get a 100 %

Is it possible to evaluate vendor on criteria timely delivery in # of days

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for